[Bug 210860] Re: After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically
It's not clear what im-switch setting the bug reporter was using when this bug exists (It seems to me the correct command should be im-switch -s scim-immodule, not ... scim-bridge), but I suspect this is the same bug as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431294. -- After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210860] Re: After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically
It's not clear what im-switch setting the bug reporter was using when this bug exists (It seems to me the correct command should be im-switch -s scim-immodule, not ... scim-bridge), but I suspect this is the same bug as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431294. -- After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210860] Re: After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically
** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: scim-m17n = scim-bridge -- After adding scim-m17n scim does not work automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204478] Re: Skim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language)
Is the automatically started program scim or skim? -- Skim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204478] Re: Skim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language)
Thanks for the clarification, and no need to be sorry. The one with a keyboard icon should be scim instead of skim. I'll change the bug description. Arne, I suspect this is related to scim-bridge's Qt4/KDE4 plugin, instead of scim itself. But I don't know scim-bridge or KDE4 enough to be sure. I'll leave it to you. ** Summary changed: - Skim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language) + Scim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language) -- Scim Starts Automatically Under KDE4 (Using English Only Language) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178388] Re: scim-hangul: Consolidate im-switch configurations
I didn't have time to work on this, have to postpone for hardy+1. ** Changed in: scim-hangul (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ming Hua (minghua) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Triaged -- scim-hangul: Consolidate im-switch configurations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119755] Re: scim works in koffice but not in openoffice
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 44626 Can't Input Japanese Text -- scim works in koffice but not in openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108503] Re: [apport] scim-panel-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV
Thanks for the reply, tobias. I'm closing this bug now. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [apport] scim-panel-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199030] Re: Can't close SCIM
Commets about the newly proposed patch by Arne: 1. The update-alternatives setting reset should be put into some if [ $1 = configure ]; ...; fi test, otherwise the command would be unconditionally executed, and not desired for situations such as abort- upgrade. 2. For the same reason, the old version $2 should be checked, so that it only attempts to do this heavy-handing fix when upgrading from known-to- be-broken versions. 3. I am still not quite sure whether preinst or postinst is the correct place. I would have put it in preinst. But this is a minor thing. -- Can't close SCIM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3635] Re: scim-setup isn't HIG compliant
The SCIM project is hosted on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/scim Their website is at: http://www.scim-im.org/ Note the mailing list only accepts mails from subscribers. The bug tracker should work, and the forum-to-mailing-list gateway should work too (but I never tried). -- scim-setup isn't HIG compliant https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201755] Re: Can not download package from repositiory
This is NOT a duplicate of bug #201673, but a consequence of an action preventing bug #201673 causing more damage (i.e., removing the problematic package from the archive). Now a newer and fixed version 2.7-9ubuntu2 has been uploaded to the archive, I'm marking this bug as fixed. Please update again and install the most recent version. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 201673 REGRESSION: glibc 2.7-9ubuntu1 NSS module broken due to toolchain changes ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Can not download package from repositiory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153055] Re: Firefox, Thunderbird crash if SCIM-Anthy is on
Jani, hardy has firefox 3.0 (beta3 for now), why are you still using 2.0.0.12? Do you have a fully updated hardy system? Or are you not using the firefox installed by Ubuntu, but using separately installed firefox instead? -- Firefox, Thunderbird crash if SCIM-Anthy is on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191451] Re: Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation
Hi Sebastien, hi Jean Christophe, My understanding (which may well be wrong) is that Jean Christophe doesn't like the VIQR input method provided by GTK+ to be enabled by default for Vietnamese locales. The input method is provided by file /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-viqr.so, and its default status can be seen from the following two lines in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0 /immodule-files.d/libgtk2.0-0.immodules: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-viqr.so viqr Vietnamese (VIQR) gtk20 /usr/share/locale vi -- Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100030] Re: Pure X windows applications don't accept SCIM input
Since bug #98890 has been closed, and Ryu Kent acknowledged this is the same issue of incorrect configuration file, I'm closing this bug as well. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Pure X windows applications don't accept SCIM input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191451] Re: Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation
Attached is my COMPLETELY UNTESTED patch to show what I think changes need to be done for GTK+. Please don't apply it unless some Vietnamese user has confirmed that it does what he/she desires. I also don't quite understand how input method choosing works after the backporting of the change in GTK+ 2.16 that makes the right-click menu shows System instead of what $GTK_IM_MODULE specifies, so this patch may be on the wrong path. Anyway, hope this at least helps the communication between the Vietnamese users and the GTK+ maintainers. ** Attachment added: UNTESTED patch to make viqr not default for vi locale http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12655417/disable-viqr-im-for-vi-locale.patch -- Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129243] Re: scim breaks suspend feature
