Is this Realy Chrome??
Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry keys, etc. Then a re-boot into Win7 again, and I was being offered to install RealPlayer and was given the option to make Chrome my default browser, which I de-selected. Just for something to do, I selected Help-About SeaMonkey and Help-About Plug-ins, and, in the Plug-ins listing, I noticed RealNetworks(tm) RealPlayer Chrome Background Extension Plug-In (32-bit) Does this mean I've ended up with a bit of Chrome being installed even though I de-selected it during the RealPlayer installation. -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
Ant schrieb: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
On 6/22/2011 6:28 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. Aww. :( -- The eyeless ant asked God, 'Give me eye-lashes.' --Georgian Proverb /\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WHY ?
Rick Merrill wrote: Paul wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911 Its your browser doing that. You can change its settings to download all of them if you want, but thats a lot of downloading. Yes, The 500 is a suggested limit to prevent downloading all the old ones. You've just added this group I'm guessing. NO NO ... I have this group for years the problem is not 500, it's 61911 The problem is ..This group is working very well every days But sometimes i got this stupid situation. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't download to install SM2.0 extensions on a clean/new installed SM2.1?
On 6/22/11 5:50 AM, Ant wrote: Hi! Yesterday, I was messing with a new/clean installation of SM v2.1 in a XP Pro. SP2 (IE6) virtual machine at work to see which of my current extensions work or not. I decided to try the latest PrefBar extension first from http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/installation.html, but it kept showing the wrong language web page (https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/; manually force to use /en/ instead of /de/). It also refused to install XPI file (versions don't match) from https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/downloads/latest/67148/addon-67148-latest.xpi?src=addon-detail ... How do you force a download to install in SM2.1? Sheesh. Good thing I didn't do this on my production installatios and machines! :( Thank you in advance. :) You can't install PrefBar 5.1.1 into SeaMonkey 2.1 without tweaking the XPI file. 1. Download the XPI file. On https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/, place your cursor over the Add to SeaMonkey button, right-click, select Save Link Target As from the pull-down context menu, and navigate in the file-save window to where you can save the file. 2. The XPI file is actually a zip file. Launch your favorite zip application (e.g., WinZip). Drag the XPI file into the blank zip window. 3. View file install.rdf in a text editor. Right-click on install.rdf and select View from the pull-down context menu. (I have WinZip view it in WordPad.) 4. In install.rdf, locate the line !-- SeaMonkey -- Just under it, locate the line beginning em:maxVersion Change the version to 2.1 or 2.*. Save. (DO NOT use Save As.) Close the text editor. 5. With WinZip, I get a dialogue popup asking if I want to update the archive? The answer is (of course) Yes. With some other zip application, the result should be similar. After somehow incorporating the modified install.rdf back into the XPI file, close your zip application. Now you should be able to install PrefBar. Note that a Mozdev bug report already exists to request PrefBar be made installable in SeaMonkey 2.1. Also note that setting the em:maxVersion to 2.* might not work with a pending update to the Add-ons Manager. I'm not sure, but I think the new Add-ons Manager will reject wild-cards in version numbers. Fortunately, that version of Add-ons Manager is not yet part of SeaMonkey. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is this Realy Chrome??
