[Bug 2066483] Re: lock screen
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've reported this as a documentation issue, but haven't provided details of which address/page where the documentation needs correcting. ie. Was it a page viewed after https://help.ubuntu.com/ and if so which page in ubuntu-docs needs correcting? and what exactly is the issue. Are you seeking support? If so I suggest a support site, this question can be converted into a question which will change the emphasis to support (instead of current focus on fixing an issues with ubuntu-docs or documentation). ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066483 Title: lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/2066483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066481] Re: lock screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2066483 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066483 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2066483 lock screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066481 Title: lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/2066481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066309] Re: freezing, acting eratic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066309 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. I've marked this report as INCOMPLETE, as no release details, package details etc were provided. Once you've run the `apport-collect` command on your box, please return the status to "New". ** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066309 Title: freezing, acting eratic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2066309/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066310] Re: freezing, acting eratic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2066309 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066309 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2066309 freezing, acting eratic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066310 Title: freezing, acting eratic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2066310/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066158] Re: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066158 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066158 Title: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2066158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066158] Re: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. Please note, bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066158 Title: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2066158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066064] Re: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC)
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066064 Title: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066064] Re: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've filed this bug against the Ubuntu-Release-Upgrader package, which will upgrade a release from 22.04 to 23.10 (or 24.04 in the future), but no logs or mention of problems with that are mentioned. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS is a LTS release, thus has some kernel stack choices (GA = 5.15, HWE = 6.5, OEM = ...) but no clues as to product (Server? Desktop?) were provided, nor what install media was used (ie. kernel stack defaults are unknown). Your description implies network issues, where bug report is filed against the `do-release-upgrade` (or equivalent) command without logs.. I suggest trying support first.. as your issue maybe more linked to the linux kernel (or kernel modules) and not what you've filed the bug against; but no details as to what you're running were actually provided (release requires product & install media details to be known for LTS releases with kernel stack choice). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066064 Title: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066098] Re: release upgrade doesn't work, way to many "Broken" to make sense of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066098 Title: release upgrade doesn't work, way to many "Broken" to make sense of To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2066098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066081] Re: Nouveau failing to boot or glitches
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066081 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066081 Title: Nouveau failing to boot or glitches To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065565] Re: package grub-pc 2.06-2ubuntu7.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065565 Title: package grub-pc 2.06-2ubuntu7.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2065565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thanks for the additional testing. The erase disk & install using encryption gets more QA (https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-noble/4809 shows six QA tests for that), and whilst there are some manual partitioning install tests, no encryption is mandated there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064882] Re: web camera doesn't work after update
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've filed this bug against the upgrade process of 18.04 that upgraded you to 20.04 that was run 360 days ago? (Ubuntu-release-upgrader upgrades your release, last run 360 days ago, and won't be run again until you upgrade to 22.04, but you mention this as a regular cycle?) I suggest support, as I'm unsure what your issue is. It maybe helpful to convert this question into a question (ie. geared at support), at least until its worked out what your issue, but its unlikely the tool you ran 360 days ago & hasn't run again since. Maybe kernel, kernel module instead is your issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064882 Title: web camera doesn't work after update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2064882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thanks for responding, AND asking for further help! Sorry I didn't think thru my wording clear enough... To be useful the `apport-collect` has to be run AFTER a failed install, however to confirm it failed (by your already provided description) you need to reboot & thus the report I want will have been lost (due to reboot). My mistake Sorry. -- NEW INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOW Please boot your machine again (install media), run the install (as you've done a number of times again) and then after install completes DO NOT REBOOT when asked to. Instead open a terminal and run apport-collect 2064909 ie. it'll add details from that machine, your ISO used, and the install report & other details from the currently 'it appeared to work' install... THEN YOU CAN REBOOT. On reboot, you can confirm the INSTALL FAILED (ie. you could NOT boot into your installed system) or INSTALL SUCCEEDED... At this time, return to this report & please just add a comment that followed instructions I laid out here (comment #3) and run `apport- collect` as requested, and please add the install FAILED TO BOOT (as described in bug description), or worked perfectly etc... (or whatever you feel compelled to add given you're running the install). THANK YOU for taking time here to make our Ubuntu system better (Ubuntu includes flavors like Lubuntu/Kubuntu..) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. If possible, can you boot your system (using 24.04 media you tried to install) and try the install again, assuming it fails again, please follow the following instructions AFTER the error has [re-]occurred. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2064909 ( When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064845] Re: Right clicking quickly will select the first menu entry
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2064845 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064845 Title: Right clicking quickly will select the first menu entry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/2064845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064846] Re: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used
** Tags added: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064846 Title: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/2064846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064668] Re: Calamares/Kubuntu 24.04: Can't create encrypted LVM
Likely duplicate (or related) to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1900266 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064668 Title: Calamares/Kubuntu 24.04: Can't create encrypted LVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064180] Re: calamares-finish-oem.desktop is untrusted
** Tags added: oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064180 Title: calamares-finish-oem.desktop is untrusted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2064180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063984] Re: package chromium-browser 1:124.0.6367.78-0ubuntu0.22.04.1sav0 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau chromium-browser paquet pre-installation script a renvoyé un état d
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709.ReportingBugs. The package of chromium for 24.04/noble is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/2:1snap1-0ubuntu2 which is not what you're using. If you wish to file a bug report on your chromium package, you'd have to file it with whomever packaged it (PPA owner), as it's not a Ubuntu 24.04 package. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063984 Title: package chromium-browser 1:124.0.6367.78-0ubuntu0.22.04.1sav0 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau chromium-browser paquet pre-installation script a renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2063984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063500] Re: GIMP crashed with a fatal error: fatal error: Erreur de segmentation
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2063500 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. (The pasted details are intended for filing bugs upstream with GNU Gimp; Ubuntu system details have not been provided) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063500 Title: GIMP crashed with a fatal error: fatal error: Erreur de segmentation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2063500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063516] Re: GIMP crashes on close
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2063516 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. (The pasted details are intended for filing bugs upstream with GNU Gimp; Ubuntu system details have not been provided) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063516 Title: GIMP crashes on close To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2063516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063513] Re: torbrowser unusable - not accepting keyboard input
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056578 Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063513 Title: torbrowser unusable - not accepting keyboard input To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2063513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063545] Re: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: new click package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063545 Title: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: new click package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/+bug/2063545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063502] Re: 24.04: dvd image wont fit on dvd and missing libraries