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:55:33AM -, wolfger wrote: Not seeing why this bug was marked incomplete. You should only set incomplete if: -you have to ask the reporter questions -you ask the submitter to provide any necessary information in a comment Well, there are many questions that can be asked, such as the system locale, how scim was installed, and how it is automatically started, etc. But I am not interested in triaging each and every scim bug in Ubuntu, so I did not explicitly ask them. And I'm not going to argue about what status a bug should be at. I am marking it new again in the hopes somebody will pay attention to it. Good luck. Ming 2008.03.13 -- scim breaks suspend feature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129243 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202020] Re: /var/lib/dpkg/info/scim.postinst: 85: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting fi)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 202019 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202019 This bug has clearer description, so I've marked bug #202019 as a duplicate of this instead. -- /var/lib/dpkg/info/scim.postinst: 85: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting fi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202019] Re: package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 202020 /var/lib/dpkg/info/scim.postinst: 85: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting fi) -- package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202020] Re: /var/lib/dpkg/info/scim.postinst: 85: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting fi)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 202019 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202019 No problem at all. Thanks for the patch. -- /var/lib/dpkg/info/scim.postinst: 85: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting fi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202037] Re: package scim-bridge-client-gtk 0.4.14-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 202019 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202019 Thanks for the report. This is actually a bug in the scim package, instead of scim-bridge. And it has just been fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: scim-bridge = scim ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 202019 package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- package scim-bridge-client-gtk 0.4.14-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202037 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200111] Re: SCIM Help activated by default - cannot be closed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 199030 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199030 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 199030 Can't close SCIM -- SCIM Help activated by default - cannot be closed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199289] Re: Scim GUI Coming Up Automatically
The come back when exit part has been reported and discussed in bug #199030. -- Scim GUI Coming Up Automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190245] Re: [upgrade] merge request for scim to new debian revision
Version 1.4.7-3 was recently merged by Arne. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Arne Goetje (arnegoetje) Status: New = Fix Released -- [upgrade] merge request for scim to new debian revision https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191451] Re: Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation
I see. Since the input method provided by GTK+ and the one provided by scim-tables are both named viqr, I was misunderstanding the situation. -- Bad default choices for Vietnamese installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199314] Re: Hardy: SCIM support is easily triggered making system unusable
In bug #199030 Arne said that this is already fixed. Which version of scim and scim-bridge-client-gtk are people using when they experience this bug? -- Hardy: SCIM support is easily triggered making system unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199030] Re: Can't close SCIM
This bug is labeled Fix Released by a developer. If people are still seeing this bug with up-to-date hardy, please say so and I'll reopen this bug. -- Can't close SCIM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178726] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info()
Thanks for the investigation and the patch, David. I'll see if I can get apt-xapian-index synced to hardy. -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194731] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
Apt-xapian-index 0.6 has been recently synced in hardy. David, would you please test if this bug has been fixed? Thanks. -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194731 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178726] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info()
Apt-xapian-index 0.6 has been synced in hardy, and this is fixed for me. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ming Hua (minghua) Status: New = Fix Released -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98890] Re: SCIM wont work with Java
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:02:38PM -, Ryu Kent wrote: What version of Ubuntu are you using and in which applications? I am currently using hardy (will be 8.04), but I've been using Ubuntu and scim XIM mode since the early warty days and in almost every release, and the XIM mode has never been broken for me. I use GNOME and therefore use scim in many applications, such as firefox, gedit, pidgin, and OpenOffice. Altough I admit I've never tried using scim in a Java application. Ming 2008.03.03 -- SCIM wont work with Java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156868] Re: firefox extremely slow browsering chinese fonts webpages
This is not really a problem about xfont-wqy versions, but about packaging. The old Debian/Ubuntu package compresses the PCF fonts, which is the reason for the slow down. Now Debian has fixed this bug by using uncompressed PCF fonts, and Ubuntu hardy has synced the new version, so this bug is fixed in hardy, i.e., will be fixed when 8.04 is released. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #384149 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384149 ** Also affects: xfonts-wqy (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384149 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: xfonts-wqy (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ming Hua (minghua) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- firefox extremely slow browsering chinese fonts webpages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156868 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197562] [NEW] Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfonts-wqy This is a sync request for new Debian version (the same upstream version), so I assume it doesn't break Feature Freeze and needs no exception requests. If that's not the case, let me know. Source package name: xfonts-wqy Version to sync: 0.9.9-3 Place to sync from: Debian unstable main I did the previous 0.9.9-2ubuntu1 merge, the only change in 0.9.9-2ubuntu1 (compared with 0.9.9-2) is: - fixing the conffile handling so that package upgrading won't delete modified conffile (Debian bug 457423) - included in 0.9.9-3 version of Debian package - therefore can be dropped, so overriding Ubuntu change is OK The other new changes in 0.9.9-3 are: - patching the fontconfig configuration so that this font won't have high priorities in many locales (Debian bug 456376) - removing unused font alias file - reverting correct, but unnecessary (in the new Debian maintainer's opinion) documentation changes - adding watch file The first change is the main reason for this sync request. Without this fix, this font will become the default UI font for many users once it's installed, which is probably an unpleasant surprise. The debian/changelog entry for 0.9.9-3 is included below for reference: xfonts-wqy (0.9.9-3) unstable; urgency=low [ Deng Xiyue [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] * Move old conffile handling from postinst script to preinst script. Also check if the conffile is locally modified. If it is, back it up and tell the user to review the local changes and add it to the new conffile instead of just delete it. Thanks Ming Hua. (Closes: #457423) * Add watch file. * Modify upstream conffile by stripping the force priority part to meet debconf question. (Closes: #456376) * Use upstream alias file, remove debian/xfonts-wqy.alias. [ Cai Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] * New maintainer. * debian/patch/conf.patch: - deal with #456376. * README, AUTHOR: - keeped them as upstream. Have no idea why it has been modified before. -- Cai Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 11 Feb 2008 00:27:00 +0800 ** Affects: xfonts-wqy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173721] Re: Gnome keyboard layout options (like remapping Caps Lock) are not reapplied after reboot
I am just saying that my problem described above was indeed fixed after upgrading gnome-settings-daemon (among with other packages) quite a while ago, and it is still fine now (last upgraded on 2008.02.29, definitely post-alpha5). So it's very likely there are two different issues with similar symptom here. -- Gnome keyboard layout options (like remapping Caps Lock) are not reapplied after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178726] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info()
I can confirm that apt-xapian-index 0.6 from Debian unstable fixes this bug. Feature Freeze exception request filed as bug #197621. -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with NameError in info() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197621] Re: Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index
Upstream changes from 0.4 to 0.6: apt-xapian-index (0.6) unstable; urgency=low * Added --pkgfile option to index arbitrary Package files instead of the APT cache. -- Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:19:08 + apt-xapian-index (0.5) unstable; urgency=low * Updated XS-Vcs* fields to the new location in git under collab-maint * Cron job does not fail if the package is removed. Closes: #461571 * Fixed apttags.py plugin -- Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:28:14 + Diffstat for changes from 0.4 to 0.6: $ diffstat -p1 apt-xapian-index.debdiff .gitignore |4 README |4 ++-- debian/changelog| 15 +++ debian/control |6 +++--- debian/cron.weekly |4 +++- plugins/apttags.py | 43 +++ plugins/debtags.py | 13 + plugins/descriptions.py | 16 plugins/sizes.py| 21 + plugins/template.py | 14 ++ update-apt-xapian-index | 48 ++-- 11 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) ** Attachment added: The changes in debdiff format from 0.4 to 0.6 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12350809/apt-xapian-index.debdiff -- Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197621] [NEW] Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index Dear MOTU release team, I'd like to request a Feature Freeze exception for package apt-xapian- index. The current version in hardy is 0.4, while the current version in Debian unstable is 0.6. This is a new package introduced in hardy (doesn't exist in gutsy or earlier releases), the only reverse dependency is ept-cache, so the risk is relatively small. I don't know much about this package, but from what I can see, the version in hardy doesn't work at all. There are two crash bugs reported against it in LP (bug #178726 and bug #194731). I have confirmed that the new version in Debian unstable fixes #178726, and the reporter of #194731 says the new version fixes that bug as well. In my opinion it would be best to just sync the new version in Debian instead of trying to apply individual patches, since we are still before Beta release. The requested information for FF exception reqeust will be attached. Since it's a native package, the debian/changelog entries are provided as upstream changes. I've built the 0.6 version in a hardy pbuilder and installed it on a hardy system. It fixes the crash for me, and seems to be working fine. ** Affects: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197621] Re: Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index
** Attachment added: Build log in hardy pbuilder http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12350818/apt-xapian-index_0.6.pbuilder-log -- Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197621] Re: Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index
** Attachment added: Installation log on hardy system http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12350843/apt-xapian-index_0.6.install-log -- Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197562] Re: Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy main
I just noticed that xfonts-wqy was recently promoted from universe to main. I am just an MOTU, not a core developer, and I'm not sure I can request a sync for a main package. Anyway, if anything else needs to be done, let me know. ** Summary changed: - Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe + Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy main -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-3 from Debian unstable main to hardy main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197621] Re: Please sync apt-xapian-index 0.6 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe
** Summary changed: - Feature Freeze exception request for apt-xapian-index + Please sync apt-xapian-index 0.6 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index + This new version fixes at least two crash bugs. The full FF exception + request is kept below, and exception has been granted by the MOTU + release team. + + Source package name: apt-xapian-index + Version to sync: 0.6 + Place to sync from: Debian unstable main + + Dear MOTU release team, I'd like to request a Feature Freeze exception for package apt-xapian- index. The current version in hardy is 0.4, while the current version in Debian unstable is 0.6. This is a new package introduced in hardy (doesn't exist in gutsy or earlier releases), the only reverse dependency is ept-cache, so the risk is relatively small. I don't know much about this package, but from what I can see, the version in hardy doesn't work at all. There are two crash bugs reported against it in LP (bug #178726 and bug #194731). I have confirmed that the new version in Debian unstable fixes #178726, and the reporter of #194731 says the new version fixes that bug as well. In my opinion it would be best to just sync the new version in Debian instead of trying to apply individual patches, since we are still before Beta release. The requested information for FF exception reqeust will be attached. Since it's a native package, the debian/changelog entries are provided as upstream changes. I've built the 0.6 version in a hardy pbuilder and installed it on a hardy system. It fixes the crash for me, and seems to be working fine. -- Please sync apt-xapian-index 0.6 from Debian unstable main to hardy universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98890] Re: SCIM wont work with Java
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:43:46PM -, Ryu Kent wrote: It's related to that bug yes. And all the others posted about XIM. Basically the ubuntu SCIM package XIM section is broken and has been for over a year now. I would disagree. I use XIM all the time, even under GNOME, and it's been working for me in most situations, not broken at all. Of course there is bug #66104 which is occasionally quite annoying, but it can be easily worked around. Ming 2008.03.02 -- SCIM wont work with Java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181300] Re: Kubuntu East Asian language display and input not as good as Ubuntu
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 01:12:05AM -, Yao Ziyuan wrote: Also refer to SCIM's official configuration guide: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/InputMethods/SCIM/Setup This is just some documentation written by users on the wiki, and is by no means official. Ming 2008.03.02 -- Kubuntu East Asian language display and input not as good as Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to kubuntu-meta in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188910] Re: package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:42:02PM -, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 06 Feb 2008, Ming Hua wrote: shipped in texlive-latex-base (src:texlive-base) 2007-10; In hardy, this file is moved to texlive-formats-extra. No Replaces seems to exist in the Debian unstable, and it apparently isn't a big deal for Debian now (testing already has texlive-base 2007-13). Yes, I didn't introduce them because I uploaded the respective versions of -base and -extra at the same time, and ignored the problem that it takes different time to enter testing. This is tangent to the bug at hand, but I think it doesn't really matter when those packages enters testing. My understanding is that when you uploaded those two packages at the the same time, the upgrade path in unstable is immediately broken. Although broken upgrade in unstable only is usually not a big problem. Norbert, is it possible to add proper Replaces for Debian's texlive- formats-extra package? Or is Ubuntu on its own here? If you prefer I can add a Replaces, but is it really useful now? It is only for the development version, right? No, Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) was released with texlive-base 2007-10. Anyway, tell me and I will add it to the Debian pacakges next upload. We need this Replaces relation for a smooth gutsy-hardy upgrade. So if you can add it to the Debian texlive-formats-extra package (though I don't what exact version of texlive-latex-base it should replace), it would be very helpful. Ming 2008.02.09 -- package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190087] Re: test.tex
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:43:58PM -, Norbert Preining wrote: Aehm ... what did you expect with this document??? TeX Math fonts are NOT NOT NOT set up for usage with unicode. That is a fact. Forget anything in that document. UTF is supported in text mode for many characters but far from all. Yeah, after looking more carefully I think I see what the report wanted to do -- use the unicode character ρ instead of \rho in LaTeX math mode. Well, it won't surprise me it didn't work. I guess we can close this bug, if you want to improve this please change upstream's support for utf8 in math mode, but be prepared to learn loads of TeX and LaTeX internals. I'm marking it incomplete instead, since the reporter talks a lot about XeTeX. If the reporter can point at something saying this is supposed to work in XeTeX, we'll look into it more. Otherwise, for (La)TeX I agree this is not a bug, at least not an Ubuntu bug (should be a wishlist bug for LaTeX upstream to improve UTF-8 support instead). Ming 2008.02.09 -- None of the TeX engines installed in texlive-full know where any of the fonts are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137784] Re: [Gutsy] texlive-base-bin post-installation error
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:36:17AM -, pfissure wrote: I have had a similar problem in upgrading to gutsy and texlive. However, the fixes proposed for others have not worked for me. Since there have been multiple confirmation that reinstalling packages fixes this problem, you are likely experiencing a complete different problem. Please file a separate bug. Ming 2008.02.09 -- [Gutsy] texlive-base-bin post-installation error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190087] Re: None of the TeX engines installed in texlive-full know where any of the fonts are
** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- None of the TeX engines installed in texlive-full know where any of the fonts are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157163] Re: texlive-base-bin cannot be installed
Does this bug still exist? Can people install rosegarden in hardy now? -- texlive-base-bin cannot be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188910] Re: package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:01:04AM -, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sa, 09 Feb 2008, Ming Hua wrote: when those packages enters testing. My understanding is that when you uploaded those two packages at the the same time, the upgrade path in unstable is immediately broken. Although broken upgrade in unstable No it wasn't, because normally the packages were installed at the same time. Anyway. Hmm, I see that texlive-formats-extra depends on texlive-latex-base (= 2007-11), so yeah, they need to be upgraded at the same time. I think the problem here is that during upgrade, texlive-formats-extra is unpacked before texlive-latex-base is unpacked (this is possible because dependency is only required to be satified when configure happens, which is after unpacking). Therefore, a Replaces is still desired because it make sure the upgrade succeeds. We need this Replaces relation for a smooth gutsy-hardy upgrade. So Good argument. I have added texlive-formats-extra replaces texlive-latex-base (= 2007-10) that should do it for gutsy, right? Yes, looks correct to me. Thanks! Ming 2008.02.09 -- package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157163] Re: texlive-base-bin cannot be installed
