Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-06 Thread Ray_Net

David E. Ross wrote, On 06/08/2013 05:22:

On 8/5/13 5:08 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote, On 06/08/2013 01:51:

On 8/5/13 9:59 AM, hawker wrote:

On 8/5/2013 12:37 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

hawker wrote:


No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.

Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
   charset=ISO-8859-1
 p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
   mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
   behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
   in which it
   is placed.o:p/o:p/p
followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
(including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.


I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
*one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
and looked at the source code.

Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
technology)

What I think is happening...

1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
as HTML
2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
rest of the HTML-formatted message.
4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
proprietary garbage and fails horribly

The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.


Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on
in a way I can understand.
I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand
the issue.

What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an
e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a
specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting,
bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first
means I have to re-apply all the formatting.

I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things
up as you suggest without loosing the formating.

I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html


Good point.
I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it
is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be
forwarded and reused without any issues (like the attachment loosing the
in line status). I think keeping the text as text is probably the best
way to do this.


Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the PDF
file to the E-mail message.


A pdf version is like a screen-copy ... a detour instead of the real
cure of the problem.
The real question is (not easy) : What must be done in SM to permit for
only Outlook user a correct reading of a mail including a copy/paste
from Word ?

I have really no idea of feasability.


You are suggesting that the Mozilla E-mail components be modified to
accomodate the behavior of a Microsoft product when E-mail applications
of other developers -- neither Mozilla nor Microsoft -- do not need such
a change to Mozilla's components.

Yest. BUTWhen i say i have really no idea of feasability i 
underlining think, that there is no solutions, just detours ...

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-06 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/6/13 1:27 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:



Whether SeaMonkey's HTML component is hopelessly borked is not my
problem. If we assume that Thunderbird does not exhibit this behaviour
when sending mail to Outlook, 


I'm not sure anyone has verified the behavior on multiple SM platforms
even, let alone tried T-Bird.  The thread pretty much went blame-game
from day 1.


Well, it pretty much goes without saying that SM is not sanitizing its 
input. Any programmer worth his/her weight in salt knows that input 
validation is crucial to ensuring that the data output has even a 
minimal chance of being okay. The question isn't whether SM is doing it 
wrong (it most assuredly is), but whether the problem is SM-specific or 
is deeper, i.e., Mozilla Core.



I can't test/verify it of course, I don't have Word or Outlook.  The
paste without formatting suggestion seemed to be the best answer.


I'm in the same boat: On a Mac, no Word or Outlook.


I would have thought the MS Word writes horrible code issue was well
known enough ten years ago, that people didn't even try to paste it into
another program anymore.


People need to understand that what is bad code on the outside is 
nothing more than Word mark-up on the inside. You can't /really/ blame 
MS or Word for how the clipboard treats the HTML out of Word, but it 
does bring to light a very interesting question: Why can Outlook users 
paste from Word docs and they send/receive without issue? I can only 
assume that Outlook sanitizes the outgoing HTML, but it's not something 
I can easily verify.


It would be interesting to understand why Word-Outlook-Outlook works and 
yet Word-SeaMonkey-Outlook doesn't. Meanwhile, people will forever paste 
from any program to any other program. Why? Because it's supposed to 
work that way.


trane
--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-06 Thread Geoff Welsh

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/6/13 1:27 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:



Whether SeaMonkey's HTML component is hopelessly borked is not my
problem. If we assume that Thunderbird does not exhibit this behaviour
when sending mail to Outlook, 


I'm not sure anyone has verified the behavior on multiple SM platforms
even, let alone tried T-Bird. The thread pretty much went blame-game
from day 1.


Well, it pretty much goes without saying that SM is not sanitizing its
input. Any programmer worth his/her weight in salt knows that input
validation is crucial to ensuring that the data output has even a
minimal chance of being okay. The question isn't whether SM is doing it
wrong (it most assuredly is), but whether the problem is SM-specific or
is deeper, i.e., Mozilla Core.


I can't test/verify it of course, I don't have Word or Outlook. The
paste without formatting suggestion seemed to be the best answer.


I'm in the same boat: On a Mac, no Word or Outlook.


I would have thought the MS Word writes horrible code issue was well
known enough ten years ago, that people didn't even try to paste it into
another program anymore.


