Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link
Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/9/2010 10:04 AM, jim wrote: If I read you right, sure you can. But beware, it takes two mouseclicks! Click on the link and the whole link is selected. Click again and the entire link is unselected, but any portion can now be swiped with the mouse and selected for copy. jim Huh? When I click on a link, it opens a new browser window. Same with me, Mark, and by the time I've switched back to the main/newsgroup screen to give a second click, it's as though I've just given a second single click. Now, if the browser page could be opening in the back ground..! -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link
Philip Chee: [http://i.am.a.link] Press F7 to go into caret browsing mode. Use the keyboard cursor keys to move it to where you want to start, OK until here, but then ... highlight the text you want to copy, ... how? No luck with my SM 2.1 to highlight only the 'am'. With the mouse. Another way to select i don't know of? Hm. Ah. Shift + Cursor-right. :) CTRL-C, Not necessary. It's already done with highlighting. Now a middle-mouse click to insert. I'm on Linux. and Bob's your Uncle. Understandable from the context. At least i hope so. *g* Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffMjef...@email.com wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages but who have NO IDEA what they are doing. The next time you encounter this situation, go to this page: http://validator.w3.org/ Feed in the URL of the page with problems. You should see something like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ **Passed** and not like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/oper ating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 3134 Errors At that point, you will know where to place the blame. 26 XHTML errors, 6 CSS errors I get a mostly blank page. There is a logo in the top-left corner, the text English | United States[ Change ] in the top-right corner, and three lines of pale grey text at the bottom. If I accept images from all servers, I also get a navigation bar running across the page near the top; but I normally browse with my preference set to allow only images from the current page's server. By the way, I don't think this is a sniffing problem because I got the same result while spoofing Firefox 3.5.6. Oops! It is a sniffing problem. I get a To enter portal, click here line (with a link) when I spoof IE 7. Selecting that link gives me the FAQ. David, NoOp has suggested this site needs cookies turned on. I have my cookies set for sessional cookies and this site WFM! -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 18:57, OldTimer told the world: The install instruction at the download site (www.chuonthis.com)stated to save the file to [SeaMonkey] but I don't know which file to use. 1) c:\Documents Settings\sony\Application Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey ? (There's also an extension subfolder in Mozilla). 2) c:\program Files\Mozilla.org\SeaMonkey ? For the time being I've placed the download file (folderpane.xpi) on my desktop. The install instructions are to open Tools and select Extensions and click Install button. The Tools menu in either SM folder (above) doesn't have Extensions, but does have Add-on Manager. However when I click on Add-on Manager there's no folderpane extension listed. And I thought I was doing so well getting it downloaded to my PC. Can you take me through the next steps? Oh, you are almost there. You already have the folderpane.xpi file, and you already know where the Add-On Manager is. Now: - Open the Add-On Manager. - Click on the second icon (Extensions) -- the one that looks like a green jigsaw puzzle piece. - Click on the Install button on the lower left. - Select the folderpane.xpi file from where you saved it (apparently your desktop) and open it. There you go! Is it still possible using SM2 WebBrowser part to open the folderpane.xpi file ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:44:31 -0200, MCBastos wrote: Oh crap, turns out that there IS an even easier way... Chortle! Philip Chee has made available a version of Folderpane Tools that will install directly on Seamonkey with no need of disabling compatibility check or anything. It's here: http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#folderpanetools 1. http://www.google.com 2. Search for: seamonkey folder pane tools 3. Pick the third link. The first link will also eventually lead you to my webpage but you'd have to scroll down through all the messages in that thread. Phil Phil, it's better to give the url instead of speaking about Google My test using google http://www.google.com/search?hl=ensource=hpq=seamonkey+folder+pane+tools give me as the first link this page http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29t=1519805 Which, i think, is not your webpage :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: YMMV, but in any case, if we would not have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now. Why ? The Gecko 1.8 branch was abandoned by the Mozilla Core devs a long, long time ago. Only security and stability patches were then backported to that branch, not by Mozilla but by Linux distributors with long lived branches, but even that source of bug fixes seem to have dried up in the middle of 2009. Without a SeaMonkey 2.0 to migrate our users to. SeaMonkey would have died on the wine before the end of 2009. That's why the original plan to release SeaMonkey 2.0 in sync with Thunderbird 3.0 became fatal when Mozilla Messaging kept pushing back their release schedules, and pushing and pushing, until January 2010. So we took the decision to release SeaMonkey 2.0 at around Thunderbird 3.0b4 with the risk of a slightly unstable mailnews backend. But as the alternative was to let SeaMonkey die it wasn't really a choice. You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9.1) branch once Firefox 3.6 is out in early 2010 and Firefox 3.7 in late 2010. We had originally planned to keep 2.0 as our current branch for most of 2010. However it looks like we will need to release a 2.1 based on 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) somewhere in summer this year whether we like it or not. Phil Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects
JAS wrote: Jesse Molina wrote: Hi! I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care about Seamonkey at all. What is the status on this situation? Can anyone point to conversations, bugs, and other topics on the issue of Add-on incompatibility that I might be able to read into? http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=19t=500361start=1335 Don't know what specific addons are wanted by the OP, but https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/ should cover most (if not all) addons you can use on SeaMonkey, and they are many. -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Don't you thinkg updating SeaMonkey, Firefox or Thunderbird through the automated updates mechanism is a piece of cake? I hate automatic updates. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
2 Noticed features in SM -- possibly documented (somewhere)
In the email client -- If you wish to reply to only part of an email, swipe it with the mouse (select it) and hit reply. Only the selected portion is transferred (quoted) to the composition window. In the email client -- Images on the clipboard can be inserted into email composition. (I use ctrl-v) very useful for screen shots made with printscreen and window shots made with alt-printscreen YMMVDOYC FACE ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
History search function
Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its history search function. I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found it would bring up the original url that contained that text fragment -- though the text fragment was not in the URL. It apparently searched its cache files. That type of history search would be a nice-to-have for Seamonkey. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link
On 1/9/2010 8:13 PM, Philip Chee wrote: Press F7 to go into caret browsing mode. Use the keyboard cursor keys to move it to where you want to start, highlight the text you want to copy, CTRL-C, and Bob's your Uncle. Phil Thanks, Phil. That's a new one on me! Works like a charm :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: History search function
jim schrieb: Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its history search function. I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found it would bring up the original url that contained that text fragment -- though the text fragment was not in the URL. It apparently searched its cache files. That type of history search would be a nice-to-have for Seamonkey. I don't think that this is a feature of IE itself, I guess it's in addition when having installed windows search as computers which don't have that installed suggest to install it below the url-bar when typing to improve the results. The browser doesn't index the files. regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email Address Autocompletion
nr wrote: Using 2.0.1. When entering an email address in the To: box, after entering a few characters, prior versions of SeaMonkey would have the most recently used address at the top of the list (IIRC), but 2.0.1 brings up the list in alphabetical order. Is there any way to get the most recently used addresses at the top of the lists? Agreed!!! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Ray_Net wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Don't you thinkg updating SeaMonkey, Firefox or Thunderbird through the automated updates mechanism is a piece of cake? I hate automatic updates. If they work properly I love auto updates. In the past I've seen where an auto update was Bad and I ended having to go to site and download the application. On Mac its a piece of cake to replace the application with another version Drag the old application Icon (which is actually the entire application to trash open the .DMG file (Disk Image) drag the new version to application folder , double click to open and your set. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects
Robert Kaiser wrote: Jesse Molina schrieb: I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care about Seamonkey at all. Some do, some do not, unfortunately. We'll be trying to get in contact with the add-ons community even more to encourage them to make their work available for SeaMonkey as well, but even though we have probably about a million users, we naturally are standing in the shadow of the mass-market Firefox with its 200-300 million users. Still, with SeaMonkey 2, it's much easier to get Firefox add-ons to work with SeaMonkey, and we hope more and more add-ons will do that. Robert Kaiser One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated the site has abandoned the site. Until I started using QuoteColors It was my default Theme. Now I've had to use something else because of the incompatibility. The quotecolors vendor even tested and found it was a defect in SKyPilot. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Martin Freitag wrote: Philip Chee schrieb: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9.1) branch once Firefox 3.6 is out in early 2010 and Firefox 3.7 in late 2010. We had originally planned to keep 2.0 as our current branch for most of 2010. However it looks like we will need to release a 2.1 based on 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) somewhere in summer this year whether we like it or not. Is that bad? (e.g. that SM2.1 will be based on gecko 1.9.2) I guess (as a non-developer), the biggest change was the one from the old SM to the new toolkit stuff and won't cause severe changes while living in Gecko 1.9.x, especially not for the users. (like: oh, we have to abandon form-manager and half of the SM users crying, etc.) regards Martin Not Crying Pissed off (pardon my French). -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
