RE: Help with Wicket Adoption Numbers
It's a reference to the American cartoon Dilbert (www.dilbert.com) that is syndicated in papers. It has a nice sarcastic look at office life. -Original Message- From: Eyal Golan [mailto:egola...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:58 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Help with Wicket Adoption Numbers As my English is not my mother's tongue, even though I do speak it pretty good, what is the meaning of pointy haired bosses? I think I can understand it, but hey, I want to know if these are the kinds of bosses I encountered too often.. Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.comwrote: honestly, your response is too thoughtful. these pointy haired bosses are self-serving. they don't care about training costs or developer pain and they don't really care if their org runs efficiently. what they care about is that if there is a failure, their choice didn't cause it. which is why the old saying goes nobody ever got fired for buying IBM. same seems to go for struts. an idiotic technology choice, but you won't get fired for making the same idiotic choice everyone else is making. Loritsch, Berin C. wrote: But why choose an inferior technology just because of its adoption numbers? The pointy haired bosses that do this believe in their heart of hearts that if you choose the same technology everyone else is using that they can turn thinking developers for mindless drones. It has more to do with avoiding training costs and rational thought, and more to do with trying to turn software development into an assembly line process. Reality never fits this mold, but it doesn't stop the pointy haired boss from trying. In this respect they are eternal optimists. -Original Message- From: leo.erlands...@tyringe.com [mailto:leo.erlands...@tyringe.com] Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:09 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Help with Wicket Adoption Numbers Hi, We also had the same consideration when we chose Wicket. But why choose an inferior technology just because of it's Adoption Numbers? Also, Wicket is becoming more and more popular as people see the light :) Check out Jobs Trends (Relative Growth) here (JSF vs Struts vs Wicket): http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Struts%2C+JSF%2C+Wicketl=relative=1 We have a couple of hundred customers and so far the feedback is great both from our Developers and our Software Architects. Customers like that the GUIs are faster due to the simplicity of Ajax Adoption in Wicket. I also know that several large privately held companies in Sweden are using Wicket, as well as large Government Agencies (e.g. the Swedish Immigration Office). Sincerely yours Leo Erlandsson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Help-with-Wicket-Adoption-Numbers-tp27069702p27082 559.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: DiskPageStore file increasing to max size by only refreshing a HomePage
It's bookmarked pages that avoid new page creation isn't it? -Original Message- From: Matej Knopp [mailto:matej.kn...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 3:55 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: DiskPageStore file increasing to max size by only refreshing a HomePage SetVersioned(false) does not help with new page instances being created. -Matej On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.no wrote: about unversioned, i have just done a quick test on wicket-examples helloworld, adding serialVersionUID (not informed in the examples) and the result is the same: pagestore file increasing to the infinite (max size of course :) I meant Wicket's setVersioned(false); the serialVersionUID is just for binary serialization, as long as the fields do not change the computed value the VM generates for you should be the same. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Wicket session not threadsafe?
The session object is bound to the HttpSession, so it is as safe as Tomcat or
whatever servlet container is running your application.
Here are some things to consider that have bit me in the butt, and have nothing
to do with your local setup:
* Is that happening locally in your test environment?
* Does your client have caching proxies? (do they even know?)
* Do your response headers have the no-cache entries?
What might be happening is the first person to log in through the caching proxy
gets their information cached by the proxy. The second person comes in and
sees it. Typically the problem has to do with poorly configured proxy servers
and they don't properly distinguish the pages with the cache control headers
you supply. The only way around it is to turn off client caching completely.
-Original Message-
From: Soumya [mailto:soumya_...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:18 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket session not threadsafe?
Hi all,
I am fairly a newbie in wicket and would appreciate your help!
I
have a wicket application which are used on Live by more than 500
users. Now the problem which has arisen is - say User A logs on - he is
able to view details of User B. It has happened for different users and
I am trying to dig the real reason.
Here is my code details -
1) I use Hibernate to fetch 'Account' objects from backend passing on the
username/password.
2) I use
MyAppSession extends WebSession
{
private Account account;
public InboundSession(Request request)
{
super(request);
}
public void setAccount(Account account)
{
this.account = account;
}
public Account getAccount()
{
return account;
}
public boolean isUserLoggedIn()
{
return account !=null;
}
}
So
effectively I check if the Account object in session is null or not and
accordingly decide whether a user is logged in or not.
2) In Login class I pass on the username/password to HibernateAccountDao and
fetch the Account object.
Account account = accountDao.getAccount(username, password)
MyAppSession session = (MyAppSession )getSession();
session.setAccount(account);
setResponsePage(Home.class);
So effectively I fetch the accout object using hibernate and store it in wicket
session.
But I am not sure how these account objects are getting mixed up between users.
Please can someone lead me to the route cause of the issue?
Thanks in advance!
SSP
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.
http://in.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Wicket session not threadsafe?
Essentially your response headers should have the following headers:
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store
Pragma: no-cache
For more details on HTTP response headers and cache controls see this
page:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
Not all proxy servers are documented, unfortunately. If your system
lives in a DMZ (which it sounds like it might), then the proxy server
might be within your ISP.
-Original Message-
From: allgo [mailto:soumya_...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:44 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wicket session not threadsafe?
Hi Berin,
No the users are all from different companies and no way there woudl be
caching of their side. User A belongs to a client X say working in New
York
, while User B may be of client Y working in texas.
It doesnt happen in test environment. but then that is not a multi-user
environment in true sense of teh word. As hardly 3-4 people test it and
we
never got into that situation. For live however there are 500+ users
using
it everyday.
no-cache entry? I am bit sketchy on this one. Can you give an example?
Thanks for ur help.
Loritsch, Berin C. wrote:
The session object is bound to the HttpSession, so it is as safe as
Tomcat
or whatever servlet container is running your application.