People need to understand that what is bad code on the outside is
nothing more than Word mark-up on the inside. You can't /really/ blame
MS or Word for how the clipboard treats the HTML out of Word, but it
does bring to light a very interesting question: Why can Outlook users
paste from Word docs and they send/receive without issue? I can only
assume that Outlook sanitizes the outgoing HTML, but it's not something
I can easily verify.

It would be interesting to understand why Word-Outlook-Outlook works and
yet Word-SeaMonkey-Outlook doesn't. Meanwhile, people will forever paste
from any program to any other program. Why? Because it's supposed to
work that way.

trane


I envy your supposed to work reality.

IME, Apple wants you to use all Apple stuff, and MS does same.  Those of 
us who venture off into the wild blue yonder and use an open source 
internet suite need to learn a few tricks here and there, like not 
pasting formatted things inline when we know it won't work.


AFAIC. how it's supposed to work, is the email body is for text only, 
and you can attach files or link to web pages things from there.


But I don't bother mentioning that from the start because supposed to 
work never helps anybody.


f/u set 2 moz.gen
GW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Ray_Net

Ed Mullen wrote, On 05/08/2013 01:43:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 04/08/2013 12:14:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2013 13:23:

Ray_Net wrote:

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that
when I
cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting
standard
text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients. Any ideas what
causes
this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on 
Outlook is

not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we 
think. If

it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your
text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks 
fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not 
look

correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid 
workaround

for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the
majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We
can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use.
Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken,
compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the
this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group
the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking
responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data
from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that
someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data 
from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that 
Seamonky

WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey
that
seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess 
is it

is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.

Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the
best.
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to
read
it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft
developpers
will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.


Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other
mail clients.

So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera,
etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must*
blame SM  *NOT*


So what ? Will his problem be corrected ?


SM is not breaking this situation, SM is not making the problem so get
MS to fix their situation!!


And MS will say .If you use Word-Copy and Outlook-Paste, then
send the mail, All will be ok, It's SM that kills the Clipboard data.


If you look at it from MS's perspective, as Word as a do-all text 
processor for documents, text, and HTML, then it makes some sense.  
Not a lot, but /some/.


Assuming (as Word does) that you /might/ be composing an HTML doc, 
when you highlight, hit Copy, Word assumes you want to also copy all 
the underlying code along with the text.  Okay, in our discussion 
here, we do NOT want ANY of the underlying code. Still, for users who 
don't know any better and who use Word to make HTML files this makes 
some sense.


Of course, in the real world (people who actually know what the hell 
they're doing) it makes no sense at all.


I'm not certain of the underlying code and functions in SeaMonkey but 
I suspect that SM is doing what it probably should:  Pasting what's on 
the Windows clipboard (put there by Word) ... INCLUDING all the crap 
that MS Word includes.


The not-so-elegant answer is to do what's been suggested up-thread: 
Copy from Word, paste into a plain-text editor (Notepad etc.), 
highlight, copy, then paste into SM.


Arguing about who's right or wrong doesn't solve the issue.  This does.


Yes, but most of the time, i, also, forgot to do the extra step going 
thru notepad :-)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Rob
When you clearly don't understand how the Windows clipboard works, and
what functions are available both in Word and in Seamonkey to influence
what will be done, why do you go on accusing Microsoft of malversations?

Wouldn't it be more reasonable to first study the matter?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Philip Taylor


nom...@example.com wrote:

 When you clearly don't understand how the Windows clipboard works, and
 what functions are available both in Word and in Seamonkey to influence
 what will be done, why do you go on accusing Microsoft of malversations?

In the absence of any context, it is unclear to whom you refers.
Whilst I whole-heartedly approve of your trimming (an example that I
sincerely wish others would emulate), I do feel that you have over-done
it on this occasion.

But to return to the matter under debate :  When you refer to functions
available in Word and functions available in Seamonkey, it is unclear
to what functions you refer.  Word offers Copy and Seamonkey offers
Paste and Paste without formatting.  Only the third of these appears
to offer any hope of ameliorating the situation, but that would (by
definition) lose the very thing that the orginal enquirer seeks to
retain.  So could you explain, perhaps by example, exactly to which
features of Word and Seamonkey you refer ?

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 9:02 PM, Iceman wrote:

On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:14:08 -0400, hawker wrote in message
news:sn2dnyqt-sb9dwbmnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org:


I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


How about just mailing the Word document as an attachment? You can put it
in a zipfile first, to reduce size.



