Re: vCard

[OK3]

Hello, the Bat! list recipients,

Wednesday, March 14, 2001, Dierk Haasis wrote to TBUDL The Bat! Mailinglist about
vCard:

DH>   Can  it  be that some greedy prog from some greedy software firm
DH>   has stolen the association?

Yes,  it  can.  I have an icon supplied by Lotus Organizer for vCards.
Try  to  remember which soft did you install lately that could replace
association of vCard files.


-- 
Best regards,
Oleg Zalyalov. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Using The Bat! version 1.51
  under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: auto check - mailto crash - verify & decrypt ?

[Nick Andriash]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On March 13, 2001, at 4:01:39 PM, Tom Wrote:

> 1) The Bat don't automatically (periodically) check my mails any more
> ! It already happened two times before with v1.49 and I reinstalled it
> and it worked fine. Now it really don't work any more !

Have you verified that you have that option checked in
Account/Properties/Options? If you do a manual check, does it work?

> 2) When in any browser I click on a mailto: link, I got a kernel32
> error and a crash. Previously it worked fine and it seems that happen
> since I've installed Opera.

Not surprising. ;o)  The problem is originating with your Browswer
configurations, and not TB!  Opera in infamous for this kind of behaviour,
or at least that was my short lived experience with the Browser.
Seriously, I don't know what to suggest, other than examining your MailTo:
file associations in Windows Explorer/View/Folder Options.

> 3) In the Bat help, it is explained that when using "verify signature"
> on an encrypted e-mail, it decrypts it automatically. But in fact, it
> only checks the signature ! Is the bug in the program or in the help
> file.

I think you will find that TB! has in fact decrypted the message... it
would have to in order to verify the signature. What TB! does is create a
new decrypted message with the same subject, so take a look next time you
"Verify" that PGP encrypted message for that newly created decrypted
message.


Nick

  _
 -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
[ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10  A ] 
  [ GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]  
  __

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.60
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iD8DBQE6rwZexQKEdHuj/c4RAiwhAKCSZggIfgJRcNPyqwtVD32JBxj5hACgsCIG
KJqUpd20t5g48YcVZkRzRkc=
=P5fo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: auto check - mailto crash - verify & decrypt ?

[Thomas]

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 01:01:39 +0100GMT (14/03/2001, 08:01 +0800GMT),
Tom wrote:

T> 1) The Bat don't automatically (periodically) check my mails any more
T> ! It already happened two times before with v1.49 and I reinstalled it
T> and it worked fine. Now it really don't work any more !

I heard this probelm before, and TB worked fine either after a
complete reinstall of TB (which you have tried), or of Windows. The
reasons seems to bne a currption of the registry.

T> 2) When in any browser I click on a mailto: link, I got a kernel32
T> error and a crash. Previously it worked fine and it seems that happen
T> since I've installed Opera.

Again, makes me suspect your registry is beyhond hope. :-(

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.51
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

auto check - mailto crash - verify & decrypt ?

[Tom]

Hi,

I'm experiencing many problems with the bat 1.51 :

1) The Bat don't automatically (periodically) check my mails any more
! It already happened two times before with v1.49 and I reinstalled it
and it worked fine. Now it really don't work any more !

2) When in any browser I click on a mailto: link, I got a kernel32
error and a crash. Previously it worked fine and it seems that happen
since I've installed Opera.

3) In the Bat help, it is explained that when using "verify signature"
on an encrypted e-mail, it decrypts it automatically. But in fact, it
only checks the signature ! Is the bug in the program or in the help
file.


(win 98)

Any idea ?
Thanks in advance for your help

-- 
 Tom



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: How to NOT get messages for an account?

[Dave Gorman]

Hello ztrader,

Tuesday, March 13, 2001, 4:38:50 PM, you wrote:

z> Question: how can I set TBat to NOT get mail for an account when
z> alt-f2 is pressed?

In Account Properties go to Options and check "Ignore 'Check all accounts'
Request".  That seems to do the trick for me.

-- 
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381
Service Pack 6



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: replying to multiple mails in one reply?

[Brian Clark]

[carbon copied to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Hi André,

@ 9:26:58 AM on 3/13/2001, André Engelhardt wrote:

> I was wondering if it's also possible to reply to a bunch of
> messages at once. Like when you get 4 msgs from one person, that you
> can reply to all those messages in one reply message? (without using
> copy and paste of course :-)

> That would be too cool!

