Re: ISO settings

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Peter,

On Thursday, February 7, 2002 at 9:34:22 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):

PH  you used the ISO-8859-15 encoding for your message.

PM did I? I didn't change anything, but I'm using a beta version of TB!.
PM Maybe it sets this as default. My normal setting is ISO-8859-1. I'll
PM check on this later.

Dave Conroy's mail you answered to was in 'us-ascii', so The Bat! used
it for your answer. In your status bar there should have been written
'none' (check it our by opening again an answer mail to Dave's).

As soon as you used the accent TB! recognized it can't sent the mail
with 'us-ascii' and for what ever reason it changed the charset to
Latin-9.
Setting manually to 'Latin-1' before sending should solve the problem
until a more sophisticated solution is found :-)
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Think twice before you think.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Gerard de Vries

 
ON Thursday, February 07, 2002, 9:37:00 PM, you wrote:

Dierk I never had the inclination to do this, but ... try to open it with a
Dierk normal text editor like TextPad, it opens everything. If it is
Dierk not readable you can try a HEX editor.

Hi Dierk,
Tried that, that's why I know it's a Microsoft attachment, but it is
near impossible to figure out what's in it.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard  

Insert Cookie Here-- % of all statistics are wrong. - Statistics Canada 1985 -

Windows 2000 Professional with TB Version 1.53t 



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Gerard,

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 10:08:14 AM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):

 
GdV btw your sig cutoff mark is incorrect.

No, his message was PGP-sigend, and this prepends the '- ' before
signature mark to avoid probable misbehaviors by PGP-en/de-crypt
routines.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

No man is an island, but some of us are long peninsulas.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Multiple instances or at least a suggestion?

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jonathan,

On 08 February 2002 at 23:49:27 -0500 (which was 04:49 where I live)
Jonathan Wayne wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 (Sorry for my frequent TB Help file gripe - my MAIN beef with TB - but the
 network and admin help is worthless. I don't want a networking course; I want
 context sensitive information on how groups works, for example. It certainly
 isn't intuitive. I would hope that the TB creators at least monitor some of
 these very common problems and sources of confusion and address them with Help
 rewrite. End of soapbox.)

There was a major Help update last summer. It was improved and added
to by around 150%. Some topics were not covered in the upgrade
however. Granted that the help is incomplete and more could be done.

Frankly, groups under Network  Administration are something of a
black hole in terms of operability and knowledge. I can't work out
what they're for and how they work. If anyone has any insights -
please fill me in and I'll update the Help with the new information.

I've suggested their use to Rick and have just spent half an hour
trying to work out what they do and how they work. From what I can
see, they do nothing, add nothing and don't work at all as expected.
Right now they look to me like an un-implemented vestige of an idea.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - Brain extension - see http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y6sIOeQkq5KdzaARAot5AKCFYLbBOjgQZqVsHvzLlKgZvLpSjgCdEqwW
DSd6diTXCq6b8ct0LZNYho8=
=/IyO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Gerard,

On 08 February 2002 at 10:08:14 +0100 (which was 09:08 where I live)
Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the suggestion, but apparently it doesn't work under
W2K. I will search the Net for an other proggie.

Having re-visited the site, I see your confusion. It's an old program
and when the author says Windows 95 he really means Win 32. It
works on all 32 bit versions of windows... and it *does* work.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - Brain extension - see http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y7M/OeQkq5KdzaARAja7AJ0RlPLT2mUEj2j4JJi8VLOhnnMmogCgqA0D
nZw9vyKi9JSurMFU0BCuY/s=
=5/wK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Markus Gloede

Hi,

ATT attachments might also be plain text attachments. You get these when
you requested a read receipt. fentun only works with DAT attachments,
AFAIK.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 6 


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: threading (or really, unthreading) a folder??

2002-02-08 Thread Dave Goodman


Melissa Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes - it's one of the things I really appreciate about TB!'s threading
 options.  Each folder I want threaded in a particular way remembers
 it's individual setting.

But to accomplish this I would have to set up the heading columns for
each of my several dozen folders individually, a somewhat tedious job.

It seems to me a misfeature for TB! to have tied threading to the
folder Use account default column settings, such that any change in
the threading selection for any one folder with that option ticked
results in that threading selection being propogated to all folders so
ticked.

Or am I missing something?  Any enlightenment appreciated.

-- 

Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Markus,

On 08 February 2002 at 12:54:09 +0100 (which was 11:54 where I live)
Markus Gloede wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ATT attachments might also be plain text attachments. You get these when
 you requested a read receipt. fentun only works with DAT attachments,
 AFAIK.

It works with MS-TNEF attachments of the Microsoft Outlook/Exchange
variety. The may be called DAT, TNEF or (as they *always* are when
I receive them) ATT. The original posting was clearly about an MS
Outlook file of some sort, so fentun is the answer in this case.

FWIW, PGP/MIME signatures often come through as ATT attachments for
me too.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ Turbocharge your brain: right here http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y7/8OeQkq5KdzaARAgcXAKDWZS48JMiXCY0uea/hez2suH2o2wCglyBu
uIA1VEoCVPX1SICRW80MGRY=
=zMb5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: threading (or really, unthreading) a folder??

2002-02-08 Thread Alastair Scott

On 08 February 2002 at 11:47 am Dave wrote:

 Melissa Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes - it's one of the things I really appreciate about TB!'s threading
 options.  Each folder I want threaded in a particular way remembers
 it's individual setting.

 But to accomplish this I would have to set up the heading columns for
 each of my several dozen folders individually, a somewhat tedious job.

 It seems to me a misfeature for TB! to have tied threading to the
 folder Use account default column settings, such that any change in
 the threading selection for any one folder with that option ticked
 results in that threading selection being propogated to all folders so
 ticked.

 Or am I missing something?  Any enlightenment appreciated.

To the best of my incomplete knowledge you're not and, really, rather a
lot of TB!'s customisation features are a horrible muddle and need to be
rewritten from scratch.

(I've never understood the 'use account default column settings' - where
are they set? I would expect the defaults to be set in Account
Properties and folders which _don't_ take the defaults to have them
explicitly set via another tab in right-mouse-button | Properties. I'm
afraid that, if things like this don't hit you in the face, they're not
worth using).

If you think the column settings lack clarity, try 'use folder-specific
print settings' - this was explained to me as clearly as it could have
been yet is still utterly incomprehensible. I have neither time nor
inclination to learn such curious user interface notions ...

Alastair

-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
Using Windows 95 and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Alain de Gevigney

Hello Marck,

 On  Fri, 8 Feb 2002 at 11:15:08 [GMT +] (which was 12:15 where I live) you wrote:

MDP Hi Gerard,

MDP On 08 February 2002 at 10:08:14 +0100 (which was 09:08 where I live)
MDP Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the suggestion, but apparently it doesn't work under
W2K. I will search the Net for an other proggie.

MDP Having re-visited the site, I see your confusion. It's an old program
MDP and when the author says Windows 95 he really means Win 32. It
MDP works on all 32 bit versions of windows... and it *does* work.

Yes it work, but not for message.att files that are the
message/delivery-status part of 'attention messages' and are simple text,
it's used for winmail.dat when it contain attachment (size  4k).

-- 
Regards, Alain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36
 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Alain,

On 08 February 2002 at 13:17:56 +0100 (which was 12:17 where I live)
Alain de Gevigney wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Yes it work, but not for message.att files that are the
 message/delivery-status part of 'attention messages' and are simple
 text, it's used for winmail.dat when it contain attachment (size 
 4k).

Why does everybody want to argue with me today? g

I have a friend who constantly sends me attachments as MS-TNEF
thingies that need fentun to unbundle them.

They are ALWAYS called message.att. I thank you.

Yes, I have also seen winmail.dat files and other naming formats
too, but that's not the point. I was just answering a specific
question with a specific solution. Let's not confuse the issue.

Can we close the thread now? Please? (Unless the original poster has
any further questions on the topic and is certain that fentun is *not*
the answer).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - Super brain -from http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y8SbOeQkq5KdzaARAt0eAKDRN3548Y+uykWagFZ8RFk34IqZSwCeLihe
dQHYQ7kSDBwtcAZ/hVfliv0=
=aOQ+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Multiple instances or at least a suggestion?

2002-02-08 Thread Carsten Thnges

Hi Marck,

[ groups ]

MDP I've suggested their use to Rick and have just spent half an hour
MDP trying to work out what they do and how they work. From what I
MDP can see, they do nothing, add nothing and don't work at all as
MDP expected. Right now they look to me like an un-implemented
MDP vestige of an idea.

Hm, they work for me.

You can create groups and add accounts to them, BUT you first have to
declare the accounts as USERS not admins. It's not possible to add an
administration account to groups. Don't ask me why ;-)

-- 
Best regards, Carsten

The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/37) Business
Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 2, PGP 0xe2d25323


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: slight problem when setting up groups (Mark?)

2002-02-08 Thread Carsten Thnges

Hi Rick,

RR [...] Is there a way to move this main 'admin' privileges account
RR into another group.???

why don't you just create a new empty admin account and add the old
one to your group?
-- 
Best regards, Carsten

The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/37) Business
Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 2, PGP 0xe2d25323


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Multiple instances or at least a suggestion?