Well what I often have to do for work is discuss something going on, and 
there may be some text or data from a word document - say a 
specification that I want to past in. Often it has formatting, bold, 
number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first means I 
have to re-apply all the formatting.  Attaching a snipped of word is not 
very clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

hawker wrote:


No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.


Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1
  p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
in which it
is placed.o:p/o:p/p
followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
(including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.




I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
*one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
and looked at the source code.

Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
technology)

What I think is happening...

1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
as HTML
2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
rest of the HTML-formatted message.
4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
proprietary garbage and fails horribly

The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.



Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on 
in a way I can understand.
I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand 
the issue.


What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an 
e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a 
specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting, 
bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first 
means I have to re-apply all the formatting.


I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things 
up as you suggest without loosing the formating.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread BIll Spikowski
hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:
 Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
 hawker wrote:

 No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
 an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
 WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
 from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
 that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
 is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.

 Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
 the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
 example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
 HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
 charset=ISO-8859-1
   p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
 mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
 behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
 in which it
 is placed.o:p/o:p/p
 followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
 (including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

 The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
 quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.



 I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
 *one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
 it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
 and looked at the source code.

 Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
 easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
 like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
 by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
 technology)

 What I think is happening...

 1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
 as HTML
 2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
 3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
 rest of the HTML-formatted message.
 4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
 the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
 5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
 proprietary garbage and fails horribly

 The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
 code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
 through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
 to clean it up.

 
 Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on 
 in a way I can understand.
 I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand 
 the issue.
 
 What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an 
 e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a 
 specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting, 
 bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first 
 means I have to re-apply all the formatting.
 
 I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things 
 up as you suggest without loosing the formating.


I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread hawker

On 8/5/2013 12:37 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

hawker wrote:


No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.


Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
 charset=ISO-8859-1
   p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
 mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
 behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
 in which it
 is placed.o:p/o:p/p
followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
(including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.




I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
*one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
and looked at the source code.

Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
technology)

What I think is happening...

1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
as HTML
2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
rest of the HTML-formatted message.
4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
proprietary garbage and fails horribly

The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.



Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on
in a way I can understand.
I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand
the issue.

What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an
e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a
specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting,
bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first
means I have to re-apply all the formatting.

I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things
up as you suggest without loosing the formating.



I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html



Good point.
I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it 
is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be 
forwarded and reused without any issues (like the attachment loosing the 
in line status). I think keeping the text as text is probably the best 
way to do this.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread David E. Ross
On 8/5/13 9:59 AM, hawker wrote:
 On 8/5/2013 12:37 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:
 hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:
 Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
 hawker wrote:

 No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
 an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
 WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
 from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
 that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
 is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.

 Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
 the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
 example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
 HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
  charset=ISO-8859-1
p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
  mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
  behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
  in which it
  is placed.o:p/o:p/p
 followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
 (including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

 The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
 quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.



 I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
 *one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
 it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
 and looked at the source code.

 Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
 easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
 like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
 by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
 technology)

 What I think is happening...

 1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
 as HTML
 2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
 3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
 rest of the HTML-formatted message.
 4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
 the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
 5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
 proprietary garbage and fails horribly

 The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
 code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
 through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
 to clean it up.


 Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on
 in a way I can understand.
 I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand
 the issue.

 What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an
 e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a
 specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting,
 bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first
 means I have to re-apply all the formatting.

 I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things
 up as you suggest without loosing the formating.


 I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
 you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
 screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html

 
 Good point.
 I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it 
 is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be 
 forwarded and reused without any issues (like the attachment loosing the 
 in line status). I think keeping the text as text is probably the best 
 way to do this.
 

Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the PDF
file to the E-mail message.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Concerned about someone (e.g., the government)
snooping into your E-mail?  Use PGP.
See my http://www.rossde.com/PGP/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Ray_Net

David E. Ross wrote, On 06/08/2013 01:51:

On 8/5/13 9:59 AM, hawker wrote:

On 8/5/2013 12:37 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

hawker wrote:


No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.

Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
  charset=ISO-8859-1
p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
  mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
  behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
  in which it
  is placed.o:p/o:p/p
followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
(including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.



I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
*one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
and looked at the source code.

Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
technology)

What I think is happening...

1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
as HTML
2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
rest of the HTML-formatted message.
4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
proprietary garbage and fails horribly

The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.


Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on
in a way I can understand.
I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand
the issue.