Very much so; I agree.

Sorry for the "me too," moderators.

--
 Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer
 PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
 [TB! 1.52 Beta/1, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A]



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

How to NOT get messages for an account?

[ztrader]

I have a number of accounts that I get with alt-f2, but some are
'fake' accounts that can send mail OK but are unable to get mail.
Older versions of TBat ignored the 'get', and timed out, and alt-f2
got all the mail without intervention.

The new version presumably wants to update the fake accounts with a
password, since it can't connect. Trouble is, a message box requiring
a response comes up and needs a response to go away.

Question: how can I set TBat to NOT get mail for an account when
alt-f2 is pressed?

Thanks,

ztrader

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

Hi Käö§,

On 13 March 2001 at  03:34:48 +1000 (which was 17:34 where I  live)
Käö§ wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:

K> Well Marck I knew this would happen, and although the basic problem
K> has not been solved, some basic education certainly has, and I
K> thank you.

My pleasure - anything to help :-).



K send, try switching ports from 25 to 26 for the SMTP server. This
K is because they block port 25 for third party servers.

MDP>> (Interesting!).

K> Which? Switching from Port 25 to 26 or the blocking of third
K> parties? And if you don't mind me asking why? (Now that you have me
K> interested).

Just that they offer SMTP support on port 26 as well as on port 25. To
me that seems unusual. It might not be. I run my own SMTP *and* POP3
server in-house - despite the dial-up status. I can achieve this
because I do have un-metered access and can stomach the retries. I
like to run my own servers because I like to know the fate of my
outbound messages and I do have my own domain to take care of.

MDP>> Okay - there's a terminological mistake in this para ...

K> My mistake yes POP3 not POP, type lazyness :(

The mistake I was referring to was the blurring of the line between
incoming and outgoing protocols. You were inferring that you were
using POP for outgoing mail. I described the protocols to make it
clear that SMTP was for outbound and POP for inbound. I wasn't worried
about the missing '3' - it's a valid shorthand.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH 
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: vCard

[Shahar]

On Tuesday, March 13, 2001, at 22:00:10, Dierk wrote to Shahar about:
vCard


> the nice little icon for an
>   attached vCard has been gone.

Works fine here ...



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

vCard

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello TBUDL Members!

  Is anything wrong on my system or do others have the same prob:

  Since using TB! 1.51 (or 1.52 Beta/1?) the nice little icon for an
  attached vCard has been gone.

  Can it be that some greedy prog from some greedy software firm has
  stolen the association?


- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/1

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Sooner or later the graveyards are full of everybody. (Terry
Pratchett)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy:  The core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOq5uR/To1oA8g8dLEQLtywCg9U2NMmLeT5CT9YHY1OT1Lf8Z3vIAoJi8
uRoC4WG8IMSv7sUbLxV0sVDV
=ta3R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Käö§]

Well Marck I knew this would happen, and although the basic problem
has not been solved, some basic education certainly has, and I thank
you.

The problem has been solved by using my ISP's SMTP server as you
described, I had no idea that could be done, I dunno how I missed
that, been usin email for a few years and never came across it before,
is it something that I should have known?
Don't know weather to feel like a gooseor a Bat!

Absolutely INVALUABLE group of people here, all of you.

Wednesday, March 14, 2001, you wrote:
MDP> In case you didn't find this in TB, it's in Account Properties ..
MDP> Transport .. SMTP Server .. Authentication .. Use "POP before SMTP
MDP> authentication".

Yup, it has always worked without this, but I had also checked this
box to no avail.

K>>> If you're already doing this, you might have an ISP conflict. If
K>>> you've used for instance Earthlink, AOL or MSN while trying to
K>>> send, try switching ports from 25 to 26 for the SMTP server. This
K>>> is because they block port 25 for third party servers.

MDP> (Interesting!).

Which? Switching from Port 25 to 26 or the blocking of third parties?
And if you don't mind me asking why? (Now that you have me
interested).

MDP> So, let me get this straight: Runbox provide you with POP and SMTP
MDP> services while your ISP provides you with a PPP VPOP to access the
MDP> other services.

