t-and-f: WAVA elections uncontested in 2001

2001-04-04 Thread TrackCEO

Greetings, all

I've learned that only one elective office will be contested at the Brisbane 
General Assembly -- the biennial meeting of voting delegates during the World 
Veterans Athletic Championships in July. So far, the only race is for vice 
president (stadia) between incumbent Jim Blair of New Zealand and WAVA Web 
site webmaster Rex Harvey of the United States. (Rex also holds a regional 
WAVA post, some committee assignments as well as positions in USATF Masters.) 
 

This means that WAVA President Torsten Carlius, Executive Vice-President Tom 
Jordan, General Secretary Monty Hacker, Vice President (Non-Stadia) Ron Bell, 
Treasurer Giuseppe Galfetti and women's representative Bridget Cushen are 
going unopposed in an organization nominally devoted to robust competition.

This must mean that everything's hunky-dory in Mastersland.  Or maybe not.  
Perhaps word hasn't circulated far enough that WAVA's election will be more 
of a coronation. But time is short for any would-be candidates.

Under WAVA rules, nominations for Council candidates have to be in the hands 
of the WAVA secretary at least 90 days before the General Assembly, which 
this year appears to be July 11, 2001 -- a rest day in the WAVA meet program. 
(Nominations from the floor are technically possible, but they appear to be 
at the discretion of the presiding officer.)

This means that the deadline for anyone wanting to run for WAVA office at 
Brisbane is April 14 -- about 10 days from now. Elections are held every four 
years, and no officer can hold the same office for more than two terms. Any 
affiliate of WAVA can submit a nomination for office. (An affiliate is a 
national governing body -- USATF in the case of America.)

WAVA shouldn't be an IAAF-like oligarchy, but without some competitive races, 
it appears the Old Boys Club continues to rule WAVAland.

I'm not saying any of the current crop of officers has done a poor job 
(although I have my doubts on certain issues), but the legitimacy of an 
organization is proportional to its willingness to foster debate and 
encourage new blood.

Right now, I see little of this in WAVA.

Also, FYI:

WAVA webmaster Harvey has just posted the minutes of the September 2000 
meeting of the WAVA Stadia Committee -- the group in charge of the nuts and 
bolts of the world vets meet in Brisbane.  These minutes are posted at:

http://www.wava.org/committees/stadia%20committee/00stadia%20committee%20minut

es.htm

And they are QUITE revealing.  Sprinters,  jumpers and throwers all have 
something to chew on.  Please review these minutes and keep yourself informed 
on what WAVA is doing for and to masters athletes.  It's the governing body 
of OUR sport. Might as well know what it's up to.

Ken Stone
http://www.masterstrack.com



Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread WMurphy25


In a message dated 4/4/01 12:03:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 There have been dozens or even

hundreds of kids over the years who were capable of breaking 9:00, but few

of them run it."

Uh, I don't think so.


So, like the marathon, and possibly even the 10K, it will never be broken

unless a top runner chooses to it.  How many sub 8:50 2-milers have tried

the 3000SC in the past 10 years?

I don't know if any of them tried the steeplechase, but there have only been 
ten sub-8:50 prep 2-milers since 1980!

Walt Murphy




Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Maybe ... Must remember that the 2 most prolific teams ever were the Roy 
Martin teams of Texas and the Thomas anchored Hawthorne teams ... Both of 
these kids ran sub 45 anchors in high school ... Hawthorne's "average" is 
under 47 ... Hawthorne also had Mike Marsh who was state 200 champion in 
Thomas' absence (hernia surgery at the last minute) in 20.80 ... as well as 
a 36.xx 300 hurdler ... It was really the equivalent of an all star team ... 
The likes of which may never be seen again at a single school ... Now a 
Texas or California all star team could certainly give it a push ... But 
will be very hard for a "regular" high school to do ...

Conway




 4 x 400 - 3:07.40 - Hawthorne 1986 

Conway,

I think this one can go down if some of the Texas and Cali teams geared
toward it. Obea Moore and crew approached it several times but just 
couldn't
get it. I remember them running 3:08-3:09 at Penn with two injured runners.


Larry A. Morgan, Sr.

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




t-and-f: Snowbird Invitational, March 17?

2001-04-04 Thread Winfried Kramer

Can someone please tell me where to find the results of the 
Snowbird Invitational held at the weekend of March 17? Thank you.


Winfried Kramer
Kohlrodweg 12
66539  Neunkirchen/Germany

Association of Track  Field Statisticians
Editor of NATIONAL ATHLETICS RECORDS
www.saar.de/~kramer



Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Ed wrote:



To me, the shot put and the 10,000 are the two records that are most out of 
reach on that list, with the mile and the 4 x 400 next.  I think there's 
every chance that we'll see the 2 mile and 5K fall in the next 5 years, 
while the 400m is the type of event where I can see some stud coming along 
and scaring the record.

As for the marathon, there have definitely been high schoolers capable of 
the record, it's just a question of whether it will ever be run by someone 
of that caliber again.  Certainly Ryan Hall's sub 50:00 10-miler is 
indicative of the ability to run 2:23.

Out of curiosity, what do 2nd and third places on the all-time 10K and shot 
put list look like?


On the 10,000 list 2  3 are also from 76 and #4 is Lindgren

#2 28:55.0 - Eric Hulst
#3 29:06.8 - Bill McChessney
#4 29:17.6 - Lindgren

As for the shot put #2 is 76'2" by Brent Noon from 1990 ... I was fortunate 
enough to be at the Golden West when Carter set that record .. When he let 
the ball fly it went past every flag laid out (meet record, national record, 
etc) and just looked like it would sail forever ... Was one of the most 
awesome sights I have seen in track AND field ...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill


GM wrote:

insignificant as this discussion must seem to our non-U.S. listers, it does
raise some interesting discussion!

some other HS marks that may be tough to beat:

--Roy Martin's 20.13 for 200m; the closest someone has gotten in the 16 
years
since it was set? 20.46 in 1990 by Henry Neal.


I thought about putting Martin's 20.13 on the list ... But a Texas kid, 
Brendan Christian, set the indoor record this year at 21.02 and is only a 
junior ... He ran 20.78 last year as a soph .. So I would say barring 
injuries he would have a chance to break it in the next two seasons (this 
one and next) ...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread Mcewen, Brian T

 Brad Hudson used to do Sunday runs almost that fast. 

malmo  

Yeah ... add to it that Pfeffer has the AJR at 2:17:44 (I think), and all
you need is a HS'er who trains seriously for the 5k/10k and tries one of the
faster marathons in the Fall after XC is over, or Grandma's after State meet
is over or something.   All due respect to Clancy Devery, but consider what
guys from the same HS era could have done in the marathon ... guys like
Salazar, Chapa, and Chris Fox ... or Bill McChesney, who went 29:27 as a
10th grader.  

What they COULD have done is irrelevant ... but it is clear that there are
(and will be) runners that could go sub-2:23.  international women run
30:30-31:00 frequently in the 10k, then run 2:21-25 for 26.2.

Think there are some 30:30 HS 10k runners?

And regarding the other "fairly unapproachable" records:



* 10,000 - 28.32.7 - Rudy Chapa 1976- Good for another 25 years!

* 5,000 - 13.44.0 - Gerry Lindgren 1964

- Chance to go THIS YEAR, but nobody has been within ten seconds in
20 years, it could last another 25 years as well.

* 2 Miles - 8:36.3 - Jeff Nelson 1979   - broken THIS year.

* Mile 3:55.3 - Jim Ryun 1965   

- NOT broken for another 35 years, there is a reason he has the
FIVE-fastest marks ever.

-Brian


-Original Message-
From: malmo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:33 PM
To: Tom Jimenez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Records


Brad Hudson used to do Sunday runs almost that fast. 

malmo

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Jimenez
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:27 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: t-and-f: Records
 
 
 Marathon Jr. record: Gompers - 2:15:28 / Dec 83
 
 Prep record that will last:
 
 Marathon; Clancy Devery (S Salem HS) - 2:23:05 / 1977
 
 T Jimenez
 Salem, OR.
 
