PGP question regarding encrypting messages
It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh wait, he already does. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu On 12 May 2001 at 09:56:22 +0300 (which was 07:56 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru rearranged electrons to get It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? Yes. And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? No. You can encrypt the message to as many keys as you like the minimum is one i.e. the recipient. However this is a bit silly as once encrypted you will not be able to de-crypt them yourself. You can place your public key on a Keyserver in place of giving it to every one. There is a good list on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PGP-Basics where you will find a few bat users (Including me) if you need more help. - -- Thanks, ___ David | MUA:- The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2000 Server 5.0.2195 SP1 | International | | I don't steal taglines! Blue Wave steals taglines! | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05) Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered. iQA/AwUBOvzjqvmK8eZlD0U0EQJrOwCgv3FWrJXXYLpuHFBtuBrlEsNdPXkAn3HM b59D4eFJsLcvBBEb6Mjm3xau =XMGT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu Cojocaru ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:56:22 +0300 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 08:56 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? Yes, you encrypt the message to someones public key and sign it with your secret key. And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the message and your public key to verify the signature. - -- Best regards, Gerd == Using The Bat! Version 1.52e PGP/GPG-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key - Der Wusch ein Tier zu halten, entspricht meist dem uralten Grundmotiv - nämlich der Sehnsucht des Kulturmenschen nach dem verlorenen Paradies. (Konrad Lorenz) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.75 Comment: Digitally signed! So you know it's me!! Key 0xD56C6187 Comment: Watch out! Highly beta!! !!Biohazard!! iD8DBQE6/Os7fvT+DQ+2bH0RAjtfAKCoedR93TrEFOJPItQuAhohMmBSPQCeLo+L WxkyKs/jngJSomfItlbiEt8= =XgPy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course goes back to the sender, however if I were to create a new message typing the senders address exactly as displayed above the message is sent to another Dave Wilson ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). How can I change this? Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 05 iQA/AwUBOvztYouowXdtlnXzEQKiewCgmNr79taG6Ac14i/iGv5g1CuCO9oAoP4d /tPqqokkStJzU4GN9hu3vL9A =oJFe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 08:59:30 +0100 (which was 08:59 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] thoughtfully wrote the following Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course goes back to the sender, however if I were to create a new message typing the senders address exactly as displayed above the message is sent to another Dave Wilson ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). How can I change this? What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? - -- BBFN, ___ David | MUA:- The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2000 Server 5.0.2195 SP1 | International | | Mr. Worf, lock a tractor beam on that Tagline and bring it in. | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05) Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered. iQA/AwUBOvz2kPmK8eZlD0U0EQLuAACbBjAoxPG3nQDNKWLMXEtk65MS4/UAoOLa dMHDrYU8lIO41OH5AnKBU1/3 =pgJg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:50:25 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:50 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? GE No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the message and GE your public key to verify the signature. You mean: _Yes_, the recipient needs the sender's public key to decrypt the message, right? ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. -Perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! and addressing.
Hello Dave, On Sat, 12 May 2001 08:59:30 +0100 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:59 +0800 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dcn Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dcn dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the dcn *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course goes back to the sender, dcn however if I were to create a new message typing the senders address dcn exactly as displayed above the message is sent to another Dave Wilson ( dcn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). How can I change this? By making your company's email system RFC compliant (spaces are not allowed in Email addresses). Use underscore, hyphen, or dot. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Some day we may discover how to make magnets that can point in any direction. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: ! and GnuPg ?
Thursday, May 10, 2001, 4:26:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Its my opinion that GPG is not ready for windows yet, GPG is not even available for Windows ... it's for DOS ;-) but have fun. oh, but i have ! seriously, it works just fine ... only TheBat! has a problem calling it for signing stuff (mentioned that to get on-topic again ...) Why does TB have problems when trying to import GnuPG public keys ? This occurs for messages and even if I copy that key block to a file then try to import it, the same thing occurs. I use OpenPGP that's supplied with TB. -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh wait, he already does. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! and addressing.