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Carsten,

On 08 February 2002 at 12:46:02 +0100 (which was 11:46 where I live)
Carsten Thönges wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 You can create groups and add accounts to them, BUT you first have to
 declare the accounts as USERS not admins. It's not possible to add an
 administration account to groups. Don't ask me why ;-)

Okay - and how do you use a group? Do you login to it? When I tried
that, the login was rejected. I could create a group easily enough but
couldn't do anything with it once that was done.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - a spare brain - from: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y8jROeQkq5KdzaARAq6fAJ4yTEiLG1RBV0MZzBiusZhUQQ1f2gCcDTRO
IXeUaME9CwHOudQK+uNmqBw=
=9zwS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Multiple instances or at least a suggestion?

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Carsten,

On 08 February 2002 at 12:46:02 +0100 (which was 11:46 where I live)
Carsten Thönges wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hm, they work for me.

Aha - they do for me now too.

 You can create groups and add accounts to them, BUT you first have
 to declare the accounts as USERS not admins. It's not possible to
 add an administration account to groups. Don't ask me why ;-)

That's correct. I still don't know why it didn't work for me first
time I tried it, but I just created a group and added four user
accounts to it, logged in using the name and password of the group and
there were those four (and just those four) accounts. Check/Send for
all only applied to those four. All-in-all, it works as you'd expect
and as Rick is looking for.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - free to think - go to http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y8uJOeQkq5KdzaARAr6PAJ90ka7fre+xWcbKEhlZ8iYG8pzHzQCg61pZ
mpYbMO0fSKssXQP0vT+e3Mc=
=HG76
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Gerard de Vries

 
ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 1:29:13 PM, you wrote:

Marck -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marck Hash: SHA1

Marck Can we close the thread now? Please? (Unless the original poster has
Marck any further questions on the topic and is certain that fentun is *not*
Marck the answer).

Marck,

I have downloaded the program (fentun.exe -219kb) three times now and when I click
it nothing happened and  mean absolutely nothing.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard  

Insert Cookie Here-- Democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of 
variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike. 
- Plato, The Republic. Book VIII. 558 -

Windows 2000 Professional with TB Version 1.53t 



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Gerard,

On 08 February 2002 at 14:18:19 +0100 (which was 13:18 where I live)
Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I have downloaded the program (fentun.exe -219kb) three times now
 and when I click it nothing happened and mean absolutely nothing.

Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
get the opportunity to extract them.

I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
specifies Start in the same folder. I save my attachment to that
folder, open the folder, drag the file onto fentun, extract the files
and they are saved back into the same folder again, ready to use.

HTH.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm -  think ... clearly  : http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y9NkOeQkq5KdzaARAv+4AJ4pPev+BKSCFAIMm6RorW8YQve5oACguD5E
Svq+m7F6CoSScqOur2+PIb4=
=dAvm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread DG Raftery Sr.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

Friday, February 08, 2002
8:51:27 AM
RE: Beta Team

Greetings All,

How would one (a registered user of The_Bat! for a few years) become
part of the beta team?

Thanks.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

Error:015: Unable to exit Windows. Try the door.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6

iQEVAwUAPGPYfWaEPHoZkrdjAQHfoggA8BxzhoogqiNZqfXftgGZWsWFRj3Dz6dg
YoEH9OPBGUGQhxYZRYy026K1sMmW644dyFUyQMHxGA/IrtzVvfm641ydJjJZiER0
4hKgpoCJApy73YZQu8fnVKLEG+EC3doO5a+YnRgWaIl+0ejEpj2OuabS9IsJy+6e
GF6CrZa+MDFWARUllQXnakX4Y53BdefHaZlyQUbBqplUbeczSsO2VNAct2H4W+nG
0zEipPXWdEDVu+opY2DiQbt2sLCF/1kGDUFDPm8wSfXu2qP2QuakhzdWjroVZPkA
PsxlwZzBRDpUWOd96TlQhJIdIjyoXMQGNIYZ6OWevtxSMd3c72pFTQ==
=RJMr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi DG,

On 08 February 2002 at 08:54:13 -0500 (which was 13:54 where I live)
DG Raftery Sr. wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 How would one (a registered user of The_Bat! for a few years) become
 part of the beta team?

Subscribe to the discussion list here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm -   room to think - http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y9tjOeQkq5KdzaARArBIAKDgscOPNC8zVbGmOHq1Vlu9YtDbUACaAgfR
c79A852hfcfr4YRlUZlgf3E=
=OATI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Mary Cassidy


Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

 Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
 it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
 you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
 get the opportunity to extract them.

 I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
 specifies Start in the same folder. I save my attachment to that
 folder, open the folder, drag the file onto fentun, extract the files
 and they are saved back into the same folder again, ready to use.


Wow, that's really, really convenient!


Wish list
-

1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
normal mailreaders do?

2. Please can somebody rewrite the help file so that it's actually
helpful?

3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
text editor?

Otherwise, I really like it :-)

-- 
Mary

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Multiple instances or at least a suggestion?

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann

On Friday, February 8, 2002, 7:58:46 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:


 Hm, they work for me.

Yes, and they work for me too, but I'm sort of stuck now because now I
want the main account that was tied to the admin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to
now become a part of a group. I made a new dummy account called
Admin and that's the main one I want associated with the admin and I
want the [EMAIL PROTECTED] one to be available for a normal group.

To those who use groups to see what I'm talking about create a new
group and try to assign the main account you started with to this new
group. You won't see it in the list to choose from (at least I don't:)

Any help in this area would be much appreciated.



--

Rick

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instead of studying for finals, what about just going to the Bahamas
and catching some rays? Maybe you'll flunk, but you might have flunked
anyway; that's my point.
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Jernej Simoni

Hello Mary,

08. februar 2002, 15:09:37, you wrote:

MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?

It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
proprietary format.

MC 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
MC text editor?

Outlook has a primitive editor. The Bat's editor is perfect for e-mail
(do a search in the archives for the word editor).

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

Whenever in time, and wherever in the universe, any man speaks or
writes in any detail about the technical management of a poem, the
resulting irascibility of the reader's response is a constant.
   -- Ciardi's Poetry Law


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Markus Gloede

Hi,

Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

 FWIW, PGP/MIME signatures often come through as ATT attachments for me
 too.

I think mutt, a widespread *nix MUA, does this.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 6 


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Mary Cassidy


Jernej Simoni wrote:


 MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
 MC normal mailreaders do?

 It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
 proprietary format.

I don't have wide experience of other mailreaders, just Netscape and
Eudora, and I've never had these strange .att and .msg attachments
before. I can open the .msg ones, but not the .att's, as other people
have said.

Today I received a message (not html) with a message.msg attached.
When I opened it by double-clicking, I could read the message OK, and
on another tab there was a tiny jpg image. When I maximised the
window the image was enlarged, but when I opened the message a second time it
didn't enlarge, and I had to click back and forth between the two tabs before
it would enlarge.

 MC 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
 MC text editor?

 Outlook has a primitive editor. The Bat's editor is perfect for e-mail
 (do a search in the archives for the word editor).

I've never used Outlook, and I'm getting used to TB's editor, but I
still find it primitive.
I didn't mean that I want an html editor; I prefer text because of the
virus risk.

What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the
wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess about
with ALT-L or wade through the menus looking for formatting options.

I've given up using autoformat (or was it justify on wrap?), because
it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
twice at the end of each paragraph.
It may sound like no big deal, but when you spend all day typing in
programs that wrap automatically, it just doesn't come naturally.

-- 
Mary

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Gerard de Vries

 
ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 2:32:18 PM, you wrote:

Marck Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
Marck it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
Marck you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
Marck get the opportunity to extract them.

Marck I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
Marck specifies Start in the same folder. I save my attachment to that
Marck folder, open the folder, drag the file onto fentun, extract the files
Marck and they are saved back into the same folder again, ready to use.

Hi Marck,
  I have it all working now.
  I guess I should have read the FAQ :-)

  One last question, the file I received as message.att turned out to
  be an excel spreadsheet. Why isn't it sent as an excel spreadsheet.
  Is it some form of compression?

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard  

Insert Cookie Here-- Ever stop to think, and forget to start again? 

Windows 2000 Professional with TB Version 1.53t 



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Alain de Gevigney

Hello Gerard,

 On  Fri, 8 Feb 2002 at 14:18:19 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:18 where I live) you wrote:

 
GdV Marck,

GdV I have downloaded the program (fentun.exe -219kb) three times now and when I click
GdV it nothing happened and  mean absolutely nothing.

You can ...
1) associate .att (or .dat) with fentun
2) save it to disk and use the drag-drop to put the file on fentun

3) try to associate the mime type application/ms-tnef to fentun (never
done here)

-- 
Regards, Alain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36
 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Editor [WAS] Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann

On Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, Mary wrote:

MC What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
MC write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the
MC wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess about
MC with ALT-L or wade through the menus looking for formatting options.