What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an
e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a
specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting,
bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first
means I have to re-apply all the formatting.

I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things
up as you suggest without loosing the formating.


I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html


Good point.
I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it
is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be
forwarded and reused without any issues (like the attachment loosing the
in line status). I think keeping the text as text is probably the best
way to do this.


Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the PDF
file to the E-mail message.

A pdf version is like a screen-copy ... a detour instead of the real 
cure of the problem.
The real question is (not easy) : What must be done in SM to permit for 
only Outlook user a correct reading of a mail including a copy/paste 
from Word ?


I have really no idea of feasability.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Geoff Welsh

David E. Ross wrote:

 hawker wrote:


I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it
is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be
forwarded and reused without any issues...


Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the PDF
file to the E-mail message.



+1
GW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

David E. Ross wrote:


On 8/5/13 9:59 AM, hawker wrote:


Good point.
I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability,
but it is for business and should remain looking professional and
be able to be forwarded and reused without any issues (like the
attachment losing the in line status). I think keeping the text as
text is probably the best way to do this.



Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the
PDF file to the E-mail message.


If you're going that route, you don't need to attach the whole PDF 
(especially in case of a large file with only a small area of interest). 
Just use Adobe's snapshot tool to select and copy an image of the 
relevant part of the page, and paste it into your email as a graphic.


Note: The resolution of the resulting image depends on the zoom level in 
Adobe Acrobat. If the area you want to capture is large and hard to 
select at a high zoom level, zoom out to select it with the snapshot 
tool, then zoom in to say 400% and do CTRL-C (or Mac equivalent) to copy 
the same region at higher resolution (it remains selected until you 
release it). When you paste it into SeaMonkey, you may have to resize 
it, but you won't lose the resolution.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/6/13 9:08 AM +0900, Ray_Net wrote:


A pdf version is like a screen-copy ... a detour instead of the real
cure of the problem.
The real question is (not easy) : What must be done in SM to permit for
only Outlook user a correct reading of a mail including a copy/paste
from Word ?


If I had to hazard a guess, I suspect that SeaMonkey would need to have 
its HTML mail tightened up to ensure that it sanitized any HTML being 
pasted into an e-mail. So, the problem is on both ends: Outlook is too 
dense to properly ignore the non-standard HTML tags, and SeaMonkey isn't 
doing its job in ensuring that the HTML being sent is legit.


Is it doable? Yes. Those bothered by the problem should drop by Bugzilla 
and submit a bug.


Cheers,

trane
--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Trane Francks wrote:


On 8/6/13 9:08 AM +0900, Ray_Net wrote:


A pdf version is like a screen-copy ... a detour instead of the real
cure of the problem.
The real question is (not easy) : What must be done in SM to permit for
only Outlook user a correct reading of a mail including a copy/paste
from Word ?


If I had to hazard a guess, I suspect that SeaMonkey would need to have
its HTML mail tightened up to ensure that it sanitized any HTML being
pasted into an e-mail. So, the problem is on both ends: Outlook is too
dense to properly ignore the non-standard HTML tags, and SeaMonkey isn't
doing its job in ensuring that the HTML being sent is legit.

Is it doable? Yes. Those bothered by the problem should drop by Bugzilla
and submit a bug.


You may not be aware, but Composer (the HTML composition app in the 
SeaMonkey suite) was abandoned years ago and is no longer maintained, 
but is still used to support HTML mail composition. So any bug you file 
against it is unlikely to get a response.


If it's really important to you to get clean, W3C-compliant code, you 
should compose it elsewhere and copy/paste it into the SM message 
(Insert... HTML). But for most practical purposes, it's probably more 
trouble than it's worth.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread David E. Ross
On 8/5/13 5:08 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
 David E. Ross wrote, On 06/08/2013 01:51:
 On 8/5/13 9:59 AM, hawker wrote:
 On 8/5/2013 12:37 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:
 hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 8:14 PM, MCBastos wrote:
 Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
 hawker wrote:

 No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
 an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
 WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
 from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
 that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
 is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.
 Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all
 the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For
 example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an
 HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:

 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
   charset=ISO-8859-1
 p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
   mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
   behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the 
 conditions
   in which it
   is placed.o:p/o:p/p
 followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters
 (including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!

 The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly
 quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.


 I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
 *one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
 it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
 and looked at the source code.

 Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
 easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
 like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
 by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
 technology)

 What I think is happening...