 BTW- I played baskteball with Clancy in 1978 and while he could
 get to every rebound tirelessly, he wasn't a very good shot. But
 a great guy.
 
 
 



RE: t-and-f: Record duration

2001-04-04 Thread Mcewen, Brian T

I remember the belief that Clayton's time may not be a true 2:08 ... it
persisted right up until Salazar ran 2:08:13. 

But, didn't Clayton own the CR at Fukuoka with a 2:09:36 or 2:09:46 or in
the mid-2:09's?  I believe he set it in 1969 and the course was the same one
that was used in the years before and after 1969.

That would have qualified for the WR for a few years anyway (without the
doubtful 2:08:37). I think it would have been the WR until Ian Thompson's
2:09:12.  This is from memory though, not a world list or record
progression.

Re: the training of Clayton.  Ed parrot is right.  It was my understanding
that Clayton ran 25 miles in about 2:18, close to a 2:25 marathon, almost
every week of the year.  Even faster than that some weeks.

-Brian

-Original Message-
From: Ed  Dana Parrot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:31 PM
To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Record duration


gh wrote:

 I don't know how modern marathon statisticians view Clayton's time, but
there was certainly no end of skepticism about course length for many years
after we ran it, and there's no doubt that course-measuring techniques and
requirements weren't remotely as effective then as now.

 Given that a couple of decades worth of studs the caliber of Shorter and
Cierpinski couldn't take the mark down would add some credence to the
claims of the naysayers, although it may well be that the Antwerp course
(anybody know it?) was just the precursor of the modern flat speedways that
make sub-2:10s so easy, while Shorter  Co. were putting out their best
efforts on more difficult routes.

You may be right.  However, my understanding is that few in the 1960's and
even into the 1970's did mileage at the kind of pace that Clayton did (if
his book is to be believed).  Certainly Shorter, Rodgers, etc were not
running easy, but I don't think they were running 100 of their 140+ miles at
5:10 pace or faster.

- ed Parrot




t-and-f: the oldest HS record... and the softest?

2001-04-04 Thread Post, Marty

Paradoxically it seems the oldest HS record might be one of the softest.

Last winter Webb ran 2:23.68 indoor HSR for 1000 meters.

The outdoor version is almost 2 seconds slower, 2:25.55. It might have
something to do with when it was run: Aug 10... 1957! (Wonder if Webb's
father had been born when that record was set.)



Marty Post
Senior Editor
Runner's World Magazine
www.runnersworld.com




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Usatfnews

Justin:

I believe Derrick Florence is the name you are looking for (10.13 100m)

Does bring back some memories, indeed. In particular, of the magical nights 
at the Texas State Meet in 1985 with Roy Martin, Joe Deloach and Stanley Kerr 
cranking out some of the best prep deuces in history... in different 
divisions! Anyone else there that night who is willing to share their recall?

By the way... the only non-Texan to crack that group on the '85 national list 
is also the only one still active as an elite athlete... name, anyone?



RE: t-and-f: Record duration

2001-04-04 Thread Post, Marty

Clayton ran 2:09:36.4 at Fukuoka in Dec. '67 (back in those days, timing
folks followed long-standing track protocols which recorded times in
even-tenths of a second.)

His 2:08:33.6 at Antwerp was on  May 30, 1969.

The first non-Antwerp time better than the Fukuoka mark was Ron Hill's
2:09:29 at the 1970 Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh. Thompson's 2:09:12 was
at the '74 Commonwealth Games in Christchurch.

-Original Message-
From: Mcewen, Brian T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:03 AM
To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Record duration


I remember the belief that Clayton's time may not be a true 2:08 ... it
persisted right up until Salazar ran 2:08:13. 

But, didn't Clayton own the CR at Fukuoka with a 2:09:36 or 2:09:46 or in
the mid-2:09's?  I believe he set it in 1969 and the course was the same one
that was used in the years before and after 1969.

That would have qualified for the WR for a few years anyway (without the
doubtful 2:08:37). I think it would have been the WR until Ian Thompson's
2:09:12.  This is from memory though, not a world list or record
progression.

Re: the training of Clayton.  Ed parrot is right.  It was my understanding
that Clayton ran 25 miles in about 2:18, close to a 2:25 marathon, almost
every week of the year.  Even faster than that some weeks.

-Brian

-Original Message-
From: Ed  Dana Parrot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:31 PM
To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Record duration


gh wrote:

 I don't know how modern marathon statisticians view Clayton's time, but
there was certainly no end of skepticism about course length for many years
after we ran it, and there's no doubt that course-measuring techniques and
requirements weren't remotely as effective then as now.

 Given that a couple of decades worth of studs the caliber of Shorter and
Cierpinski couldn't take the mark down would add some credence to the
claims of the naysayers, although it may well be that the Antwerp course
(anybody know it?) was just the precursor of the modern flat speedways that
make sub-2:10s so easy, while Shorter  Co. were putting out their best
efforts on more difficult routes.

You may be right.  However, my understanding is that few in the 1960's and
even into the 1970's did mileage at the kind of pace that Clayton did (if
his book is to be believed).  Certainly Shorter, Rodgers, etc were not
running easy, but I don't think they were running 100 of their 140+ miles at
5:10 pace or faster.

- ed Parrot




Re: t-and-f: Sanchez - New US Junior 5000 record?

2001-04-04 Thread mmrohl

Netters

I just realized that I wrote that Sanchez and Ritz had a chance at 
Chapa's H.S. 10k record.  And of course Sanchez is already out of H.S..  I 
was thinking Junior Record.  Ritz, I would think, has a shot still.  Sorry 
for my error.



t-and-f: Track Coach Magazine

2001-04-04 Thread McDonald, Craig Richard

Track Coach (formerly Track Technique) is the official technical (some
articles) quarterly of USA Track and Field and has been the sport's major
publication since 1960.  It was founded by Fred Wilt in an effort to make
technical and practical information available to American coaches.  Wilf
Paish, from the United Kingdom, an International Athletics Consultant,
considers Track Coach "...the only publication of its kind which seems to
achieve the right balance of articles directed at skill and training methods
together with regular research items and those written by 'armchair'
coaches."   Currently edited by Russ Ebbets, who is trying to include a wide
variety of articles with appeal to many levels, this quarters publication
includes the following:

Athlete Profile:  The Emergence of Ryan Hall by Irv Ray, California Baptist
University.  An article on the development of an excellent high school
runner.

High Jump:  Technical Aspects by Steve Patrick, Track and Field Coach, SUNY
Cobleskill.  Editor's note:  A clear, easy-to-follow discussion of the
approach, takeoff, and bar clearance, the three basic components of the HJ.

Quis Custodiat Ipsos Custodes?  (Who educates the educators?) by Wilf Paish.
Editors note:  If you thought that Coaching Education in Britain is a model
for the world, here is a dissenting opinion from an observer who likes to
shake things up a bit.  Non-British readers will find his remarks, which
bear in large degree upon the coach's management of time, apply to most
coaching situations.

Muscle Fiber Types and Training by Jason R. Karp, MS.  Editor's note:  The
author describes the three types of muscle fiber and discusses their
implications for the training of athletes.

An interview with Ruth Wysocki by the editor, Russ Ebbets.  The editor asks
one of America's outstanding middle distance runners for her perspectives on
her own development, mistakes, role models, philosophy, difficulties for
women athletes, how to improve our national effort, goals and progression,
tips for traveling and competing in Europe, peaking patterns and others.

You Need a Needs Analysis by John Cissick.  Editor's note:  "Needs Analysis"
refers to the work that is done before writing out an athlete's annual plan.
This is the period of time when a coach systematically decides what the
athlete need to develop and prioritizes those qualities for the upcoming
plan.  This article will describe how to examine an event's needs and then
how to figure out how the athlete measures up to those needs.