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. The capacity of a dual layer DVDR(W) is 8.3-8.5GB (8.5GB unformatted), which will fit a Ubuntu ISO though you didn't specify what Ubuntu product/ISO you're meaning; eg. a Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS ISO is smaller (5.7GB) than this size for example. A single layer DVD is of course smaller, but the intended install media today has been a USB flash drive for some time. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. Thank you! ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063502 Title: 24.04: dvd image wont fit on dvd and missing libraries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2063502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
Thank you Mate for working out issue & great explanation.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
install using Lubuntu 20240425 ISO (latest RC as of now) and issue reoccurred. on ISO is calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu4 as before - erase disk & install to dc7700 - install alongside (slider moved random amount as usual, so size [of partitions] aren't critical - install & re-use SDA1 (first installed partition; what was shrunk) and critically NO-FORMAT is used on reboot, no grub menu appears. if I go to terminal and `sudo update-grub`... no other OS is shown, with 'OS_PROBER will not be executed' message appears.. I can't boot into the other OS that was present before this QA-install test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063357] Re: attempting to use idle brightness in lxqt-powermanagement leads to crash on 22.04.4 LTS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You mention it was "Reported 1 year 8 months ago" if so please provide the bug report link, as you only provided reference to a support site (which isn't a bug report). FYI: I'd have appreciated a picture of the image in english; the picture provided via link to askubuntu alas wasn't in english. If you update your LXQt using Lubuntu backports, does the issue still occur ?? ie. your report here mentions using lxqt-powermanagement 0.17.1-0ubuntu1 where the version in Lubuntu backports (for 22.04/jammy) is 1.4.0-0ubuntu2~ppa1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063357 Title: attempting to use idle brightness in lxqt-powermanagement leads to crash on 22.04.4 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-powermanagement/+bug/2063357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
Booted an install made earlier today on hp_compaq_dc7700 of lubuntu noble (20240424) ; https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300235/testcases/1701/results/ sudo apt update; sudo apt full-upgrade & no updates are available. (software-properties-qt 0.99.48.1) Following the "Intended Functionality" listed in the Bug.Description at the top of this bug report and behavior is what I'd expect. The `/etc/apt/sources.list` file contained comments only ; with all subsequent changes being reflected in `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu.sources` and looked appropriate to me. However I'm tired, and fear I've missed something (that I can't 'put my finger on'), but I've repeated steps 1..7 twice & didn't locate what 'irks' me sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214 Title: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2061214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
( another FYI I mentioned it's no longer re-creatable with Xubuntu due to forced FORMAT currently with `ubuntu-desktop-installer` ... the issue i'm referring to is/was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu- desktop-provision/+bug/2058638 .. current 'fix' being to force format , but my understanding is that will be reverted once time is available to correct the current 'regression' format triggers with 24.04 over 23.10 & earlier) This bug (2060624) thus can only be triggered (I believe) by the calamares installer used Lubuntu, Kubuntu & Ubuntu.Unity; as ubuntu-desktop-installer is forcing format (at least for now). ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
Just an FYI... but on the two cases I've encountered this issue I didn't install as per #14. I'll have always performed a 1. full disk install (any prior partitioning erased); noble (may not have been lubuntu) but single partition only 2. install alongside (calamares wording; auto-resize type creating a second install) (ie. I did two install types & achieved same result as steps 1 & 2 as Mate (mkukri) in comment #14) At step 3 my usual thing is a 'replace partition' (calamares wording) install using one of the partitions (this is a FORMAT install).. where which partition I use is ~random (usually opting to keep the partition I'll most recognize as untouched; the install where I changed the wallpaper usually so easily recognized).. Any testing of 'install using existing partition' for me would be 4th (or 5th) install almost guaranteed I believe.. My point is it can be triggered in other ways I believe, but again very few users will encounter it... I rarely encountered it! (then again what I listed ^ is what I did today, do most days probably too.. maybe why I've not experienced it much as I suspect i re-use SDA2 most days (& not sda1); ie. changing wallpaper on that first install (of the day) so its recognized on the many installs that usually follow...) I concur with view not a release blocker. -- said by me on #lubuntu-devel (matrix) > It may worthwhile (if not fixed & I doubt it will be) for me to create a page > on [lubuntu]discourse(doco) for users should they encounter this issue ... > to me it's not a big issue; I've only encountered it rarely, it requires > specific conditions I doubt many will encounter.. but could be mentioned in > release notes as well with somewhere we can point users too... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I completed an install on dc7700 - two systems (noble) exist on drive - boot install media (lubuntu noble RC) - select partition (I selected SDA2, ignoring SDA1) for `/` WITHOUT FORMAT - let it install (this system is OLD, legacy-BIOS so no ESP; Lubuntu's calamares doesn't create one by default for BIOS machine; iso.qa report at https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/) on reboot; two options appeared in grub. - SDA1 was in grub & when booted looked untouched - SDA2 contained new install, file-system system directories all time-stamped mins ago (not hours ago) as expected for new install.. packages I added are present (fortune, clementine etc).. I COULD NOT RE-CREATE THIS ISSUE.. Only difference between this and prior install could have been I selected second partition (SDA2) where last time I selected SDA1?? but I can't see that as making an difference; could it?? Given I've only experienced this issue twice, and could not re-create.. I'd be happy with marking bug as INCOMPLETE.. I could re-try by installing to SDA1 (same type of install) if you think there is any chance of difference.. but I couldn't re-create issue today (me attempting same type of install on same box) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I have made many installs of various boxes, and exploring logs of the iso.qa.ubu link in comment #3 i see only two references to this issue (within a few days of each other), which include the following --- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt) testcase: install using existing partition --- I've made four installs on that box today (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/) yet did NOT experience the issue. Currently the box has two installs (first was full disk, then auto-resize equiv.. ) so I'll try and repeat the install I made in the next hour+ and see if it occurs. Lubuntu testcases are described here - https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-understanding-the- testcases/2743 but an INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION means - boot install media - using manual partitioning, selecting an existing partition (for /) BUT DO NOT FORMAT (ie. re-use it...) This is NO longer possible with Xubuntu as FORMAT is now mandatory (due to another bug, scheduled for fix post-release of noble..) I'll add some non-standard packages to one of my installed systems on dc7700 (per testcase; something for installer to re-install), then attempt to re-create this issue & reply back in an hour (or three) and see if it re-occurs... then provide detailed description of what I did (if issue re-occurs). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2013074] Re: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt
Another boot on next box - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) This box shares same screens, so pretty much same change in monitor.settings; except I didn't have to change the primary.display as what booted in live mode is what I prefer. identical issue & behavior though as last comment (#12) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013074 Title: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2013074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2013074] Re: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt
first boot of lubuntu noble RC on - hp prodesk 400 g1 sff (i5-4570, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) live test, on adjusting displays to match my config... what was by default.right monitor below the default.left, plus making my.bottom (what was default.right) monitor the primary.display.. my.top monitor (what was default.right) now has no background, and right-click on black has the options of - terminal emulator - web browser - applications - obconf - reconfigure - restart - exit operation of system though is not impacted.. and with play (3-5 mins) I know I can revert the issue anyway (historically anyway) --- i was going to close down LIVE testing.. so used the (on display) EXIT menu to exit to see what it did... On clicking the EXIT on obmenu - both wallpapers now display - lxqt-panel is now gone (would be annoying for non-technical users) - right-click on background on both displays now shows LXQt menu - no borders in the windows I had open (fair enough given I exited openbox).. the wallpaper appearing on the BLACK SCREEN is what surprised me, thus why this add of detail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013074 Title: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2013074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062428] Re: Install randomly crashes/fails/hangs on systems with 3GB or less
