Re: Tomcat on OS X
At 1:36 pm +0100 2004/01/30, Werner van Mook wrote:
[...]
StartService ()
{
if [ ${TOMCAT:=-NO-} = -YES- ]; then
ConsoleMessage Starting Jakarta Tomcat
sh /usr/local/tomcat/bin/startup.sh
fi
}
[...]
take the off that line above.
Giuliano
--
H U M P H
|| |||
software
Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X
http://www.humph.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Autoresponers getting subscribed to the list AUTO 'Getty=987-032'Tomcat 5 jpda debugging
At 9:37 am -0800 2004/01/30, David Rees wrote: Vitor Buitoni wrote, On 1/30/2004 3:50 AM: Maybe some admin could unsubscribe this annoying guy? The real question is how are these guys getting subscribed? It appears that someone has figured out a way to subscribe random addresses to the list without validation. I'm guessing that it works because someone spoofs a subscribe request, and ezmlm responds to the spoofed address with the confirmation. These autoresponders which include the whole message reply, and voila, they have been subscribed to the list. well, but this also means that ezmlm sucks, or that it should be configured in a different way. I guess that during this storm subscriptions, (but not un-subscriptions please!) should be stopped. I not want to check my mail the morning after some virus manage to subscribe a few autoresponders to the list. Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: !!! Virus alerT !!!
I was going to send this yesterday morning but I did not want to make the Cassandra part. So there it goes. I would say this could be the start of a more general list overhaul, like automatic rejection of untrimmed posts. Dear list administrator, As you are aware there is a new virus around and a number of mailserver are run in such a (clueless) way as to bounce virus laden emails to the (forged) sender address. In the last few hours we already had two of these bounces get into the list, but their senders do not look like list subscribers. I though this list would not allow messages posted by non registered users, if this is not the case could we please have list posting reserved to subscribers only to avoid this problem? Thanks GG - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NoClassDefFoundError
At 11:24 am -0800 2004/01/14, Michael Duffy wrote: I believe Tomcat ignores any system environment variable CLASSPATH. When Tomcat starts, it assumes the CLASSPATH for your Web app consists of: [...] (3) All the JARs in the TOMCAT_HOME/server/lib, which are visible only to Tomcat, I am not so sure that (3) hold. While trying to get rid of an exception when catalina starts, I found out that the missing class was indeed in a jar in server/lib. Moving the jar to the Java extensions directory the class was finally found (in turn generating a fatal exception, but this is another story...). Giuliano Sorry to point this out again, but don't forget to trim what can be trimmed in replies... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
This is the kind of behaviour that I really cannot understand. Makes archiving a pain and is totally inconsiderate. At 8:23 am -0500 2004/01/13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still checking to make sure it ain't on my side (MVC or such) Jean-Philippe Bélanger CGI [25kB of inessential quote] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mc@fornby.fhsk.se - no such user here.
At 10:56 am -0500 2004/01/13, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Newsflash ;) This has happened in the past where the user was NOT subscribed to the list, in which there's not much I can do. I've already unsubscribed this particular user. I suggest if it annoys you that you block messages from this user so that you don't see them. this is of course impossible as bounces necessarily have a null sender. If you can block based on From header, then the address to block is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (as say below, it is a broken mailserver anyway). Unfortunately my suggestion of a few posts back, that of using Sender: and Errors-to: headers, was incorrect. It seems that the MTA at csg.fornby.fhsk.se is the usual piece of junk, as delivery failure reports should be addressed to the envelope sender, and not the From: header argument. Perhaps as a long term solution we could all block 217.31.174.242 at our firewalls... (don't take this seriously!). Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with session
cookies are host specific, so you might have an absolute rather then relative URL in your links and pointing to an alias for the host. Giuliano At 11:27 am +0300 2004/01/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! We use Tomcat 4.1. We developed an application with session support. It works fine on a local machine, but after we had moved it at the server, it started to generate new session after any link hit. Whad did we do wrong? Thanks, Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's a bit too much
Sorry, but I think I will have to leave this list shortly. I am bored of getting two bounces for each message I send to it. Adding to the bogus Symantec Mail Security I now get a bounce for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (User unknown). Adding to this is a volume of over 10MB/month, mainly of unedited quoted text... If I update my MacOSX/mod_jk pages I will let the list know anyway, in the meantime anyone with MacOSX/tomcat issues is welcome posting directly to my address. Thank you Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: it's a bit too much
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 3:44 pm + 2004/01/12, Graham Reeds wrote: Sorry, but I think I will have to leave this list shortly. I am bored of getting two bounces for each message I send to it. Adding to the bogus Symantec Mail Security I now get a bounce for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (User unknown). I just got the bounce as well in addition to the RadTools responder. cant we do anything to avoid this? Wouldn't an Errors To: header redirect the bounces to somewhere more useful (like the-part-where-the-sun-does-not-shine of whoever ignored to unsubscribe itself from the list...)? Perhaps is because this list has got a very large user base, but, from this point of view, it is the most annoying list I ever joined... sigh! This is my proposal: Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [that I naively added to the top of this email... it will not work of course!] Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft SQL Server validation query
How about one of these: Select @@VERSION Or Select getdate() as CurrentDate I would rather use: SELECT CURRENT_DATE since CURRENT_DATE (no parenthesis) is standard SQL, I am not aware if this suffers the same problems as SELECT 1 on Oracle. Another function is COUNT(), and if that is not present on a system... Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cannot get Filters to work with Tomcat 5.0.16
At 11:36 am -0500 2004/01/06, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, OK, now that's the 3rd different version of the filter elements in your web.xml ;) You shouldn't have both servlet-name and url-pattern children of filter-mapping, only one of them. that's much better said then the original error message: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Filter mapping must specify either a url-pattern or a servlet-name I think plain english should be banned from error messages, for me an or is inclusive! It should say something like: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Filter mapping must not specify both url-pattern and servlet-name and reserve the other error message for when neither element is specified... Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:syntax error when Apache is started
fools... his From: header does not contain a domain but just a username and your mailservers did complete it with their local domain name. Pretty bad choice, modifying the content of the From header, urgh... Giuliano At 11:13 am -0800 2004/01/05, Robert Hall wrote: Gil, I was wondering who annimandary is since the email I received from him uses the same domain name as my own, uclink.berkeley.edu, and he is not in our Directory. Pretty slippery, getting ezmlm to dynamically spoof email addresses. Robert Gil Hauer wrote: Annimadary, Please stop using the 'technolog.ca' domain name in your email address. There are other avenues to pursue if you wish to maintain anonymity -- using another organization's domain name should not be one of them. [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:syntax error when Apache is started
At 8:41 pm +0100 2004/01/05, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: fools... his From: header does not contain a domain but just a username and your mailservers did complete it with their local domain name. Pretty bad choice, modifying the content of the From header, urgh... Giuliano of course it could also be the fault of your user agent. g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: syntax error when Apache is started
At 2:50 pm -0500 2004/01/05, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Chill out with the derogatory comments, there's no need to call anyone a fool. my apologies, it was intended with a smile! (I never put smileys though, just dots...). I would have been fooled myself of course, it only clicked because of the two reports! Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:syntax error when Apache is started
I checked and in principle the MX seems to accept *any* username at the bow.intnet.mu domain. So no way to tell. I don't remember the RFC in detail but it might well be that an unqualified username is not legal even in the headers. Also, annimandary's posts do not have a Date: header. I would just forget about his posts, why reply? Rather then spam the list, the lack of correct (fully qualified or not) From header could be used for easily forging posts (in particular for a user forging another user in the same domain). To avoid this the lists server could either reject or rewrite the From header (this time I would say quite legally, but better have a look) to reflect the envelope sender. Needless to say, if the original server allows setting the envelope sender arbitrarily... Having said so we had some fun lately it seems, with the kagy robot risking a loop after it had been subscribed by someone. Also a couple of Norton antivirus reports (the original messages seemed to contain Sober.C), probably some virus forging the list address as sender. Bounces... they are such a pain! Sorry again for the tone of my previous post and now sorry for the OT!! Happy new year to you all... Giuliano At 3:01 pm -0500 2004/01/05, Rod Giffin wrote: Giuliano Gavazzi said: fools... his From: header does not contain a domain but just a username and your mailservers did complete it with their local domain name. Pretty bad choice, modifying the content of the From header, urgh... Although your technical assessment of what is happening is likely correct - I think your sentiment is misplaced. His mail server appears to be bow.intnet.mu, although that may not be a valid return address either. Nonetheless, your mail administrator should be able to modify the configuration of your mail server to prevent this from happening. If that's you, and if you use Postfix, refer to http://www.postfix.org/uce.html. By default, it is allowed, but the default behavior should be modified - it rarely is. I believe but I'm not sure that qmail also has the same capabilities. In fact, it should be the list server which rejects messages with malformed headers - otherwise it becomes possible to spam the list. Rod. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MOD_JK2 also Fails aaaggggg@###!!!