A Psychological Application for Distance Runners, by Scott Christensen,
Stillwater (MN) Senior High School.  Editor's note:  (The author) describes
the DALDA, a stress awareness test he administered during distance champion
Luke Watson's senior year.  ...it can be a very useful tool for both the
coach and athlete in assessing an athlete's mental and physical state at any
given time, indicating which areas of stress require immediate attention.

World Roundup, by Jess Jarver.  Digests of articles from around the world.
The digests this month include:
Strength Development in endurance athletes.  (Estonia)
Riddles of the 100m Sprint (Russia)
Are Sports Drinks Worth the Money?  (Australia)
Periodization of Technique Training.  (in the Thrower, Great Britain)
And six more

Information on when and where to attend USATF Level II Coaches Schools.

You can subscribe by writing Track and Field News, 2570 El Camino Real,
Suite 606, Mountain View, CA 94040 USA.  (650) 948-8188.  FAX (650)
948-9445.  www.trackandfieldnews.com http://www.trackandfieldnews.com 
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm not associated with USATF or Track and Field News, but hope that this
information will put some new and developing coaches and athletes in touch
with another source of information.  Also I'm sure many of you as coaches
could share useful information about your athletes and track and field
programs that would be useful to other coaches.  Such articles can be
submitted to the above address.  One of Fred Wilt's best liked sections was
a "How They Train".  Share how one of your outstanding athletes trained for
an event.  Sharing this type of information will make everyone's program
stronger and strengthen our national program in the long term.

Craig
 



t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread GHTFNedit

Dwight Perry of the Seattle Times wrote, "When Cal State Fullerton kicked Leilani Rios 
off the Titan track club for dancing in a strip joint, it supplied a whole new meaning 
for the hackneyed term 'thinclad.' "

gh

ps--does anybody but a an over-40 sportswriter actually use the term "thinclad" 
anymore?



RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread DLTFNedit

In a message dated Wed, 4 Apr 2001  9:57:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Mcewen, Brian 
T" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Yeah ... add to it that Pfeffer has the AJR at 2:17:44 (I think), and all
you need is a HS'er who trains seriously for the 5k/10k and tries one of the
faster marathons in the Fall after XC is over, or Grandma's after State meet
is over or something. 
-Brian


NO!!! This is precisely what is wrong with American marathoning! You can't just train 
for the 5K/10K, add a few long runs, and then run a good marathon. You have to train 
specifically for the 42.195K. You can have a period where you do 5K/10K training and 
racing, but you need a good 3 months of marathon-specific work.
sideshow



Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Does anyone out there have the 85 sprint lists handy ??


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:29:39 EDT

Justin:

I believe Derrick Florence is the name you are looking for (10.13 100m)

Does bring back some memories, indeed. In particular, of the magical nights
at the Texas State Meet in 1985 with Roy Martin, Joe Deloach and Stanley 
Kerr
cranking out some of the best prep deuces in history... in different
divisions! Anyone else there that night who is willing to share their 
recall?

By the way... the only non-Texan to crack that group on the '85 national 
list
is also the only one still active as an elite athlete... name, anyone?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




t-and-f: Carl as tough guy

2001-04-04 Thread GHTFNedit

Carl Lewis's website (www.carllewis.com) has some interesting clips of him as an 
actor. Check this puppy out, which requires quicktime (and an acceptance of naughty 
language)

http://www.carllewis.com/video.acting.1.html



Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Ed Dana Parrot

Walt Murphy wrote:

there have only been  ten sub-8:50 prep 2-milers since 1980!

I actually thought there were more, so thanks for pointing that out.

My point was simply that any of them might have broken the Steeplechase
record if they ran it a few times.  Steeple times and 2 mile times are
roughly equivalent at the world level - actually Steeple times may even be
ever so slightly faster, although it's hard to tell because the 2-mile is
not run very often at that level.


- Ed Parrot




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

I would have to guess Mike Marsh ... Although at 20.80 he was a little off 
the pace of the others ... Imagine .. 20.80 and off the pace  Now THAT 
was a list ...

Conway


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:29:39 EDT

Justin:

I believe Derrick Florence is the name you are looking for (10.13 100m)

Does bring back some memories, indeed. In particular, of the magical nights
at the Texas State Meet in 1985 with Roy Martin, Joe Deloach and Stanley 
Kerr
cranking out some of the best prep deuces in history... in different
divisions! Anyone else there that night who is willing to share their 
recall?

By the way... the only non-Texan to crack that group on the '85 national 
list
is also the only one still active as an elite athlete... name, anyone?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
Actually, Michael Graham ran sub 36 behind George Porter.
I tend to agree with Conway. It will take another special collection of 
HSers to break that 4x400 record. Yes, a few have come close, but there is a 
reason they have not broken it. I that record breaking race Henry and Roy 
split sub 45, and that was a HS race. That Hawthorne team was a special one, 
you had Mike Marsh out of the hole, you had a sub 1:49 half miler who could 
run 47 out of the blocks, you had the second best 300IH at the time, who ran 
under 36, and you had arguably, the greatest all around HS sprinter in Henry 
Thomas. 
I believe there will always be teams hat look as though they have s hot, and 
will run close to the record, but the team that breaks that record will be 
another collection of special kids.

DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
This discussion has brought up an interesting question. Why has the 10k been 
run so infrequently over the years? It seems as though in the 70's it was 
run at a regular rate, but now it is almost none existent.

Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: koch wr

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Steve wrote:

However,to see this World record was awesome. I think the only person who 
could
have a chance of challenging the womens 400 record would be Marion Jones 
and
she may have to run it in a similar way ...really hit it hard early and use
her huge strength to maintain form in the straight.


I have a question .. Prior to Irena Szewinska women ran the 400 like a non 
sprint - more paced .. Irena brought the 400 to the land of the sprinter .. 
The E. Germans followed (Brehmer, Koch, Wockel, and others) ... And through 
the 80s and early 90s there was some true "speed" in the event (primarily 
Perec with some forays by Torrence and Privalova) ...

Why is it that sprinters left the event ??? I mean Freeman has ok speed but 
nothing on the level of the others ... Breuer sprinted early in her career 
but has not since her return from suspension (and frankly I think is why she 
isn't the dominant Q-miler she should be) .. And even using Breuer as an 
example .. She runs so much better in the relays .. Primarily becasue she is 
behind and has to "sprint" during the first part of the race...

Have female quartermilers abandonded the "sprint" philosphy of the quarter 
??? And if so why ??? It is definitely a race in stagnation ... And I would 
not put it all on "drugs" as there definitely seems to be a chaneg in the 
race strategy itself - for the worse ..

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread ShepWest


In a message dated 4/4/01 8:24:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I would have to guess Mike Marsh ... Although at 20.80 he was a little off 
the pace of the others ... Imagine .. 20.80 and off the pace  Now THAT 
was a list ... 

Here is the '85 list of "legal" HS 200 runners.  Remember some of these names?

20.13   Roy Martin (Roosevelt, Dallas, Tx)
20.24   Joe DeLoach (Bay City, Tx)
20.61   Floyd Heard (Marshall, Milwaukee, Wi) 
20.4Stanley Kerr (Snook, Tx) 6/19/67
Henry Thomas (Hawthorne, Ca) (+20.69)
20.76   Michael Timpson (Miami Lakes, Hialeah, Fl)
20.82   Michael Marsh (Hawthorne, Ca) 
20.97   Danny Everett (Fairfax, Los Angeles, Ca)


Jack Shepard



Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
Speaking of great HS 200's, anyone recall the 1988 CalHi version? I know I 
do, although I think the LA City Championship that year was more stunning. 
But to see Quincy and Brian Bridgewater battle down that home stretch was 
astounding. Has there ever been a fast 1-2? I know there have been faster 
1's, and maybe 2's in separate races, but I believe the times these 2 posted 
were amazing for a HS meet. If memory serves me correctly they ran 20.55 and 
20.60 respectively in that race, correct me if I am wrong someone.
Also, that probably marked the biggest mistake in Quincy's HS career. He 
should have run the 400 in that meet because he was coming off of a hamstring 
injury. He had just set the City record of 46.66, but chose the 200 at State.

DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: koch wr

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
From what I have observed over the years the stagnation has been rooted in 
the misconception hat women cannot handle the race. Coupled with the 
unwillingness of the current crop of sprinters to accept the challenge of the 
race.
I see the talent out there, but they are running the 100 and 200. And there 
are a few men that fit that description also. If you are a woman that runs 
11.2 and 22.5, you should be running the 400. If you are a man that can run 
10.1 - 10.2, and 20.2 - 20.3, you should be running the 400.

DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Dan Kaplan

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has there ever been a fast[er?] 1-2?  I know there have been faster 
 1's, and maybe 2's in separate races,

Do you mean a closer 1-2 at a fast time?  If there have been faster 2's,
then I should think the corresponding 1 was also faster, making the 1-2
faster...

Dan

=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...

  @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text



Re: t-and-f: koch wr

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Darrell wrote:



From what I have observed over the years the stagnation has been rooted in
the misconception hat women cannot handle the race.  Coupled with the
unwillingness of the current crop of sprinters to accept the challenge of 
the
race.
I see the talent out there, but they are running the 100 and 200.  And 
there
are a few men that fit that description also.  If you are a woman that runs
11.2 and 22.5, you should be running the 400.  If you are a man that can 
run
10.1 - 10.2, and 20.2 - 20.3, you should be running the 400.


I would agree with that assessment ... Men and women ... On the women's side 
I think we've gotten away from the days when Merlene Ottey was running the 
400 (in addition to the short sprints)Eveleyn Ashford ran some 400s .. FloJO 
when she was just Florence ... And the eastern bloc sprinters ran all 3 
sprints ... Even here in the States Chandra Cheeseborough and Valerie Brisco 
moved UP to the 400 ... And almost 20 years later are still the top 2 US 
Q-milers ... Pam Marshall in a brief attempt before being struck down by 
injury broke 50 and would have surely been great at the distance ..

It has been shown that times around 11.00 and 22.00 make for the best 
Q-milers .. Am surprised that some sprinters would rather never have a shot 
at any kind of medal in teh 100 or 200 than move up a notch and have a true 
chance ...

Same on the men' side ... The 2 best of the last decade, Watts and Johnson 
were both sprinters with good 100 speed but injury prone who made the long 
sprint(s) look like cake walks ... A guy like Obikwelu for example who may 
never have a true shot at 100 glory due to his late get a way .. Coould be 
awesome at the 200/400 double ... I know it hurts some ... But not enough to 
forgo the opportunity that presents itself to some of these athletes ... Or 
maybe I am wrong ...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Jack wrote:


Here is the '85 list of "legal" HS 200 runners.  Remember some of these 
names?

20.13   Roy Martin (Roosevelt, Dallas, Tx)
20.24   Joe DeLoach (Bay City, Tx)
20.61   Floyd Heard (Marshall, Milwaukee, Wi)
20.4Stanley Kerr (Snook, Tx) 6/19/67
 Henry Thomas (Hawthorne, Ca) (+20.69)
20.76   Michael Timpson (Miami Lakes, Hialeah, Fl)
20.82   Michael Marsh (Hawthorne, Ca)
20.97   Danny Everett (Fairfax, Los Angeles, Ca)



Talk about a class:

Martin - 1988 Olympic team

Deloach - 1988 Olympic gold medallist - 19.75 beating none other than Carl 
Lewis

Heard - a #1 world ranker, NCAA champion and made the 2000 Olympic team in 
the event -- and there is the answer to the previous trivia question !

Thomas - an NCAA champion

Marsh - 1992 Olympic champion - 20.01 (19.73 semi)

Everrett - 1988 Olympic Bronze medallist at 400 - 44.09 with 43.81pr

Has any class in any event ever been as successful ??? NCAA champions, 
Olympic champions and medallists .. And as of last year Heard and Marsh were 
still going strong at or under the 20.00 level ...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Darrell wrote:

This discussion has brought up an interesting question.  Why has the 10k 
been
run so infrequently over the years?  It seems as though in the 70's it was
run at a regular rate, but now it is almost none existent.


Good question .. Maybe it is my lack of knowlege on distance running, but I 
don't see many races outside of the 2 mile, 3200 meter range ... I was in 
high school in the 70s so maybe it more in my consciousness, but guys like 
Virgin, Hunt, Hulst, Williams, McChesney seemed to be running a lot more of 
the 5,000 , 10,000 type races ... Is that true or just a figment of my 
imagination ???

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread Richard McCann


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

 
NO!!! This is precisely what is wrong with American marathoning! You can't 
just train for the 5K/10K, add a few long runs, and then run a good 
marathon. You have to train specifically for the 42.195K. You can have a 
period where you do 5K/10K training and racing, but you need a good 3 
months of marathon-specific work.
sideshow

Let's not get too ambitious here.  We're not talking about open athletes, 
but rather HS athletes.  If a HS athlete is training for a 10k, they are 
already upping their mileage well beyond what they would do for their 
regular season training of 2 miles on the track or 5k xc.  It is much more 
important to develop speed at a younger age because you can't reclaim it 
when you're older.  I think the suggested strategy of training a bit longer 
and then stepping up is just right for HS.

As for open athletes, I don't think the problem is so much training for 
shorter distances and then stepping  up as that athletes now train less for 
the shorter distances than they have in the past.  That makes stepping up 
much more difficult than in the past, and in part is probably a source of 
dismal US performances over the last decade plus.

Richard McCann




t-and-f: Re: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread Richard McCann


the runner-up at 10k is 28:55.0 by Eric Hulst in 1976.

Hulst's was second to Chapa, and Bill McChessney was third in about 29:06, 
all at the US Juniors in Knoxville.  They all were involved in a hot race 
the previous year as well in which the winner (who's name escapes me, but 
went to Tennessee and  ran well in the NCAA 10k one year) scared Lindgren's 
record.  Chapa ran in the 76 US Trials, but only around 30:00 in the heats.

Richard McCann




t-and-f: Track accuracy

2001-04-04 Thread Hayward102

There was an article in the Oregonian newspaper today about the track at Willamette 
University in Salem. During some recent work to the track they discovered that each 
lap was actually 406m.  The steeplechase was the only event that was accurately 
measured.  No one is sure when the mistake was made, but it has probably been like 
that for some time.  Just made me wonder how many other tracks like that are around.

Matthew



RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread alan tobin

It is much more
important to develop speed at a younger age because you can't reclaim it
when you're older.

Could someone delete this sentence from existance? Speed before endurance? 
M...dunno bout that one..;) That must be why hoards of Africans are 
running so well. You must develop a sound base of aerobic endurance through 
easy mileage and hard aerobic runs (threshold runs) before you introduce 
speed. Too much hard speedwork, not enough hard aerobic runs, that is part 
of the problem. Not training specifically for the marathon is yet another 
problem. Run a lot, week after week after week.

Alan
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: more on prep records...

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Darrell wrote:


Speaking of great HS 200's, anyone recall the 1988 CalHi version?  I know I
do, although I think the LA City Championship that year was more stunning.
But to see Quincy and Brian Bridgewater battle down that home stretch was
astounding.  Has there ever been a fast 1-2?  I know there have been faster
1's, and maybe 2's in separate races, but I believe the times these 2 
posted
were amazing for a HS meet.  If memory serves me correctly they ran 20.55 
and
20.60 respectively in that race, correct me if I am wrong someone.
Also, that probably marked the biggest mistake in Quincy's HS career.  He
should have run the 400 in that meet because he was coming off of a 
hamstring
injury.  He had just set the City record of 46.66, but chose the 200 at 
State.


