Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO4.2 pdf export embeds all fonts...

2014-02-26 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Pedro pedl...@gmail.com on Wed, 26 Feb 2014
17:50:37 -0800 (PST)

LO 4.1.5 still has the Embed Standard Fonts option. It is 4.2.1 that took
it out.

Cliff

 Hi again Raymond
 
 
 r_ouellette wrote
  Strangely I'm unable to create a Bugzilla account! The system didn't reply
  to my request...
 
 You should check your Spam mailbox as Tom suggested.
 
 Regarding font embedding I just reported a similar font embedding problem in
 ODF files
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75553
 
 However using the example file
 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2347109/Font_embedding_in_ODF_1.2_LO414.odt
 I can't replicate the PDF export problem you mentioned. Maybe it just occurs
 with more complex documents?
 
 Curiously Apache OpenOffice already includes an Embed standard fonts
 option (unchecked by default, as expected) in the PDF Options when exporting
 to PDF...
 
 Maybe someone from LO development can reuse the already existing code?
 
 Cheers,
 Pedro

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.2.1 Issues

2014-02-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com on Tue, 25
Feb 2014 09:22:49 +0100

 Le 24/02/2014 15:56, Cliff Scott a écrit :
 
 Hi Cliff,
 
  Part of the issue is that the Calibre Light font in the frame that goes
  partially across both columns is not found by LO as a separate font from
  Calibre. For some reason LO after ver 4.0.5 does not parse the Calibre Light
  font properly. I had this back in 4.1.3, 4.1.4 and now also 4.1.5. The
  problem was discussed on this list back in November and a work around was
  found, but that doesn't change the problem with 4.2.1. LO 4.1.5 handles the
  unrecognized font just fine and the text still fits in the frame with the
  substitution of what ever font LO comes up with, but 4.2.1 displays it 
  larger
  so it extends outside the frame and still has the problem with not
  recognizing the font. I can make it fit by resizing the frame horizontally,
  but then the other text is push around and doesn't fit properly on the page.
  I was really hoping that the font recognizing problem would be fixed in
  4.2.1, but obviously not. The problem is a known bug and I added my 2 cents
  to it on the bugtracker back in November. It doesn't make sense to me that
  the same document would load differently in the two versions since they use
  the same user preferences.
 
 
 The problem with font weight recognition in certain fonts is a known
 bug, but I can't remember the issue number at the moment. I saw it being
 discussed on one of the IRC channels the other day. No idea, when or
 whether it will be fixed though.
 

The really frustrating part is that ApacheOO handles the fonts just fine.
Even better than the older versions of LO. I can only assume that it was an
accidental result of some other change. I sure hope someone takes it on to
fix soon. LO is so much better than AOO that I don't want to go back.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.2.1 Issues

2014-02-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com on Tue, 25 Feb 2014
18:26:54 +

Tom,

My main question originally was regarding why LO 4.1.5 opened the document
just fine and LO 4.2.1 didn't. Both installed on the same machine so using
identical preferences and both substituted a font for the missing font.
Something is different on 4.2.1 that makes the text take slightly more room
on the page. Which one is correct I don't know, but in that document LO 4.1.5
works and LO 4.2.1 doesn't.

As far as AOO goes the font parsing has always worked as far as I know.
Somehow LO broke it partially early on and really broke it after LO 4.0.5.

I would love to have it fixed soon, but it seems to me that when it gets
fixed is anyone's guess as it has been broken for some time now.

Cliff

 Hi :)
 Both programs use the same default format and since both can be
 installed alongside each othe (but you'll need the wiki guide to help
 do so).
 
 So it should be reasonably possible to use LibreOffice to write the
 document and then OpenOffice to read and print it.
 
 Also given the pace of development in LibreOffice it seem likely that
 it could be fixed reasonably soon, especially if the bug-report makes
 it clear it's something that is already fixed in AOO.
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 
 On 25 February 2014 16:17, Uli ulg...@gmx.net wrote:
  Am 25.02.2014 09:22, schrieb Alex Thurgood:
 
  Le 24/02/2014 15:56, Cliff Scott a écrit :
 
  Hi Cliff,
 
  Part of the issue is that the Calibre Light font in the frame that goes
  partially across both columns is not found by LO as a separate font from
  Calibre. For some reason LO after ver 4.0.5 does not parse the Calibre
  Light
  font properly. I had this back in 4.1.3, 4.1.4 and now also 4.1.5. The
  problem was discussed on this list back in November and a work around was
  found, but that doesn't change the problem with 4.2.1. LO 4.1.5 handles
  the
  unrecognized font just fine and the text still fits in the frame with the
  substitution of what ever font LO comes up with, but 4.2.1 displays it
  larger
  so it extends outside the frame and still has the problem with not
  recognizing the font. I can make it fit by resizing the frame
  horizontally,
  but then the other text is push around and doesn't fit properly on the
  page.
  I was really hoping that the font recognizing problem would be fixed in
  4.2.1, but obviously not. The problem is a known bug and I added my 2
  cents
  to it on the bugtracker back in November. It doesn't make sense to me
  that
  the same document would load differently in the two versions since they
  use
  the same user preferences.
 
 
 
  The problem with font weight recognition in certain fonts is a known
  bug, but I can't remember the issue number at the moment. I saw it being
  discussed on one of the IRC channels the other day. No idea, when or
  whether it will be fixed though.
 
  Alex
 
 
  Maybe it's similar to Bug 68467? It's about Frutiger font, but have a look
  at the attachments, which show the faults.
 
  Uli

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] LO 4.2.1 Issues

2014-02-24 Thread Cliff Scott
Tried LO 4.2.1 this evening for the first time on my Mac with OSx 10.9.1. I
loaded a newsletter that I published last year because it was the type of
document that I often deal with. I found that the newsletter opens fine in LO
4.1.5, but does not load properly in 4.2.1 and also locks up when resizing a
frame. The Document is 2 columns with a Frame that goes across both columns
as well as a number of pictures in the columns.

Part of the issue is that the Calibre Light font in the frame that goes
partially across both columns is not found by LO as a separate font from
Calibre. For some reason LO after ver 4.0.5 does not parse the Calibre Light
font properly. I had this back in 4.1.3, 4.1.4 and now also 4.1.5. The
problem was discussed on this list back in November and a work around was
found, but that doesn't change the problem with 4.2.1. LO 4.1.5 handles the
unrecognized font just fine and the text still fits in the frame with the
substitution of what ever font LO comes up with, but 4.2.1 displays it larger
so it extends outside the frame and still has the problem with not
recognizing the font. I can make it fit by resizing the frame horizontally,
but then the other text is push around and doesn't fit properly on the page.
I was really hoping that the font recognizing problem would be fixed in
4.2.1, but obviously not. The problem is a known bug and I added my 2 cents
to it on the bugtracker back in November. It doesn't make sense to me that
the same document would load differently in the two versions since they use
the same user preferences.

Problem #2 is that when resizing the frame vertically LO 4.2.1 goes bananas
and makes the 3 page document a 5 page document and then locks up. I have to
force quit it to get out of it. This is a problem I've never seen before in
LO.

Has anyone seen either of these problems in 4.2.1? I know it is early in the
series so I expect some issues, but would like to know if they are only my
issues or what. Thanks.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Export PDF

2014-02-11 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from r_ouellette ray.ouelle...@sympatico.ca on Mon, 10
Feb 2014 12:10:19 -0800 (PST)

Raymond,

Thanks for the tip. I'm assuming that you are referring to the PDF/A-1a
format regarding the fonts being included in the PDF. The only one that makes
a real difference in appearance is Courier New is much lighter than Courier.
The other two are virtually identical, at least at 12pt so for most work
those substitutions would work fine.

Cliff


 I create pdf files since 1997 and I tried almost every possible way to do so
 (Linux or Windows softwares). LO does one of the best job!
 
 If you want really small and efficient pdf, do the following :
 
 Menu  Tools  Options  Fonts
 
 and add these 3 substitutions (even if you don't have these fonts installed
 on your PC):
 
 Arial  Helvetica
 Courier New  Courier
 Times  Times New Roman
 
 and check « Allways » in front of each substitution.
 
 This way you will use the always included 35 Type1 Adobe fonts that every
 pdf reader provides and uses. True, Times is not Times New Roman but closely
 related. You can do, of course, the same substitutions with the equivalent
 Liberation fonts too, so Liberation Sans  Helvetica... etc. The Type1 fonts
 to use are Helvetica, Courier and Times.
 
 Try to create a pdf with these substitutions on and with substitutions off,
 you'll be surprised how small your pdf can be when the ttf fonts are not
 embeded. Don't forget that the substitutions are not possible if you embed
 the ODF document in the pdf (hybrid pdf) because all fonts are then
 embedded.
 
 This is another option that should appear by default, with the « always »
 choice unchecked but visible to give the user a real choice.
 
 Raymond

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Fit Text to Contour

2014-02-11 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Jean-Francois Nifenecker
jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:33:15 +0100

Hi Jean-Francois,

Ok. I haven't used Draw very much at all. F2 was the key. Interesting that if
I use the Fontworks Gallery in Writer then the Fontwork functions will let me
modify that to my hearts content. The only thing I can't do is to enter the
free form line and get text to associate with it.

Thanks for hanging in there with me. Your help is much appreciated.

Cliff

 Hello Cliff,
 
 Le 11/02/2014 03:29, Cliff Scott a écrit :
  
  Tried that and somehow I'm missing something important. I draw a line using
  the Freeform Line tool from the Draw toolbar. I then use the text tool 
  from
  the Draw toolbar to enter text. 
 
 Nope. You select the line and hit F2, so that the text box associated
 with the line opens, then you enter the text :)
 I guess I didn't make me clear enough. Perhaps the verb associated is
 not the right one...
 
  This takes me back to the same problem as I had initially, how do I get the
  text to be associated with the line. Writer will not let me select both the
  text box and the line at the same time. Could you give me a detailed step by
  step what works on your system? Thanks.
 
 see above.
 
 HTH,
 -- 
 Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Fit Text to Contour

2014-02-10 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Jean-Francois Nifenecker
jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net on Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:36:54 +0100

 Better late than  never...
 
 Le 24/01/2014 04:39, Cliff Scott a écrit :
  I'm trying to use Draw to make up some text to put around pictures in 
  Writer. 
  
  The help says: 
  Adjust to contour - Adapts the text flow so that it matches the 
  contours of
  the selected drawing
  object.
  
  For the life of me I can't figure how to connect the text to a shape. I have
  a text box with text in it and a curve that I drew, but to get the text to
  follow that curve seems beyond me. I've selected the shape and gone to the
  menu Format/Text and selected adjust to contour as it says to do, but 
  nothing
  happens. 
  
 
 You'll get what you're looking if you add the Fontwork *toolbutton* (not
 Fontwork Toolbar) by:
 
 a. Tools  Customize.
 b. In Toolbars page select the toolbar you want to add the button to
 then click Add.
 c. In the new dialog, select the Format category, Fontwork command.
 Validate
 
 Now you've got the right tool to get going.
 
 Usage:
 1. draw a line or a shape.
 2. enter the associated text to the line/shape, as usual
 3. click the Fontwork button and enjoy!
 
 HTH,

 Jean-Francois,

Thank you very much for coming back to me on this. I had given up on getting
any help. I did as you said and it works pretty well, but takes some getting
used to it characteristics. One question remains: Is there a way to put the
text on a free form line or only on the shapes the Fontwork Button dialog box
has?

Thanks.
Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Export PDF

2014-02-10 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Marcello Romani mrom...@ottotecnica.com on Mon, 10
Feb 2014 08:28:09 +0100

 Il 08/02/2014 23:40, Cliff Scott ha scritto:
  I've run into a strange occurrence in LO 4.1.4. Everytime I export to PDF I
  get a error message that PDF/A-1a forbids a transparency. Clicking OK
  allows the export to continue and I don't see any problems in the resultant
  PDF, but this is something I've only seen on 4.1.4. This happens with Writer
  and Calc. FYI, I'm running OSx Mavericks. Is this a known problem?
 
  Cliff
 
 
 Take this with a grain of salt, as I'm running LO 3.5.7.2 (stock Ubu 
 12.04), but I think you could get away with it by unchecking the 
 PDF/A-1a checkbox under File-Export as PDF... The option should 
 stick, so LO should produce PDF with transparencies with no fuss from 
 there on.
 
 My 2 cents.

Thanks for your 2 cents.

It does, in fact, not have any problems using the other PDF modes. Guess
Tagged mode is the standard these days anyhow.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Fit Text to Contour

2014-02-10 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Jean-Francois Nifenecker
jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net on Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:20:10 +0100

 Le 10/02/2014 16:59, Cliff Scott a écrit :
 
  One question remains: Is there a way to put the
  text on a free form line or only on the shapes the Fontwork Button dialog 
  box
  has?
 
 Yes, of course. Just draw a line by hand and associate (enter) the text
 you want. While it is selected, call the Fontwork tool. There, do *not*
 use the upper rounded shapes. Instead, use directly one of the four
 tools just below to setup the text along the line you drew.
 You should achieve what you're looking for.
 

 Jean-Francois 

Tried that and somehow I'm missing something important. I draw a line using
the Freeform Line tool from the Draw toolbar. I then use the text tool from
the Draw toolbar to enter text. When I enter the text the Fontwork window
opens. I then choose one of the 4 tools you suggest and the text follows the
contour of the text box. The line is totally ignored. If I select the line
the Fontworks tool is grayed out and unavailable.

This takes me back to the same problem as I had initially, how do I get the
text to be associated with the line. Writer will not let me select both the
text box and the line at the same time. Could you give me a detailed step by
step what works on your system? Thanks.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Export PDF

2014-02-08 Thread Cliff Scott
I've run into a strange occurrence in LO 4.1.4. Everytime I export to PDF I
get a error message that PDF/A-1a forbids a transparency. Clicking OK
allows the export to continue and I don't see any problems in the resultant
PDF, but this is something I've only seen on 4.1.4. This happens with Writer
and Calc. FYI, I'm running OSx Mavericks. Is this a known problem?

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Export PDF

2014-02-08 Thread Cliff Scott

 Cley Faye cleyf...@gmail.com wrote:

 2014-02-08 23:40 GMT+01:00 Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com:

  I've run into a strange occurrence in LO 4.1.4. Everytime I export to PDF I
  get a error message that PDF/A-1a forbids a transparency. Clicking OK
  allows the export to continue and I don't see any problems in the resultant
  PDF, but this is something I've only seen on 4.1.4. This happens with
  Writer
  and Calc. FYI, I'm running OSx Mavericks. Is this a known problem?
 