 1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
 as HTML
 2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
 3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
 rest of the HTML-formatted message.
 4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
 the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
 5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
 proprietary garbage and fails horribly

 The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
 code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
 through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
 to clean it up.

 Thank you for being the first person to fully explain what is going on
 in a way I can understand.
 I'm still not sure what my best solution is but now I better understand
 the issue.

 What I often have to do for work is discuss something going on in an
 e-mail, and there may be some text or data from a word document - say a
 specification or chart that I want to past in. Often it has formatting,
 bold, number list etc that I want to preserve so copying to text first
 means I have to re-apply all the formatting.

 I wonder if there are any other formatted programs that can clean things
 up as you suggest without loosing the formating.

 I've been assuming that you need to preserve the editability of what
 you pull from Word. If not, why not just attach a screenshot? Or use
 screen capture software like Snagit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.html

 Good point.
 I don't know that I necessarily need to preserve the editability, but it
 is for business and should remain looking professional and be able to be
 forwarded and reused without any issues (like the attachment loosing the
 in line status). I think keeping the text as text is probably the best
 way to do this.

 Consider printing from Word to a PDF file and then attaching the PDF
 file to the E-mail message.

 A pdf version is like a screen-copy ... a detour instead of the real 
 cure of the problem.
 The real question is (not easy) : What must be done in SM to permit for 
 only Outlook user a correct reading of a mail including a copy/paste 
 from Word ?
 
 I have really no idea of feasability.
 

You are suggesting that the Mozilla E-mail components be modified to
accomodate the behavior of a Microsoft product when E-mail applications
of other developers -- neither Mozilla nor Microsoft -- do not need such
a change to Mozilla's components.

-- 
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

Concerned about someone (e.g., the government)
snooping into your E-mail?  Use PGP.
See my http://www.rossde.com/PGP/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/6/13 11:51 AM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


You may not be aware, but Composer (the HTML composition app in the
SeaMonkey suite) was abandoned years ago and is no longer maintained,
but is still used to support HTML mail composition. So any bug you file
against it is unlikely to get a response.

If it's really important to you to get clean, W3C-compliant code, you
should compose it elsewhere and copy/paste it into the SM message
(Insert... HTML). But for most practical purposes, it's probably more
trouble than it's worth.



Whether SeaMonkey's HTML component is hopelessly borked is not my 
problem. If we assume that Thunderbird does not exhibit this behaviour 
when sending mail to Outlook, SM devs would do well to examine the issue.


It's not my bug, mind. I'm not the OP, so if somebody else wants to 
submit a bug, more power to 'em. I've got my own collection of bugs 
about which to worry. :)


Cheers,

trane
--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Geoff Welsh

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/6/13 11:51 AM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


You may not be aware, but Composer (the HTML composition app in the
SeaMonkey suite) was abandoned years ago and is no longer maintained,
but is still used to support HTML mail composition. So any bug you file
against it is unlikely to get a response.

If it's really important to you to get clean, W3C-compliant code, you
should compose it elsewhere and copy/paste it into the SM message
(Insert... HTML). But for most practical purposes, it's probably more
trouble than it's worth.



Whether SeaMonkey's HTML component is hopelessly borked is not my
problem. If we assume that Thunderbird does not exhibit this behaviour
when sending mail to Outlook, 


I'm not sure anyone has verified the behavior on multiple SM platforms 
even, let alone tried T-Bird.  The thread pretty much went blame-game 
from day 1.


I can't test/verify it of course, I don't have Word or Outlook.  The 
paste without formatting suggestion seemed to be the best answer.


I would have thought the MS Word writes horrible code issue was well 
known enough ten years ago, that people didn't even try to paste it into 
another program anymore.


GW

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-05 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Trane Francks wrote:


On 8/6/13 11:51 AM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


You may not be aware, but Composer (the HTML composition app in the
SeaMonkey suite) was abandoned years ago and is no longer maintained,
but is still used to support HTML mail composition. So any bug you file
against it is unlikely to get a response.

If it's really important to you to get clean, W3C-compliant code, you
should compose it elsewhere and copy/paste it into the SM message
(Insert... HTML). But for most practical purposes, it's probably more
trouble than it's worth.



Whether SeaMonkey's HTML component is hopelessly borked is not my
problem. If we assume that Thunderbird does not exhibit this behaviour
when sending mail to Outlook, SM devs would do well to examine the issue.