That was one of the most classic 200s in CalHi history ... I don't remember 
the times specifically and am not home to look em up ... But sounds really 
close ... And I agree that Quincy should have run the 400 instead ... Oh 
well, he eventually did and the rest is Olympic history ...

As for Cal state meet 200s another that sticks in my mind is the 77 and 
James Sanford stretch run against David Russell from Patrick Henry of SAn 
Diego ... Then the 400 and 200 were back to back and no one was trying that 
as a double .. Sanford was the state leader in both and did attempt the 
double ... He easily won the 400 in 46.60y (46.33 I believe is what it was 
converted to) ... And then with only the womens 200 as a rest came back to 
try the 200 ... Russell had won the 100 earlier and so the race pit the 2 
sprint champs against easch other ... Russell was out fast and ran one H--- 
of a turn .. Coming off the turn quite clear of the field Russell looked to 
be heading for an easy victory .. But Sanford (initially sluggish from the 
400) put on a burst of speed unlike few I have seen in any race (HS, 
colegiate or open) .. Russell was forced to lean at the finish .. Anxiously 
awaiting what seemed like forever (early accutrack days) Russell was the 
winner 20.97y to 21.00y (20.85 to 20.88 converted) if my memory is correct 
.. Not quite as fast as Bridgewater and Watts, but anyone that was in teh 
stadium will attest to the electricty and awe at Sanford's move down the 
stretch ... And that after about a 20 minute rest from an outstanding 400 
...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Track accuracy

2001-04-04 Thread Dan Kaplan

Never trust what you read in the paper.  ;-)

Dan

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There was an article in the Oregonian newspaper today about the track at
 Willamette University in Salem. During some recent work to the track
 they discovered that each lap was actually 406m.  The steeplechase was
 the only event that was accurately measured.  No one is sure when the
 mistake was made, but it has probably been like that for some time. 
 Just made me wonder how many other tracks like that are around.
 
 Matthew


=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...

  @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text



Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Ed Dana Parrot

 Darrell wrote:

 This discussion has brought up an interesting question.  Why has the 10k
 been
 run so infrequently over the years?  It seems as though in the 70's it
was
 run at a regular rate, but now it is almost none existent.
 
Conway wrote:
 Good question .. Maybe it is my lack of knowlege on distance running, but
I
 don't see many races outside of the 2 mile, 3200 meter range ... I was in
 high school in the 70s so maybe it more in my consciousness, but guys like
 Virgin, Hunt, Hulst, Williams, McChesney seemed to be running a lot more
of
 the 5,000 , 10,000 type races ... Is that true or just a figment of my
 imagination ???

It's definitely true that high schoolers rarely run a track 5K/10K anymore
except for the few states where the 5000m is a regular high school event.  I
don't know how prevalent it used ot be, other than it seems that many of the
best distance runners ran a few of them.  How many of those 5K/10K races
back then were high school only races and how many were open?

It certainly seems true that with the lower weekly mileages that many high
schoolers have been running the past 20 years, the 5K/10K might be less
appealing.

- ed Parrot




t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread GHTFNedit

In a message dated Wed, 4 Apr 2001  3:04:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Richard McCann 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hulst's was second to Chapa, and Bill McChessney was third in about 29:06,  all at 
the US Juniors in Knoxville. 

Rich is confusing two races: Chapa set the 10K HSR of 28:32.7 at Drake in '76. At 
Knoxville in '75 Chapa and Hulst both set the previous HSR of 29:11.2.

In retrospect, I think all the 10K marks at Knoxville that year (and who knows how 
many other years) were fraudulent. I only have some skimpy empirical evidence to go 
on, but consider this: Well, first,  you need to understand that the track was 440y, 
not 400m, so they had to run 6M (24 laps) plus 376y. Let's assume the track was indeed 
440y (and in a post several months back I posited that I thought/think that the track 
itself was short as a 440y oval to begin with, but that's another matter).

I don't think they measured the 376y part properly; they came out short.

Based on 6M splits, Chapa and Hulst (a pair of 17-year-olds) ran that last 376y in 
48.4 seconds. On a hot, wet day in Knoxville, do I think they could finish a 10K at 
56.3 pace? NOT!

Let's consider some other evidence. Looking at earlier WR races, back when 6M was 
still an accepted distance, we find that in Ron Clarke's 27:39.4 he finished in 52.4. 
In an unratified 28:14.0 he ran 51.4. When Sandor Iharos WRed at 28:42.8 he needed 
59.0 to finish. Were these 17-year-olds, in tough conditions, that much better than WR 
setters? I think not.

And the next year, when Chapa ran the 28:32, his last 376y took him 56.3.

In a "furious sprint" for 3rd and 4th at the '64 NCAA, 29:55 finishers did 52.1 and 
52.8 (the winner did 58.0).  

I say the 48.4 splits are about impossible, and the 10K times should be stricken from 
the all-time lists.

gh



Re: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Derderian

Let's delete this dichotomy entirely. Speed and endurance are not
antithetical abilities. Think of it this way: if a runner had infinite speed
and no endurance, the athlete would go nowhere quickly and in the converse,
infinite endurance and no speed, the athlete would go nowhere and but not
get tired. Of course list members are free to play with this reduction to
absurdity.

I think the point Lydiard and other have made is that young runners must
avoid running in oxygen debt but do benefit from running very fast, even
all-out, frequently for short burst no longer than 10 or 20 seconds, or the
amount of time it takes to get to the soccer ball or first base.

Tom Derderian, Greater Boston Track Club

- Original Message -
From: alan tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 7:16 PM
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)


 It is much more
 important to develop speed at a younger age because you can't reclaim it
 when you're older.

 Could someone delete this sentence from existance? Speed before endurance?
 M...dunno bout that one..;) That must be why hoards of Africans are
 running so well. You must develop a sound base of aerobic endurance
through
 easy mileage and hard aerobic runs (threshold runs) before you introduce
 speed. Too much hard speedwork, not enough hard aerobic runs, that is part
 of the problem. Not training specifically for the marathon is yet another
 problem. Run a lot, week after week after week.

 Alan
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com





t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Jimenez

Don't forget that Devery's prep marathon best was set at Trail's
End in oregon (not the fastest course around). He could have
certainly run faster in a warm weather, no wind, flat and fast
course.

-Tom





Re: t-and-f: Track accuracy

2001-04-04 Thread John Lunn

OR the Net

Dan Kaplan wrote:

 Never trust what you read in the paper.  ;-)

 Dan

 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There was an article in the Oregonian newspaper today about the track at
  Willamette University in Salem. During some recent work to the track
  they discovered that each lap was actually 406m.  The steeplechase was
  the only event that was accurately measured.  No one is sure when the
  mistake was made, but it has probably been like that for some time.
  Just made me wonder how many other tracks like that are around.
 
  Matthew

 =
 http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
 http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...
 
   @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
 _/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
/   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text




RE: t-and-f: Re: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread Mcewen, Brian T

Chapa ran his 28:32.7 at the '76 Drake Relays.  He placed third I believe.

Not sure who the Tennessee guy is ... but could it be Pat Davey (Brother
Rice HS, '75)?

-Original Message-
From: Richard McCann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: Re: HS records



the runner-up at 10k is 28:55.0 by Eric Hulst in 1976.

Hulst's was second to Chapa, and Bill McChessney was third in about 29:06, 
all at the US Juniors in Knoxville.  They all were involved in a hot race 
the previous year as well in which the winner (who's name escapes me, but 
went to Tennessee and  ran well in the NCAA 10k one year) scared Lindgren's 
record.  Chapa ran in the 76 US Trials, but only around 30:00 in the heats.

