Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Some time around 08/03/2004 01:22:50, I think I heard Michael L. Wilson say: ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 45 Total Clean Emails: 120 BayesIT guessed right 99.96% of the time My email is 2.67% spam = Your email is only 2.67% spam?? You lucky daaag!!! :) dZ. -- Powered by The Bat! v.2.12.00, Hindered by MS Windows 2000 v.5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
ON Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 7:22:50 AM, you wrote: MLW I have been playing with BayesIT macros to create statistics on the MLW bottom of this email. If there is interest, I will post what I did. MLW If anyone else is using the macros for stats, please show results MLW here. Hi Michael, I ma not using them right now but I am stll interested in your implementation, so please post it here. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= In case of a thunderstorm, stand in the middle of the fairway and hold up a one iron. Not even God can hit a one iron. Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Junk messages as unread?
Hello! Is it possible to have all messages classified by BeyesIt! as junk be marked as unread when they get to the Junk folder? Just to make sure I do not overlook the legitimate mail. -- Warm regards, -=Robert Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~~ PGP key request: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Embedded ~~ The Bat! v2.12.00 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 pgpaKwXDVClHw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
On Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 6:22:50 AM, Michael L. Wilson wrote: I have been playing with BayesIT macros to create statistics on the bottom of this email. Don't forget that Netiquette dictates that the length of the sig should be 4-5 lines maximum. The length of your sig, particularly once you have added BayesIT data, is well in excess of this. Users of TB! and the RTV may not notice this, but not everyone uses TB!, and these unfortunate people will see many lines of sig, which they will have to manually chop in replies. Julian -- Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
No way to quit CC after broken connection!?
Hello everybody, We're experiencing some annoying behaviour with TB!. One of them is the Connection Centre stalling the complete PC when during mail exchange the connection gets broken - which happens quite often when connecting thru a mobile phone at 9k6 bps from some obscure corner of the covered world Is there any way to correct or work around this? -- Happy flappin'! Corne' (aka Cory, The Batdmin) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Junk messages as unread?
Hello Robert, On 3 Aug 2004 at 13:49:42 +0300 GMT [12:49 CEST] you wrote: RG Is it possible to have all messages classified by BeyesIt! as junk RG be marked as unread when they get to the Junk folder? Just to make RG sure I do not overlook the legitimate mail. Preferences-Antispam-untick Mark stored junk mail read -- Cheers, Andre It's the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance. It is the dream afraid of waking that never takes the chance. It is the one who won't be taken who cannot seem to give. And the soul afraid of dying that never learns to live. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Emptying ALL Trash Folders
Hello Joseph, On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 01:11:09 + (UTC) GMT (03/08/2004, 08:11 +0700 GMT), Joseph N. wrote: JN I seem to recall some threads in the past about incorporating a way JN to empty all trash folders with one global object. I cannot find it. JN Was it ever implemented? No, I don't think so. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. You know that little indestructible black box that is used on planes; why can't they make the whole plane out of the same substance ? Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
hi all, have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location using thebat v2.12, the images are not visible there though same rogue.zip is properly installed.. what could be the probable reasons ? with best regards -- pk roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- :[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it from? -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 On a clear disk you can seek forever. pgpifmk6TWOGV.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: (no subject)
Hello Darrin, receiving is v2.12.0 Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 8:41:30 PM, you wrote: Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it from? pk roy --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] using TB! v2.12.0 W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: BayesIT Macros
Hello Michael, Monday, August 2, 2004, 9:35:22 PM, you wrote: MLW -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MLW Hash: SHA1 MLW Hello Peter, MLW On Monday, August 02, 2004 , at 17:50:57[GMT -0400](which was 2:50 PM MLW where I live) you wrote (at least in part): ---cut-- PK Hello Michael, PK TIA MLW I am using 0.5.9, but my memory indicates that these macros have been MLW there all along. I found them listed at the bottom of the MLW information page on the BayesIT macro (open the plug-in window, MLW highlight bayesIT and click information. MLW There is no explanation, just a list of macro names. Thank you. I never looked into *Information*. -- Best regards, Peter Kerekes (Toronto, Canada) I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde TB! v2.12.03 and BayesIt! 