Thanks for the reply. Closing. ** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: rosegarden (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- texlive-base-bin cannot be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190087] Re: None of the TeX engines installed in texlive-full know where any of the fonts are
Good to see agreement is achieved. Closing this bug. ** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- None of the TeX engines installed in texlive-full know where any of the fonts are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88845] Re: activating Fcitx causes programs closed
Did this bug still exist for Feisty final release? And more importantly, can you test fcitx with the most recent releast, Gutsy (7.10)? -- activating Fcitx causes programs closed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53407] Re: SCIM help dialogue for scim-skk is in Japanese
Upstream CVS should be http://cvs.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi /scim-imengine/scim-skk/ and the awk script and help message source file seem to be there. -- SCIM help dialogue for scim-skk is in Japanese https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188093] Re: [needs-sync] xtide-data-20070318-1 from sid
Yeah, just revert the changes in -1ubuntu1 and upload as -1ubuntu2. -- [needs-sync] xtide-data-20070318-1 from sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188086] Re: [needs-merge] xtide-2.9.5-2 from sid
I meant xtide 2.9.5-2ubuntu1 and xtide-data 20070318-1ubuntu2. -- [needs-merge] xtide-2.9.5-2 from sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188086] Re: [needs-merge] xtide-2.9.5-2 from sid
If Debian's xtide-data is uploaded as 20070318-1ubuntu2 (since removing already uploaded version is very unlikely), will the dependencies still work (i.e., xtide 2.9.5-2 and xtide-data 20070318-1ubuntu2 in hardy)? -- [needs-merge] xtide-2.9.5-2 from sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188910] Re: package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-
Hi Norbert, Which package should we pull? This bug happened when upgrading texlive- formats-extra (src:texlive-extra) from 2007-3 to 2007.dfsg.1-1, and Debian unstable also has texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.1-1. -- package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188910] Re: package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-
Okay, I think I can identify the problem now. In gutsy, /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini is shipped in texlive-latex-base (src:texlive-base) 2007-10; In hardy, this file is moved to texlive-formats-extra. No Replaces seems to exist in the Debian unstable, and it apparently isn't a big deal for Debian now (testing already has texlive-base 2007-13). Norbert, is it possible to add proper Replaces for Debian's texlive- formats-extra package? Or is Ubuntu on its own here? -- package texlive-formats-extra None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/mllatex.ini', which is also in package texlive-latex-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77168] Re: KDE: Scim Accented characters
Well, in that case, I have no idea what the problem is, it may not be the same problem as Debian's #348893 at all. Cablop's most recent procedure is too complicated for me to reproduce. Hope someone else can try reproducing it and pinpoint the bug. Also, my request about testing with GTK_IM_MODULE=scim and QT_IM_MODULE=scim remains unanswered. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = New -- KDE: Scim Accented characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173721] Re: Gnome keyboard layout options (like remapping Caps Lock) are not reapplied after reboot
Just a me too note to say I started experiencing the same problem after upgrading gnome-control-center to version 1:2.21.90-0ubuntu1 and installing gnome-settings-daemon. I am using a US keyboard layout and my Use capslock as ctrl key option doesn't have any effect after login. Changing it away and back again in GNOME's keyboard setting makes it work. I didn't have this problem before this recent upgrade. The system is upgraded from gutsy pretty early (before alpha 1 release), and I keep a quite up-to-date system, at least an upgrade per week. -- Gnome keyboard layout options (like remapping Caps Lock) are not reapplied after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181300] Re: Kubuntu East Asian language display and input not as good as Ubuntu
Scim-chinese is the old source package name of scim-pinyin. It's irrelevant here. ** Changed in: scim-chinese (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Kubuntu East Asian language display and input not as good as Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148113] Re: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _XimServerDestroy()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 130969 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130969 It is known that killing the XIM server program often crashes the X application (which would be an XIM client). It applies to all XIM servers, not only scim. I don't think this bug should be assigned to (only) scim. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 130969 gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _XimServerDestroy() -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _XimServerDestroy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77168] Re: KDE: Scim Accented characters
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:36:21PM -, cablop wrote: I think, we maybe must add this bug to KDE to. I don't think so. Why? I was thinking in this bug for some time, and I think, if I can write the accents in the way I described earlier, then SCIM active works well with KDE, then, where's the problem? Not in SCIM itself, but in the way SCIM and KDE works when SCIM is NOT active. As I've said above, it's a known bug in scim, and it doesn't happen for the default settings in new gutsy installs. Ming 2008.02.03 -- KDE: Scim Accented characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103492] Re: [can-not-install] file overwrite error
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:55:50AM -, Andrea Gasparini wrote: It seems to me that either gutsy and hardy have a fixed version. It's true that this bug doesn't apply to gutsy or hardy, but strictly speaking, it's not fixed ther per se, only that the file-overwriting doesn't happen because the packages are updated. ** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released Ming 2008.02.03 -- [can-not-install] file overwrite error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178742] Please apply patch to SCIM for Java clients