Richard McCann



t-and-f: Fw: USATF Release: Golden Spike Tour headlines eventful season of TF

2001-04-04 Thread phalford

I notice ESPN are showing the Princeton Invitational three weeks after it
happens.  I've noticed this sort of thing happens quite often in the U.S.

I can understand stations may not have an immediate gap in the schedule but
three weeks!  Is ESPN a history channel or something?

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:11 PM
Subject: USATF Release: Golden Spike Tour headlines eventful season of TF


 Contact:Jill M. Geer
 Director of Communications
 317-261-0500
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.usatf.org

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Wednesday, April 4, 2001

 U.S. athletes on the road to Edmonton
 2001 Outdoor Golden Spike Tour headlines
 eventful season of track and field

 INDIANAPOLIS - Two IAAF Grand Prix meets highlight USA Track  Field's
 2001 Outdoor Golden Spike Tour, announced Wednesday. The 2001 Outdoor
Golden
 Spike Tour is part of a banner year for track and field in North America,
 with a full plate of world-class track and field on the track and on TV.
 Sponsored by adidas, GMC Envoy, Visa, SoBe Sports System, and Pontiac
 Grand Prix, this year's edition of USATF's signature event features the
 strongest schedule of the Tour's three-year history. Three nationally
 televised Golden Spike Tour meets lead up to the GMC Envoy USA Outdoor
Track
  Field Championships, where Team USA's roster for the 2001 World Outdoor
 Track  Field Championships in Edmonton, Canada, will be selected.
 "With Grand Prix Tour status for two meets, the success of Team USA at
 the Olympics and the buildup to the 2001 World Championships on North
 American soil, this is an exceptionally exciting year for the Golden Spike
 Tour," USATF CEO Craig Masback said. "2000 was a record-setting year for
 track and field in terms of attendance, and we have a chance to build on
that
 success. With a full schedule this year, track and field will be on center
 stage through much of the summer."
 Many of the U.S. athletes who brought fans the most memorable moments
of
 the 2000 Olympic Games will compete for significant prize money, in front
of
 big crowds and before a national television audience as they head down the
 Road to Edmonton.
 As a prelude to the Golden Spike Tour, the elite USATF outdoor season
 kicks off April 28 with USA vs. THE WORLD at the Penn Relays, a special
event
 within the Penn Relays that pits Team USA's top talent against relay teams
 from around the world. At USA vs. THE WORLD in 2000, the Marion
 Jones-anchored Team USA 4x200m relay broke a 20-year-old world record.
 Expanded sponsor backing has helped build upon last year's successful
event.
 In 2001, Nike, GMC Envoy, Visa, SoBe Sports System and Pontiac Grand Prix
are
 contributing their support to the event.
 The Golden Spike Tour gets rolling May 12 with the Princeton
Invitational
 in New Jersey and continues June 3 with the adidas Oregon Track Classic
 (Grand Prix II) in Portland, Ore.; June 9 with the U.S. Open (Grand Prix
I)
 in Palo Alto, Calif.; and June 21-24 with the GMC Envoy Outdoor
Championships
 in Eugene, Ore. Athletes competing at Golden Spike Tour meets will be
 announced at a later date.
 In addition to organizing the Golden Spike Tour, USA Track  Field is
 joining forces with the nation's top relay meets in an effort to further
 elite athlete development. The Fresno Relays April 7; Kansas Relays April
 18-21; Mt. SAC Relays April 20-22; Drake Relays April 27-28; and Modesto
 Relays May 12 all will receive Golden Spike Tour "satellite" designation
and
 will put on events featuring America's stars of the future.
 "All of these relay meets are steeped in history and draw some of the
 biggest track and field crowds in the world," Masback said. "We hope to
keep
 the momentum of the last several years going on every level from high
school
 to elite by covering the travel and housing costs of athletes in key
events
 of these meets."
 The United States also is the site of a third IAAF Grand Prix meet
with
 the Prefontaine Classic May 27 in Eugene, Ore. Now in its 27th year, the
 Prefontaine Classic is considered the premiere meet in the country, with
 international fields that typically feature numerous world record holders
and
 gold medalists. Like the Golden Spike Tour, the meet has a national
 television audience.
 A highlight of the summer TV schedule is a "Weekend of Track  Field,"
 which begins early on June 10. ESPN2's broadcast of the adidas Oregon
Track
 Classic begins the weekend at 12:30 a.m. ET Sunday morning - Saturday
night
 on the West Coast. Broadcasts continue with two more meets Sunday
afternoon,
 both on CBS: the NCAA Championships and the U.S. Open.
 U.S. meets are not the only major international events that American
 audiences will get to see. ABC and ESPN will be broadcasting the World
 Championships in early August, the IAAF Golden League series and the IAAF
 Grand Prix Final, 

Re: t-and-f: Track accuracy

2001-04-04 Thread Wayne T. Armbrust

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There was an article in the Oregonian newspaper today about the track at Willamette 
University in Salem. During some recent work to the track they discovered that each 
lap was actually 406m.  The steeplechase was the only event that was accurately 
measured.  No one is sure when the mistake was made, but it has probably been like 
that for some time.  Just made me wonder how many other tracks like that are around.

 Matthew

In my work as a track and field consultant, a major part of which is providing 
calculations and drawings for track markings, I encounter many mis-measured tracks, 
especially but not exclusively on the high school level.  About 25% or so of all high 
school tracks I have become involved with after construction was complete couldn't be 
marked without additional material being added either inside or outside the oval!

--
Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computomarx™
3604 Grant Ct.
Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA
(573) 445-6675 (voice  FAX)
http://www.Computomarx.com
"Know the difference between right and wrong...
Always give your best effort...
Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..."
- Coach Bill Sudeck (1926-2000)





RE: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread Mcewen, Brian T

1)
Where did McChesney run the 29:06.8?  Junior Nats?  Senior Nats?

I think it was in an open meet in Eugene.  

Where was Hulst's 28:55.0 run?  I heard it was run on a sub-standard track.

Anyone?

2)
For those of you who believe in "Purdy-style" equivalent charts, a 28:32 is
far superior to the 8:36 2-mile record and the 13:44 HS record  ...
according to those charts.

A 28:32 = 8:29y.

I guess, without charts, a 28:30-29:00 10k runner would have the opportunity
(back in the day at least) to have run an indoor 2-mile, or an outdoor
3-Mile or 5k ... and they could comment on which marks are truly "unreal" as
the subject line says ... 



Re: t-and-f: Records

2001-04-04 Thread ShepWest


In a message dated 4/4/01 10:54:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 but guys like Virgin, Hunt, Hulst, Williams, McChesney seemed to be 
running a lot more of the 5,000 , 10,000 type races ... Is that true or just 
a figment of my 
imagination ??? 

tis true.  Take '72 as a typical example-- 13 under 14:30 at 3M (but only 2 
under 15 at  5K), 20 under 31:50 at 6M, 8 under 32:30 at 10K and 28 under 
2:45 in the marathon.  Today one has to really search to find more than one 
or two performers under 15:00 (5K), 33:00(10K) and 3:00 hours in the marathon.

Jack Shepard



t-and-f: All-Star High School Team

2001-04-04 Thread Conning
In a message dated 4/4/01 9:22:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Conway Hill writes concerning Hawthorne HS of Hawthorne, California:

It was really the equivalent of an all star team ... 
The likes of which may never be seen again at a single school 

I think it is quite possible that we will see a team like that again.
Just look at little Modesto Christian in basketball. They had ex-49ers Bubba 
Paris' son plus three players from England. A school of 200+ students won 
the Northern California Division I (large schools) basketball title this year.
It is much easier now to go to another high school, rather than your 
neighborhood school.
Watch out for St. Mary's of Berkeley. They are building quite an outstanding 
team and coaching staff. Plus they added Rod Jett, who was ranked ninth in 
the US in the 110 hurdles in 1992, and Richie Boulet, who was ranked fourth 
in the US in the 1,500 in 1998, to their coaching staff this spring.
Senior Halihl Guy (St. Mary's, Berkeley) won the 110 hurdles (14.75 2.3) and 
400 hurdles (54.16) at the Stanford Invitational last Saturday with the 
coaching of Rod Jett.