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 10:08, Daniel told the world: Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry keys, etc. Then a re-boot into Win7 again, and I was being offered to install RealPlayer and was given the option to make Chrome my default browser, which I de-selected. Just for something to do, I selected Help-About SeaMonkey and Help-About Plug-ins, and, in the Plug-ins listing, I noticed RealNetworks(tm) RealPlayer Chrome Background Extension Plug-In (32-bit) Does this mean I've ended up with a bit of Chrome being installed even though I de-selected it during the RealPlayer installation. Well, first, this is a RealPlayer question, not a Seamonkey question. But anyway... Second, I strongly doubt that you got offered RealPlayer as part of the Microsoft updates. What probably happened is that RealPlayer's own autoupdate took the opportunity to download its own version. Third, no, I wouldn't call the Chrome Background Extension Plug-In as a part of Chrome. What it means is that RealPlayer has made available in your computer a plug-in to integrate itself on Chrome. If you later decide you do want to install Chrome, it will (probably) autodetect the plugin, saving you the work of re-installing RealPlayer. This is not an unprecedented behavior in major plugins; Adobe's Flash and Adobe Reader both install their plugins in a general Windows location and publish their existence in the Registry, for instance -- so if you later install a new browser, they will work from the get-go. Some antivirus packages will also pre-install browser extensions (toolbars and such). Yes, it's intrusive. Yes, it's borderline foistware. OTOH, it makes the life easier for millions of non-technical users, who expect their new browser to be able to handle PDFs and RealMedia -- after all, they had already installed Adobe Reader and RealPlayer, didn't they? It worked perfectly with IE... So, in a way, this helps alternative browser distributors, since the the new browser has better functionality from the start. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my HP 41-CX. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Advertise Firefox compatibility:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world: wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in seamonkey... Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Deep Thought. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Advertise Firefox compatibility:
JeffM wrote: sean nathan bean wrote: it displays no problem, but won't let me install the firefox compatible addon... The version numbers of SeaMonkey are at least one integer behind Firefox. If an extension checks for a version number upon installation, first, you better assure that the version numbers line up. i'm new to user agent sniff/spoofing ... when i click to dowload the plugin from fbpurity.com site, the addon popup tells me it isn't compatible with seamonkey 2.1 ... so which about config file do i need to change... ? or is this not the intent of advertising firefox compatibility? recent old laptop triage events have knocked my computer semi-pro status for several loops of late... sean -- ... A nudist is just a person in a one-button suit. * TagZilla 0.066 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey version same as Firefox
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Advertise Firefox compatibility:
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world: wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in seamonkey... Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject. t'was afraid of that.. nightly tester tools works differently now... allowed installation of jslib and tagzilla, but not quote colors norfbpurity... oh well... any pointers on addon/extension compatibility? sean -- ... I have noticed that the people who are late are often so much jollier than the people who have to wait for them * TagZilla 0.066 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4. I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0. Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be? Bob ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey version same as Firefox
On 6/22/11 9:48 AM, AlainF wrote: Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx. That would break a number of extensions and other add-ons that indicate maximum SeaMonkey versions in the region of 2.x. The use of 5.0 as the version number for a security update to Firefox 4.0 has already broken extensions according to the Slashdo article at http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/06/22/172229/No-Additional-Firefox-4-Security-Updates. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Advertise Firefox compatibility:
On 6/22/11 10:19 AM, sean nathan bean wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world: wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in seamonkey... Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject. t'was afraid of that.. nightly tester tools works differently now... allowed installation of jslib and tagzilla, but not quote colors norfbpurity... oh well... any pointers on addon/extension compatibility? sean For extensions (XPI files), see my reply earlier today in this newsgroup under the subject Can't download to install SM2.0 extensions on a clean/new installed SM2.1? Note that this will not always work because some XPI files resist editing. I believe the compatibility of plugins (DLL files) rests primarily with the version of your operating system and only slightly with the version of your browser. I would be surprised if many plugins even check the version of your browser. However, they often do check the brand (e.g., IE, Chome, Firefox, SeaMonkey). The difference arises from the fact that Add-ons Manager -- a component of Firefox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird, etc -- handles the installation of extensions while your operating system handles the installation of plugins. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Upgrade problem from version 1.1.18 to 2.1 (Windows XP)