Here are some things to consider that have bit me in the butt, and
have
nothing to do with your local setup:
* Is that happening locally in your test environment?
* Does your client have caching proxies? (do they even know?)
* Do your response headers have the no-cache entries?
What might be happening is the first person to log in through the
caching
proxy gets their information cached by the proxy. The second person
comes
in and sees it. Typically the problem has to do with poorly
configured
proxy servers and they don't properly distinguish the pages with the
cache
control headers you supply. The only way around it is to turn off
client
caching completely.
-Original Message-
From: Soumya [mailto:soumya_...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:18 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket session not threadsafe?
Hi all,
I am fairly a newbie in wicket and would appreciate your help!
I
have a wicket application which are used on Live by more than 500
users. Now the problem which has arisen is - say User A logs on - he
is
able to view details of User B. It has happened for different users
and
I am trying to dig the real reason.
Here is my code details -
1) I use Hibernate to fetch 'Account' objects from backend passing on
the
username/password.
2) I use
MyAppSession extends WebSession
{
private Account account;
public InboundSession(Request request)
{
super(request);
}
public void setAccount(Account account)
{
this.account = account;
}
public Account getAccount()
{
return account;
}
public boolean isUserLoggedIn()
{
return account !=null;
}
}
So
effectively I check if the Account object in session is null or not
and
accordingly decide whether a user is logged in or not.
2) In Login class I pass on the username/password to
HibernateAccountDao
and fetch the Account object.
Account account = accountDao.getAccount(username, password)
MyAppSession session = (MyAppSession )getSession();
session.setAccount(account);
setResponsePage(Home.class);
So effectively I fetch the accout object using hibernate and store it
in
wicket session.
But I am not sure how these account objects are getting mixed up
between
users.
Please can someone lead me to the route cause of the issue?
Thanks in advance!
SSP
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo!
Homepage.
http://in.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Wicket-session-not-threadsafe--tp27074491p27076126
.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Google analytics on home page slowing down access
Just an FYI, the call to google-analytics on the Wicket home page is causing the site to crawl as I have to wait for the connection to time out before I see anything (at least 30s). That is because the call is in the header, and it should be placed at the bottom of the body section to avoid this problem. Most browsers will be able to display the page as it is loading resources in the order they are declared. For things like google analytics and populating ads, it's best to incorporate those javascript goodies after the page is rendered. Example: Move the following snippet: html head !-- ... -- SCRIPT type=text/javascript _uacct = UA-2350632-1; urchinTracker(); /SCRIPT !-- ... -- /head /html To the following location: html body !-- ... -- SCRIPT type=text/javascript _uacct = UA-2350632-1; urchinTracker(); /SCRIPT /body /html
RE: Modal Popups and Forms
AJAX and forms highlight some issues with HTML forms in general. Unless you have declared a brand new form for your modal popup, and are absolutely sure that you are submitting that new form, you will be submitting the original form that was on the base page. Keep in mind that to the browser, the modal popup is part of the same DOM as the information beneath what the user sees--unless you actually created a new window. Browsers do not do well with forms embedded in forms, and they cause all kinds of issues. Make sure that YUI did not manufacture a DIV inside the original form. If it did, then your browser is defaulting to sending the outermost form. Use Firebug to inspect the DOM. -Original Message- From: Corbin, James [mailto:jcor...@iqnavigator.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:43 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Modal Popups and Forms Hi, I have a modal popup (implemented using YUI 2.8). The modal popup contains a form and the popup's markup is rendered (via YUI js) explicitly to document.body. The reasoning for rendering the YUI javascript to document.body is to address some issue we had with css inheritance that was causing rendering issues (conflicts with default YUI skinning) when we render the markup inline. If I change the YUI popup javascript to render inline, the issue doesn't happen, but I don't want to render the markup for the popup inline, because it potentially inherits styling that interferes with the YUI styling for the popup. Rendering the markup to document.body solves that issue. So what I know so far that I cannot change, or don't want to change, is that the YUI popup implementation needs to render its markup to document.body. I verified that the markup generated for the popup's form is indeed a div element (outside of the form tags as I would have expected) In this case, there is only one form tag (parent form where popup is initiated from) on the page and it is indeed has its encoding set to multi-part (verified in the generated markup). Note the markup for the popup dialog does not have any elements that should require multi-part encoding, but the parent form from which the popup was initiated, does. How come when I submit the dialog, I get the following exception? I guess I'm not sure what is going on and how Wicket is handling this case. java.lang.IllegalStateException: ServletRequest does not contain multipart content at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init (MultipartServletWebRequest.java:113) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.MultipartServletWebRequest.init (MultipartServletWebRequest.java:83) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.newMultipartWe bRequest(ServletWebRequest.java:500) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.handleMultiPart(Form.java:1651) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:850) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmi tBehavior.java:135) Ideas? J.D. Corbin | IQNavigator, Inc. | Technology 6465 Greenwood Village Blvd, Suite 800, Centennial, CO 80111 | Office 303.563.1503 | Mobile 303.912.0958 | www.iqnavigator.com | jcor...@iqnavigator.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Tag Oriented Development