I know it's probably been brought up a million times, but what is
the reasoning behind why the editor works this way? That is why
when I go back and add text it doesn't wrap it nicely but has it
stick out or do other crazy stuff and then I have to use ALT-L?
And then like Mary said when auto-format is on it messes with the
line breaks. I'm getting used to going back and doing alt-L on
things but I'm curious why it is set up this way? I mean I have a
powerful text editor called UltraEdit and with wrapping on it
preserves line breaks but yet wraps according to what ever margin
I set it at.  Not trying to bring up the whole Bat editor war,
just curious behind the reasoning why it is the way it is.

-- 

Rick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The memories of my family outings are still a source of strength to
me. I remember we'd all pile into the car - I forget what kind it was
- and drive and drive. I'm not sure where we'd go, but I think there
were some trees there. The smell of something was strong in the air as
we played whatever sport we played. I remember a bigger, older guy we
called Dad.' We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went
home. I guess some things never leave you.
 
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread David Denton

Hello Mary,

Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, you wrote:

MC I've given up using autoformat (or was it justify on wrap?), because
MC it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
MC twice at the end of each paragraph.
MC It may sound like no big deal, but when you spend all day typing in
MC programs that wrap automatically, it just doesn't come naturally.

   I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that,
   after a month or so of using it, I wish I could configure my other
   text editors and word processors so they worked in the same manner.

-- 
Best regards,
 David   


Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 1


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten

Hello Mary,

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:09:37 +0100GMT (8-2-2002, 15:09 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?

There is no 'like normal mailreaders do'. Recently somebody posted an
attachment with outlook 2000 to a restricted list I'm subscribed to.
Two members using Outlook Express didn't even see the attachment. One
member, using Eudora, saw the attachment, but had troubles accessing
it. TB saw the attachment, could save it, could access it.

Can't say that I've ever had any problems with TB handling
attachments.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Mary,

On 08 February 2002 at 15:48:07 +0100 (which was 14:48 where I live)
Mary Cassidy wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
 write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the
 wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess
 about with ALT-L or wade through the menus looking for formatting
 options.

The default formatting option is not to use Auto-format. The editor
preferences are few and reasonably simple. Auto-format is easily
turned on and then even more easily controlled with the Ctrl-Shift-F
keystroke. This is the option whereby the wrapping automatically puts
itself right.

 I've given up using autoformat (or was it justify on wrap?), because
 it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
 twice at the end of each paragraph.

Not really - it's just something to get used to. It greatly improves
plain-text legibility and is a habit worth cultivating.

 It may sound like no big deal, but when you spend all day typing in
 programs that wrap automatically, it just doesn't come naturally.

The default is to autowrap, but not to auto re-wrap.

As is often said here, the editor takes some getting used to but the
majority find it a task worth undertaking. There's a noisy minority
that will leap in and say It's horrible, an abomination, get rid of
it, I hate it, but the consensus remains - try to get used to it.
It's a great little editor once you get to know it, capable of many
things that lesser editors just can't handle, and *so* well suited for
the task at hand.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - think ... freely- http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /

TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y/RjOeQkq5KdzaARApeqAKCRyDZiB3NgDQqjQ4vgV/Yk+byq/wCfeNFl
0kXM/1ux+Gdwtvc1I5jR2Lg=
=z8T1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi David,

On 08 February 2002 at 10:48:25 -0500 (which was 15:48 where I live)
David Denton wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that,
after a month or so of using it, I wish I could configure my other
text editors and word processors so they worked in the same manner.

Exactly!

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - let the thoughts flow http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y/MQOeQkq5KdzaARAkN/AJsGYnS6HdZNC8fgj4NCN2piPSQ6NwCfS6I+
2UHi394TqKVvnIVY5eioyIQ=
=2kRT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Shahar

On Friday, February 08, 2002, at 16:09:37, Mary wrote about:
Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)


 I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
 specifies Start in the same folder. I save my attachment to that
 folder, open the folder, drag the file onto fentun, extract the files
 and they are saved back into the same folder again, ready to use.


 Wow, that's really, really convenient!

Thank you *very much* for that Howto.
Where do you want to go today :-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Jonathan Wayne

Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
same way!  The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
(keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
configuration.

TB is actually pretty good, but it would be nice to be able to remap the
keyboard - and not just for the editor - so that one doesn't have to remember
multiple ways to do the same thing (e.g., reformat paragraph, F5 for search,
etc.)


jon

Friday, February 08, 2002, 10:48:25 AM, you wrote:

Hello Mary,

Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, you wrote:

MC I've given up using autoformat (or was it justify on wrap?), because
MC it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
MC twice at the end of each paragraph.
MC It may sound like no big deal, but when you spend all day typing in
MC programs that wrap automatically, it just doesn't come naturally.

   I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that,
   after a month or so of using it, I wish I could configure my other
   text editors and word processors so they worked in the same manner.

-
 Jonathan Wayne  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Alastair Scott

On 08 February 2002 at 4:00 pm Jonathan wrote:

 Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
 same way!  The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
 (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
 configuration.

 TB is actually pretty good, but it would be nice to be able to remap the
 keyboard - and not just for the editor - so that one doesn't have to remember
 multiple ways to do the same thing (e.g., reformat paragraph, F5 for search,
 etc.)

I think the problem is that TB!'s editor is deliberately _not_ like
other editors in many ways. That doesn't mean that it's wrong, but the
ubiquity of Microsoft applications (and copies of the way they do
things) exerts enormous hidden pressure to always do things the same
way.

Something else useful for new users (and old users :) would be a button
in Options | Editor Preferences to reset them to the defaults. It is
_very easy_ to go away from the defaults and get completely confused ...

(This is wish no.492 for those who want to look in the bugtracker).

Alastair

-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
Using Windows 95 and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dave Goodman


I'm importing messages from another system into TB!.  Mostly it has
gone smoothly, using the Unix message format.

However, the last files imported , when displayed in the TB! MESSAGE
LIST, show almost all of the messages dated at the date/time of
import, rather than the correct message creation date/time. When a
single message is displayed in the MESSAGE VIEW, the timestamp is
always:

Sat, 30 Dec 1899  00:00:00  ()

An examination of the Unix file with a text editor shows the format to
be correct, with the original date/timestamps in place. Further, the
file imports correctly into several other programs which accept the
Unix file format.

Anyone know what's going on here?

-- 

Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann


AS I think the problem is that TB!'s editor is deliberately _not_ like
AS other editors in many ways. That doesn't mean that it's wrong, but the
AS ubiquity of Microsoft applications (and copies of the way they do
AS things) exerts enormous hidden pressure to always do things the same
AS way.

Well, I use a lot of editors that are not related to Micorsoft and
I don't think they all are trying to copy microsoft. Before I
complain at all, maybe I should first make the comment that
possibly I just have things set up wrong. Here's what I don't get:

Scenario I - Auto-Format is Off.
I go along and type up up stuff. Type some paragraphs hit return
to start a new paragraph. Everything is fine. Then I have to go
back add some text here and there and the text gets all messed up
so I have hit Alt-L periodically to clear things up. This I find
incredibly annoying, I'm sorry, you guys might like it but I'm
sorry I don't like it. So the answer you say is use Auto-Format,
which brings up scenario II.

Secnario II - Auto-Format On.
Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
everything is great until I hit return/enter and it doesn't bring
me to a new line.

I just really must be missing something here. This has nothing to
do with microsoft. I'm all for keeping the editor the way it is if
there is a good reason for this behavior that I just don't get.
And if there is a reason for this behavior this should be the
exception to the norm and the option be to select this type of
behavior.

The bottom line is why is there a not an option so that I can type
text have it wrap, be able to insert text and not have to use
Alt-L to reformat, and be able to hit enter to generate a new
line? This is simply intuitive and really has nothing to do with
being conditioned or anything by using other editors.

If I simply have The Bat! options configured wrong someone please
let me know. Thanks Lots.

_

Rick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and
prejudices and just laugh at people.
 
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Problems with Reply Template

2002-02-08 Thread Abraham Zablocki

I seem to have a problem with my reply template. When I try to reply
to a message, I get a double copy of the message text. See below for a
recent example.

The text of my reply template is:
Hello %OFromFName,

%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS
 On %ODATE at %SUBPATT=3GMT%SUBPATT=4 (which was %OTIME where I live) %OFROMNAME 
wrote and made these points on the subject of %OSUBJ:
%quotes=%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(^-+ eGroups.*~-~.*-*_-$\s+){0,1}(^-BEGIN PGP 
SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(- --\s*\n|-BEGIN PGP 
SIGNATURE)|\z)%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%text%SUBPATT=4 

%Quotes
%Cursor

-- 
Best regards,
 %FromFNamemailto:%FromAddr


I don't know where I got it from. Maybe it was originally installed
with The Bat?

Many thanks for any help. At the moment it's really limiting my usage
of The Bat, and I find I'm still using Outlook Express for daily email
because of it.

regards,
Abraham Zablocki


Hello hifromroger,

 On Thursday, February 07, 2002 at 16:22:42GMT - (which was 11:22 AM where I live) 
hifromroger wrote and made these points on the subject of [eccopro] Using Net 
Location:
h Does anyone know of a way to shoot a URL to a specific folder?  
h The current view function works great, however I have to go to 
h Ecco, open the net location folder and then go back to explorer and 
h send it.  I tried to select folders.. from shooter with no luck

h Ecco Rocks!
h Roger




h To Post a message, send it to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

h Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 

h Does anyone know of a way to shoot a URL to a specific folder?  
h The current view function works great, however I have to go to 
h Ecco, open the net location folder and then go back to explorer and 
h send it.  I tried to select folders.. from shooter with no luck

h Ecco Rocks!
h Roger




h To Post a message, send it to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

h Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

1. Create a form with the folder(s) you want to shoot to.

2. Shoot - Add by Form

(You could also create a separate form for each folder that you want
to shoot to, if there aren't too many).

-- 
Best regards,
 Abrahammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


To Post a message, send it to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dave Goodman


Following up my own message in this thread a few minutes ago:

 I'm importing messages from another system into TB!.  Mostly it has
 gone smoothly, using the Unix message format.

 However, the last files imported , when displayed in the TB! MESSAGE
 LIST, show almost all of the messages dated at the date/time of
 import, rather than the correct message creation date/time. When a
 single message is displayed in the MESSAGE VIEW, the timestamp is
 always:

 Sat, 30 Dec 1899  00:00:00  ()

 An examination of the Unix file with a text editor shows the format to
 be correct, with the original date/timestamps in place. Further, the
 file imports correctly into several other programs which accept the
 Unix file format.

 Anyone know what's going on here?

It turns out that the time/date _is_ being imported into TB!.  But it
shows up under the 'Received' time/date, rather than under the
'Created' time/date.

This seems strange.  To me the creation time of the message is the
original time/date when the message was sent, not the time it was
created in TB!.  Further, the strange 1899 date in the individual
message headers remains unexplained.

-- 

Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Problems with Reply Template

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Abraham,

On 08 February 2002 at 10:09:32 -0500 (which was 15:09 where I live)
Abraham Zablocki wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I seem to have a problem with my reply template. When I try to reply
 to a message, I get a double copy of the message text.

Yes, you would.

 See below for a recent example.

 The text of my reply template is:
 Hello %OFromFName,

 
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS
 On %ODATE at %SUBPATT=3GMT%SUBPATT=4 (which was %OTIME where I live)
 %OFROMNAME wrote and made these points on the subject of %OSUBJ:
 %quotes=%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(^-+ eGroups.*~-~.*-*_-$\s+){0,1}(^-BEGIN PGP 
SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(- --\s*\n|-BEGIN PGP
   ^^^ first copy here.
 SIGNATURE)|\z)%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%text%SUBPATT=4

 %Quotes
   ^^ second copy here.
 %Cursor

You are getting what you have asked for. Remove the second %Quotes.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - Super brain -from http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZAR1OeQkq5KdzaARAjdMAJ9on4ynwD/xjHW3RVP0mqGbTJtlvgCg/VXf
LE5Gf245WJFn7NNtNVMh2Ck=
=hS+C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dave,

On 08 February 2002 at 11:47:00 -0500 (which was 16:47 where I live)
Dave Goodman wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 It turns out that the time/date _is_ being imported into TB!.  But it
 shows up under the 'Received' time/date, rather than under the
 'Created' time/date.

 This seems strange.  To me the creation time of the message is the
 original time/date when the message was sent, not the time it was
 created in TB!.  Further, the strange 1899 date in the individual
 message headers remains unexplained.

Might the format of the date stamp in Date: header be slightly off? A
sample would be good. Malformed (or nearly correctly formed) dates
have been responsible for this kind of problem in the past.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm -   free time   - from: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZATXOeQkq5KdzaARAvSGAKDJjWorElvdtgBAlGMjH1ArJ25rGwCdGpof
sWfhL66/szytHDq4PutfMJE=
=I3cZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Gerard,

On 08 February 2002 at 15:44:04 +0100 (which was 14:44 where I live)
Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   One last question, the file I received as message.att turned out to
   be an excel spreadsheet. Why isn't it sent as an excel spreadsheet.
   Is it some form of compression?

No - it's just a Microsoft proprietary attachment encoding method.
MS to MS, it works fine. MS to anyone else? 3rd party decoder needed.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - better planning - at: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8Y+tMOeQkq5KdzaARAgRvAJ9RMAvbGjRcyWwo21qyMmijnHnukwCeNaum
wEp3ORgMNkcIHJBcB/rUbFY=
=wPdy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: slight problem when setting up groups (Mark?)

2002-02-08 Thread Alain de Gevigney

Hello Carsten,

 On  Fri, 8 Feb 2002 at 12:50:06 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:50 where I live) you wrote:

CT Hi Rick,

RR [...] Is there a way to move this main 'admin' privileges account
RR into another group.???

CT why don't you just create a new empty admin account and add the old
CT one to your group?

That what I've done here and it work fine but I don't know if it can be
change when the admin account is already defined - modifying the User
depot\User#1 registry ?.

-- 
Regards, Alain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36
 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread DG Raftery Sr.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

Friday, February 08, 2002
12:12:27 PM
RE: Beta Team

Greetings Marck,

On Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:06:25 AM, you wrote:

Marck Subscribe to the discussion list here:
Marck [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Did that already.

Marck Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
Marck details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
Marck http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

Reports file not found. Am I missing something?

Thanks.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

Best file compression around: DEL *.* = 100% compression

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6

iQEVAwUAPGQHjGaEPHoZkrdjAQFrnwgAgUpSSqhLglPKgnQ9czWx93Kd+d+aVWSu
4TocHN0QdgYW2R0FkPhhmKV83L3zgf6VuXuJPDvmAoeumFKTnwu2ChzusctFonU7
9nETd6uG2CFdxsndn2cpTmKCPBFSq13QIl86A/VGTsCct2mCtmJXeY2jTOAWUcFy
Lkx0ZqKqEcl2HWjkAAxjCzShfq4kGQYKdWT51jKihtJZUEfXiHeHbwDq6RWDmoHw
ZPStIvnmKpKDVAneWWDwJl2kE5vUYr8jJSqbZAVYc+UF+m+cRl6n8H6rDPY9AqMt
KOHouLpHOCT3086hZSIsbA/zV+BQqwZGiBtv3/Yl46KpeSqx95411Q==
=YQoi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Bounce messages

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings Bat Fans,

If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...

,- [ runbox bounce message sample ]
| This message was created automatically by mail delivery software
| (Exim).
|
| A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
| recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
|
|   pipe to |/local/RMM/mail-pipe -f Inbox
`-

... please just delete them and ignore it. I have written to the
runbox postmaster to complain - it's not our fault! OTOH, if you write
to runbox too and demand that they configure their servers correctly,
that wouldn't be a bad thing ... ;-).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - a spare brain - from: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZAecOeQkq5KdzaARAghLAKC4ZT1WrNV+IfCMmX170bRLVoyYqACg5xp8
WKTH3JOLVUpp6yyeAldzlX4=
=Xnug
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi DG,

On 08 February 2002 at 12:15:10 -0500 (which was 17:15 where I live)
DG Raftery Sr. wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Marck Subscribe to the discussion list here:
Marck [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Did that already.

Then we should speak there, where a kind soul will be able to give you
the URL to the beta.

Marck Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
Marck details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
Marck http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

 Reports file not found. Am I missing something?

What, the URL? 'tis there. No problem. Try again. Or do you mean the
beta .rar file?

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - brain extension - at: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZAk6OeQkq5KdzaARAuyfAJ9u709dSZRSIkzcAK1+YLfaMOyAZgCgwyZg
qOlQxzqc/NlZH6sAqJITkKQ=
=epPN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Problems with Reply Template

2002-02-08 Thread Nick Andriash

Hello Abraham Zablocki,

On Friday, February 08 2002 at 07:09 AM PDT, you wrote:

 I seem to have a problem with my reply template. When I try to reply
 to a message, I get a double copy of the message text. See below for a
 recent example.

I like the KISS principle... Why have all that RegEx stuff in there.
Delete the Template and form a new one that you can understand... that
we can all understand ;o)... and fiddle with to your own liking. TB is
so powerful with all the macros that are available, that you shouldn't
even need to use such a perplexing looking RegEx to do anything. ;o)


-- 
Nick Andriash
Courtenay, B.C. Canada


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread Nick Andriash

Hello DG Raftery Sr.,

On Friday, February 08 2002 at 05:54 AM PDT, you wrote:

 How would one (a registered user of The_Bat! for a few years) become
 part of the beta team?

What does the above have to do with the subject slight problem when
setting up groups (Mark?)? Please, in the future try not to create a
new message simply by changing the subject of a reply, because your new
message becomes lost within an old thread and will be missed by many
Readers who may have chosen not to read that thread.

It's just good practice to create a brand new message when you change
the Subject. :o)


-- 
Nick Andriash
Courtenay, B.C. Canada


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Gerard de Vries

 
ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 3:09:37 PM, you wrote:

Mary 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary text editor?

You better stand back and take cover :(

Mary Otherwise, I really like it :-)

To late now ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard  

Insert Cookie Here-- If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a 
nail. -- Maslow 

Windows 2000 Professional with TB Version 1.53t 



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Microsoft attachment

2002-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten

Hello Marck,

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:14:17 +GMT (8-2-2002, 16:14 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

   One last question, the file I received as message.att turned out to
   be an excel spreadsheet. Why isn't it sent as an excel spreadsheet.
   Is it some form of compression?

MDP No - it's just a Microsoft proprietary attachment encoding method.
MDP MS to MS, it works fine. MS to anyone else? 3rd party decoder needed.

Not MS to MS, OE (a real MS product) has problems with those
attachments too.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Bounce messages

2002-02-08 Thread Dierk Haasis

Hello Marck!

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:15:06 PM you wrote:

 ... please just delete them and ignore it. I have written to the
 runbox postmaster to complain - it's not our fault! OTOH, if you write
 to runbox too and demand that they configure their servers correctly,
 that wouldn't be a bad thing ... ;-).

And I just wanted to start my private little war ... ;-)


-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/37 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

The First Amendment presupposes that right conclusions are more likely
to be gathered out of a multitude of tongues, than through any kind of
authoritative selection. (Judge Learned Hand as cited in New York
Times v. Sullivan)


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Dierk Haasis

Hello Gerard!

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:50:04 PM you wrote:

Mary 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary text editor?

 You better stand back and take cover :(

Another of the good tips to follow: Look for the word editor in the
archives:

 1. It will answer the question in question.
 2. You don't have to stand back ...
 3. ... just take shelter, as you will get loads and loads of
 messages about the editor.




-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/37 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Erwarte von anderen nur, was Du selbst bereit bist zu geben. (Romy
Walda)


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dwight A Corrin

On Friday, February 8, 2002, 11:03:17 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

 It turns out that the time/date _is_ being imported into TB!.  But
 it shows up under the 'Received' time/date, rather than under the
 'Created' time/date.

 This seems strange.  To me the creation time of the message is the
 original time/date when the message was sent, not the time it was
 created in TB!.  Further, the strange 1899 date in the individual
 message headers remains unexplained.

 Might the format of the date stamp in Date: header be slightly off? A
 sample would be good. Malformed (or nearly correctly formed) dates
 have been responsible for this kind of problem in the past.

I just looked at some imports I did when I switched to TB!. They all
show the correct created time, and all are marked received for when
they were imported/received by TB!

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706  fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36 on Windows XP version 5,1



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann

Thanks Marck, your explanations are really helping me better
understand this ( even though I'm not totally getting the whole line
return thing, but that's just my ignorance, I'll work on understanding
it better ).

Totally not related to the topic, but Marck, did you modify your
reply template to have it set up to automatically generate it like:

  reply text here

That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply
text. Your way looks much more clear.

Also, stupid question I'm sure but when you made that bulleted list
you simply used the letter o for the bullets and than spaced over
for each bulleted point. My question I guess is being just a text
editor there is no special formatting for creating bulleted lists is
there?

Thanks again.

ORIGINAL THREAD BELOW:


On Friday, February 08, 2002, 12:17:55 PM, Marck wrote:

MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

MDP Hi Rick,

MDP On 08 February 2002 at 11:31:39 -0500 (which was 16:31 where I live)
MDP Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Secnario II - Auto-Format On.
 Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
 everything is great until I hit return/enter and it doesn't
 bring me to a new line.

MDP You need two new lines. Since this is plain text, the only way to
MDP delimit two distinct paragraphs is by have a clear, blank line between
MDP them.

 The bottom line is why is there a not an option so that I can
 type text have it wrap, be able to insert text and not have to
 use Alt-L to reformat, and be able to hit enter to generate a
 new line?

MDP Because a single new line doesn't denote a new pargraph. Sometimes I
MDP want to type a bullet list so I have to turn Auto-Format off. There's
MDP a control key combo for that - it's simple enough to remember -
MDP Ctrl-Shift-F.

MDP o  Typing paragraph data?Turn it on.
MDP o  Typing lists? Turn it off.
MDP o  Amending a paragraph? Turn it on.

 If I simply have The Bat! options configured wrong someone please
 let me know. Thanks Lots.

MDP It's not that you have it configured wrong - just that you are
MDP expecting too much of a plain text format. Plain text only has hard
MDP returns, no soft returns. Auto format is about moving the hard returns
MDP around so that the text better fits the given margins. Where should it
MDP stop moving hard returns? When it gets to a paragraph break. What does
MDP one of those look like? A completely blank line. It is logical, but
MDP not intuitive thanks to expectations brought about by editors which
MDP handle soft returns.

MDP It has been suggested in the past that the TB programmers implement
MDP some system of soft returns. I've always felt that to be dangerous. At
MDP least with the present system, what we type is what will be sent. No
MDP behind-the-scenes formatting for us TB users - oh no! ;-).

MDP FWIW, the TB editor *does* follow a standard. It's a very old one.
MDP It's based on the old MS-DOS SideKick editor, which itself drew from
MDP the old WordStar standard. These standards are still in use in most
MDP Borland IDE editors (with tweaks and additions).



-- 

Rick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why do people in ship mutinies always ask for 'better treatment'? I'd
ask for a pinball machine, because with all that rocking back and
forth you'd probably be able to get a lot of free games.
 
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Moving an admin account to a user group

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann

Sorry to post this again but it was contained in a different thread so
maybe some didn't see it.

I'm wondering if it's possible to allow a new group defined under
network  administration to be able to use the default account that
was initially set up for the administrator. I've tried create a new
boguz Admin account but this still doesn't fee up the initial one
created to be allowed access by a group.

The situation is that I realized as the admin that I'd like to make a
group just for myself where I'd only see my accounts and not those of
my groups. The problem is I can't seem to get access to the main
account that I use as the admin. The only solution I can think of is
to totally recreate this account including all the folders, filters,
etc. This will be a real pain in the butt but I'll do it that way if
there is no other solution.

I don't mind tweaking with the registry if someone knows what I could
mess with.

Thanks for any help with this.


-- 

Rick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

As the light changed from red to green to yellow and back to red
again, I sat there thinking about life. Was it nothing more than a
bunch of honking and yelling? Sometimes it seemed that way.
 
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Nancy Harnois

Hello Bat Users,

  I am trying to connect to a M$ Exchange server with The Bat. The
  password to the mailbox is the NT login name and password.  (The
  mailbox username is different from the NT login name).

  Is it possible to connect to Exchange under these conditions ?

-- 
TIA,
 Nancy  


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Nancy,

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 8:24:41 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in
part):

NH   I am trying to connect to a M$ Exchange server with The Bat. The
NH   password to the mailbox is the NT login name and password.  (The
NH   mailbox username is different from the NT login name).

NH   Is it possible to connect to Exchange under these conditions ?

If IMAP-Server accepts plain text logins there should be no problem.
The Bat! don't care about your NT-UserName (regarding to
MailBox-access), so you can enter the login data freely in The Bat!
account settings.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Life is wasted on the living. - Zaphod Beeblebrox IV


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: ISO settings

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:44:08 +0100GMT (which was 08.02.02, 10:44
+0100GMT where I live), Peter Palmreuther wrote this and more about
ISO settings:

PP As soon as you used the accent TB! recognized it can't sent the
PP mail with 'us-ascii' and for what ever reason it changed the
PP charset to Latin-9. Setting manually to 'Latin-1' before sending
PP should solve the problem until a more sophisticated solution is
PP found :-)

Thank you Pit, so it's a beta issue, isn't it?
- --
Cheers
Peter

Winamp currently playing: Brooks  Dunn - Nothin About You

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar 6.5.8ckt (build 05)
Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :-)

iQA/AwUBPGQgbAM2UgbhB3TOEQLJ1gCg5kuK5RcBqccCcanpRkMGcvLU1SYAnjle
qqaJQMhm6BZWAQgI7PBnVtQ4
=BoyW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: ISO settings

2002-02-08 Thread Carsten Thönges

Hi Peter,

PP As soon as you used the accent TB! recognized it can't sent the
PP mail with 'us-ascii' and for what ever reason it changed the
PP charset to Latin-9. Setting manually to 'Latin-1' before sending
PP should solve the problem until a more sophisticated solution is
PP found :-)

PM Thank you Pit, so it's a beta issue, isn't it?

Yes, see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on
the beta list.
-- 
Best regards, Carsten

The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/38) Business
Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 2, PGP 0xe2d25323


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Nancy Harnois

Hello Peter,

Friday, February 08, 2002, 2:36:36 PM, you wrote:

PP If IMAP-Server accepts plain text logins there should be no problem.
PP The Bat! don't care about your NT-UserName (regarding to
PP MailBox-access), so you can enter the login data freely in The Bat!
PP account settings.


Thanks for your answer but I am afraid I still don't understand.

When login to the server, I need to tell it:

my mailbox name (I put this under user box)
my NT login name
my NT password

When I configure the connection to the server, there is only two boxes
(user and password).  My question is: Is there a way of sending the
three different informations into the two boxes ?

-- 
TIA,
 Nancy   


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Dierk Haasis

Hello Jonathan!

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 5:00:16 PM you wrote:

 Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
 same way!  The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
 (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
 configuration.

1. I am with you on the key mapping ... but, what the h*** does it have
to do with the editor?

2. As for the editors you mention, they are for other purposes than
TB!'s editor. I do really like Word - and there is no arguing that it
is an editor - but don't want TB!'s editor to behave like it
(editorwise).


-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/37 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Paying for movies is like paying for sex - if it's free it feels
better.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




archive request a feature request

2002-02-08 Thread Can Burak ilingir

hi.. could anyone send (redirect) me the thread starting with email id
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?

thread is dated as 30 January 2002 / 23:07. subject: Removing lines
in bodies of incoming mail i clicked on park but it only parked first
message not the whole thread :(

may be this could be a new feature ? there can be an icon which parks
whole thread including future messages :)

thanks in advance..

-- 
. Can Burak Çilingir
... 08.02.2002@15:31
... Ref#nyc174B7AF3


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Bounce messages

2002-02-08 Thread Jernej Simoni

Hello Marck,

08. februar 2002, 18:15:06, you wrote:

MDP If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...

How can they bounce the messages half a year after they were sent? :)

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

If it tastes good, you can't have it. If it tastes awful, you'd
better clean your plate.
   -- Old Children's Law


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Jernej Simoni

Hello Rick,

08. februar 2002, 19:46:48, you wrote:

  reply text here

RR That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
RR where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply
RR text. Your way looks much more clear.

This happened because your original text was indented AFAIK :)

You could however achieve this with some QTs. Only problem is, that
they only work in 1.54 (1.53 crashes if you try to use them)...

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

1. The value of a program is proportional to the weight of its output.
2. Undetectable errors are infinite in variety, in contrast to
   detectable errors, which by definition are limited.
   -- Hind's Laws of Computer Programming


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Rick,

On 08 February 2002 at 11:31:39 -0500 (which was 16:31 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Secnario II - Auto-Format On.
 Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
 everything is great until I hit return/enter and it doesn't
 bring me to a new line.

You need two new lines. Since this is plain text, the only way to
delimit two distinct paragraphs is by have a clear, blank line between
them.

 The bottom line is why is there a not an option so that I can
 type text have it wrap, be able to insert text and not have to
 use Alt-L to reformat, and be able to hit enter to generate a
 new line?

Because a single new line doesn't denote a new pargraph. Sometimes I
want to type a bullet list so I have to turn Auto-Format off. There's
a control key combo for that - it's simple enough to remember -
Ctrl-Shift-F.

o  Typing paragraph data?Turn it on.
o  Typing lists? Turn it off.
o  Amending a paragraph? Turn it on.

 If I simply have The Bat! options configured wrong someone please
 let me know. Thanks Lots.

It's not that you have it configured wrong - just that you are
expecting too much of a plain text format. Plain text only has hard
returns, no soft returns. Auto format is about moving the hard returns
around so that the text better fits the given margins. Where should it
stop moving hard returns? When it gets to a paragraph break. What does
one of those look like? A completely blank line. It is logical, but
not intuitive thanks to expectations brought about by editors which
handle soft returns.

It has been suggested in the past that the TB programmers implement
some system of soft returns. I've always felt that to be dangerous. At
least with the present system, what we type is what will be sent. No
behind-the-scenes formatting for us TB users - oh no! ;-).

FWIW, the TB editor *does* follow a standard. It's a very old one.
It's based on the old MS-DOS SideKick editor, which itself drew from
the old WordStar standard. These standards are still in use in most
Borland IDE editors (with tweaks and additions).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - let the thoughts flow http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZAhEOeQkq5KdzaARAgNXAKClg/mDCklvH0XscYQ05bEtEbEoagCfS8wR
9kVvCgbS2JWOi7qgXCeP0wk=
=FZnJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: archive request a feature request

2002-02-08 Thread Jernej Simoni

Hello Can,

08. februar 2002, 21:53:36, you wrote:

CB may be this could be a new feature ? there can be an icon which parks
CB whole thread including future messages :)

I second that, IMO it should work this way: if the thread is closed
and you park/flag the 1st message, all underlying messages should get
parked, too...

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

If you're coasting, you're going downhill.
   -- Pierson's Law


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Bounce messages

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Jernej,

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 9:54:47 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):

MDP If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...

JS How can they bounce the messages half a year after they were sent? :)

With a crap of mail server configuration, and maybe 'playing with
re-queuing messages' one can ... it's stupid, but possible.
It no more stupid than bouncing the message to 'From:' instead of
'Return-Path:' :-)
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Dogs come when you call. Cats have answering machines.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Out of Memory/Grid index out of range

2002-02-08 Thread Kitty


Hi Alain

 On Thursday, February 07, 2002 at 09:09:51GMT +0100 (which was 2:09 AM where I live) 
Alain de Gevigney wrote and made these points on the subject of Out of Memory/Grid 
index out of range:

 Do you check your index files (.Tbi) ?
  A sign of a corrupt index can be an error when trying to backup,
  in this case try to delete it and restart The Bat!.

This may have been it.  I went in and deleted all the tbi files and
haven't had problems since then so hope that was it.  Thanks.

--
Best regards,
Kitty  ^,,^mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.  --  Abraham
Lincoln


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Alastair Scott

On 08 February 2002 at 20:31 Nancy wrote:

 When I configure the connection to the server, there is only two boxes
 (user and password).  My question is: Is there a way of sending the
 three different informations into the two boxes ?

Aha, this suddenly came to me because my work situation is similar :)

It's possible that the configuration should be set as:

user name = mailbox\user

password = password

or

mail server = mailbox.walshautomation.com

user name = user

password = password

as I've seen both.

However, your system people are going to have to tell you this as
there seem to be many (almost random) ways of setting these things up.

Alastair


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread Dierk Haasis

Hello Nick!

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:48:04 PM you wrote:

 It's just good practice to create a brand new message when you change
 the Subject. :o)

Considering the number of new messages with wrong or missing subjects
I've seen in the last time (not just her), maybe we should rephrase
this to:

 It is good practice to start a NEW message when starting a New
 message.

Hmmm, bad day ...




-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/37 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

One thing about the past. It's likely to last. (Ogden Nash)


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dave Goodman


Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Might the format of the date stamp in Date: header be slightly off? A
 sample would be good. Malformed (or nearly correctly formed) dates
 have been responsible for this kind of problem in the past.

 I just looked at some imports I did when I switched to TB!. They all
 show the correct created time, and all are marked received for when
 they were imported/received by TB!

 Yes, but that only applies to the ones that worked. The set that
 hasn't worked may have a different format of date header... again, a
 sample would be nice...

Thanks to Marck and Dwight for your replies.  Sorry to have been tardy
with samples; I've been offline all afternoon.

I now see what's happening, though I don't have a solution yet.  The
problem is that the Unix message file exported by my former MUA (Forte
Agent v1.8) does not include an actual 'Date:' header at all _if_ the
message was one that originated with Agent.

For example, here is an actual header from a message sent by me
using Agent:

From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 15:58:39 2002
From: Dave Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [stripped for privacy]
Subject: Re: Congratulations
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548

Note that the customary Unix 'From' line, including the timestamp,
starts the message, but there is no formal 'Date:' header.

By contrast, here is a header from a message sent by me using TB!:

From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Feb  8 11:30:36 2002
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:30:36 -0500
From: Dave Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Importing Messages (Unix file)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This peculiar behavior of Agent occurs only with messages originating
from Agent, making it impossible to import my Agent 'Sent' folder into
TB!.  All other folders import perfectly.

Well, I'll have to consult the authorities in an Agent forum.  Still,
any thoughts would be welcome.

-- 

Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dave Goodman

Repost of previous.  Apparently TB! didn't like the headers embedded
in the message and broke it into three parts.  Headers are now quoted.

Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Might the format of the date stamp in Date: header be slightly off? A
 sample would be good. Malformed (or nearly correctly formed) dates
 have been responsible for this kind of problem in the past.

 I just looked at some imports I did when I switched to TB!. They all
 show the correct created time, and all are marked received for when
 they were imported/received by TB!

 Yes, but that only applies to the ones that worked. The set that
 hasn't worked may have a different format of date header... again, a
 sample would be nice...

Thanks to Marck and Dwight for your replies.  Sorry to have been tardy
with samples; I've been offline all afternoon.

I now see what's happening, though I don't have a solution yet.  The
problem is that the Unix message file exported by my former MUA (Forte
Agent v1.8) does not include an actual 'Date:' header at all _if_ the
message was one that originated with Agent.

For example, here is an actual header from a message sent by me
using Agent:

 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 15:58:39 2002
 From: Dave Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Congratulations
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548

Note that the customary Unix 'From' line, including the timestamp,
starts the message, but there is no formal 'Date:' header.

By contrast, here is a header from a message sent by me using TB!:

 From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Feb  8 11:30:36 2002
 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:30:36 -0500
 From: Dave Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Personal
 X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Importing Messages (Unix file)
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This peculiar behavior of Agent occurs only with messages originating
from Agent, making it impossible to import my Agent 'Sent' folder into
TB!.  All other folders import perfectly.

Well, I'll have to consult the authorities in an Agent forum.  Still,
any thoughts would be welcome.

-- 

Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list

2002-02-08 Thread Dirk Heiser

Hi Marck,

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:17:55 +, you wrote:

 Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
 everything is great until I hit return/enter and it doesn't
 bring me to a new line.

 You need two new lines. Since this is plain text, the only way to
 delimit two distinct paragraphs is by have a clear, blank line between
 them.

Sorry but you are wrong ;-) if you are in TB!s editor the text is
_not_ plain text, its some binary data in the PCs memory.

I see _no_ reason why it should not possibly to have soft and hard
line breaks. Every other plain text editor i know do it also, only the
one in TB! does it not.

So what's wrong with: You type your mail and TB! do on the fly soft
line breaks at the 72 column (or whatever you set in options), if you
hit enter the editor to do an hard line break. Then if the mail are
send TB! could turn all soft line break to hard line breaks.


The way the editor now work are simply crazy (_not_ IMHO) and I am do
not know any other editor that do such stupid thinks.

 Because a single new line doesn't denote a new pargraph. Sometimes I
 want to type a bullet list so I have to turn Auto-Format off. There's
 a control key combo for that - it's simple enough to remember -
 Ctrl-Shift-F.

 o  Typing paragraph data?Turn it on.
 o  Typing lists? Turn it off.
 o  Amending a paragraph? Turn it on.

Well with an real editor its also possible to write normal text and
bullet list without always switch the options.

 expecting too much of a plain text format. Plain text only has hard

And again, how does the editor handle the stuff internally are not
related to the output text format. For Example even in an Plain text
mail TB! show me different colors for the quoted text (yes its
possible because internally you do not use plain text) :-)

 It has been suggested in the past that the TB programmers implement
 some system of soft returns. I've always felt that to be dangerous. At

Well i noticed no dangerous thinks with my other plain text editors.

 least with the present system, what we type is what will be sent. No
 behind-the-scenes formatting for us TB users - oh no! ;-).

There are no behind the user formatting with soft returns. Only the
convert from soft to hard. But the user see this while writing.

 FWIW, the TB editor *does* follow a standard. It's a very old one.

*ROTFL* Not an bug or missing feature only an old standard.

 It's based on the old MS-DOS SideKick editor, which itself drew from
 the old WordStar standard. These standards are still in use in most
 Borland IDE editors (with tweaks and additions).

Well in an IDE editor you need other features as in an editor for
email. In programming you does no wan't line breaks at 72 chars.

And BTW i not buy my P200 to work with the same editor an 8086 system
have used because of its limited power.

SCNR,
 Dirk
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36 (S/N 12A1F196 / Educational) under Windows 95 4.0 Build 
  B

-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: archive request a feature request

2002-02-08 Thread Ravi Joshi

Hi Jernej,

Friday, February 08, 2002, 4:08:13 PM, you wrote:

JS Hello Can,

JS 08. februar 2002, 21:53:36, you wrote:

CB may be this could be a new feature ? there can be an icon which parks
CB whole thread including future messages :)

JS I second that, IMO it should work this way: if the thread is closed
JS and you park/flag the 1st message, all underlying messages should get
JS parked, too...


I believe it does work this way. If you right click on the closed thread you will see 
a thread option, go a click on
Park...it will park the entire thread.

-- 
Best Regards,

Ravi


Reply Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. - Gandhi


Holy Bat! Mail!...This message created on The Bat! version 1.53d


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: archive request a feature request

2002-02-08 Thread Can Burak Cilingir

JS I second that, IMO it should work this way: if the thread is
JS closed and you park/flag the 1st message, all underlying messages
JS should get parked, too...

no it does not work just by clicking the icon. you have to use thread
menu..  but it does not give the option to park the future
messages..


-- 
. Can Burak Cilingir 
... 09.02.2002@02:03
... Ref#nycE5CE992B


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: archive request a feature request

2002-02-08 Thread Henry Harte

Hello Ravi,

Saturday, February 09, 2002, 10:58:15 AM, 



in reply, when it was said that:
RJ Hi Jernej,

RJ Friday, February 08, 2002, 4:08:13 PM, you wrote:

JS Hello Can,

JS 08. februar 2002, 21:53:36, you wrote:

CB may be this could be a new feature ? there can be an icon which parks
CB whole thread including future messages :)

JS I second that, IMO it should work this way: if the thread is closed
JS and you park/flag the 1st message, all underlying messages should get
JS parked, too...


RJ I believe it does work this way. If you right click on the closed thread you will 
see a thread option, go a click on
RJ Park...it will park the entire thread.

   Either open or closed thread!


-- 
Best regards,
 Henrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther

Hello Nancy,

On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 9:31:41 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in
part):

NH Thanks for your answer but I am afraid I still don't understand.

NH When login to the server, I need to tell it:

NH my mailbox name (I put this under user box)
NH my NT login name
NH my NT password

NH When I configure the connection to the server, there is only two boxes
NH (user and password).  My question is: Is there a way of sending the
NH three different informations into the two boxes ?

From your explanations I guess 'mailbox name' is the folder name your
mail resists in.
From RFC I know for sure IMAP-server only need username and password
to log you in, so one of these two: 'mailbox name'  'NT login name'
is the 'real' username, the other have to be something special or even
proprietary.
As our Exchange-Server does not allow plain text logins I can't check
this out, so you'll have to ask your sys-admin what's the 'Username'
and what's the 'Password' for _logging in_.

But don't expect too much from IMAP capabilities The Bat! offers,
they're still far from being finished, but more _very_ rudimentary.
A better POP3 replacement from point of current implementation.
This shall change in next versions, but implementing SSL took
precedence for several reasons.
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2)

Power, n: The only narcotic regulated by the SEC instead of the FDA.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dwight,

On 08 February 2002 at 12:37:23 -0600 (which was 18:37 where I live)
Dwight A Corrin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Might the format of the date stamp in Date: header be slightly off? A
 sample would be good. Malformed (or nearly correctly formed) dates
 have been responsible for this kind of problem in the past.

 I just looked at some imports I did when I switched to TB!. They all
 show the correct created time, and all are marked received for when
 they were imported/received by TB!

Yes, but that only applies to the ones that worked. The set that
hasn't worked may have a different format of date header... again, a
sample would be nice...

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - let the thoughts flow http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZECtOeQkq5KdzaARAgpeAJ9I+qpr5TOew+2VetJGtB9aRaKSXgCgjJFI
vKb9jJd2Cm8Fi5UEMZN6Dr4=
=8vf+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Bounce messages

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jernej,

On 08 February 2002 at 21:54:47 +0100 (which was 20:54 where I live)
Jernej Simonèiè wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MDP If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...

 How can they bounce the messages half a year after they were sent? :)

That's ISPs for you!

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm -   mind power   -  at: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZELnOeQkq5KdzaARApI5AKDvVyAKq30SoKDbNjiTu+OYdWUaHQCdFkX5
sAi4I3+vXO2vR6BCHzFF7yQ=
=IL/K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Jernej Simoni

Hello Jonathan,

08. februar 2002, 22:28:31, you wrote:

snip
JW TB's Shift-F7 and Ctrl-F7 are like nothing else I've seen. I find
JW them quite awkward (in general I prefer one handed keyboard short
JW cuts.)

Look at Norton Commander's (and it's clones') editor :)

JW 2) Reformatting a paragraph. I like Ctrl-R (although in ME, it's much more handy
JW in that it will reformat the paragraph and the cursor will then move to the next
JW one.) I do see the logic in TB's mapping for it, but again I'd like to be
JW consistent between editors.

Bat  uses Alt+L for left, Alt+R for right, Alt+J for justify and Alt+C
for center...

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.54 Beta/36 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

The length of any meeting is inversely proportional to the length of
the agenda for that meeting.
   -- McLaughlin's Law


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Sorting messages

2002-02-08 Thread Claude Renaud

Hi everybody,


   I  would  like  to ask you a question from which I have not find an
   answer yet.

  I  know  how  to sort (or view threads by) sender and I also
  know  how  to sort messages by received or creation time but
  the  thing  I  would  like  to do is the following : arrange
  messages alphabetically andsort this result chronogically as
  we can do with ms outlook express or outlook 2000/2002.

And  I would like to tell you about a strange thing about time sorting
:  I  don't  understand  why when we sort messages by received time or
creation  time,  messages are sorted descending by default whereas the
descending  order  option is not checked; and so we have to peculiarly
check this option to have them sorted correctly.

-- 
Best regards,
 Claude  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[3]: IMAP4 settings and Exchange Server

2002-02-08 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Nancy,

My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.53d) Educational
to write the following on Friday, February 08, 2002 at 3:31:41 PM.
NH Hello Peter,

NH Friday, February 08, 2002, 2:36:36 PM, you wrote:

PP If IMAP-Server accepts plain text logins there should be no problem.
PP The Bat! don't care about your NT-UserName (regarding to
PP MailBox-access), so you can enter the login data freely in The Bat!
PP account settings.


NH Thanks for your answer but I am afraid I still don't understand.

NH When login to the server, I need to tell it:

NH my mailbox name (I put this under user box)
NH my NT login name
NH my NT password

NH When I configure the connection to the server, there is only two boxes
NH (user and password).  My question is: Is there a way of sending the
NH three different informations into the two boxes ?

I have used TB IMAP4 to get mail from an M$ Exchange 5.5 Server, and
only gave it the mailbox name and password.  Have you tried it?  Are
your mailbox and login ID's different?  Domain/AD?  What ver of Exch?
Did you try POP3 (you may not like TB's current IMAP implementation, I
haven't found it to be better than POP...)?  Have you asked your Exch
Admin's how to IMAP or POP you mail?  They would probably have better
answers.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.53d (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows NT 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 1)
What does this red button do?


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Rick,

On 08 February 2002 at 13:46:48 -0500 (which was 18:46 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  reply text here

 That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
 where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply
 text. Your way looks much more clear.

Nah - it was as Pit said - just that your original text was indented
when I quoted it.

 ... My question I guess is being just a text editor there is no
 special formatting for creating bulleted lists is there?

No there wasn't. It was as simple as 'o' and TAB (which, on the second
line, lines up with the indent on the first, etc.).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - a spare brain - from: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZIPWOeQkq5KdzaARAsWEAKCXqFWvoz4VQDkfLxJm9gkYB42xQgCeLEgz
69j+7uYL19PiqsdkE1AeaW4=
=3MAA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread John Phillips



Hello Marck
You wrote  On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, at 14:06:25 [GMT +] (01:06 Australian Eastern 
Time,Saturday):

 Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
 details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
 http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.


Shouldn't the URL be http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html ?

-- 
Regards
John Phillips   Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML mail  spam not welcome.
Bat! 1.54 Beta/34 Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446  ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS 
Pentium 300 64meg ram


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi John,

On 09 February 2002 at 13:57:29 +1100 (which was 02:57 where I live)
John Phillips wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
 details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
 http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

 Shouldn't the URL be http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html ?

That's the URL of the RITlabs beta page. It's not as up to date as the
TBBETA message archive, the URL I gave. Also, the RIT beta page gives
no details of the contents of the beta versions. The TBBETA archive
has all release notes. I gave the URL of the TBBETA archive.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm -  Brain power   - from http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/37-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8ZJOQOeQkq5KdzaARAs3xAKCThaHdLPwXU+PcpFxstBGNh+dpJQCgqwEW
ky6wcKuz8K7wAwil3aFdsXc=
=1nxw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Are you a winner? (not spam)

2002-02-08 Thread John Phillips



Hello fellow Bat! fans.

From the Bat! web site:-

Note. You can win $10,000 and a Sony DVD Player by just recommending The Bat!
to a friend who does not use The Bat! yet

Anybody ever win?  (cynical mode turned on, I guess)

-- 
Regards,
John Phillips   Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML mail  spam not welcome.

Bat! 1.54 Beta/34 Windows 98 4.10 Build 67766446  ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS 
Pentium 300 64meg ram


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread DG Raftery Sr.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

Friday, February 08, 2002
11:33:54 PM
RE: Beta Team

Greetings Marck,

On Friday, February 8, 2002, 12:22:00 PM, you wrote:

Marck Then we should speak there, where a kind soul will be able to give you
Marck the URL to the beta.

Thanks. I am subscribed to the mailing list and have bookmarked the
beta forum.

Marck Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
Marck details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
Marck http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

Found it and found my error (see below).

Marck What, the URL? 'tis there. No problem. Try again. Or do you mean the
Marck beta .rar file?

Got the beta v1.54 build 38 and am now running it. The problem was the
URL for the beta, in the messages I found, pointed to
http://www.ritlabs.com and further to their FTP site. Once I entered
the URL for their FTP site alone I browsed the directory and got the
newest beta version.

Again, thanks for your help. Look forward to testing (and commenting
on g) a product that I registered a few years ago, in it's infancy,
and have been extremely happy since. My thoughts are that it is the
most powerful e-mail program I have ever used (and believe me I have
tried them all!) and co-exists extremely well with my Win2k and XP boxes here.

Thanks again for you help.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

For any problem there is a solution that is simple, quick, and ultimately worse than 
the problem.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6

iQEVAwUAPGSpJGaEPHoZkrdjAQEC8AgAn12N87Kjw96aCk96fz19k86i310jwKPf
8T71ngtCp9j98BTCBIK3pb0OpaP5SLDGJIBgjNemRg+h8OcUhkWrfLW22HDDfV2C
0rC23wUuZvJwRdXYvHRLZ65ah6mAGAmJlizbDu7rUTUEcFJtZUZDjKU47ZG/t79b
ThXHsnA+o4loz3HS4025XLEyVO3KvH3m/TnYEzE33JKTSc+IjUkmGHfqjRestk4e
eB6swZ+jupKaJeDz11Cf5gqoTm5Kr1CZVOhyhJmjQmUVnel5dnzJsEJJaP5FadwN
acF7GDCz8gYb6t0YpTomc0e0XMvW/UI6X5JTs/XteP2KOSbEaA/SLQ==
=6H/d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Beta Team

2002-02-08 Thread DG Raftery Sr.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5

Friday, February 08, 2002
11:49:28 PM
RE: Beta Team

Greetings Nick,

On Friday, February 8, 2002, 12:48:04 PM, you wrote:

Nick What does the above have to do with the subject slight problem when
Nick setting up groups (Mark?)? Please, in the future try not to create a
Nick new message simply by changing the subject of a reply, because your new
Nick message becomes lost within an old thread and will be missed by many
Nick Readers who may have chosen not to read that thread.

Nick It's just good practice to create a brand new message when you change
Nick the Subject. :o)

My fault entirely as I had subscribed to the mailing list and
completely forgot that the messages I receive are part of a threaded
forum and replies, even though it appears to be an e-mail type forum,
are received and threaded to a discussion group.

My fault entirely and again, thank you for pointing out my mistake.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

How an engineer writes a program: Start by debugging an empty file...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6

iQEVAwUAPGSrXWaEPHoZkrdjAQGkVggAqzWEiWEoRgWmHjfKZ+4oLTtanFoTbsXX
hm29Dxa1bho+RykRiPAbTRv3x3AQ1ZT2ej/ddPS2d7ZyL2CR+CHthFDRIAEUfMM5
C3uuKbYLuNQ2Thp26f9NYWMGxRI/hT+0M3G0xj3dLJGSoTsRTO55XgahzTezNvj9
JeqYRO6ml4mcTbgJuL92/DxaRmysKcxr+ZTj0nJJX3/9cIylL6D+8Lp+pY4lHmKp
lVDjkoO/swD/0rJTmFbmYpFhcekPyxK9Lr+4vO39zZkAIn/uhZG2tkZmZxlBXL+b
kP3yMSfHqC765CyijgiutSfu7jQ/YCGx+NlafbQ9dJiz20c+qWr4mA==
=PmOR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Importing Messages (Unix file)

2002-02-08 Thread Dwight A Corrin

On Friday, February 8, 2002, 3:18:36 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

 I just looked at some imports I did when I switched to TB!. They
 all show the correct created time, and all are marked received for
 when they were imported/received by TB!

 Yes, but that only applies to the ones that worked. The set that
 hasn't worked may have a different format of date header... again, a
 sample would be nice...

Not tracking I guess, what exactly do you want a sample of?

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706  fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/36 on Windows XP version 5,1



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




focussing on folder

2002-02-08 Thread Rick Reumann

I've set up a batch file to open up my wife's user account to the Bat.
I'm trying to get it so it will open up on her inbox since that's what
she want's. Since I'm in all different folders when I'm using The Bat,
and don't have her account on my user account, The Bat! doesn't
remember to stay on her inbox. I've been trying to get the command to
work to focus on her inbox but the helpfile example isn't helping
much.
What I have so far is:
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe  /NOLOGO 
/FOCUSU=rachel;F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]\Inbox

I've tried the last F:... part so many ways but nothing seems to work.
I've tried it as
F=rachel
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Inbox
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
F=Inbox

What is that I'm doing wrong? This is the last piece in my multi-user
set up:) I've finally managed to get the network administration of
groups all working (with a LOT of trial and error..the help is REALLY
weak in this area). Suffice it to see, now that it's all working, The
Bat handles multiple users very well... it just 'aint very intuitive
to set up:) I have a macro program (PerfectKeyboard) with nice macros
so with the hit of F12 the batch file is run and wholla..The Bat! is
all ready to go with my wife's accounts all there. Same thing for my
brother's except a different hot key.

If anyone can help getting this focus thing set up, I'd appreciate it.
I'm almost there with the perfect setup.
Later,

--

Rick

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him
is 'God is crying.' And if he asks why God is crying, another cute
thing to tell him is 'Probably because of something you did.'
  -Jack Handey


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com