I just tried this upgrade but was never asked which profile should be migrated. The new installation is completely bare, with nothing carried over from 1.1.18. The official installation instructions may apply just to upgrades from 2.0 to 2.1; they don't provide any special instructions or cautions about upgrading from 1.1.18. I followed the instructions for importing my bookmarks; it asked which profile and then reported success, but the bookmarks haven't shown up in 2.1. Fortunately 1.1.18 is still operational! Should I uninstall 2.1 and just start over, or is there some interim step I missed? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Ant schrieb: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. I still see (once in a while) a security patch land in mozilla-1.9.1. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey version same as Firefox
AlainF wrote: Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx. It's a common misconception that SeaMonkey is based on Firefox. It's based on the Mozilla platform, which includes Gecko (the rendering engine), which in turn appears in the User Agent string of all Mozilla products (among them Firefox, Thunderbird and SeaMonkey). Starting with Firefox 5, the version of Gecko will match that of Firefox, though. Still, every group behind a product can decide on their own versioning theme. The Thunderbird developers chose to follow Firefox, making a jump from 3.1 to 5.0. The SeaMonkey developers however decided to continue with the established versioning theme while otherwise jumping on the rapid release train. That means that releases will be quicker, but the decision on what deserves a new major version will be independent from that. Personally I think having half a dozen new major versions a year is totally stupid. In a few years, Firefox and Thunderbird will be in the 20-30 range if they continue this way, and I think that just looks ridiculous. I guess they will some day either revise their decision or adapt yet another versioning theme (of which there are plenty; personally I think only somehow including the release year is future-proof, think Ubuntu). Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Ant schrieb: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. I still see (once in a while) a security patch land in mozilla-1.9.1. Well... Quoting from https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2011/06/21/firefox-3-6-18-security-update-now-available/: Please note: Firefox 3.5 is no longer receiving security and stability releases. Remaining Firefox 3.5 users will receive an automated update notification for Firefox 3.6.18 as well. I'd say that's pretty clear. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Advertise Firefox compatibility [and incompatible extension]
MCBastos wrote: Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. I call those Web pages constructed by idiots but you're a more kind and gentle soul than I am. Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject. I'm a one-step-at-a-time kind of guy. The OP *could* have **downloaded** the XPI (I'm ASSuMEing; I didn't go to the page[1]) then **installed** the extension from his own HDD. At that point the website is out of the picture and the failure mode becomes more obvious. I recommed this technique for those having problems. DO right-click and **download** when the option is available. . . [1] ...and if the actual link to the downloadable file *wasn't* available and was instead buried behind scripting, THAT would be the kind of thing that gives me a rash. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Ant schrieb: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. I still see (once in a while) a security patch land in mozilla-1.9.1. Some people, not Mozilla are doing *some* security updates; I am unsure of the quality of code, testing scheme, or even quantity of fixes there. I would not feel comfortable shipping a 2.0.x based release without Mozilla shipping a similar gecko release of Firefox, and they are not. If a Linux distro however wants to ship a newer SeaMonkey based on some ported security fixes, I have no objection, as that is their prerogative as a Linux Distro (c.f. iceweasel, etc.) -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WHY ?
Ray_Net wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Paul wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911 Its your browser doing that. You can change its settings to download all of them if you want, but thats a lot of downloading. Yes, The 500 is a suggested limit to prevent downloading all the old ones. You've just added this group I'm guessing. NO NO ... I have this group for years the problem is not 500, it's 61911 The problem is ..This group is working very well every days But sometimes i got this stupid situation. Don't know if it works on PC's, but on Mac's you click and hold on the group name (I use the three pane mode.) and a context menu comes up choose Properties: you'll this http://screencast.com/t/qYVHSoyN (i use a different theme so the look may be different) click on the item I have arrow pointing to. Then you'll get this window http://screencast.com/t/iobsnPEz type in the amount of message headers you actually want to download. it will remain set at that. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
Bob Fleischer schrieb: My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4. I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0. Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be? None, neither any available browser nor the operating system are still maintained for PowerPC Macs, unfortunately. Well, she can try installing Debian Linux, they should still support PowerPC architectures and compile IceApe for it. Or, if she only needs a browser, TenFourFox might work. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will SeaMonkey v2.0.x be getting any more updates after its v2.0.14?
Philip Chee schrieb: On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Ant schrieb: I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not ready for v2.1.x yet. Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is based on. I still see (once in a while) a security patch land in mozilla-1.9.1. The once in a while is important there. Nobody is caring that everything is being backported or that anything happens to security problems reported on that branch. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Release of Firefox 5???
Team, How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch? Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon? Ant. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Release of Firefox 5???
