[tips] Random Thought: On Being Intellectual And Spiritual

2011-03-26 Thread Louis Schmier

Her questions:  You talk about being spiritual in your teaching.  What 
does that mean?  How can you be both an intellectual and spiritual?  Isn't it 
an either/or proposition?

My answer:   Let me put it this way.  A student once came up to me in 
class on the first day of the semester to inform me that 'I am an honors 
student.''  

I answered, 'I'm glad to hear that.  But, tell me, are you an honors 
person?'

She didn't understand my question.  I told her, as I now tell you, 
that we each should focus on who we are rather than merely on what we do, or 
have, or know.
 
Now, before I go any further, let me say what I think my 'spiritual' 
is not.  It's not synonomous with formal religion or institutionalized church.  
My 'spiritual' has no interest in and is not rooted in any isms or -ologies.  
It doesn't mean a strict adherence to some dogma, dogmatically following the 
true way, meticulous performing rituals or ceremonies, having an exclusive 
possession of truth, or being on some higher plane.  It's not a promise to be 
more knowledgeable or have greater insight.  It's not a preaching of a gospel 
or starting a movement.  It's not asking for some monastic withdrawal and 
isolation.  And, because I love my glass of red wine and bit of cheese each day 
with my Susan, it certainly is not a rejection of material things. 

 'Spiritual' for me, as I once said over a decade ago and have 
struggled to lived by since, is to realize I am not a ' human thinking,' 'human 
doing,' 'human having,' 'human feeling,' or 'human knowing.'  I am a 'human 
being!'   At that time I wrote a poem at the end of which I asked, when there 
are no titles to display, when there are no roles to play, when there are no 
masks to wear, who is each of us?  So, to paraphrase the Bard, I ask, do you 
really believe the resume doth make the person?  We often heed the ghost of 
the machine, that we are some apparatus that can be disassembled into separate 
parts.  So, we point to this separate intellectual and that distinct spiritual, 
of this emotional intelligence and that social intelligence and those multiple 
intelligences.  But, the reality is that such talk is merely for the sake of 
convenience and to segregate and isolate each from the other has no bearing on 
reality.  Emotions, thoughts, attitudes, and actions all interact and influence 
each other.  'Spiritual,' then, is my personal story of learning that I am a 
holistic, harmonized 'human being,' and learning how to live my life 
holistically from the essence my integrated and inseparable heart and mind and 
soul rather than from the facades of my pocketbook, position, title, social 
role, or resume.  It's about turning myself upside down and shaking all the 
nonsense of appearance and image out of my soul and striving to live a life of 
compassion and unconditional love.  I think when I mean 'spiritual,' I mean 
being true inside, for I truly don't believe I can see clearly and honestly 
what is outside until I can see clearly and honestly what is inside.  It's 
about my personal development and transformation to a connection with and unity 
of all that diversity in here and out there.  This is not 'values added.'  It's 
'values ingrained.'  It's 'values essence.'  That is, like chameleons, we take 
on the color of our moral character.  I mean being and living those values, not 
just saying or listing them.  I mean having and exercising character that 
focuses on three things.   First there is service to others, giving of myself 
to others.  Second, there is everyday practicing of those values in the 
everyday world.  And last, there is a humbling, liberating, and honoring of 
differences rather than an accusing, denigrating, enslaving, and demand for 
conforming.  By 'spiritual' I mean a way of living that permeates my emotions, 
attitudes, thoughts, and actions in everything I do in concrete ways.  I mean 
not cubby-holing my professional apart from my personal apart from my social 
life.  I mean not separating what some would call my spiritual life from any 
other aspect of my material life.  And, if at the end of a day I can pause, 
think back, take a deep breath, and give out an honest fulfilled aaah, I know 
I've done it that one day.  

You see, I am not spiritual in my teaching, or in my gardening, or in 
my periodic sculpting, or in my occasional poetry, or in my spoiling of the 
grandmunchkins, or in my nudging of Susan, or in my conference presentations or 
in my workshops, or in my pre-dawn walks, or in anything else I do or with 
whomever I do.  I am spiritual in me.  That is critical.  I think it was Rumi 
who said let the beauty that you love be who you are, to which I add:   and be 
what you do.  That means, always being intensely aware and mindful of, to 
paraphrase Jon Kabat-Zinn, that wherever I go and whatever I do, there I am.  I 
mean being, what my son, Michael, calls that 

[tips] Existential psychology

2011-03-26 Thread Michael Britt
I'll start out by saying that existentialism is far from my field of expertise, 
yet we do run across the topic occasionally in the textbooks so I gave the 
topic a stab in the most recent episode  of my podcast.  I tried to make the 
topic a bit more accessible by relating it to a very funny musical called The 
Drowsy Chaperon.  Always open to feedback:

http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2011/03/episode-144-the-drowsy-chaperone-holds-the-key-to-life/

Also, I found an interesting new blog in which the author points out 
existential ideas he finds in various entertainment sources:

http://existentialtainment.com/

Michael 



Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
michael.br...@thepsychfiles.com
http://www.ThePsychFiles.com
Twitter: mbritt





---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9596
or send a blank email to 
leave-9596-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread John Kulig

We offered an introduction to the major class some years back at my suggestion: 
it was called Psychology as a Discipline and Profession. We were amazed at how 
many majors had misconceptions about careers, graduate school, etc well into 
their college program. I will try to find the last syllabus; we discontinued it 
after a few years, the primary culprit was that it was team-taught. Nobody 
owned the course, and interest in volunteering to do a stint in it declined and 
we canned it for lack of interest. Some people used their time to discuss their 
research, others talked about grad school, there was no consensus on what/how 
to grade it. The experience soured me on team teaching.

==
John W. Kulig, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Director, Psychology Honors 
Plymouth State University 
Plymouth NH 03264 
==

- Original Message -
From: roig-rear...@comcast.net
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 3:47:28 PM
Subject: Re: [tips] orientation to major







Me too, as our department is currently considering such a course. 



Miguel 



- Original Message - 
From: Carol DeVolder devoldercar...@gmail.com 
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu 
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 3:16:32 PM 
Subject: Re: [tips] orientation to major 



I would appreciate reading responses to Annette's question too. 
Carol 


On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Annette Taylor  tay...@sandiego.edu  wrote: 







Do any of your psychology programs have a course that orients students to the 
psychology major as a whole? 

At some institutions this is a sort of omnibus course that allows students, as 
soon as they declare a major, to prepare a program of study that will maximize 
their immediate and long term goals, with a fail safe in there someplace in 
case plans change. Some look at how to maximize psych goals in terms of core 
requirements. As well, it seems to often times be a combination careers course 
combined with an orientation to psychology as a science, with some information 
literacy components, APA style components, graduate school preparation 
components and others. 

If your department or program does, (or if you know about institutions that 
have such as program) can you please tell me about it, or better yet, send me a 
syllabus. There is only one on project syllabus for the course taught by Drew 
Appleby at Indiana Purdue. There are also a couple of careers courses but I am 
more interested in an omnibus course such as the one at Indiana. 

Thanks 

Annette 


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. 
Professor, Psychological Sciences 
University of San Diego 
5998 Alcala Park 
San Diego, CA 92110 
tay...@sandiego.edu 



--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: ku...@mail.plymouth.edu . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66454n=Tl=tipso=9582
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-9582-13338.f659d005276678c0696b7f6beda66...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9598
or send a blank email to 
leave-9598-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread Claudia Stanny
UWF has a course called Careers in Psychology
It is intended to be a course that students take around the same time they
take intro

When I developed this as an online course several years ago, it was a
combination of foundation skills (an introduction to using APA style, a
touch of information literacy); advising for the major (students develop a
degree plan for their undergraduate major in psychology), planning for the
job / graduate school market (what can you do with a BA/BS in psychology?,
in any BA/BS (using skills acquired in psychology)?, an MA?, a PhD? - which
includes a threaded discussion based on current job postings students find),
expectations for admission to graduate school in psychology.  (the course is
described in a chapter in the book Teaching critical thinking in psychology
(Dunn, Halonen  Smith, Eds., 2008).

A colleague (Joan Duer, jd...@uwf.edu) has modified this a bit and sometimes
includes conversations with psychologists from the community to illustrate
the various career/work options available and answer student questions (this
during a face-to-face run for the course).

Claudia J. Stanny, Ph.D.
Director
Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
Associate Professor
School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences
University of West Florida
11000 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL  32514 – 5751

Phone:   (850) 857-6355 or  473-7435

csta...@uwf.edu

CUTLA Web Site: http://uwf.edu/cutla/
Personal Web Pages: http://uwf.edu/cstanny/website/index.htm



On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Annette Taylor tay...@sandiego.edu wrote:



 Do any of your psychology programs have a course that orients students to
 the psychology major as a whole?

 At some institutions this is a sort of omnibus course that allows students,
 as soon as they declare a major, to prepare a program of study that will
 maximize their immediate and long term goals, with a fail safe in there
 someplace in case plans change. Some look at how to maximize psych goals in
 terms of core requirements. As well, it seems to often times be a
 combination careers course combined with an orientation to psychology as a
 science, with some information literacy components, APA style components,
 graduate school preparation components and others.

 If your department or program does, (or if you know about institutions that
 have such as program) can you please tell me about it, or better yet, send
 me a syllabus. There is only one on project syllabus for the course taught
 by Drew Appleby at Indiana Purdue. There are also a couple of careers
 courses but I am more interested in an omnibus course such as the one at
 Indiana.

 Thanks

 Annette

  Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
 Professor, Psychological Sciences
 University of San Diego
 5998 Alcala Park
 San Diego, CA 92110
 tay...@sandiego.edu


 ---

 You are currently subscribed to tips as: csta...@uwf.edu.

 To unsubscribe click here:
 http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d550n=Tl=tipso=9579

 (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

 or send a blank email to
 leave-9579-13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9599
or send a blank email to 
leave-9599-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

[tips] Orientation to major?

2011-03-26 Thread Gerald Peterson
I developed a class, based on faculty requests, called Scientific Foundations 
of Psych. I've posted about this class before as it pertains to prepping our 
majors for our research methods sequence. This was the central reason faculty 
wanted the class. I jumped into it (owning it) because I wanted to teach 
critical thinking, and deal with the misconceptions and pseudosciences 
surrounding Psych. 
I am ready to dis-own it for a variety of reasons, but the class does 
seem to be achieving our objectives, and it was a kick to develop.  It is  NOT 
geared to general learning about the field, career info, and such, but does end 
up challenging many misconceptions students have about becoming little Dr. 
Phils. I use Stanovich's Getting Straight About Psych, plus many handouts of my 
own. We start with the Freud problem regarding pop-psych ideas of 
Psychologists as clinical/counselors, and then go on to cover many 
misconceptions regarding science, and particularly psych science. The toughest 
part for students is to really learn what was presented in the first or second 
chapters of their Gen. Psych texts but usually glossed over and not brought up 
much furtherbasic research methods, with emphasis on correl. and 
experimental methods.  I go much deeper and add a few more ideas, as half the 
class are taking our stats class at same time, and all will be taking our 
Experimental Psych class after.  They complete a three part Review paper...A: 
assigned topic, library search for three research studies, next B: a review of 
these three articles to identify hypotheses, basic method, operationalization, 
controls and results, and then C:  summary of their articles and idea for 
further research. 
The students ( who survive to the end) appear to have fewer misconceptions 
and are better prepped for the Research methods class that comes next.  A few 
do drop and realize a non-science, non-research field may be more of interest. 
Many learn their study skills are poor, but they blame me for being hard-ass, 
and just seek out easier instructors,  but I was hoping to also help them 
improve their study skills, so that we might increase the quality of graduating 
majors.  Yes, this is a bit too much to expect for one class, but I can dream 
;-). There is a price to be paid for teaching such a demanding class, and it 
may not be wise for new, non-tenured faculty to undertake. 
   I am burnt out teaching the class, tired of the nasty student comments from 
a small handful, tired of being seen as too tough because I ask them to 
demonstrate proficiency, tired of having to challenge their myths and love of 
pseudoscintific psych, and am currently trying to get others to teach it so 
students can have some variety of faculty.  On the plus side, I love following 
student progress after this class, seeing them do quality projects, and 
generally becoming  better students in their later classes.  
   Actually, I would love NOW  to do a class that just befriends students, and 
gently exposes them to the different fields of Psych, and where we can gently 
discuss their goals and misconceptions, watch some fun videos, engage in fun 
activities to explore what some Psychologists do,  and where I assess them in 
terms of their involvement and effort and do not have to worry or be at all 
concerned about whether they learned a damn thing!!!  :-)  
 
G.L. (Gary) Peterson,Ph.D
Psychology@SVSU


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9600
or send a blank email to 
leave-9600-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

RE: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread Annette Taylor
I want to thank everyone who has responded and even sent along syllabi.

I am facing two hurdles:
(1) Getting some of our department faculty on board who think that this is not 
a content course and should, therefore, not carry any credit value to it.
(2) Getting it through curriculum committee where it was shot down instantly as 
nothing more than advising.

Sigh.

What got me started on this was that I do our senior exit surveys, and have for 
the past decade at least. I found that a majority of our students demonstrated 
a poor understanding of the discipline, a poor understanding of what they want 
to do in life and how to get in a position to do that, and even didn't know how 
to go about getting advising.

Another sigh.

This has all been very helpful to me.

Keep those syllabi coming and if anyone wants my 1-unit syllabus for the trial 
course I'm teaching now, just let me know.

I will be on sabbatical next fall and my colleague who will teach it in the 
fall is amazed at the amount of reading I have assigned. She thinks it's more 
than many faculty assign for 3-unit content course. In addition, the 
assignments, 4-year plan, making a resume and CV and knowing the difference, 
writing up a letter of intent for a job and for a grad program, as well as 
knowing how to solicit letters of rec...basics of information literacy (a 
library scavenger hunt) as well as apa style; how we can use psychological 
principles to inform good learning skills and making time management 
logs...it's a lot of work and a lot of information! Along with the careers and 
meet the faculty stuff. OOF. Nevertheless the curriculum committee thought it 
was not worth considering as a college course, nor do a few of my colleagues.

Annette


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
tay...@sandiego.edumailto:tay...@sandiego.edu

From: Blaine Peden [cyber...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:04 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] orientation to major




Hi Annette

here are a couple of older versions. you could email each instructor for the 
most current version.

hope all is well, blaine
- Original Message -
From: Annette Taylormailto:tay...@sandiego.edu
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences 
(TIPS)mailto:tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:06 PM
Subject: [tips] orientation to major




Do any of your psychology programs have a course that orients students to the 
psychology major as a whole?

At some institutions this is a sort of omnibus course that allows students, as 
soon as they declare a major, to prepare a program of study that will maximize 
their immediate and long term goals, with a fail safe in there someplace in 
case plans change. Some look at how to maximize psych goals in terms of core 
requirements. As well, it seems to often times be a combination careers course 
combined with an orientation to psychology as a science, with some information 
literacy components, APA style components, graduate school preparation 
components and others.

If your department or program does, (or if you know about institutions that 
have such as program) can you please tell me about it, or better yet, send me a 
syllabus. There is only one on project syllabus for the course taught by Drew 
Appleby at Indiana Purdue. There are also a couple of careers courses but I am 
more interested in an omnibus course such as the one at Indiana.

Thanks

Annette

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
tay...@sandiego.edumailto:tay...@sandiego.edu



---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
cyber...@charter.netmailto:cyber...@charter.net.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bfed3n=Tl=tipso=9579

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-9579-13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bf...@fsulist.frostburg.edumailto:leave-9579-13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
tay...@sandiego.edumailto:tay...@sandiego.edu.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21b0n=Tl=tipso=9601

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-9601-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edumailto:leave-9601-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9602
or send a blank email to 
leave-9602-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

RE: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread R C Intrieri
Hi Annette,

 

This was a very interesting post.  I would like a copy of the syllabus.
Also you mentioned a reading or series of readings that points out the
difference between the resume and the CV - do you have those references as
well?  Finally, I would be interested in obtaining your scavenger hunt.
We have just approved a course such as this and I would like to compare
the syllabus currently used (I do not teach this class) with yours.
Thanks.

 

Bob Intrieri

 

From: Annette Taylor [mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu] 
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:44 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] orientation to major

 

 

 

I want to thank everyone who has responded and even sent along syllabi.

 

I am facing two hurdles:

(1) Getting some of our department faculty on board who think that this is
not a content course and should, therefore, not carry any credit value
to it.

(2) Getting it through curriculum committee where it was shot down
instantly as nothing more than advising.

 

Sigh.

 

What got me started on this was that I do our senior exit surveys, and
have for the past decade at least. I found that a majority of our students
demonstrated a poor understanding of the discipline, a poor understanding
of what they want to do in life and how to get in a position to do that,
and even didn't know how to go about getting advising.

 

Another sigh. 

 

This has all been very helpful to me.

 

Keep those syllabi coming and if anyone wants my 1-unit syllabus for the
trial course I'm teaching now, just let me know.

 

I will be on sabbatical next fall and my colleague who will teach it in
the fall is amazed at the amount of reading I have assigned. She thinks
it's more than many faculty assign for 3-unit content course. In
addition, the assignments, 4-year plan, making a resume and CV and knowing
the difference, writing up a letter of intent for a job and for a grad
program, as well as knowing how to solicit letters of rec...basics of
information literacy (a library scavenger hunt) as well as apa style; how
we can use psychological principles to inform good learning skills and
making time management logs...it's a lot of work and a lot of information!
Along with the careers and meet the faculty stuff. OOF. Nevertheless the
curriculum committee thought it was not worth considering as a college
course, nor do a few of my colleagues. 

 

Annette

 

 

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.

Professor, Psychological Sciences

University of San Diego

5998 Alcala Park

San Diego, CA 92110

tay...@sandiego.edu

  _  

From: Blaine Peden [cyber...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:04 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] orientation to major

 

 

Hi Annette

 

here are a couple of older versions. you could email each instructor for
the most current version.

 

hope all is well, blaine

- Original Message - 

From: Annette Taylor mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu  

To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
mailto:tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu  

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:06 PM

Subject: [tips] orientation to major

 

 

 

Do any of your psychology programs have a course that orients students to
the psychology major as a whole? 

 

At some institutions this is a sort of omnibus course that allows
students, as soon as they declare a major, to prepare a program of study
that will maximize their immediate and long term goals, with a fail safe
in there someplace in case plans change. Some look at how to maximize
psych goals in terms of core requirements. As well, it seems to often
times be a combination careers course combined with an orientation to
psychology as a science, with some information literacy components, APA
style components, graduate school preparation components and others.

 

If your department or program does, (or if you know about institutions
that have such as program) can you please tell me about it, or better yet,
send me a syllabus. There is only one on project syllabus for the course
taught by Drew Appleby at Indiana Purdue. There are also a couple of
careers courses but I am more interested in an omnibus course such as the
one at Indiana.

 

Thanks

 

Annette

 

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.

Professor, Psychological Sciences

University of San Diego

5998 Alcala Park

San Diego, CA 92110

tay...@sandiego.edu

 

 

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: cyber...@charter.net.

To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bfed3
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bfed3;
n=Tl=tipso=9579 n=Tl=tipso=9579

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to
leave-9579-13150.302fb879d23a9f8b8b43c453fd3bf...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

 

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: tay...@sandiego.edu.

To unsubscribe click here:

RE: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread Jim Clark
Hi

I have to admit to reacting much like Annette's critics.  Some of the things 
(e.g., career advising) appear more appropriate for student services or the 
like.  Others do get covered, perhaps implicitly, in other courses (e.g., APA 
in methods course?).  Others I would think that university students should be 
able to learn on their own and / or get help from appropriate resources (e.g., 
library search through on-line help and reference librarians).

I have always been somewhat leery about explicit teaching of all competencies 
we might want to instill in students.  For one thing, it could prevent students 
from many opportunities to learn how to learn things for themselves, an 
important meta-cognitive skill?  And it might wash out natural (for want of a 
better term) differences in the learning abilities of students, such that 
grades no longer indicate all the competencies they once did.

Somewhat hypocritically, I do try to show students how complex material in 
courses can be conceptualized or organized, but at the same time I worry that 
they are missing opportunities to learn how to organize such information for 
themselves, especially if everyone is now doing more of this than in the past.  
I remember many hours as an undergraduate trying to distill year-long courses 
into a combination outline / notes on a single page (often a big page with 
little and very cryptic writing).  What role did such repeated exercise and 
practice play in my own cognitive development in an age prior to detailed text 
outlines, nicely demarcated sections of books, powerpoint slides, conceptual 
maps, and the like?

Finally, I worry somewhat that we could be emphasizing the pragmatic importance 
of what we teach, whether it is related to work opportunities or even practical 
skills.  Might not this emphasis on such topics help to undermine the idea of 
learning psychology (or any liberal arts discipline) for its own merits?  
Perhaps especially when combined with all the other pressures that undermine 
the liberal arts.

Take care
Jim


James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca

 Annette Taylor tay...@sandiego.edu 26-Mar-11 11:44:04 AM 
I want to thank everyone who has responded and even sent along syllabi.

I am facing two hurdles:
(1) Getting some of our department faculty on board who think that this is not 
a content course and should, therefore, not carry any credit value to it.
(2) Getting it through curriculum committee where it was shot down instantly as 
nothing more than advising.

Sigh.

What got me started on this was that I do our senior exit surveys, and have for 
the past decade at least. I found that a majority of our students demonstrated 
a poor understanding of the discipline, a poor understanding of what they want 
to do in life and how to get in a position to do that, and even didn't know how 
to go about getting advising.

Another sigh.

This has all been very helpful to me.

Keep those syllabi coming and if anyone wants my 1-unit syllabus for the trial 
course I'm teaching now, just let me know.

I will be on sabbatical next fall and my colleague who will teach it in the 
fall is amazed at the amount of reading I have assigned. She thinks it's more 
than many faculty assign for 3-unit content course. In addition, the 
assignments, 4-year plan, making a resume and CV and knowing the difference, 
writing up a letter of intent for a job and for a grad program, as well as 
knowing how to solicit letters of rec...basics of information literacy (a 
library scavenger hunt) as well as apa style; how we can use psychological 
principles to inform good learning skills and making time management 
logs...it's a lot of work and a lot of information! Along with the careers and 
meet the faculty stuff. OOF. Nevertheless the curriculum committee thought it 
was not worth considering as a college course, nor do a few of my colleagues.

Annette


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
tay...@sandiego.edumailto:tay...@sandiego.edu

From: Blaine Peden [cyber...@charter.net] 
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:04 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] orientation to major




Hi Annette

here are a couple of older versions. you could email each instructor for the 
most current version.

hope all is well, blaine
- Original Message -
From: Annette Taylormailto:tay...@sandiego.edu
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences 
(TIPS)mailto:tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:06 PM
Subject: [tips] orientation to major




Do any of your psychology programs have a course that orients students to the 
psychology major as a whole?

At some institutions this is a sort of omnibus course that allows students, as 
soon as they declare a major, to prepare a program of study that will maximize 
their 

RE: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread Kennison, Shelia
I have been advocating for such a course in my department for a while now, but 
without success.  I see the need for our students because there is a tremendous 
misconception about psychology.  Even the best and brightest come in senior 
year and say that they want to be a therapist and they do not like research, so 
they are applying to clinical psychology programs!?  

In my department, we have two people who do course advising for our psychology 
majors.  We are lucky that faculty do not do advising; however, the advisors do 
not have degrees in psychology and do not understand the field of psychology 
(although that might be sore subject).  They ony have time to advise students 
as to what courses will count for graduation.  It's a terribly hard job (there 
are 400-500) majors for 1.5 FTE advisors.  By relying on this as the only 
advising in the department, we do short-change our students, in my opinion.

A course early on that orients students to the major and to the field could 
help steer the most capable students toward activities that will ensure that 
they are able to gain entry into the most competitive graduate programs.  
Currently, I see first generation college students with very high standard test 
scores going into terminal master's programs that they are paying for out of 
pocket, simply because they do not know 1) that they are Ph.D. material and 2) 
that they do not need a master's to apply to a Ph.D. program.  

A course for majors could also help students who do not want to pursue graduate 
work to realize that the psychology major will not provide them with all the 
skills that they probably need to get a good job after graduation.  They should 
seek out resources on campus to gain marketable skills (e.g., computer and/or 
technical skills, etc.).  These folks could also benefit from the orientation 
course so that they can be better consumer's of the field of psychology in the 
future.  They would be able to learn the difference between a master's level 
counselor of psych, MSW counselor, school psychology specialist, school 
psychology Ph.D., etc.  

There is just so much going on in psychology.  I feel that it has taken me this 
long (15 years) to get a handle on it all myself.  When we expect our students 
to learn it themselves, that is great.  But where do they learn it?  

My two cents,
Shelia 

Associate Professor  IRB Chair
Department of Psychology
116 North Murray Hall
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK  74078
(405) 744-7335
shelia.kenni...@okstate.edu
http://psychology.okstate.edu/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=95Itemid=28
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9606
or send a blank email to 
leave-9606-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] Orientation to major?

2011-03-26 Thread michael sylvester


- Original Message - 
From: Gerald Peterson peter...@svsu.edu
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:00 PM
Subject: [tips] Orientation to major?


I developed a class, based on faculty requests, called Scientific 
Foundations of Psych.


You must be kidding. What scientific foundation? Research methods have more 
to do with reliability than validity.

Baloney is still baloney even though it is statistically significant.

Michael omnicentric Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=9609
or send a blank email to 
leave-9609-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


Re: [tips] orientation to major

2011-03-26 Thread Paul C Bernhardt
I agree with you completely. While I'm sure that many of us on TIPS were first 
generation college students, I'm confident that most of us had family members 
who went to college before we did, often parents. Therefore, we had some 
awareness of what is needed for college success, trusted persons to ask, and 
support for our goals. 

I see many students who show up at college and they think (and their parents 
think) they are making a transition similar to that from primary school to 
secondary school, as if freshman year of college is just the 13th grade. They 
need to be taught how to go to college. They need to be taught that courses 
will not meet 5 days a week (typically) and that what you will be tested on 
will be not necessarily be talked about in class. They need to learn that they 
are expected to do much work on their own. They need to learn how to prioritize 
their time, including their family. I have been astonished at times the degree 
of demands that some families put on their children who are away at college. I 
regularly see students whose parents are actively undermining their success, in 
some cases with not-so-secret communication that 'becoming educated is not what 
the family values, so just give up this college fantasy.' They are begged to 
come home every weekend, skip classes on Friday and Monday, etc. I've seen 
students whose parents have them come home every weekend to work in the family 
business all day Friday through Sunday. These parents (and the students) see 
only 12 credit hours scheduled as a full load and imagine that they have all 
the free time in the world, not knowing that 12 credits is expected to take up 
about 36 hours of their life when outside study is taken into account. 

I can go on and on... but it is clear to me that with the ongoing 
democratization of college access that a large proportion of our students at 
all but the elite colleges will be first generation and therefore likely to be 
poorly prepared to manage the total experience of college. Therefore, it is 
clear to me that courses which teach basic skills, management of their path 
through the curriculum, long term planning of their education for later life 
success, etc. are vital to the ultimate success of the college. If the college 
admits, but does not graduate, then they don't go on to get jobs that 
implicitly promote the school and in the most practical sense, that earn money 
to donate back to the school. It is vital to the ongoing success of the college 
that the college admit the best qualified it can, and support those it admits 
as well as it can and create systems that create higher likelihood of success 
both in college and after college. Successful graduates may enrich the college. 
Non-graduates will not. Courses that increase the yield of successful graduates 
from those who admitted should be welcomed by administrators and by faculty who 
value their careers and the future of the academy.

Paul C Bernhardt
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, MD, USA
pcbernhardt[at]frostburg[d0t]edu



On Mar 26, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Claudia Stanny wrote:

  
 For those who are making arguments for intro-to-the-major courses, you have 
 my best wishes and all my sympathy.
 
 When the Careers course was proposed by a departmental committee as part of a 
 big curriculum review and reform about 10 years ago, we had all of these 
 discussions in the department and again when the course went through the 
 campus curriculum review process.
 
 The course was criticized for being too fluffy and not having any real 
 content.  I admit, it is almost entirely an academic skills course and this 
 criticism reflects the deeply held belief that courses are all about content. 
  Interestingly, some of the criticism came from individuals who argued that 
 the course was too demanding and had too many learning outcomes for a 1 sh 
 credit course!  Go figure.  There were similar discussions on campus about 
 the Academic Foundations course (an introduction to college life, study 
 skills, time management, etc. for first year students).  The university 
 advising center (which controls this course) had been tracking student 
 success and persistence for students who do and do not take this course.  It 
 is an elective course that is strongly advised for students entering with 
 weaker academic credentials (lower SAT scores, lower HS GPA, other flags for 
 problems transitioning to college).  At the end of the first year, students 
 who completed this course have higher GPAs (even with lower overall 
 predictive scores on admission) than the students who don't take this course. 
  (They now offer a special section of this course for students in the Honors 
 program, but this is the same course taught to a cohort of Honors students.)
 
 Yes, many students manage to learn these skills through trial and error and 
 maybe the intervention of a outstanding academic advisor or mentor (as did 
 those of us on this list, I