 
 ?I can tell you that it did happen with previous versions. It's only shown
 if you have transparent items in the document, so it might not show up all
 the time.
 
 Now, to know what is transparent is more complicated. It could be an image
 with an alpha channel (even if completely opaque). It might also be
 anything that LO treat as transparent (maybe borders, some special
 characters, etc... I don't really know). The thing is, if your output is
 correct, it's probably the kind of transparent item that get converted to
 white image over white background... no worries.
 
 However, a bit of warning from personal experience: a few years ago, some
 people (mainly using Acrobat Reader I believe) couldn't open PDF/A-1, while
 these same files would open fine on pretty much anything: gnome document
 viewer, kde viewer (okular), foxit on windows... Pretty funny if you
 consider that PDF/A-1 is supposed to work for long term storage. You should
 double-check that your files open with this certain reader, just to be sure
 :)

Cley,

I appreciate your comments. I don't know much about the various PDF formats
and don't know how I ended up with that format. For some reason I guess at
some time I thought it was the best generally readable format. I notice if I
uncheck that format it jumps to Create PDF Form with 4 format options.
Since I'm not making forms it seems as if that isn't the best option. Tagged
PDF seems to be the only option left. Is that the recommended format? The
help implies that the fonts are only imbedded in PDF/A-1a so does that mean
that someone opening a Tagged Format PDF may have problems if they don't have
the same fonts installed? I thought that wasn't supposed to be the case.

In testing I have just done, the PDF/A-1a came out as 89k, Tagged - 83k and
Create PDF Form using the PDF format ended up as 67k. I normally am looking
for the smallest size so as not to burden people with slow access speeds. All
three are readable in Acrobat as well as Preview on my Mac. There's no way I
can know what reader everyone will be using if there are any issues any more.
Any further comments are welcome.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer - Merging PDFs

2014-01-29 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Peter West li...@pbw.id.au on Wed, 29 Jan 2014
23:04:39 +1000

Peter,

Could you explain off list how to do it with Preview? I've looked it over and
there is no obvious way I can see to do it. Thanks.

Cliff

 Another way to manipulate PDFs is with PDFBox.
 https://pdfbox.apache.org/index.html
 
 If you're on a Mac, you can just use Preview.
 
 However, these things are not designed to modify the layout of pages. 
 PDF is a page definition format; it defines the layout of pages. There 
 are only very limited changes you can make.
 
 Changing layouts means going back to sources and re-creating the PDFs.
 On 29/01/2014 2:32 pm, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
  On 01/28/2014 09:50 PM, Don Myers wrote:
  Hi Charles,
 
  I'm not aware of any way to merge multiple pdf files using LO.
 
  The only way I know to merge pdf files with with pdftk.
  http://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/
  Works great.
 
  tony
 
  There are
  others on the list more knowledgeable than I, so maybe it can be done.
  There is a free, open source program that I've used to merge multiple
  PDF files into one file called PDFsam. It is available for Linux,
  Windows, and Mac. In Ubuntu there is an older version in the software
  center. That is what I've used. It has always worked well.
 
  Don
 
 
 
  On 01/28/2014 08:41 PM, charles meyer wrote:
  I've got 3 or so separate PDF files.
 
  I'd like to merge them all into one PDF file in Writer in Office 3.6.2.2
 
  Each page of each PDF file has a lot of empty space around the graphic
  image.
 
  Ex. 2 inches above and below the graphic on each page and a good 3
  inches on each side of each graphic is white, empty space.
 
  Is there a way to eliminate all the empty space around each graphic in
  in each page in each PDF or once all the PDFs are merged into one
  larger PDF?
 
  Thanks so much,
 
  Charles.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer - Merging PDFs

2014-01-29 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Peter West li...@pbw.id.au on Thu, 30 Jan 2014
11:53:32 +1000

Thanks Peter. It works as you described. The quirk to watch out for is to
drag the page to be inserted after the existing page and NOT below the cutoff
line on the thumbnail list. If you put it below the line then when you save,
what is below the line is not saved.  If above the line then it is all as
advertised. I selected all the pages I wanted to copy at once since they were
going to be at the end of the initial document. Worked slick.

Cliff

 It's a bit fiddly.  You need to experiment a bit, because there are 
 certain quirks in the process, and I don't remember them all off the top 
 of my head. For example, you may find that you can only insert a page in 
 front of an existing page, in which case, you will have to work from the 
 last document, backwards. I'll assume here that you can insert after an 
 existing page.
 
 Copy the first document you want to merge, and open it in Preview.  Open 
 the thumbnails sidebar. Now open the next document, and open its 
 thumbnails panel.  The safest but slowest way to do this is to select 
 one page at a time from the thumbnails of the second document, and drag 
 that thumbnail into the thumbnail panel of the first document. Save your 
 resulting document.
 
 You have to be careful with the positioning of the inserted page, 
 because you can end up with multiple documents within the target pdf. 
 You might be Ok with that. This outcome seems to be more likely when you 
 select multiple pages from the source document.  Try it out.  Make sure 
 that, as you complete the merge of one document, you make a separate 
 copy of the merged result, so that if things subsequently go wrong, you 
 don't have to start from the beginning.
 
 Let me know how you go.
 On 30/01/2014 2:28 am, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Peter West li...@pbw.id.au on Wed, 29 Jan 2014
  23:04:39 +1000
 
  Peter,
 
  Could you explain off list how to do it with Preview? I've looked it over 
  and
  there is no obvious way I can see to do it. Thanks.
 
  Cliff
 
  Another way to manipulate PDFs is with PDFBox.
  https://pdfbox.apache.org/index.html
 
  If you're on a Mac, you can just use Preview.
 
 -- 
 Peter West
 Other seed fell among thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked it...

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Fit Text to Contour

2014-01-24 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com on Fri, 24 Jan 2014
13:32:17 +

Tom,

This is not about wrapping, but making text fit a contour that I define.

Cliff

 Hi :)
 Do you have the text-box in the background?  Then the image
 overlapping the text-box.  Set the wrap options for the image to make
 the text flow around it?  Perhaps optimal page wrap or something?
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 
 
 
 On 24 January 2014 03:39, Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com wrote:
  I'm trying to use Draw to make up some text to put around pictures in 
  Writer.
 
  The help says:
  Adjust to contour - Adapts the text flow so that it matches the 
  contours of
  the selected drawing
  object.
 
  For the life of me I can't figure how to connect the text to a shape. I have
  a text box with text in it and a curve that I drew, but to get the text to
  follow that curve seems beyond me. I've selected the shape and gone to the
  menu Format/Text and selected adjust to contour as it says to do, but 
  nothing
  happens.
 
  Then I selected both at the same time and still nothing. When I double click
  the line and start typing the text writes on a horizontal line and covers 
  the
  line where it intersects it.
 
  This also in Help: To enter text on a line, double-click the line and type 
  or
  paste your text. The text direction corresponds to the direction you dragged
  to draw the line. To hide the line, select Invisible in the Line Style box 
  on
  the Drawing Object Properties bar.
 
  Can't make that work either.
 
  It seems as it I am blind or some key is missing in the help. Any help will
  be greatly appreciated.
 
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: Query

2014-01-21 Thread Cliff Scott
** Forwarding message from Ernest Dale ernest.dal...@gmail.com on Tue, 21 Jan 
2014 13:28:22 +

Thanks to everyone who has taken interest in my problem  Having now got
Approach to work I am sticking with it.
My new problem is how to deal with the influx of help from well-wishers!
Ernest


On 21 January 2014 04:24, Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com wrote:

 ** Reply to message from Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com on Mon,
 20
 Jan 2014 09:19:13 +0100

  Le 19/01/2014 16:02, Tom Davies a écrit :
 
  Tom,
 
   Can Base directly connect to a Lotus Approach database and use it as
   the back-end?
 
  No. Never has and probably never will.
 
  
   @Ernest, Have you still got access to the old Windows and thus the
   Lotus Approach directly or was this an upgrade (or a machine exchange
   or some sort)?  I take it you exported the data as a .csv file and
   that is what is looking like a flat spreadsheet?
 
  Lotus Approach saves its databases as an APR file extension, but the
  actual data is stored as a group of DBF tables. Any binary (e.g. image)
  data or extended character data (Memo fields, etc) are stored in a
  separate DBT file which is referenced in some way by the APR file and
  thus appears in the DBF file that contains the binary field.
 
 
  It was/is for its time a brilliant piece of kit that held its own with
  Access and FMPro. It had an accessible UI and form builder, had a fairly
  competent SQL parser, and could even be scripted with Lotus Smartscript.
  In fact, from the user perspective, it was intuitive, everything which
  LO Base is not. I fully understand why people have stuck with it.
  However, it was essentially, single OS (well it did run on OS/2 as well
  for a while in Windows compatibility mode), as the software was provided
  for the Windows platform only.

 Alex,

 Slight correction, Approach was written for OS/2 Warp4 as well as Windoz. I
 am using ver 1.6 on eCS running in VBox on my Mac. As you say it is very
 intuitive and easy to make queries. I would change over to Base if it was
 straight forward, but there's no way Base would be anywhere near as easy to
 use so I'm sticking to eCS.

 Cliff

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: Query

2014-01-21 Thread Cliff Scott
** Forwarding message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Mon, 20 Jan 
2014 22:24:49 -0600
This was sent to me and should have been sent to the list.

** Reply to message from Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com on Mon, 20
Jan 2014 09:19:13 +0100

 Le 19/01/2014 16:02, Tom Davies a écrit :
 
 Tom,
 
  Can Base directly connect to a Lotus Approach database and use it as
  the back-end?
 
 No. Never has and probably never will.
 
  
  @Ernest, Have you still got access to the old Windows and thus the
  Lotus Approach directly or was this an upgrade (or a machine exchange
  or some sort)?  I take it you exported the data as a .csv file and
  that is what is looking like a flat spreadsheet?
 
 Lotus Approach saves its databases as an APR file extension, but the
 actual data is stored as a group of DBF tables. Any binary (e.g. image)
 data or extended character data (Memo fields, etc) are stored in a
 separate DBT file which is referenced in some way by the APR file and
 thus appears in the DBF file that contains the binary field.
 
 
 It was/is for its time a brilliant piece of kit that held its own with
 Access and FMPro. It had an accessible UI and form builder, had a fairly
 competent SQL parser, and could even be scripted with Lotus Smartscript.
 In fact, from the user perspective, it was intuitive, everything which
 LO Base is not. I fully understand why people have stuck with it.
 However, it was essentially, single OS (well it did run on OS/2 as well
 for a while in Windows compatibility mode), as the software was provided
 for the Windows platform only.

Alex,

Slight correction, Approach was written for OS/2 Warp4 as well as Windoz. I
am using ver 1.6 on eCS running in VBox on my Mac. As you say it is very
intuitive and easy to make queries. I would change over to Base if it was
straight forward, but there's no way Base would be anywhere near as easy to
use so I'm sticking to eCS.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Query

2014-01-20 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com on Mon, 20
Jan 2014 09:19:13 +0100

 Le 19/01/2014 16:02, Tom Davies a écrit :
 
 Tom,
 
  Can Base directly connect to a Lotus Approach database and use it as
  the back-end?
 
 No. Never has and probably never will.
 
  
  @Ernest, Have you still got access to the old Windows and thus the
  Lotus Approach directly or was this an upgrade (or a machine exchange
  or some sort)?  I take it you exported the data as a .csv file and
  that is what is looking like a flat spreadsheet?
 
 Lotus Approach saves its databases as an APR file extension, but the
 actual data is stored as a group of DBF tables. Any binary (e.g. image)
 data or extended character data (Memo fields, etc) are stored in a
 separate DBT file which is referenced in some way by the APR file and
 thus appears in the DBF file that contains the binary field.
 
 
 It was/is for its time a brilliant piece of kit that held its own with
 Access and FMPro. It had an accessible UI and form builder, had a fairly
 competent SQL parser, and could even be scripted with Lotus Smartscript.
 In fact, from the user perspective, it was intuitive, everything which
 LO Base is not. I fully understand why people have stuck with it.
 However, it was essentially, single OS (well it did run on OS/2 as well
 for a while in Windows compatibility mode), as the software was provided
 for the Windows platform only.

Alex,

Slight correction, Approach was written for OS/2 Warp4 as well as Windoz. I
am using ver 1.6 on eCS running in VBox on my Mac. As you say it is very
intuitive and easy to make queries. I would change over to Base if it was
straight forward, but there's no way Base would be anywhere near as easy to
use so I'm sticking to eCS.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Table of Contents - Crash

2013-12-30 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com on Mon, 30 Dec
2013 04:30:08 -0800 (PST)

 I am using an iMac 10.9.1. and LO 4.1.2. and whenever I enter Insert 
 Indexes and Tables Indexes and Tables, LO crashes and I have to recover.
 I tried re-Boot, re-Download LO to no avail.
 Downloaded LO 4.2.1 and it works.
 Can someone confirm a bug in LO4.1.2
 
 Tink

In LO 4.1.4 on a MacBook Pro 10.9.1 the same combination brings up the
expected dialog box.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Mail Merge and Labels

2013-12-19 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com on Wed, 18
Dec 2013 17:10:24 +

 At 07:46 18/12/2013 -0600, Cliff Scott wrote:
 Initially I just want a sheet with all the labels the same. [...] 
 For now I can obviously copy/paste to each label, but the wizard's 
 way of entering data for one then propagating it to all is handy for 
 like a set of return address labels.
 
 If you are using a table, have you tried my suggestion in a related thread?
 
 o Put the cursor in the cell containing the text.
 o Press Ctrl+A to select all the text in that cell.
 o Press Ctrl+C to copy that text.
 o Press Ctrl+A again to select the entire table.
 o Press Ctrl+V to paste copies of the text into all the cells at once.
 
 I trust this helps.

Thanks Brian. Saw that after I sent my email. Should work fine.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Mail Merge and Labels

2013-12-18 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com on Tue, 17
Dec 2013 10:53:17 -0500

Don,

Initially I just want a sheet with all the labels the same. Being able to
fill a sheet with addresses from a database or even directly print envelopes
may be in the future.