At 1:36 pm +1100 2004/01/03, George Shafik wrote: Yep - didn't get past first base - no make file generated! look, also on MacOSX (BSD based then) it seems impossible to make the build process work. What I did, following the same step as a couple years back, is to use apxs directly. On MacOSX one also needs some extra files (dlcompat) that I don't think are required on Linux. If you like you could get the compilation scripts from my page http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html and see how I called apxs. I think the options passed to the compiler and linker will have to be changed, they are -Wc,-bundle -undefined suppress -flat_namespace -Wl,-bind_at_load for MacOSX. They should not be different from those required to compile any other apache module I guess! Also the path to the Java includes will be different, but that's easy. Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To the list administrator.
well, nothing has changed. As I said in my original report, there is someone with an address at LeadingEdgeDeSign.com or leds.com (under the same administration) with a dodgy Symantec Mail Security sending out bogus warnings to each message I post to the list. It is unlikely that this is only happening to me. Yoav, since you said you are the moderator presumably you can also access the subscribers list and see which one is in these domains (unless it is the result of a forward). Whatever the case, I cannot believe there is no way to generate a custom message for each subscriber (a bit like the subscription confirmation, to, hopefully, see which one generates the prohibited content warning. Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TomCat Server Killed
At 12:44 pm +0200 2003/12/18, Ferreira, André wrote: 1. I am starting Tomcat version 3.2.2 as user A (not root) on a Solaris 8 system. 2. I exit the console screen from where I started tomcat and everything is still fine. 3. Once I logout the user (From the CDE environment), tomcat is killed. Is there a workaround to start tomcat (and keep it alive) without keeping the user session still open in the CDE environment? if this is analogous to a similar problem (perhaps not present anymore) with MacOSX, then you should start tomcat from a remote login (or at boot), that is just ssh into your machine (from the machine itself is fine) and give the command again (use the script to start it, as it has to be a background process). BTW, shouldn't be tomcat run as root? HTH Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TomCat Server Killed
At 11:17 am + 2003/12/18, Donie Kelly wrote: We have had the same problem with Solaris 8 and tomcat 4.1.18 No solution found yet. Tried using nohup to start the process but still exits when you leave the session. have you tried my suggestion? What happens if you start other servers in the same way? What happens if you start a java application (with no GUI) that way? Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Like..
Patrick, what are you talking about? If you are reporting someone rejecting your email, you should include the headers (the full headers) of the bounce, or whatever you got. Then someone here might understand what is going on. Presumably this has nothing to do with your own server being accused of anything, but more probably just someone who misconfigured his own. There are lot of incompetently run servers around. I am also sending this to the list to see by myself if I get any bounces. Giuliano At 10:49 am +0100 2003/12/10, Patrick Ale wrote: L.S, Can I know which unfunny person accused our SMTP server as spam server with as example a mail I sent yesterday which was ment to HELP someone out with his problem? You firstly recieved this mail cause you're part of this mailinglist, like I am to start with. -- A sample sent sometime during the 24 hours beginning Monday, December 08, 2003 01:00:00 +0100: Received: from - (- -.-.-) (195.7.147.34)- by -.-.org with - - Dec 2003 - - Subject: - connection refused - not found From: pa.. at ..er.nl -- -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Like..
Have you also received something like: (I wonder if there is some idiotic redirection set up by somebody) Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: my address Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:53 + Received: from exch.leadingedgedesign.com ([64.80.178.148] helo=ledspo3.leadingedge.leadingedgedesign.com) by mailhost.humph.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id HPOJ6G-00037F-DF for my address; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:52 + Received: from mail pickup service by ledspo3.leadingedge.leadingedgedesign.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:28:14 -0500 thread-index: AcO/ELMJy+cXqrLaT5qqkzkWoKPFIQ== Thread-Topic: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:13246127643494599316) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: my address Subject: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:13246127643494599316) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:28:14 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2003 11:28:14.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[B32898B0:01C3BF10] x-charset utf-8Subject of the message: someoneATleadingedgedesign.com - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - Re: Like.. Recipient of the message: Tomcat Users List list address;you your address /x-charset - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the list administrator.
Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the subscribers. Sorry, but I cannot find the admin address. Thanks Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To the list administrator.
Yoav, I am the one affected by emails involving the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I can say for sure that there are no viruses, trojans or what else on my network... I incorrectly reported only the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address though, that is only the envelope sender of the Symantec bounces. The address involved with these bounces and related to the list seems to be: [EMAIL PROTECTED] But sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] generates similar bounces. Also leds.com and LeadingEdgeDeSign.com have the same MX data, they are the same administration and servers. I already reported to the list one of their emails (enclosed again below), from which you can see that the final address that triggered it is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I that is not the result of a forward then you know which subscriber to take off. What puzzles me is the coincidence that the local part of the envelope sender of the message below is administrator2, exactly as all those system addresses at radgametools.com reported by Graham Reeds have a number 2 appended. But the domains seem disconnected, from an initial dig'ing. Oh, and to those who have directed me to the bottom of the list messages... unfortunately that is not what I was looking for, if the meaning of administrator hasn't changed in the past few years... Thanks Giuliano Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: my address Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:53 + Received: from exch.leadingedgedesign.com ([64.80.178.148] helo=ledspo3.leadingedge.leadingedgedesign.com) by mailhost.humph.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id HPOJ6G-00037F-DF for my address; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:52 + Received: from mail pickup service by ledspo3.leadingedge.leadingedgedesign.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:28:14 -0500 thread-index: AcO/ELMJy+cXqrLaT5qqkzkWoKPFIQ== Thread-Topic: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:13246127643494599316) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: my address Subject: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:13246127643494599316) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:28:14 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2003 11:28:14.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[B32898B0:01C3BF10] x-charset utf-8Subject of the message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - Re: Like.. Recipient of the message: Tomcat Users List list address;you your address At 10:44 am -0500 2003/12/10, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, This list is automatic and moderated. I approve/reject messages from people not on the list who try to send to the list. The two cases you cite are not affecting anyone except you -- it's more likely to be spam viruses on your local machine or network. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Graham Reeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:41 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: To the list administrator. I think that this list is automatic. In the the event that it isn't have a check to see if radgametools autoresponder is and why it is that only I get the email. This address is used solely for the purpose of the mailing list. I don't get anything off administrator2ATledsDOTcom but then again people don't seem to get anything off radgametools autoresponder. G. -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache 1.3, Tomcat 5 and Panther
At 9:19 am -0500 2003/11/19, Carlton Ellis wrote: Trying to setup a development environment on my Mac running OS 10.3 (Panther). Everything I see refers to Tomcat 4.1 - and nothing quite fits. Has anyone done this yet? I have placed Tomcat in /Library/Tomcat/jwsdp-1.3 and the Apache 1.3 is as delivered with Panther. http://mywebsite brings up Apache 1.3 and http://mywebsite:8080 brings up Web Services Developer Pack 1.3. The samples do work under Tomcat. Now I just need to connect. do you mean that you want to be able to access to servlets/jsp on port 80 rather than 8080? Then you need mod_jk. I have no experience with apache 1.3 anymore... but if you look at my page on http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html you will find the instructions to build both mod_jk and mod_jk2, under apache 2. They were written for MacOSX10.2.6, but they should work under 10.3 (I haven't had a chanche to test the build under the GM of 10.3 yet). Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: xerces version used by Tomcat 4.1.27
At 9:39 -0400 2003/10/09, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, He didn't ask about 5.0.12, as the subject says. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics on similar grounds, could you tell me how hard is for you to edit the content of your replies... g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAC OSX and Tomcat -4.0.1
At 0:47 +0100 2003/10/16, James Snelling wrote: I am having big problems getting tomcat to start. [...] Exception during startup processing [...] Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/ServletResponse where is your servlet.jar? And why 4.0.1 when 4.1 is available? In 4.1 I do not think it needs to be other than in /usr/local/tomcat/common/lib/, in earlier versions it might require to be in /Library/Java/Extensions (but just might). Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk.so not building :(
excuseme, but why did I announce the HOWTO (and binaries) of both mod_jk and mod_jk2? Your link is old, although not even as old as my old howto on mod_jk but twice as involved. Get the real thing: http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html Giuliano At 11:37 +0100 2003/10/16, James Snelling wrote: Okay - I'm on a MAC OSX machine and I've got apache and tomcat-5.0.12 both installed and working standalone. Apache was from source, tomcat from a binary. I'm now trying to build the mod_jk.so so that apache can speak to tomcat. I've been following the instructions at [...] -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.5 WSC configuration for Tomcat 5
At 17:04 +0200 2003/10/12, Thorsten Westmeier wrote: Hi, if I interpret the Version-Number correctly, then it is a follower of the old JK Connector and not of the new JK2. I can confirm that. Can I use my old uriworkermap.properties and workers.properties? I have just managed to build jk1.2.5 and jk2 on MacOSX (and am writing a page on that, plus make the modules available). I replaced my previous mod_jk with the 1.2.5 with no configuration changes (Apache2 + tomcat4.1). I cannot speak about tomcat 5 as I had many problems yesterday with it, so I reversed to the latest 4.1 instead. Which changes has to be made in the Tomcat 5 server.xml to use the new Connector-Version 1.2.5? By default, Tomcat 5 is configured for JK2, or not? [...] Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOWTO: build mod_jk (1.2.5) and mod_jk2 on MacOSX.
I have completed a basic document on how to build these modules: http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html (update after a lng time!) it is a bit rough, but it works. Instructions scripts and binaries are at your own risk. I am not totally sure to have done mod_jk2 the proper way, it must be tested in a work environment. Configuration help is not supplied but I may answer kind requests. Thanks Giuliano -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat and mac os 10.2.8 update
was /usr/local a symbilic link? If so the installation might have replaced it with a directory. so you should copy the new content to the target and reinstate the symbilic link. BTW Using JAVA_HOME: /usr sounds wrong to me. Giuliano At 13:09 -0700 2003/10/10, Augustina Blair wrote: i have a quick question... i had jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27 installed and working fine on my system. after i installed the update i keep getting this weird error message (i have a little scripty thing as per apple's instructions, that's the first 4 lines of output): Using CATALINA_BASE: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27 Using CATALINA_HOME: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27 Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/temp Using JAVA_HOME: /usr touch: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/logs/catalina.out: Bad file descriptor /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/bin/catalina.sh: 1: Bad file descriptor [...] -- H U M P H || ||| software Java C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X http://www.humph.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache+Tomcat with mod_jk on OS X
At 10:52 -0600 2003/10/11, Matt Raible wrote: I'm trying to get Apache (1.3.27) integrated with Tomcat (4.1.27) on OS X. [...] I downloaded mod_jk.so (for 1.3.27) from http://tinyurl.com/qkh6. Currently, the issue I'm having is with Apache, hopefully someone can help. When I restart Apache, I get: Invalid command 'JkWorkersFile' have you LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so haven't you? (clearly with the correct location for your mod_jk.so) Giuliano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
