Re: Potential HTTPS redirects bug with deactivated js
Thanks for the response Sven!
Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5522
Dmitriy
2014-02-27 12:22 GMT+01:00 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net:
Hi Dmitriy,
this is a bug in WebPageRenderer, so please open a Jira issue.
A simple non-ajax button exposes the problem too, no need to tinker with
deactivated JS:
form.add(new AjaxButton(ajaxGo, form){});
form.add(new Button(go));
Please change your quickstart before attaching it to the issue.
Thanks
Sven
On 02/27/2014 11:45 AM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if that a realy bug, but here is the description:
Activated JS: Start the quickstart - Press the submit button - See the
secured page with https!
Deactivates JS: (NoScript Firefox Plugin): Start the quickstart - Press
the submit button - See the secured page BUT with HTTP!
There was no proper https redirect.
If I change, the rendering strategy to REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER everything
works fine, but if I change the strategy to ONE_PASS_RENDER the https
forwarding does't work anymore. But only if I deactivate all scripts...
The problem is: I should use the ONE_PASS_RENDER strategy and I should
supoort No-JS :(
Thanks,
Dmitriy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Potential HTTPS redirects bug with deactivated js
There is a workaround for the problem:
Extend RedirectPage - anotate it with RequireHttps - insert this page
between source (http) and target (https) pages.
The second redirect leads to the https page!
Dmitriy
2014-02-27 13:04 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com:
Thanks for the response Sven!
Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5522
Dmitriy
2014-02-27 12:22 GMT+01:00 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net:
Hi Dmitriy,
this is a bug in WebPageRenderer, so please open a Jira issue.
A simple non-ajax button exposes the problem too, no need to tinker with
deactivated JS:
form.add(new AjaxButton(ajaxGo, form){});
form.add(new Button(go));
Please change your quickstart before attaching it to the issue.
Thanks
Sven
On 02/27/2014 11:45 AM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if that a realy bug, but here is the description:
Activated JS: Start the quickstart - Press the submit button - See the
secured page with https!
Deactivates JS: (NoScript Firefox Plugin): Start the quickstart - Press
the submit button - See the secured page BUT with HTTP!
There was no proper https redirect.
If I change, the rendering strategy to REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER everything
works fine, but if I change the strategy to ONE_PASS_RENDER the https
forwarding does't work anymore. But only if I deactivate all scripts...
The problem is: I should use the ONE_PASS_RENDER strategy and I should
supoort No-JS :(
Thanks,
Dmitriy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Best way to do authentication in external system
I think the 4-th option will be the best way to do it. As an external solution you can consider Spring Security or Apache Shiro 2014/1/16 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org Hi, 4) Add a Servlet Filter *before* WicketFilter in web.xml The new filter will check whether there is an authenticated user or not and do whatever is needed Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Илья Нарыжный phan...@ydn.ru wrote: Guys, Please advice me. What's the best way to implement authentication in external system(support of Single Sign On)? I know 3 variants, but all of them have different pros and cons. 1) Implement your own IRequestCycleListener. You are intercepting all requests, finding out those that should be authenticated externally and proceeed with proper operations (commonly redirect to external system). 2) Implement of IREquestMapper. HttpsMapper can be taken as some kind of example. 3) Override restartResponseAtSignInPage() and redirect to external system if required. So, what is the best one? May be you know more variants? Thanks, Ilia
Disabling of the Textfields and update of the model
Hi everyone, I have a problem with textfield enabling/disabling and with update of the appropriate model. I have a wizzard with 3 steps: - Step one: show some info fields - Step two: let the user edit his info with textfields - Step three: show the user new info. Now I built an ajaxcheckbox in the form with input fileds. With the checkbox I can manage what textfields are enabled or disabled. I made it like described here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10282232/disable-input-text-in-wicket But the Problem is, that the model of the disabled fields doesn't update itself anymore. I have then following situation: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 info a field a new info a info b field b new info b info c field c - deaktvated old info c Is it possible to force the model to update itself? The textfields are in the form and it is a ususal form handling. Regards, Dmitriy
Re: FormComponent independent from the Model/Model object
Thanks to all! I used the Marios approach... The workaroud with another
Model worked perfectly. :)
@Richard: Everything is possible with javasript, but if wicket offers a
huge feature set, I see no need to use js...
Regards,
Dmitriy
2013/7/10 Paul Bors p...@bors.ws
You don't want an empty model either, just declare a class field and use a
PropertyModel instead.
Like so:
public class MyPanel {
// Add the field and its getter/setter (not shown here)
private boolean myCheckBoxState;
public MyPanel(id, IModelMyObj model){
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModelMyObj(model);
FormMyObj form = new Form(id, model);
// Specify a different model for your form fields that are
independent of MyObj
form.add(new AjaxCheckBox(anyStupidId, new
PropertyModelMyPanel(myCheckBoxState, MyPanel.this));
add(form);
}
}
~ Thank you,
Paul Bors
-Original Message-
From: Joachim Schrod [mailto:jsch...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:27 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: FormComponent independent from the Model/Model object
Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a dummy question:
If I have a panel with a form (not everything is my code) -
public class MyPanel{
public MyPanel(id, IModelMyObj model){
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModelMyObj(model);
FormMyObj form = new Form(id, model);
form.add(new AjaxCheckBox(anyStupidId);
add(form);
}
}
And I want to add a Component (AjaxCheckBox) to the form above, but
this component shouldn't have anything to do with a model object.
Why don't you construct it with an empty model object, i.e., with new
Model()? Then the CPM from the panel is not accessed.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
Email: jsch...@acm.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
FormComponent independent from the Model/Model object
Hi everyone,
I have a dummy question:
If I have a panel with a form (not everything is my code) -
public class MyPanel{
public MyPanel(id, IModelMyObj model){
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModelMyObj(model);
FormMyObj form = new Form(id, model);
form.add(new AjaxCheckBox(anyStupidId);
add(form);
}
}
And I want to add a Component (AjaxCheckBox) to the form above, but this
component shouldn't have anything to do with a model object. It's purpose
is just a change the state of the input fields. If I check the box the
field should be deactivated and vice versa. Nothing more.
My problem is, that Wicket thinks (and I even know why :)) the
anyStupidId is a field of MyObj and tries to change the value... Well,
the checkbox should be inside of the form, but I don't know if is it
possible to make this checkbox independent from the Model handling... How
can I tell wicket, hey dude, anyStupidId has nothing to do with MyObj, it
is really just a stupid id
Regards,
Dmitriy
Re: Empy choices durring unit tests with DropDownChoice
:)) You should better dive into your new project :)) It didn't work... And I don't have any idea why... The constructor (id, myModel, choicesModel, renderer) didn't work too :)) But the example is too complicated to discuss it here. But it works fine if I use this: (id, choisesModel, renderer) and then getConvertedValue (in the overriden submit of the form above ) Dmitriy 2013/6/18 martin.dilger martin.dil...@googlemail.com Dmitriy, Dmitriy...:) Never ever call getObject() on your LoadableDetachable Model in the Constructor of your Component (I taught you better!!:)). Should be: new DropDownChoice(aWicketId, yourModel,new ChoicesModel(), myOwnChoicesRenderer) Mind the second Parameter, as this is your Model that gets Populated on Selection, try this. You should further check whether you service has been called Mockito.verify(myService).getChoicesList() -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Empy-choices-durring-unit-tests-with-DropDownChoice-tp4659540p4659583.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Empy choices durring unit tests with DropDownChoice
Hi everyone!
I have a little problem. When I unit test a wicket panel with a
DropDownChoice I can't get the choices list into dropdown... So, that is
how I use it:
a) ... new DropDownChoice(aWicketId, new ChoicesModel.getObject(),
myOwnChoicesRenderer)
b) The choices Model ist a loadabledetachablemodel. In the load Method a
have a service call, that returns a list of choices:
load(){
myService.getChoicesList()
}
c) In the unit test itself I start the panel with:
Mockito.when(myService.getChoicesList()).thenReturn(mockedChoicesList)
tester.startComponentInThePage(MyPanel.class)...
and somewhere on the bottom of the test:
tester.getComponentFromLastRenderedPage(dropDownId).getChoices and ...
nothing happens... The mocked choices are away...
Can somebody explain me, what do I wrong?
Regards,
Dmitriy
Re: How to unit test AttributeModifier
Thanks to all! It works now! Am 08.05.2013 14:39 schrieb Kees van Dieren i...@squins.com: Another option is to use the TagTester: TagTester tester = wicketTester.getTagByWicketId(containerId); tester.getAttribute(name); // returns: anyDynamicValue Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Kees van Dieren Squins IT Solutions BV Oranjestraat 30 2983 HS Ridderkerk The Netherlands Mobile: +31 (0)6 30413841 www.squins.com Chamber of commerce Rotterdam: 24435103 2013/5/8 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org Also check AttributeModifierTest in wicket-core/src/test/java/.. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: attribute modifiers are behaviors, so use component.getbehavior(AttributeModifier.class) to get it. -igor On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello, Is it possible to unit test an AttributeModifier? I have a simple component: WebMarkupContainer container = new WebMarkupContainer(containerId); container.add(new AttributeModifier(name, anyDynamicValue)); In the unit test: WebMarkupContainer container = (WebMarkupContainer) tester.getComponentFromLastRenderedPage(containerId); Is it possible to get the modifier above? I can see it in the object state (while debugging) but I have no idea how to get it to test an anyDynamicValue... Any ideas? Regards, Dmitriy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov Wicket Training Consulting http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
How to unit test AttributeModifier
Hello, Is it possible to unit test an AttributeModifier? I have a simple component: WebMarkupContainer container = new WebMarkupContainer(containerId); container.add(new AttributeModifier(name, anyDynamicValue)); In the unit test: WebMarkupContainer container = (WebMarkupContainer) tester.getComponentFromLastRenderedPage(containerId); Is it possible to get the modifier above? I can see it in the object state (while debugging) but I have no idea how to get it to test an anyDynamicValue... Any ideas? Regards, Dmitriy
Re: Problem with markup inheritance in Wicket 6
Hi guys,
you are absolutely right. There wasn't a bug... I just overseen that there
were some changes. Other developers introduced another component with
appropriate html tag in the super class so I didn't see that.
Regards,
Dmitriy
2013/2/1 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Hi,
I think there are no changes in this area.
Do you extend/inherit the markup or completely override it ?
I expect to see wicket:extend instead of wicket:panel in
MyNewPanel.html.
Create a quickstart and attach it to a ticket in Jira please.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have another problem during Wicket 6 migration. This time it is a
problem
with markup inheritance.
I have an old wicket panel and appropriate markup file:
MyOldGoodWicketPanel MyOldGoodWicketPanel.html
Markup file looks like this:
wicket:panel
... stuff ...
/wicket:panel
Some months ago I needed for the same Panel another Markup, so what I
did:
class MyNewPanel extends MyOldGoodWicketPanel {
almost the same stuff
}
and an appropriate markup file:
MyNewPanel.html with following markup:
wicket:panel
... other stuff ...
/wicket:panel
It worked pretty well in the Wicket 1.5, but now I get Exceptions, that
the
components from the super class (MyOldGoodWicketPanel) are not found in
the
subclass/ in the markup file of the sublclass...
Can somebody explain me what happened?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: FeedbackMessage from FormComponent in Wicket 6
Thank You!
But I still don't really understand the error handling. For example I
implement the IValidator interface and if I fount an error how can I
register it in wicket 6 approach?
Old way:
if(ab){
error(validatable)
}
New way: validatable.error(new ValidationError(this)); - is it right?
2013/1/31 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Hi,
formComponent.getFeedbackMessages().getFirst(level)
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We are migrating from Wicket 1.5 to 1.6
Here is an example what we did in 1.5:
formComponent.getFeedbackMessage().getMessage().toString()
So, the FormComponent class doesn't have the method getFeedbackMessage()
anymore. But getFeedbackMessages()... Can somebody show/explain me how I
can get the formComponent feedback message with new approach?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Problem with markup inheritance in Wicket 6
Hi Folks,
I have another problem during Wicket 6 migration. This time it is a problem
with markup inheritance.
I have an old wicket panel and appropriate markup file:
MyOldGoodWicketPanel MyOldGoodWicketPanel.html
Markup file looks like this:
wicket:panel
... stuff ...
/wicket:panel
Some months ago I needed for the same Panel another Markup, so what I did:
class MyNewPanel extends MyOldGoodWicketPanel {
almost the same stuff
}
and an appropriate markup file:
MyNewPanel.html with following markup:
wicket:panel
... other stuff ...
/wicket:panel
It worked pretty well in the Wicket 1.5, but now I get Exceptions, that the
components from the super class (MyOldGoodWicketPanel) are not found in the
subclass/ in the markup file of the sublclass...
Can somebody explain me what happened?
Regards,
Dmitriy
FeedbackMessage from FormComponent in Wicket 6
Hi folks, We are migrating from Wicket 1.5 to 1.6 Here is an example what we did in 1.5: formComponent.getFeedbackMessage().getMessage().toString() So, the FormComponent class doesn't have the method getFeedbackMessage() anymore. But getFeedbackMessages()... Can somebody show/explain me how I can get the formComponent feedback message with new approach? Regards, Dmitriy
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Hi,
thank you for idea again :) But I have another question now. This textfield
belongs to wicket panel. And I don't really understand where should I place
script/script tags. Is it enough to place it in the panel.html or
should I define it in some other location?
Dmitriy
2012/11/27 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfieldhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field. Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Thank you guys, but unfortunately I have some constraints related to the
layout etc. and I can't avoid them...
Dmitriy
2012/11/28 Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com
For the placeholder thing you can use the standard HTML5 way with a
polyfill such as the following (with Modernizr it will only be loaded if
the client need it) :
https://github.com/ginader/HTML5-placeholder-polyfill
__
Cedric Gatay
http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr |
@Cedric_Gatayhttp://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Sébastien Gautrin
sebastien.gaut...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'd recommend not puting the placeholder in the input itself,
assuming you don't have to support old browsers that most other now have
stopped supporting a few years back. Depending on the browser of your
users, you can:
- use the html5 placeholder attribute (best way to do that, but you won't
support ie 10)
- have the placeholder appear in the input while it's not; one nice
technique is to use a label/span that you will move above the input with
css (using position attribute and z-index); then you have a little
javascript that will simply change the opacity of that placeholder
depending on conditions: with an initial opacity of 1, you can put it at
0.5 when the user focus the field, and at 0 once he entered anything.
Advantages of that compared to putting the placeholder in the input is
you
don't have to worry about the placeholder value being actually submitted
by
the client, and that you won't have any bloat to have the placeholder
back
if the user empty the field.
Note that for the second option, you need opacity, and thus either IE8+
or
have the proprietary ms syntax for that (IE5-7 using filter:
alpha(opacity=50);, IE8 using -ms-filter:progid:**
DXImageTransform.Microsoft.**Alpha(Opacity=50);)
Sven Meier wrote:
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the
server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfield
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should
enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I
click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field.
Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it
doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field. Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
Strange behavior of AutoCompleteTextField choice list and mouse
Hello everybody! I have a strange behavior of a text field above. When I see a choice list and try to select an entry with a enter key - no problem. But when I try to select an entry with a mouse - no chance! The selected entry doesn't appear in the text field... I added to the filed AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior and it listens on event onchange I use Wicket 1.5.5 Regards, Dmitriy
(String)RessourceModel and Location of resources in the *.props files
Hello everybody,
I have a little problem. I use in my webpages ressource models. For example:
public class MyPage{
...
add(new Label(id, new ResourceModel(myResourceKey));
...
I also have a MyPage.properties where I placed following
String: myResourceKey=Hello World! But I get whole the time Runtime
Exceptions Resource not fount etc...
When I put the string above in the MyApplication.properties - no problems...
First question is: why is it so? Why does wicket can't find my resource key
in the apropriate property but in the *aplication.properties?
Second question is: Is it possible to change this resolution way? I have
already tried the StringResourceModel but with no success...
Please Help!
Regards,
Dmitriy
Anchor and Link between different Wicket Pages
Hi Folks, I don't really unterstand how to do it. I have two Wicket Pages: Page1 and Page2 On the Page1 I define the Label, wich will be contain the anchor id. So now I want to define a link on the Page1, wich will get setResponsePage(Page1) but I also want that the user will be forwarded to the anchor on the Page1! What I don't understand ist how to do it in a right way :)? hot to set link.setAnchor(anchorComponentFromThePage1)??? Thank You!
Re: Anchor and Link between different Wicket Pages
Thank You! Well I have the second case. What I don't really understand is how to get the '#anchor'? I defined on the Page1 an anchor (Wicket Label with markupid). On the Page2 I define the BookmarkablePageLink with overriden getURL Method where I return #anchor + super.getURL(). My problem is that I don't understand how to translate my anchor-label from the page1 into #anchor to append it to the CharSequence! Regards, Dmitriy 2012/9/26 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org Hi, Case 1) both the link and the anchor are in the same page (Page1) To be able to use Link#setAnchor(Component) you need to use a Label component for the anchor and pass it to link: link.setAnchor(label) Case 2) the link is in Page1 and the anchor in is Page2 Use a BookmarkablePageLink and override its #getURL() method and just append '#anchor' to the returned url from super.getURL(); On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Folks, I don't really unterstand how to do it. I have two Wicket Pages: Page1 and Page2 On the Page1 I define the Label, wich will be contain the anchor id. So now I want to define a link on the Page1, wich will get setResponsePage(Page1) but I also want that the user will be forwarded to the anchor on the Page1! What I don't understand ist how to do it in a right way :)? hot to set link.setAnchor(anchorComponentFromThePage1)??? Thank You! -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Anchor and Link between different Wicket Pages
You know, you are a wicket god :) Thanks and have a nice day! 2012/9/26 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Thank You! Well I have the second case. What I don't really understand is how to get the '#anchor'? I defined on the Page1 an anchor (Wicket Label with markupid). On the Page2 I define the BookmarkablePageLink with overriden getURL Method where I return #anchor + super.getURL(). This should be: super.getURL() + #anchor; The value of 'anchor' can be : 1) passed as request parameter to Page2 (setResponsePage(Page2.class, paramsWithTheAnchor) 2) passed as a pure object to Page2 (setResponsePage(new Page2(label.getMarkupId( 3) a predefined value in Page1.java: label.setMarkupId(Constants.ANCHOR_VALUE) in Page2: super.getURL() + # + Constants.ANCHOR_VALUE; My problem is that I don't understand how to translate my anchor-label from the page1 into #anchor to append it to the CharSequence! Regards, Dmitriy 2012/9/26 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org Hi, Case 1) both the link and the anchor are in the same page (Page1) To be able to use Link#setAnchor(Component) you need to use a Label component for the anchor and pass it to link: link.setAnchor(label) Case 2) the link is in Page1 and the anchor in is Page2 Use a BookmarkablePageLink and override its #getURL() method and just append '#anchor' to the returned url from super.getURL(); On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Folks, I don't really unterstand how to do it. I have two Wicket Pages: Page1 and Page2 On the Page1 I define the Label, wich will be contain the anchor id. So now I want to define a link on the Page1, wich will get setResponsePage(Page1) but I also want that the user will be forwarded to the anchor on the Page1! What I don't understand ist how to do it in a right way :)? hot to set link.setAnchor(anchorComponentFromThePage1)??? Thank You! -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ChangeListener for the RadioGroup Component
Thanks! Can you describe how can I use the AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() with the label? 2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org Hi, #onSelectionChanged() works only if you override #wantOnSelectionChanged() to return true. Otherwise you can also use AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() and update the label with Ajax. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ChangeListener for the RadioGroup Component
Thanks! It was really helpful! But I am only to 99% ready :)
There is a little problem in your code example:
if I make so:
label.setDefaultModelObject(sites.getModelObject());
I get a compiler error: Cannot refer to a non-final variable sites inside
an inner class... Is there any workaround for this?
Thank you!
2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Something like:
final Label label = ...
RadioChoiceString sites = new RadioChoiceString(site, SITES);
sites.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
{
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
label.setDefaultModelObject(sites.getModelObject());
target.add(label);
}
});
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Can you describe how can I use the
AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
with the label?
2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Hi,
#onSelectionChanged() works only if you override
#wantOnSelectionChanged() to return true.
Otherwise you can also use AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
and update the label with Ajax.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ChangeListener for the RadioGroup Component
Perfect! Thank you!
2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
either make 'sites' final or use Wicket events (
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/events/ )
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks! It was really helpful! But I am only to 99% ready :)
There is a little problem in your code example:
if I make so:
label.setDefaultModelObject(sites.getModelObject());
I get a compiler error: Cannot refer to a non-final variable sites
inside
an inner class... Is there any workaround for this?
Thank you!
2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Something like:
final Label label = ...
RadioChoiceString sites = new RadioChoiceString(site, SITES);
sites.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
{
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
label.setDefaultModelObject(sites.getModelObject());
target.add(label);
}
});
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Can you describe how can I use the
AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
with the label?
2012/6/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
Hi,
#onSelectionChanged() works only if you override
#wantOnSelectionChanged() to return true.
Otherwise you can also use AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior()
and update the label with Ajax.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Panel update after Ajax Submit
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags (ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
Thanks for reply,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the panel
, then add the panel to the target.
Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of the
panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
No, the link is not on the same panel. This is actually the point that I
don't really understand. What should I add, if the link not on the panel.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it
is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags (ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
No, the panel is outside! What I just want, is that the panel shows me the
result of the submit.
But I did it :)
Hier is my solution:
1. Call in the constructor of the panel setOutputMarkUpId(true);
2. Instantiate the panel Class in the abstract Class (masterlayout) as field
and return it back with a simple getter.
3. In the AjaxSubmitLink: target.addComponent(call the getter from an
abstract class);
I don't know, if it was right, but it works now :)
What do the experts mean?
On 1 March 2011 14:04, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, if you update the panel within the form, you need to update it's submit
link component outside this panel also.
onsubmit(target){
target.addComponent(formPanel);
target.addComponent(submitLinkNotNestedInsideTheFormPanel);
}
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for reply,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the
panel
, then add the panel to the target.
Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of
the
panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
No, the link is not on the same panel. This is actually the point that I
don't really understand. What should I add, if the link not on the panel.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should
add
as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and
it
is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags
(ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form)
{
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be
updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the
addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling #refresh() on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Thank you it finally works! :)
But what I still don't understand: the problem appeared after I inserted
following in the custom session constructor:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
And why it worked with only one WicketTester constructor parameter (new
MyApplication)? And after Spring integration there schould be 2 parameters?
Thank you!
P.S. My assertion for ServletContext looks like this:
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletSession().getServletContext().getContext(WEB-INF/web.xml));
On 9 February 2011 14:27, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that your test is not actualy running in a servlet
container,
only in a wicket mocked servlet context. To access webapp resources in the
test you have to specify in the second parameter of WicketTester
constructor
where your web app's root is. Like this (in a maven project):
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MockApplication(),
target/my-webapp-name);
Assert.assertNotNull(tester.getServletContext().getResource(WEB-INF/web.xml));
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Hi,
thank you! Now I know how to get the ServletContext :) But it didn't
solve
the main problem. This time I got following exception:
IOException parsing XML document from ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]; nested exception is
java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not open ServletContext resource
[/WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml]
This is the right path. The xml file is there. It also schouldn't be a
problem with file system permissions :(
On 9 February 2011 12:57, Attila Király kiralyattila...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Try this in your application's #init() method (before calling
#refresh()
on
ctx)
ctx.setServletContext(getServletContext());
Attila
2011/2/9 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com
Thank you for reply,
yes! And I get then another exception :)
Cannot resolve ServletContextResource without ServletContext
Does andybody know how can I get/set the servletContext?
Dmitriy
On 8 February 2011 18:01, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you call context.refresh() ? like the error message said?
-igor
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new
XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication
class
is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup
and
will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same
problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance
was
created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance
is
created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
I would rather write programs to write programs than write programs.
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
my complete setUp looks like this:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
tester = new WicketTester(wicketWebApp);
pageParams = new HashMapString, String();
}
So the wickettester instance is created after the Appllication class is
overriden. Even if I extract the wickettester creation from setup and will
make it in each test (it is actually the same) I have the same problem.
After debuggin the tests I have seen that my appcontext instance was created
and the .xml file was correctly recognized :( But I still get the
exception...
On 8 February 2011 07:37, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
make sure your setup() code runs before wicket tester instance is created.
-igor
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hello everybody,
After integration with spring I have following problem:
if I add following to my CustomSession:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); (because I store some spring
beans in the custom session)
My WicketTester doesn't work anymore. I get this exception:
BeanFactory not initialized or already closed - call 'refresh' before
accessing beans via the ApplicationContext
What I have done in my Unit Tests:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
And I don't really understand what to do now :)
Can somebody help me?
P. S. The Application works. Affected are only unit tests
Re: Question about Unit Testing with custom Session
Hi,
of course. The point is if I delete this:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
from my session class everything works fine :(
On 7 February 2011 15:27, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.comwrote:
Did you provide the application to the wicket tester?
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(myapp);
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
After integration with spring I have following problem:
if I add following to my CustomSession:
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); (because I store some spring
beans in the custom session)
My WicketTester doesn't work anymore. I get this exception:
BeanFactory not initialized or already closed - call 'refresh' before
accessing beans via the ApplicationContext
What I have done in my Unit Tests:
@Before
public void setUp() {
MworldWicketApplication wicketWebApp = new
MworldWicketApplication()
{
ApplicationContext ctx = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
@Override
public void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new
SpringComponentInjector(this, ctx, true));
}
};
And I don't really understand what to do now :)
Can somebody help me?
P. S. The Application works. Affected are only unit tests
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketTester and the test of image visibility
Could you provide me a simple exmaplte how can I do that? Thank you! On 3 February 2011 18:33, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: visibility can be triggered from a lot of places, isvisible() only checks the visibility flag. the best way to test it is to see if the image tag appears in the rendered markup. -igor On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody! Is the WicketTester method isVisible() the right solution to test if the Image is shown on the webpage? Thank you! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
WicketTester and the test of image visibility
Hello everybody! Is the WicketTester method isVisible() the right solution to test if the Image is shown on the webpage? Thank you!
Problem with Wickettester and Maven
Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you!
Re: Problem with Wickettester and Maven
I don't really understand how to do that? On 1 February 2011 14:46, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add the test or provided scope servlet-api dependency in your project pom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you! -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Problem with Wickettester and Maven
Oh sorry!!! It works now! Thank you! I should add this to my pom: dependency groupIdjavax.servlet/groupId artifactIdservlet-api/artifactId version2.4/version scopeprovided/scope /dependency On 1 February 2011 14:51, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.comwrote: I don't really understand how to do that? On 1 February 2011 14:46, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add the test or provided scope servlet-api dependency in your project pom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have problems with unit testing. All the time I have used NetBeans 6.9.1 with Glassfish and there wasn't any problems. Just create a new UnitTest with WicketTester and it worked pretty fine. Today I changed the project infrastructure to Maven with surifire plug-in. The problem is following: usual unit test will be executet without failures but not the tests with wickettester. Surifire report showed me following exception: java.lang. NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpSession at de.pentasys.test.web.TestRenderPages.setUp(TestRenderPages.java:22) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.servlet.http.HttpSession at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 30 more The test itself is very simple: it checkt if the start page will be rendered. Nothing more. Any ideas? Thank you! -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Question about the Page state
Hello everybody, The question isn't really simple :) So, the official documentation says ( http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/RequestCycle.html): 1) A page that does not yet exist in a user Session may be encoded as a URL that references the not-yet-created page by class name. /[Application]?bookmarkablePage=[classname][param]=[value] [...] 2) Stateful pages (that have already been requested by a user) will be present in the user's Session and can be referenced securely with a session-relative number: /[Application]?wicket:interface=[pageMapName]:[pageId]: ... Does it actually mean, that in the second situation the page isn't bookmarkable? But my question is: where is the state of the page stored? In the Session? In the pageMap? Where is the pageMap stored and when is it created? I hope somebody could help me :) Thanks!
Re: Question about the Page state
Thank you! I am quite happy with it :) Bye On 28 December 2010 21:34, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi Dmitri, I suggest you to take a look at these two pages: https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/page-maps.html https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/page-maps.html https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/request-cycle-and-request-cycle-processor.html https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/request-cycle-and-request-cycle-processor.html martin-g On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello everybody, The question isn't really simple :) So, the official documentation says ( http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/RequestCycle.html ): 1) A page that does not yet exist in a user Session may be encoded as a URL that references the not-yet-created page by class name. /[Application]?bookmarkablePage=[classname][param]=[value] [...] 2) Stateful pages (that have already been requested by a user) will be present in the user's Session and can be referenced securely with a session-relative number: /[Application]?wicket:interface=[pageMapName]:[pageId]: ... Does it actually mean, that in the second situation the page isn't bookmarkable? But my question is: where is the state of the page stored? In the Session? In the pageMap? Where is the pageMap stored and when is it created? I hope somebody could help me :) Thanks!