Keith Conning
 735 Brookside Drive
Vacaville, CA 95688-3509
FAX: 707-778-7667 
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB: http://hometown.aol.com/conning/myhomepage/index.html


Re: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread alan tobin

Good lord, can we just let it be? Maybe every track in America is off by a 
fraction of an inch? That would make all times fraudulent. Maybe they all 
would have ran faster on today's synthetic tracks. It doesn't really matter. 
They ran the race, they recorded times, it's a done deal.

Alan


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:39:17 EDT

In a message dated Wed, 4 Apr 2001  3:04:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
Richard McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hulst's was second to Chapa, and Bill McChessney was third in about 
29:06,  all at the US Juniors in Knoxville. 

Rich is confusing two races: Chapa set the 10K HSR of 28:32.7 at Drake in 
'76. At Knoxville in '75 Chapa and Hulst both set the previous HSR of 
29:11.2.

In retrospect, I think all the 10K marks at Knoxville that year (and who 
knows how many other years) were fraudulent. I only have some skimpy 
empirical evidence to go on, but consider this: Well, first,  you need to 
understand that the track was 440y, not 400m, so they had to run 6M (24 
laps) plus 376y. Let's assume the track was indeed 440y (and in a post 
several months back I posited that I thought/think that the track itself 
was short as a 440y oval to begin with, but that's another matter).

I don't think they measured the 376y part properly; they came out short.

Based on 6M splits, Chapa and Hulst (a pair of 17-year-olds) ran that last 
376y in 48.4 seconds. On a hot, wet day in Knoxville, do I think they could 
finish a 10K at 56.3 pace? NOT!

Let's consider some other evidence. Looking at earlier WR races, back when 
6M was still an accepted distance, we find that in Ron Clarke's 27:39.4 he 
finished in 52.4. In an unratified 28:14.0 he ran 51.4. When Sandor Iharos 
WRed at 28:42.8 he needed 59.0 to finish. Were these 17-year-olds, in tough 
conditions, that much better than WR setters? I think not.

And the next year, when Chapa ran the 28:32, his last 376y took him 56.3.

In a "furious sprint" for 3rd and 4th at the '64 NCAA, 29:55 finishers did 
52.1 and 52.8 (the winner did 58.0).

I say the 48.4 splits are about impossible, and the 10K times should be 
stricken from the all-time lists.

gh

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread ShepWest


In a message dated 4/4/01 12:52:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Where did McChesney run the 29:06.8?  Junior Nats?  Senior Nats?


I think it was in an open meet in Eugene.  


Where was Hulst's 28:55.0 run?  I heard it was run on a sub-standard track. 

McChesney's 29:06.8 was for 3rd at the Oregon Invitational Relays in 
mid-March.  Hulst's 28:55.0 was at UC Irvine at their Meet of Champions (2nd) 
in late March.

Jack Shepard



RE: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread Joel Tetreault


 
 NO!!! This is precisely what is wrong with American marathoning! You can't just 
train for the 5K/10K, add a few long runs, and then run a good marathon. You have to 
train specifically for the 42.195K. You can have a period where you do 5K/10K 
training and racing, but you need a good 3 months of marathon-specific work.
 sideshow
 

didn't Todd Williams runs his PR in the marathon (and on his debut) based
off of his 5k/10k training?  then after switching to the higher
mileage/less speed marathon program he didn't do as well.  

of course this is just one guythough i hear khannouchi basically
sticks with his 10k based road racing program but adds long tempo runs of
20M when a marathon is coming up.

joel




t-and-f: East German women all looked peculiar

2001-04-04 Thread Conning
In a message dated 4/4/01 9:22:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


The East German women all looked peculiar in that there was no body hair at
all but they were very muscled. All had very large protruding hipflexor 
muscles
like eggs near their hips! Steve Bennett

I attended an All-Star Meet between the U.S. and East Germany at the Los 
Angeles Coliseum in 1966. I was seated on the aisle. Two athletes walked by 
and I could only see their legs. I assumed it was two male athletes. To my 
surprise it was two East German women.




Keith Conning
 735 Brookside Drive
Vacaville, CA 95688-3509
FAX: 707-778-7667 
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB: http://hometown.aol.com/conning/myhomepage/index.html


RE: t-and-f: Re: unreal 10K times (was: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread Mcewen, Brian T

 (and in a post several months back I posited that I thought/think that
the track itself was short as a 440y oval to begin with, but that's another
matter). 


In light of these types of "shortcomings" ... Is every track, where a record
of any importance is broken (AR, WR, NR), ALWAYS known to be 400m according
to the IAAF measurement specifications?

Or, do they just assume that the meet had records set there before ... and
let the status quo alone?

I know the measurement process for field events is rigorous, is a "survey"
done of the track after a record?


OLD JOKE:  My running friend used to say that the Bislett track was short
(Dream mile).

He said that every June, Steve Scott camped out in the infield overnight and
painted the lines in a little closer each year.







Re: t-and-f: Track accuracy

2001-04-04 Thread Mpplatt

In a message dated 4/4/01 4:27:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 During some recent work to the track they discovered that each lap was 
 actually 406m.  
How many laps does this track have? ;-)

Mike



Re: t-and-f: Records (HS marathon)

2001-04-04 Thread Ed Dana Parrot

 didn't Todd Williams runs his PR in the marathon (and on his debut) based
 off of his 5k/10k training?  then after switching to the higher
 mileage/less speed marathon program he didn't do as well.

 of course this is just one guythough i hear khannouchi basically
 sticks with his 10k based road racing program but adds long tempo runs of
 20M when a marathon is coming up.

Well, if Todd altered his program to have "less speed" and replaced it with
easy mileage, no wonder he got slower.

It's impossible to say definitively that adding a few long/tempo runs to
5K/10K training works or doesn't work.  A lot of it depends on what your
5k/10K training was like to begin with.  How fast do you run on your easy
days, how hard are your hard days?

Many of the really successful runners have quite a bit of work at marathon
pace or faster.  My understanding of Dr. Rosa's system, for example, is that
they take this to an extreme and never do the really fast stuff, but have at
least a portion of their run at marathon pace of faster 5 or 6 times per
week.  It is 85-90% workouts done day after day after day that do the trick.
Some 5K/10K runners are already doing this to some extent, which is why they
don't have to alter their training all that much to do a good marathon.

The risk of injury or burnout is significant, but so are the potential
rewards.

- ed Parrot




RE: t-and-f: Re: HS records

2001-04-04 Thread malmo

George Watts? Pat Davey? Where's my prize?

malmo



  They all were involved in a hot race
 the previous year as well in which the winner (who's name escapes me, but
 went to Tennessee and  ran well in the NCAA 10k one year) scared
 Lindgren's
 record.  Chapa ran in the 76 US Trials, but only around 30:00 in
 the heats.

 Richard McCann





t-and-f: New Speedometers

2001-04-04 Thread Mccarthy, Glenn

If anyone has used the new FitSense or Nike "Speedometers" (devices that
calculate distance run etc), and is willing to share your experiences and
thoughts, I would appreciate your thoughts.  Email me directly if you
prefer.

Glenn McCarthy



Re: t-and-f: All-Star High School Team

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Conning wrote:

In a message dated 4/4/01 9:22:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Conway Hill writes concerning Hawthorne HS of Hawthorne, California:

  It was really the equivalent of an all star team ...
 

I think it is quite possible that we will see a team like that again.
Just look at little Modesto Christian in basketball.  They had ex-49ers 
Bubba
Paris' son plus three players from England.  A school of 200+ students won
the Northern California Division I (large schools) basketball title this 
year.
It is much easier now to go to another high school, rather than your
neighborhood school.
Watch out for St. Mary's of Berkeley.  They are building quite an 
outstanding
team and coaching staff. Plus they added Rod Jett, who was ranked ninth in
the US in the 110 hurdles in 1992, and Richie Boulet, who was ranked fourth
in the US in the 1,500 in 1998, to their coaching staff this spring.
Senior Halihl Guy (St. Mary's, Berkeley) won the 110 hurdles (14.75 2.3) 
and
400 hurdles (54.16) at the Stanford Invitational last Saturday with the
coaching of Rod Jett.


True Modesto Christian did do that ... Underwent a lot of scrutiny however, 
and everything had to be perfectly in place ... But if I were going to see 
it done (at least in N CA) it would be in Berkeley ... There has always been 
a lot of questions there regarding attendance lines and who should be at 
what school ... Even back in the Pete Richardson, Kenny Robinson, Sharon 
Ware days when they were ruling the state ... And the CIF doesn't like that 
sort of thing too much ... So it can be done ... And St Marys may be doing 
it ... But when the complaints start to come (and they will) I hope 
everything is in order ...

Even at that finding 4 teens in the same general community to average under 
46.8 per leg ... Hard under any conditions ... The Harrison twins came with 
2 from the same house and were only  3:13 or so ... Berkeley's all star 
squad (star sprinter, star half miler, star hurdler) smashed what was the 
previous record and "only" ran 3:08.94 ... Muir had another star laden team 
with Obea Moore and Sultan McCullough and "only" went 3:08.66 ... Roy 
Martin's teams with him running 44 sec anchors never broke 3:09.00 ...

The 3:07.40, along with Carter's 81'3 and a few discussed distance marks are 
almost other worldly 

Conway

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




t-and-f: Microsoft sponsors Commonwealth Games

2001-04-04 Thread Michael J. Roth

I found the following online and was surprised this had not been
discussed.  I had half-jokingly proposed this to Craig Masback about a
year ago, but it never went anywhere to my knowledge.  The big question
is, why are they not sponsoring this type of thing in the US?  Someone
out in TF land must have a contact here.

MJR

__

Microsoft sponsors Commonwealth Games



 LONDON (April 2, 2001 8:45 a.m. EDT http://www.sportserver.com) -
American
 computer giants Microsoft was announced Monday as an official sponsor
 for next year's Commonwealth Games in Manchester, England.

 The company founded by billionaire Bill Gates has signed up as an
official
 sponsor and technology supplier, giving the Games finances a
 much-needed multi-million pound boost.

 With 479 days to go before the Games open, Manchester 2002
 organizers have signed up only five official sponsors, the title given
to
 companies contributing more than 2 million pounds ($2.94 million) in
 support.

 Of the 62 million pounds ($91.14 million) targeted to stage the event
 profitably, only 30 million pounds ($44.1 million) has so far been
raised -
 but organizers remain hopeful that more sponsors will come on board in
 the next few months.

 Manchester recently drafted in many high-profile members of the Sydney
 Olympic organizing committee to assist with the build-up to the Games,
a
 similar style competition restricted to members of the Commonwealth, a
 group of countries largely made up of nations once part of the British
 Empire.

 And Manchester 2002 commercial director Niels de Vos remains upbeat
 that his team will make up the financial shortfall before the Games
begin.

 De Vos said: "Including this deal we have raised 30million pounds. We
are
 still in negotiations with other potential sponsors.

 "We are confident we can raise the remaining deficit through
sponsorship,
 broadcasting, ticketing and licensing.

 "It would be unfair to mention which companies we are talking with and
we
 will not comment on speculated names until agreements are reached. But
 we do not have financial worries."




Re: t-and-f: New Speedometers

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Derderian

Glenn,
Several of our GBTC guys have the FitSense devices and love them. It is like
having a certified course with you where every you go. With that and a heart
monitor all a runner might need is some CommonSense.  Of course I must
confess one of our guys invented it. (The FitSense device not CommonSense.)
I was part of a group trying to invent such a device at Nike in the early
80s. (we failed)
Tom Derderian, Greater Boston Track Club


- Original Message -
From: Mccarthy, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: t-and-f: New "Speedometers"


 If anyone has used the new FitSense or Nike "Speedometers" (devices that
 calculate distance run etc), and is willing to share your experiences and
 thoughts, I would appreciate your thoughts.  Email me directly if you
 prefer.

 Glenn McCarthy




Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread JimRTimes


In a message dated 4/4/01 11:41:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



ps--does anybody but a an over-40 sportswriter actually use the term 
"thinclad"
anymore?


How about "harrier"? If it wasn't for Marc Bloom, I doubt anyone would even 
know what the term means.

Jim Gerweck
Running Times



Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread RunrCoach

Where does the term "thinclad" come from?  I remember seeing it used in the 
local paper way back when in the 80s.  

Does anybody remember what basketball players were called?

A.C.

In a message dated 4/4/01 3:54:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ps--does anybody but a an over-40 sportswriter actually use the term 
"thinclad"
anymore?


How about "harrier"? If it wasn't for Marc Bloom, I doubt anyone would even 
know what the term means.

Jim Gerweck
Running Times 




t-and-f: Re: HS 10ks

2001-04-04 Thread Richard McCann

At 12:53 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote..
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:59:14 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Records


This discussion has brought up an interesting question.  Why has the 10k been
run so infrequently over the years?  It seems as though in the 70's it was
run at a regular rate, but now it is almost none existent.

The advent of the road race.  HS kids rarely ran road races at that 
time.  In 1976, I ran a race with 900 runners that was the biggest to date 
in Washington State.  Now that's typical.  There's a race every weekend, 
whereas they were maybe once a month, and a variety of distances in the 
1970s.  Running a 10k on the track seems a daunting task, while a road 10k 
is just another training run, but a bit faster.


Richard McCann




t-and-f: 1988 200 m

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
Who took the bronze in that race? And what was the time? I know Joe and 
Carl, but who took third?

Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: koch wr

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
Naw, 800 runners should run the 400IH

Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



RE: t-and-f: koch wr

2001-04-04 Thread Beard, Cory

Nah, 100/200 types should not run the 400.  They should run the 400 hurdles!

Cory Beard



Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread SMLurie
Basketball player were called cagers.

Steve


Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread Dan Kaplan

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anybody remember what basketball players were called?

Cagers?

Dan

=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...

  @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/



Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread Dgs1170
Cagers

Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



t-and-f: Jon Entine/Jim Brown

2001-04-04 Thread WMurphy25

I missed the beginning of the show, but Jon Entine, Jim Brown and John Edgar 
Wideman(?) are discussing race and athletics on Bob Costas' show on HBO. 
Don't know what time it airs in the rest of the country, but it will probably 
be repeated during the week.

Walt Murphy



Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread Donald Mcfarlin

Do Hash House Harriers count?  Lots of them!

Don

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 4/4/01 11:41:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 
 ps--does anybody but a an over-40 sportswriter actually use the term
 "thinclad"
 anymore?
 
 
 How about "harrier"? If it wasn't for Marc Bloom, I doubt anyone would even
 know what the term means.

 Jim Gerweck
 Running Times




Re: t-and-f: 1988 200 m

2001-04-04 Thread Kurt Bray

Darrell Asked:

Who took the bronze in that race?  And what was the time?  I know Joe and
Carl, but who took third?

Robson Da Silva in 20.04.

Kurt Bray
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Fullerton humor

2001-04-04 Thread Kurt Bray


How about "harrier"? If it wasn't for Marc Bloom, I doubt anyone would even
know what the term means.

Its literal meaning is one who chases hares.  But it's not too hard to see 
how that was stretched to mean cross country runners.

Kurt Bray

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: 1988 200 m

2001-04-04 Thread Conway Hill

Darrell wrote:


Who took the bronze in that race?  And what was the time?  I know Joe and
Carl, but who took third?


I believe that was Robson DaSilva in 20.04 ...

Conway
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com