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2062428 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. No clues as to product are provided (three flavors use calamares, though Kubuntu is used as example so it maybe Kubuntu but we don't know; is this 24.04? as its not said though mentioned too), nor clues as to what ISO was used, nor package version details. It's likely nothing can be done without this detail; as package versions have changed multiple times in the last few days & no useful data (no logs etc) were provided. Please in future use `ubuntu-bug`... which can be run even from terminal even during operation (or calamares-hang). If your system has already gone (ie. I assume it was LIVE and thus after failure you shutdown box), some detail can be added to the report if you BOOT the same ISO on the SAME HARDWARE and run `apport-collect 2062428` as requested there. This will populate most missing fields, even if no calamares-log will be attached (you'd need to re-run the install & have the same issue to get that). As currently little detail is provided, I'll mark this bug as incomplete. If you do run `apport-collect`, please change the status back to "New". Thank you for filing the bug report in attempts to make Ubuntu better. ** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062428 Title: Install randomly crashes/fails/hangs on systems with 3GB or less To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2062428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060592] Re: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106 maybe??? that message says 900 secs (not 600) ... is there a condition for time of internet (900 for wifi; 600 for cable here.. but cause I see as identical) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060592 Title: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] Re: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
repeat only different timeout period? in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592 duplicate? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062106 Title: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] Re: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
If this isn't changed... Lubuntu (me) could always add a page at https://discourse.lubuntu.me/c/documentation/20 In summary; my install worked; except - the third party packages however were not installed, - the `/var/log/installer` directory did NOT exist thus some metadata was missing from the install etc Users have the option of (a) testing their systems, if it was like mine, everything appeared to work perfectly, and they can just add the 3rd party apps themselves & expect no further problems (they're unlikely to notice the missing metadata anyway) OR (b) restart install WITHOUT 3rd party apps... then reboot into their new install, and add the third party apps themselves. This option will ensure they have all their metadata (ie. in the future can look up what media they used for install, details of install etc, details that would be missing with alternative (a)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062106 Title: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] [NEW] lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
Public bug reported:
full install to sony vaio thingy
- sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
testcase: testcase: full, encryption, EFI, internet, swap, updates
no ethernet, so limited to wifi (300n so should be that bad, but still
aussie nbn so not fast)
---
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-8p789tsd/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
900 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.497
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Thu Apr 18 13:31:43 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240417)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble
** Description changed:
- add more later
+ full install to sony vaio thingy
+ - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
+
+ testcase: testcase: full, encryption, EFI, internet, swap, updates
+
+ no ethernet, so limited to wifi (300n so should be that bad, but still
+ aussie nbn so not fast)
+
+ ---
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-8p789tsd/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
900 seconds.
+ There was no output from the command.
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+ sourcefs: "squashfs"
+ destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.497
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Thu Apr 18 13:31:43 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240417)
RelatedPackageVersions:
- calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
- calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
- xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
- btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
+ calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
+ calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
+ xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
+ btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Summary changed:
- full install fail
+ lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita --
failed to finish in 900 seconds
--
You received this bug
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
This bug is LOW PRIORITY in my view... - not many people will use the INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION (non-destructive install) - the error occurs which stops the installer, but most of what is required was already done, so system has booted for me each time I've encountered this error (even if some metadata will be invalid; system has been usable). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060960] Re: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04)
Possibly obvious, but this appears on installed systems too, as I booted up a recent install on dell optiplex 780 to get details for Aaron yesterday & the 23.10 plymouth was there at boot/shutdown. (d780 another box that uses text plymouth instead of graphic) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060960 Title: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-artwork/+bug/2060960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
As requested by Aaron (matrix) I ran a command on dc7700 & reported results... also booted & ran it on d780 (which I'm using now) and results are rather slow. guiverc@d780-noble:~$ time sudo update-initramfs -c -k all update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-25-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-27-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-44-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.13.0-28-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.13.0-30-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-41-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-46-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-72-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-41-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-50-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-61-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-64-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-18-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-19-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-26-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-33-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-39-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.5.0-9-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-22-generic real7m6.659s user0m0.007s sys 0m0.006s Even though I initially filed this bug report on dc7700; the testcase is listed as an "INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION" which is a no-format install; meaning some old stuff can be found.. thus probably this issue.. The copy/paste of command is from a very recent install of noble on this box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
repeated install (using existing partition) to - dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) again this issue The install abends (abnormal end) with error & thus doesn't continue/complete install... /var/log/installer/mediainfo OR all contents in /var/log/installer reflect a prior install (many ago).. but this install type is successful .. after all it's a non-destructive install (no-format) so much data survives from pre-install (date/time stamps of system directories match new install though, as most system directories get wiped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061698] Re: Editing image, selecting a region and it crashed GIMP_2_10_36
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2061698 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ( No release, package details were provided, the developers the provided paste was for are upstream developers ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061698 Title: Editing image, selecting a region and it crashed GIMP_2_10_36 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2061698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
Of no importance.. but the 10 mins nothing will likely be
2024-04-16 - 12:32:43 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed /tmp/calamares-root-hazyaxmi/var/lib/snapd/seed krita")
2024-04-16 - 12:45:09 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed /tmp/calamares-root-hazyaxmi/var/lib/snapd/seed thunderbird")
after krita I noticed (& mentioned) a kf5 snap.. but that detail would
have come from my viewing `iotop` and the `snap download` command that
showed there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
- notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
- installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
+ notice `snap download` progress to next package (krita, kf5 etc)... but
+ the installer window remained at 90%.. eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
selected items & continued...
This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
about it..
Is a release note worth including??
Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
it isn't
I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
+ 2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
+ 2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
+ 2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
+
+ So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
+ selected items & continued...
+
+ This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
+ speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
+ about it..
+
+ Is a release note worth including??
+
+ Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
+ it isn't
+
+ I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
+ calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
+ I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: false
- timeout: 120
- firmwareType:
- "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+ ---
+ dontChroot: false
+ timeout: 120
+ firmwareType:
+ "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+ sourcefs: "squashfs"
+ destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
- calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
- calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
- xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
- btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
+ calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
+ calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
+ xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
+ btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] [NEW] lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
Public bug reported:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
selected items & continued...
This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
about it..
Is a release note worth including??
Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
it isn't
I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug iso-testing noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056578] Re: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning
I'll add another affirmation that what Asciiwolf reports in comment #10 is working for me too on this (my primary) install where I've not had keyboard working for some time (see comment #4; late February 2024) Add line & restart apparmor, and start torbrowser & I can use it for the first time in ages. Thank you Asciiwolf - appreciate the solution. I wonder if the package this bug report is filed against is incorrect; but sorry I don't know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578 Title: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061327] Re: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop
duplicate filing of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061326 ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061327 Title: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060960] [NEW] lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04)
Public bug reported: On this box (hp 8200) the text plymouth is used... and this it reports as Lubuntu 23.10 during boot. - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) ** expected result On booting a Lubuntu noble beta (24.04) I expect it to say 24.04 ** actual result It reports itself as Lubuntu 23.10 with some dots during boot --- I believe the issue is lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth [Plymouth Theme] Name=Lubuntu Text Description=Text mode theme based on kubuntu-logo theme ModuleName=ubuntu-text [ubuntu-text] title=Lubuntu 23.10 black=0x0078C2 white=0xff brown=0x009DFD blue=0x00182C lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text 24.04.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.496 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Thu Apr 11 12:03:57 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240410) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: lubuntu-artwork UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble ** Description changed: On this box (hp 8200) the text plymouth is used... and this it reports as Lubuntu 23.10 during boot. + + - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) ** expected result On booting a Lubuntu noble beta (24.04) I expect it to say 24.04 ** actual result It reports itself as Lubuntu 23.10 with some dots during boot --- I believe the issue is - lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth + lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth [Plymouth Theme] Name=Lubuntu Text Description=Text mode theme based on kubuntu-logo theme ModuleName=ubuntu-text [ubuntu-text] title=Lubuntu 23.10 black=0x0078C2 white=0xff brown=0x009DFD blue=0x00182C - lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth + lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text 24.04.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.496 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Thu Apr 11 12:03:57 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240410) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: lubuntu-artwork UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060960 Title: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-artwork/+bug/2060960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I've NOT encountered this issue with a install.alongside (calamares/lubuntu) or the ubuntu-desktop-installer equivalent (auto(resize) testcase)... as both installs (prior + new) appear in GRUB on second install when that is run. This is where it matters most anyway, and it works perfectly. I've only encountered this on manual.partitioning (something-else equivalent) and manually selecting a pre-existing partition for re-use (ubuntu-desktop-install now marks that as with format compulsory)... This will impact very few users.. and can easily be covered by a RELEASE NOTES message if required anyway, as very few users will be impacted by it (most will have no issue dealing with the PROBER edit).. -- Alas the Xubuntu install no longer exists; that install being overwritten by subsequent QA test installs. I'd have to re-create the issue, which won't be tonight... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
The Xubuntu install was an install into one partition (SDA2) where two partitions exist both with OSes (SDA1 & SDA2). The resulting Xubuntu install booted without grub appearing on boot, and no way for a user to boot into prior SDA1 install of Lubuntu noble. Attempt as in original post of `sudo update-grub` reports Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. thus my prior 24.04 system is not offered as boot option. I've NOT encountered this issue with an auto(resize)/install-alongside install, ONLY with something-else/manual-partitioning type of installs.. so its not all installs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
The Xubuntu install was an install into one partition (SDA2) where two partitions exist both with OSes (SDA1 & SDA2). The resulting Xubuntu install booted without grub appearing on boot, and no way for a user to boot into prior SDA1 install of Lubuntu noble. Attempt as in original post of `sudo update-grub` reports Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. thus my prior 24.04 system is not offered as boot option. ** Summary changed: - lubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice + lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice ** Summary changed: - lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice + lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060755] Re: grub fails when trying to install ubuntu 2020.04
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you are facing, but it is better to raise problems you are having in the support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are uncertain if they are bugs. If you would prefer live chat support, you can find an IRC support channel for your flavor of Ubuntu here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org. For help on reporting bugs, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs. (FYI: PPAs are Personal Package Archives and not supported by the Ubuntu project, but by the PPA owner. Bugs/requests about PPAs should likewise be filed with the PPA owner). ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+question/809140 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060755 Title: grub fails when trying to install ubuntu 2020.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/2060755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
Just experienced this again.. Install to - dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) this is a newer machine (2008) with faster cpu... alas still 'slow' by todays standards... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I vaguely recall an indirect discussion with AndreaRighi (or someone) who mentioned a (possible?) change coming thru for noble.. I'm wondering if this is my discovery of what was mentioned.. alas I can't recall the 'comment' this reminds me of My testing today can be read here - https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/299105/testcases/1701/results/ Either way my install is perfect, except the dual-booting option offered by GRUB got lost.. This is behavior I get on Debian, so I know how to fix it, just don't expect it with a Ubuntu re-install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] [NEW] lubuntu reinstall on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
Public bug reported: Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. Lubuntu noble install to - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt) System had two Lubuntu noble installs on box; original full disk install (sda1) + install alongside (sda2) This box is legacy (BIOS) or pre-uEFI (2005 HP Compaq) so no ESP was created at install time guiverc@dc7700-3:~$ blkid /dev/sda2: LABEL="lubuntu_2404" UUID="4b96ae36-ff60-46ff-888d-bab52f0664fc" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="b22c54df-02" /dev/sda1: LABEL="lubuntu_2404" UUID="2466-48e0-47e3-af47-4cd692dcdbd6" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="b22c54df-01" ** expected result On reboot post-install (Lubuntu so calamares install) I grub did NOT appear, so I could boot into the untouched install & checked it worked (grub offered me two options correctly prior to install). ** actual result No grub menu appeared, so no dual boot option was offered?? No problem, I'll just `update-grub` and that should fix it won't it? guiverc@dc7700-3:~$ sudo update-grub [sudo] password for guiverc: Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub' Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub.d/lubuntu-grub-theme.cfg' Generating grub configuration file ... Found theme: /usr/share/grub/themes/lubuntu-grub-theme/theme.txt Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-22-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-22-generic Found memtest86+x64 image: /boot/memtest86+x64.bin Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. Systems on them will not be added to the GRUB boot configuration. Check GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER documentation entry. Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Settings ... done The issue is Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. Prior releases of Ubuntu haven't done this (new grub 2.06 change) with a patch (ubuntu-os-prober-auto.patch) carried by Ubuntu that reverses this upstream change.. If this is new behavior (for noble) we (Lubuntu at least) just need to document it, as its a change to mantic, lunar & prior releases (inc. kinetic, jammy which were 2.06 or later, it was default prior to jammy anyway). Maybe I'm missing something... I'll correct/add more as I can ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: grub2-common 2.12-1ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Apr 9 16:21:14 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-09 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408) SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble ** Description changed: Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. - Lubuntu noble install. + Lubuntu noble install to + - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt) System had two Lubuntu noble installs on box; original full disk install (sda1) + install alongside (sda2) This box is legacy (BIOS) or pre-uEFI (2005 HP Compaq) so no ESP was created at install time guiverc@dc7700-3:~$ blkid /dev/sda2: LABEL="lubuntu_2404" UUID="4b96ae36-ff60-46ff-888d-bab52f0664fc" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="b22c54df-02" /dev/sda1: LABEL="lubuntu_2404" UUID="2466-48e0-47e3-af47-4cd692dcdbd6" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="b22c54df-01" ** expected result On reboot post-install (Lubuntu so calamares install) I grub did NOT appear, so I could boot into the untouched install & checked it worked (grub offered me two options correctly prior to install). ** actual result No grub menu appeared, so no dual boot option was offered?? No problem, I'll just `update-grub` and that should fix it won't it? - guiverc@dc7700-3:~$ sudo update-grub - [sudo] password for guiverc: + [sudo] password for guiverc: Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub' Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub.d/lubuntu-grub-theme.cfg' Generating grub configuration file ... Found theme: /usr/share/grub/themes/lubuntu-grub-theme/theme.txt Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-22-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-22-generic Found memtest86+x64 image: /boot/memtest86+x64.bin Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. Systems on them will not be added to the GRUB boot configuration. Check GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER documentation entry. Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Settings ... done The issue is Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. Prior releases of Ubuntu haven't done this (new grub 2.06 change) with a - patch carried by Ubuntu that reverses this upstream
[Bug 2060614] Re: lubuntu lxqt - space between touching monitors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1882411 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882411 ** Attachment added: "screen.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2060614/+attachment/5762421/+files/screen.jpg ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1882411 lubuntu monitor settings touching screens with gap between ** Description changed: This really is a re-file of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1882411 - I've blamed OPENBOX here, as I don't experience this issue when I switch - to to xfwm4 + I've blamed OPENBOX here, quick play by switching to xfwm4 though... and + I could replicate issue with xfwm4 so my blaming openbox is incorrect.. + Now marked duplicate. - Lubuntu noble was only re-installed on this box today (re-install of an install earlier today).. - Install went well, at least until I explored monitor position & adjusted to fix minor issue + Lubuntu noble was only re-installed on this box today (re-install of an + install earlier today).. Install went well, at least until I explored + monitor position & adjusted to fix minor issue NOTE my resolution for monitors is NOT identical; which maybe significant in experiencing this issue! This is NOT a new issue either. ** expected result I adjust monitor position so my monitors correctly TOUCH instead of overlap (overlapping was default) and click apply. The attached screen.jpg shows HOW I aligned my monitors.. ** actual result There is a GAP between the monitors; my windows can disappear between them, and there is a delay when I move mouse-pointer between my 'touching' monitors (pointer is in the gap). Note the left side of the clementine music player window cannot be seen. If I drag it a little left, I can have ~2cm of the window appear on both displays however it's useless as almost none of the window is actionable or readable. - - This maybe a wrong filing, and is only a duplicate of aforementioned bug (1882411) report. + This maybe a wrong filing, and is only a duplicate of aforementioned bug + (1882411) report. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: openbox 3.6.1-12build4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Apr 9 15:22:24 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-09 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408) SourcePackage: openbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Description changed: This really is a re-file of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1882411 I've blamed OPENBOX here, quick play by switching to xfwm4 though... and I could replicate issue with xfwm4 so my blaming openbox is incorrect.. Now marked duplicate. Lubuntu noble was only re-installed on this box today (re-install of an install earlier today).. Install went well, at least until I explored monitor position & adjusted to fix minor issue - NOTE my resolution for monitors is NOT identical; which maybe significant in experiencing this issue! - This is NOT a new issue either. + NOTE my resolution for monitors is NOT identical; which maybe + significant in experiencing this issue! This is NOT a new issue either. ** expected result I adjust monitor position so my monitors correctly TOUCH instead of overlap (overlapping was default) and click apply. The attached screen.jpg shows HOW I aligned my monitors.. ** actual result There is a GAP between the monitors; my windows can disappear between them, and there is a delay when I move mouse-pointer between my 'touching' monitors (pointer is in the gap). Note the left side of the clementine music player window cannot be seen. If I drag it a little left, I can have ~2cm of the window appear on both displays however it's useless as almost none of the window is actionable or readable. This maybe a wrong filing, and is only a duplicate of aforementioned bug (1882411) report. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: openbox 3.6.1-12build4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Apr 9 15:22:24 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-09 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408) SourcePackage: openbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060614 Title: lubuntu lxqt - space between touching monitors To
[Bug 2060614] [NEW] lubuntu lxqt - space between touching monitors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1882411 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882411 Public bug reported: This really is a re-file of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1882411 I've blamed OPENBOX here, quick play by switching to xfwm4 though... and I could replicate issue with xfwm4 so my blaming openbox is incorrect.. Now marked duplicate. Lubuntu noble was only re-installed on this box today (re-install of an install earlier today).. Install went well, at least until I explored monitor position & adjusted to fix minor issue NOTE my resolution for monitors is NOT identical; which maybe significant in experiencing this issue! This is NOT a new issue either. ** expected result I adjust monitor position so my monitors correctly TOUCH instead of overlap (overlapping was default) and click apply. The attached screen.jpg shows HOW I aligned my monitors.. ** actual result There is a GAP between the monitors; my windows can disappear between them, and there is a delay when I move mouse-pointer between my 'touching' monitors (pointer is in the gap). Note the left side of the clementine music player window cannot be seen. If I drag it a little left, I can have ~2cm of the window appear on both displays however it's useless as almost none of the window is actionable or readable. This maybe a wrong filing, and is only a duplicate of aforementioned bug (1882411) report. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: openbox 3.6.1-12build4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Apr 9 15:22:24 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-09 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408) SourcePackage: openbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: openbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060614 Title: lubuntu lxqt - space between touching monitors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2060614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060592] Re: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
On reboot of install, system looks good (I didn't bother checking for the optional components given error..) but standard Lubuntu which even had all updates applied!! was there... EXCEPT no /var/log/installer/ or components; expected given calamares abended with error -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060592 Title: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060592] Re: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
** Description changed:
Lubuntu full install to
- - dc7700
+ - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
- timeout (>600) seconds as I recall the message, and calamares fell over.
+ testcase: FULL, no-encryption, BIOS, internet, swap, updates
- I'll add more shortly.. but I've had a number of timeout type issues on
- this old core2duo box recently
+ snap-seed-glue --seed /tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed
+ krita failed to finish in 600 seconds
+
+ I've had a number of timeout type issues on this old core2duo box
+ recently
---
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
- 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
- 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
600 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
---
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.495build1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 9 12:02:52 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.23
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.23
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060592
Title:
lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060592] [NEW] lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
Public bug reported:
Lubuntu full install to
- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
testcase: FULL, no-encryption, BIOS, internet, swap, updates
snap-seed-glue --seed /tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed
krita failed to finish in 600 seconds
I've had a number of timeout type issues on this old core2duo box
recently
---
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
600 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
---
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.495build1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 9 12:02:52 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.23
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.23
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble
** Description changed:
- Lubuntu full install to
+ Lubuntu full install to
- dc7700
timeout (>600) seconds as I recall the message, and calamares fell over.