Well the reason that I use a mail-host instead of my ISP is that the
mail-server they have is unreliable at times, and only takes 5Mb. This
is no good to me because if I'm away workin' for a few days and come
back the thing has filled.

MDP> Okay - there's a terminological mistake in this para which might
MDP> indicate some of the problem (or it might just be a typing slip). POP3
MDP> is the Post Office Protocol (v3), used to collect incoming mail for a
MDP> user. You will collect your incoming messages from the RunBox POP3
MDP> servers using this protocol. SMTP is the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
MDP> used to route outbound messages.

My mistake yes POP3 not POP, type lazyness :(

MDP> Does your main ISP have an SMTP server? If RunBox have messed up the
MDP> configuration of their SMTP server (which is what it seems to me has
MDP> happened here), can't you use your ISP's SMTP server instead? It
MDP> doesn't matter which server you use as long as you have authorization
MDP> to do so. You don't have to use RunBox's SMTP server for outbound
MDP> traffic just because you want your inbound messages to come through
MDP> that route.

Wow, I can't get over that, never knew it.

MDP> Well, see if there are any shreds of aid in the above.

Yeah well you can throw me some "shreds" anytime.


MDP> - --
MDP> Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
MDP>  

Thank you again Marck,
and Thomas,
and cheers to you all.
   ~Käö§~¢æ«z˛±ÊâmçZ±ªÜ†+ލ¦è®

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Thomas]

Hallo Marck,

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:37:03 + GMT (14/03/2001, 00:37 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:

MDP> Another is to download and install a local SMTP daemon to take the
MDP> routing responsibility away from the ISP ... but that presupposes a
MDP> certain level of expertise to configure and maintain one.

I did that. It tries to send, the recipient's POP server might be not
reachable. It tries again after a period of time... Well, worth it
only for people who are online 24/7. Definitely not for dial-in
customers. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thomas,

On 13 March 2001 at  00:22:51 +0800 (which was 16:22 where I  live)
Thomas wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone on TBUDL and made these points:

MDP>> Does your main ISP have an SMTP server? If RunBox have messed up the
MDP>> configuration of their SMTP server (which is what it seems to me has
MDP>> happened here), can't you use your ISP's SMTP server instead?

T> I don't know Runbox, but this certainly depends on the ISP. Over here,
T> I use the Hinet SMTP Server for all of my accounts, as long as I log
T> into the Internet via Hinet.net .

T> When I visit my mother, her ISP ("Hamburg.de") wouldn't let me use
T> their SMTP Server unless my From and Reply-to addresses are
T> @Hamburg.de . So it clearly depends on the ISP's policy.

Very true, but it is a possibility worth exploring in this case.
Another is to download and install a local SMTP daemon to take the
routing responsibility away from the ISP ... but that presupposes a
certain level of expertise to configure and maintain one.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04)
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOq5MrznkJKuSnc2gEQI5BACdFFHYJ4c0cAi5sUugyAFGJHII5UQAoMKg
jW9qm3xt3DbOgrYZ+UwJ9U8Q
=vLBy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Thomas]

Hallo Marck,

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:04:22 + GMT (14/03/2001, 00:04 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:

MDP> Does your main ISP have an SMTP server? If RunBox have messed up the
MDP> configuration of their SMTP server (which is what it seems to me has
MDP> happened here), can't you use your ISP's SMTP server instead?

I don't know Runbox, but this certainly depends on the ISP. Over here,
I use the Hinet SMTP Server for all of my accounts, as long as I log
into the Internet via Hinet.net .

When I visit my mother, her ISP ("Hamburg.de") wouldn't let me use
their SMTP Server unless my From and Reply-to addresses are
@Hamburg.de . So it clearly depends on the ISP's policy.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Marck D. Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Aaron,

On 13 March 2001 at  01:31:41 +1000 (which was 15:31 where I  live)
Käö§ wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:

K> Got a prob here which is causing some grief,

You have, haven't you!



K>> ... you should check the option box for "My outgoing server
K>> requires authentication".

In case you didn't find this in TB, it's in Account Properties ..
Transport .. SMTP Server .. Authentication .. Use "POP before SMTP
authentication".