If it does, I agree, but I have no way of knowing since I don't have TB. 
(my last chest X-ray was clear ;-) )


The HTML component of which we speak is not the one that renders web 
pages in the browser, mind you. That one works pretty well and is 
actively supported.



It's not my bug, mind. I'm not the OP, so if somebody else wants to
submit a bug, more power to 'em. I've got my own collection of bugs
about which to worry. :)


Fair enough. I's jis' sayin'...

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-04 Thread Ray_Net

Daniel wrote, On 04/08/2013 12:14:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2013 13:23:

Ray_Net wrote:

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:
I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that 
when I

cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting 
standard

text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what 
causes

this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is
not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If
it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your 
text

into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround
for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the
majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We
can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. 
Seamonkey

should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken,
compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the 
this

website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group
the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking
responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data 
from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that 
someone

suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey 
that

seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it
is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.
Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the 
best.
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to 
read

it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft 
developpers

will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.


Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other
mail clients.

So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera,
etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must*
blame SM  *NOT*


So what ? Will his problem be corrected ?


SM is not breaking this situation, SM is not making the problem so get 
MS to fix their situation!!


And MS will say .If you use Word-Copy and Outlook-Paste, then 
send the mail, All will be ok, It's SM that kills the Clipboard data.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-04 Thread Ed Mullen

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 04/08/2013 12:14:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2013 13:23:

Ray_Net wrote:

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that
when I
cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting
standard
text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what
causes
this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is
not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If
it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your
text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround
for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the
majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We
can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use.
Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken,
compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the
this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group
the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking
responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data
from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that
someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey
that
seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it
is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.

Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the
best.
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to
read
it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft
developpers
will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.


Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other
mail clients.

So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera,
etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must*
blame SM  *NOT*


So what ? Will his problem be corrected ?


SM is not breaking this situation, SM is not making the problem so get
MS to fix their situation!!


And MS will say .If you use Word-Copy and Outlook-Paste, then
send the mail, All will be ok, It's SM that kills the Clipboard data.


If you look at it from MS's perspective, as Word as a do-all text 
processor for documents, text, and HTML, then it makes some sense.  Not 
a lot, but /some/.


Assuming (as Word does) that you /might/ be composing an HTML doc, when 
you highlight, hit Copy, Word assumes you want to also copy all the 
underlying code along with the text.  Okay, in our discussion here, we 
do NOT want ANY of the underlying code.  Still, for users who don't know 
any better and who use Word to make HTML files this makes some sense.


Of course, in the real world (people who actually know what the hell 
they're doing) it makes no sense at all.


I'm not certain of the underlying code and functions in SeaMonkey but I 
suspect that SM is doing what it probably should:  Pasting what's on the 
Windows clipboard (put there by Word) ... INCLUDING all the crap that MS 
Word includes.


The not-so-elegant answer is to do what's been suggested up-thread: 
Copy from Word, paste into a plain-text editor (Notepad etc.), 
highlight, copy, then paste into SM.


Arguing about who's right or wrong doesn't solve the issue.  This does.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Why do people point to their wrist when asking for the time, but not to 
their crotch when they ask where the toilet is?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-03 Thread Ralph Fox

On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:14:08 -0400, hawker wrote:


I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it?


In your copy of MS Word, go to File  Save as and check whether the 
Save as type drop-down has an option Web page, Filtered.


Screen-shot:  http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/6291/jgbc.png

If it does, then here is something you can do:
 1.  Save the MS Word document as a .htm file using
 Web page, Filtered and not Web page.
 2.  Open the saved .htm file in SM and copy from there.


--
Kind regards
Ralph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-03 Thread Daniel

Ray_Net wrote:

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I
cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard
text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes
this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is
not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If
it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey that
seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it
is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.

Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the best.
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to read
it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft developpers
will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.


Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other 
mail clients.


So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera, 
etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must* 
blame SM  *NOT*


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18 Build identifier: 20130418192405


or

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.20 Build identifier: 20130709211044

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-03 Thread Ray_Net

Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2013 13:23:

Ray_Net wrote:

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I
cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard
text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes
this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is
not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If
it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround 
for

this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the 
majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We 
can't

pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, 
compliant or

not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group 
the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking 
responsibility -

OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey that
seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it
is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.

Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the best.
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to read
it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft developpers
will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.


Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other 
mail clients.