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. .Net is a standard, Java is a standard, PERL is a standard, JavaScript is a standard. As are CSS, HTML, etc. As we all know, just because something is a standard does not mean that it is good, fits the problem, or is implemented properly or in any meaningful way. It is important to understand the thinking that goes into one of the standards. In business, the reason decision makers choose standards is because they want easily replaceable cogs that require little training. They've been trying to get software engineers to pay obeisance to this thinking for years, but the engineers can always come up with good reasons why a standard is not a good fit. The exceptional engineers can do it in a way that even the decision makers see the value in dropping a standard. -Original Message- From: Altuğ B. Altıntaş [mailto:alt...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 2:51 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Tag Oriented Development Agreed 2009/12/25 b...@actrix.gen.nz JSF == Standard? My question is: What should become a standard? When I think about standards, then things that come to mind are: - SQL - ODBC - Java - JDBC - EJB - JPA but not JSF. And not Spring. And not ... - you name it. For some reason, possibly due to the fast evolving nature of the web, web frameworks are higher up in the food chain, and I don't think that we are ready yet to standardize on that level. People may say JSF is a standard, so what? The fact that there are so many others seems to prove my point. Bernard On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:59:16 +0200, you wrote: In business, decision makers choose standards and JSF is standard so JSF is good and JSF is the King. But couldn't be The King Is Naked ?? OR Am i wrong ? JSF is really cool and i don't know the hidden features ?? I don't want to start framework wars, this is useless but I think Wicket should be a JSR. I don't know how a framework like Wicket become a JSR - a standard - but it should be... 2009/12/22 Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: @Tomas, @Martin, I already knew those links... Thanks anyway. Actually I went a bit further an implemented the same application on different technologies so that developers could evaluate for themselves the wonders of downsides of each technology... plus detailed explanations of how the code works Unfortunately I cannot share that code as is property of the company I work for That's a pretty solid approach, pity you can't share the code though. I tried to do something similar as open-source: http://code.google.com/p/perfbench/ Maybe you can contribute some analysis or even an implementation or two ;) I would be interested in your feedback, for e.g. which framework to attempt next - do let me know offline. But the problem is those who will take the final decision will take into account more political reasons that things like development speed, code quality, code re-usability and any other adds you throw at them... @Martin, Congratulations! Hope I can say the same in a few months. Best, Ernesto On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eelco, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote: I love Wicket and the natural approach it offers to do web-development... and I have been pushing hard to use it whenever possible... but on the real world it is not enough to be an excellent product to gain wide acceptance... Does last sentence ring a bell? I think we've gained pretty wide acceptance actually. Wicket In Action has been a best seller for Manning in the months right after it came out, and Wicket is by many considered as one of the leading web frameworks for Java. We've also had one of the most active email lists for years now. I'm sure Wicket lags behind JSF and Struts considerably when it comes to number of users, but hey, why would we care. You only need a bunch of serious users to maintain a framework, and Wicket has many thousands of them :-) You don't have to convince me about Wicket excellence! I love Wicket, I've been using it for over two years now, and right now I'm doing all my efforts to get it adopted at the company I'm working for... But being realistic they will probably jump to Struts 2, or Seam-JSF... After re-reading my message I see maybe it was bit pessimistic.. maybe out of my present frustration.
RE: onSubmit() not entered (IE6 and IE7)
From a strict HTML perspective, the less you have in your form the
better the page performs. From a few observations in debugging AJAX
functionality that doesn't work on past projects (not Wicket related),
you have to make sure that no Javascript exceptions are thrown at all.
Basically, IE will turn off its Javascript interpreter completely as
soon as the interpreter catches an exception. If you don't catch it and
handle it in the page properly, no further Javascript will work until
the page is reloaded.
One example is from a tool that used to be available to enable multiple
versions of IE on your Windows machine. It was a registry hack that
gave you the rendering engine for older versions of IE on your machine
(they are all there). One of the side effects of using any rendering
engine that was not the current one (IE 7 at the time I ran into the
problem) was that you could not invoke the window.print() function. If
that happened, the rendering engine threw an exception and killed all
future Javascript functions. So the popup window we had with a print
and close button would not work properly if the user hit the print
button first. The print button used window.print() and the close
button used window.close(), so the Javascript was fairly simple. As
soon as the exception was thrown, the close button ceased to work. The
multiple IE hack was the cause here, but we saw it on some of our more
complex forms as well.
When Javascript stops working on IE, no further Javascript calls will
work. Just to make sure you haven't run into this problem, add a simple
little button or link that has the javascript action alert('still
works') to your page. Once you get to the place where the page
reproducibly does not work, click on that button. If the little alert
dialog box does not open up, then IE's Javascript engine has completely
crapped out. My guess is that this is what you are running into,
without actually seeing anything.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Dietze [mailto:d...@fh-wedel.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 8:42 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: onSubmit() not entered (IE6 and IE7)
I have repeatedly run into situations like this one:
On very complex pages with lots of Ajax-stuff I sometimes get to
a point where (reproducably) my form's onSubmit() method is
never entered when submitting the form with a simple submit
button. This problem occurs in IE6 and IE7.
Usually as a workaround I ended up with one of these solutions
(putting the one I like better first):
(1) attaching the 'onSubmit()' method to the button rather than
the form
(2) making the button an AjaxButton with default form submit
behaviour set to 'true'
The first from these solutions does not work in some solutions,
so that I have to switch to the second one.
In a particular case I had today the submit button which did not
work with IE6 and IE7 was supposed to perform an upload. Due to
some issues still not resolved in wicket 1.4.3 I am currently
unable to use Ajax for uploads in my project. So I ended up with
a third workaround:
(3) moved the upload stuff to a separate form on the page
Solution (3) now works, but it is not nice, since due to the
page's layout there's no way to place the upload somewhere where
it looks nice.
Unfortunately there's no reliable way to produce this kind of
problem, at some place you'll 'just have it'. And since it
happens in complex pages it is not really possible for me to
provide example code here (commercial project, you know the
story).
Now first of all I would like to hear some comments - anyone
else experienced similar problems?
Also, as we may (almost) all agree that IE6 (and probably later
versions as well) is brain damaged software that should be
forbidden, it is still in use and needs to be suported. Thus:
is there any chance we can track down problems like this and
fix them within wicket?