K>> If you're already doing this, you might have an ISP conflict. If
K>> you've used for instance Earthlink, AOL or MSN while trying to
K>> send, try switching ports from 25 to 26 for the SMTP server. This
K>> is because they block port 25 for third party servers.

(Interesting!).



K>>   Okay, so it still will not send anything, anywhere, no matter
K>> what?  Hmm... Would you consider trying another email client, just
K>> to test  if that works?

Huh! They clearly don't understand how hard that is for a TB user!!


K>> Also, did we establish which ISP you use (even though port 26
K>> didn't work, either)?

So, let me get this straight: Runbox provide you with POP and SMTP
services while your ISP provides you with a PPP VPOP to access the
other services.

K> And this is where I am at now, I have not responded yet to this last
K> mail, thought I might bounce it off you people and see what you make
K> of it.

K> As far as their last question about the ISP, well no I haven't
K> hassled them about it at all, at this stage I am reckoning that it
K> is not an ISP problem, I base this on the fact that all other
K> accounts are sending and recieving POP mail just fine.

Okay - there's a terminological mistake in this para which might
indicate some of the problem (or it might just be a typing slip). POP3
is the Post Office Protocol (v3), used to collect incoming mail for a
user. You will collect your incoming messages from the RunBox POP3
servers using this protocol. SMTP is the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
used to route outbound messages.

Does your main ISP have an SMTP server? If RunBox have messed up the
configuration of their SMTP server (which is what it seems to me has
happened here), can't you use your ISP's SMTP server instead? It
doesn't matter which server you use as long as you have authorization
to do so. You don't have to use RunBox's SMTP server for outbound
traffic just because you want your inbound messages to come through
that route.

K> I don't want to install another mail-client if I can help it, even
K> for a test... Could not be TB! at fault here could it???

Not overnight, no.

K> And I don't want to stop using Runbox, I really like the 100Mb
K> limit, it suits me when I have to go away for days and the total
K> mail from lists grows into the thousands...

Like I say, that's inbound. The problem is with outbound. You're not
bound (groan) to use RunBox for outbound mail.

K> (not mentioning any names of course, heheh).

K> Should also add that I have tried every option/combination on the
K> "Transport" Tab within TB!.

I'll bet!

K> Hope this info is not too much or too little for anyone to work from,
K> and that I have formatted in a legible way for ya'll.
K> I got an idea someone here will see this and know exactly what's
K> happening, and how to save my Bat!
K> And if you do you shall immediately assume a status not unlike a God...

Well, see if there are any shreds of aid in the above.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04)
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOq5FBznkJKuSnc2gEQKTDQCg7+xEiu8IM5THviubj5iimy7Zp4oAoPvx
NYfcrZmjcGPHsexJg8BIG33m
=kPGF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Thomas]

Hallo Käö§,

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 01:31:41 +1000 GMT (13/03/2001, 23:31 +0800 GMT),
Käö§ wrote:

K> Could not be TB! at fault here could it???

Try Account / Properties / Transport / Click the Authentication button
behind the SMTP Server details  / [ ] Use POP before SMTP. Check it.

K> And if you do you shall immediately assume a status not unlike a God...

If that one works, I'll hold you to it. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

What happens if you get scared half to death twice?

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Update the macro %TIMELONG

[Shahar]

On Tuesday, March 13, 2001, at 16:39:20, Thomas wrote to Shahar about:
Update the macro %TIMELONG


S>> I wonder if I can update the macro so it'll show me the correct time
S>> even after 20 minutes of editing a message.

> Unfortunately not; the macros are little variables, if you so want,
> that insert their value as a text string in the mail the moment you
> open it (for example by hitting reply). After that, they cannot be
> newly "refreshed".

> Workaround: use this macro in a Quick Template which you only call
> manually when you are finished editing the message.

Thank you. I'll try it.



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

runbox.com versus TheBat!

[Käö§]

Hello people,

Got a prob here which is causing some grief,
a few weeks ago I started using "runbox.com" as my mail host, in fact
I got two seperate accounts with them.