0.5.5 on Windows 20005.0.2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Zonnet, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 11:32:07[GMT +0200](which was 2:32 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): Z ON Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 7:22:50 AM, you wrote: MLW I have been playing with BayesIT macros to create statistics on the MLW bottom of this email. If there is interest, I will post what I did. MLW If anyone else is using the macros for stats, please show results MLW here. Z Hi Michael, Z I ma not using them right now but I am stll interested in your Z implementation, so please post it here. QT SpamCount= ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24) BayesIT guessed right %calculate=100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(24)/%STATSPAMLETTERS(24))%% of the time My email is %calculate=%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24)/%STATSPAMLETTERS(24)%% spam = - --end--- - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - Exploiting The Bat! version 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 Hamstrung with Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Scanning with Nod32 anti-virus Hiding behind Outpost Pro Firewall ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 74 Total Clean Emails: 176 BayesIT guessed right 99.972973% of the time My email is 2.378378% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ+zUm2u7N+Qh+ieEQI9eACfZ4UfKDE2fc1vPqR2vM7l+a2vxLYAoPUF gaKg9X0X7omZYoqrKXip9y7+ =zyxp -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Julian, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 12:04:55[GMT +0100](which was 4:04 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): JBL On Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 6:22:50 AM, Michael L. Wilson wrote: I have been playing with BayesIT macros to create statistics on the bottom of this email. JBL Don't forget that Netiquette dictates that the length of the sig JBL should be 4-5 lines maximum. The length of your sig, particularly once JBL you have added BayesIT data, is well in excess of this. JBL Users of TB! and the RTV may not notice this, but not everyone uses JBL TB!, and these unfortunate people will see many lines of sig, which JBL they will have to manually chop in replies. JBL Julian Sorry you misunderstood. The Bat! allows me to have different templates to have different sigs for each send address. I have created a rather long sig for the bat discussion groups to display what my system is. The spam counter is also, only in the template for the Bat lists. You should look into The Bat! templates, they really are quite good and help in the world Netiquette. It is also my belief, that everyone on this list either uses The Bat! or knows of it. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - Exploiting The Bat! version 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 Hamstrung with Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Scanning with Nod32 anti-virus Hiding behind Outpost Pro Firewall ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 74 Total Clean Emails: 176 BayesIT guessed right 99.972973% of the time My email is 2.378378% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ+z722u7N+Qh+ieEQLHhQCcCm0Yo+z3OzGgHkT7R33n8iiB95MAn0Re RY9JVt0LBxpn39sQ5EKe7sJ/ =UnW5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How to setup a filter to send back reply automatically?
Hello, I upload files to a website weekly. I have a template made up that I send to notify the organization when the files have been uploaded. They then send me a reply email, which I would then like to send a automated response to when I receive this email. The email they reply to which is from my template, has the same subject line everytime. So Im thinking that there must be a way to set up a filter to send automatic reply to a email with a example RE: Specific Subject in the subject line. Im unsure how to set this up. Anyone have some ideas? -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 Do files get embarrassed when they get unzipped? pgpJI5q5G7mVE.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Michael- Do post what you came up with here - that's *very* interesting. However, I should point out that since your cutline is incorrect and your message is roughly 80% signature lines I smell a trout hovering quite close nearby. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to setup a filter to send back reply automatically?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:17:23 -0700 (12:17 PM EDT here) Darrin Rich wrote: Hello, I upload files to a website weekly. I have a template made up that I send to notify the organization when the files have been uploaded. They then send me a reply email, which I would then like to send a automated response to when I receive this email. The email they reply to which is from my template, has the same subject line everytime. So Im thinking that there must be a way to set up a filter to send automatic reply to a email with a example RE: Specific Subject in the subject line. Im unsure how to set this up. Anyone have some ideas? TheBat! Account Sorting Office New Filter Rule tab String [Re: your message subject] Location [Subject] Presence [Yes] Action tab (pull down to and check off) [x] Send Auto Reply press the icon on your right to customize the auto reply Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.5, MyMacros 1.11 Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to setup a filter to send back reply automatically?
Hello Darrin Rich, 03-Aug-2004 18:17, you wrote: Anyone have some ideas? The Sorting Office's Action tab is very large... and while it is arguable what quality of UI design *scrollable* tabs are, you can find exactly what you're looking for there: an Action create auto-reply (halfway down or so). Set the checkbox, click the button to open the template window, type your reply, hey presto. -- Best regards, Alexander The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular? -- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to setup a filter to send back reply automatically?
Hi Dan, On 8/3/2004 10:32 AM my time, Dan wrote: DG TheBat! DG Account DG Sorting Office DG New Filter DGRule tab DG String [Re: your message subject] DG Location [Subject] DG Presence [Yes] DGAction tab DG (pull down to and check off) [x] Send Auto Reply DG press the icon on your right to customize the auto reply Wonderful! It worked great. Thanks for taking the time to post the steps. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 Life would be much easier if I had the source code. pgpZKMeocYM55.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello, Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? Just curious about how it works with TB!. Good and bad experiences. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 From C:\*.* to shining C:\*.* pgpEFWSV85WdO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Kaspersky AV Plug-in.
Hi Chris, On Thursday, July 29, 2004 19:26 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote; CW I'm currently using TB! 2.12.03 with the Kaspersky 4.5 Pro as my AV. CW Every now and again, the plug-in errors, so I have to remove the plug-in CW and then add it again!? Don't ask me why, but 9 times out of 10, it CW works. CW Well, it came to one of those re-start times today and when I select CW 'Add', it no longer gives me the choice to add KAV!? CW Instead, it comes up with the option to browse for a *.bav, which CW doesn't exist for KAV. CW Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can correct it, as I CW feel slightly vulnerable at the moment (I don't 'always' trust my common CW sense :-) ) CW Here's hoping someone can help! :D Anyone? 9Val? -- Regards, Chris Created using The Bat! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Math in The Bat! Macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings All, I am trying to complete the following calculation 100*(x/x+y) x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 Using a calculator, I get 29.389 I cannot get this value using The Bat! %calc macro or anything else. How do I do this kind of math in a The Bat! Macro? - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: Big Brother is watching - George Orwell (1984) - Exploiting The Bat! version 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 Hamstrung with Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Scanning with Nod32 anti-virus Hiding behind Outpost Pro Firewall Ponder this: Too much sunshine makes a desert. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ/ceG2u7N+Qh+ieEQISGwCg/22f/+BP0qldaMuVlIj+G3Tn2VIAn2OY cepHx2oqkL1ZeIqPGMUANhg/ =HY1A -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Darrin, Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 2:34:45 PM, you wrote: DR Hello, DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? Just curious about how it DR works with TB!. Good and bad experiences. Works Fine for me on 4.1.7.5 -- Best regards, dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Darrin! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 1:34 PM, you wrote: DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? ... I used MailWasher Pro before I ever got The Bat! I still have it on my machine, but it's only as a back-up in case anything (I hope nothing and never) should cause me to have to go back to Outlook Express temporarily. I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hi Mary, On 8/3/2004 12:43 PM my time, Mary wrote: MB I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I MB don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do MB everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself. Thanks for the input. I havent installed it myself, so Im unaware of its features. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking? pgpIoJsY17ZTu.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Darrin! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 2:55 PM, you wrote: MB I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. ... DR Thanks for the input. I havent installed it myself, so Im unaware of DR its features. Basically MailWasher lets you manage your POP3 mail on the server. The Bat! also has that capability. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hi Mary, On 8/3/2004 1:06 PM my time, Mary wrote: MB Basically MailWasher lets you manage your POP3 mail on the server. The MB Bat! also has that capability. Ok, I see. Thanks for clearing that up. Save me a download there :p -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 Stack Overflow: Too many pancakes... pgpp8WLUtHz6i.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
On Wed 4 August 2004, 4:41:53 +1000, Michael L. Wilson wrote: I am trying to complete the following calculation 100*(x/x+y) x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 Using a calculator, I get 29.389 I cannot get this value using The Bat! %calc macro or anything else. How do I do this kind of math in a The Bat! Macro? I got that result. Tested it with the following macro %_Sum=%Calc(77+185)%- %_Sum %_Quot=%Calc(77/%_sum)%- %_Quot %_Percent=%calc(100*%_quot)%- %_Percent -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu) No of SETI units returned: 306 Processing time: 1 years, 252 days, 11 hours. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 10:24:54[GMT -0700](which was 10:24 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): MW Michael- MW Do post what you came up with here - that's *very* interesting. MW However, I should point out that since your cutline is incorrect and MW your message is roughly 80% signature lines I smell a trout hovering MW quite close nearby. My cutline is exactly like they want it. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 86 Total Clean Emails: 202 BayesIT guessed right 99.976744% of the time My email is 26.7361% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ/3a22u7N+Qh+ieEQL43ACfeTYpFQ412V/7VCT23rriYOo9vwkAn36e wkk5peAtB2YphIMH9YNqmoBz =drMA -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Zonnet, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 11:32:07[GMT +0200](which was 2:32 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): Z I ma not using them right now but I am stll interested in your Z implementation, so please post it here. After some help with the macros, this is what I have now ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24) BayesIT guessed right %calculate=100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(24)/%STATSPAMLETTERS(24))%% of the time My email is %_Sum=%Calc(%STATSPAMLETTERS(24)+%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24))%- %_Quot=%Calc(77/%_sum)%- %_Percent=%calc(100*%_quot)%- %_Percent%% spam = - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 86 Total Clean Emails: 202 BayesIT guessed right 99.976744% of the time My email is 26.7361% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ/3sW2u7N+Qh+ieEQJ8LgCgkx+Ka35xjyrqfEXX0q6s4jw4K4oAoJ9p Hvskj+t/ldRDQzBSAre2A+9r =bPaF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 10:24:54[GMT -0700](which was 10:24 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): MW Michael- MW Do post what you came up with here - that's *very* interesting. MW However, I should point out that since your cutline is incorrect and MW your message is roughly 80% signature lines I smell a trout hovering MW quite close nearby. I am using %CutHere from MyMacros. I was told it was perfect. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 86 Total Clean Emails: 202 BayesIT guessed right 99.976744% of the time My email is 26.7361% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQQ/4MW2u7N+Qh+ieEQJBLQCg2aPg57zV0WgtAjTSkIrMe4LZwQAAn22x /Wx8ppzM7uCWB3OkhXDMcIDI =WJFs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hi Michael, My cutline is exactly like they want it. I see a dash space dash dash it should be dash dash space :) Oh wait, here's one coming now: -- Chris Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Michael! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 3:40 PM, you wrote: MLW I am using %CutHere from MyMacros. I was told it was perfect. It's the best that can be done, since you are signing with PGP/Mime. This changes the configuration as it's sent to: dash space dash dash. Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for quoting are in a person's template. This was such a problem for some of us that Marck wrote an expression that one can include in one's Address Book Reply template which will recognize dash space dash dash in addition to dash-dash-space as a cut-mark, and exclude all text below it from the quotes in Reply. I hope I'm saying this clearly. I'd post the expression here, but my template is long and I don't know what part of it does that. I just know that it makes your cut-mark work for me. For someone without that, your cut-mark as changed by PGP/Mime won't work. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Michael, Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 1:36:52 PM, you wrote: My cutline is exactly like they want it. Yes and it works fine here! -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hi Mary, This changes the configuration as it's sent to: dash space dash dash. Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for quoting are in a person's template. That answered my next question, which was why the dash space dash dash delimiter works. Thanks! -- Chris Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Mary, Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 1:52:49 PM, you wrote: Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for quoting are in a person's template. What am I missing? I use macros for quoting but nothing below Michael's cutline is quoted. ~shrug~ -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Terry! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 4:05 PM, you wrote: MB Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for MB quoting are in a person's template. TGM What am I missing? I use macros for quoting but nothing below TGM Michael's cutline is quoted. ~shrug~ My templates are very old, from when I first got The Bat! I had a simple % quote line. A number of us did, I think. So when people began signing with PGP/Mime, that would change the basic delimiter of dash dash space (Enter, for new line) to what you see as Michael's cut-line: dash space dash dash. And it didn't work, since the set-up was for dash-dash space.. So Marck gave me an expression to put in my Reply template. It recognizes the PGP/Mime configured cut-line, which is what Michael has. I imagine that this expression, or something like it, is in the Macro that you are using. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Terry, On 3 Aug 2004 at 14:05:45 -0700 GMT [23:05 CEST] you wrote: Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for quoting are in a person's template. TGM What am I missing? I use macros for quoting but nothing below TGM Michael's cutline is quoted. ~shrug~ Since some versions tb! supports pgp changed sig delimiters. Therefore it works. -- Cheers, Andre Who the hell wants to hear actors talk? ~ Harry Warner of Warner Brothers, 1925 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hi Mary and list, On Tuesday, August 3, 2004 at 15:52:49 GMT -0500 (which was 22:52 where I live) Mary Bull wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of Playing with BayesIT macros: MLW I am using %CutHere from MyMacros. I was told it was perfect. It is as correct as a handmade can be too. There is also a TB! macro %ISSGINATURE (in a QT)which should care about a cut delimiter too (I didn't try that one myself). It's the best that can be done, since you are signing with PGP/Mime. To be exact: not PGP/MIME but PGP inline. With PGP/MIME there is no need for changing lines beginning with dash as the seperation is done by different (MIME coded) parts. This changes the configuration as it's sent to: dash space dash dash. Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, That is not true anymore, I was recently told. Since a couple of versions ago TB! recognizes the dashspacedashdashspace mofification of PGP as a valid signature itself. This was such a problem for some of us that Marck wrote an expression that one can include in one's Address Book Reply template which will recognize dash space dash dash in addition to dash-dash-space as a cut-mark, and exclude all text below it from the quotes in Reply. Since then this macro isn't needed anymore for the sig delimiter. One positive side effect is suppressing the _beginning PGP-line too. I just know that it makes your cut-mark work for me. For someone without that, your cut-mark as changed by PGP/Mime won't work. see above :-) -- Regards Michael powered by The BAT! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1, Useless Macro Collection 1.7.751/rc1, and MyMacros 1.11 with usual problems of Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hello Andre! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 4:16 PM, you wrote: MB Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for MB quoting are in a person's template. TGM What am I missing? I use macros for quoting but nothing below TGM Michael's cutline is quoted. ~shrug~ AW Since some versions tb! supports pgp changed sig delimiters. Therefore AW it works. If TB! is doing this automatically, why does it work for the TB! lists, but not on tbot, where, when I made some changes, I inadvertently left that expression out of my tbot Reply template, and now I have to manually scrub tons of Yahoo! stuff, unless I highlight and use Shift/Reply arrow button? -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
%smartquote in MyMacro 1.11 erases quoted text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings All, I have been trying the %smartquote from the latest MYMacros 1.11. It seems to do nothing by erase the text that should be quoted. Anyone using it successfully? - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: Big Brother is watching - George Orwell (1984) - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Ponder this: A little bit of pain never hurt anyone ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 98 Total Clean Emails: 143 BayesIT guessed right 99.969388% of the time My email is 31.9502% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQRAEg22u7N+Qh+ieEQLMBACgs7fsp/Ifg8fCm+HnE5T8/p+cPxoAn2Pj t+H7LGqfjZYFZs9+HTrnGVRg =pXxh -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
Hi Mary and list, On Tuesday, August 3, 2004 at 16:23:51 GMT -0500 (which was 23:23 where I live) Mary Bull wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of Playing with BayesIT macros: AW Since some versions tb! supports pgp changed sig delimiters. Therefore AW it works. If TB! is doing this automatically, why does it work for the TB! lists, but not on tbot, where, when I made some changes, I inadvertently left that expression out of my tbot Reply template, Hmm - may be we should have a look at your templates (you could send them per PM if you so wish). I do not use any special cleaning macros and as all templates for the tb-lists (including tbot) are AB-Group templates they are exactly the same for each TB-List - and the cut off works automagically. -- Regards Michael powered by The BAT! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1, Useless Macro Collection 1.7.751/rc1, and MyMacros 1.11 with usual problems of Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hi Simon, On 8/3/2004 2:48 PM my time, Simon wrote: SF Mailwasher [4.1.7.5] not only checks the mail on the server [POP or SF IMAP] but also has White/Blacklist, Bayesian Filtering/Learning, SF Blacklist (e.g. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) checking and lastly their own SF Spam Altert service titled First Alert which is a £3.50 (UK Pounds)a SF year subscription service contianing details of known and identified SF Spam. Many features. I might have to download a trial version to see it. Can Domains be deleted from server just using TB! by itself? I know I can delete specific senders. SF I've had superb 99.9% results with K9, but, I'm running Mailwasher SF right now and can vouch for it's Spam detection abilities too Ive also experimented with K9. Very pleased with the spam detection. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow. pgpIzdmGOyYME.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Darrin wrote: DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? ... Mary replied: I ran MailWasher Pro with The Bat! for awhile. No problems. But I don't do that any more. It's redundant, in my opinion--I can do everything that MailWasher does using The Bat! all by itself. I use MailWasher and The Bat, successfully, too. However, I find Mary's comment interesting in that I use MW to look at my mail on the server and delete it there: saves me having to download 100+ spam messages needlessly. I take it, Mary, that you aren't bothered about downloading spam? (Not that this is an implied criticism, note!) Best wishes, Iain. -- Iain Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Simon, SF Mailwasher [4.1.7.5] not only checks the mail on the server [POP SF or IMAP] but also has White/Blacklist, Bayesian SF Filtering/Learning, Blacklist (e.g. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) checking SF and lastly their own Spam Altert service titled First Alert SF which is a £3.50 (UK Pounds)a year subscription service contianing SF details of known and identified Spam. SF I've had superb 99.9% results with K9, but, I'm running Mailwasher SF right now and can vouch for it's Spam detection abilities too And I can second that. It's worth the money for the First Alert system alone where thousands of users are reporting spam back to a central server. The upshot is that most of the spam I get is already marked Known Spam and deleted before it even gets to the Bat. Using Mailwasher, hardly any spam at all gets through and most of it is marked deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher. It's much more effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using the Bat. -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Iain! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 4:58 PM, you wrote: IDB I use MailWasher and The Bat, successfully, too. However, I find IDB Mary's comment interesting in that I use MW to look at my mail on IDB the server and delete it there: saves me having to download 100+ IDB spam messages needlessly. That's what I do with The Bat!'s Dispatcher--I look at each mail's headers and manually mark for download the ones I want. The rest are deleted on the server. IDB I take it, Mary, that you aren't bothered about downloading spam? I never download Spam. Admittedly, I am lucky, I get offered, at most, one or two Spams a day. This week Ive been offered three of those lists of nonsense words, which I understand are an attempt at propagating an e-mail virus. The needs of business users and people who get more mail than I do may be different. On principle, I am against blacklists and bouncing mail. I think the best course is to simply delete unwanted mail. I can't remember an unwanted advertisement getting through to me since my latest change of address (to go on broadband). And before that it was a rare occasion to receive Spam here. (I like to get Amazon's announcements that they've shipped my books or DVDS. :) ) -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hi malexander, On 8/3/2004 2:59 PM my time, malexander wrote: m And I can second that. It's worth the money for the First Alert m system alone where thousands of users are reporting spam back to a m central server. The upshot is that most of the spam I get is already m marked Known Spam and deleted before it even gets to the Bat. Using m Mailwasher, hardly any spam at all gets through and most of it is m marked deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher. It's much more m effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using the Bat. Thanks. I have a better understanding of the first alert now. Im going to read up on it a bit more at the website. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the process of putting them in. pgpqBPg1PeF9H.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 5:59:50 PM, malexander wrote: malexander And I can second that. It's worth the money for the First malexander Alert system alone where thousands of users are reporting malexander spam back to a central server. The upshot is that most of malexander the spam I get is already marked Known Spam and deleted malexander before it even gets to the Bat. Using Mailwasher, hardly malexander any spam at all gets through and most of it is marked malexander deletion when it arrives in Mailwasher. It's much more malexander effective, as far as I'm concerned, than filtering using malexander the Bat. Bellsouth is my ISP and I use their mail servers and their MailGard option. So far it has caught almost all of the spam that shows up in my mailbox. Maybe one a day gets through. Out of 350 spam messages in three days only one made it to TheBat!, knock on wood (as he raps himself beside the head with his knuckles). The rest were dealt with on the server by MailGard where I have the option of viewing them to make sure none were really ham or letting the process delete them automatically. I have no idea what MailGard is, but it works. I tried BayesFilters and BayesIt out of curiosity for a while, but they were much more work and no better than the filter provided by Bellsouth. -- Regards, Plan9 Two strings walk into a bar. The first string says to the bartender: Bartender, I'll have a beer. u.5n$x5t?*4ru!2[sACC~ErJ. The second string says: Pardon my friend, he isn't NULL terminated. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
MicroEd format problems
G'day tbudl, I've switched to using MicroEd as my composition editor, and I'm slowly getting used to the revolting look of non-proportional fonts. But I've got a format problem. If I want to produce a list of items like this: Item Item Item It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING in it, because if I do, it immediately moves to: Item Item Item I've played with various settings, but haven't fixed it. I'm sure it's something simple. Any ideas? TIA. -- cheers, Mic (return address works) Say what you will about the Ten Commandments, you must always come back to the pleasant fact that there are only ten of them. H. L. Mencken Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd format problems
Dear Mic, @4-Aug-2004, 06:45 +0800 (03-Aug 23:45 UK time) M i c C u l l e n said to tbudl: ... snip But I've got a format problem. If I want to produce a list of items like this: Item Item Item It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING in it, because if I do, it immediately moves to: Item Item Item Auto-format is your enemy here. Learn the toggle (Ctrl-Shift-F is the default) and kick it in and out as needed. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user TB! v2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgpCSsbpL0lDx.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
ON Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 8:41:53 PM, you wrote: MLW I am trying to complete the following calculation MLW 100*(x/x+y) MLW x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 MLW y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 MLW Using a calculator, I get 29.389 MLW I cannot get this value using The Bat! %calc macro or anything else. MLW How do I do this kind of math in a The Bat! Macro? Hi Michael, Do you get 186 as a result? If so TB! is working left to right without respect for the rules. Try this if possible 100*(x/(x+y)). This should force the X+Y to be done before the X/(x+Y) Hope this helps, I have no time to test it for you. Also thanks for posting your statistics template. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Things That Sound Dirty At Golf But Aren't: Nuts...my shaft is bent Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd format problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello M, On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MicCullen But I've got a format problem. If I want to MicCullen produce a list of items like this: MicCullen Item MicCullen Item MicCullen Item MicCullen It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING MicCullen in it, because if I do, it MicCullen immediately moves to: MicCullen Item Item Item Down at the bottom of the editor are some icons. Deselect the second and third ( Auto-format and auto-wrap) and that should do it nicely for you. - -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.12.03 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBQRAZExqZtcDKk7W+EQITxQCeO9CW3lqHKk14GDllDqCkhAa4cdoAoNMV 6SqAgNtd6ZHdHZeXAbCnOavR =T2GE -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd format problems
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:49:23 GMT, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Item Item Item Auto-format is your enemy here. Learn the toggle (Ctrl-Shift-F is the default) and kick it in and out as needed. There are times, however, when you'll want to keep the auto- formatting going but still avoid the Item Item Item problem. Best way to deal with that is, before editing in one of the list paragraphs, add an extra paragraph on either side to isolate it from the accompanying paragraphs. Then, auto-formatting will keep your paragraph tidy as you edit, and, when you're done, just delete the two hidden paragraph marks. -- JN Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd format problems
On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 @ 6:49:23 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: [snips] But I've got a format problem. If I want to produce a list of items like this: Item Item Item It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING in it, because if I do, it immediately moves to: Item Item Item Marck Auto-format is your enemy here. Learn the toggle (Ctrl-Shift-F is Marck the default) and kick it in and out as needed. Thanks for that, people. I'd changed that in the preferences, but maybe it doesn't work if you change it there when the message is already open? -- cheers, Mic (reply address works) Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. Robert Frost Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
On Tue 3-Aug-04 1:41pm -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote: I am trying to complete the following calculation 100*(x/x+y) x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 Using a calculator, I get 29.389 You appear to be abusing your calculator :-) The correct answer, assuming normal precedence, is 18,600. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Math in The Bat! Macros
Hello Bill, Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 4:37:11 PM, you wrote: The correct answer, assuming normal precedence, is 18,600. I will second that ;-) -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hi, Darrin, DR Any users of Mailwasher Pro with TB! here? Just curious about how it DR works with TB!. Good and bad experiences. I'm using the earlier free Mailwasher with TB (I haven't upgraded because the free version does all I want it to do). It worked seamlessly until recently, when I started having the send-mail problems I've been complaining about for days. It still works well, but there are a couple of glitches I can't seem to get rid of. For me, being able to delete suspect messages from the server and not even download them is a big plus. :) -- Anna Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Anna! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 6:44 PM, you wrote: A For me, being able to delete suspect messages from the server and A not even download them is a big plus. :) That is exactly what The Bat!'s Message Dispatcher lets me do. :) -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mailwasher Pro Thebat
Hello Ian! On Tuesday, August 03, 2004, 7:55 PM, you wrote: MB That is exactly what The Bat!'s Message Dispatcher lets me do. :) IAW The problem with the Message Dispatcher is that it does not classify IAW the messages based on the filters. Mailwasher does and by sorting on IAW the status, the filtered messages are grouped ... I see. As I wrote in an earlier post, my method will probably not suit many people. I like to look at my messages chronologically. And I like to examine the headers on each one. Then I decide what to download and what to delete. Most of my mail is from the three TB! lists I'm subscribed to, plus tbot, plus a scattering of mail from family and personal friends. It's rare for me to have more than 100 mails at a time to look at--usually it's 20 to 50. It is rare for me to see a Spam or a suspicious virus-trojan looking mail among them. I have the time and the inclination to do it this way. I'm most grateful that The Bat! affords me this capability. When I get my mail filtered to its various folders, I still don't read by threads. I read the mail in each folder chronologically, oldest to latest. But that's just me. Everyone else's mileage obviously varies. And that's the beauty of The Bat!--it's so flexible, to meet a variety of different needs, and it works well with so many other good programs, like MailWasher. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
emoticons not visible
hi all, have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location using thebat v2.12 at both sending/receiving end. while i can see my image in my outbox but at the other end the images are not visible there rogue.zip is properly installed.. has it anything to do with the tb with best regards -- pk roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- :[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Playing with BayesIT macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Julian, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 12:04:55[GMT +0100](which was 4:04 AM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): JBL Don't forget that Netiquette dictates that the length of the sig JBL should be 4-5 lines maximum. The length of your sig, particularly once JBL you have added BayesIT data, is well in excess of this. I take this view. If people do not want long signatures, then stop writing so many F*ing macros. I like to play with the macros and test them, and now you complain about my sig being too long. oh well. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 95 Total Clean Emails: 139 BayesIT guessed right 99.936842% of the time My email is 32.906% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQRBF622u7N+Qh+ieEQLzJwCg+iIHutcXR69LqQ3GkiVPHaZBUs4AoNcm pgyeicBz77iHUlwva6IHMgWM =hT1a -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
BayesIT not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL, I think my BayesIT not working. Must be not configured correctly. How do u configure BayesIT and how to confirm it's working or not ? Thanks in advance for your feedbacks. Below are the logs:- --- New session log Version of BayesIt!: 0.5.5 Beginning the loading process of training information. Recalculating bases from here: 00:00:00 C:\Program Files\The Bat!\BayesIt\base\spamdict.bye 00:00:06 C:\Program Files\The Bat!\BayesIt\base\nspamdict.bye Spam frequency dictionary: Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost. 00:00:00 Non-spam frequency dictionary: Size: 218 letters. Capacity: 34037 words. Regarding base didn't load. Continue in training mode... Beginning the loading process of training information. Recalculating bases from here: 00:00:00 C:\Program Files\The Bat!\BayesIt\base\spamdict.bye 00:00:06 C:\Program Files\The Bat!\BayesIt\base\nspamdict.bye Spam frequency dictionary: Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost. 00:00:00 Non-spam frequency dictionary: Size: 219 letters. Capacity: 34169 words. Regarding base didn't load. Continue in training mode... - -- Best regards, omn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kajang, Malaysia -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBQQ/YBhXNncAC76p3EQKQugCgyPKYMk8J+QBjva5ZmTOPwpIzxn8AoOYz wtU9DvQnIa6TzUHmwTDCAQAo =zyfN -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ian, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 13:34:25[GMT +1000](which was 8:34 PM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): IAW Michael, IAW On Wednesday, August 4, 2004, 4:41:53 AM, you (Michael L. Wilson) wrote: MLW -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MLW Hash: SHA1 MLW Greetings All, MLW I am trying to complete the following calculation MLW 100*(x/x+y) MLW x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 MLW y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 MLW Using a calculator, I get 29.389 MLW I cannot get this value using The Bat! %calc macro or anything else. MLW How do I do this kind of math in a The Bat! Macro? IAW It depends on what you are trying to calculate. IAW If you want to divide x by the sum of x+y then you need to bracket the IAW x+y as in x/(x+y) otherwise it is just x/x to which y is added. In IAW other words, you are multiplying 100 by 1 plus the value of y. Actually, it does not work unless I use the undocumented %sum() macro. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 99 Total Clean Emails: 142 BayesIT guessed right 99.939394% of the time My email is 31.9502% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQRBZwW2u7N+Qh+ieEQLmrgCfTmMlEEf5pyDQUR1hjAWNeICzuYYAoKLL nKjzoQrqft950I8Ja7nBar4t =457n -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
On Wed 4 August 2004, 13:36:31 +1000, Michael L. Wilson wrote: MLW I am trying to complete the following calculation MLW 100*(x/x+y) MLW x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77 MLW y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185 MLW Using a calculator, I get 29.389 MLW I cannot get this value using The Bat! %calc macro or anything else. MLW How do I do this kind of math in a The Bat! Macro? IAW It depends on what you are trying to calculate. IAW If you want to divide x by the sum of x+y then you need to bracket the IAW x+y as in x/(x+y) otherwise it is just x/x to which y is added. In IAW other words, you are multiplying 100 by 1 plus the value of y. Actually, it does not work unless I use the undocumented %sum() macro. It does for me. A QT consisting of %calculate(100*77/(77+185)) gives me 29.389313 -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu) No of SETI units returned: 306 Processing time: 1 years, 252 days, 11 hours. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Math in The Bat! Macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Robin, On Tuesday, August 03, 2004 , at 14:07:05[GMT +1000](which was 9:07 PM where I live) you wrote (at least in part): RA A QT consisting of %calculate(100*77/(77+185)) gives me 29.389313 This is what I had to use to get it working ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24) BayesIT guessed right %calculate=100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(24)/%STATSPAMLETTERS(24))%% of the time My email is %_Sum=%Calc(%STATSPAMLETTERS(24)+%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24))%- %_Quot=%Calc(77/%_sum)%- %_Percent=%calc(100*%_quot)%- %_Percent%% spam = Please check for any errors, my math is poor - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Teacher Critic :einsteinyoyo: If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. - - The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) ==Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.9) Total Spam Emails: 104 Total Clean Emails: 147 BayesIT guessed right 99.942308% of the time My email is 30.6773% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: Big Brother is REALLY watching you iQA/AwUBQRBkFG2u7N+Qh+ieEQKtUACeJnHG1sBFlVTebiDRUYw1IxzWmygAoPqU m14mpXEhYyBhCjbwdwh3X+9O =rJNv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: %smartquote in MyMacro 1.11 erases quoted text
Hello! MLW I have been trying the %smartquote from the latest MYMacros 1.11. MLW It seems to do nothing by erase the text that should be quoted. MLW Anyone using it successfully? I do :) Could you be more specific please? -- Andrew Perevodchik Kiev, Ukraine The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/1 on Windows XP; MyMacros 1.11 BayesIt! 0.5.10; ajsMacro; MyGate 2.7.0.172 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
