Re: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Günter,


 That makes some sense if I understand it correctly: with IMAP, the
 folder structure moves from the local computer to the server

Theoretically, the other way around: What is on the server will be
seen by the client, by any client. Of course, you use the client to
create and move folders on the server.


 and all of TB's filtering of the inbox to the folders therefore
 takes place at server level? 

It would affect server level. Of course, TheBat still runs on your
local machine, and so do its filters. But (while connected) the
instant a filter on your home machine decides to move a message
between folders, this change will also become fact for the work
machine.


 And any local folder structure is an exact replica of the server's
 folder structure? 

Yes, this is correct.


 If I have local folders on the home machine but not on the work
 machine, moving messages from the server to the local folders will
 delete it from the server and therefore from the folder structure on
 the work machine (which only replicates that on the server)?

Exactly, that's the idea. Compare it to a classic file server: If you
move a file using one client machine, a second machine will instantly
see the file in its new location and no longer display it in the old
one.


 Quite a change from the familiar way of doing things under POP...

Well, yes. :-)


-- 
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp1qJGKJPIGT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Guten Tag Bob Riley,


 Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
 There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.

You know that this is not true. TheBat IMAP _is_ a troubleshooting
issue to begin with. Even the developers admit that the system is
rotten from the core, meaning they can't work to fix it, but need to
exchange it completely.

If you define troubleshooting issue as workaround to use it, then
I apologize and agree that there aren't any. But the way the above
line is worded an unknowing visitor might deduce that TheBat's IMAP
would actually be - well, usable.


-- 
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpax0fZCgZxv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Günter Minnerup
On Friday, July 18, 2008, 1:27:36 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:

 On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:46:43 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:

 I have such an archive account already, to keep my POP3 message base
 manageable. So what you're saying is simply move everything beyond
 the server quota into the archive account?

 exactly


Well, thanks to you and everyone else who have helped me understand
IMAP. Unfortunately, it has just been confirmed that my email provider
does not support IMAP after all so I'll have to stick with POP until
they (a university that calls itself world class) manage to bring
their email system to 21st century standards. The current server quota
of merely 20MB would, I fear, have made IMAP unworkable anyway, given
the volume of email I receive. It also seems, if Alto is to be
believed, that TB under IMAP is still a work in progress...

Back to the drawing board...

-- 
Regards,
Günter

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! Version 4.0.24
Windows Vista Version 6 Build 6000



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [TBUDL] Gmail and TB, virus checking problem

2008-07-18 Thread . . . listen2reason . . . - Musaic . Net

 I haven't encountered a virus problem with gmail yet, but you might
 try AVG (there's a free version available).

  I would say: Don't do that - the AVG 8 plug-in is buggy and messages
  (or rather, the *task* of outgoing and incoming messages) might just
  hang at any rate. I have seen this error quite a lot and has disabled
  the plug-in altogether. As for outgoing messages, TB just waits for
  forever - status message saying Logging on to server. Other messages
  for the same account may relay just fine - it is just the very task
  that is stuck. The situation is fixed and your messages is resent
  the next time you *start* TB. /EXIT and /SMARTEXIT won't work when
  this is happening - if you use TB unattended TB won't send these
  messages for as long as YOU haven't fixed this manually by aborting
  the task in CC and then restart TB. As for incoming messages, things
  are a bit more serious as TB receives an RSET command/status message
  from the server and will from then on NOT check mail for the *account*
  that is stuck.

  So the result is highly annoying for outgoing messages as you might
  not be aware that a message (task) is hanging. For incoming messages,
  you may not receive anything until you restart TB - that's more than
  annoying. The latter situation would likely make you a bit suspicious
  realizing mail is not being received. But as there are timnes where
  you want to let your machine receive and handle stuff unattended,
  you might come home from a weekend off with your family on Sunday,
  and find that TB hasn't downloaded mail since Friday; two hours after
  you left for that family weekend holiday...

  As I have been saying in a previous posting, TB should be much less
  forgivable to Time Outs. TB should auto-reset hanging CC-tasks if no
  response is seen after a preset time (Preferences or Properties).

  Additionally, a /FORCEEXIT macro should be created: Feeding TB with
  that command would do exactly that - it's similar to when you want
  to exit TB, but will have to wait for TB to finish its CC-tasks and
  then gracefully exit (OR not exit if TB was not finishing its tasks.)
  only that /FORCEEXIT would press that OK (exit now!)-button for you
  and abort orderly all and any tasks and simply exit.

  I don't see none of these whishes to be hard to add or fix - in fact,
  I strongly recommend Ritlabs to add and fix ASAP.

-- 
  ...listen2reason... - Musaic.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[7]: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Günter,
Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:50:08 PM, you wrote:

GM So the local folder structure is an exact replica of that on the
GM server, and both are automatically synchronised?

Yes, sort of. You can set your local setup to only download headers and then you
will only have the headers on your computer unless you select a message, then it
is downloaded to your computer. But generally the structure is duplicated on
every computer to log on with.
-- 
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v4.0.26.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Alto,

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:11 +0200, you wrote:
 Guten Tag Bob Riley,

  Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
  There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.

I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/imap/thebat.htm

On the above page is this:
The Bat! is an excellent POP client, but its IMAP support is currently
extremely limited. If you use The Bat! you will not have access to many
IMAP features; The Bat! treats IMAP servers much like POP servers, so it
does not benefit from IMAP's extra capabilities.

Then, after the setup instructions, it says this:
There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.

In response, you wrote:
 You know that this is not true. TheBat IMAP _is_ a troubleshooting
 issue to begin with. Even the developers admit that the system is
 rotten from the core, meaning they can't work to fix it, but need to
 exchange it completely.

It looks to me as though the fastmail site largely agrees with you,
apart from the troubleshooting statement. I am not qualified to judge
the above.  Because of what I have heard from quite a few people on this
list and at TBBeta, I had earlier decided not to use TB for my IMAP
mailer for Gmail.  I have tried Evolution (because it is standard in
Ubuntu Linux and is now, finally, available in Windows, and both
operating systems are on my pc) and it works beautifully.  However, it
is much slower in starting up in Windows than it is in Linux.  I also
tried Mulberry in Windows, but I didn't like the interface, and there
are so many options that for me it wasn't as convenient to use as
Evolution, so I removed it.  I would love to use TB for IMAP but won't
until you more knowledgeable people say TB is very practical in IMAP.  I
think I have already mentioned that Thunderbird does well in IMAP.  I
use it for a community volunteer organization's Gmail IMAP account.
 
 If you define troubleshooting issue as workaround to use it, then
 I apologize and agree that there aren't any. But the way the above
 line is worded an unknowing visitor might deduce that TheBat's IMAP
 would actually be - well, usable.

I defer to greater knowledge, here, and have appreciated your sharing
your experience with TB as an IMAP mailer.  I notice that the no
troubleshooting issues statement appears after many of their
instructions about setting up the various IMAP mail programs, which are
listed here:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/faqparts/ExternalMail.htm#ExternalAccess

As you can imagine, I have done internet searches for best IMAP email
programs, and the ones that often appear are Mulberry (Windows only, I
think), Evolution and Thunderbird.  Outlook doesn't score very high, nor
does Pegasus (my older POP favorite for years), nor The Bat!, or its
otherwise excellent competitor, Pocomail:
http://email.about.com/cs/winclientreviews/gr/pocomail.htm

Have a great day, everyone.

Bob Riley




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Friday, July 18, 2008, Bob Riley wrote:

 I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
 http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/imap/thebat.htm

 On the above page is this:
 The Bat! is an excellent POP client, but its IMAP support is currently
 extremely limited. If you use The Bat! you will not have access to many
 IMAP features; The Bat! treats IMAP servers much like POP servers, so it
 does not benefit from IMAP's extra capabilities.

 Then, after the setup instructions, it says this:
 There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.

this documentation is 5 years old and screens are from The Bat! 2.0

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.0.26.3
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 2.8.1.1
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Using TB from work and home

2008-07-18 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, July 18, 2008, 12:49:34 PM, Bob Riley wrote:

 I would love to use TB for IMAP but won't until you more
 knowledgeable people say TB is very practical in IMAP.

I would be interested to know what features I am missing. I too tried
lots of those other mailers, such as thunderbird, mulberry, pegasus,
eudora, outlook, outlook express. I hated them all, and actually
outlook the least. TB! has counting issues.To me, a mailbox which has
eight messages but says 2 or 2 messages and says 8 once in a while is
slightly annoying, but not a show stopper. The search functions work
fine. I get all my messages, I can see from one machine to another
what was sent, and I have all the good things about the bat which I
like.

I've been running IMAP since version 2 and in version 2 it had 
problems. That is why I looked at most of those other choices. I'd 
feel no need to try anything else now, other than just curiosity. I 
just looked at the eudora/thunderbird hybrid's on line documentation 
today, and it doesn't even contain the work threading anywhere in the 
documentation, except in the wishlist section.

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.26.3 on Windows XP version 5,1 (Service Pack 3)



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html