All was well up to yesterday, when suddenly BOTH accounts stopped
sending mail, I send a post, I get "logging onto server" then "sending
message header" then immediately "logging off server".
Looks ok but the message isn't sent,
on viewing the log-file I get (example):

!14/03/2001, 00:35:42: SEND  - Message has not been sent. Server reply - relaying to 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator

Bear in mind this happens no matter what addy I am sending to.
So after being patient for many hours I start pokin' with settings and
things trying to find the problem, eventually I mail Runbox, after
relating the problem to them much as I have done here I get this
reply (and promply I might add):
---
 You are using POP and SMTP, I gather?
 There are several possible reasons for the errors you get. Firstly,
 you need to check for mail in your Runbox account before trying to
 send (in order to authenticate yourself to the POP and thus also to
 the SMTP server). In for example Outlook, you should check the option
 box for "My outgoing server requires authentication". If you're
 already doing this, you might have an ISP conflict. If you've used for
 instance Earthlink, AOL or MSN while trying to send, try switching
 ports from 25 to 26 for the SMTP server. This is because they block
 port 25 for third party servers.
 Regards,
 Runbox support
---

OK? So I tried these tricks and they failed, I mail them back and tell
them, I also tell them it was ok up to yesterday,they reply again
within an hour:
---
 Alright, if it used to work up until today, I think you can be sure
 that it is temporary. Also, try clicking send multiple times, that
 often does the trick!
  Regards,
 RB Support
---

Still with me? Well after another 12Hrs I consider that it should be
out of the "Temporary" window.
I mail back again, pointing out the fact that I can send mail to them
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but nowhere else. Also that I am on a mail-list
where there are other users of Runbox that are not having this problem
at all.
Promtly again they reply:
---
 Hi again,
  Okay, so it still will not send anything, anywhere, no matter what?
 Hmm... Would you consider trying another email client, just to test
 if that works? Also, did we establish which ISP you use (even though
 port 26 didn't work, either)?
 Regards,
 RB Support
---

And this is where I am at now, I have not responded yet to this last
mail, thought I might bounce it off you people and see what you make
of it.
As far as their last question about the ISP, well no I haven't hassled
them about it at all, at this stage I am reckoning that it is not an
ISP problem, I base this on the fact that all other accounts are
sending and recieving POP mail just fine.

I don't want to install another mail-client if I can help it, even for
a test...
Could not be TB! at fault here could it???

And I don't want to stop using Runbox, I really like the 100Mb limit,
it suits me when I have to go away for days and the total mail from
lists grows into the thousands...
(not mentioning any names of course, heheh).

Should also add that I have tried every option/combination on the
"Transport" Tab within TB!.

Hope this info is not too much or too little for anyone to work from,
and that I have formatted in a legible way for ya'll.
I got an idea someone here will see this and know exactly what's
happening, and how to save my Bat!
And if you do you shall immediately assume a status not unlike a God...

Keep flappin',
~Käö§~(¹ªÞ²æìr¸›yÖ¬j·!Š÷£iº+

Re: Mailto Changed with Upgrades

[Thomas]

Hallo Mike,

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:44:07 -0500 GMT (13/03/2001, 06:44 +0800 GMT),
Mike Yetto wrote:

MY> I won't go to NS 5.

Hardly. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Update the macro %TIMELONG

[Thomas]

Hallo Shahar,

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:04:53 +0200 GMT (12/03/2001, 22:04 +0800 GMT),
Shahar wrote:

S> I wonder if I can update the macro so it'll show me the correct time
S> even after 20 minutes of editing a message.

Unfortunately not; the macros are little variables, if you so want,
that insert their value as a text string in the mail the moment you
open it (for example by hitting reply). After that, they cannot be
newly "refreshed".

Workaround: use this macro in a Quick Template which you only call
manually when you are finished editing the message.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

To succeed in politics, it is often necessary to rise above your principles. 

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

replying to multiple mails in one reply?

[André Engelhardt]

Hi TBUDL,

  I was wondering if it's also possible to reply to a bunch of
  messages at once. Like when you get 4 msgs from one person, that you
  can reply to all those messages in one reply message? (without using
  copy and paste of course :-)

  That would be too cool!

-- 
Best regards and have a nice day,
 André

/---\
|Eternal Tedium Sound & Media Design|
|http://www.eternaltedium.com   |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|GSM: +49 162 751 8530 (sms capable)|
|PGP Key ID: 0x927EF264 |
\---/

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org