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -, Masaki wrote: Binary package hint: scim SCIM is not working properly when it's using on Java client e.g. NetBeans IDE. This problem happens on Ubuntu, but does not happen on Fedora Core because Fedora is applying a patch to SCIM. Why is this patch not sent to upstream? Or did I miss it? Ming 2008.02.04 -- Please apply patch to SCIM for Java clients https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178742 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130969] Re: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _XimServerDestroy()
It is known that killing the XIM server program often crashes the X application (which would be an XIM client). It applies to all XIM servers, not only scim. I don't think this bug should be assigned to (only) scim. It also only happens for XIM mode. Scim provides other input method modes that don't have this problem. -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _XimServerDestroy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178742] Re: Please apply patch to SCIM for Java clients
Yes, I meant SCIM upstream. As the Debian maintainer, I don't know much about the scim code myself, so I'm very careful about applying patches. When Fedora is a respectable distribution and their patch should be well tested, if you the SCIM upstream can accept this patch into SVN or give a nod to this patch, it will make me more willing to include this patch in the Debian package (and hopefully, later inherited by Ubuntu package as well). -- Please apply patch to SCIM for Java clients https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178742 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144171] Re: package libsuitesparse 3.0.0-3 failed to install/upgrade:
There was indeed a problem in gusty's version, but already fixed in hardy's 3.0.0-7 version. In hardy the libsuitesparse package Conflicts and Replaces libumfpack4. Are you having the same problem? Do you have the full log of the upgrade? What is the reason libsuitesparse failed to install/upgrade? ** Changed in: suitesparse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- package libsuitesparse 3.0.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185653] Re: [MoM SYNC] octave3.0 3.0.0-1
Yes, my concerns are in the comments of bug #178424. The problem is not as simple as a new octave package depending on octave3.0. There are quite a few reverse(-build)-dependencies. We also should think what to do with octave2.9. Leaving both in an LTS release doesn't seem wise to me. I still think it's best to ask Debian octave team first. -- [MoM SYNC] octave3.0 3.0.0-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183384] Re: [hardy] octave 3.0 is out
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 185959 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185959 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 178424 Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 185959 octave3.0 transition -- [hardy] octave 3.0 is out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178424] Re: Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 185959 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185959 Since \sh is working on the octave2.9 - octave3.0 transition and tracking the status in bug #185959, let's mark this bug as a duplicate of that one. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 185959 octave3.0 transition -- Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184502] Re: Nautilus exhibits odd behavior when installing language support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66104 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66104 Know problem. Please refer to bug #66104 (this bug has been marked as a duplicate of it) for more information and follow up there. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 66104 [Gutsy] scim: input freezes in various applications under XIM mode -- Nautilus exhibits odd behavior when installing language support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184065] Re: LaTex produces wrong symbols
The file mentioned in the report is /usr/share/texmf- tetex/tex/latex/txfonts/txfonts.sty, which belongs to tetex-extra in Debian etch. Why is this bug assigned to texlive-base pacakge? The teTeX stuff is mostly obsoleted (both in Debian and Ubuntu) anyway. To bug reporter Morris Hirsch -- what is the Ubuntu release you are using? Ubuntu 6.06 (dapper)? -- LaTex produces wrong symbols https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132564] Re: Second SCIM Applet appears when Synaptic Package Manager is Launched
Yes, GTK_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge will likely trigger the same problem. GTK_IM_MODULE=xim (which should be the gutsy default) won't. -- Second SCIM Applet appears when Synaptic Package Manager is Launched https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132564 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181836] Re: Gutsy - Hardy upgrade: file conflict in openoffice.org-base-core and openoffice.org-core
Luca Falavigna wrote: Add a Conflicts/Replaces: openoffice-org-base ( 1:2.3.1-1) for openoffice.org-base-core should fix this issue. No. The file openoffice.org-base-core is trying to overwrite is from old openoffice.org-core, not openoffice.org-base. -- Gutsy - Hardy upgrade: file conflict in openoffice.org-base-core and openoffice.org-core https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181029] Re: [FTBFS] scim-bridge (0.4.14-1) fails to build in hardy
ZhengPeng Hou wrote: and also it will change the upstream source tarball What is this referring to? Deleting empty files in po/ at build time (clean target in debian/rules) won't change the *.orig.tar.gz upstream tarball at all. -- [FTBFS] scim-bridge (0.4.14-1) fails to build in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182112] Re: ess new version available
It seems nobody is actively maintaining this package in Debian/Ubuntu. Yang Zhao, are you willing to help maintaining it in Ubuntu? ** Changed in: ess (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: New = Confirmed -- ess new version available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180584] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach()
Right, so auto retracing failed for this one as well. Let's close this bug for now. I'll reopen it if I can reproduce it and obtain a useful backtrace. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180584 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85474] Re: Maxima frontends cannot connect
** Changed in: wxmaxima (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Maxima frontends cannot connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85474] Re: Maxima frontends cannot connect
Bloodsucker, please report new bugs instead of changing already closed bug. ** Changed in: wxmaxima (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: maxima = wxmaxima -- Maxima frontends cannot connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178424] Re: Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