John Doue wrote: On 1/10/2010 12:13 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Don't you thinkg updating SeaMonkey, Firefox or Thunderbird through the automated updates mechanism is a piece of cake? Yes, provided the update does not make incompatible extensions you are not prepared to do without ... Some extensions' author may have trouble updating as fast as the main product does. A point to consider and an important one, given the pivotal role customizing plays in the popularity of those products. Install MrTech extension that way you can block the compatibility check. Most that have been altered to work on SM 2 simply need the version check updated. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
Daniel wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffMjef...@email.comwrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. I note that you didn't give an example URL. http://www.efax.com/help/faq There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages but who have NO IDEA what they are doing. The next time you encounter this situation, go to this page: http://validator.w3.org/ Feed in the URL of the page with problems. You should see something like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.debian.org/ **Passed** and not like this http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://marketshare.hitslink.com/oper ating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 3134 Errors At that point, you will know where to place the blame. 26 XHTML errors, 6 CSS errors I get a mostly blank page. There is a logo in the top-left corner, the text English | United States[ Change ] in the top-right corner, and three lines of pale grey text at the bottom. If I accept images from all servers, I also get a navigation bar running across the page near the top; but I normally browse with my preference set to allow only images from the current page's server. By the way, I don't think this is a sniffing problem because I got the same result while spoofing Firefox 3.5.6. Oops! It is a sniffing problem. I get a To enter portal, click here line (with a link) when I spoof IE 7. Selecting that link gives me the FAQ. David, NoOp has suggested this site needs cookies turned on. I have my cookies set for sessional cookies and this site WFM! Have set use default cookie permissions seems to work for me. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: History search function
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:58:26 +0100, Martin Freitag prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: jim schrieb: Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its history search function. I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found it would bring up the original url that contained that text fragment -- though the text fragment was not in the URL. It apparently searched its cache files. That type of history search would be a nice-to-have for Seamonkey. I don't think that this is a feature of IE itself, I guess it's in addition when having installed windows search as computers which don't have that installed suggest to install it below the url-bar when typing to improve the results. The browser doesn't index the files. regards Martin Very interesting. I have never overtly installed any add-on to IE -- such as Windows Search. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.
Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server home page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the window is remembered and opened correctly in the new Tab. Shouldn't SM remember where you set the Preview pane in both cases? I can't see any difference. Maybe you can show that with a screenshot or two? regards Martin Mozilla doesn't allow screenshot attachments on the system The only group to allows this was abandoned because the moderator quit and the rules to post were untenable. Be sure to tell them to post on there own website and post a link or such places as Picasso or other sites that allow you to post images. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For one thing there will not be any more profile migrations. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Martin Freitag wrote: Philip Chee schrieb: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9.1) branch once Firefox 3.6 is out in early 2010 and Firefox 3.7 in late 2010. We had originally planned to keep 2.0 as our current branch for most of 2010. However it looks like we will need to release a 2.1 based on 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) somewhere in summer this year whether we like it or not. Is that bad? (e.g. that SM2.1 will be based on gecko 1.9.2) I guess (as a non-developer), the biggest change was the one from the old SM to the new toolkit stuff and won't cause severe changes while living in Gecko 1.9.x, especially not for the users. (like: oh, we have to abandon form-manager and half of the SM users crying, etc.) regards The ability to import/migrate *some* data (I think global history) from 1.x profiles will be lost in 1.9.2. We had hoped to have most of our 1.x users migrated to SeaMonkey 2.0 before switching to 2.1. As a workaround I guess we can make a release note for 1.x users to upgrade to 2.0 first. Other than that 1.9.2 is a significant improvement which will enable us to do more fancy stuff (if only we had the developers to do it of course). Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]%{ 1 fish, %{ 2 fish, %{ red fish, %{ blue fish * TagZilla 0.066.6 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Transfer mail from old account to new
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Phil, it's better to give the url instead of speaking about Google Teach a man to fish etc. My test using google http://www.google.com/search?hl=ensource=hpq=seamonkey+folder+pane+tools give me as the first link this page http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29t=1519805 Which, i think, is not your webpage :-) But it's a thread that leads to my webpage! Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects
Phillip Jones schrieb: One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated the site has abandoned the site. Well, what we can't do anything against and what Firefox is seeing as well is that some people disappear or decide not to maintain an add-on any more. That can happen any time. What we can possibly do something about is people actively supporting Firefox but not supporting SeaMonkey yet or any more - we are working on some campaigns to animate them to make those compatible with SeaMonkey 2.x. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Philip Chee schrieb: The ability to import/migrate *some* data (I think global history) from 1.x profiles will be lost in 1.9.2. Download history actually. From all I know, global history will work for a longer time. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
Phillip Jones wrote: [...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX]. Yup. Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with. Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly has also been mentioned. Folks who go to stupid people's sites, have to get to be smarter than those stupid people. Devils_Advocate wrote: I've run into a Bunch [of sites] that don't show up right because they are not written correctly. Martin's link in news:hice6n$a6...@news.albasani.net is the starting point. Most stupid webmasters don't even realize how stupid they are. Where does that leave me though? Reading the FAQ / Release Notes for something you use is a good practice: http://google.com/search?q=cache:QTkuBlNz5d8J:www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1+via+via+*-*-a-new-profile+Troubleshooting+via+via+Safe.Mode#troubleshooting http://tinyurl.com/VisitingBrokenWebsites http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1/ The other part of Martin's post adds a useful detail to that. Sure you may be technically right, but how can I use a browser that gives me so many blank pages? Start by making sure it's not YOU whose preferences bork things. NoOp has given a solution that has been echoed and confirmed multiple times in this thread. news:gcwdnsv6d7dountwnz2dnuvz_jji4...@mozilla.org Again, a *smart* webmaster / site builder would give you AN ERROR MESSAGE stating what is needed. :Is SM a dying product? : No, but the number of folks who understand HOW MANY ways a webmaster can screw up a web site has always been a tiny proportion of users. ...and if a site owner has built a site in a way that it will ONLY work with ONE browser and he ISN'T listening to complaints to his email, the obvious solution is to surrender to his stupidity and use the browser he prefers. Welcome to 1997. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For one thing there will not be any more profile migrations. Phil You mean if the is a 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on of SM That it will just read your current Profiles?? If so that would be wonderful Just install the new application and star right where you left off. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects
Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated the site has abandoned the site. Well, what we can't do anything against and what Firefox is seeing as well is that some people disappear or decide not to maintain an add-on any more. That can happen any time. What we can possibly do something about is people actively supporting Firefox but not supporting SeaMonkey yet or any more - we are working on some campaigns to animate them to make those compatible with SeaMonkey 2.x. Robert Kaiser I hope So. in case above both post on the Forums and post directly to tech support appears as though they went into Vapor. I not on Google there was mention because someone else took upon themselves port SkyPilot to SM two That was removed because they didn't have proper permission. Yet the aggrieved person was not interested in doing a Proper Conversion. Its as though he has lost interest. Yet doesn't want anyone to take over, even though he has lost interest. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is SM a dying product?
JeffM wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: [...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX]. Yup. Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with. Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly has also been mentioned. Folks who go to stupid people's sites, have to get to be smarter than those stupid people. Devils_Advocate wrote: I've run into a Bunch [of sites] that don't show up right because they are not written correctly. Martin's link in news:hice6n$a6...@news.albasani.net is the starting point. Most stupid webmasters don't even realize how stupid they are. Where does that leave me though? Reading the FAQ / Release Notes for something you use is a good practice: http://google.com/search?q=cache:QTkuBlNz5d8J:www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1+via+via+*-*-a-new-profile+Troubleshooting+via+via+Safe.Mode#troubleshooting http://tinyurl.com/VisitingBrokenWebsites http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1/ The other part of Martin's post adds a useful detail to that. Sure you may be technically right, but how can I use a browser that gives me so many blank pages? Start by making sure it's not YOU whose preferences bork things. NoOp has given a solution that has been echoed and confirmed multiple times in this thread. news:gcwdnsv6d7dountwnz2dnuvz_jji4...@mozilla.org Again, a *smart* webmaster / site builder would give you AN ERROR MESSAGE stating what is needed. :Is SM a dying product? : No, but the number of folks who understand HOW MANY ways a webmaster can screw up a web site has always been a tiny proportion of users. ...and if a site owner has built a site in a way that it will ONLY work with ONE browser and he ISN'T listening to complaints to his email, the obvious solution is to surrender to his stupidity and use the browser he prefers. Welcome to 1997. I've continually updated my website from time to to time. although the content itself may seem childish, hokey, or stupid, to most here (its mostly a website about my family tree and family) I've finally (I think) have got it so that it passes w3C standards for XHTML 1.0 Transitional with out any errors. So it should show up on any browser and look relatively the same. I have two instances in which I use embed tags for the same Flash Slide Show on two pages. I use DreamWeaver 8. and would like to figure out a method to do this instead of using embed. But other than those two instances it 100 compatible with XHTML 1.0 Transitional. http://www.phillipmjones.net -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.
Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server home page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the window is remembered and opened correctly in the new Tab. Shouldn't SM remember where you set the Preview pane in both cases? I can't see any difference. Maybe you can show that with a screenshot or two? regards Martin Yeah...not really sure I'm describing what I'm seeing clearly, and unless I can post a screenshot here I really don't have a way to do so. You wouldn't see this if you didn't have a preview pane set open and browse messages by opening them - I think it's really called the Message Pane, looking at the menu options. I use Classic View for Mail/News - if you have a Message Pane open browsing a subscription, go to the pane that displays the option links for account settings, search, etc. by selecting the Account name and open a tab from there; the tab will open to the same page/selection. Once you select a subscription to view the Message Pane is snapped shut and you have to drag it back open - in both tabs. The display setting for the Message Pane is not remembered and/or carried forward for the next tab. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Don't you thinkg updating SeaMonkey, Firefox or Thunderbird through the automated updates mechanism is a piece of cake? I hate automatic updates. If they work properly I love auto updates. In the past I've seen where an auto update was Bad and I ended having to go to site and download the application. On Mac its a piece of cake to replace the application with another version Drag the old application Icon (which is actually the entire application to trash open the .DMG file (Disk Image) drag the new version to application folder , double click to open and your set. I don't mind auto updates if they give me a notice and choice to say no to them - I just trashed Google Chrome for that reason...stealth updates. I don't like that about Google Earth either, but I'm putting up with it just because I mostly trust where it's coming from and who's doing it - but I don't like the way they're doing it. Yeah - manual updates on a Mac are a breeze. And I recently grabbed a couple (free!) Widgets that will review and check all of my installs (both apps and widgets) and let me know what the latest versions are and link me to where I can grab them. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.
Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server home page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the window is remembered and opened correctly in the new Tab. Shouldn't SM remember where you set the Preview pane in both cases? I can't see any difference. Maybe you can show that with a screenshot or two? regards Martin Mozilla doesn't allow screenshot attachments on the system The only group to allows this was abandoned because the moderator quit and the rules to post were untenable. Be sure to tell them to post on there own website and post a link or such places as Picasso or other sites that allow you to post images. Yeah - I figured that. This isn't a binary group...I tried to better describe what I'm seeing SEPCOR. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
Hello! I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folders/directories from my C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\News\, checked my prefs.js file (no signs of the old ones I just deleted), etc. After restarting SM and making a new acount, I still see the same problem. Am I mising something else to clean/delete? I do not have this problem on my new office machine with 64-bit Windows 7 HP (Dell OEM) with a clean install and setup from scratch. I am using an old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 at home that has the problems. I did NOT upgrade/migrate from SM v1.1.18 (just did a clean install and setup from scratch). Thank you in advance. :) -- Ladies and gentlemen, hoboes and tramps...Crosseyed Mosquitoes and bow-legged ants...I've come to tell you the story... --Bob Holman /\___/\ / /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant ( ) or ant...@zimage.com Ant is/was listening to a song on his home computer: Blizzaine - [SP] ~ Everywhere (ID: 302440) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1 Note the x86_64... That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine. Robert Kaiser Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
Interviewed by CNN on 10/1/2010 16:07, Phillip Jones told the world: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For one thing there will not be any more profile migrations. Phil You mean if the is a 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on of SM That it will just read your current Profiles?? If so that would be wonderful Just install the new application and star right where you left off. Well, let me put it this way: SM now is using the same infrastructure as Firefox and Thunderbird, and plans on keeping doing so. If FF+TB ever decide to change their profiles substantially so that a profile migration will be necessary, *they* will have to solve that headache first. And it will be a *big* headache, since there are hundreds of millions of Firefox users out there. Personally, I think they will try to find ways to make it work with the current profiles. Even if a migration is needed, by the time the need to migrate reaches Seamonkey (SM can wait a few months to a year before migrating without much of a problem) the migrating subroutines will be very well debugged. So, while there *might* be future profile migrations some time in the far future (although none in the perceived horizon), it should be way less traumatic than this one. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... BOFH excuse #261: The Usenet news is out of date * TagZilla 0.0661 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org on Seamonkey 2.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
Il se trouve que Ant a formulé : Hello! I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folders/directories from my C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\News\, checked my prefs.js file (no signs of the old ones I just deleted), etc. After restarting SM and making a new acount, I still see the same problem. Am I mising something else to clean/delete? I do not have this problem on my new office machine with 64-bit Windows 7 HP (Dell OEM) with a clean install and setup from scratch. I am using an old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 at home that has the problems. I did NOT upgrade/migrate from SM v1.1.18 (just did a clean install and setup from scratch). Thank you in advance. :) Maybe in password manager? -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Why only 8,192 entries for disk cache?
I noticed in both SeaMonkey v1.x and v2.x, its about:cache shows its number of disk cache entries can only go up to 8,192. Why is that? Is this value customizable to be higher? An example of my current SeaMonkey v2.0.1's about:cache: Disk cache device Number of entries: 8192 Maximum storage size: 614400 KiB Storage in use: 156143 KiB Cache Directory: C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\Cache Thank you in advnace. :) -- I got worms! That's what we're going to call it. We're going to specialize in selling worm farms. You know like ant farms. What's the matter, a little tense about the flight? --Lloyd Christmas (Dumb and Dumber movie) /\___/\ / /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant ( ) or ant...@zimage.com Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.
On 1/10/2010 1:43 PM PT, Bernard Mercier typed: I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folders/directories from my C:\Documents and Settings\FooBar\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\whatever123.default\News\, checked my prefs.js file (no signs of the old ones I just deleted), etc. After restarting SM and making a new acount, I still see the same problem. Am I mising something else to clean/delete? I do not have this problem on my new office machine with 64-bit Windows 7 HP (Dell OEM) with a clean install and setup from scratch. I am using an old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 at home that has the problems. I did NOT upgrade/migrate from SM v1.1.18 (just did a clean install and setup from scratch). Maybe in password manager? I don't use SM's password manager. I checked to see if there was anything in it and it was empty. I even tried reset and no changes. :( -- Remember, ants are only waiting for you to die... --unknown /\___/\ / /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant ( ) or ant...@zimage.com Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
On 01/10/2010 04:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: NoOp schrieb: Revisiting this... regarding the lack of 64bit build on linux. Decent Linux distributions offer them, no need for us to do so. Why is it that the 'nightly' builds of SeaMonkey generally include a 64bit build, but the final releases do not? Because we do have too little build power to do release builds as well, we only have one signle machine for 64bit. Robert Kaiser Sigh... I reckon my CRS is kicking in again; I should have remembered you had mentioned this once before. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Bookmarks, etc, question repost..