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:59:30 AM, you wrote: dcn Please help, I receive messages from work under the dcn address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between dcn the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course dcn goes back to the sender, however if I were to create a new dcn message typing the senders address exactly as displayed above dcn the message is sent to another Dave Wilson ( dcn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). How can I change this? When you Reply to the original message, what does the To: line read? Have you checked the Reply to: header in the original message? (use Ctr-Shift-K to see all headers) -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.online.no/~ottgrims Using The Bat! 1.52c on Windows 98 version 4,10 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 16:38:41 +0800 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 10:38 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? GE No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the message and GE your public key to verify the signature. You mean: _Yes_, the recipient needs the sender's public key to decrypt the message, right? ;-) Maybe I misunderstood the question at all. I try to begin from the very start: A sends a message to B. A uses the public key of B (pKb) to encrypt the message and his secret key to sign it (sKa). Now B has to use her secret key (sKb) to decrypt the message and the public key of A to verify the signature (pKa). Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to verify the signature but she could reveal the plaintext message from the ciphertext. I assume you are Thomas, who speaks German?? If so, go to www.pro-privacy.de, Inhaltsverzeichnis, Schlüsselerzeugung and click on the first RSA. We tried to give a practical examole of the algorithms RSA, Diffie-Hellmann and ElGamal. Did I get your question right?? - -- Best regards, Gerd == Using The Bat! Version 1.52e PGP/GPG-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key - People who never get carried away should be. Malcolm S. Forbes, American publisher. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.75 Comment: Digitally signed! So you know it's me!! Key 0xD56C6187 Comment: Watch out! Highly beta!! !!Biohazard!! iD8DBQE6/PxxfvT+DQ+2bH0RAh1RAJ9tEHbJ0ULn1F4rJ5Ykl/9D5Sy2RwCg8B0v Yl/9lM8HYYZu4dRgAR5TD4I= =/pOg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David! On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 9:18:02 AM you wrote: No. You can encrypt the message to as many keys as you like the minimum is one i.e. the recipient. However this is a bit silly as once encrypted you ^^^ will not be able to de-crypt them yourself. I hope you mean, it is silly *not* to use the encryption to a second key, which has to be your default. That is, check Automatically encrypt to default key in the preferences. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.53 Beta/3 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Wenn man arbeitet, hat man keine Zeit, Geld zu verdienen. (Polnisch-jüdisches Sprichwort) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom! iQA/AwUBOvzs8vTo1oA8g8dLEQIHnQCgrbIhUhNZQqeefdG6lmi7vPGVNeIAoORS BczaZoiMVDfu0J/f/c2iV1jM =0Csb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: deleting threads behaivor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Brandt! On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 2:54:23 AM you wrote: When I use shift-crtl-del to kill threads, I always get booted back to the top of my list. Is this a behavior I can get around, or a bug? It doesn't happen when I delete regular messages. I find it quite handy, especially with many messages. But that may depend on how one reads his mail. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.53 Beta/3 Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Absurdity: A statement of belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. (Ambrose Bierce) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom! iQA/AwUBOvzraPTo1oA8g8dLEQJC8ACfXDkpMbcnvsjjUct2wusiu3QfSPIAn2co kvfs2tEmGGKYkAnECQIY+vUc =2u2R -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
Yes -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:38:30 AM, you wrote: DE What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept) - -- Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 05 iQA/AwUBOv0LeouowXdtlnXzEQIjhACfcHFFsGqPBKOqlQXIPTltiTHA6R4Anj95 T48JQIntZWfpPT9i1xoN0jgP =O9os -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[3]: TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 11:07:44 +0100 (which was 11:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points DE What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept) So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? - -- HAND, ___ David | MUA:- The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2000 Server 5.0.2195 SP1 | International | | Oxymoron: Commercial Art. | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05) Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered. iQA/AwUBOv0PMPmK8eZlD0U0EQJ3TACg8P7hF7ux/9BTgj/ilcxBtWvy18cAnjH+ E7gcdNNTWoXLfiDd00W3bHy2 =2n27 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: ! and GnuPg ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Silviu, On 12 May 2001 at 11:48:37 +0300 (which was 09:48 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: SC Why does TB have problems when trying to import GnuPG public SC keys ? This might be the moment to mention PGP-Basics, a very good and friendly PGP learners list. You'll find many TBUDL members there. You can sign up at [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com ] [ Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH and fellow end user ] TB! v1.53/iKey1000 S/N 55238-48F0B on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 05) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOv0S8znkJKuSnc2gEQLokwCfbOIdbWwaT/llda/Ko6ioKgfqL9wAoJ5D Opc1J+oL8rJtz6xIQ2HNo0iP =OL4Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 11:03:49 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 17:03 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: GE Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE verify the signature but she could reveal the plaintext message from GE the ciphertext. Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a message. Maybe I'm wrong about this? GE I assume you are Thomas, who speaks German?? If so, go to GE www.pro-privacy.de I am, and I will take a look. Thanks. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. In a Vienna hotel: In case of fire, do your utmost to alarm the hotel porter. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder
Hello, In a multiple account use, one of my outbox links on another account outbox. For example : smtih's outbox link on the john's outbox folder. How can i change that as the smith outbox folder option are inn gray. I can't change The directory or anything. Thanx for your help Xcuse my english, je suis français - i am french -- A bientôt, Maxime.Moulin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: basic template question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 May 2001 07:52:34 +0300, Silviu wrote these words of wisdom: Would someone give me an example of how I would set up a NEW template for my TBUDL folder to set the TO: field to the list address. SC Are you sure you want to do this ? The list posts have reply-to SC address so you don't really need use a macro to get the lists SC address into the To: field. He actually means New Message template. I personally prefer an address book entry, with specific templates designed for the list. Adding the address to the favourites list will make it easy to create a new message by selecting the address from the favourites menu (just to the right of the create new message button on the toolbar). For the folder template, at the end of the template, one can place %To=TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED] That will automatically fill in the address for a new message. ©Allie - -- A. Curtis Martin List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user) Using SecureBat! (v1.53/iKey1000)293FF-929OB | Win2k (SP1) - 'hAS ANYONE SEEN MY cAPSLOCK KEY?' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar 6.5.8ckt (build 05) Comment: KeyID: 0x57C9EB602B0717E2 (Sealed for security). iQA/AwUBOv0auVfJ62ArBxfiEQJJqwCfRXKxWxP4CRPTlMAWgIsxUPWT0h4An3Fa MHms35SFEOcyb52sV2LPFY98 =0eHY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 May 2001 18:42:34 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our collective wisdom: GE Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE verify the signature but she could reveal the plaintext message from GE the ciphertext. T Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a T message. Maybe I'm wrong about this? AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures. However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your private key to decrypt it. The messages encryption has nothing to do with the senders public key. ©Allie - -- A. Curtis Martin List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user) Using SecureBat! (v1.53/iKey1000)293FF-929OB | Win2k (SP1) - 'The longer the title, the less important the job.' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar 6.5.8ckt (build 05) Comment: KeyID: 0x57C9EB602B0717E2 (Sealed for security). iQA/AwUBOv0dq1fJ62ArBxfiEQKJsQCfU9JCVbWJc7xwiNxsVL/dfv7E1ygAn1+k 4yK+U0p4NDY/m7AgPxOZcgXp =T6Mn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[4]: TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 11:23:44 AM, you wrote: DE So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? Unfortunately neither go to my work address, but the other Dave. - -- Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 05 iQA/AwUBOv0p4IuowXdtlnXzEQIStgCeLUJ4X84owQ014dkY5FxcY0SFXdoAn3yQ A9CeTOWAGzqJAZYaZ1negzxG =m8te -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! and addressing.
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 12:07:44 PM, you wrote: dcn The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept) What happens if you use exactly this address in the To: field of a new message? My guess is that you companys mail system uses the Wilson, Dave I (Dept) part of the massage to direct it to the correct mailbox, and that the quotes are important to get this header information unharmed through the mail system. -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.online.no/~ottgrims Using The Bat! 1.52c on Windows 98 version 4,10 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
TB and OpenPGP
Hopefully this will be the last message about this stuff that comes from me. I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and there's a grey dot in the Validity column. What is going on ? -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh wait, he already does. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
Hello Allie, On Sat, 12 May 2001 06:25:31 -0500 GMT (12/05/2001, 19:25 +0800 GMT), A Curtis Martin wrote: T Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a T message. Maybe I'm wrong about this? ACM AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures. ACM However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your ACM private key to decrypt it. I stand corrected. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. When the radio mentions a landslide, cross your fingers and hope it is talking about an election. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB and OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu Cojocaru ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 15:55:51 +0300 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 14:55 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and there's a grey dot in the Validity column. What is going on ? The validity is set by signing the key with your secret key. But this means you have verified the authenticity of the public key by comparing the fingerprint with your friend. Once you are sure that the received key belongs to the person who pretends to be the key owner and you have verified that the key wasn't changed on its way through the web you may sign it. But please, don't do this without your friends permission and do not upload the key to the server: instead send it back to your friend, signed exportable. And remember: others might rely on your signature. - -- Best regards, Gerd == Using The Bat! Version 1.52e PGP/GPG-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key - Man kann auch ohne Hund leben, aber es lohnt sich nicht! Heinz Rühmann -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.75 Comment: It's me!! Key-ID 0xD56C6187 Comment: Caution, beta version, extremely biohazardous stuff. iD8DBQE6/ThvTL+wetVsYYcRAl6DAKDudU89y51o0hqJBxK+MjLOiZmQNACcDqbU Igr4y4wORYMvpAa2ie6hWJk= =/aQ3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB and OpenPGP
Saturday, May 12, 2001, 3:55:51 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: Hopefully this will be the last message about this stuff that comes from me. I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and there's a grey dot in the Validity column. What is going on ? Also, I requested and got the PGP keys of two people on this list, and imported them. I found out how to make those keys valid, I had to sight those keys with my key (aparently). Then I tried to check their PGP signatures in the messages they sent to the list. They returned invalid. I have an idea why this happens but I am not sure, could it be the fact that all e-mail sent to the list gets has this: -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] that invalids them ? I remember that someone on the list said that PGP signatures have something to do with the text of the actual e-mail. So I figure that if the e-mail message has been tampered with the signature becomes invalid. -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh wait, he already does. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB and OpenPGP
Hi Silviu, On Sat, 12 May 2001, at 15:55:51 +0300 you wrote: SC I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key SC manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try SC to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and SC there's a grey dot in the Validity column. What is going on ? You have to sign a public key to express that this key is from the person it pretends to be. After that the key will be valid and you can change the level of trust you put in that person (and therefore in the keys this person signs). -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetPublicKey | -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB and OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Silviu, On 12 May 2001 at 15:55:51 +0300 (which was 13:55 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru wrote to TBUDL and made these points: SC I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the SC key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try SC to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and SC there's a grey dot in the Validity column. What is going on ? You haven't signed his key on your keyring. Until you do that, you haven't validated it. PGP believes that you don't trust the key until you sign it with your key to say that you do. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com ] [ Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH and fellow end user ] TB! v1.53/iKey1000 S/N 55238-48F0B on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 05) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOv0/LTnkJKuSnc2gEQKVOQCg+ZLkfI/hSsEpeZMaRxtVRPNQbQMAnjMp 8Oh/b5bnOGGxV79xIzCLMNdL =y3MN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: folder popup delay time
Hello Batters, So when I drag an email onto the top Personal Mails folder it takes about 4 seconds until the folder opens up and displays the sub-folders. How can I reduce this delay? One option would be to use the keyboard. Hit CTRL-V and you can navigate through the folder structure easily using the arrow-keys. But I agree with you that the delay should be customizable (it is not at the moment AFAIK). Another idea would be to open the folder immediately when clicking with the right mouse-button (or beeing able to use the normal +/- with the right button). -- CaLViN mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 under Windows NT 5.0 Service Pack 1 Build 2195 . -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Edit Message Window
On Friday, May 11, 2001, 10:52:32 AM, David Elliott wrote: Whilst replying to the email from the edit window choose [View] then un-tick [Original text] Excellent. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.52f on Windows 98 version 4,90 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[5]: TB! and addressing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hail Dave, On 12 May 2001 at 13:17:26 +0100 (which was 13:17 where I live) Dave Wilson wrote and made these points DE So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? Unfortunately neither go to my work address, but the other Dave. This that there are a number of thing and all that it is out of your control. (1) The work SMTP server is not case sensitive (as it should be) (2) The [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not your email address, as this is the bit that the SMTP server should be looking at to route the email. (3) I can not understand how any mail routed to you at work can get to you if it had been routed to Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] it must be looking at the info from Wilson, Dave I (Dept) and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] , which is where it should be looking. I (personally) don't know of an SMTP server that does that(, and I have use a few). Has any one got any other ideas. - -- BBFN, ___ David | MUA:- The Bat! 1.53 Beta/3 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2000 Server 5.0.2195 SP1 | International | | I say we ride down to @FN@'s and steal his tagline file.| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 05) Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered. iQA/AwUBOv1VzPmK8eZlD0U0EQJxxQCgniniCvuNoP32JkPzbCbKUOO7E8sAoOhQ yC5GjFJZHsAwdfW1aTpzMLHB =wWP1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Edit Message Window
Friday, May 11, 2001, 6:52:32 PM, David Elliott wrote: If I reply a message, at 'edit mail message' window, there is two window. One for write message and one for read original message. I want to elimininate the window for reading original message. How to do it? Whilst replying to the email from the edit window choose [View] then un-tick [Original text] I've always wondered since I started using TB what good does that Original text window do... -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh wait, he already does. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Edit Message Window
SC I've always wondered since I started using TB what good does SC that Original text window do... I used to use it all of the time, until I switched over to a laptop with a low 800 x 600 resolution had to conserve screen space where I could. When handling my personal mail, I don't always want to include quoted text in my reply- so I can scroll through the message I am responding to in the window above without having to delete quoted text as I go . . . in that respect, it really is quite handy . . . -- unless, of course, the person to whom you are replying doesn't have an email editor that hard wraps. Then you get long lines of text that are just annoying ~ and as near as I can tell, TB! won't automatically wrap long lines in that little window. j. -- Created by The_Bat! Version: 1.53 Beta/4 in Windows 98, build -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB and OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 6:19:48 AM, Gerd Ewald wrote: The validity is set by signing the key with your secret key. But this means you have verified the authenticity of the public key by comparing the fingerprint with your friend. Correct, but also realize there are two types of signatures... exportable and non-exportable, with the difference being exportable signatures will permanently remain with that Public Key if you ever upload that Public Key to any of the KeyServes. Non-exportable means the signature shows only on the Public Key on *your* Public Key Ring. Once you are sure that the received key belongs to the person who pretends to be the key owner and you have verified that the key wasn't changed on its way through the web you may sign it. But please, don't do this without your friends permission and do not upload the key to the server: instead send it back to your friend, signed exportable. Correct again, but if Silviu only wants to rid the verification info of the Invalid designation, this can be done by signing with a non-exportable signature once the Key Fingerprints have been compared. Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/WPwxQKEdHuj/c4RAodRAJ0YT3wM/CcZ06sUS04DUd0iJBpqVQCfT5Oe hoEG4/HfbD1+uIDbO54UHcQ= =6jBJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 3:50:13 AM, Maxime.Moulin wrote: In a multiple account use, one of my outbox links on another account outbox. For example : smtih's outbox link on the john's outbox folder. Do you mean that messages in the Outbox for Account A are somehow linked to messages in the Outbox of Account B? I've never heard of that happening before... and if that's the case, perhaps the answer lies in some kind of Account sharing setup in Network Administration? Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/WVOxQKEdHuj/c4RAsIKAJ9TDMDqf0FQNJuqK7m9b1pf+jqrjACg2OQM l4Oih5SzbTnQTp1KnWmdoO8= =znFF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 11, 2001, at 11:56:22 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? Correct. Contained within that Public Key are all the User Preferences for such things as the encryption algorithm to use. And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? That is correct. Again, there is information contained in your Public Key that tells the Sender which encryption algorithm you prefer them to use. Basically, we use Public Keys to encrypt to/with, as well as verify signatures, and we use our Private Key(s) to actually create signatures, and to decrypt messages. Our Private Key(s) are stored in an encrypted state on our Computers, which is why we need to supply our passphrase to decrypt them so they can be used to decrypt or sign a message. Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 (Build 174) Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iQA/AwUBOv1nSsUChHR7o/3OEQLYcgCg5Z3Q5WMVbOh/rHASc3i3821aQVUAoMoc UOcRSzG2ZuIAZ30T6miOoCXI =7Q6H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 4:25:31 AM, A Curtis Martin wrote: AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures. However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your private key to decrypt it. The messages encryption has nothing to do with the senders public key. Correct. If someone encrypts to our Public Key, then we need our Private Key to decrypt. If someone signs their message with their Private Key, then we will use their Public Key to verify that signature. Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/WiYxQKEdHuj/c4RAh+pAJ9HYT1WjPfN9muIAhHAzm1NyUORMwCfSCUJ +NfesPZNUC76WZuSz6Qrets= =CKPi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Changing Dictionaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 11, 2001, at 10:52:24 PM, John Phillips wrote: OK. I downloaded the International Pack, selected British English for the spell checker. Still uses the American English dictionary. In what respect? Do you mean that as you type the message, TB! isn't correcting words like favorite and suggesting you change it to favourite? That would be a function of SpellChecker/Automatic checking. What happens if you finish your message and choose SpellChecker/Check Entire Text? Look in the Speller Folder on your Hard Drive and make sure you have both the sscebr.tlx and sscebr12.clx files. Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/WsCxQKEdHuj/c4RAkQvAJ997flNEJPqFIX0WLIKlLjreFWcHACdFpyJ 9MU4UH3kw0k6bxVI7yKRIuc= =hJA7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filtering on 'reply-to'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 10, 2001, at 11:43:00 PM, Maurice Snellen wrote: I subscribe to a number of mailinglists where people will often send announcements to more than one list. My current filtering setup causes all these crossposts to end up in the folder of one list, instead of getting spread between the respective folders. I run into the same problems, and what I did was right click a message from each List and looked at the RFC-822 headers... picking an identifiable one from each List and using that as my Filter criteria. For some of them, I may be able to work around that by using the address in the 'Sender:' header as matching string, but not all lists set this header. No, but most ML's that do not supply Reply-To: headers will have the Sender: header. If not, then you just have to look through the headers and find that one distinguishable header that will consistently identify that Mailing List. All the TB! related Lists have the following: X-MDMailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most of the others will have either the Reply-To: or Sender: headers you can use, but TB! will accept any header you find in the Header List, but just make sure you set the Filter up as Thomas has suggested: String: X-MDMailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Presence: Yes Location: Kludges Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/XEIxQKEdHuj/c4RAmkkAJ4v8j/PYMiMNig43x0ZkGK6F+vzYwCgpotr 8/KS4VqXcLGPc/0Whtg0tb4= =XtEh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: deleting threads behaivor
Hello Brandt, Long time ago, on Saturday, May 12, 2001, 2:54:23 AM, you wrote: Hello TBUDL, When I use shift-crtl-del to kill threads, I always get booted back to the top of my list. Is this a behavior I can get around, or a bug? It doesn't happen when I delete regular messages. This strange behavior you mention will not occur when you select the root e-mail of the to-be-deleted thread. It looks like a bug, but this workaround works fine with me (using TheBat! 1.51). Cilfa -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: deleting threads behaivor
Correction: This strange behavior you mention will not occur when you select the root e-mail of the to-be-deleted thread. You have to close the thread first before you hit CTRL+SHIFT+DEL :) Cilfa -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Changing Dictionaries
Hello Nick You wrote On Sat, 12 May 2001, at 09:55:34 [GMT -0700] (02:55 Australian Eastern Time,Sunday): In what respect? Do you mean that as you type the message, TB! isn't correcting words like favorite and suggesting you change it to favourite? That would be a function of SpellChecker/Automatic checking. What happens if you finish your message and choose SpellChecker/Check Entire Text? Look in the Speller Folder on your Hard Drive and make sure you have both the sscebr.tlx and sscebr12.clx files. favourite - corrected. But if I click on Dictionaries when the spell checker pops up, the next pop up window (Edit Dictionaries) says that American English (oxymoron?) is being used. I did not check the word that you suggested previously, but looks like a small feature that needs correcting? -- Regards John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML mail spam not welcome. Bat! 1.52f Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram And so it goes. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Changing Dictionaries
On May 12, 2001, at 12:24:53 PM, John Phillips wrote: But if I click on Dictionaries when the spell checker pops up, the next pop up window (Edit Dictionaries) says that American English (oxymoron?) is being used. Confirmed. Nick -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! and addressing.
Hello David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 5:24:54 PM, you wrote: DE (3) I can not understand how any mail routed to you at work can DE get to you if it had been routed to Wilson, Dave I (Dept) DE [EMAIL PROTECTED] it must be looking at the info from DE Wilson, Dave I (Dept) and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] , which DE is where it should be looking. DE I (personally) don't know of an SMTP server that does that(, and I have use DE a few). But could not this be the behavior of a priopritary inhouse mailserver? -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.online.no/~ottgrims Using The Bat! 1.52c on Windows 98 version 4,10 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Changing Dictionaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 12:48:56 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: Confirmed. Sorry, forgot to add that although I confirm the behaviour, nevertheless it's the British Dictionary that is actually used. :o) Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- [ SecureBat! v1.53/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ] __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.74 Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iD8DBQE6/assxQKEdHuj/c4RAnxqAKCbaYo+7WnH08KX9wJa91P2doDziQCbB65X juax4VvCyrjC7nNquSLBL9c= =Yy9K -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: deleting threads behaivor
Hello Cilfa, You're correct as far as my TBUDL folder is concerned. However another mailing list I am on that does not use refernce numbers, this does not hold true for. On it I am booted back to the top regardless of where in the thread I am, or if it is expanded or not. I'm guessing that after a big delete operation, TB resorts/rethreads. And does not hold your place. Still annoying. Saturday, May 12, 2001, 11:27:06 AM, you wrote: C This strange behavior you mention will not occur when you select the C root e-mail of the to-be-deleted thread. It looks like a bug, but C this workaround works fine with me (using TheBat! 1.51). C Cilfa -- Best regards, Brandtmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder
Bonjour Nick, NA Do you mean that messages in the Outbox for Account A are somehow linked NA to messages in the Outbox of Account B? I've never heard of that NA happening before... and if that's the case, perhaps the answer lies in NA some kind of Account sharing setup in Network Administration? You've got it ! Its very surprising..??? Perhaps ! i'ill search on this way Thanx -- A bientôt, Maxime.Moulinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: folder popup delay time
Hello CaLViN, On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 15:52:04GMT +0200 (which was 3:52:04 PM where I live) you wrote: C Hello Batters, So when I drag an email onto the top Personal Mails folder it takes about 4 seconds until the folder opens up and displays the sub-folders. How can I reduce this delay? C One option would be to use the keyboard. Hit CTRL-V and you can C navigate through the folder structure easily using the arrow-keys. C But I agree with you that the delay should be customizable (it is not C at the moment AFAIK). C Another idea would be to open the folder immediately when clicking C with the right mouse-button (or beeing able to use the normal +/- C with the right button). O.K. thanks for the info, that ctrl-v shortcut is already an improvement. wasn't aware of this one. thanks! -- Best regards, André Engelhardt /--\ |Eternal Tedium Sound Media Design | |http://www.eternaltedium.com | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |Mobile: +49 162 751 8530 (sms capable)| |PGP Key ID: 0x927EF264| \--/ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