- I'll add more shortly..
+ I'll add more shortly.. but I've had a number of timeout type issues on
+ this old core2duo box recently
+
+ ---
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-09 - 12:00:31 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
600 seconds.
+ There was no output from the command.
+ ---
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: false
- timeout: 120
- firmwareType:
- "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+ ---
+ dontChroot: false
+ timeout: 120
+ firmwareType:
+ "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+ sourcefs: "squashfs"
+ destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.495build1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 9 12:02:52 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240408)
RelatedPackageVersions:
- calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.23
- calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.23
-
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble install error
** Description changed:
- dc7700 install, error was like
+ install to
+ - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6230, 7gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
+ testcase: install using existing partition
- Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
- seconds.
+
+ Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
(i clicked install at try/install & thus copy of error didn't survive
gui start)
- this was NOT a clean install (no format) BUT a 'install using existing
- partition'..
-
- ie. boot & select the SDA1 as / partition without format...
+ this was NOT a clean install (no format) BUT a 'install using existing
partition'..
+ ie. boot & select the SDA1 as / partition without format...
install on that partition was a lubuntu noble install (with some music files
& a few basic packages installs such as music player (audacious i think, or
clementine)
---
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - details: Command
/usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
---
+
+ install reported failure..
+
+ On reboot I can login and everything looks okay (will be passing QA
+ test), BUT /var/log/installer/mediainfo shows 0320.1 ISO which was
+ numerous installs ago & not today's ISO (last install failed, different
+ issue but same type of install thus why numerous installs ago)
+
+ viewing / shows many directories date/timestamped matching a new
+ (re-)install, however some system directories do NOT reflect a re-
+ install; ie. calamares reached an error & stopped the system booted
+ correctly, but that's no doubt because it was a functional Lubuntu noble
+ system & it's using setup possibly from prior install...
+
ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.495build1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Mon Apr 8 15:57:10 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240407.3)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.23
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.23
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Summary changed:
- lubuntu noble install error
+ lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429
Title:
lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
seconds.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] [NEW] lubuntu noble install error
Public bug reported:
dc7700 install, error was like
Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
seconds.
(i clicked install at try/install & thus copy of error didn't survive
gui start)
this was NOT a clean install (no format) BUT a 'install using existing
partition'..
ie. boot & select the SDA1 as / partition without format...
install on that partition was a lubuntu noble install (with some music files &
a few basic packages installs such as music player (audacious i think, or
clementine)
---
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - details: Command
/usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
---
ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.495build1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Mon Apr 8 15:57:10 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240407.3)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.23
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.23
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble third-party-packages
** Description changed:
- dc7700 install, will add more once I get to remind myself of error
- (i clicked install & thus copy of error didn't survive gui start)
+ dc7700 install, error was like
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
+ Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
+ seconds.
+
+ (i clicked install at try/install & thus copy of error didn't survive
+ gui start)
+
+ ---
+ 2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ 2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: .. - details: Command
/usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
+ There was no output from the command.
+ 2024-04-08 - 15:43:34 [6]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ ---
+
+
+ ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: false
- timeout: 120
- firmwareType:
- "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+ ---
+ dontChroot: false
+ timeout: 120
+ firmwareType:
+ "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+
[Bug 2060409] Re: Some slides in the Ubuntu MATE installer are no longer relevant
** Tags added: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060409 Title: Some slides in the Ubuntu MATE installer are no longer relevant To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/2060409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060375] Re: Error appeared when updating Snap on Ubuntu 20
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2060375 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060375 Title: Error appeared when updating Snap on Ubuntu 20 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2060375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060346] Re: lubuntu noble install - apt-get failure?? temporary web issue or what?
Install looks good to me.. HOWEVER /var/log/media/installer shows Ubuntu 24.04 20240320.1 and not 20240328 which is listed above.. some directory metadata (date/time stamps) are perfect and show an install only mins ago... HOWEVER some show 28-March-2024 which better fit the 20.1 ISO.. thus I gather calamares aborted & didn't complete install... and the install is making up for missing details from a prior install (given no format was performed).. either way I'm passing install... but it worked in this particular instance (I've done it before I'm sure and had login & looks okay before, but missing metadata; where it's too-old metadata I'd say here) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060346 Title: lubuntu noble install - apt-get failure?? temporary web issue or what? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060346/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060346] [NEW] lubuntu noble install - apt-get failure?? temporary web issue or what?
Public bug reported:
I've not yet looked at what happened, calamares just reported failure.
install on dc7700; using existing partition (single sda1), prior install
was Ubuntu Desktop booted ~15 mins prior to install... partitioning
was made by prior full-disk install
---
I tried to copy/paste what I saw from calamares; but on closure the
'pasted' details cleared before LXQt desktop was fully functional, but
following matches what I saw.
2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [6]: .. - details: Command apt-get -y
full-upgrade failed to finish in 300 seconds.
Even if we can do nothing about this actual problem (SUCH AS IT being a
temporary internet failure..)... maybe we should write up something on
discourse/documentation (not worth manual) on the issue.. even if its
just a retry
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.494
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Sat Apr 6 19:32:23 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240328)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.16
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.16
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu1
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble
** Description changed:
I've not yet looked at what happened, calamares just reported failure.
install on dc7700; using existing partition (single sda1), prior install
was Ubuntu Desktop booted ~15 mins prior to install... partitioning
was made by prior full-disk install
+
+ ---
+
+ I tried to copy/paste what I saw from calamares; but on closure the
+ 'pasted' details cleared before LXQt desktop was fully functional, but
+ following matches what I saw.
+
+ 2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ 2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-06 - 19:25:27 [6]: .. - details: Command apt-get -y
full-upgrade failed to finish in 300 seconds.
+
+ Even if we can do nothing about this actual problem (SUCH AS IT being a
+ temporary internet failure..)... maybe we should write up something on
+ discourse/documentation (not worth manual) on the issue.. even if its
+ just a retry
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: false
- timeout: 120
- firmwareType:
- "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+ ---
+ dontChroot: false
+ timeout: 120
+ firmwareType:
+ "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
-
[Bug 2060091] Re: lubuntu noble daily never starts.. black screen; Lubuntu box & Connecting..