For now I can obviously copy/paste to each label, but the wizard's way of
entering data for one then propagating it to all is handy for like a set of
return address labels.

Cliff

 Hi Cliff,
 
 Are you using fields from a data base, or do you simply want something 
 like return labels where every label is the same?
 
 Don
 
 On 12/17/2013 10:06 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com on Mon, 16
  Dec 2013 20:48:12 -0500
 
  Don,
 
  Thanks for the link to the templates, but, pardon my ignorance, what is the
  proper way to setup a table based template?
 
  The wizard is useful, but, as already discussed, the built-in templates 
  often
  don't work well. If the built in ones could be replaced with these table
  based ones and still have the wizard work it would be the best of both 
  worlds.
 
  Cliff
 
  Hi Virgil,
 
  They have really worked well for me. With the frame based templates, I
  always had trouble with the spacing on the labels changing as you would
  get into the bottom third of the label sheet. The frame based templates
  print out perfectly from top to bottom, and they are so easy to adjust.
  I've left similar posts when people have had issues before, but it seems
  very few are willing to try the table based formats. Maybe they try to
  use the wizard, which is not the way to set up a table based template.
 
  Don
 
  On 12/16/2013 08:11 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
  Don,
 
  Thank you for this. I knew I had seen something like that before.
 
  LO uses a frame based label template. I agree that a table based
  template makes far more sense.
 
  Virgil
 
  -Original Message- From: Don C. Myers
  Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 7:34 PM
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Mail Merge and Labels
 
  About 5 or 6 years ago when using OpenOffice to print Christmas labels,
  I ran across an article about using table style labels in OpenOffice
  instead of the type which come with Word, OpenOffice, and LibreOffice.
  It is far easier to adjust the table style labels. To adjust the top
  spacing, simply adjust the top margin for the page. To adjust the column
  width, simply drag the column borders and the entire column is adjusted.
  At one time OpenOffice had these label templates available as an
  extension. I don't know if they still do or not. But they are available
  from World Label here:
  http://www.worldlabel.com/Pages/openoffice-template.htm
  They can be downloaded individually, or all together as a pdf.
 
  I've found them much easier to use and adjust, and have never used any
  other label templates since then. Also, when you enter the text or
  fields in them, the text is starts with being paced in the center of the
  label between the top and the bottom, and then as additional lines are
  added, the text of fields are automatically centered within the label
  itself, top to bottom. I've never used the standard templates with
  OpenOffice or LibreOffice since finding these. Nor have I wasted any
  sheets of labels because they didn't print properly.
 
  Don
  ---Extra trimmed---

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Mail Merge and Labels

2013-12-17 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com on Mon, 16
Dec 2013 20:48:12 -0500

Don,

Thanks for the link to the templates, but, pardon my ignorance, what is the
proper way to setup a table based template? 

The wizard is useful, but, as already discussed, the built-in templates often
don't work well. If the built in ones could be replaced with these table
based ones and still have the wizard work it would be the best of both worlds.

Cliff

 Hi Virgil,
 
 They have really worked well for me. With the frame based templates, I 
 always had trouble with the spacing on the labels changing as you would 
 get into the bottom third of the label sheet. The frame based templates 
 print out perfectly from top to bottom, and they are so easy to adjust. 
 I've left similar posts when people have had issues before, but it seems 
 very few are willing to try the table based formats. Maybe they try to 
 use the wizard, which is not the way to set up a table based template.
 
 Don
 
 On 12/16/2013 08:11 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
  Don,
 
  Thank you for this. I knew I had seen something like that before.
 
  LO uses a frame based label template. I agree that a table based 
  template makes far more sense.
 
  Virgil
 
  -Original Message- From: Don C. Myers
  Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 7:34 PM
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Mail Merge and Labels
 
  About 5 or 6 years ago when using OpenOffice to print Christmas labels,
  I ran across an article about using table style labels in OpenOffice
  instead of the type which come with Word, OpenOffice, and LibreOffice.
  It is far easier to adjust the table style labels. To adjust the top
  spacing, simply adjust the top margin for the page. To adjust the column
  width, simply drag the column borders and the entire column is adjusted.
  At one time OpenOffice had these label templates available as an
  extension. I don't know if they still do or not. But they are available
  from World Label here:
  http://www.worldlabel.com/Pages/openoffice-template.htm
  They can be downloaded individually, or all together as a pdf.
 
  I've found them much easier to use and adjust, and have never used any
  other label templates since then. Also, when you enter the text or
  fields in them, the text is starts with being paced in the center of the
  label between the top and the bottom, and then as additional lines are
  added, the text of fields are automatically centered within the label
  itself, top to bottom. I've never used the standard templates with
  OpenOffice or LibreOffice since finding these. Nor have I wasted any
  sheets of labels because they didn't print properly.
 
  Don

---Extra trimmed---

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Question

2013-11-30 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from A publicf...@bak.rr.com on Fri, 29 Nov 2013
20:45:54 -0800

Now I see how the existing FV would do what I needed to do. What threw me was
that it says to enter a payment value which there is none except the interest
accrued. Reading the info on the Wiki page explains that one can use 0 as the
payment then get the value including the compound interest. It would be very
helpful if the Help file included that key bit of information. I was
surprised that LO didn't have what would be a common financial function, but
in fact it did, I just didn't recognize it.

Cliff

 Now that Dave was kind enough to translate the problem into common 
 financial terms I recognize, finding the FV function is easy.
 
 Menu-Insert-Function-Select Financial-FV
 OR, use the function wizard to accomplish the same.
 
 I've always hated word problems, I could never translate words into math 
 equations.  But the OP asked about calculating compound interest which 
 is not the same as future value.  Calculating FV is definitely an 
 important first step.
 
 This link: 
 http://www.ehow.com/how_2166243_calculate-compound-interest.html shows 
 the same formula Dave provided (albeit Dave's formula was much more 
 helpful), but they go the extra step of showing that the compound 
 interest is actually the Future Value minus the Present Value.
 
 I had to scratch my head over this a few times and re-read the link 
 quite a few times before I finally saw the answer sitting there in front 
 of me.  They calculate the interest on $1000 in the example link - show 
 that FV = 1210, and finally show that the interest ends up being the FV 
 of $1210 minus the original PV of $1000: so interest earned is $210.
 
 I would never have recognized the formula in the link as being FV, and 
 so without Dave's help I couldn't have figured any of this out.
 
 
 On 11/27/2013 04:12 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
  I've had troubles in the past finding specific financial functions, as 
  well.  Can't help from the function standpoint in this case, but you 
  could always fall back on the actual equation:
 
  FV = PV*(1+i)^n
 
  where FV is future value, PV is present value, i is the periodic 
  interest rate, and n is the number of periods.
 
  Dave
 
 
 
  On 11/27/2013 15:10, Cliff Scott wrote:
  I haven't done much spread sheet formula work so please don't mind a 
  couple
  of simple questions.
 
  I would like to do two things:
 
  1. Calculate compound interest on an amount given the rate and number of
  interest periods. Looking at the list of functions there are lots of 
  ones
  that come close to that, but I wasn't able to find one that would do 
  exact
  that.
 
  2. How do I write a conditional loop in Calc? If I want to calculate a
  formula for 10 iterations how would I do that? For instance
  Value=Value*N+Value. That would give me the compound interest also. I 
  can do
  it with a bunch of cells strung out each one representing one interest
  period, but for any length of time it becomes unwieldy.
 
  Thank you very much for any help.
 
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Question

2013-11-28 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Dave Liesse dslie...@liessefamily.net on Wed, 27
Nov 2013 16:12:16 -0800

Dave,

Thank you for the formula! I figured out how to enter it as a user function
so it's easy to use. Thanks again.

Cliff

 I've had troubles in the past finding specific financial functions, as 
 well.  Can't help from the function standpoint in this case, but you 
 could always fall back on the actual equation:
 
 FV = PV*(1+i)^n
 
 where FV is future value, PV is present value, i is the periodic 
 interest rate, and n is the number of periods.
 
 Dave
 
 
 
 On 11/27/2013 15:10, Cliff Scott wrote:
  I haven't done much spread sheet formula work so please don't mind a couple
  of simple questions.
 
  I would like to do two things:
 
  1. Calculate compound interest on an amount given the rate and number of
  interest periods. Looking at the list of functions there are lots of ones
  that come close to that, but I wasn't able to find one that would do exact
  that.
 
  2. How do I write a conditional loop in Calc? If I want to calculate a
  formula for 10 iterations how would I do that? For instance
  Value=Value*N+Value. That would give me the compound interest also. I can do
  it with a bunch of cells strung out each one representing one interest
  period, but for any length of time it becomes unwieldy.
 
  Thank you very much for any help.
 
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Question

2013-11-27 Thread Cliff Scott
I haven't done much spread sheet formula work so please don't mind a couple
of simple questions.

I would like to do two things:

1. Calculate compound interest on an amount given the rate and number of
interest periods. Looking at the list of functions there are lots of ones
that come close to that, but I wasn't able to find one that would do exact
that.

2. How do I write a conditional loop in Calc? If I want to calculate a
formula for 10 iterations how would I do that? For instance
Value=Value*N+Value. That would give me the compound interest also. I can do
it with a bunch of cells strung out each one representing one interest
period, but for any length of time it becomes unwieldy.

Thank you very much for any help.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug report -- LibreOffice version 4.1.3.2

2013-11-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from A publicf...@bak.rr.com on Mon, 25 Nov 2013
09:55:26 -0800


Great! I just tested this and it does use the date/time last modified. You
don't need to tick anything else, just insert the field. Works it should.
Thanks for tracking this option down. Will be very useful.

Cliff

 I haven't tested this, but a quick perusal led me to:
 
 Insert-Fields-Other-DocInformation TAB-Modified-Select Date/Time... 
 may need to tick Fixed Content checkbox, I don't know.
 
 Which isn't necessarily the date the file is _saved_, but _appears to 
 be_ the date the file was *_last modified_* which I suspect is what the 
 OP really wanted.
 
 
 
 On 11/24/2013 05:31 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com on Sun, 24
  Nov 2013 03:10:49 +
 
  At 20:34 23/11/2013 -0500, Don C. Myers wrote:
  About a year to a year and a half ago the question was asked on this
  list about when a date is filled in automatically, how it can be
  saved as the date that the file is saved, and the file will open
  automatically with the saved date instead of the current date the
  next time it is opened.
  Go to Insert | Fields  | Other... | Document.  Under Type select
  Date and under Select select Date - not Date (fixed).  One point of
  confusion is that at Insert | Fields  you will see a Date entry -
  but this is actually the Date (fixed) variety, not the (variable)
  Date that you need.  So ignore that and proceed to Other... .
 
  I trust this helps.
 
  Brian Barker
  Brian,
 
  This gives a date and or time that updates everytime the file is opened, not
  only when edited which it appears is what the poster was looking for.
 
  Cliff
 

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug report -- Libre Ofice version 4.1.3.2

2013-11-23 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from william drescher will...@techservsys.com on Sat,
23 Nov 2013 08:01:57 -0500

 On 11/23/2013 12:50 AM, Robert Baker wrote:
 
  1) There is no way (that I have found) to insert the date and time as text;
  the only option is to insert them as a field, meaning that the next time
  the document is opened, the date and time shown would be when it was
  re-opened, rather than when it was last edited which is what I want. I had
  to take the file back into MS Word just to add the date and time, but I
  want to be rid of Word.
 
 
 The simple way of adding a date: Insert-fields-date will add a 
 date that does not change.  You have to go through a few more 
 steps to get a date that is current when the file is opened.
 So, no problem with this one.
 
 I will leave the other questions to those that are more expert.
 
 bill

Just to clarify this a little more, in Writer the default seems to be to
insert a fixed date and or time. If you RMB on the field and select field
from the popup menu that will give you all the options for format and whether
it is a fixed value or updates each time it is opened.

Calc is a different story. It seems as if there is no way, at least according
to the Help file, to use a fixed date field in a footer or header. I have to
manually insert the date as text if I don't want it to change. Of course
fixed dates and times can also be manually inserted in cells.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug report -- Libre Ofice version 4.1.3.2

2013-11-23 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com on Sat, 23
Nov 2013 20:34:16 -0500

The question is how to automate it. One could manually delete the date field
and reenter it when editing. That way it would have the current date and not
change, but automation could be a challenge.

Cliff

 Hi Everyone,
 
 About a year to a year and a half ago the question was asked on this 
 list about when a date is filled in automatically, how it can be saved 
 as the date that the file is saved, and the file will open automatically 
 with the saved date instead of the current date the next time it is 
 opened. The answer was fairly simple. I have minimal need for this and 
 didn't write it down. Maybe the regulars to this list will remember the 
 answer.
 
 Don
 
 
 On 11/23/2013 08:14 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
  I think what the Original Poster was seeking was a semi-fixed date.
 
  A fixed date would simply be the same as if one typed in the date by 
  hand. It would never change. A dynamic date field would change every 
  time the date changed. What I think the OP wants is for the field to 
  reflect the date on which the file was last edited and saved. So, 
  oversimplifying the question, there would be three possible dates -- 
  the original date the file was created, the last time the file was 
  edited and saved, and the current date (whenever that may be). It 
  appears from a quick glance at LO's field dialogs that one can get the 
  first and third options, but not the second. But, I'm not an expert on 
  date fields.
 
  While I agree this might be helpful, I would not characterize it as a 
  bug. Perhaps a feature request (if in fact LO can't do what the OP 
  wants)
 
  Virgil
 
  -Original Message- From: Cliff Scott
  Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 3:11 PM
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug report -- Libre Ofice version 
  4.1.3.2
 
  ** Reply to message from william drescher will...@techservsys.com on 
  Sat,
  23 Nov 2013 08:01:57 -0500
 
  On 11/23/2013 12:50 AM, Robert Baker wrote:
  
   1) There is no way (that I have found) to insert the date and time 
  as  text;
   the only option is to insert them as a field, meaning that the next 
  time
   the document is opened, the date and time shown would be when it was
   re-opened, rather than when it was last edited which is what I 
  want. I  had
   to take the file back into MS Word just to add the date and time, 
  but I
   want to be rid of Word.
  
 
  The simple way of adding a date: Insert-fields-date will add a
  date that does not change.  You have to go through a few more
  steps to get a date that is current when the file is opened.
  So, no problem with this one.
 
