update - rogue.zip

2004-08-01 Thread pk roy
hi all,
how long it takes to update the rogue.zip
with my pix ?
at
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat

after updating downloaded the file..
but no update

thanks

pk roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

using TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: update - rogue.zip

2004-08-01 Thread Michael Geyer
Hi pk and list,

On Sunday, August 1, 2004 at 13:39:14 GMT +0530 (which was 10:09 where
I live) pk roy wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable
points on the subject of update -  rogue.zip:


 how long it takes to update the rogue.zip
 with my pix ?

Any new roguemoticon has to be approved by a moderator before it will be
in the zip file.

 thanks

 pk roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BTW: You should place a delimiter (dashdashspaceenter) on a
line of its own before your signature lines.

-- 
Regards
Michael

powered by The BAT! 2.12.03
and Useless Macro Collection 1.7.751/rc1
with usual problems of Windows XP  Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Auto wrap problem

2004-08-01 Thread WilWilWil
==Original message text===
From: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wilwilwil on TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, July 31, 2004, 3:12:18 PM
Subject: Auto wrap problem
AM Wilwilwil, [W] wrote:

 The thing I want is a virtual line feed just like in notepad or winword, that go
 on  the next line when the text will go out of the window, but that doesn't edit
 or insert any code of wrap in the text...

 Possible to param TB like that ?

AM Yes. Just switch to using the Plain Text (Windows) editor.


===End of original message text===
Thanks,  it's  really  what  I want. But if I use Plaint Text(Windows) format, I
loose  auto  spell checking with the underline of mistakes. I there a way to have
both ? I know, I want a lot, but that why I use TB ! ;-)

-- 
WilWilWil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TB 2.12.00
Windows XP
Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Oh those smilies are killing me

2004-08-01 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter!
On Saturday, July 31, 2004, 10:21 PM, you wrote:

PB Thanks for the gracious explaination Mary. I'll indeed park it for
PB when I get some spare time.

PB Errr :)?

Err, put a space after the smiley symbol, before the question mark,
like this :) ?

Then the smiley will show for me. The Bat! assumes that you have
written a three-symbol symbol (wow, I hope I'm not turning into a
clanging cymbal, to use St. Paul's words!), when all the time I'm
trying to speak with the tongues of men and of angels. :)

:littleangel:

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
:Mary:
The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Paul Cartwright

Hello Anna,

Saturday, July 31, 2004, 9:34:15 PM, you wrote:


A The error message is message not sent: server reply -- relaying denied.
A Ryan (geek son) looked through the logs, but they were all geek
A (sic) to me. (Sorry, too bad to pass up.)

I get that when I try to send to some ISPs from my personal SMTP server.
I have to send some mail from one specific account that uses my ISP's
SMTP server. I normally use my own SMTP server, Mercury32.
what does the ACCOUNT-PROPERTIES-transport-sendmail section say for a
server? and the AUTHENTICATION section.

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul   



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: testing roguemoticans

2004-08-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Royminoo,

@01-Aug-2004, 10:47 +0530 (01-Aug 06:17 UK time) pk roy said:

... snip
 now posted my pix today on
 http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/account.php successfully added image
 from HDD to my personal vCard can u see me ?

Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header or using
the :trigger: signature format. Of course, the latter also depends
upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
follows a cut mark ;-) .

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgpZdjg5M7W73.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Dan Grunberg
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:54:15 -0700 (4:54 PM EDT here) Anna wrote:

 each time I use TB, I have to do a command prompt in Windows, then
 type in:

 telnet (my server name) 110
 user (my username)
 pass (my password)
 quit

 Then I can send email through TB for a couple of hours. After that,
 I have to do the command lines again. My son tried writing a batch
 file, but he doesn't know how to make it pause and wait for an OK
 signal, then start up again. I haven't written batch files since
 1982 (and only did a couple then).

Try writing a second file with the information you have to type in.

Let's call the information file anna.txt.

Anna.txt might look something like:

   (your server name) 110
   user
   (your user name)
   pass
   (your password)
   quit

Once you store anna.txt , try getting a command prompt and typing:

  telnet  (path to anna.txt)\anna.txt

  

  


 
 






Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.5, MyMacros 1.10
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4



-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: testing roguemoticans

2004-08-01 Thread pk roy
Hello Marck,

 Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
 to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header or using
 the :trigger: signature format. Of course, the latter also depends
 upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
 follows a cut mark ;-) .

 i am trying to follow the instructions by adding X-Rogue header /
 trigger: signature format..

 i am not sure if i would be visible. Before the msg is sent, i.e.
 in the outbox, i am not visible.

 i need some guidance of course i am sure this has been repeated
 no. of times earlier .
 -

pk roy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: testing roguemoticans

2004-08-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Royminoo,

@01-Aug-2004, 23:10 +0530 (01-Aug 18:40 UK time) pk roy said to
Marck:

... snip

 upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
 follows a cut mark ;-) .

  i am trying to follow the instructions by adding X-Rogue header /
  trigger: signature format..

There's no X-Rogue header but the signature worked.

  i am not sure if i would be visible. Before the msg is sent, i.e.
  in the outbox, i am not visible.

Did you download the new version of the rogues after you were
approved? (which was a while after you submitted your image).

... snip

  -

A cut mark is a much simpler affair - just a single line containing
dashdashspacereturn

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgphX6ciGeYzr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: testing roguemoticans

2004-08-01 Thread pk roy
Hello Marck,

 Not yet - you haven't configured a trigger for us to do so. You need
 to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header or using
 the :trigger: signature format. Of course, the latter also depends
 upon you using a conventional signature method where the signature
 follows a cut mark ;-) .

i have probably been able to define the header as X-Rogue correctly
pl. confirm if the pix is visible now.

also, i am not sure as to how is it different from the address book
option of photo and sender photo/prefer photo from address book
available on the header pane.

supposing i am not using the rogueemoticons which is only available
in the current version. what was the  relevance of photo option
of the address book.

pk roy
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

using TB! v2.12.0 W2K SP4



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: testing roguemoticans

2004-08-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Royminoo,

@01-Aug-2004, 23:45 +0530 (01-Aug 19:15 UK time) pk roy said to
Marck:

... snip
 to follow the instructions about adding an X-Rogue header
... snip
 follows a cut mark ;-) .

(which you still seem to be having trouble with!)

 i have probably been able to define the header as X-Rogue correctly
 pl. confirm if the pix is visible now.

Confirmed.

 also, i am not sure as to how is it different from the address
 book option of photo and sender photo/prefer photo from
 address book available on the header pane.

You have to pre-program all possible rogue pictures into
pre-existing entries in your address book. You may not want all the
rogues as entries in your address book. Having the roguemoticons
avoids that.

 supposing i am not using the rogueemoticons which is only available
 in the current version. what was the  relevance of photo option
 of the address book.

Because you may have the photos of people not in the roguemoticons
and the address book link allows another way to see people's faces
in message header panes while reading their messages to you. It's a
mix'n'match option.

 pk roy
 ---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 using TB! v2.12.0 W2K SP4

This is still not working. You need to read up on 'cut marks'.
You'll find good description in the TB Help file in the Creating a
new Message topic.

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgpQM7aMiXHjy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

MyMacros 1.11

2004-08-01 Thread Andrew Perevodchik
Hello!

Missed me? :) MyMacros 1.11 is released.
http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/

What's new:

[+] added %SmartQuotes
[+] added %RegExpReplace, changed behaviour of %RegExp
[+] added %CountAttachments, %OCountAttachments
[*] added new length parameter in %GetLine(text, from,
length)
[-] bugfix in %StrTr, when performing rot-translation
[-] now %Prefix reacts not only on CRLF, but LF as well
[*] added new macros in test mode, %DateToCounter and
%CounterToDate, for date and time calculations
[*] removed %RegExpBlind as a buggy one (couldn't fix)

Jfyi: MyGate development is temporarily suspended, sorry...

-- 
Andrew Perevodchik
Kiev, Ukraine

The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP; MyMacros 1.11
BayesIt! 0.5.5; ajsMacro; MyGate 2.7.0.172



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Anna
Hi, Marck,

MDP Question : Is your account configured as a POP or an IMAP account?

POP.

MDP Have you tried ant of the other authentication methods?

Between us, Ryan and I have tried all of them. I noticed one
thing today though: Under AccountPropertiesTransferSend
Mail, the port listed is 25. Should I change that to 110, which
is the one the ISP told me to use for the workaround?

MDP Relaying is usually an accusation levied when an email's from
MDP address is not that accepted by the server as authentically that of
MDP the account holder .. could that be anything to do with it?

I don't think so. Each account has the correct from name in the
transport stuff (including user names and passwords). Those
should match the account, not necessarily my ISP info, right?

MDP Note: please add a dashdashspacereturn sequence (as you
MDP see before my signature) above your name in your messages to this
MDP list.

Oops. Sorry. I keep forgetting.

-- 
Anna



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Anna,

@1-Aug-2004, 15:23 -0700 (01-Aug 23:23 UK time) Anna said to Marck:

MDP Question : Is your account configured as a POP or an IMAP account?

 POP.

Do you have TB set up to prompt you for the POP password or have you
stored it in TB? If TB is prompting you then maybe the correct
password is not available for TB to use in the POP before SMTP
setting.

MDP Have you tried ant of the other authentication methods?

 Between us, Ryan and I have tried all of them. I noticed one
 thing today though: Under AccountPropertiesTransferSend
 Mail, the port listed is 25. Should I change that to 110, which
 is the one the ISP told me to use for the workaround?

Certainly NOT. Port 25 is the SMTP port. Port 110 is the POP port.
Post Office Protocol (POP) is used to receive mail. Simple Mail
Transfer Protocol (SMTP) is used for sending.

The workaround your ISP gave you was to do a login to the POP server
using your POP credentials before sending messages using standard
SMTP. That is: POP before SMTP authentication. When you say:

telnet (my server name) 110
user (my username)
pass (my password)

Was the username and password any different from the normal username
and password? If they gave you a different set to use for this
purpose, the TB has a space in which to enter them under SMTP
authentication.

Since your ISP has been willing to ascertain that this telnet
workaround was needed, perhaps they will be good enough to explain
to you (and you can relay back to us) why standard POP before SMTP
authentication fails to work for you. I really should.

MDP Relaying is usually an accusation levied when an email's from
MDP address is not that accepted by the server as authentically that of
MDP the account holder .. could that be anything to do with it?

 I don't think so. Each account has the correct from name in the
 transport stuff (including user names and passwords). Those
 should match the account, not necessarily my ISP info, right?

Now you have me confused. Or do you. We're talking about the login
details for your email settings, not the login to your ISP PPP
access (dial-up).

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgpwnrWnr5xUD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Anna
Hi, Marck,

 POP.

MDP Do you have TB set up to prompt you for the POP password or have you
MDP stored it in TB? If TB is prompting you then maybe the correct
MDP password is not available for TB to use in the POP before SMTP
MDP setting.

No, it's stored in TB, and we made sure the password is the
correct one.

MDP Certainly NOT. Port 25 is the SMTP port.

OK. :)

MDP The workaround your ISP gave you was to do a login to the POP server
MDP using your POP credentials before sending messages using standard
MDP SMTP. That is: POP before SMTP authentication. When you say:

MDP telnet (my server name) 110
MDP user (my username)
MDP pass (my password)

MDP Was the username and password any different from the normal username
MDP and password? If they gave you a different set to use for this
MDP purpose, the TB has a space in which to enter them under SMTP
MDP authentication.

We changed the password, but we made sure the new one was entered
correctly in TB. It's the same set as for the normal user name
and password.

MDP Since your ISP has been willing to ascertain that this telnet
MDP workaround was needed, perhaps they will be good enough to explain
MDP to you (and you can relay back to us) why standard POP before SMTP
MDP authentication fails to work for you. I really should.

Ryan's going home tonight, but I'll try to make time
later this week to call and ask them. (The day job will interfere
with that for a few days!)

 I don't think so. Each account has the correct from name in the
 transport stuff (including user names and passwords). Those
 should match the account, not necessarily my ISP info, right?

MDP Now you have me confused. Or do you. We're talking about the login
MDP details for your email settings, not the login to your ISP PPP
MDP access (dial-up).

Sorry--the login details for my email settings and ISP settings
are the same (I have DSL). I have the home account, @qwest.net,
the fastmail account (a Web-based account I have fwded to TB),
and a third forwarded from a Web site.

For each of them, I have TB configured to send through the home
Qwest server, and to retrieve through the respective
accounts, including the respective usernames and passwords.

Is this more clear or am I completely misunderstanding you?

-- 
Anna



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Anna,

@1-Aug-2004, 16:54 -0700 (02-Aug 00:54 UK time) Anna said to Marck:

... snip

MDP Was the username and password any different from the normal
MDP username and password? If they gave you a different set to use
MDP for this purpose, the TB has a space in which to enter them
MDP under SMTP authentication.

 We changed the password, but we made sure the new one was entered
 correctly in TB. It's the same set as for the normal user name
 and password.

If you receive mail and have POP before SMTP enabled then there is
no sensible reason I can come up with for it not working.

MDP Since your ISP has been willing to ascertain that this
MDP telnet workaround was needed, perhaps they will be good
MDP enough to explain to you (and you can relay back to us) why
MDP standard POP before SMTP authentication fails to work for you.
MDP I really should.

 Ryan's going home tonight, but I'll try to make time later this
 week to call and ask them. (The day job will interfere with that
 for a few days!)

You'll have to enable POP before SMTP, attempt a send with that
setting (noting the time of day) then ask your ISP to confirm the
fault from their logs. You might mention that your email software
has a POP before SMTP auth option and that you have it enabled ...
What else should I be doing? kind of query...

... snip

 For each of them, I have TB configured to send through the home
 Qwest server, and to retrieve through the respective
 accounts, including the respective usernames and passwords.

 Is this more clear or am I completely misunderstanding you?

This is more clear. Thank you. The big issue is username and
password during the send operation using the Qwest server. Is the
login / password you are using the same as the login / password for
the Qwest POP account? It should be.

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgptM6ImLlb7o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Can't send mail thru TB

2004-08-01 Thread Anna

MDP You'll have to enable POP before SMTP, attempt a send with that
MDP setting (noting the time of day) then ask your ISP to confirm the
MDP fault from their logs. You might mention that your email software
MDP has a POP before SMTP auth option and that you have it enabled ...
MDP What else should I be doing? kind of query...

Will do! (I'm keeping all these related msgs because I have a
memory like a steel sieve.)

whack

MDP This is more clear. Thank you. The big issue is username and
MDP password during the send operation using the Qwest server. Is the
MDP login / password you are using the same as the login / password for
MDP the Qwest POP account? It should be.

Yes, it is. I've checked those so many times I should be
bug-eyed. :)

I'll let you know what, if anything, the ISP comes up with, and
thanks for your help!

--
Anna



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Sending mail error message

2004-08-01 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello,

  I was trying to send a attachment by email and recieved this error.
  http://tinyurl.com/6qrun
  What does this mean?
  :idunno:

 
-- 
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00

My computer isn't that nervous...it's just a bit ANSI. 


pgpoSgbpDsLdh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: MyMacros 1.11

2004-08-01 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello Andrew,

On Sunday, August 01, 2004 , at 22:37:26[GMT +0300](which was 12:37 PM
where I live) you wrote (at least in part):

AP Hello!

AP Missed me? :) MyMacros 1.11 is released.

The version in The Bat! still lists it as 1.10.

- --
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic



If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
- -
Exploiting The Bat! version 2.12.03
Hamstrung with Windows XP 5.1 (2600)
Scanning with Nod32 anti-virus
Sifting with SpamPal anti-Spam
Hiding behind Outpost Pro Firewall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you

iQA/AwUBQQ2KdG2u7N+Qh+ieEQJvVwCfbvyMFnerKWbvhBnLSEI/oY7ZjZMAn0+E
fGMrjmEy9aN1e3fdM7aE8yKc
=R5yt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyMacros 1.11

2004-08-01 Thread Kevin Amazon
Hi Michael L. Wilson

-
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, at 17:27:25 [GMT -0700] (which was 5:27 PM where I
live) you wrote:


 The version in The Bat! still lists it as 1.10.

Mine shows 1.11

-- 
Best Regards,
Kevin

Using The Bat! v2.12.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





pgpMbyag2XJnY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Oh those smilies are killing me

2004-08-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Mary-

Sunday, August 1, 2004, 3:32:22 AM, you wrote:

MB written a three-symbol symbol

Is that a TSS? Sorry... I'm being a bit symbol-minded today...

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Compressing folders

2004-08-01 Thread Jack
Hello,

 I'm just curious of which method of compression is used in The Bat!
 when you check the compress folder in folder properties. Is it a
 huge spacesaver and does it have a negative impact when using the
 program?

ASK The term compression may be misleading.

Since this subject came up, can you (anyone) explain why there isn't
an option to automatically compress and purge (other than when
quitting)?  It would seem a trivial thing to have an option that would
do them both on a scheduled basis.  I leave TB up all of the time
so I have to keep remembering that I need to go in do that every once
in a while.

-- 
Jack



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Compressing folders

2004-08-01 Thread Wolffe
On Sunday, August 01, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:

J Since this subject came up, can you (anyone) explain why there isn't
J an option to automatically compress and purge (other than when
J quitting)?

There is ... Folder-Maintenance



-- 
Cheers Yall
\\'

Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyMacros 1.11

2004-08-01 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello Kevin,

On Sunday, August 01, 2004 , at 17:35:43[GMT -0700](which was 5:35 PM
where I live) you wrote (at least in part):


KA Mine shows 1.11

 I figured it out.  It's all good.




- --
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic



If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
- -
Exploiting The Bat! version 2.12.03
Hamstrung with Windows XP 5.1 (2600)
Scanning with Nod32 anti-virus
Sifting with SpamPal anti-Spam
Hiding behind Outpost Pro Firewall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you

iQA/AwUBQQ3Ni22u7N+Qh+ieEQLimwCfcM5UsNq9/VaOnKGq/ssnlnhBKcgAoJas
VZoZVDtdNaTNxqDG6RhptLdW
=2J0z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Compressing folders

2004-08-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Wolffe,

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W There is ... Folder-Maintenance

But I think Jack wants an automatic capability whereas the above is
still a manual action. I don't think it can be put into the scheduler -
at least I can't see how it can be so it would be nice to be put right.

- --

Regards,

Richard

| Using The Bat! 2.12.03  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: 

iQA/AwUBQQ3VwxqZtcDKk7W+EQJo6ACgoKlPyY+Ly0pAzK5zFFMse/9HNpoAn2x3
8Z7WAch86Vns2VSz/O/ew4rH
=rDlb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html