First the disclaimer that I am not an Octave user and doesn't know about Debian's octave packaging. On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:26:08PM -, Daniel Holbach wrote: Ming: Aren't the two packages installable in parallel? (Like cyrus2.1 and cyrus2.2?) If so, users will have to do the upgrade manually, no? Looking at the installed file list, yes, they seem to be installable in parallel. However, Debian maintainers never intended to support (in a stable release sense) both octave2.9 and octave3.0, they filed the Request for Removal bug for octave2.9 the same day octave3.0 enters unstable. My upgrade path comment is mainly about the octave meta-package. Now both unstable and hardy's octave depends on octave2.9. With octave3.0 installed, you need to use octave3.0 command to invoke the 3.0 version. To make my position clear: I am all for including octave 3.0 in hardy, however to sync the unstable package as is doesn't seem to be an adequate, or even correct solution. I'm merely asking for more discussion on this issue. Ming 2008.01.09 -- Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178424] Re: Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:23:44AM -0600, I wrote: First the disclaimer that I am not an Octave user and doesn't know about Debian's octave packaging. On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:26:08PM -, Daniel Holbach wrote: Ming: Aren't the two packages installable in parallel? (Like cyrus2.1 and cyrus2.2?) If so, users will have to do the upgrade manually, no? Looking at the installed file list, yes, they seem to be installable in parallel. Uhm, on a closer look, octave3.0 Conflicts/Replaces/Provides octave2.9. So no, they are not installable in parallel. Ming 2008.01.09 -- Please sync octave3.0 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181481] Re: [boot-internet-gutsy]Slow down when computer is not connected on internet
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 181475 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181475 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 181475 [boot-internet-gutsy]Slow down when computer is not connected on internet -- [boot-internet-gutsy]Slow down when computer is not connected on internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181481 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181029] Re: [FTBFS] scim-bridge (0.4.14-1) fails to build in hardy
The analysis is correct. However the POT file is intentionally left empty by upstream. Maybe the whole po/ directory should be removed. ** Changed in: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [FTBFS] scim-bridge (0.4.14-1) fails to build in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179725] Re: ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #459438 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459438 ** Also affects: texlive-base (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459438 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179725] Re: ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts
Norbert, thanks for the TeX-related bug triaging work you've been doing.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:44:40PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
(Dominique:) We got the following bug report which relates to the ucs
package. It seems that the mentioned sung bitmap font is not available,
while the arphic fonts are widely available and packaged for at least
Debian and Ubuntu (and for sure for many others, too).
I know the Arphic fonts are available in Fedora (though probably not
installed by default) in TTF form, but not sure if they have the LaTeX
format (Type1?) packaged. The Debian/Ubuntu packages are made from TTF
files using fontforge.
Also, if it is decided to make such change, I would like to ask if it's
possible to consider satisfying both the similified Chinese users (use
gbsn, provided by Debian's latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-gbsn00lp package)
and the tranditional Chinese users (use bsmi, provided by Debian's
latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bsmi00 package).
--- usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ucs/c00enc.def_orig 2006-05-15
21:12:54.0 +0200
+++ usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ucs/c00enc.def2008-01-01
21:20:38.0 +0100
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@
%%
\ProvidesFile{c00enc.def}[2001/10/11 Fontencoding C00 (Big5)]%
\DeclareFontEncoding{C00}{}{}%
-\DeclareFontSubstitution{C00}{song}{m}{n}%
+\DeclareFontSubstitution{C00}{bsmi}{m}{n}%
\input{cenccmn.tex}%
-\expandafter\let\csname C00/song/m/n\endcsname\undefined
+\expandafter\let\csname C00/bsmi/m/n\endcsname\undefined
Ming
2008.01.06
--
ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179725
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180584] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166209/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166210/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166211/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166212/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166213/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166214/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11166215/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180584 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180584] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I had a nautilus window open (in browser mode), then in command-line (gnome-terminal) moved a file out of the folder currently displayed in nautilus. The crash happened immediately after, I suspect it's related. Bug #174049 is segfaulting at the same function, but the retrace failed. Let's see if this one is more lucky. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 5 09:19:01 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom Package: nautilus 1:2.20.0-2ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: nautilus --no-desktop file:///home/minghua-grumpy ProcCwd: /home/minghua-grumpy ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus Stacktrace: #0 0xb7552782 in g_slist_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0xb769cf1f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #2 0x0031 in ?? () #3 0xb769ced0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #4 0x in ?? () StacktraceTop: g_slist_foreach () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 ?? () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach() Uname: Linux plateau 2.6.24-2-generic #1 SMP Thu Dec 20 17:36:12 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner src video ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-i386-retrace -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_foreach() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180584 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179158] Re: PMT in formula giving #NAME?