So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera, 
etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must* 
blame SM  *NOT*



So what ? Will his problem be corrected ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-03 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ray_Net wrote:

 Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2013 13:23:
 Ray_Net wrote:
[biggasnip]
 Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the
 best.
 (if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to
 read it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
 Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft
 developpers will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard
 data.

 Did you notice, above, the OP wrote  It looks fine for all other
 mail clients.

 So it works for MS Word to SM to Chrome, for MS Word to SM to Opera,
 etc, but doesn't work for MS Word to SM to MS Outlook... so we *must*
 blame SM  *NOT*

 So what ? Will his problem be corrected ?

How good are you at getting MS Outlook to correct bugs?

-- 
   -bts
   -developer has but one p
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread hawker
I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and 
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with 
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.


It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or 
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an 
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks 
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread BIll Spikowski
hawker wrote:
 I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and 
 paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with 
 MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.
 
 It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or 
 if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an 
 answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks 
 fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?




Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in 
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look 
correct in Outlook.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?




Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in 
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look 
correct in Outlook.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread BIll Spikowski
hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:
 hawker wrote:
 I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
 paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
 MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

 It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
 if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
 answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
 fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

 In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

 Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
 into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?


 
 Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
 Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in 
 Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look 
 correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
this problem?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?




Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.



Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
this problem?




Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the majority 
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We can't 
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey 
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, compliant or 
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this 
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group the 
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking responsibility - 
OP But it works fine in everything else

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread BIll Spikowski
hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:
 hawker wrote:
 On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:
 hawker wrote:
 I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
 paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
 MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

 It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
 if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
 answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
 fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.
 In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

 Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
 into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?


 Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
 Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
 Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
 correct in Outlook.

 Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
 this problem?


 Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
 I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the majority 
 of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We can't 
 pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey 
 should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, compliant or 
 not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this 
 website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group the 
 website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking responsibility - 
 OP But it works fine in everything else

I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread hawker

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from an 
MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky 
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went from 
Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey that seems 
to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it is a 
Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Ray_Net

hawker wrote, On 02/08/2013 21:07:

On 8/2/2013 3:03 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 2:39 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:

On 8/2/2013 1:44 PM, BIll Spikowski wrote:

hawker wrote:
I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I 
cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or 
gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard 
text.


It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes 
this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is 
not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If 
it looks

fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

In Word, you're NEVER cutting and pasting just standard text!

Have you tried stripping out the MSjunk by first pasting your text
into Wordpad or Notepad, then copying it again from there?



Yep that fixes it but then I loose all formatting.
Interesting that when I copy/past into Seamonkey it looks fine in
Seamonkey, G-Mail, My Android phone, and others but does not look
correct in Outlook.


Perhaps an Outlook support group could provide a solid workaround for
this problem?



Are we going to play the pass the blame game now?
I don't have outlook, I don't use outlook, but I recognize the majority
of the business world does - right or wrong it is the reality. We can't
pawn this off as outlook is broken it is what folks use. Seamonkey
should play nicely with it, weather we think it is broken, compliant or
not. It is similar to the way folks get their hackles up on the this
website looks fine in everything but Mozilla X - Mozilla X group the
website is broken tell them to fix it, I'm not taking responsibility -
OP But it works fine in everything else


I don't understand your rant. You have a problem converting data from
one MS product to another MS product -- and you're upset that someone
suggests you consult MS experts for assistance?



No I have a problem that the way Seamonkey takes clipboard data from 
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that Seamonky 
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went 
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is Seamonkey that 
seems to mangle it.  This is a Seamonkey issue not MS. My guess is it 
is a Clipboard parsing problem in Seamonkey.
Don't expect a solution in SM - the developper think they are the best. 
(if they follow the W3C rules, every other program will be able to read 
it correctly, or perhaps a rule is broken :-) )
Don't expecte a solution in word nor in outlook - microsoft developpers 
will say that passing thru SM have killed the clipboard data.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

hawker wrote:


No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.


Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all 
the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For 
example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an 
HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:


meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
  charset=ISO-8859-1
p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
  mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
  behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
  in which it
  is placed.o:p/o:p/p
followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters 
(including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!


The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly 
quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 02/08/2013 18:28, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
 hawker wrote:
 
 No I have a problem that the way SeaMonkey takes clipboard data from
 an MS product does not work with all e-mail clients and that SeaMonkey
 WYSIWYG is not working correctly under the hood. I'm sure if I went
 from Word to Outlook directly it would work fine. It is SeaMonkey
 that seems to mangle it. This is a SeaMonkey issue not MS. My guess
 is it is a Clipboard parsing problem in SeaMonkey.
 