  I will leave the other questions to those that are more expert.
 
  bill
 
  Just to clarify this a little more, in Writer the default seems to be to
  insert a fixed date and or time. If you RMB on the field and select field
  from the popup menu that will give you all the options for format and 
  whether
  it is a fixed value or updates each time it is opened.
 
  Calc is a different story. It seems as if there is no way, at least 
  according
  to the Help file, to use a fixed date field in a footer or header. I 
  have to
  manually insert the date as text if I don't want it to change. Of course
  fixed dates and times can also be manually inserted in cells.
 
  Cliff
 

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Would somebody be able to help a newbe to LibreOffice.

2013-11-08 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from John Meyer johnme...@pueblocomputing.com on Thu,
07 Nov 2013 18:29:14 -0700

To be more specific:

If you only want to keep the column labels visible, put the cursor in the far
left column (before column A) on row 2 then go to the Window menu item and
select freeze. All column headers in row 1 will stay visible as you scroll
everything below them. If you don't go to the far left column it will still
work, but make a darker line to the left of the column that you selected. I
don't know any way to keep just one or several columns frozen and scroll the
others.

HTH,
Cliff

 _W_indow-_F_reeze
 
 Place cursor underneath row you want to stay still.
 
 HTH
 
 On 11/7/2013 6:21 PM, Bill Gassner wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  Thanks for responding to my call for help. Here is the situation: I
  have a LibreOffice Cal sheet with rows 1-34 with text. Rows 35-40 with
  titles above 7 colums.
  Rows 41-100 is entries.
 
  I would like to modify document so that rows 35-40 stay fixed when I
  scroll down to say column  100.
 
  This way the titles of the seven columns would always be visible. I
  know this can be done.
 
  What formula would I use and where would I put that?
 
  Many thanks in advance
 
  Bill

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-05 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
23:00:26 -0800

 On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
  2013 15:29:02 -0500
  
  Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
  
  Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
  removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
  will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
  as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
  but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
  newsletter I publish.
  
  Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
  I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with 
  this
  issue.
 ...
 
 Sorry, can't help you with a Mac, but...
 
 I copied the Calibri fonts from my Win7 partition and placed in my
 ~/.fonts folder on linux. Updated the font cache (sudo fc-cache -f -v),
 opened LO 4.1.3.2 (Version: 4.1.2.3 Build ID:
 40b2d7fde7e8d2d7bc5a449dc65df4d08a7dd38), and both Calibri and Calibri
 Light show up in the font menu  work just fine. Note: When you use a
 Calibri (or any other font set) you can see the options available via
 'Format|Character'. I'm showing the following:
 
 Calibri - Regular|Bold|Italic|Bold italic
 Calibri Light - Light|Light Italic|Bold|Bold Italic
 
 I'll now purge the font(s) due to licencing issues. :-)
 I find that FreeSans 11 is a very close match to Calibri 12. You might
 want to give that a try. http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/

NoOp - thanks for your ideas. They gave me a clue how to work around the
issue. It's not the ideal way and the results are not exactly what I wanted,
but may be useable.

Going into Format/Character I find that the Light option is listed under
Calibri, but unfortunately Light Bold isn't listed so when I bold the Light
font it ends up as the Regular Calibri Bold and not Light Bold that it should
be. Apparently LO 4.1.3.2 tries to combine the two fonts into one family
rather than keep them separate. The Mac Font Book also lists them as one
family where in fact they are two families with a common base name. Somehow
LO 4.0.5 keeps them separate, but 4.1.3.2 doesn't. As I said earlier Open
Office also sees them as separate families. At least now I have a better
handle on what's happening. Thanks.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
on Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:07:45 -0500

Thanks for the reply.

 Would you tell us if it is a 
 .ttf, .otf, or some other font extension type.

It is .ttf
 
 I do not have Calibri Light, just normal, italic, bold, and
 bold-italic.  All of them are .ttf

Initally all I had in that family was the same ones as you had then found the
Light version which actually is Light and Light Italic.
 
 There was a similar font listing bug last year or early this year.  I do
 not remember which version it was that had the missing font in that Mac
 system.
 
 Is there any reason why could cannot use 4.0.5 or 4.0.6, till the font
 issues are worked out?

I can continue using 4.0.5 just fine, just wanted to upgrade and found the
problem.

 
 I had a problem with the font scroll-down dialog box for the fonts in
 4.1.2 [Ubuntu 64-bit], which was a show-stopper for me, but I am
 perfectly happy to still use 4.0.5 or 4.0.6 till they get the bug fixes
 done.
 
 
 Just to through this out,
 
 can you copy the font in the internal font folder for LO?  I know that
 there is a folder in Ubuntu/Debian for LO fonts
 
 /etc/libreoffice4.0/share/fonts/truetype/
 
 There are 69 fonts and a file called fc_local.conf in that folder.
 
 So I wonder if your Mac has a similar root folder for LibreOffice,
 there might be a place there to copy that font to so it is within LO's
 internal list of fonts and not looking for the font folder that
 shares fonts with all of the installed packages.

Same thing on the Mac. Same files in that folder also. I tried adding the
font files to that directory with no joy. Probably needs some process to
install so it can see them.

Guess I'll have to file a bug as it makes no sense to have the font appear in
one version and not in the other.

Cliff
 
 
 
 On 11/04/2013 03:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
  2013 15:29:02 -0500
 
  Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
 
  Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
  removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
  will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
  as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
  but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
  newsletter I publish.
 
  Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
  I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with 
  this
  issue.
 
  Thanks for any ideas or suggestions.
 
  Cliff 
 
  Hi Y'all,
 
  I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. 
  Opened a
  document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
  one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
  all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
  appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 
  on
  a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
  normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
  Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
  would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would 
  be
  corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 
 
  Thanks.
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Marc Grober m...@interak.com on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
12:06:32 -0900

Hi Marc,

Thanks for the reply.

 I guess I should first ask if you open a doc that has text formatted as
 Calibri Light,  what font is it being shown as under 4.1.2.3, what is
 the provenance of the Calibri Light,   have you confirmed that the font
 is available for all uses and all users, and whether it is not only
 activated but enabled (two different things).

Have tried a document formatted with Calibri Light and just a blank new doc.
Calibri Light does not show up in the dropdown font list at the top of the
page in LO 4.1.3.2. In the document itself the text formatted with Calibri
Light shows Calibri Light in italics at the top of the LO window indicating
that LO doesn't find the font and is substituting another font. Same doc in
LO 4.0.5 shows Calibri Light in the dropdown list as well as correctly using
the font in the document.

I am the only user on the machine. I have checked that it is available,
enabled and verified using the OSx Font Book app. that comes with OSx. I went
so far as to remove the whole Calibri Font family from the system, rebooted
and verified it was gone then reinstalled the Calibri Family again. The
symptoms after that were  identical to before.

Seems to me that if one version sees the font that it is available to the
system and the issue has to be with LO 4.1.3.2.

 
 Then I might suggest logging out of your account on the subject machine,
 logging in with a new account, creating a new document, checking the
 default font, and then typing some text and try to format it as calibri
 Light. This should resolve all questions as to whether the issue has
 something to do with your pre-existing preferences, non-availability as
 a system, font, etc.
 
 If no joy, download Scrivener, install and test and see if Calibri Light
 shows up and is usable. If not,  then there is an issue with your font, 
 if it does then you may be looking at a bug

Opened OpenOffice and it sees the font just fine. Actually it sees better
that LO 4.0.5 in that it shows Calibri Light and Calibri Light Italic in the
font list. LO 4.0.5 only shows Calibri Light.

Time for a bug report it seems to me.

Cliff

 
 
 On 11/4/13, 11:38 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
  2013 15:29:02 -0500
 
  Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
 
  Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
  removed the whole family of fonts and reinstalled them and still LO 4.1..3.2
  will not recognize Calibri Light. This is mind boggling to me since, as far
  as I can see, it sees all the other installed fonts. This may sound strange,
  but without this font I cannot use this version. This is a key font in a
  newsletter I publish.
 
  Please, if anyone has any ideas what can be done to make this work speak up.
  I would very much like to upgrade to the 4.1.3.2 version, but can't with 
  this
  issue.
 
  Thanks for any ideas or suggestions.
 
  Cliff 
 
  Hi Y'all,
 
  I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. 
  Opened a
  document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
  one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
  all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
  appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 
  on
  a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
  normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
  Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
  would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would 
  be
  corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 
 
  Thanks.
  Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] LO 4.1.3.2

2013-11-02 Thread Cliff Scott
Hi Y'all,

I have been using LO 4.0.5 for some time and just installed 4.1.3.2. Opened a
document that I had been doing in 4.0.5 and found that 4.1.3.2 doesn't see
one of my fonts, Calibri Light. It doesn't appear in the list of fonts at
all. Only the base Calibri appears. In 4.0.5 both the base and the Light
appear as separate fonts in the font dropdown list. I'm running OSx 10.7.5 on
a MacBook Pro. Checked via the Font Book app and Calibri Light appears
normally. Validated the font and no problems were found. Interestingly
Calibri Light was the last font I have installed. Even reinstalled it. I
would normally reboot to make sure something wasn't just funny that would be
corrected by rebooting, but can't do that right now. Ideas anyone? 

Thanks.
Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Duplicate messages

2013-10-03 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com on Thu, 03 Oct
2013 08:09:19 -0400

I've been seeing duplicates for a couple of days now.

 Virgil Arrington wrote:
  So, you should get two copies of this email. However, I've never had
  to wait 2-3 days for the second copy. It usually comes within minutes
  of the first message.
 
 This morning I received some from Sept 30 and Oct. 1, including one from
 me, which I had already seen.  When I first noticed this, I checked my
 trash folder and saw there were indeed duplicates.
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Uninstall ?

2013-07-29 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Sheafe Ewing sheafe.ew...@gmail.com on Sat, 27 Jul
2013 13:08:15 -0700

 Have read the ReadMe Notes after downloading LibreOffice 4.1.0
 
 Is it necessary to uninstall  version 4.0.3.3 before installing the newest 
 version 4.1.0
 
 Using Mac OS 10.8.4
 
 Thx

Just install and it will ask you if you want to overwrite the old one or keep
two copies. I usually keep both for a while in case there are problems with
the new one. Each one runs independently of the other.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Importing image from LO Draw (ODG) to Writer

2013-07-21 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Sun, 21 Jul
2013 11:21:58 +0100 (BST)

Hi Tom,

I appreciate your thoughts. I'm sure I don't understand all the integration
of the modules. I don't have an internet connection right now so can't look
at the suggested resource, but will when I can.

Using the LO help file and trying all the menu options I can find I don't see
any way to put page breaks in a draw image. I can select different parts of
the image, but I see nothing regarding page breaks and the cursor will not
stop anywhere alongside the image to allow one to select a page break even if
there was an menu item for it as there is in Writer. Could you explain in
more detail how I would go about doing this? The best I could get from the
Help was to do it as I did with selecting portions and copy/paste into Writer.

Cliff

 Hi :)
 You are not yet thinking in the LO way.  The modules/apps (such as Writer,
 Calc, Draw) are not separate programs in the way you seem to be trying to use
 them.  This is very different from MS Office.  With MSO if you open 2 of the
 apps then you pretty much double the amount of space taken up in Ram and
 double the resources used.  
 
 Why not just create the page-breaks in Draw?  Even if you do get the Pdf into
 Writer and save as an Odt rather than an Odg it still doesn't become any more
 editable than it is as an Odg.  Pdf is made to be uneditable.  That is part
 of it's aim.  It's because it is uneditable that it appears the same on every
 machine or printer in any OS or program that displays Pdf, or at least that's
 the aim.  
 
 You might find it helpful to skim quickly through the Getting Started Guide
 and see if some things in there catch your eye
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
 Regards from 
 Tom :)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
 Sent: Sunday, 21 July 2013, 3:54
 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Importing image from LO Draw (ODG) to Writer
  
 
 I had a one page PDF file that I wanted to break into multiple pages. Opening
 the PDF with LO resulted in LO Draw opening with the file nicely displayed. I
 saved it as a draw image (odg) and then expected to be able to directly
 import it to Writer. Unfortunately I could find no way to do that. Even using
 copy/paste resulted in a black page since the image was larger than one page.
 My hope was to have it come in and naturally break into multiple pages. As a
 last resort I selected a portion of the image in Draw , copy/pasted it into
 Writer, inserted a page break then repeated the action on multiple pages
 until the entire image was in Writer. It seems as if there must be a more
 elegant way to do this. I have never used Draw before so I'm just trying to
 figure out the details. To be useful it seems as if there must be an easy way
 to move from Draw into Writer or Calc. Can someone help me see what I'm
 missing?  Thanks.
 
 Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Importing image from LO Draw (ODG) to Writer

2013-07-20 Thread Cliff Scott
I had a one page PDF file that I wanted to break into multiple pages. Opening
the PDF with LO resulted in LO Draw opening with the file nicely displayed. I
saved it as a draw image (odg) and then expected to be able to directly
import it to Writer. Unfortunately I could find no way to do that. Even using
copy/paste resulted in a black page since the image was larger than one page.
My hope was to have it come in and naturally break into multiple pages. As a
last resort I selected a portion of the image in Draw , copy/pasted it into
Writer, inserted a page break then repeated the action on multiple pages
until the entire image was in Writer. It seems as if there must be a more
elegant way to do this. I have never used Draw before so I'm just trying to
figure out the details. To be useful it seems as if there must be an easy way
to move from Draw into Writer or Calc. Can someone help me see what I'm
missing?  Thanks.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Printing with HP 960C Deskjet

2013-07-16 Thread Cliff Scott
Fellow LibreOffice users - 

I am running LO on a Mac, OSx 10.7.5 and the printer is a HP 960C Deskjet.
There are no native OSx drivers for the 960C so I've loaded drivers from
Guten Print, Hpijs and also an HP 9800. All three work fine with every OSx
app including OpenOffice 3.4.1. In LO the print dialog does not use the
normal OSx dialog that every other app uses, but has its own. That dialog
does not allow me to select Dual sided printing or Print Quality other than
Draft, among other missing, but not so important settings. Is there any way
around this? Why does LO do its own thing and not use the normal dialogs? I
have to have OpenOffice installed just to print properly. Very wasteful of
time and resources. 

LO has fixed a number of things that are not fixed in OO so I'd much rather
use LO all the way, except for this one issue. 

Thanks for any help.

Cliff

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.5 Crashed (Resolved)

2012-04-16 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com on Mon, 16
Apr 2012 13:32:54 -0400

Glad the easy fix worked.

 *Dear Cliff Scott and Tom Davis,
 
 Thank you very much for your replies.
 
 As I could not get LibreOffice 3.5 back at all, I was unable to  go to my
 User Profile via LibreOffice -- Tools-- Options -- LibreOffice --
 Paths.
 
 But I was able to go via C:\Users\user
 name\AppData\Roaming\LibreOffice\3\user.
 
 I changed user to user.OLD.
 
 I launched LibreOffice 3.5 again, and I got it back.
 
 Thank you very much for your help.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Taang Zomi*
 
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Cliff Scott ae...@qsl.net
 Date: Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.5 Crashed
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org
 
 
 ** Reply to message from Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com on Sun, 15
 Apr 2012 20:43:47 -0400
 
 You may need to reinstall, but first you could try renaming your profile.
 I'm
 sorry, but I don't know where in Win7 it is kept, but it's around somewhere.
 LO will generate a new one on startup. If that works then you can begin
 moving sections of the old profile into the new one until you find which one
 was corrupt/damaged.
 
 Cliff
 
  *Should I uninstall and reinstall LibreOfiice 3.5?*
 
 
  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com
  Date: Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:37 PM
  Subject: LibreOffice 3.5 Crashed
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Cc: Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com
 
 
  *
  Today, when I launched LibreOffice 3.5, I found out that it was crashed. I
  clicked 'Start Recovery'.
 
  I got a message that says Successfully recovered'. I clicked 'Finish'.
 
  I got a message that says Due to an unexpected error, LibreOffice
 crashed.
  All tye files you were workimg on now will be saved. The next time
  LibreOffice is launched, your files will be covered automatically.
 
  I clicked 'OK'.
 
  The LibreOffice 3.5 completely disappeared.
 
  I cannot use LibreOffice 3.5. I launched it again, but the same thing
  happened.
 
  Computer: MSi A6000;  CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T6600 @ 2.20 GHz; OS:
  Windows 7,  RAM:: 4.0 GB, HD: 320 GH
 
  What do I need to do to get back my LibreOffice 3.5?
 
  ==
  15 APR 2012 SUN
  7:59 PM
 
  =
  #1
  =
  LibreOffice 3.5
 
  Press 'Start Recovery' to start the recovery process of the documents
  listed below.
 
  The 'Status' column shows whether the document could be recovered.
 
  Recovering Document
  
  |  |
 
  Status of rececovered dcuments:
 
 
  
  |Document Name|Status  |
  
  |[] Syllable Rules.odt  Not reccovered yet |
  |  |
  |  |
  ---
 |   |
 |  Start Recovery   | |Cancel|
 |---|
  =
  #2:
  =
  LibreOffice 3.5
 
  ---
  Recovery of your documents was finished.
  Click 'Finish' to see your documents.
 
 
  Recovering  document:
  ---
  |
 
  Status of recovered documents:
  ---
  | document Name  |Status  |
  --
  |Syllable Rules.odt Successfully recovered|
  | |
  | |
 
 
  --
 
   ||
   | Finish |   |Cancel|
   |    |
 
  =
  #3:
  =
  LibreOFfice 3.5
 
  ---
  Due to an unexpected error, LibreOffice crashed. All the files you were
  workimg on now will be saved. The next time LibreOffice is launched, your
  files will be covered automatically.
 
  The following files will be recovered:
  ---
  |Syllable Rules.odt   |
  | |
  | |
  | |
 
  --
 |--|
 | OK

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.5 Crashed

2012-04-15 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com on Sun, 15
Apr 2012 20:43:47 -0400

You may need to reinstall, but first you could try renaming your profile. I'm
sorry, but I don't know where in Win7 it is kept, but it's around somewhere.
LO will generate a new one on startup. If that works then you can begin
moving sections of the old profile into the new one until you find which one
was corrupt/damaged.

Cliff

 *Should I uninstall and reinstall LibreOfiice 3.5?*
 
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:37 PM
 Subject: LibreOffice 3.5 Crashed
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org
 Cc: Taang Zomi libreofficez...@gmail.com
 
 
 *
 Today, when I launched LibreOffice 3.5, I found out that it was crashed. I
 clicked 'Start Recovery'.
 
 I got a message that says Successfully recovered'. I clicked 'Finish'.
 
 I got a message that says Due to an unexpected error, LibreOffice crashed.
 All tye files you were workimg on now will be saved. The next time
 LibreOffice is launched, your files will be covered automatically.
 
 I clicked 'OK'.
 
 The LibreOffice 3.5 completely disappeared.
 
 I cannot use LibreOffice 3.5. I launched it again, but the same thing
 happened.
 
 Computer: MSi A6000;  CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T6600 @ 2.20 GHz; OS:
 Windows 7,  RAM:: 4.0 GB, HD: 320 GH
 
 What do I need to do to get back my LibreOffice 3.5?
 
 ==
 15 APR 2012 SUN
 7:59 PM
 
 =
 #1
 =
 LibreOffice 3.5
 
 Press 'Start Recovery' to start the recovery process of the documents
 listed below.
 
 The 'Status' column shows whether the document could be recovered.
 
 Recovering Document
 
 |  |
 
 Status of rececovered dcuments:
 
 
 
 |Document Name|Status  |
 
 |[] Syllable Rules.odt  Not reccovered yet |
 |  |
 |  |
 ---
|   |
|  Start Recovery   | |Cancel|
|---|
 =
 #2:
 =
 LibreOffice 3.5
 
 ---
 Recovery of your documents was finished.
 Click 'Finish' to see your documents.
 
 
 Recovering  document:
 ---
 |
 
 Status of recovered documents:
 ---
 | document Name  |Status  |
 --
 |Syllable Rules.odt Successfully recovered|
 | |
 | |
 
 
 --
 
  ||
  | Finish |   |Cancel|
  |    |
 
 =
 #3:
 =
 LibreOFfice 3.5
 
 ---
 Due to an unexpected error, LibreOffice crashed. All the files you were
 workimg on now will be saved. The next time LibreOffice is launched, your
 files will be covered automatically.
 
 The following files will be recovered:
 ---
 |Syllable Rules.odt   |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 
 --
|--|
| OK   |
|--|
 *
 
 -- 
 For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] two dots above the i in presentation.

2012-03-13 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com on Tue, 13 Mar
2012 08:18:20 -0400

 Brian Barker wrote:
  At 00:56 13/03/2012 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote:
  The absolutely correct spelling of the word naïve has the two dots, 
  known in English as a dieresis, or in German as an Umlaut, indicating 
  a change in sound, rather than a diphthong.
 
  For what it's worth, the German for diaeresis appears to be Trema. 
  The umlaut looks the same, but it's a different mark: it is an accent, 
  whereas the diaeresis is (as you describe) also a diacritic but not an 
  accent.
 
  Brian Barker
 
 
 For those who are interested, it's possible to generate the various 
 special characters by using the U.S. International keyboard. With it, 
 you can use the right Alt key to create those characters, such as ü, á, 
 , £, € etc. The left Alt key works as usual.

Pardon my ignorance, but could you describe how that works or where one would
find out that information? Thanks.

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] two dots above the i in presentation.

2012-03-13 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Mark Stanton m...@vowleyfarm.co.uk on Tue, 13 Mar
2012 16:39:33 -

  Pardon my ignorance, but could you describe how that works or where one 
  would
  find out that information? Thanks.
 
 You hold down the ALt key and, using the numeric keypad only (I think, but 
 might be wrong), you key in the ASCII code for the letter you want.

I seem to recall something like that from long ago. Thanks!

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: two dots above the i in presentation.

2012-03-13 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Werner F. Bruhin werner.bru...@free.fr on Tue,
13 Mar 2012 15:26:02 +0100

 On 13/03/2012 13:47, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from James Knottjames.kn...@rogers.com  on Tue, 13 Mar
  2012 08:18:20 -0400
 
  Brian Barker wrote:
  At 00:56 13/03/2012 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote:
  The absolutely correct spelling of the word naïve has the two dots,
  known in English as a dieresis, or in German as an Umlaut, indicating
  a change in sound, rather than a diphthong.
 
  For what it's worth, the German for diaeresis appears to be Trema.
  The umlaut looks the same, but it's a different mark: it is an accent,
  whereas the diaeresis is (as you describe) also a diacritic but not an
  accent.
 
  Brian Barker
 
 
  For those who are interested, it's possible to generate the various
  special characters by using the U.S. International keyboard. With it,
  you can use the right Alt key to create those characters, such as ü, á,
  , £, € etc. The left Alt key works as usual.
 
  Pardon my ignorance, but could you describe how that works or where one 
  would
  find out that information? Thanks.
 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964658.aspx
 
 or a google search with e.g. alt numpad for symbols

I should have thought of that. Thanks!

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] two dots above the i in presentation.

2012-03-13 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com on Tue, 13 Mar
2012 10:13:02 -0400

 Cliff Scott wrote:
  For those who are interested, it's possible to generate the various
special characters by using the U.S. International keyboard. With it,
you can use the right Alt key to create those characters, such as ü, á,
, £, € etc. The left Alt key works as usual.
  Pardon my ignorance, but could you describe how that works or where one 
  would
  find out that information? Thanks.
 
  C
 
 Forgot to mention, you can find info on using that layout here:
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_keyboard_layout#US-International
 The Linux and Windows keyboards are very close, though not an exact 
 match, to the layout shown.

Thanks!

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] two dots above the i in presentation.

2012-03-13 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com on Tue, 13 Mar
2012 10:10:15 -0400

 Cliff Scott wrote:
  For those who are interested, it's possible to generate the various
special characters by using the U.S. International keyboard. With it,
you can use the right Alt key to create those characters, such as ü, á,
, £, € etc. The left Alt key works as usual.
  Pardon my ignorance, but could you describe how that works or where one 
  would
  find out that information? Thanks.
 
 The exact details depend on the operating system.  In Linux, there's 
 generally a Personal Settings utility, where you can select the keyboard 
 type.  In Windows 7, just click on the Start button and type language 
 in the box.  One of the items that will be listed is Change keboards or 
 other input method.  In there, select the Keyboards and languages tab 
 and click on Change keyboards.  Under English (United States), you will 
 find many different keyboard layouts.  You can select multiple keyboards 
 if you wish and select the desired one by clicking on the Keyboard icon 
 on the bar.  You can also select keyboards under other languages, such 
 as German, but then you have to select between languages by using the 
 left Alt + Shift keys.  If you just want those special characters 
 occasionally, under English (United States), add United States - 
 International.  You can, if you wish, delete the original US keyboard.  
 Since this is done at the operating system level, it works for all 
 applications.
 
 I have no idea about Macs.

Thanks for the reply. I can change the keyboard type easily as you indicated.
My real question, which I didn't clearly spell out, is: once you have the
USA International Keyboard where does one find the info as to which key
combo makes which  special letter?

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Spell check problems

2012-03-06 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Edwin Matheson mathe...@bellsouth.net on Tue, 06
Mar 2012 09:16:25 -0500

 I want to thank everyone for trying to help me with my spell check 
 problem.  However, I still have the problem.  Spell check tells me that 
 every word in my doc. is spelled wrong.  I still have OpenOffice on my 
 computer and I was able to get into the system (it usually crashes) I 
 pulled down every window in both OpenOfffice and Libreoffice and 
 compared all the settings.  English (USA) is set everywhere possible in 
 both systems.  Yet, spell check works perfectly in OpenOffice and won't 
 work at all in Libreoffice.
 
 So I have no choice but to uninstall Libreoffice and look for another 
 system.
 
 Thanks again for all your help.

Ed,

I haven't been following all the answers give to help you, but wanted to
throw out a couple of my own. You may have already tried these, but if not
they may help.

The problem you describe is not a normal problem. LO normally does spell
check fine so there has to be something in the install or setup that went
wrong so before you jump ship please try the following:

1. Close LO and rename you profile to something else than it is now, reboot
the computer then restart LO Writer. This should put you back to defaults.

2. If #1 didn't help then close LO, rename the profile again and uninstall
LO. Reboot your computer and then reinstall LO, checking the
language/dictionary settings (2 places) during the advanced install.
Hopefully this will give you a normally functioning LO.

Hope this helps.

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unsubscribing from this list

2012-01-21 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Harold Fuchs hwfa.gmanen...@gmail.com on Sat, 21
Jan 2012 00:30:56 -

 Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote in message 
 news:1327076124.1667.6.camel@dan-ubuntu...
  On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:23 -0500, drew wrote:
  On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 14:32 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
   drew wrote (20-01-12 14:25)
  
Well, maybe some of it is that we are more then happy to make it dead
simple (one click on a web page) to get them subscribed...
  
   Ah, do we offer so much service :-)
   Then indeed we should do the same for un-subscribing. (Or make
   subscribing 'difficult')
 
  *chuckling*... well I suspect that the sad truth is that even if it is
  one click on a URL in the footer of each and every email, to start the
  unsubscribe process, there will still be someone that just can't quite
  manage.
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org
 
 After just reading the instructions on how to unsubscribe from this
  list, it seems that it is made far too complex. Having
  To unsubscribe click: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
  in the footer of emails. (Surprise to some, but some html emails will
  not have this header and I don't know why.) Still we would still have to
  remind some to reply to the confirmation email they were sent by the
  mailing list.
 
 Unsubscribing by clicking a link in an e-mail assumes the person receives 
 HTML mail. Some force text only in which case the link won't work.
 
 Others *send* text only so perhaps the Unsubscribe instruction doesn't get 
 included (???) but, even if it does, it won't be clickable.
 
 There have even been people who make great contributions to this list who 
 complain about HTML e-mail.

What you say may be true for some email clients, but definitely not for all.
I'm one of those who have no use for HTML so HTML codes are stripped out as
it comes in, but the content, including links, is preserved. I just have to
double click the link to make it work.

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: percentage to get number in Calc

2011-09-26 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Mon, 26 Sep
2011 13:58:52 +0100 (BST)

It depends on what the user wants in the cell. If he wants the actual
percentage then use proper mathematical notation and write it as
(556.85/646.15)*100. That way there is no ambiguity for people or the
processor. If, however, since the percentage is used in calculations then
leave it as 556.85/646.15 and just change the cell format to percentage. That
will display the actual percentage as 86.xx, but leave the value for
calculations as .86xx.

Cliff

 Hi :)
 It's not really wrong but there needs to be some indication that it is a
 percentage figure.  The original numbers don't really warrant more than 2
 decimal places.  Another way of removing problems with ambiguity would be to
 write the equation as
 = 556.85 * 100 / 646.15
 Then it doesn't matter if  (100/646.15) is calculated first or the (556.85 *
 100), either way the answer is about the same, hopefully exactly the same.  
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 
 --- On Mon, 26/9/11, Andreas Säger saege...@t-online.de wrote:
 
 From: Andreas Säger saege...@t-online.de
 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: percentage to get number in Calc
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Monday, 26 September, 2011, 11:25
 
 Am 26.09.2011 05:58, Steve Edmonds wrote:
  Hi. A spreadsheet is a different way of working. At school we would have
  learned 556.85 /646.15*100 to calculate the percentage but formatting in
  the spreadsheet as a percentage saves multiplying by 100.
  steve
  
 
 But 86.17968 is wrong. 86.17968 does not reflect the relation between the 2 
 numbers which is 0.8617968.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] strikethrough feature

2011-08-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Maria Rechnitzer rrrah...@gmail.com on Thu, 25 Aug
2011 13:47:20 -0700

 Dear Support,
 when word processing in microsoft office (doc or xls) there is a
 strikethrough feature that allows you to mark words that you want to delete
 but stIll keep them in the text, e.g. strikethrough.
 I was not able to find this feature in Libre Office (also not in former Open
 Office). Is there such a feature? If not I suggest to add it next to the
 bold, italic and underline feature.
 
 THANKS FOR PROVIDING THIS SEVICE!
 
 I kindly ask you to let me know if the strikethrough feature exists in Libre
 Office.
 Best regards,
 Maria

Maria,

Yes it does. Go to the Edit menu and click on Changes, then click on Record
and if Show is not checked click on that to make the marks visible. You can
change how the changes are marked by going to the menu
Tools\Options\Libreoffice Writer\Changes

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How do I delete unwanted Extensions?

2011-08-22 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com on Mon,
22 Aug 2011 12:50:27 +0200

 Le 22/08/11 03:54, Cliff Scott a écrit :
 
 Hi Cliff,
 
  
  In the future when doing an install, do the custom install and hunt down and
  deselect the dictionaries/languages you don't want. I don't know about the
  other extensions, but there is likely the option for those also.
  Dictionaries/languages are listed in two lists and you need to delete them
  from both lists.
 
 
 Unfortunately, you do not a choice on the Mac as to which dictionaries
 to install or not - the app is a huge single package with no installer
 routine, just the usual clikc on disk image then drag the app to
 wherever you want it to install on your hard disk.
 
 
 Alex

Ok. Error on my part since I don't have a MAC. 

Please confirm that I understand you correctly - you are saying that there
are no install options during the install process, i.e. you have to take the
whole package as is. I find it amazing that one's hands would be tied like
that.

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How do I delete unwanted Extensions?

2011-08-21 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com on Sun, 21 Aug
2011 06:36:14 -0700 (PDT)

 I am the root user on a Mac 10.6.8, Libre 3.4.2
 I can alter all the Preferences, I can add Extensions but I cannot unlock
 these Extensions.
 The list is far too long and I want to shorten it.

You likely need to first close LibreOffice, but basically the trick is to
manually delete the extensions where ever they are on the MAC.

In the future when doing an install, do the custom install and hunt down and
deselect the dictionaries/languages you don't want. I don't know about the
other extensions, but there is likely the option for those also.
Dictionaries/languages are listed in two lists and you need to delete them
from both lists.

Cliff

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] unsubscribe

2011-08-16 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Tue, 16 Aug
2011 10:58:06 +0100 (BST)

 Hi :)
 I don't feel contempt or superior or anything.  If a person has a problem i 
 just 
 try to help if i can.  A quick copypaste is no hassle.  
 
 
 At a coffee shop we kept making a certain warning sign larger and larger.  
 Changed the font to red.  Tried exclamation marks, road-side no-entry signs.  
 Nothing seemed to work, people would walk right by.  So we switched to a tiny 
 sign with Top Secret printed at the top.  Suddenly everyone started taking 
 notice.
 
 Regards from
 Tom :)


Unfortunately some mailers don't parse the email address correctly when
pasted and cut off the +help form the email address which is why I think so
many of the end up on this list.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] unsubscribe

2011-08-16 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from planas jsloz...@gmail.com on Tue, 16 Aug 2011
20:12:42 -0400

 Cliff
 
 
 On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 13:43 -0500, Cliff Scott wrote: 
 
  ** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Tue, 16 Aug
  2011 10:58:06 +0100 (BST)
  
   Hi :)
   I don't feel contempt or superior or anything.  If a person has a problem 
   i just 
   try to help if i can.  A quick copypaste is no hassle.  
   
   
   At a coffee shop we kept making a certain warning sign larger and larger. 

   Changed the font to red.  Tried exclamation marks, road-side no-entry 
   signs.  
   Nothing seemed to work, people would walk right by.  So we switched to a 
   tiny 
   sign with Top Secret printed at the top.  Suddenly everyone started 
   taking 
   notice.
   
   Regards from
   Tom :)
  
  
  Unfortunately some mailers don't parse the email address correctly when
  pasted and cut off the +help form the email address which is why I think so
  many of the end up on this list.
  
 
 The foorer is parsed correctly at my end, using gmail/evolution/ubuntu
 11.04. Is it an improperly configured client?

In using a java based email client on WinXP it ends up with
users@global.libreoffice.org as the email address and +help as the subject.
The same client under eCS works fine so it could be the interface with XP and
the client or an issue within XP itself. Apparently Tom also has seen
incorrect parsing. Maybe if the plus sign was changed to a minus it would
work better, I don't know.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] unsubscribe

2011-07-31 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Leon Cych leonc...@gmail.com on Sun, 31 Jul 2011
18:53:59 +0100

 Unsubscribe
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 

Leon,

Check that your email client is using the correct address, i.e.
users+unsubscr...@globel.libreoffice.org. Some clients don't handle the +
correctly and drop the word after the + and put it as subject if you click on
the link or copy and paste the address.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Libreoffice message footer

2011-07-30 Thread Cliff Scott
At the risk of starting another round of arguments regarding subscribing 
unsubscribing I would like to point out that the information for
unsubscribing in the footer of messages on this list is incorrect. I just
changed my email address so I had to unsubscribe the old one and subscribe
the new one. It all went without a hitch because I checked first at the
get-help page on the Libreoffice.org website and found out that the correct
unsubscribe address is users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org, NOT
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org. 

Is there a way to get whomever is in charge of the mail list program put the
correct information in the footer? It would save a lot of hassle for people.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Libreoffice message footer

2011-07-30 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr on Sat, 30
Jul 2011 08:54:08 +0200

 Le 30/07/2011 04:07, Cliff Scott a écrit :
  At the risk of starting another round of arguments regarding subscribing 
  unsubscribing I would like to point out that the information for
  unsubscribing in the footer of messages on this list is incorrect. I just
  changed my email address so I had to unsubscribe the old one and subscribe
  the new one. It all went without a hitch because I checked first at the
  get-help page on the Libreoffice.org website and found out that the correct
  unsubscribe address is users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org, NOT
  users+h...@global.libreoffice.org. 
 
 Please read more carefully the text of the footer. It does not tell you
 the address where to send a message to unsubscribe but the address where
 to write to get the instructions how to unsubscribe. I guess this
 indirect procedure is useful because you need to be informed that you
 will have to answer to the confirmation request.

Thank you. That was also pointed out to me by someone else. I took it to mean
the actual address which it is not. Possibly it could be clarified by putting
it similarly to this: For unsubscribe instructions email to:
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org or something to that effect. From all the
hassle I've seen others go through in the past I'm not the only one to
misinterpret the present wording.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] help

2011-07-30 Thread Cliff Scott


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] help

2011-07-30 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com on
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:47:41 +0200

 Hi Cliff, 
 
 On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:35:37 -0500
 Cliff Scott ae...@qsl.net wrote:
 
 help with what? 
 Can you be a bit more verbose please? 
 
 Sigrid

Sigrid,

Thanks for asking. That email was not supposed to go to this list. I was just
seeing what the Unsubscribe email address in the message footers would do and
found that the format of the email address is not read correctly by my email
client so it takes the +help off the address and puts it into the subject. I
didn't catch that until it went. 

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Libreoffice message footer

2011-07-29 Thread Cliff Scott
At the risk of starting another round of arguments regarding subscribing 
unsubscribing I would like to point out that the information for
unsubscribing in the footer of messages on this list is incorrect. I just
changed my email address so I had to unsubscribe the old one and subscribe
the new one. It all went without a hitch because I checked first at the
get-help page on the Libreoffice.org website and found out that the correct
unsubscribe address is users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org, NOT
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org. 

Is there a way to get whomever is in charge of the mail list program put the
correct information in the footer? It would save a lot of hassle for people.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] New User: Three Questions

2011-07-19 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from David B Teague sr davidbtea...@comporium.net on
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:56:27 -0400

 On 7/19/2011 9:09 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
 
1.) When LO is invoked it displays a box of icons in the middle of the
  application window. Where do I change the start up option so I see 
  either a
  blank window or a new writer document instead of this icon box? 
 
 Are you using Windows? If so, I am certain there is a way, but I 
 sidestep the issue by keeping an empty writer document on my desk top. I 
 start that and click the new document at the upper left. I do have to 
 choose where to save if different from the default. I thought this 
 easier than fighting the run box as suggested elsewhere.
 
 You can prefer to create a shortcut, giving the item the short cut 
 wizard requests as a path to swriter.exe. On my 64 bit W7 machine it is
 C:\Program Files (x86)\LibreOffice 3\program\swriter.exe
 YMMV.
 
 The answers given by others to your remaining questions are better than 
 what I can come up with.

I know he isn't using Windows, but FYI, under Windows there is a folder in
your program list with icons for each of the functions, i.e. Writer, Calc,
etc. Just make a copy of the shortcut and put it on your desktop or quick
start bar.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] tabs in LibreOffice - like you can do for MS-Word?

2011-05-27 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
webmas...@krackedpress.com on Fri, 27 May 2011 15:53:44 -0400

 On 05/27/2011 12:19 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
  At 11:14 27/05/2011 -0400, Nobody Noname wrote:
  I just read a article about adding tabs to Word that allows you to 
  have multiple Word documents own in tabs, like you have for Firefox 
  or IE.  The lady was saying that she had 4 or 5 Word documents open 
  at the same time and the tab option.  She said she would be lost 
  without web browsers having tabs, so it just makes sense to have such 
  an option in Word.
 
  So I was wondering if anyone knows any add-on to LibreOffice that 
  would allow multiple Writer docs open at the same time in without 
  having multiple instances of LO open at the same time.  That would 
  make life easier sometimes.  Since OOo's extension site is not 
  working half the time, I thought someone here might know of such an 
  extension.
 
  I think you are missing the point here!  If you open, say, Internet 
  Explorer, when it's already running, you get another instance.   Tabs 
  change that - don't they? - so that you can have multiple pages within 
  one instance.  But it's been a very long time since Word has behaved 
  like that: if you start Word when it is already running, it merely 
  opens another document in the same instance of the program.  This is 
  despite your seeing separate windows.
 
  In fact, OpenOffice and LibreOffice are already ahead of that, since 
  they are integrated suites, so you can even open multiple documents of 
  different types in one instance of the program.  You can have a text 
  document and a spreadsheet both open in the same instance of the suite 
  (which is why it's sometimes unhelpful to think of Writer and Calc as 
  being separate programs).  Try opening a spreadsheet from within Word 
  or a text document from within Excel: no joy!
 
  The way you move between multiple documents in applications is 
  generally using the Window menu - and this works in OpenOffice and 
  LibreOffice as in anything else.  And with these suites, you even get 
  all open documents, even if of different types.  (With the ribbon, 
  this appears under View | Window in recent versions of Word.)
 
  What you could be asking for, then, is not the ability to have 
  multiple documents open in a single instance - which is already here - 
  but simply a move from a Window menu to tabs as a way of handling them.
 
  Unless I misunderstand things ...
 
 I do not deal with more than 1 to 3 different office type of documents 
 at a time.  But for the person who writes books, papers, and other 
 things like that, could have the main document in one tab, the 
 bibliography in a 2nd, a footnote section in a 3rd, notes and other 
 research in still others. Then tabbing between documents might be easier 
 than between programs shown on the task bar.  I know of one author 
 that went from StarOffice to OOo and from Windows to Linux since he used 
 a different style of keyboard, instead of QWERTY, and Linux was easier 
 to setup that keyboard that was easier for him to use.  He also wrote 
 his own macros to do functions he needed, or wanted, that would help him 
 write his 3 to 5 paperback novels a year.  His wife still use Windows 
 since they could not get the Linux machine to work with the dial-up 
 modem.  I do not know if he will be moving over to LibreOffice, not that 
 Oracle owns the rights to the name.
 
 I think the tabbed document idea would work great for the type of work 
 he described doing in his author's note at the end of most of his books, 
 or his monthly blog.  For me having tabbed web pages in Firefox works 
 for my need to page back and forth between web documents to keep up 
 with weather reports[2 pages], hourly/daily reports on what my computer 
 is doing with BOINC, several LibreOffice related pages including several 
 wiki pages, and whatever other web pages I need to keep an eye one and 
 do not want to have to open up every time I want to see some info.
 
 If I wanted to deal with writing, like I use to work on for thesis 
 papers, I thing having a tabbed work environment would help keeping all 
 the various documents together and arranged more neatly than the ways I 
 had to deal with in the past.  Also it would give me only one listing in 
 the task bar realistate when I have to have many different programs open 
 at the same time.  I currently have a simple schedule, computer monitor, 
 BOINC manager, LibreOffice, Thunderbird-main, this email in Thunderbird, 
 and FireFox [with its own 7 tabs].  If I had to have 3 or more 
 LibreOffice documents open, the task bar package names would get too 
 small to mean anything to identify which LO task belongs to which 
 document.  I once has over 15 tasks open at the same time, and it was a 
 pain.  Tabbed document management withing LibreOffice would reduce that 
 mess sometimes.

Organizationally I can see it as 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: tabs in LibreOffice - like you can do for MS-Word?

2011-05-27 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from plino pedl...@gmail.com on Fri, 27 May 2011
15:27:13 -0700 (PDT)

 Are you aware that, at least
 in Win. that you can move between documents using Alt+tab? I find that much
 faster than trying to use a mouse. If you have a bunch of tasks running
 it's
 not so handy, but normally you are only switching between a few windows and
 it is very quick. 
 
 Are you aware that if you press Ctrl+Tab you can do the same between
 documents (or tabs) within the same program? :)
 

That works also, but ALT+Tab for me, is an easier finger movement and Win
treats each document in LO or OO as a separate window so if I have to bounce
between two LO windows either one accomplishes the task.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Calc Conditional Formatting Help button

2011-05-24 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org on
Tue, 24 May 2011 08:25:24 -0700

 Oddly, I am unable to get the local help to be used.  I thought it might be
 because the VM had no Java JRE installed, but I did that and repaired both
 LO3.4.0rc1 and the LO3.4.04c1 Help Pack, but I still only get the online web
 pages.  Hmm ...

I had that happen when I first installed LO and told the Help File install to
put the help files somewhere else than the default. Same result. Finally I
reinstalled and let it put the files where it wanted and it worked fine after
that.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Update and extension grizzles and aggravation

2011-04-28 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com on Thu,
28 Apr 2011 07:31:57 -0400

 On 2011-04-28 1:40 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  Charles Marcus wrote on Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:17:17 -0400
  Two? I have only ever had to deselect all of the other dictionaries, the
  language itself is usually only defaulted to install English.
 
  Or is there another one I've been missing that accounts for why the
  properties in 'Add/Remove Programs' still shows the hug string of every
  single language even though I only want/need English?
 
  It still normally installs a whole list of language packs, but doesn't use
  them unless you later request to change languages.
 
 Not when I've installed it (dozens of times now) - it only has two
 languages seletced by default - EN-US and EN-UK (I think, that's from
 memory)... but I know it is only the dictionaries I have to deselect-all
 then select only the english...
 
 This is on Windows, both XP and 7...

Interesting. I've only installed it four times. Twice under XP and twice
under Win2K. The first install in each OS, 3.3.0, installed all the extra
stuff because I didn't know any better. When upgrading to 3.3.1 I deselected
all the extra stuff and it did as it should. It's been quite a while now so
maybe my memory is failing me, but as I recall it there were extra languages
installed both times I installed 3.3.0 and not when installing 3.3.1.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Update and extension grizzles and aggravation

2011-04-27 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Gordon Burgess-Parker gbpli...@gmail.com on Tue,
26 Apr 2011 08:46:18 +0100

 On 26/04/2011 03:07, Cliff Scott wrote:
 
  You can solve your own problem by deselecting them during installation. They
  only install because they are selected by default, which IMHO should not be
  done. It takes a minute or so, but there are two lists that you have to go
  through and deselect all the dictionaries and language stuff you don't want
  to install.
 
 Well I looked at the Custom install options and couldn't see any 
 dictionaries to de-select there - did I miss something?

Open up the item Optional Components. In there you will fine a whole list
of stuff inclucing Dictionaries and Language Packs. LMB on the + to open up
the list and set them as you wish.

--
Cliff


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Update and extension grizzles and aggravation

2011-04-27 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com on Tue,
26 Apr 2011 11:17:17 -0400

 On 2011-04-25 10:07 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
  You can solve your own problem by deselecting them during
  installation.
 
 But you also have to choose 'Custom Install' first to be able to
 deselect them.
 
  They only install because they are selected by default, which IMHO 
  should not be done.
 
 +1000
 
 The only language related stuff that should be selected by default is
 the detected language version of the OS itself.
 
  It takes a minute or so, but there are two lists that you have to go 
  through and deselect all the dictionaries and language stuff you
  don't want to install.
 
 Two? I have only ever had to deselect all of the other dictionaries, the
 language itself is usually only defaulted to install English.
 
 Or is there another one I've been missing that accounts for why the
 properties in 'Add/Remove Programs' still shows the hug string of every
 single language even though I only want/need English?

It still normally installs a whole list of language packs, but doesn't use
them unless you later request to change languages.

--
Cliff


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Update and extension grizzles and aggravation

2011-04-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Gordon Burgess-Parker gbpli...@gmail.com on Mon,
25 Apr 2011 17:35:40 +0100

 1. I cannot understand why there is STILL no upgrade function in LO. I 
 had 3.3.1 and in order to upgrade to 3.3.2 I had to download the whole 
 220 MB. Now I know that's not a lot, but for those on capped and/or slow 
 connections it IS a lot.
 2. In the old installation of 3.3.1 I had removed all the non-English 
 dictionaries (after a long search on how to do this - WHY is there not 
 an easy dictionary removel method?) and after downloading the GB version 
 of the new install file, IT RE-INSTALLED ALL THE NON-ENGLISH 
 DICTIONARIES! What on earth is the point of a GB install file when it 
 just replaces all the non-English dictionaries that I had to 
 painstakingly remove previously? GRR.
 Come on LO. Get your act together

You can solve your own problem by deselecting them during installation. They
only install because they are selected by default, which IMHO should not be
done. It takes a minute or so, but there are two lists that you have to go
through and deselect all the dictionaries and language stuff you don't want
to install.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Description is not retained

2011-03-07 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from James Wilde james.wi...@sunde-wilde.com on Mon, 7
Mar 2011 23:01:28 +0100

 LibO 3.3.1 on Mac OSX 10.6.6.
 
 I have a number of copies of one particular document, each copy of which
 differs in some respects from others.  There is, for example, the original
 file with certain formatting attributes.  Then there is a copy of this which
 has more formatting attributes to make it suitable for conversion to a mobi
 ebook.  There is a third copy which differs again, and is intended for
 conversion to epub format, and so on.
 
 Apart from having them in different folders, and with slightly different file
 names, I need to know exactly what changes I have made in each file, and I
 thought that the Description tab of the Properties window would be ideal for
 this purpose.  I assumed this would be some kind of metadata.  However, I
 have now discovered that information entered in this window is not preserved
 when closing the file and re-opening it.
 
 Have I missed something, or is this a bug in the Mac version?

Actually this is a bug in all versions it seems. If you save the file
before closing it will be saved.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Calc copy/paste problem

2011-03-06 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org on
Sun, 06 Mar 2011 08:38:41 +0100

 Hi Cliff,
 
 Am 05.03.2011 23:03, schrieb Cliff Scott:
 
  Now I have to figure out how to write a macro to select the correct Paste
  Special option and paste in one key stroke operation. Pulling down the
  options from the Paste toolbar object makes it a two click process which
  isn't bad, but the keystroke macro would be ideal.
 
 Do you really think a macro is worthwhile for that? Without a macro,
 it´s only three keystrokes maximum anyway:
 
 (1) CTRL+SHIFT+V
 (2) type the first character of the desired option, if necessary
 (3) ENTER
 
 done. ;-)

True! It would be an interesting challenge as I have not written one in LO
yet and yes, I suppose I'm a little bit of a perfectionist, trying to make it
the most efficient as possible.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Calc copy/paste problem

2011-03-04 Thread Cliff Scott

 Hi Y'all,
 
 I've run into a major issue with Calc from LO and OOo and was wondering if
 anyone else had seen it and if there was a way around it.
 
 I have an Excel Spreadsheet that has a number of pages with about 10 columns.
 Most pages have 2 hidden columns and the 2nd hidden column's value is from a
 table lookup on another sheet in the same spreadsheet. I use this to
 calculate billing on the usage of a number of aircraft. The table lookup is
 based on date and aircraft number. I want to copy the rows for the current
 billing period to Writer to submit a billing report to finance. I've always
 just used Excel and Word to do it with no problems. In trying to switch to LO
 when I paste to Writer I get a blank frame box. Double clicking on the box
 brings up a mini spreadsheet and working with that I can eventually get the
 copied rows to display, however the total column comes up with a Err 501.
 Expanding the hidden columns is no help. The table look up column also shows
 Err 501 after pasting. An indication of the source of the problem may be that
 Writer shows the paragraph type as OLE. If I do the copy from Excel and paste
 to Writer all is well. Also if I copy from a page with no table look up it is
 ok so the problem seems to be that I tries to link to the table rather than
 just copying the displayed values. Help! I would really like to move to LO
 with this. Any suggestions gratefully received.
 
 --
 Cliff

I posted the above several days ago and have had no replies so looking over
what I wrote thought that maybe I need to clarify things.

I have imported an Excel spreadsheet into Calc. No problems, it comes in just
fine.

What I want to do is mark a block of several rows and columns, copy the
displayed values as a table and paste into a Writer document. The unusual
situation here is that there are 2 hidden columns and the values in those
columns are calculated to give me the col.  row numbers to do a table lookup
which with other data in cells in that row is used in the calculation of the
value that appears in the total cell for that row. 

My problem is that when I do a copy from Calc and then paste into Writer that
what shows up in Writer is an empty Frame box. If I double click in the box
then a mini spread sheet appears and I can scroll and expand it to get the
block of data that I wanted with one exception - the total cells now say Err
501 and not the values that were displayed in Calc. The paragraph type is
also set to OLE which I think is the problem.

The real question is: How do I get it to just copy the values and not be
fancy and try to link to what ever it is trying to link to. In Excel this
works fine, although it copies even the hidden columns and their values, but
I can deal with this if necessary. LO doesn't copy the hidden columns which
is great, but for some reason won't copy just the value in the calculated
cell. If I unhide the two columns then one is copied ok, but the other also
has an Err 501.

Has anyone encountered a problem similar to this? Is there a setting to tell
it to copy just the cell values without trying to link anywhere?

Ideas? Thanks for any and all suggestions.

BTW, OOo also does the same thing.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Spell check can't spell?

2011-03-01 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Leslie D. Martin
alaskahome1959.mailingli...@gmail.com on Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:03:57 -0800

 Using US english dictionary spell checker misses misspelled words. I can
 have a document with multiple confirmed spelling errors and LO doesn't seem
 to find a single one of them when I run spell check after the fact (for
 example, an imported or cut and paste document). It does seem to work fine
 in spell as you type mode, however.
 ---
 Leslie D. Martin

I suspect the problem is that you need to specify a language. You can check
if you have a default language set by looking at the status line at the
bottom of the window. The third field from the left should have English
(USA) or what ever language you have set. If nothing is there then go to
menu item Tools/Options/Lanuage-settings/Languages and set the default
language for your documents.

You can also set language specifically for the current document in Menu item
Tools/Language and set it for what ever part of the document you want.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Footer not printed completely or not at all

2011-02-27 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Riemer rie...@thalen.nl on Sun, 27 Feb 2011
04:58:41 -0800 (PST)

 Sometimes footers are not printed. On other pages of the same document, they
 sometimes show up correctly.
 Also, a three line footer is printed only partially.
 The footers are displayed on the screen and the PDFs are OK as well. The
 printed PDFs show all footers completely. but printed .odt or .doc files do
 not.
 Does anyone know what may cause this problem? It is inherited from OOo. It
 has nothing to do with cleaned-up code or anything the LibO developers did.
 
 Set-up: Ubuntu 10.9, LibO 3.3, printer HP deskjet 840C
 
 Thanks for any suggestion.

What is the bottom margin on the page? Most of the older HP Inkjets need
about 0.6 free space at the bottom.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1

2011-02-25 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Thorne thorne.olin...@gmail.com on Fri, 25 Feb
2011 10:24:58 -0500

 How do I upgrade my libreoffice install? I have win xp home with sp3..
 there is no update setting on my install...

Install over the top of the last one. If you do that then you keep all the
setups and extensions.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] comments are disappearing

2011-02-24 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from John McAtee jlm_connect...@yahoo.com on Wed, 23
Feb 2011 18:56:53 -0800 (PST)

Comments at end.

 List
  
 I created a file in LO called TEST with a comment and saved as xlsx.
  
 I used 7zip to unzip the TEST.xlsx file and found that it created a folder
 called test with three folders inside one of which is called xl.  In the xl
 folder there is an xml document called comments1.  When I opened the file in
 my browser it had the xml code that listed the cell reference and comment
 associated with that cell.
  
 That seems to answer the question. I certainly hope this helps because I too
 use Calc spreadsheets as a grade book for students and understand the panic
 this problem could create.
  
 John McAtee
 
 
 From: Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
 To: users@libreoffice.org
 Cc: Andy convenientpark...@gmail.com
 Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] comments are disappearing
 
 Hi Andy,
 
 Andy wrote (23-02-11 21:59)
  I've been using LibreOffice for a couple months now to grade student's 
  papers,
  to which I append ample comments. I've just discovered that when I save the
  document in Microsoft 2007 format and then open it up again, all the 
  comments
  I've written disappear. I know now to not use this format any more, but 
  I've now
  lost comments for about 25 papers. Is there any way to retrieve them?
 
 When you worked on the document for some time, sure there will be a backup in
 the original .odt format? (Saving as .doc does not replace the .odt).
 
 That would be the best solution, IMO.
 
 Best regards,
 Cor

I've just tried it with LO 3.3.1 and the comments are saved in both cases,
i.e. saving as .ods or as .xlsx. I did find that I had to save the
spreadsheet after adding/editing comments or they would not be saved. Of
course that is to be expected, but I verified it so am mentioning it here.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Can't subscribe to the list

2011-02-22 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Wed, 23 Feb
2011 03:00:11 + (GMT)

 
 From: Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
 To: users@libreoffice.org
 Sent: Wed, 23 February, 2011 0:34:04
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Can't subscribe to the list
 
 On 2/22/2011 11:44 AM, Paolo wrote:
  On 22/02/11 15:34, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
  I would like to subscribe to the list, but can't manage after several
  attempts
  writing to users+subscr...@libreoffice.org as specified here:
  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
 
  The problem I had is that when I click on the link the resulting
  destination address in Thunderbird is: users%2bsubscr...@libreoffice.org
  and that doesn't work. When I manually changed the address back to
  users+subscribe... then my subscription went through.
  
  I think the address, and other addresses, are wrongly encoded on the
  page http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
 
 Since it works just fine for myself and everyone else that has commented... 
 maybe the problem is more 'local'... ? ;)
 
 
 Hi :)
 Everyone that has commented does not include people that found it tooo 
 difficult to join the list.  One person persevered and even asked the list 
 for 
 help rather than just giving up.  Perhaps there is a problem but you will 
 never 
 know it if you don't listen and explore.  I also had trouble but found a 
 work-around.
 Regards from
 Tom :)

I don't know Tom's problem, but I had the same problem as started this
thread. Clicking on the email address to send the request somehow didn't
pickup the users+ so it didn't go through. After not getting the expected
automated response I looked at the email and noticed the missing part.
Correcting the address and resending resulted in the subscription going
through normally. Something, maybe with the clip board or with certain
mailers and how they handle the clip board or something causes it to not
always work as intended.

--
Cliff


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Missing MSVCR90.dll

2011-02-16 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Wed, 16 Feb
2011 15:28:03 + (GMT)

Tom,

I didn't mean I would try them all, just consider what would be the best for
me. Thanks.

Cliff

 Hi :)
 
 Lol, i didn't mean you have to try them all.  That's why i gave summary info 
 and 
 background so that you can choose to try 1 sometime.  SliTaz would be the 
 fastest to try but Ubuntu is more useful for general use.  Trinity is only 
 useful as a rescue, recovery or fix-it Cd and is rarely needed.
 
 Regards from 
 Tom :)
 
 
 
 
 From: Cliff Scott ke6...@qsl.net
 To: users@libreoffice.org
 Sent: Wed, 16 February, 2011 13:27:58
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Missing MSVCR90.dll
 
 ** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Wed, 16 Feb
 2011 09:56:28 + (GMT)
 
 Hi Tom,
 
 Thanks for all the useful suggestions. I'll look into them.
 
 Cliff
 
  Hi :)
  
  Windows just seems to do things like this occasionally.  It might have been 
  triggered by OOo (or LO) but usually this sort of thing 'just happens' or 
  is 
  done by antivirus software.  People don't seem to realise how flaky Windows 
  is 
 
  until they use linux or have had to maintain a lot of machines.  Often they 
  think Windows is the most robust and easiest!!  
  
  
  One of the advantages of having a dual-boot system (usually with a linux 
  distro 
 
  such as Ubuntu) is that you can continue using the machine and even use the 
  distro to fix Windows using the 'cheat method' you used.
  
  Instead of going to all the trouble of install an operating system 
  alongside 
  Windows (takes a couple of hours) it might be better to start with a small 
  collection of distros on Cds or Usb-sticks that allow a LiveCd session 
  with 
  tools that can help fix typical Windows problems.   LiveCd simply means a 
  bootable Cd that gets you into a working desktop session.  
  
  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCD
  Even if it is really LiveUsb we often still say LiveCd as a more generic 
  term 
  because habits are tough to break.  My favourite 3 are 
  
  
  1. Ubuntu = to get a fully functional desktop similar to Xp/Win7 complete 
  with 
 
  office apps and internet already.  This is the one i have as a 
  LiveUsb-stick 
 and 
 
  i even have it fully installed on a usb-stick for work.  The problem with 
 Live 
 
  sessions is that when you reboot no trace of the session is left on the 
  machine 
 
  unless you deliberately saved stuff to the hard-drive.  Anything saved to 
  the 
  desktop or Documents and bookmarks and history is all forgotten.  LiveCds 
  are 
 
  great for online banking.  Download links and other useful stuff can be 
  found 
  from DistroWatch
  http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ubuntu
  
  2. SliTaz = just as a LiveCd.  It doesn't have so much functionality out 
  of 
 the 
 
  box but it is only 30Mb so it downloads fast and often makes a nice Cd 
  even if 
 
  the cd/dvd-drive appears to have problems.  It does have GPartEd, a 
 text-editor, 
 
  a linux command-line, a very efficient cd/dvd burning tool called something 
 like 
 
  Gnome Baker, Gnome Office (if you are desperate!) and can install grub2 
  if 
  Windows boot-loader is broken (or even if it isn't broken yet).  The LiveCd 
  session runs entirely from Ram so you can take the Cd out once you see the 
  desktop
  http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=slitaz
  
  3. Trinity Rescue Kit = the only one of my 3 favourites that is really 
  exclusively for fixing Windows problems
  http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=trinity
  This one doesn't give a desktop anything like Windows but it does have a 
  nice 
  menu system and is stuffed full of useful apps for fixing things, 
 data-recovery, 
 
  password reset, partition editor and stacks more.  It does have tools that 
  are 
 
  good for fixing linux systems but Windows breaks more often so that is 
  where 
  it's real value is.
  
  There are a LOT of other distros and many have specific advantages (but 
  also 
  disadvantages).  Many people prefer Mint, openSUSE, Pardus, Fedora or 
  Mandriva 
 
  instead of Ubuntu but of these entry level distros Ubuntu is the most 
  famous 
 
  and appears in the mainstream press.  Mint does have more multimedia 
  already 
  set-up.  Mandriva looks pretty.  Fedora explores new features and programs 
  before other distros so it doesn't always behave but can be interesting.  
  
  
  There are a lot of distros aimed at older hardware or smaller systems but 
 SliTaz 
 
  seems to cover the widest range of newer hardware while it's focus is on 
  older 
 
  systems.  Knoppix covers a good range but mostly newer hardware and it's a 
  LOT 
 
  larger.  Wolvix Hunter 1.1.0 has a nice tutorial in its installer so it can 
  be 
 a 
 
  good one to try first to learn how to dual-boot and has very addictive 
  retro 
  space-invaders game.  Again it is a lot larger

Re: [libreoffice-users] Missing MSVCR90.dll

2011-02-16 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Luuk luu...@gmail.com on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:12:07
+0100

 On 16-02-11 14:43, Cliff Scott wrote:
  ** Reply to message from Luuk luu...@gmail.com on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 
  09:32:15
  +0100
  On 16-02-11 04:23, Cliff Scott wrote:
  I just ran into a scary situation. 
 
  I already had LO 3.3 installed on a Win2K system and working great. That
  system also had OOo 3.2.1 installed and working. I upgraded the OOo to 
  3.3 to
  compare OOo  LO and after that neither one would start. It was 
  complaining
  about the file MSVCR90.DLL missing. I searched the entire system drive 
  and it
  ..
  A better place to install this file from is:
  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326922
 
  Becausel all other missing dependecy's of that file will also be
  re-installed.
  Luuk,
 
  Thanks for the link. I must be blind. I find a discussion of it, but no link
  from which to download the file(s). Can you point me to it?
 
  --
  Cliff
 
 oops, sorry, wrong link
 
 But when i try to find the correct one, i end up at:
 http://update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdate
 Which is the link to download windows updates...  O:-) :-[ :-\
 
 But after some searching google reveald the correct link:  :-)
 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4AB7-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2displaylang=en
 it was found when searching for:
 Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable Package (x86)
 

Thanks Luuk. Got it. I suppose I should install it even if everything seems
ok just in case some other files got deleted at the same time.

--
Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Properties of Document

2011-02-14 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from lnvas _at_data.bg ln...@data.bg on Mon, 14 Feb
2011 15:58:00 +0200

 On 11 Dec 2010 Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
 
  lnvas _at_data.bg ln...@data.bg wrote on 2010-12-11 16:24:
 
  Entering/changing Properties of document -- Description
  didn't set document modified status.
 
  That was the same behaviour in older versions (3.0, 3,1, 3.2).
  But really it would be logical to set such a document to modified.
  ...
  Joachim (Germany)
 
 
 WinXP  LibreOffice 3.3.1  OOO330m19(Build:7)  tag libreoffice-3.3.1.1
 
 Calc, Draw, Formula, Impress :
 Entering/changing Properties of document Description
 do set document modified status.
 
 Writer:
 Entering/changing Properties of document Description
 does NOT set document modified status.
 Work-around: SaveAs
 
 Regards,
 Lyudmil.

I can confirm that also. OOo 3.2.1 does not have that problem. I haven't
tried it on OOo 3.3.0.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Extensions Locked in LO 3.3

2011-02-10 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Peter Hillier-Brook p...@hbsys.plus.com on Thu, 10
Feb 2011 17:23:03 +

 On 10/02/2011 03:09, Cliff Scott wrote:
 [cut]
 
 
  I did a modify install and all dictionaries except EN were already
  marked not to install. There were no options to remove them in the
  Extension list. These unwanted extensions are all kinds of
  dictionaries like Russian, Vietnamese, Swiss and many more. Why are
  they there when the install program was instructed not to install
  them? Does anyone else see this?
 
  Cliff
 
 Yes! It's bl***y annoying, isn't it? I tried a root login (and admin in 
 Win 7) to no avail so it's not just a permissions thing. I suppose a bit 
 of manual hacking would fix it, but I don't really want to waste my time 
 on that.

Peter,

Thanks for the response. At least I'm not the only one. I suppose I could go
into the Extension directory and delete the files, but if there's some index
somewhere that now doesn't match up with the contents it may cause other
issues.

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[libreoffice-users] Extensions Locked in LO 3.3

2011-02-09 Thread Cliff Scott
I just looked at the extension manager this evening for the first time since
I wanted to install some extensions. I found a long list of extensions for
various languages that I didn't install. The problem is that I want to remove
those extensions, but they are all locked. There is a lock image in the
right hand corner and there is no remove button. How do I get rid of this
extra stuff that I don't need?

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Extensions Locked in LO 3.3

2011-02-09 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from besr besr2010-...@yahoo.es on Wed, 09 Feb 2011
23:41:48 -0300

 El 09/02/2011 11:37 p.m., Cliff Scott escribió:
  I just looked at the extension manager this evening for the first time since
  I wanted to install some extensions. I found a long list of extensions for
  various languages that I didn't install. The problem is that I want to 
  remove
  those extensions, but they are all locked. There is a lock image in the
  right hand corner and there is no remove button. How do I get rid of this
  extra stuff that I don't need?
 
 They change the type of extensions adding like 3 type more, user,¿?, and 
 for you question the extensions which are installed with the installer of LO
 Those extensions(with the installed) are locked and they have to 
 uninstall with a custom install/repair installation of LO.

I did a modify install and all dictionaries except EN were already marked
not to install. There were no options to remove them in the Extension list.
These unwanted extensions are all kinds of dictionaries like Russian,
Vietnamese, Swiss and many more. Why are they there when the install program
was instructed not to install them? Does anyone else see this?

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Question

2011-02-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk on Fri, 4 Feb
2011 08:08:48 + (GMT)

 Ahah, i think you have to download the 2nd file as advised in quite a few 
 places 
 in order to get help-files downloaded onto your machine.  Many people would 
 consider the help-files extra bloat and struggle to keep their system 
 bloat-free.  At least i think that is how it works with most OpenSource 
 programs.
 
 Regards from
 Tom :)

Tom,

If you reread my original post you will see that I did that.

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Question

2011-02-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com on
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:23:24 +0100

 Hi, 
 
 Cliff, you hijacked a thread (meaning replying to an email and only
 changing the subject). Please ask new questions in a new thread (by composing
 a new message and not replying). 
 
 Your email appears in a different thread in my mail client. So you might get
 less responses to your question. 
 
 Thanks. 
 
 On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:52:15 -0600
 Cliff Scott ke6...@qsl.net wrote:
 
  Greetings everyone,
  
  I've used OOo for a number of years. Today I installed LibreOffice to see 
  how
  it did. So far so good, but one glitch that maybe someone can help me with.
  
  After the install on WinXP I ran the Help files installer supposedly
  successfully. My problem is that I cannot for the life of me figure out how
  to get the offline help to work. F1 or the Help menu always brings up the
  online help. I am not always connected to the Internet so getting the 
  offline
  help working is important to me. I've spent quite a bit of time searching 
  for
  answers online, but with no joy. Have I just overlooked something simple?
  Thanks for any help anyone can give.
 
 Which version did you install? Did you also install the corresponding
 language pack? If I remember correctly, you have to install
 
 1. software package
 2. language package
 3. help package
 
 In this order. 
 
 I agree, that this is unfortunate. I don't know, if this is well explained on
 the download page or not. If not, it should be added there, so that the user
 doesn't get a surprise of a not working local help. 

Thanks for our response Sigrid. I did indeed hijack a thread not knowing it
would make any difference at all. I'll take your suggestion regarding
starting a new thread in the future.

I downloaded and installed the LibreOffice 3.3 US English Multi version, i.e.
not the universal one will all the other languages. I started LO then
realized that the help went online and remembered that I had to install the
help package. I closed LO installed the help package and tried again, but it
still goes directly to the online help. I even restarted the computer.
Finally I ran the setup from the help directory and told it to check
everything which it did, but still no help. I wonder if the problem was
running LO before installing help. Maybe I should uninstall everything and
reinstall and see if it helps.

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: WinXP LibO offline help

2011-02-04 Thread Cliff Scott
** Reply to message from lnvas _at_data.bg ln...@data.bg on Fri, 4 Feb 2011
16:25:12 +0200

 On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:52:15 -0600
 Cliff Scott ke6...@qsl.net wrote:
 
  ...
  I've used OOo for a number of years. Today I installed LibreOffice to see 
  how
  it did. So far so good, but one glitch that maybe someone can help me with.
  After the install on WinXP I ran the Help files installer supposedly
  successfully. My problem is that I cannot for the life of me figure out how
  to get the offline help to work. F1 or the Help menu always brings up the
  online help. I am not always connected to the Internet so getting the 
  offline
  help working is important to me. I've spent quite a bit of time searching 
  for
  answers online, but with no joy. Have I just overlooked something simple?
  ...

Hi Everyone,

Thank you to all who made suggestions on how to solve my problem.

I solved the problem by uninstalling both the help and program files, rebooting
and then reinstalling everything. I think the issue may have be complicated by
the fact that the first time I installed the help files I installed them to
their own directory and not to the root of the LibreOffice installed directory
as is normal. Even though it was allowed, apparently the link was not setup to
the new directory so the program didn't see the files. Bug???

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[libreoffice-users] Question

2011-02-03 Thread Cliff Scott
Greetings everyone,

I've used OOo for a number of years. Today I installed LibreOffice to see how
it did. So far so good, but one glitch that maybe someone can help me with.

After the install on WinXP I ran the Help files installer supposedly
successfully. My problem is that I cannot for the life of me figure out how
to get the offline help to work. F1 or the Help menu always brings up the
online help. I am not always connected to the Internet so getting the offline
help working is important to me. I've spent quite a bit of time searching for
answers online, but with no joy. Have I just overlooked something simple?
Thanks for any help anyone can give.

Cliff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***