Seems to be fixed in hardy. On my hardy system with gnumeric-plugins- extra installed, it gives the answer ($1,142). -- PMT in formula giving #NAME? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178713] Re: Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 178702 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178702 The last ubuntu change to fix usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/ directory is now applied to Debian. This is not true. See the changelog of my 0.9.9-2ubuntu1 upload for more detail. -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178713 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178702] Re: Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
The changelog in this bug report is also wrong. It listed the whole changelog instead of the entries since last Ubuntu upload (which would be only 0.9.9-1 and 0.9.9-2). -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178702] Re: Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I am rejecting this bug as I've just uploaded 0.9.9-2ubuntu1, merging Debian changes and adding proper conffile handling. The changelog is: xfonts-wqy (0.9.9-2ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable, dropping all previous Ubuntu changes: - Build-depend on xfonts-utils ( 4.0.3). Hardy has high enough version so the version requirement can be dropped. - Build-depend on debhelper (= 5.0.7) instead of (= 5.0.31). This is an error in previous merges, because debhelper (= 5.0.31) is needed for dh_installxfonts to recognize the new font layout used in X11R7. - Install fonts in /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/ directory instead of /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/. This is a completely bogus change, as pre-X11R7 layout uses /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, and new layout uses /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/ as Debian specified. The /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/ directory doesn't seem to be recognized by anything. This change actually breaks the package because fonts.dir and fonts.alias files are not automatically generated, and X won't load the fonts from the wrong directory. * Move old conffile handling from postinst script to preinst script. Also check if the conffile is locally modified. If it is, back it up and tell the user to review the local changes and add it to the new conffile instead of just delete it. (Debian bug #457423) * Change the Maintainer field in debian/control to Ubuntu MOTU Developers, and move Debian's maintainer to XSBC-Original-Maintainer field, according to the specification. -- Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 01 Jan 2008 05:35:54 -0600 ** Changed in: xfonts-wqy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34282] Re: [Gutsy Feisty Edgy Dapper] language-support-any CJK language doesn't set up a way to input this language with scim if the session doesn't correspond to this particular CJK (Chinese,
Jan Ask wrote: CJK language support tested on Ubuntu Gutsy daily build 30 Dec 2007. What does Gutsy daily build mean? Did you mean hardy? Or gutsy release (7.10)? -- [Gutsy Feisty Edgy Dapper] language-support-any CJK language doesn't set up a way to input this language with scim if the session doesn't correspond to this particular CJK (Chinese, Japanese or Korean) language https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179296] Re: Please merge gnome-chemistry-utils 0.8.4-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
What is the point of pasting debdiffs without addressing other people's question? The only functional part of the debdiff is simply adding firefox as an *alternative* of gcu-plugin's dependency. What is the rationale for this change? -- Please merge gnome-chemistry-utils 0.8.4-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178702] Re: Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Gutsy's 0.7.0-6-2ubuntu1 also has the change usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/ instead of usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/. Debian #457423 should also be fixed, IMHO. -- Please sync xfonts-wqy 0.9.9-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148498] Re: sudo asks for wrong password
Patrick's patch has been acceptted by Debian and included in version 1.6.9p10-1. We may want to consider merging the new version from Debian. ** Also affects: sudo (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454409 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- sudo asks for wrong password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158931] Re: scim hotkeys doesn't work
I don't see anything wrong with the hotkey settings and don't know what is wrong either. The only suggestion I can give is to try Live CD with en_US locale. I'm setting the bug status back to New as it has enough clarification now. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- scim hotkeys doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176660] Re: im-switch: Upgrade problem from dapper to gutsy/hardy
This is the updated debdiff against Debian unstable. Please use -v 1.14 when uploading to include all relevant changelog entries. ** Attachment added: updated debdiff, between 1.16 and 1.16ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11087234/LP176660_im-switch-upgrade.debdiff ** Attachment removed: debdiff between 1.14 and 1.14ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11028930/LP176660_im-switch- upgrade.debdiff -- im-switch: Upgrade problem from dapper to gutsy/hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178697] Re: Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Note that edgy-feisty upgrade was broken for similar reason, see bug #103492. -- Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178697] Re: Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I disagree with the sync. Dapper has scim-bridge package, which builds a single binary package scim-bridge. Now the Debian package builds four binary packages, none of which is named scim-bridge, while overwriting files used to be shipped by dapper's scim-bridge. Without proper Conflicts/Replaces relationship, dapper-hardy upgrades will be broken. -- Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178697] Re: Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Actually, after checking, I found that dapper's scim-bridge binary package has NO file overlapping with 0.4.14-1's four binary packages. So my previous statement was wrong, no Conflicts/Replaces relationship is necessary. However, dapper users who installed scim-bridge will be left with no upgrade path. -- Please sync scim-bridge 0.4.14-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