Cheers,
M'bert
--
--- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org /
-
=+=
Immer Schwierigkeiten immer gerade so zu schaffen, und so macht man sich
auf
Dauer halt zum Schwierigkeitenaffen, trifft befreundete Primaten in den
Kneipen
und im Garten, wartend auf die grosse Sause oder einfach nur oder besser
noch,
die grosse Pause. -- Die Sterne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: onSubmit() not entered (IE6 and IE7)
Check out TotalValidator, a plugin and local JAR file that can be run on
internal pages to ensure your markup is correct. If the markup is bad, then
you will get unexpected behaviors.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Dietze [mailto:d...@fh-wedel.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:39 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: onSubmit() not entered (IE6 and IE7)
On Wed, December 16, 2009, Loritsch, Berin C. wrote:
When Javascript stops working on IE, no further Javascript calls will
work. Just to make sure you haven't run into this problem, add a simple
little button or link that has the javascript action alert('still
works') to your page. Once you get to the place where the page
reproducibly does not work, click on that button. If the little alert
dialog box does not open up, then IE's Javascript engine has completely
crapped out. My guess is that this is what you are running into,
without actually seeing anything.
Will do, thank you! But just to clarify things, what is not
working is not an Ajax component but an ordinary submit button.
Cheers,
M'bert
--
--- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / -
=+=
mir gbbet nix !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Modal Window Problems On Internet Explorer.
The question is whether there is a problem with Javascript or not. Setting up the debugger for IE is a pain in the arse, but worth doing when tracking down strange behaviors. Are you also having problems in Chrome or Safari? Chrome also has some javascript debugging tools, and the engine is different enough from Firefox that you may catch the offending code. -Original Message- From: victorTrapiello [mailto:vic...@trapiello.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:56 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Modal Window Problems On Internet Explorer. hahahahha I knew that someone was going to come up with this, yes it does, it works fine in the apache wicket offcial page, but when I do the example and compile it, it only works in Mozilla! maybe I do not have the last Wicket release, what do you think¿? Thanks for the reply Johan Johan Compagner wrote: Modal windows are working find for me on IE8 http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/modal-window are you saying that above example doesnt work? On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:41, victorTrapiello vic...@trapiello.net wrote: Hello guyss, I find it anoying as well I´m developing a web app and now I realize that the modal window only works in mozilla... when I try to open it wit I explorer 7 or 8 it comes up with an error page the url does not exist do you know how to fix that or it means our lovely java framewor Wickets is becoming oldfashion... Thank you very much guys!! bgooren wrote: I don't have this problem with the Modal Window, so my guess is that you have some custom javascript which tries to set the focus to an element which is either invisible or inactive. Bas carlo c wrote: Hi, I keep on experiencing this when I try to open a modal window in IE6, 7 and 8. I don't know if any of you encountered it from before. Can't move focus to the control because it is invisible, not enabled, or of a type that does not accept the focus It's happeningd on Internet Explorer only and it's quite annoying. Thanks A Lot - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Modal-Window-Problems-On-Internet-Explorer.-tp26572367p26771544.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Modal-Window-Problems-On-Internet-Explorer.-tp26572367p26799812.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket Test Harness and HTTP objects
I discovered as I implemented the SessionListener to clean up user record locks that the WicketTester object does not behave as expected in regards to the HttpSession objects. I expected to have my MockHttpSession already configured with the application session object bound in the specified location. In otherwords I would expect the following to work: MySession session = MySession.get(); HttpSession htSession = tester.getHttpSession(); assertEquals(session, htSession.get(wicket:myapp.context: + Session.SESSION_ATTRIBUTE_NAME)) This is a true condition with a deployed application, however the mapping has to be done manually by my testcase. Is this by design or is this a bug? The mock objects should provide enough imitation of reality to allow testing integration points like this a bit easier.
RE: Session stealing with wicket-auth-roles
I too would like to know the Wicket answer. The problem is that
JSESSIONID is how the Servlet container differentiates the session with
the user. It's part of the spec since the beginning. Because it is
well known and certain browsers (Firefox, representing over a third of
browser clients) make it pretty easy to look at the cookies it has
become a known weakness to people who want to do bad things.
Now, if the entire interaction is done with HTTPS, theoretically you
would be able to use the SSL session ID to match sessions. That would
be a configuration setting on your Servlet container.
The solution that some frameworks and roll your own security folks have
come up with (like Ruby on Rails) is to use a secondary token as a salt
for a secondary token. Rails uses this token for all POST requests and
uses a constant time comparison for the token (another topic
altogether). Of course, Rails stores all session data in a Cookie by
default, encrypted and hashed with the secondary token. It makes it
more difficult to steal a session that way. An approach similar to this
(without storing session data in a cookie) can be done using a
ServletFilter.
The alternative I've seen is to change the secondary token periodically
or every request. The problem with this solution is that you break the
back button when the token changes. At the very least, the secondary
token should be generated based on requestor information (IP address,
user agent, etc.). That way the token is not simply a matter of simply
matching the JSESSIONID string against a hash. You are recreating the
master token the same way and comparing it with what you received.
To summarize, I would most likely create a ServletFilter to handle the
secondary token handling. The secondary token would be a SHA-1 hash of
an application salt (random characters at least the length of an SHA-1),
the user agent, and the requesting IP address, and the Servlet session
ID. The ServletFilter either throws a 403 response, or invalidates the
session if the newly generated key does not match the secondary token
provided. Essentially, the user would have to be behind the same
firewall/gateway, have the same exact browser and patch level, and the
session id to successfully steal a session. Even within an organization
the differences in user agent strings for Internet Explorer at any
version vary greatly.
Additionally, I would use the ServletFilter to actively reject automated
clients. If the system lives in SSL, this is a valid approach because
you don't necessarily want the contents indexed. You'd be surprised how
many poorly behaving web crawlers there are out there. Many of them are
home-brewed scripts that spider your site, ignoring your robots.txt
file--even on private networks.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Turner [mailto:grim_toas...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:24 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Session stealing with wicket-auth-roles
Good morning all,
I'm hoping I've misconfigured something in my application, but we seem
to be prone to session stealing in our wicket application. We're using
wicket-auth-roles to provide the security, and if you are able to access
the jsessionid you can get another machine to log straight into the
application as the intercepted user. We're using HTTPS for the
communication, so hopefully the likelihood of this occurring is quite
small, but we are still being forced to contemplate rewriting the
security layer (which I want to avoid if possible).
So, my question, have I misconfigured something, or is it just not
possible to prevent this sort of attack when using wicket-auth-roles?
I've managed to create a completely stripped-down app that still has the
problem, below is the AuthenticatedWhenSession implementation.
public class HelloWorldWebSession extends AuthenticatedWebSession {
public HelloWorldWebSession(Request request) { super(request); }
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
return helloUser.equals(username) password.equals(password); }
public Roles getRoles() { return isSignedIn() ? new
Roles(Roles.USER) : null; }
}
And the simple page:
@AuthorizeInstantiation(USER)
public class HelloWorldHomePage extends WebPage { }
And the application:
public class HelloWorldApplication extends AuthenticatedWebApplication {
protected void init() {
super.init();
mountBookmarkablePage(home, HelloWorldHomePage.class);
mountBookmarkablePage(signin, SignInPage.class);
}
protected Class? extends WebPage getSignInPageClass() { return
SignInPage.class; }
protected Class? extends AuthenticatedWebSession
getWebSessionClass() { return HelloWorldWebSession.class; }
public Class? extends Page getHomePage() { return
HelloWorldHomePage.class; }
}
The URL below, once logged in on one machine, could then be used on
multiple machines to bypass the security layer.
It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the application?
It may seem rather basic, but I'm looking for a reasonably simple way to
globally set how the application displays dates. On rails, it was as
simple as setting that information in the l10n/i18n resource files.
I've been googling and trying to find the answer in the Wicket in
Action book, but it doesn't seem like it's something anyone's cared to
post the answer to.
At first I thought it was setting up a converter registered with the
java.util.Date class. The instructions on the Wiki provide answers on
how to do that for wicket 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3. I attempted the 1.3
solution, and my dates are not changed. Here's what I have:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator converterLocator = new ConverterLocator();
converterLocator.set(Date.class, new DateConverter() {
private static final long serialVersionUID =
194715223274764825L;
@Override
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale) {
return new SimpleDateFormat(-MM-dd);
}
});
return converterLocator;
}
The date still is displayed like: 11/12/09 12:58 PM
Am I missing something? Even more specifically, I would like to have
three styles I can switch between: date only, time only, and date and
time. I'm trying not to repeat myself if I can help it. I'd like to
default to date only and specify time or date/time when needed. I
can't seem to get the system to recognize my date only solution.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the application?
It appears that the newConverterLocator() route is about right, but I
have a slight issue between the Hibernate binding and what I want to
happen. In order for the converter to work, it looks for the exact
class. That means that java.util.Date won't work when the subclass
actually used is java.sql.Timestamp. Problem is that I need to display
just the date at some times, and allow people to see the full timestamp
at others (depending on the context). For example, on the main page
where I show a record the dates alone are fine, but on the page where I
display the audit history I need the full date.
So, how do I accomplish what I'm after without overcomplicating my
pages? Are converters set per page? That may be good enough for now.
Also, is there any real reason why the standard converters don't allow
you to specify a style without subclassing?
-Original Message-
From: Loritsch, Berin C. [mailto:berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the
application?
It may seem rather basic, but I'm looking for a reasonably simple way to
globally set how the application displays dates. On rails, it was as
simple as setting that information in the l10n/i18n resource files.
I've been googling and trying to find the answer in the Wicket in
Action book, but it doesn't seem like it's something anyone's cared to
post the answer to.
At first I thought it was setting up a converter registered with the
java.util.Date class. The instructions on the Wiki provide answers on
how to do that for wicket 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3. I attempted the 1.3
solution, and my dates are not changed. Here's what I have:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator converterLocator = new ConverterLocator();
converterLocator.set(Date.class, new DateConverter() {
private static final long serialVersionUID =
194715223274764825L;
@Override
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale) {
return new SimpleDateFormat(-MM-dd);
}
});
return converterLocator;
}
The date still is displayed like: 11/12/09 12:58 PM
Am I missing something? Even more specifically, I would like to have
three styles I can switch between: date only, time only, and date and
time. I'm trying not to repeat myself if I can help it. I'd like to
default to date only and specify time or date/time when needed. I
can't seem to get the system to recognize my date only solution.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the application?
I think your answer got lost somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Angenieux [mailto:aangeni...@clinigrid.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:06 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the
application?
--
Antoine Angénieux
Associé
Clinigrid
5, avenue Mozart
75016 Paris, France
+336 60 21 09 18
aangeni...@clinigrid.com
Le 1 déc. 2009 à 18:57, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-
ais.com a écrit :
It appears that the newConverterLocator() route is about right, but I
have a slight issue between the Hibernate binding and what I want to
happen. In order for the converter to work, it looks for the exact
class. That means that java.util.Date won't work when the subclass
actually used is java.sql.Timestamp. Problem is that I need to
display
just the date at some times, and allow people to see the full
timestamp
at others (depending on the context). For example, on the main page
where I show a record the dates alone are fine, but on the page
where I
display the audit history I need the full date.
So, how do I accomplish what I'm after without overcomplicating my
pages? Are converters set per page? That may be good enough for now.
Also, is there any real reason why the standard converters don't allow
you to specify a style without subclassing?
-Original Message-
From: Loritsch, Berin C. [mailto:berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the
application?