 Probably not. SeaMonkey is probably being too obedient and capturing all 
 the garbage codes Word supplies instead of stripping them out. For 
 example, I tried pasting one sentence from a Word 2010 document into an 
 HTML composition window in SeaMonkey, and I got this:
 
 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1
  p class=MsoBodyTextThe body always operates as an integrated
mechanism, and #8220;forms#8221;
behavioral or motor acts in strict compliance with the conditions
in which it
is placed.o:p/o:p/p
 followed by 423 more lines of code containing 20,044 characters 
 (including spaces). Yes, that's 20 thousand characters, not 20!
 
 The sentence itself was well-formed; the only change was that the curly 
 quotes were rendered as HTML character entities, which is not a problem.
 


I confirm this behavior. I started with a *blank* Word document. I typed
*one* word in it, with default formatting. I copied that word and pasted
it into a new Seamonkey HTML-formatted message. Then I saved the message
and looked at the source code.

Surprise, surprise: that one word turned into 20 kb of garbage. And it's
easy to tell that the garbage originated in Word, because, well, things
like o: elements (nonstandard), classes named Mso-something (created
by Word) and conditional comments (another nonstandard, Microsoft-only
technology)

What I think is happening...

1. Word places a lot of proprietary garbage on the clipboard yet tags it
as HTML
2. Thunderbird/Seamonkey believes the tag and accepts the paste as is.
3. It probably tweaks the content a little in order to mesh with the
rest of the HTML-formatted message.
4. Most non-MS mail clients ignore the proprietary garbage and render
the message the same as the Seamonkey-user sender intended.
5. Outlook, however, attempts to interpret those remains of the
proprietary garbage and fails horribly

The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my VAX.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.17 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Iceman
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:14:08 -0400, hawker wrote in message
news:sn2dnyqt-sb9dwbmnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org:

 I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and 
 paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with 
 MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.
 
 It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or 
 if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an 
 answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks 
 fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.

How about just mailing the Word document as an attachment? You can put it
in a zipfile first, to reduce size.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Lemuel Johnson

MCBastos wrote:


The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.



Until that happens the OP can obtain PureText:
http://stevemiller.net/puretext/

Set it to run on startup.  Thereafter any text pasted from the clipboard 
(using its hotkey WINDOWS+V)is stripped of everything except 
new-lines/carriage returns/tabs/other white-space.


LJ
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Ed Mullen

Iceman wrote:

On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:14:08 -0400, hawker wrote in message
news:sn2dnyqt-sb9dwbmnz2dnuvz_qsdn...@mozilla.org:


I keep getting complaints from those who use Outlook that when I cut and
paste from MS Word all they get is Greek letters and/or gibberish with
MS font inserts and such.  I'm only cutting and pasting standard text.

It looks fine for all other mail clients.  Any ideas what causes this or
if there is something I can do about it? Dumping on Outlook is not an
answer. Folks are going to use it, no matter what we think. If it looks
fine in SM it should look fine in Outlook.


How about just mailing the Word document as an attachment? You can put it
in a zipfile first, to reduce size.



Not everyone has Word, or the ability to decipher its gibberish of code. 
If all you're trying to do is send text, don't use Word.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
OK:  Moths and sweaters.  I just don't get the attraction.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Cut and Past from Word to Seamonkey is gibberish for Outlook users

2013-08-02 Thread Ed Mullen

Lemuel Johnson wrote:

MCBastos wrote:


The only way I see for fixing it from the Mozilla end would be to add
code for detecting MS proprietary garbage in the clipboard and run it
through a sanitizer (something like HTMLtidy with the -word2000 option)
to clean it up.



Until that happens the OP can obtain PureText:
http://stevemiller.net/puretext/

Set it to run on startup.  Thereafter any text pasted from the clipboard
(using its hotkey WINDOWS+V)is stripped of everything except
new-lines/carriage returns/tabs/other white-space.

LJ


Or, as suggested by someone else here, copy in Word, paste it into 
Notepad or some other plain-text editor, re-select it, copy, then paste 
it into Mozilla's editor.  Nothing but text is the result.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
OK:  Moths and sweaters.  I just don't get the attraction.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey