Re[2]: X

2004-10-31 Thread Gunivortus Goos

 That's why I asked for the option to configure it to each wishes,
 either down to the systray or exit. Then each of us can have her/his
 own preference here.

 Programs currently running that behave this way with
 or without the option to configure the X buttons behaviour:

 My antivirus agent .. F-Secure or Kapersky antivirus
cut..

Yes, here too are such programs. Add f.i. Some other
and emailclients that excellent Spamfilter K9 for TB to them
and many more, like:
Serv-U FTP Server
Trillian
BlackIce Firewall
Yankee Clipper (great XP clipboard replacement!)
etc...etc.

How is it? Did at least one of the coding-people read this
thread? :-)

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Gunivortus Goos   

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under WinXP Pro 5, built 2600, Service Pack 1
 

   ... Acid test? You are soaking in it...




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gunivortus Goos  everyone else

31-Okt-2004 07:35, you wrote:

 How is it? Did at least one of the coding-people read this
 thread? :-)

I'd you can go open a Wish on BT and let us know the URL, so people can add
their support notes.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

Deliplayer2 is playing: 2nd Level Distance by Pete Namlook  Wolfram Spyra
 from the 2000 album 'Virtual Vices II'



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Guten Tag Alexander,

ASK I'd you can go open a Wish on BT and let us know the URL,
ASK so people can add their support notes.

OK... did that... for the first time, I hope, I did it correct.
The link is:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3999

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Gunivortus Goos   

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under WinXP Pro 5, built 2600, Service Pack 1
 

   ... Drive C:\ formatting...  Press any key to continue...




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Series of AV's followed by a crash

2004-10-31 Thread Raymund Thomas Tump
Hi TBBeta,

I had some AV related with the Trash on IMAP (as far as I can see,
there are gone now). The problem wasn't in TB! itself but in the
NTDLL, so something must be very wrong here.

See attached picture.

-- 
I'm already gone,
Raymund

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Service Pack 2attachment: myav1.PNG
 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: IMAP: new revision

2004-10-31 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Chris,

On Saturday, October 30, 2004 09:04 your local time, which was 08:04 my
local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote;

CW Just received an AV @ 009A2810 - Read of address 00B8.

I've just received this AV again. It seems to happen just after starting
and pressing Alt-F2 to check all accounts. Once it's done it once, it
doesn't appear to happen again.
-- 
Regards,

Chris

Created using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush  IMAP
OS of Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Cleaning up SPAM with Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.6



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Thomas,

Friday, October 29, 2004, 4:00:24 PM, you wrote:



 Hello TBBETA,

 The reason for this test is that I get the following error message
 when trying to send another message:

 !29/10/2004, 22:58:53: SEND  - Server reports error. The response
 is: 5.7.0 {mp011} Sender address does not belong to logged in user




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Beta testing (was: Re: 3022 is awfull)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Roelof,

Thursday, October 28, 2004, 9:27:03 PM, you wrote:



 Hallo MaXxX,

 On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:55:34 +0200GMT (28-10-2004, 19:55 +0200, where
 I live), you wrote:

M I'm asking for a way to make betatesting easier, as it was for the
M short time between introducing the /REG parameter and turning to MSI
M installations.

 Well, you could always configure another user account in Windows 2000
 and do a second install. I realize that that might not be the optimal
 solution for you, but IMO beta testing should be done with a working
 configuration as beta testing should be testing whether the thing
 works in everyday use.
 Since everybody need to make his own decisions about running his/her
 system, you and I are entitled to different opinions on how to run
 tests.
 Never mind the cookie though. ;-)




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Thomas,

Friday, October 29, 2004, 4:05:34 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Thomas,

 On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:00:24 +0700 GMT (29/10/2004, 23:00 +0700 GMT),
 Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF !29/10/2004, 22:58:53: SEND  - Server reports error. The
TF response is: 5.7.0 {mp011} Sender address does not belong to
TF logged in user

 The sender address *does* belong. This message came through didn't it?
 I'll go hunting in the headers and see what's wrong with the other
 message.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Where to get latest betas)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marck,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:52:13 PM, you wrote:



 Dear John,

 @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick:

JM cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version?

 moderator
 Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
 just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
 instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out John.

   '

 This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.

 Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
 message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
 encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
 because 

 a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
top of the message

 and

 b) It encourages excessive quoting.

 We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
 which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
 and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
 responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
 part separately and follow each part with your response.

 Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
 you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
 respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active
 members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being
 asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership
 here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group
 when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and
 understand.

 To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
 private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
 subscribed.

 Thank you.
 /moderator




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where to get latest betas

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marck,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:54:35 PM, you wrote:



 Dear John,

 @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick:

JM cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version?

 Peter Meyns already did in this very thread.
 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30201.rar




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where to get latest betas

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Nick,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 1:16:53 PM, you wrote:



 On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, at 6:14:40 AM, Chris wrote:

 I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on
 ritlabs the bat! beta site? 

 I wondered as well, because for the longest time you could find the latest
 Beta here: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

 Instead now they've chosen to go with one URL at the time of release for
 some reason. shrug





Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where to get latest betas

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Peter,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 11:04:16 AM, you wrote:



 Hi Chris,

 on Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:30:14 -0400GMT, you wrote:

C I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on
C ritlabs the bat! beta site?  How did they get on betanews if it's
C not public beta?

 It was announced on this list to be at
 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30201.rar
 and that's where I found it.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Where to get latest betas)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marck,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:52:24 PM, you wrote:



 Dear John,

 @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick:

NA Instead now they've chosen to go with one URL at the time of
NA release for some reason. shrug


JM 
JM  Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
JM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
JM IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
JM http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

 moderator
 Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
 just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
 instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out John.

   '

 Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
 of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
 This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
 the signature and list footers since everything below and including
 the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting. 

 You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in
 your templates.

 Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
 difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
 courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added
 to your signature by the list server.

 To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
 private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
 subscribed.

 Thank you.
 /moderator




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where to get latest betas

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello John,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:49:28 PM, you wrote:



 cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version? For some
 reason I've noticed you all using a version later than the one that is
 on the official beta page on Ritlabs.
 I swear I have never experienced software that I have both HATED and
 LOVED at the same time!

 Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 8:16:53 AM, you wrote:
NA I wondered as well, because for the longest time you could find the latest
NA Beta here: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

NA Instead now they've chosen to go with one URL at the time of release for
NA some reason. shrug


 
  Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
 IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers



Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Where to get latest betas

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Chris,

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 5:30:14 AM, you wrote:



 Hello All,

 I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on
 ritlabs the bat! beta site?  How did they get on betanews if it's
 not public beta?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: [IGNORE] Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Christian,

Monday, October 18, 2004, 8:22:44 AM, you wrote:



 Just a test for the subscription to the listing! :)




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Testing Scheduled items

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Michael,

Monday, October 18, 2004, 4:46:23 AM, you wrote:



 TB BETA ERS,

 I would like to test the scheduled items I have setup without changing
 the time.  I understand that I can change the time to a minute from
 now, but a simple - run now command would be great.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello MAU,

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:43:01 AM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 Strange. If 9Val doesn't succeed in fixing this in the upcoming beta,
 I guess I should try a reinstall. If I couldn't reproduce on my second
 PC, I would already have done a reinstall. As I said, time to wait for
 the upcoming beta.
 
 Thanks for testing!

 There _is_ something wrong with VF auto-refreshing though. First refer
 to what I write in my
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to
 9Val.

 Now look at the attached PNGs. Although Peter Ouwehand's message shows
 as replied in my TBBeta folder (after moving out and in again) the same
 message in my To Me VF doesn't appear as replied even though the VF
 has been auto refreshed several times when receiving more replies to me.
 The replied flag/icon appears to be updated only when doing a manual
 refresh of the VF.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:30:22 AM, you wrote:




 On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 13:26, MAU wrote:

 Your mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a reply to me.
 It was properly coloured by incoming filter and my To Me VF was
 properly updated with no need to refresh it.

 Strange. If 9Val doesn't succeed in fixing this in the upcoming beta,
 I guess I should try a reinstall. If I couldn't reproduce on my second
 PC, I would already have done a reinstall. As I said, time to wait for
 the upcoming beta.

 Thanks for testing!




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello MAU,

Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:26:02 AM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 Yes, 14 CGs at the moment. And yes, I do have a number of VFs
 filtering on some of them and everything seems to work fine here.
 However, please note that I have not upgraded/downgraded ;-) to
 3.0.2.1 yet.
 
 For me it broke when switching to 3.0.2.1. Can you please install this
 version to give it a try? You could always go back afterwards.

 Your mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a reply to me. It
 was properly coloured by incoming filter and my To Me VF was properly
 updated with no need to refresh it.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello MAU,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 10:35:54 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 For me it broke when switching to 3.0.2.1. Can you please install this
 version to give it a try? You could always go back afterwards.

 I'll give a try tomorrow, OK?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello 9Val,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:41:18 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Boris,  

BA I don't think either. But maybe? I'm running WinXP SP1. But AFAIK 9Val
BA has done something with updating (to get manual refiltering of a lot
BA of messages quicker) - this maybe causes your problem?

 It seems so




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello 9Val,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:42:48 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,  

MO 9Val, any ideas?

 Have responsed twice already ;)




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Boris,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:20:28 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:06 you wrote at 
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not
 list newly received messages matching the search criteria.
 Can't confirm.
 I created a filter, which marks any message with a color group, and
 a VF which filters this or another color group: It works fine here.
 Automatically updating your VF at once when the mails are received.
 Yes.

 Strange, as I said, I can reproduce on two different machines (both
 running W2K, but I suspect this isn't OS dependent).
 I don't think either. But maybe? I'm running WinXP SP1. But AFAIK 9Val
 has done something with updating (to get manual refiltering of a lot
 of messages quicker) - this maybe causes your problem? Don't know,
 maybe Ritlabs/9Val can say something? Or another one can test?

 I suppose you are running v3.0.2.1?
 I tested it with this, yes.

 Your signature doesn't reveal, neither does your headers.
 Would only confuse - I test mostly on current betas - but use still
 2.12.03 Final (and write to list also with this version).





Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:32:55 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:20, Boris Anders wrote:

 Strange, as I said, I can reproduce on two different machines (both
 running W2K, but I suspect this isn't OS dependent).

 I don't think either. But maybe? I'm running WinXP SP1. But AFAIK
 9Val has done something with updating (to get manual refiltering of
 a lot of messages quicker) - this maybe causes your problem? Don't
 know, maybe Ritlabs/9Val can say something?

 OK, if no one else can confirm, I guess it's time to wait for a word
 from 9Val. Meanwhile, I guess I'll go back to the release version, I
 never thought I would be this dependent on VFs...

 Your signature doesn't reveal, neither does your headers.

 Would only confuse - I test mostly on current betas - but use still
 2.12.03 Final (and write to list also with this version).

 Ah, I see.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:47:52 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:42, 9Val wrote:

MO OK, if no one else can confirm, I guess it's time to wait for a
MO word from 9Val.

 There are some optimizations in message change notifications, so
 seems like sometimes that notifications are lost at all

 Good to hear you have an idea what's wrong. Just tell me when there is
 a new version to test. I'm off again, thanks for your response.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello 9Val,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:42:03 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,  


MO OK, if no one else can confirm, I guess it's time to wait for a word
MO from 9Val.

 There are some optimizations in message change notifications, so seems
 like sometimes that notifications are lost at all




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 3:36:25 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:27, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 What I didn't notice earlier was that as soon as I viewed the message
 in my TBBETA folder, the count of my VF increased, just as it should
 have done when the message was received.

 No, it's not when I view the message, it's when the status change from
 Unread to Read. Sorry for that.

 I am leaving my computer for a few hours, if my not to precise bug
 report seem to cause confusion, I'll try to summarise it when I get
 back.

 Until then, have a nice morning/day/evening/night.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 3:27:45 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:15, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not list
 newly received messages matching the search criteria.

 I am sorry for this maybe confusing bug report, I seem to discover
 things every time I post to the list.

 I just got the message I am currently replying to. It was correctly
 marked with a colour group, the count of my TBBETA folder increased and
 my TBBETA folder announced one unread message. The count of my mentioned
 VF did not increase, neither did it announce any unread messages. Just
 like I described earlier.

 What I didn't notice earlier was that as soon as I viewed the message in
 my TBBETA folder, the count of my VF increased, just as it should have
 done when the message was received.

 So, all I know is that auto refresh is only broke when new messages are
 received and assigned a colour group by the NFS and the search criteria
 is colour group. It might be broke in other situations as well, but this
 is all I can confirm right now.

 9Val, any ideas?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Boris,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 5:56:39 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:15 you wrote at 
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does
 NOT auto refresh.

 After which action VF should be updated? I create a VF, same
 condition, but when I change the color group of a message VF is
 updated.

 When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not list
 newly received messages matching the search criteria.

 Can't confirm.

 I created a filter, which marks any message with a color group, and a
 VF which filters this or another color group: It works fine here. I
 receive nearly 300 mails and played arround with different conditions
 - I can't reproduce it. But maybe 9Val can?






Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:41:09 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:32, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 Meanwhile, I guess I'll go back to the release version, I  never
 thought I would be this dependent on VFs...

 Back to 3.0.1.33 and my VFs are working again, good it wasn't a
 permanent damage.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 2:20:32 PM, you wrote:



 Testing auto refreshing VFs. One of my VFs set to show messages sent by
 me didn't catch my last message to tbbeta until manually refreshed. I'll
 see if the same thing happens again.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: test - Please Ignore

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Maxim,

Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 3:13:03 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Shemming,

 won't ignore! ;-)




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello 9Val,

Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 4:52:48 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Günther,  

GE Can you maybe give us a hint how you like the reports most? E.g. when I
GE first tried IMAP, it crashed with an AV. You want a screenshot of the AV
GE (and an explanation when it occured)

 Explanation  when  it  occured, if it will be non-reproducable address
 can help

GE - to your PM address
GE - to this list
GE - in the bugtracker?

 Destination  hasn't  matter,  it  should  be  announced  and should be
 non-forgotten.

GE Just the text message of the AV? Or just the bug report?

 At least report, developer will ask additional information he needs

GE When answering to an announcement of you, should the subject just be
GE adjusted with a short description of the bug or should the references be
GE deleted so that a new thread begins?

 To start new threads would be better

 So  my  point  was  to  report and periodically ask to fix bugs, it is
 quite  nervous  when  all  are quiet and before release somebody says:
 Hey, I have a show-stopper here and it was for a long time, would you
 fix it? Or  something like this: Hey, I don't like how program works
 at all. It is normal, when it is said after feedback from both sides,
 but  it  is  abnormal  (at  least for me) after a long silence on this
 question from testers side.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 3:15:18 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 16:54, Boris Anders wrote:

 My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does
 NOT auto refresh.

 After which action VF should be updated? I create a VF, same
 condition, but when I change the color group of a message VF is
 updated.

 When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not list
 newly received messages matching the search criteria.

 When they are listed, any manipulation of a message is reflected in the
 VF as well.

 I have a filter looking for message sent by me or containing @canit.se
 in the reference field. If matched, the filter assigns a colour group to
 the message (yes, this part still works). Until switching to v3.0.2.1 my
 VF looking for messages with this colour group assigned was
 automatically updated every time a message matching the conditions
 described above was received, now it isn't anymore.

 Hope that made the situation more clear.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:07:44 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 20:00, MAU wrote:

 MAU, I know you use colour groups extensively, do you use VFs
 filtering on these colour groups as well?

 Yes, 14 CGs at the moment. And yes, I do have a number of VFs
 filtering on some of them and everything seems to work fine here.
 However, please note that I have not upgraded/downgraded ;-) to
 3.0.2.1 yet.

 For me it broke when switching to 3.0.2.1. Can you please install this
 version to give it a try? You could always go back afterwards.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:06:30 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 19:56, Boris Anders wrote:

 When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not
 list newly received messages matching the search criteria.

 Can't confirm.

 I created a filter, which marks any message with a color group, and
 a VF which filters this or another color group: It works fine here.

 Automatically updating your VF at once when the mails are received.
 Strange, as I said, I can reproduce on two different machines (both
 running W2K, but I suspect this isn't OS dependent).

 I suppose you are running v3.0.2.1? Your signature doesn't reveal,
 neither does your headers.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 2:38:33 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 16:20, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 Testing auto refreshing VFs. One of my VFs set to show messages sent by
 me didn't catch my last message to tbbeta until manually refreshed. I'll
 see if the same thing happens again.

 I've done some testing.

 My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does NOT
 auto refresh. Filter is set up like this:

  Colour is colourgroup1
  OR Colour is colourgroup2

 VFs filtering on age (advanced filtering) or Unread flag (fast search)
 still auto updates themselves though.

 Can someone confirm? MAU, I know you use colour groups extensively, do
 you use VFs filtering on these colour groups as well?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello MAU,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 6:00:46 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 MAU, I know you use colour groups extensively, do you use VFs
 filtering on these colour groups as well?

 Yes, 14 CGs at the moment. And yes, I do have a number of VFs filtering
 on some of them and everything seems to work fine here. However, please
 note that I have not upgraded/downgraded ;-) to 3.0.2.1 yet. I haven't
 even had the time to think and decide if I want to participate in this
 beta cycle from the beginning.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Günther,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 5:52:09 PM, you wrote:



 Hei,

 9Val wrote (and I removed the OT from the subject, because I think it on
 topic)

 Divide problems when it possible and we'll solve them part-by-part

 Can you maybe give us a hint how you like the reports most? E.g. when I
 first tried IMAP, it crashed with an AV. You want a screenshot of the AV
 (and an explanation when it occured)

 - to your PM address
 - to this list
 - in the bugtracker?

 Just the text message of the AV? Or just the bug report?

 When answering to an announcement of you, should the subject just be
 adjusted with a short description of the bug or should the references be
 deleted so that a new thread begins?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Bill,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 11:10:38 AM, you wrote:



 On Mon 4-Oct-04 5:38am -0400, Marcus Ohlström wrote:


 On Monday, October 4, 2004, 11:50, Bill McCarthy wrote:

 OK, I've reported this before but this time I've done some more
 testing.  TB! is giving error messages - AV's - when mail is sent.
 Not always, but enough to annoy.

 The first thing I've done is to turn off the NAV checking of
 outgoing mail.

 What about outgoing filters (not that I've seen those AV's myself, but I
 guess it's relevant to track the problem down).

 Thanks for responding.  No outgoing filters.

 POP3 or IMAP?

 POP3 - it was in my sig.

 Repeatable from all accounts or just one (if you have more then one)?

 Any folder related problems? Have you repaired and/or rebuilt you sent
 folder?

 No reported problems from folder maintenance.  As far as
 testing other accounts, I no longer seem to have the
 problem.  An interim beta appears to have fixed the problem.
 I've sent dozens of emails between many TB! sessions without
 a single AV.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: PGP (Was: Re: test - Please Ignore)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Stuart,

Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 3:31:10 PM, you wrote:




MM Hello Shemming,

MM won't ignore! ;-)
 OK then, perhaps you can tell me why I can't get my new TB! install to use
 my PGP8 keys




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 2:45:14 PM, you wrote:




 On Friday, October 15, 2004, 16:38, Marcus Ohlström wrote:

 My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does
 NOT auto refresh. Filter is set up like this:

  Colour is colourgroup1
  OR Colour is colourgroup2

 Confirmed on my second machine as well.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Bill,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 9:50:01 AM, you wrote:



 On Mon 4-Oct-04 4:00am -0400, 9Val wrote:

 Divide problems when it possible and we'll solve them part-by-part

 OK, I've reported this before but this time I've done some
 more testing.  TB! is giving error messages - AV's - when
 mail is sent.  Not always, but enough to annoy.

 The first thing I've done is to turn off the NAV checking of
 outgoing mail.

 I then sent 15 emails to me.  Here are the results:

 No Problem
 Access violation at address 011C. Read of address 011C.
 Access violation at address 0088. Read of address 0088.
 Access violation at address 011C. Read of address 011C.
 No Problem
 Access violation at address 011C. Read of address 011C.
 Access violation at address 0090. Read of address 0090.
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem

 Hmm, seems to get better with time.  I shut down TB! and
 tried again 10 times:

 Access violation at address 00C8. Read of address 00C8.
 Access violation at address 0538. Read of address 0538.
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem

 Seems to be just at the start.  I repeated the process of
 shutting down TB! and performing 10 tests (mails to self). I
 did this 3 times and all 30 sent mails went out clean - now
 I'm really annoyed g  Time to clear out my receiving and
 Sent Mail folders.

 None of these AV's has resulted in other strange behavior of
 TB! - I only closed TB! for testing.

 I'm turning my NAV back on for checking outgoing mail - I
 like the little confirming animation at the bottom of the
 screen :-)




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Boris,

Friday, October 15, 2004, 2:54:21 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Marcus,

 Friday, October 15, 2004, 16:38 you wrote at 
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does NOT
 auto refresh.
 After which action VF should be updated? I create a VF, same
 condition, but when I change the color group of a message VF is
 updated.

 Can someone confirm?
 Not yet.






Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Marcus,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 10:38:13 AM, you wrote:




 On Monday, October 4, 2004, 11:50, Bill McCarthy wrote:

 OK, I've reported this before but this time I've done some more
 testing.  TB! is giving error messages - AV's - when mail is sent.
 Not always, but enough to annoy.

 The first thing I've done is to turn off the NAV checking of
 outgoing mail.

 What about outgoing filters (not that I've seen those AV's myself, but I
 guess it's relevant to track the problem down).

 POP3 or IMAP?

 Repeatable from all accounts or just one (if you have more then one)?

 Any folder related problems? Have you repaired and/or rebuilt you sent
 folder?




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: test - Please Ignore

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello shemming,

Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 2:49:21 PM, you wrote:







Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Bill,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 9:52:54 AM, you wrote:



 On Mon 4-Oct-04 4:50am -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:

 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem
 No Problem

 Darn, I got another when I sent out that last mail - another
 pair of 88's:

 Access violation at address 0088. Read of address 0088.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Testing and reporting

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello 9Val,

Monday, October 4, 2004, 9:00:13 AM, you wrote:



 Hello All, 

 Hmm,  after some recent messages in list and in PMs I want to ask only
 one   thing   from  beta-testers  -  *report*  bugs  you  encountered
 *immediately* and provide more information and observations. Because:

 1. It is quite surprizing to know, what bug persist, nobody reports it
 and it is like the dragon out of the blue when release time comes
 2.  Remember, that only providing more information and divide problems
 in small parts you significantly decrease bug-solve time.
 3.   Please,  no abstractions like that part doesn't work, it is not
 the bug anybody can resolve.

 Divide problems when it possible and we'll solve them part-by-part




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Greg,

Thursday, October 7, 2004, 1:30:44 AM, you wrote:



 Hello ,

 test




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Beer for every beta tester (Was: Re: The Bat! 3.01 RC3 is now available)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Boris,

Friday, October 1, 2004, 9:09:32 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Mary,

 Friday, October 1, 2004, 21:32 you wrote at 
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The Bat! 3.01 RC3 is now available

 I thought I'd test the new Wizards out - where are they hidden?

 They're gone! Tools drop-down menu is bare of them!

 Alexander K. said MaXxX should send a beer to each and every beta
 tester if they appeared in full release 3.01.

 Stand by for the party. :)
 But remember, you'll get only a cup of coffee :-) (JK).






Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Beer for every beta tester (Was: Re: The Bat! 3.01 RC3 is now available)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello MFAS,

Friday, October 1, 2004, 9:24:33 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Mary,

 Friday, October 1, 2004, 5:17:03 PM, you wrote:

MB Actually, I like coffee a bit better than beer! :party2:

 The second beer is better than any cup of coffee I've ever
 had!  Hey it's Friday.




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Coffee or Beer for every beta tester [was ... Beer for every beta tester]

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Dierk,

Saturday, October 2, 2004, 7:25:58 AM, you wrote:



 Hello Mary!

 On Friday, October 1, 2004 at 11:46:18 PM you wrote:

 Oh, what the heck, it's Friday! Just pour me a :batcoffee: and put a
 couple of tablespoons of Maker's Mark in it. :party:

 Why not make it some great Spanish Red, a fine glass of aged Rioja
 would suit me fine.








Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Coffee or Beer for every beta tester [was ... Beer for every beta tester]

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Mary,

Friday, October 1, 2004, 9:46:18 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Jim!

 On Friday, October 01, 2004, 4:24 PM, you wrote:

MB Actually, I like coffee a bit better than beer! :party2:

M The second beer is better than any cup of coffee I've ever
M had!  Hey it's Friday.

 Oh, what the heck, it's Friday! Just pour me a :batcoffee: and put a
 couple of tablespoons of Maker's Mark in it. :party:




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Beer for every beta tester (Was: Re: The Bat! 3.01 RC3 is now available)

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Mary,

Friday, October 1, 2004, 9:17:03 PM, you wrote:



 Hello Boris!

 On Friday, October 01, 2004, 4:09 PM, you wrote:

9Val The Bat! 3.01 RC3 is now available

  ... 

MB Alexander K. said MaXxX should send a beer to each and every beta
MB tester if [Wizards] appeared in full release 3.01. Stand by for
MB the party. :)

BA But remember, you'll get only a cup of coffee :-) (JK).

 Actually, I like coffee a bit better than beer! :party2:




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Coffee or Beer for every beta tester ...

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Mary,

Saturday, October 2, 2004, 11:36:11 AM, you wrote:



 Hello Dierk!

 On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 2:25 AM, you wrote:

MB Oh, what the heck, it's Friday! Just pour me a :batcoffee: and
MB put a couple of tablespoons of Maker's Mark in it. :party:

DH Why not make it some great Spanish Red, a fine glass of aged Rioja
DH would suit me fine.

 Oh, yes! Cancel the bourbon coffee. I'll have a glass of that great
 red wine instead, and is there a little cheese to go with? :party2:




Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT: Coffee or Beer for every beta tester [was ... Beer for every beta tester]

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Jurgen,

Saturday, October 2, 2004, 7:29:08 AM, you wrote:



 Hello Dierk,

 Saturday, October 2, 2004, 9:25:58 AM, you wrote:


 On Friday, October 1, 2004 at 11:46:18 PM you wrote:

 Oh, what the heck, it's Friday! Just pour me a :batcoffee: and put a
 couple of tablespoons of Maker's Mark in it. :party:

 Why not make it some great Spanish Red, a fine glass of aged Rioja
 would suit me fine.

 Yes, a Castello de Ygay wouldn't be bad!






Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

-- 
Best regards,
 Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


NFS: undo command does not function with dragdrop

2004-10-31 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello all,

- copy a filter with dragdrop (Alt + 'drag')
  for example: from 'Incomming mail' to 'Read messages'
- delete this new filter
- cancel the action
- an empty filter is generated

WinXP/SP1 - TB! v3.0.1.33/v3.0.2.4

can someone confirm? then I will open a bugtrack

-- 
best regards
Miroslav


BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Test

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
 !29/10/2004, 22:58:53: SEND  - Server reports error. The response
 is: 5.7.0 {mp011} Sender address does not belong to logged in user
 Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course

Apologies for this and other similar messages that have hit the list.

I've just opened TB on a spare machine here and discovered 80 identical
messages to the above in the outbox. Goodness knows how they got
there but they're now deleted.

-- 
Regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Aplologies to the list

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Um! Sorry for all the messages from me. I've just opened TB on a spare
machine here and, for some reason, all these messages were in the
draft and outbox folders. Because its a broadband/IMAP connection the
wretched things went.

I don't know how they got there in the first place but I've now
deleted all tbb  tbi files in all accounts as well as deleting the
contents of the folders on the server. Hope that sorts the problem.


-- 
Clive Taylor
2600 3.0.2.4 Rush
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: [3.0.2.3] The Bat Hangs When New Mail Is Manually Moved To A Folder

2004-10-31 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Simon Fincham  everyone else

31-Okt-2004 10:56, you wrote:

 Using: The Bat Version 3.0.2.3 Rush

The most recent beta is 3.0.2.4 - maybe you want to try with that version
first (I don't know if there's anything else but IMAP fixes from .3 to .4
but anyway...)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

Deliplayer2 is playing: We Interface by X-Dream
 from the 2004 album 'We Interface'



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS: undo command does not function with dragdrop

2004-10-31 Thread MAU
Hello Miroslav,

 - cancel the action

How do you cancel the action? There is no CANCEL button on the Sorting
Office.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4





 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS: undo command does not function with dragdrop

2004-10-31 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello MAU,

 How do you cancel the action? There is no CANCEL button on the Sorting
 Office.

'Ctrl' + 'Z'  or  Edit » Undo


--
best regards
Miroslav


BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS: undo command does not function with dragdrop

2004-10-31 Thread MAU
Hello Miroslav,

 How do you cancel the action? There is no CANCEL button on the Sorting
 Office.
 
 'Ctrl' + 'Z'  or  Edit » Undo

I must admit I had not realised Edit/Undo was available. I will have to
test it.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4





 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS: undo command does not function with dragdrop

2004-10-31 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello MAU,

 I must admit I had not realised Edit/Undo was available. I will have
 to test it.

I found a BT who describes a similar problem, please confirm here:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3807

-- 
best regards
Miroslav


BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS: Slow opening and adding filter conditions

2004-10-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas,

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:41:50 +0700 GMT (31/10/2004, 10:41 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:

MP Since the coming of NFS it takes ± 1 minute...  :-(

TF While your problem is not as sever as mine, I would consider a minute
TF unacceptable too. Let me create that BT entry, I'll post the URL here.

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4000

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody. - Bill Cosby

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Charlene,

  A reminder of what Charlene Ferrara typed on:
  30 October 2004 at 15:53:21 GMT +0200

CF IMHO there is absolutely no need for this feature.

 Totally disagree, In have a few programs here that give exactly that option
 and I for one would welcome it.

 What I don't like are programs that don't give the option at all, like
 Incredimail that minimises to tray whatever.


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 14:10 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Gunivortus,

  A reminder of what Gunivortus Goos typed on:
  30 October 2004 at 16:09:35 GMT +0200

GG Well, obviously there is, else I wouldn't have asked for it. :-)

 I think it's a good idea.

 And Oh look, the smiley quoted as well!


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 14:14 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Aplologies to the list

2004-10-31 Thread Ron Secord
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote,

 I don't know how they got there in the first place but I've now
 deleted all tbb  tbi files in all accounts as well as deleting the
 contents of the folders on the server. Hope that sorts the problem.

Looks like to me that you might have an auto-response filter set up
that you were testing and maybe forgot about? Just a guess, but every
single one of those messages has the exact same line from you.

-- 
Regards,
  Ron Secord
Flying with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Under Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
++
| Get Firefox - Rediscover the web!  |
| http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=0amp;t=1; |
++





 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Tony!

On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 8:14 AM, you wrote:

GG Well, obviously there is, else I wouldn't have asked for it. :-)

TB  I think it's a good idea.

As an option, I agree.

TB  And Oh look, the smiley quoted as well!

Did here, also! Hooray, all my problems may now be solved! If the
Edit/Undo choice in the Sorting Office turns out to be bug-free, that
is.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Aplologies to the list

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
 Looks like to me that you might have an auto-response filter set up
 that you were testing and maybe forgot about? Just a guess, but
 every single one of those messages has the exact same line from you.

There might have been in the past - but the odd thing is that I was
using TB on this machine last week without problems.

Anyway, I've expunged TB completely from the machine now and I'll just
use Thunderbird on it. That should do it!

-- 
Regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: alternate icon sets

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Dick,

  A reminder of what Dick H typed on:
  30 October 2004 at 17:28:57 GMT +0200

DH Don't understand the 'converted to bmp'. To my knowledge the file is already an
DH bmp file. You just need to copy it to your TB program directory and be sure
DH it's named 'glyphs.bmp'.

 Trouble with them is, they are the wrong size. I downloaded them,
 converted them but they don't display because the actual page size is
 wrong.

 Came into this thread with still over 100 mail to read so if it's been
 sorted ignore me, if not I'll get them working and post them up somewhere.


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 17:00 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tony Boom  everyone else

31-Okt-2004 15:11, you wrote:

 Incredimail

JEHOVA!!!

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: alternate icon sets

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Thomas,

  A reminder of what Thomas Martin typed on:
  30 October 2004 at 18:58:35 GMT +0200

TM But don't change that one you installed, because the ini file refers to a png file.
TM The old bmp glyph still work, but 99% are not updated for the NFS.

 What ini file? I can't find one.  Someone said it comes with an ini file
 but mine didn't.

 It would help if I could understand what's on the site but I can't read
 Klingon :)


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 18:06 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Alexander,

  A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz typed on:
  31 October 2004 at 18:35:01 GMT +0100

ASK JEHOVA!!!

 Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course :)


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 18:14 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: alternate icon sets

2004-10-31 Thread NetVicious
domingo, 31 oct 2004 at 19:08, it seems you wrote:

  What ini file? I can't find one.  Someone said it comes with an ini file
  but mine didn't.

3.x accept some advanced skining using a batskin.ini file

See this message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
  /\/ Using The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
 /  \  / \  / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1)
/\/ e t   \/ i c i o u s  Plugins: BayesIt! 0.7.4 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50
      Last 24 hour Spam% it's 58%
Moderator of Spanish TBUDL
Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat!







 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: alternate icon sets

2004-10-31 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Tony,

 It would help if I could understand what's on the site but I can't
 read Klingon :)

at present there are two different ways to integrate an external user
interface in TheBat! v3.

1. The author equipped the BMP file with the missing symbols for the NFS.

   In this case you do not need the INI file.
   The BATSKIN.INI may not be in the TheBat! directory!
   You can use this file also for version v1.x and v2.x

2. The author made a special glyph, which is integrated in TheBat! by
   the configuration file 'batskin.ini'.
   
   In this case you must copy both files *.PNG,*.BMP or *.JPG and the
   'batskin.ini' into the TheBat! directory.
   You need the version v3.x to integrate this glyph.

At present only 5-6 Glyphs are 100% compatible to the version v3.

You can find v3 compatible glyphs here:

» http://www.thebatworld.de/system/sections/index.php?op=viewarticleartid=128
» http://www.gaijin.at/tbglyphs.php
» http://bat-mail.de.vu/minimal.html
» http://bat-mail.de.vu/original.html


-- 
best regards
Miroslav


BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: alternate icon sets

2004-10-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Miroslav,

  A reminder of what Miroslav Florensen typed on:
  31 October 2004 at 20:12:35 GMT +0100

MFIn this case you must copy both files *.PNG,*.BMP or *.JPG and the
MF
MF'batskin.ini' into the TheBat! directory.
MFYou need the version v3.x to integrate this glyph.

 Now I sussed it, I was right clicking and saving the image, didn't dawn on
 me to download them in zip format. No instructions on the site of what to
 do, well, not in English anyway.

 Thank you anyway for the info but after looking at over 60 different glyph
 files I didn't see any that look half as good as V3's inbuilt set.

 And why is unbuilt a word and not inbuilt? I think that's a major bug in
 the British dictionary! Maybe not a bug but certainly an error. I found 9
 on line dictionary entries for inbuilt and only 3 for unbuilt.

 I've been a bricklayer working on building sites for over 25 years and
 never have I ever been asked to Unbuild something!

 Oooops, slight digression during the spell check, sorry :)


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
 _   
 The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush   31/10/2004 at 20:13 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Mary,

Sunday, October 31, 2004 
you let us know -at least in parts- :

 As an option, I agree.
Okay, as an option. Default factory setting must still
be the regular closing!

-- 
get happy
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:star:






 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: X

2004-10-31 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Charlene!

On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 2:59 PM, you wrote:

MB As an option, I agree.
CF Okay, as an option. Default factory setting must still
CF be the regular closing!

Yes. Default factory setting must still be: X in Main window closes
the application. Completely agree with you about this. We're on the
same page here. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: NFS Wrong Filtering

2004-10-31 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, at 08:31:42 [UTC+1100] (Sunday, October 31,
2004 22:31 my local time) Ian A. White wrote:


 When the Recipient or Sender is used in a filter, what is checked? Is
 it the header or part of the body as well. Also, if there is more than
 one possibility, which one is used? Is it the first match or the last
 match?

Similar bug (or feature?) and similar questions were added in thread
beginning from mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Additionally, it
may concerns last correction of bug described in
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3928.

-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
with BayesIt! 0.7.4)



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Odd filter and Unread folder problem

2004-10-31 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello tbbeta,

  I have noticed that I am having a problem in this version with
messages arriving in my inbox and then not all being filtered to the
proper folders. My situation is:

Password protected account, not opened. Virtual folder that looks at
this account for Unread messages. Mail is checked on startup and every
five minutes. Most of the messages are to these lists. They are then
filtered into a Bat folder.

As the messages are being downloaded the Unread folder flashes up 1
Unread then back to 0 presumably as they are filtered into the Bat
folder. Once all the messages are downloaded I noticed that there were
Unread messages still showing in the Virtual folder, (which I could
read)even though it is a password protected account. Upon opening the
account I see that there are some messages that should have been
filtered into the Bat folder still sitting in my Inbox. (Manual
re-filtering will filter them properly).

So there are two problems here.
1)I am able to read Unread messages in a Virtual folder that points to
a password protected account.
2) All the messages are not being filtered.

Anyone else seeing this in 3.0.2.4 .

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuart  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 55 shopping days left til Xmas.



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: stuck cc and BayesFilter

2004-10-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Roelof,

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:11:20 +0200GMT (30-10-2004, 13:11 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

RO   Finally I got BayesFilter catching spam, but whenever it catches
RO   something my CC gets stuck. I disabled BF and everything is running
RO   smooth again.
RO   Sounds familiar to anybody?
RO   Haven't tried yet whether this behavior can be reproduced with other
RO   versions than 3.0.2.2

RO Doesn't happen for the latest beta.

Unfortunately it does, it happened again. Had to kill TB four times
before I was able to solve the problem by deleting BayesFilter. I
guess I won't use it any more. Hundreds of duplicates.

I guess anti-spam plug-ins aren't for me.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

WINDOWS is to computing what Etch-a-Sketch is to art.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgph33G6pgcBv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

TBBETA Mission Statement

2004-10-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings Beta Listers,

This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you
of the primary purpose of this discussion list.

To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message.

Before  posting a question to the list, please check The Bat! User's
FAQ  at:  http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html  and  the list
archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
join the list, send a message to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


TBBETA Mission statement

The  TBBETA  list  has been set up for the purpose of discussing The
Bat!  officially released Beta test versions and related issues. For
general  topics  of  a  more  simple  nature  regarding full release
versions, refer to TBUDL. For more complex topics refer to TBTECH.

An  'officially  released'  beta  version  is  one  which  has  been
announced  *by  RITlabs*  on the TBBETA list, usually with a list of
changes.

Simply  send  messages  to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send it to
the whole list.

See  the  notes  at the end of this message for details about how to
manage your list membership or to leave the list.


It  would probably be a good idea for you to set up a folder to keep
TBBETA  messages  in.  If you do this, the next most useful thing to
have  in  place  is an automatic filter to move mail from your inbox
into your TBBETA folder.

Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for:

Header Field [Reply-To] Contains [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The Roguemoticon Project


It's  nice to see your contact's face in the header ... and for them
to  see  yours. That's what roguemoticons are all about. If you wish
to add yourself, then you'll need to visit this site
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat

What  this  place  will  do  for  you  is  to allow you to create an
account,  add  your  image  and  then  let  you download a .ZIP file
containing  all  the  files  you'll  need to be able so see people's
faces  without  having  to  send  or  receive any real images in any
messages.

To trigger the roguemoticon display in the message header for anyone
reading  your  message  using  TB,  you have the choice of using the
X-Rogue: header or a signature trigger.

  How to use a signature trigger
The  image  is  triggered  by  a 'Handle' you've defined in your
account,  and  when  that  Handle  appears  in a message it gets
replaced on the client side by the corresponding image. A handle
could  look  like anything you want it to look like pretty much.
For example:
:Leif_Gregory:
Just add this text to your standard message signature block.

  How to create the X-Rogue: header
You can do that with this macro:
%SetHeader('X-Rogue',':your_handle:')%-  in  your  templates for
this and other tb-lists.
However, the macro alone won't do the trick.
TB'll  say: 'Hey, that's not any RFC822 header I know about', so
you'll have to define it as such:
Options  ..  Preferences .. Messages .. Message headers .. 'Add'

Now you'll get a pop-up to define the header

  Display as: X-Rogue (or whatever, it isn't very important)
  RFC header: X-Rogue
  Uncheck: 'This field is an address list' (because it isn't)
  Check: 'Allow this field to be edited in the message editor'
  Uncheck:  'Display  this  field  in the scrollable part of the
  header pane'

Now you're done and every TB-user can see your lovable face when
they've installed the roguemoticons.

For you to see peoples faces:

  To get this going, you should be running TB! v2.12 or later. Fetch
  the following file:
  http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip

  Unzip it to the 'Images' directory that's in your TB! installation
  directory: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images
  You  should  now  have a directory called 'rogues' containing many
  images  as well as the file 'rogues.msl' in your Images directory.
  Go into the preferences, and bring up the View/Editor options. Now
  hit  Shift-CTRL-Alt-T  while  TB!  is in focus. This will re-fetch
  TB!'s smiley set from disk and load the new images.


TBOT - The Bat off topic discussion list

One of our members has created a list for those occasional off topic
discussions  of public interest. Please feel free to join this list,
where many of our readership currently participate.

Addresses:
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NFS: Slow opening and adding filter conditions

2004-10-31 Thread Nick Andriash
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, at 6:52:32 PM, Mark wrote:

 I have a filter with some 230 conditions. I did not have any problems
 opening/changing them with the OFS.

 Since the coming of NFS it takes ± 1 minute...

Excuse my ignorance, but what is NFS and OFS? I couldn't fine mention of
either in the Help File?



-- 
 -=Nick Andriash=-
  -=Creston, B.C. Canada=-
The Bat! Pro v3.0.2.4 Rush on Win XP Pro




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: [the_bat] Re: NFS: Slow opening and adding filter conditions

2004-10-31 Thread Michael Acklin
Sunday, October 31, 2004, 8:54:04 PM, (Internet Time - @162) you wrote:

Hello Nick,

 NA On Sunday, October 31, 2004, at 6:52:32 PM, Mark wrote:

 I have a filter with some 230 conditions. I did not have any problems
 opening/changing them with the OFS.

 Since the coming of NFS it takes ± 1 minute...

NA Excuse my ignorance, but what is NFS and OFS? I couldn't fine mention of
NA either in the Help File?


NFS = New File System
OFS = Old File System



-- 
Best regards,
 Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush
On Windows XP SP2



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading

2004-10-31 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.

I haven't posted for a while because it seemed that no one was
having the long pauses that I was experiencing with IMAP. Someone
(Allie, I think) suggested that they might be due to the large
number of messages I have on the server. This seemed strange to
me, since, with POP3, at least, users tend to rave about The
Bat's performance with large message bases.

Now, however, I can confirm others' reports of random long pauses
when downloading message bodies. Like Clive, this has
always been a problem for me. As I reported previously, I see
similar, but even longer pauses (sometimes) when moving between
folders. (TB! is set to not synchronize.)

Worse yet, I sometimes click on a message and get the wrong body!
I just displayed five unread messages in a folder. Of the five, I
was only able to read one. The other three all linked to the
wrong message.

These problems are so pervasive that, even though I finally broke
down and paid for the upgrade, I still use The Bat only for
testing new releases. I always end up going back to Thunderbird
and Mulberry.

I have also occasionally seen the behavior Martin reported of
random disconnects when moving between messages. I haven't
observed tasks getting stuck, but I'll be watching for this in
the future.

In addition, earlier today I had something VERY strange happen as
I was reading a thread from one of my Yahoo groups. I was getting
No message loaded for quite a few of the messages in the
thread. This is something I've seen quite a bit, but it had
always seemed to be random (and VERY frustrating).

However, I discovered that when I looked at the same
thread in Mulberry and Thunderbird, the problem messages were not
listed at all in the message list. As I looked further, I found
that I had two copies of every message. All were sent on October
19th. However, one copy of each, according to the Received column
in TB! and Mulberry, was received on the 19th and the other was
received on the 22nd. In each case, the copy received on the 19th
was a problem message, while the one received on the 22nd was
normal.

Even more strangely, in each case, the bad message is shown as
having been created/sent exactly two hours earlier than the good
one.

Any ideas on this one?

As I investigated this problem, I also discovered a couple of
interesting things I hadn't noticed before. First of all, I
cannot find the Received date and time (in the Received
column) anywhere in the message headers. Can anyone tell me where
this information comes from? Since it's identical in both TB! and
Mulberry, it must be in the message somewhere, but where?

I also (as an off-topic comment) noticed that Thunderbird does
not display all the Received: headers in the message, but only
the first and last. This strikes me as very strange, because of
the importance of these headers in tracking spam.

I also continue to be frustrated that TB! does not allow
threading on both references and subject. In my thread of six
good messages, when I thread by reference, four thread properly
and two do not, because they don't have reference headers. All
six thread properly in both Thunderbird and Mulberry.

Finally, I did something, and I'm not sure what, that caused even
this imperfect threading to break. Now, instead of being broken
into two threads, the twelve messages (good and bad) are now
displayed in seven threads! Anybody know what might have caused
this?

I'll be anxiously waiting to hear from the IMAP experts!  ;-) 

-- 
Keith Russell

...Scotty, beam us aboard. Aye, sir. Will a 2x4 do?

Using The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium IV 
with 512 MB.




 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading

2004-10-31 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, October 31, 2004 at 11:49:01 PM [GMT -0500], Keith Russell
wrote:

 I haven't posted for a while because it seemed that no one was having
 the long pauses that I was experiencing with IMAP. Someone (Allie, I
 think) suggested that they might be due to the large number of
 messages I have on the server. This seemed strange to me, since, with
 POP3, at least, users tend to rave about The Bat's performance with
 large message bases.

  IMAP is different from POP3. With POP3, you're working with a message
  base stored locally. With IMAP, your message bases are stored on the
  server. You keep syncing them with a local cache representation that
  needs updating to reflect what's currently on the server. Syncing a
  large message base takes longer than syncing a small message base.

 Now, however, I can confirm others' reports of random long pauses when
 downloading message bodies. Like Clive, this has always been a problem
 for me. As I reported previously, I see similar, but even longer
 pauses (sometimes) when moving between folders. (TB! is set to not
 synchronize.)

  OK.

 Worse yet, I sometimes click on a message and get the wrong body!  I
 just displayed five unread messages in a folder. Of the five, I was
 only able to read one. The other three all linked to the wrong
 message.

Now that's really odd. I don't really have an explanation for such
behaviour. 

 These problems are so pervasive that, even though I finally broke down
 and paid for the upgrade, I still use The Bat only for testing new
 releases. I always end up going back to Thunderbird and Mulberry.

I have problems with Mulberry. You're having problems with TB!. IMAP
needs good client/server compatibility to work well. You may find that
your client of choice depends on how well it works with your IMAP
server. MDaemon, my own IMAP server is more TB! than Mulberry friendly. 
Lucky me. 

 In addition, earlier today I had something VERY strange happen as I
 was reading a thread from one of my Yahoo groups. I was getting No
 message loaded for quite a few of the messages in the thread. This is
 something I've seen quite a bit, but it had always seemed to be random
 (and VERY frustrating).

Quite often, the 'no message loaded' is associated with TB! being quite
busy at working with its queue of tasks. You then have to wait for
those tasks to complete. Unlike Mulberry and ThunderBird, TB! works via
a single connection to the server. One of TB!'s future development plans
is support for multiple connections to the server. 

 However, I discovered that when I looked at the same thread in
 Mulberry and Thunderbird, the problem messages were not listed at all
 in the message list. As I looked further, I found that I had two
 copies of every message. All were sent on October 19th. However, one
 copy of each, according to the Received column in TB! and Mulberry,
 was received on the 19th and the other was received on the 22nd. In
 each case, the copy received on the 19th was a problem message, while
 the one received on the 22nd was normal.

Did you try deleting your local cache for that folder/mailbox?

 As I investigated this problem, I also discovered a couple of
 interesting things I hadn't noticed before. First of all, I cannot
 find the Received date and time (in the Received column) anywhere
 in the message headers. Can anyone tell me where this information
 comes from? Since it's identical in both TB! and Mulberry, it must be
 in the message somewhere, but where?

The received time in the TB! received column is the time the message was
received by TB! and not the server. You'll therefore not see that time
in the message header.

 I also (as an off-topic comment) noticed that Thunderbird does not
 display all the Received: headers in the message, but only the first
 and last. This strikes me as very strange, because of the importance
 of these headers in tracking spam.

ThunderBird doesn't do a lot of things that we take for granted with
TB!. 

 I also continue to be frustrated that TB! does not allow threading on
 both references and subject. In my thread of six good messages, when I
 thread by reference, four thread properly and two do not, because they
 don't have reference headers. All six thread properly in both
 Thunderbird and Mulberry.

Yes. I don't know when TB! will start threading using both subject and
references.

 Finally, I did something, and I'm not sure what, that caused even this
 imperfect threading to break. Now, instead of being broken into two
 threads, the twelve messages (good and bad) are now displayed in seven
 threads! Anybody know what might have caused this?

I pass on that. It's not like the messages changed, so the only
explanation would be a change of the sorting.

-- 
-= Allie =-
. Daddy, what does FORMATTING DRIVE C: mean?
__
Using The Bat!™ v3.0.2.2 Rush for IMAP mail
IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)






Re: Odd filter and Unread folder problem

2004-10-31 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Stuart Cuddy  everyone else

31-Okt-2004 23:03, you wrote:

 Anyone else seeing this in 3.0.2.4 .

Yes, I've seen similar in 3.0.2.2 and 3.0.2.4 - but it happened only once
in each version and I could not track down what might have happened.

However, I can confirm that it happens with a VF - mine showed a message
that did not match its filtering criteria at all, from a folder that was
not even watched by the VF. Refreshing the VF did not help. It hasn't
happened again ever since so I can't describe any better.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

Shirley's Law: Most people deserve each other.



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading

2004-10-31 Thread Clive Taylor
Rather than echo all of what Allie has said in his reply I can confirm
that (unlike Allie) I can't rely on TB for everyday, real-world IMAP
use. It's just so frustrating to wait for a couple of minutes for
messages to display while TB churns away. I can see my router working
so it's not a matter of the prog hanging. I've now taken to closing
and reopening TB at intervals and making a cup of coffee while it
loads and sorts out its message base. Not good.

OTOH, Mulberry doesn't exhibit any of the IMAP issues here that TB does -
and that's probably because it was designed primarily as an IMAP,
rather than POP, client. With TB it's the other way round of course.
Allie has the opposite experience, so resolving IMAP problems is
probably going to be a compromise.

I experience duplicate messages, too, on a regular basis. My largest
message bases are around 2,000 messages (TB groups) but I experience
these hangs even on an account with just a few hundred messages. No
combination of synchronisation or cache deletion really helps.

-- 
Regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading

2004-10-31 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, Allie.
I thought I had sent this off an hour ago, and I just discovered
SEVENTEEN copies in my Outbox! How did that happen?!!!
And after trying again to post using TB!, I now have two more. 
:-( One has an icon in the second column; the second doesn't. 
(What is that, anyway?) As a result, this reply will be sent 
using Mulberry.

On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 9:56:09 PM, you wrote:
On Sunday, October 31, 2004 at 11:49:01 PM [GMT -0500], Keith 
Russell
wrote:

Someone (Allie, I
think) suggested that they might be due to the large number of
messages I have on the server. This seemed strange to me, 
since, with
POP3, at least, users tend to rave about The Bat's 
performance with
large message bases.

  IMAP is different from POP3. With POP3, you're working with 
a message
  base stored locally. With IMAP, your message bases are 
stored on the
  server. You keep syncing them with a local cache 
representation that
  needs updating to reflect what's currently on the server. 
Syncing a
  large message base takes longer than syncing a small message 
base.
Of course. I meant to mention that, but forgot. I understand that
performance will not be as good with IMAP as with POP3. The point
I was trying to make, though, was that I would hope that TB!'s
IMAP performance would compare as favorably to other clients as
does its POP3 performance. However, where Mulberry and
Thunderbird seem to be little affected by the volume of my
messages, it does appear that The Bat! is.
Worse yet, I sometimes click on a message and get the wrong 
body!  I
just displayed five unread messages in a folder. Of the five, 
I was
only able to read one. The other three all linked to the wrong
message.

Now that's really odd. I don't really have an explanation for 
such
behaviour.
So obviously, you haven't seen this. Has anyone else?
I have problems with Mulberry. You're having problems with 
TB!. IMAP
needs good client/server compatibility to work well. You may 
find that
your client of choice depends on how well it works with your 
IMAP
server. MDaemon, my own IMAP server is more TB! than Mulberry 
friendly.
Lucky me.
Good point. I hadn't thought of server/client compatibility. This
means that if I change IMAP providers, as I may do in a few
weeks, I could find the situation reversed. Interesting.
In addition, earlier today I had something VERY strange 
happen as I
was reading a thread from one of my Yahoo groups. I was 
getting No
message loaded for quite a few of the messages in the 
thread. This is
something I've seen quite a bit, but it had always seemed to 
be random
(and VERY frustrating).

Quite often, the 'no message loaded' is associated with TB! 
being quite
busy at working with its queue of tasks. You then have to wait 
for
those tasks to complete. Unlike Mulberry and ThunderBird, TB! 
works via
a single connection to the server. One of TB!'s future 
development plans
is support for multiple connections to the server.
Yes, but of course Mulberry's big problem is lack of
multithreading
I did some experimenting tonight and found that reloading the
message often displays the body. Is there a keystroke for that,
so I don't have to navigate the menu every time?
However, I discovered that when I looked at the same thread in
Mulberry and Thunderbird, the problem messages were not 
listed at all
in the message list. As I looked further, I found that I had 
two
copies of every message. All were sent on October 19th. 
However, one
copy of each, according to the Received column in TB! and 
Mulberry,
was received on the 19th and the other was received on the 
22nd. In
each case, the copy received on the 19th was a problem 
message, while
the one received on the 22nd was normal.

Did you try deleting your local cache for that folder/mailbox?
No, because I couldn't remember how. Can you remind me?
I found a couple of messages in my Inbox folder tonight that
exhibited the same behavior. Again, those with a received date
corresponding to the sent date cannot be read. Copies of the same
messages received on the 22nd are fine!
I cannot
find the Received date and time (in the Received column) 
anywhere
in the message headers. Can anyone tell me where this 
information
comes from? Since it's identical in both TB! and Mulberry, it 
must be
in the message somewhere, but where?

The received time in the TB! received column is the time the 
message was
received by TB! and not the server. You'll therefore not see 
that time
in the message header.
I thought at first that this was the case, but the fact that the
dates were identical for TB! and Mulberry threw me off, I guess.
I'm guessing that I probably used Thunderbird for three days
before I got around to checking out TB! and Mulberry again on the
22nd. I must have started them up at the same time so that the
received date and times would correspond.
I haven't been able to find the date Thunderbird received these
messages, because the Date column seems to mean the sent date,
and I don't know