It may seem rather basic, but I'm looking for a reasonably simple
way to
globally set how the application displays dates. On rails, it was as
simple as setting that information in the l10n/i18n resource files.
I've been googling and trying to find the answer in the Wicket in
Action book, but it doesn't seem like it's something anyone's cared
to
post the answer to.
At first I thought it was setting up a converter registered with the
java.util.Date class. The instructions on the Wiki provide answers on
how to do that for wicket 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3. I attempted the 1.3
solution, and my dates are not changed. Here's what I have:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator converterLocator = new ConverterLocator();
converterLocator.set(Date.class, new DateConverter() {
private static final long serialVersionUID =
194715223274764825L;
@Override
public DateFormat getDateFormat(Locale locale) {
return new SimpleDateFormat(-MM-dd);
}
});
return converterLocator;
}
The date still is displayed like: 11/12/09 12:58 PM
Am I missing something? Even more specifically, I would like to have
three styles I can switch between: date only, time only, and date and
time. I'm trying not to repeat myself if I can help it. I'd like to
default to date only and specify time or date/time when needed. I
can't seem to get the system to recognize my date only solution.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: onclick auto-added to script tags?
Using Wicket 1.4.3. Since things are working right now without the wicket:link/ tag, I'm going to leave it like that. -Original Message- From: bgooren [mailto:b...@iswd.nl] Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:26 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: onclick auto-added to script tags? Well, I don't use Spring integration in my projects, so I cannot tell you for sure if that could be the reason for this. I do however find it unlikely that Spring integration would alter html tags. What you could try is step through the rendering process with a debugger and see what's happening with the wicket:link/ tag. See AutoLinkResolver and WicketLinkTagHandler. Which version of Wicket are you running? Loritsch, Berin C. wrote: I'm integrated with Spring/Hibernate, could this be a side effect from the SpringInvocationHandler? I've not added anything of the sort directly (i.e. I have not created any ComponentInstantiationListeners myself). I've removed the wicket:link/ blocks for now in my header and things are working as expected. That rules out a browser plugin being at fault. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/onclick-auto-added-to-%3Cscript%3E-tags--tp2650427 4p26526076.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: onclick auto-added to script tags?
I'm integrated with Spring/Hibernate, could this be a side effect from the SpringInvocationHandler? I've not added anything of the sort directly (i.e. I have not created any ComponentInstantiationListeners myself). I've removed the wicket:link/ blocks for now in my header and things are working as expected. That rules out a browser plugin being at fault. -Original Message- From: bgooren [mailto:b...@iswd.nl] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 7:07 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: onclick auto-added to script tags? I'm using wicket:link/ blocks around javascript references as well and have never observed the behavior you describe. Do you auto-add a behavior to components which adds the onclick value? It's being added from somewhere, and is not default Wicket behavior. So it's either a browser plugin or an IBehavior added from, say, a ComponentInstantiationListener. Bas Loritsch, Berin C. wrote: I have my HTML header links for CSS and JavaScript surrounded in a wicket:link/ block so that it can resolve the context name, etc. Problem is that it causes unexpected and peculiar behavior: script type=text/javascript src=script/prototype.js/script Becomes script type=text/javascript src=script/prototype.js onclick=window.location.href='script/prototype.js';return false;/script Which is invalid markup, much less causing errors for me. How do I get rid of the onclick attribute? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/onclick-auto-added-to-%3Cscript%3E-tags--tp2650427 4p26511542.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
SessionListeners and Wicket?
I have a requirement to have a queue of items that need work with a pool of people working on them. I need to lock the record while someone is working on it. Once the item is processed it will be removed permanently from the list. Occasionally users open an item and then close it. That part I've got taken care of. I also have the part taken care of where a user manually logs out and the system releases any locks the user has. However, that doesn't catch the problem where users sessions time out. My best guess is that I need to add a SessionListener to the web.xml to handle this corner case. So I have two questions: * Can I use the IMSSession.get() from my SessionListener and get the one for the running application? * Is there a more elegant Wicket way of doing the same thing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Can @SpringBeans be optional?
Understood. Just introducing it as a possibility. -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:40 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Can @SpringBeans be optional? That's not a dependency injection thing. It's a design pattern called the Null Object pattern. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: Technically speaking from the Dependency Injection koolaid doctrine, the best way to solve the problem is to have a null implementation of your service that does nothing. The code you are writing doesn't have to have complex if/else logic as it's able to assume the service is always there. The null implementation is wired in for the app that doesn't use it. Alternatively, create your accessor (getRememberMeService()) in the session that will access the ApplicationContext itself. It will determine if the bean exists or not and return the appropriate value. Since it allows for lazy initialization, it also addresses any issues from the ApplicationContext not being set up in time during unit testing. -Original Message- From: Anthony DePalma [mailto:fatef...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:47 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Can @SpringBeans be optional? Often with spring I give some of my services extra features if they are configured in the xml for it, but otherwise if they are null they are simply ignored. I'm running into an issue with my websession, that one of my apps can use the RememberMeService but another cannot. However, I'd like to have one abstractwebsession they can share, but unfortunately I'll get an exception when starting the app without the rememberMeService defined in the xml. It wouldn't make sense to define one to satisfy the error. The only solution I had so far was to inject it into the application class, where i can do so without @springbeans and thus a service can be null, but is there any way I can configure springbeans to not throw an error on startup for optional services? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Adding markup to ListView containing tag?