As I noted in testcase comment at terminal I killed lubuntu-installer-prompt & I had a normal LXQt session appear... At last resort (this issue maybe very rare; if its not transitory..) we can document how to kill lubuntu-installer-prompt as I did on discourse.. no need to mention in release notes even if this is done... After this attempt, I next booted box below this one that uses same keyboard/screens etc & using same thumb-drive have no issues like this at all... no issue with this on - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) I wonder if this relates to video card?? (I'll try another box), then again the Connecting makes me (no doubt end-users) think of internet?? but I could `ubuntu-bug` file on the box so network makes little sense to me... ICMP echo requests (ping) to web are returned -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060091 Title: lubuntu noble daily never starts.. black screen; Lubuntu box & Connecting.. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-installer-prompt/+bug/2060091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060091] [NEW] lubuntu noble daily never starts.. black screen; Lubuntu box & Connecting..
Public bug reported: Booted Lubuntu noble daily on - hp prodesk 400 g1 sff (i5-4570, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) Multiple attempts made, each end in black screens, with a small window on one display titled "Lubuntu" and in the white window below it the word "Connecting..." and a light-dark-blue moving line that doesn't progress.. Multiple boots; and left for >15 mins (one attempt 25+ as I fed birds) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: lubuntu-installer-prompt 24.04.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.494 Date: Wed Apr 3 06:03:29 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240328) ProcEnviron: LANG=C.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=linux XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: lubuntu-installer-prompt UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lubuntu-installer-prompt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060091 Title: lubuntu noble daily never starts.. black screen; Lubuntu box & Connecting.. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-installer-prompt/+bug/2060091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059872] Re: Unable to listen on port 22 if multiple Port= present in sshd configuration
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2059872 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059872 Title: Unable to listen on port 22 if multiple Port= present in sshd configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2059872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058638] Re: User account is missing from /etc/shadow & /etc/passwd
Dan wrote > (I never saw it work on UEFI) guiverc@d7050-next:~/uwn/issues/831$ cat /var/log/installer/media-info Xubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20230829) I'm on my primary box now (dell optiplex 7050) which uses Secure-uEFI boot, and this install was last made after a problem during the mantic cycle that caused 2 of my 5 screens to go dark (be it installed system or LIVE boots). When the live boots no longer had an issue, but it had remained on my installed system & I was unable to work out why; I just non-destructively re-installed the system as fix. FYI: This system is a single-partition install (plus ESP), being installed using a testcase that didn't create a separate /home. Xubuntu used `ubiquity` when I re-installed using daily 2023-08-29, ie. fix my issue & a QA install. Whilst I sometimes disable secure-boot (virtualbox is easier) the machine is still uEFI & I use it regularly there in QA too (mostly Xubuntu, with calamares). Personally I'd prefer the boot as 'non-ideal' as the passwd/sudo issue can be easily resolved & just documentation suggesting FORMAT is used. The loss of this re-install feature (something I've always loved about Ubuntu, and regularly use) would be a large loss, esp. on a LTS release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058638 Title: User account is missing from /etc/shadow & /etc/passwd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop-provision/+bug/2058638/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058638] Re: User account is missing from /etc/shadow & /etc/passwd
I have zsync'd a Ubuntu Desktop ISO.. and attempted the same type of install there - Ubuntu Desktop noble ISO - booted ISO, (0320 or 0320.1 I'm unsure sorry; whatever was current at time I ran zsync) - installer offered upgrade; so I accepted that.. closed & restarted install - selected the same partition (partition layout created by full disk install of xubuntu noble week+ ago) for / WITHOUT FORMAT, clicked extra options where offered - used 'guiverc' as username, and 'please' as password.. install completed & asked me to reboot... all good as with Xubuntu. ON booting the new install... it appeared to go into OEM mode. I was ASKED for a Username, am being asked to enter PASSWORD THESE ARE DETAILS I GAVE THE INSTALLER. ** my opinion of what I'm seeing I"m not familiar with OEM installs sorry; haven't QA-installed it in years, but this is acting like a Xubuntu type of install issue where the Ubuntu Desktop boot has just triggered an OEM type of setup thus the repeat of question... Either way why have the installer ask me these questions if they're ignored on initial boot (if this is intentional behavior; which I very much doubt!!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058638 Title: User account is missing from /etc/shadow & /etc/passwd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop-provision/+bug/2058638/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058491] Re: (mate-appearance-properties : GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) reached end-of-standard-support on May 31, 2023. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ( No apport tools were used in the creation of this bug filing, but only 18.04 is mentioned in the text description, where Ubuntu MATE 22.04 LTS is the oldest supported release of Ubuntu MATE. Please re-file this if detected on Ubuntu-MATE 23.10, or Ubuntu-MATE 22.04 LTS. When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ) ** Changed in: ubuntu-mate-settings (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058491 Title: (mate-appearance-properties : GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/2058491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056581] Re: can't install xubuntu-core
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2056581 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056581 Title: can't install xubuntu-core To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2056581/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056578] Re: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning
I'll add for FYI sake.. I've experienced this myself on my primary box (two weeks now); Lubuntu noble using LXQt/Xorg I tried to re-create it using what was the Lubuntu current daily (this was a few days ago now); and the torbrowser-launcher worked perfectly in installing torbrowser for me to test & use.. No keyboard issues either on the live system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578 Title: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055270] Re: Buy Tramadol Online At Lowest Prices
requested delete via https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/709435 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055270 Title: Buy Tramadol Online At Lowest Prices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2055270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055256] Re: add-apt-repository ppa:ondrej/php is not working in ubuntu noble
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This is not an issue with Ubuntu, but with the mentioned Personal Package Archive which the maintainer provides for Ubuntu 20.04 (focal) and Ubuntu 22.04 (jammy) The owner of the PPA decides what releases they'll package & provide support for, please refer https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/php ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055256 Title: add-apt-repository ppa:ondrej/php is not working in ubuntu noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2055256/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1977678] Re: Crash on close
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 1977678 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977678 Title: Crash on close To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1977678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1977676] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.7 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977676 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.7 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1977676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1977683] Re: Lubuntu error has_option: command not found / no ssh-agent after updating to 22.04
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Lubuntu has used sddm for all LXQt releases (ie. since Lubuntu 18.10), and the upgrade from an release that used lightdm/LXDE is unsupported due to breakage as was warned about in documentation, eg. https://lubuntu.me/focal-2-released/ "Note, due to the extensive changes required for the shift in desktop environments, the Lubuntu team does not support upgrading from 18.04 or below to any greater release. Doing so will result in a broken system. If you are on 18.04 or below and would like to upgrade, please do a fresh install." The error you are describing is a user-created issue by using unsupported upgrade procedures that were documented as creating issues later, and this is warned about breakage. The fresh install would have prevented this. As such I've marked this bug report as "opinion". If you believe I'm in error, please leave a comment explaining why and the bug report can then be returned to "New" (you may find it'll then be marked as "Won't Fix") ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977683 Title: Lubuntu error has_option: command not found / no ssh-agent after updating to 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1977683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1977461] Re: not able to upgrade from ubuntu 14 lts to 20 lts
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. You may find a support site more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 Do note however that Ubuntu 14.04 LTS reached the end of it's standard support back in April-2019 (5 years after release) thus support options are now limited. This also applies to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (the release 14.04 upgrades to). - Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on - April 29, 2021. - Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977461 Title: not able to upgrade from ubuntu 14 lts to 20 lts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1977461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976611] Re: There is a problem in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. You have not filed this report against any particular package; so until the package is determined the required `apport-collect` cannot be run. I am not sure what your video is actually trying to show. I've thus marked this bug as 'incomplete', and suggest you seek support. You can convert this bug report into a Question which is aimed at support. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976611 Title: There is a problem in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1976611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976556] Re: [Lenovo 300e 2nd GEN] ELAN Touchpad not working
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 1976556 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976556 Title: [Lenovo 300e 2nd GEN] ELAN Touchpad not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1976556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976475] Re: Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 1976475 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Package changed: ubuntu => ubiquity (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976475 Title: Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1976475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976433] Re: package chromium-browser 101.0.4951.64-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso nuevo paquete chromium-browser script pre-installation devolvió el código de salida d
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. Your title & package details match bionic/18.04 (ie. "chromium-browser | 101.0.4951.64-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 | bionic-security/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386") but your release is shown as focal/20.04. Are you sure you wouldn't benefit from support? Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 I've marked this bug report 'incomplete'; if you believe I'm in error, please leave a comment saying why (or details as to your problem) and the status can be returned to 'new' Thank you! ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976433 Title: package chromium-browser 101.0.4951.64-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso nuevo paquete chromium-browser script pre-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1976433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976473] Re: Unable to change screen brightness in ubuntu desktop
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 1976473 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976473 Title: Unable to change screen brightness in ubuntu desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1976473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976177] Re: Ubiquity not using password provided by UI
The media used is not a Ubuntu ISO. For this bug to be explored, an official Ubuntu ISO (eg. 20.04.4) would need to be used, to rule out issues created by the unsupported (by Ubuntu) third party ISO used in the initial filing. I've marked this bug report invalid. If you believe this is a ubiquity bug, please use a Ubuntu ISO to confirm the issue occurs there, and file another bug report using `ubuntu-bug ubiquity` if the problem occurs. You can provide a link to this report so additional details noted here can also be used in locating & providing a fix. Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976177 Title: Ubiquity not using password provided by UI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1976177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976177] Re: Ubiquity not using password provided by UI
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 1976177 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. Please note, if this is not Ubuntu official media, the report will likely be closed as invalid, as it should be filed with the creator of the non-Ubuntu media. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976177 Title: Ubiquity not using password provided by UI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1976177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976167] Re: lubuntu 16.04 frequent crashes
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. FYI: Lubuntu 16.04 LTS reached EOL end of April 2019. FYI: The package you filed against is the installer itself; so if your system installed - it's not involved; but that support ended April 2019. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976167 Title: lubuntu 16.04 frequent crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1976167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1975635] Re: PC Freeze on 5.13.0.40
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. Please note: `ubuntu-bug`, `apport` & bug reporting tools are provided with Ubuntu by default, many require manual addition for some releases of downstream OSes based on Ubuntu (eg. Linux Mint). You should check with your distribution first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975635 Title: PC Freeze on 5.13.0.40 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1975635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1975393] Re: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap"
filed as #1959 upstream (https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959) which was marked duplicate of #1953 (https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1953) I looked before filing, but missed it :( ** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1953 https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1953 ** Changed in: calamares Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: calamares Remote watch: Calamares Issues #1959 => Calamares Issues #1953 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975393 Title: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1975393/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1975393] Re: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap"
** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1959 https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959 ** Also affects: calamares via https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975393 Title: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1975393/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1975393] Re: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap"
I can confirm this issue... (Lubuntu kinetic daily) I worked around it via clicking Encrypt.system & entering password twice & NEXT showed.. I could then unclick Encrypt to get what was wanted.. What Leó suggested (check/uncheck manual partitioning) is easier - sony vaio svp112a1cw (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975393 Title: Calamares - unable to select option "Next" after selecting "No Swap" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1975393/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1974479] Re: Kubuntu 22.04 Dolphin authentication dialog failed
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've filed this bug report against `ubiquity` as an installation problem, but have provided no specifics as to what ISO you're trying to install etc. The `ubiquity` installer doesn't use SaMBa. You can convert this bug report into a question, which is aimed at support. I've marked this bug report as 'incomplete' as it appears you'd benefit more from support. If this is changed to a question; after additional details have been added the bug-report can be continued or a new one filed. If you believe I'm in error, please leave a comment as to why and the status can be returned to "New". You'll need to run `apport- collect 1974479` once on the impacted box too so specific details can be obtained. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Tags added: jammy ** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974479 Title: Kubuntu 22.04 Dolphin authentication dialog failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1974479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895905] Re: lubuntu groovy; flashing of sddm greeter
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 21.04 (hirsute) reached end-of-life on January 20, 2022. Ubuntu 20.10 (groovy) reached end-of-life on July 22, 2021. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. (I don't think I still have the box this bug report was filed on, but the video card was not my own so I cannot retest with that card) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895905 Title: lubuntu groovy; flashing of sddm greeter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1895905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922342] Re: Impish live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems
> If you now apply the remedy to the stick > dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=16 of=/dev/sdb conv=notrunc seek=462 >then i expect it to be permanently booting in reasonable time. > .. Please confirm. Inserted thumb-drive(2) [Ubuntu-MATE jammy] into box and -- start paste guiverc@d960-ubu2:/de2900/ubuntu_mate_64$ sudo dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=16 of=/dev/sdb conv=notrunc seek=462 [sudo] password for guiverc: 16+0 records in 16+0 records out 16 bytes copied, 0.0107609 s, 1.5 kB/s -- end paste booted it on j3400 - motion computing j3400 (c2d-u9400, 4gb, intel mobile 4 series) on boot (noting when at grub) it had reached maybe-ubiquity in ~3 mins using room clock (no seconds as digital). I made an error in typing SysRq-REO (intended REISUB) so as no sync.. ignoring this bot. turned box back on & booted again; again at maybe-ubiquity in ~3 mins by room clock. Correctly used SysRq-REISUB to restart another boot & again ~3 mins by room clock. SysRq-REISUO now NOTE: I didn't wait for clock to change minute & press enter this time, thus the extra seconds (making 2+ mins ~3 mins) is just ME not starting hitting the timing at ~:01 secs or hitting ENTER just after minute changes.. Either way ~3 mins is NOT TEN minutes as the slow boot takes to reach maybe-ubiquity. This confirms what I believe you wanted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922342 Title: Impish live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1922342/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1974268] Re: Does this package conflict with systemd oom?
** Tags added: jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974268 Title: Does this package conflict with systemd oom? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/earlyoom/+bug/1974268/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