Antman008 wrote: Team, How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch? Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon? Ant. Sorry, that should have read 2.2. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.2 Beta 1 Release -- Introduces New Features
SeaMonkey 2.2 Beta 1 is available for free download [1] now in 14 languages and makes a list of new functionality available to a wider testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release version is still intended for testers only and might still show some problems in everyday use. As always, we appreciate any feedback you may have and encourage users to help us by filing bugs. This version is built on top of Gecko 5 and features the following new improvements: CSS Animations [2] are now supported. Improved canvas, JavaScript, memory, and networking performance. Improved standards support for HTML5, XHR, MathML, SMIL, and canvas. Improved spell checking for some locales. WebGL content can no longer load cross-domain textures. [3] Background tabs have setTimeout and setInterval clamped to 1000ms to improve performance. [4] The changes page [5] lists a more detailed overview of new features and fixes relative to our last stable release, SeaMonkey 2.1. [6] We welcome any and all discussions on this beta on our newsgroups, or you can even file a bug if you find one. Be sure to check our Known Issues prior to filing bugs. SeaMonkey 2.2 Beta 1 is available for free download on the SeaMonkey website. Once you have downloaded and installed this release, we'd like to encourage you to get involved in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. Thanks for testing and helping us to make SeaMonkey even better! Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.2b1 [2] - https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/CSS_animations [3] - http://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/06/cross-domain-webgl-textures-disabled-in-firefox-5/ [4] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633421 [5] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.2/changes [6] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/ -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) (If I forgot any helpful links, sorry, will correct in replies to m.d.a.seamonkey) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Release of Firefox 5???
Antman008 wrote: How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch? Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon? Sorry, that should have read 2.2. SM 2.2b1 was released today; 2.2 final is expected next week or the week after. Both are based on the same platform as FF 5 and mostly contain only fixes for the suite side of things. After that, we'll have 2.3 (FF 6, currently Aurora) and 2.4 (FF 7, currently trunk), each ~6-8 weeks from each other (ETA). HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: stumbleupon addon won't load for 2.1
Stan wrote: TmoWizard wrote: Stan schrieb: I can't ignore the message because the SM Add-Ons Manager marked Stumble 3.91 as Disabled when I switched over to SM 2.1 yesterday. In about:config you must set /extensions.checkCompatibility/ from *true* to *false* and it works. Please install the Add-on /Add-on Compatibility Reporter/ from Mozilla https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api and mark StumpleUppon as *Works properly*, it helps the Autors from Add-ons, Mozilla and at the End us Users from SeaMonkey or ather Gecko-Browsers! Stan Mike Regarding: In about:config you must set /extensions.checkCompatibility/ from *true* to *false* and it works. I don't even have this entry in about:config. Stan ... yeah, but you still get what you paid for! b ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
Bob Fleischer wrote: [...]Mac OS 10.4. Apple: The new Borg. I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0. Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be? http://distrowatch.com/search.php?architecture=powerpcstatus=Active ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
Bob Fleischer wrote: [...]Mac OS 10.4. Apple: The new Borg. I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0. Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be? http://distrowatch.com/search.php?architecture=powerpcstatus=Active Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?), and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?). -- Thanks! 73, KD4E David Colburn http://kd4e.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day I don't google I SEARCH! STARTPAGE.com Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey-Mailwasher
My first post. Please be kind. I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to Mailwasher Pro 2011. I am using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after it has downloaded my Email, it can't find it. I need to manually enter the address of the Seamonkey email application so it will always go there, but I have no clue what it is. Anybody have an address? Mickey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?), and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?). So who is IBM? :-) -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. Infnord practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey-Mailwasher
Ross Simon wrote: My first post. Please be kind. I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to Mailwasher Pro 2011. I am using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after it has downloaded my Email, it can't find it. I need to manually enter the address of the Seamonkey email application so it will always go there, but I have no clue what it is. Anybody have an address? Mickey Are you looking for something like this to put in the options or preferences of Mailwasher? c:\Program Files\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe -mail -P profile name If you have only one profile then you won't need -P profile name. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
Miles Fidelman wrote: d...@kd4e.com wrote: Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?), and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?). So who is IBM? :-) A shadow of the former Klingon empire? -- Thanks! 73, KD4E David Colburn http://kd4e.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day I don't google I SEARCH! STARTPAGE.com Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a Power PC Mac user to do?
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: d...@kd4e.com wrote: Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?), and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?). So who is IBM? :-) A shadow of the former Klingon empire? I don't know, given what Microsoft, Apple, and now Google have been up to, IBM is starting to look like the good guys :-) -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. Infnord practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
CONGRATULATIONS, Seamonkey development crew, and contributing community members. Your extraordinary work is certainly appreciated. I am proud to be a Seamonkey User. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