(This is a repost, I got no reply previously. Feel free to ask questions in case I left something pertinent out.) On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:36:32 -0500, jim j...@earthlink.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:03:31 -0800, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: snip but having the ability to quickly change path/user enmass in prefs.js is what enables me to easily transport an entire .mozilla folder to another machine have it working in a matter of minutes. Machine 1: WIn XP SP2 Seamonkey 2.01 Machine 2: WIn XP SP2 Seamonkey 2.01 I am trying to make Machine 2 have the same bookmarks and bookmarks toolbar as Machine 1. The following 1,2,3 worked fine with FF: 1. close app. 2. Locate Machine 1's places.sqlite and copy to same directory on Machine 2. 3. Reopen app on Machine 2. It does not seem to work with Seamonkey, which *appears* to grab the last backup copy of places.sqlite on Machine 2 and use that. (that is, when replaced with machine 1's Seamonkey's places.sqlite. So my question is just which parameter(s) in prefs.js do you change? jim Basically, I am starting over so I am reposting the original message. So far, Sea Monkey 2.0.1 has defeated me in this. The idea is to clone 2.01 form machine 1 (aka M1)to Machine 2 (aka M2) and the particulars of my last failures follow: 1. Uninstalled SM 2.0.1 from M2. 2. Reinstalled SM 2.0;.1 on M2 without launching after install complete. Copied entire SM profile (about 34 subdirectories) from DS in M1 to M2) 3. Prepped prefs.js by doing mass change of M1 name (jim) to M2 name (PC1) (operation detail -- Qedit reported 11 changes made, EXCEPT I did not change 2 entries specifically for IRC in Prefs.js where jim is the user name and those CMD entries did not refer to DS location) 4. Replaced places.sqlite on m2 with m1 copy. 5. started SM2 on M2. 6. Result of intended operation -- failure PLUS. The PLUS was that not only did I have no bookmarks transferred *but* the personal toolbar was also locked *and* that the personal toolbar was now locked to drag drop items from the Navigation window. (The profile copy was successful since the Adblock icon now appeared on Personal toolbar -- and was operable -- of M2 browser and all subfolders, filters and mail were present and operable in M2 SM email client.) End initial attempt at elegant symphony. :-) (it should have worked) Enter Plan B: 1. Export bookmarks from M1 to file (bookmarks.html) on shared folder on M1. 2. Import bookmarks to M2 (using manage bookmarks) 3. For that session, there were 536 objects in bookmark manager and bookmarks did exist from toolbar call of bookmarks but not on Personal Toolbar. 4. I unset and reset bookmarks toolbar as personal toolbar. Result: Personal toolbar populated with proper bookmarks and folders. BUT When i closed and reopened SM on M2, all bookmarks had disappeared. (I did Plan A and Plan B complete operations several times) Any ideas? jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
NoOp wrote: On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1 Note the x86_64... That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine. Robert Kaiser Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Oh!! Well that then prompts the question Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? -- Seasons greeting, one and all and may this year be a better one! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Back to 1.18 - More
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 10/1/2010 16:07, Phillip Jones told the world: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a product instead of installing, installing .. again and again. Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For one thing there will not be any more profile migrations. Phil You mean if the is a 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on of SM That it will just read your current Profiles?? If so that would be wonderful Just install the new application and star right where you left off. Well, let me put it this way: SM now is using the same infrastructure as Firefox and Thunderbird, and plans on keeping doing so. If FF+TB ever decide to change their profiles substantially so that a profile migration will be necessary, *they* will have to solve that headache first. And it will be a *big* headache, since there are hundreds of millions of Firefox users out there. Personally, I think they will try to find ways to make it work with the current profiles. Even if a migration is needed, by the time the need to migrate reaches Seamonkey (SM can wait a few months to a year before migrating without much of a problem) the migrating subroutines will be very well debugged. So, while there *might* be future profile migrations some time in the far future (although none in the perceived horizon), it should be way less traumatic than this one. Hurray! No more Worrying about something breaking (fingers and toes, and legs, Crossed). -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Test only
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
test
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
browsing
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
check only
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Installing SM v.2.x in a HD Partition OTHER Than c:\
HenriK wrote: My memory is that a workaround was required when one wanted to have SM v.1.x installed in a HD partition other than c:\. Does SM v.2.x also require some sort of a workaround if one desires it to be installed in a HD partition other than c:\? If so, where do I find the instructions for the workaround? Thanks in advance for the assistance. I am very appreciative of the good advice but I still am not doing something right or am a bit thick in the head. I copied the original profile location under 'Documents and Settings' on my c:\ drive (all of the stuff in the folder that has what appears to be a randomly generated name) and then pasted it to the partition where I really want these files to reside. I further pointed SeaMonkey e-mail to the new location. What has happened is quite weird. The mail now goes to the new location but the address book and the bookmarks (and perhaps other things) have remained in the original 'Documents and Settings' folder on my c:\ drive. Can anybody suggest what I might have done wrong and suggest a fix for the problem? Thanks, in advance, for suggestions and comments. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
Daniel: NoOp wrote: Right, a 64bit build looks like this: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre Oh!! Well that then prompts the question Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? Well, if you need such a version, you surely have a 64bit machine to run it on. And with such a machine you could build a 64bit version by your own and give Robert a link to it, so that he could upload it for others. :-P Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey