Re: 1.63 Beta/7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Costas, Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 3:38:30 PM, you wrote: Pressing back returns you to the original screen (as should do), but doesn't refresh the list. So the listed details are incorrect... CP Confirmed. (Windows 98SE). Same, here, also Win98SE. Although the no header titles does not seem to effect Win98. - -- Best regards, Bill Kraski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPlL9CF+k60BsXnM1EQILwACgmzJq82qQPphR8AiJQ6C+WmgMHxkAoIQJ xud46PUXShorJ5rF9vk9atJm =mVHB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Richard, On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:42 + GMT (18/02/03, 05:50 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: I don't know what's happening but my sorting office filters are adjusting themselves on a regular basis here. I just posted a message complaining of no email from TB! only to find that it's suddenly arriving in my Opera folder as well as some personal mail and I can't see why. Artificial Intelligence: TB reprograms itself? ;-) Seriously though, please check what exactly has changed. the order of the filters, or the filter string or what. Your problem sounds a bit weird, but you know that. so let's figure it out. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. 7.Ihr Nachbar geht Ihnen auf den Wecker, weil er nachts um vier so laut klopft, das die Gaeste Ihrer Techno-Party dauernd aus dem Rhythmus kommen. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Stefan, Monday, February 17, 2003, 9:35:45 PM, you wrote: ST Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] All, ST Version 1.63 Beta/7 is now available from ST http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb163b07.rar ST OK, may be not too much, but still something :-) One bug that persists is importing pgp keys. Tried importing a nonexpiring key from a gnugp user, then checked his signature on one of his messages. The Bat! said it was an invalid key. I know this has been reported in prior betas. Just wanted to be sure someone didn't forget to fix it. - -- Best regards, Bill Kraski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPlMAel+k60BsXnM1EQJGNQCfbIQT3jWHhQUSN0Rb96pd2HI6c/MAn31K d99KywmVaYsnETfQr5CQ7ec6 =Dtve -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/7
Hello Stefan, On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:35:45 -0500 GMT (18/02/03, 09:35 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Version 1.63 Beta/7 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb163b07.rar Changes: There have been reports of double folders and missing folders, i.e. a bug introduced with beta/6. This is the reason I didn't use b6. I have now downloaded b7 and would like to know whether this bug has been fixed. While I would like to play with the new features, but I don't want to deal with that particular bug. Kindly clarify. Thanks! ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Energizer Bunny arrested, charged with battery. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, Bill Kraski wrote... ST Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] All, ST Version 1.63 Beta/7 is now available from ST http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb163b07.rar ST OK, may be not too much, but still something :-) One bug that persists is importing pgp keys. Tried importing a nonexpiring key from a gnugp user, then checked his signature on one of his messages. The Bat! said it was an invalid key. I know this has been reported in prior betas. Just wanted to be sure someone didn't forget to fix it. Did you sign the key, and make it a trusted key? What you are seeing might not be an invalid key, but an untrusted key... PGP's message is a little unclear, gnupg is a little clearer in that area. Sign the key you received (after verifying it), set the key to trusted, and revalidate the email. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPlMNhCuD6BT4/R9zEQI/YQCgx/HxvUxzw6IB+vb3mDuE6hZMcjsAoMHp dpWf8aNzG38zPZine6yOwd2c =pme3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
latest beta?
Hello tbbeta, I just joined the list. What is the latest beta and where do I get it? Thanks -- Best regards, Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.moneywebdirect.com ++ Ordinary people are making extraordinary money working from home on the Internet! Get FREE info by email. Send request to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ Composed on 2/18/2003 at 9:40 PM using The Bat Ver 1.62i Attachments = none _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML email X vCards / \ Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Thomas, On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 at 11:01 GMT +0700, a beagle known as Thomas Fernandez [TF] barked: TF Seriously though, please check what exactly has changed. the order of TF the filters, or the filter string or what. Another thing to check is: If your filters rely on address book groups, make sure the address book group referenced still exists. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal Have you ever imagined a world without hypothetical situations? Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: latest beta?
Hello Michael, Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 7:41:48 AM, you wrote: MLW I just joined the list. What is the latest beta and where MLW do I get it? Version 1.63 Beta/7 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb163b07.rar -- Best regards, ajsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Januk, On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 at 22:44:03[GMT -0800](which was 06:44 where I live) you wrote: Another thing to check is: If your filters rely on address book groups, make sure the address book group referenced still exists. I know your reply was to Thomas but was answering my original question. Some of the filters do and the address books do still exist. I've checked everything possible and think I've cracked it although still at a loss as to why it all went wrong in the first place :-( -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 SpamPal | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 | and using the best browser: Opera7 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 at 11:01:05[GMT +0700](which was 04:01 where I live) you wrote: Artificial Intelligence: TB reprograms itself? ;-) You're not far of that :-) Seriously I have found settings change. Seriously though, please check what exactly has changed. the order of the filters, or the filter string or what. Your problem sounds a bit weird, but you know that. so let's figure it out. I finally sorted the problem (I hope) by resorting the filter order and making sure every box had Options/Queue in outbox selected apart from all my mailing lists which have send immediate and, so far, it's worked. What I don't understand is why sorting should change when I didn't change anything myself. None of my rules are complicated -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 SpamPal | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 | and using the best browser: Opera7 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jonathan, Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 11:52:16 PM, you wrote: JA Did you sign the key, and make it a trusted key? What you are seeing JA might not be an invalid key, but an untrusted key... PGP's message JA is a little unclear, gnupg is a little clearer in that area. Sign JA the key you received (after verifying it), set the key to trusted, JA and revalidate the email. I did, now. And reverified by checking your signature. Same results prior to signing setting as trusted. - -- Best regards, Bill Kraski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPlMsWV+k60BsXnM1EQI57wCfUE5jJB5v0XKB6N+Zv84fUOiv+bYAoMKV z1rmljfjd7E6tTtqmDs5+Nxj =rCON -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/7
Hello Jonathan, On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 at 13:16 GMT -0600, electricians were shocked that Jonathan Angliss [JA] potentially scribbled: JA http://thebat.netdork.net/fmaint.jpg, if you look at the very top, JA there are separated columns, but no headers. It must be XP or your XP skin. On Win98 the headings do exist: http://www.aggarwal.ca/tb/Maintenance%20Center.png -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A There is no such place as the University of Wis-cosine, and if there was, the motto of their mathematics department would not be Secant ye shall find. Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Richard, On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 at 06:50 GMT +, a witness saw Richard Wakeford [RW] type: Another thing to check is: If your filters rely on address book groups, make sure the address book group referenced still exists. RW I know your reply was to Thomas but was answering my original RW question. Well, I was really responding to you, but I only had an extension to what Thomas already wrote... RW Some of the filters do and the address books do still exist. You probably know this, but to be sure: The address books exist, but do the groups referenced in your filters exist? You should confirm by trying to change the group referenced in the filter. If the group you really want doesn't live in that listing, then you've found your problem. Similarly, check colour groups, etc. The only reason I'm harping on this point is that it has happened to me, and the symptoms sound exactly as you describe. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal I simply wasn't cool enough for them (whomever they were) to offer drugs to me. Drugs were everywhere, that's what the TV said. I could get offered drugs at any time. Yeah, right. -- J. Sullivan Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Weird sorting office goings on
Hello Januk, On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 at 22:59:05[GMT -0800](which was 06:59 where I live) you wrote: Similarly, check colour groups, etc. That was one thing I had to change, all my advanced options suddenly had must be associated with a colour group selected but only when there was a colour group to select. The only reason I'm harping on this point is that it has happened to me, and the symptoms sound exactly as you describe. No problem. when things go wrong with TB! they can sometimes do it in a big way! No more replies for 4 days as I'm just going away so I'm not being rude :-) -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 SpamPal | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 | and using the best browser: Opera7 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