Thank you, that worked.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:03 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding markup to ListView containing tag?
div id=triage-items
div id=triage-1 wicket:id=listviewfancy markup here/div
/div
class mypage extends webpage implements iheadercontributor {
public mypage() {
add(new listview(listview,...) {
protected item newitem(string id, int idx) {
return new item(id, idx) {
protected oncomponenttag(tag) { tag.put(class,fancyitem); }
};
});
}
renderhead(resp) {
resp.renderondomreadyjavascript($(.fancyitem.whatever_jquery_thing_you_want);
}
}
-igor
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Loritsch, Berin C.
berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote:
What I would like is to be able to have markup like this:
div id=triage-items
div id=triage-1fancy markup here/div
div id=triage-2fancy markup here/div
/div
Along with this, to provide javascript effects on hover/focus for the
individual items in the list. The problem is that I can't do this with
Wicket easily. I basically get markup like this:
divfancy markup here/div
divfancy markup here/div
I attempted to create a panel with a panel with the ListView to do what
I wanted, but it ended up looking like this:
divdivfancy markup here/div/div
divdivfancy markup here/div/div
Which is no-where near what I want. I'm trying to work with the Wicket
in Action book and the short section on repeating lists doesn't provide
enough to help me get it working. All my attempts at writing the id
attribute using the examples in the book don't work (no ID is ever
created).
Can anyone help my sanity? While I do care about the markup, it's less
important than the end target of adding the AJAX effects to the items in
the list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
onclick auto-added to script tags?
I have my HTML header links for CSS and JavaScript surrounded in a wicket:link/ block so that it can resolve the context name, etc. Problem is that it causes unexpected and peculiar behavior: script type=text/javascript src=script/prototype.js/script Becomes script type=text/javascript src=script/prototype.js onclick=window.location.href='script/prototype.js';return false;/script Which is invalid markup, much less causing errors for me. How do I get rid of the onclick attribute? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Can @SpringBeans be optional?
Technically speaking from the Dependency Injection koolaid doctrine, the best way to solve the problem is to have a null implementation of your service that does nothing. The code you are writing doesn't have to have complex if/else logic as it's able to assume the service is always there. The null implementation is wired in for the app that doesn't use it. Alternatively, create your accessor (getRememberMeService()) in the session that will access the ApplicationContext itself. It will determine if the bean exists or not and return the appropriate value. Since it allows for lazy initialization, it also addresses any issues from the ApplicationContext not being set up in time during unit testing. -Original Message- From: Anthony DePalma [mailto:fatef...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:47 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Can @SpringBeans be optional? Often with spring I give some of my services extra features if they are configured in the xml for it, but otherwise if they are null they are simply ignored. I'm running into an issue with my websession, that one of my apps can use the RememberMeService but another cannot. However, I'd like to have one abstractwebsession they can share, but unfortunately I'll get an exception when starting the app without the rememberMeService defined in the xml. It wouldn't make sense to define one to satisfy the error. The only solution I had so far was to inject it into the application class, where i can do so without @springbeans and thus a service can be null, but is there any way I can configure springbeans to not throw an error on startup for optional services? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Adding markup to ListView containing tag?
What I would like is to be able to have markup like this: div id=triage-items div id=triage-1fancy markup here/div div id=triage-2fancy markup here/div /div Along with this, to provide javascript effects on hover/focus for the individual items in the list. The problem is that I can't do this with Wicket easily. I basically get markup like this: divfancy markup here/div divfancy markup here/div I attempted to create a panel with a panel with the ListView to do what I wanted, but it ended up looking like this: divdivfancy markup here/div/div divdivfancy markup here/div/div Which is no-where near what I want. I'm trying to work with the Wicket in Action book and the short section on repeating lists doesn't provide enough to help me get it working. All my attempts at writing the id attribute using the examples in the book don't work (no ID is ever created). Can anyone help my sanity? While I do care about the markup, it's less important than the end target of adding the AJAX effects to the items in the list. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Resolving image locations
I'm using the Wicket Image object, and I'm having a hard time ensuring that it resolves properly. I have a base class to set up the UI template for the site, including the logo image. I added a new page in a child package, and as a result the Image declared in the base class is resolving relative to the new class. This is counter-intuitive, and violates the expectations of object oriented programming. Here is the basic situation: package.SiteTemplate Declares Image(Logo) package.images.Logo --- Contains the image package.subsystem.NewPage - Uses logo declared in SiteTemplate, But browser can't find it What I want to do is tell Wicket to always provide one path for the Logo image, so I don't have to duplicate the logo in several packages. I attempted to hardcode the path in plain HTML, but that URL broke as soon as the IDE put the app in a context. I'd like Wicket to take care of the base path, but not treat it like a resource that needs to be internationalized. How do I do that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Resolving image locations
Never mind. The problem was using Image instead of ContextImage. I guess that's the danger of relying on type-ahead to suggest the right thing. -Original Message- From: Loritsch, Berin C. [mailto:berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:23 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Resolving image locations I'm using the Wicket Image object, and I'm having a hard time ensuring that it resolves properly. I have a base class to set up the UI template for the site, including the logo image. I added a new page in a child package, and as a result the Image declared in the base class is resolving relative to the new class. This is counter-intuitive, and violates the expectations of object oriented programming. Here is the basic situation: package.SiteTemplate Declares Image(Logo) package.images.Logo --- Contains the image package.subsystem.NewPage - Uses logo declared in SiteTemplate, But browser can't find it What I want to do is tell Wicket to always provide one path for the Logo image, so I don't have to duplicate the logo in several packages. I attempted to hardcode the path in plain HTML, but that URL broke as soon as the IDE put the app in a context. I'd like Wicket to take care of the base path, but not treat it like a resource that needs to be internationalized. How do I do that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Generating standards compliant responses
I've set up in my SiteTemplate base class a call to set the content type
for the response, however it is not making it to the browser. Any
ideas? When I inspect the request headers and run the site validator
against my page the server content type is set to text/html even
though I've told it otherwise. What am I missing here? If it helps, it
is hosted in Tomcat 6. I need the Content-Type HTTP response header
to return application/xhtml+xml
public class SiteTemplate extends WebPage {
//
public void onBeforeRender() {
super.getResponse().setContentType(application/xhtml+xml; utf-8);
super.getResponse().setCharacterEncoding(utf-8);
user = IMSSession.get().getUser();
if (null == user ! (this instanceof LoginPage)) {
this.redirectToInterceptPage(new
LoginPage(null));
}
if (get(content) == null) {
BookmarkablePageLinkString homeLink = new
BookmarkablePageLinkString(home,
IMSApplication.get().getHomePage());
homeLink.add(new ContextImage(logo,
images/logo.png));
add(homeLink);
add(newUserInfo(userinfo));
add(newContentPanel(content));
add(newUserPanel(userbar));
}
super.onBeforeRender();
}
// define the newUserInfo, newContentPanel, and newUserPanel
abstract methods
}
RE: Generating standards compliant responses
I just found this out. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:44 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Generating standards compliant responses
Try setting it in configureresponse()
-igor
On Friday, November 20, 2009, Loritsch, Berin C.
berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote:
I've set up in my SiteTemplate base class a call to set the content type
for the response, however it is not making it to the browser. Any
ideas? When I inspect the request headers and run the site validator
against my page the server content type is set to text/html even
though I've told it otherwise. What am I missing here? If it helps, it
is hosted in Tomcat 6. I need the Content-Type HTTP response header
to return application/xhtml+xml
public class SiteTemplate extends WebPage {
//
public void onBeforeRender() {
super.getResponse().setContentType(application/xhtml+xml; utf-8);
super.getResponse().setCharacterEncoding(utf-8);
user = IMSSession.get().getUser();
if (null == user ! (this instanceof LoginPage)) {
this.redirectToInterceptPage(new
LoginPage(null));
}
if (get(content) == null) {
BookmarkablePageLinkString homeLink = new
BookmarkablePageLinkString(home,
IMSApplication.get().getHomePage());
homeLink.add(new ContextImage(logo,
images/logo.png));
add(homeLink);
add(newUserInfo(userinfo));
add(newContentPanel(content));
add(newUserPanel(userbar));
}
super.onBeforeRender();
}
// define the newUserInfo, newContentPanel, and newUserPanel
abstract methods
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Validating markup on non bookmarkable pages?
I'm using the TotalValidator plugin combined with a local basic validator installation. It's a great tool to keep me honest with the accessibility and standards compliant code. However certain pages that aren't linked with a BookmarkableLink can't be validated with the tool. I end up getting an error like the following: Nov 20, 2009 3:46:43 PM com.totalvalidator.Validator main SEVERE: Validation Failed com.totalvalidator.exceptions.ValidationException: Error retrieving page: http://localhost:8010/incidents/?wicket:interface=:1 : 404 Not Found at com.totalvalidator.utils.FileUtils.getReader(Unknown Source) at com.totalvalidator.Validator.validate(Unknown Source) at com.totalvalidator.Validator.main(Unknown Source) The odd thing is that if I put the same exact URL in my browser the page renders perfectly fine. My guess is that because the tool doesn't have the JSESSIONID cookie and/or has a different browser type that Wicket expires the page. Is that correct? If so, is there any way to work around it? If I'm using the redirectToInterceptPage() to get to a login page, is there a way I can make it bookmarkable? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: wicket + jdbc template app
DBCP and C3P0 are implementations of the pooled DataSource interface, so all you have to do is bind them to JNDI. Tomcat and other Servlet container vendors have instructions on how to do this. Inside your code, you access it through the JNDI API which looks up the pooled datasource. Do be sure to close anything you open, which includes resultsets, statements, and connections. Put the close code in finally statements to ensure that you don't fill up your pool with open resources. Open ResultSets also have matching resources on your database server, so you can introduce scalability problems if you aren't careful. -Original Message- From: Clint Checketts [mailto:checke...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:35 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicket + jdbc template app My Wicket app I maintain only uses the JdbcTemplate class from Spring. We don't use any hibernate or other ORM framework. I don't have any code I can give, but I can answer any questions. How far have you gotten? -Clint On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote: Are you saying you don't want to use Spring at all? But, you do want to use DBCP or C3P0? On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Dudko ivan.du...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, guys! I am still could not implement wicket application without any persistence framework and also spring-jdbc. I want to use only connection pooling with dbcp or c3p0. May you provide example for this kind of app. Thank you for answer! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts
OK. I've got it working again. The HibernateSession was set up in a hibernate Servlet filter. I found the minimum necessary lines to get the system working using my session factory configured in Spring. For the interested parties, here they are: SessionFactory factory = (SessionFactory) getSpringContext().getBean(sessionFactory); Session session = SessionFactoryUtils.getSession(factory, true); session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.AUTO); TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(factory, new SessionHolder(session)); I have them set up just after I configured the Spring container. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. -Original Message- From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:eelco.hillen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:06 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts So in typical web applications, people would install a session filter (like https://www.hibernate.org/43.html), which would open a session at the start of a request, and close it afterwards. You probably need to find an alternative for that filter in your test code. Eelco On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: Hmm, OK attachments are stripped here. Having gone back up through the stack trace, WicketTester extends BaseWicketTester which then extends MockWebApplication. Essentially MockWebApplication has the base implementations for setting up the WebRequestCycle. The @SpringBean is having an effect, because my exception is a HibernateException and not a NullPointerException. I think it has something to do with how the tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager=txManager / interacts with the WicketTester that is unclear to me. The thing that has changed is that while I had that declaration, I introduced using the @Transactional attributes on some of my Hibernate objects. Spring is giving me a proxied class that is supposed to take care of the hibernate sessions and transactions for me. It's having a hard time in the JUnit environment. I'm using the following TransactionManager: bean id=txManager class=org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager property name=sessionFactory ref=sessionFactory / /bean -Original Message- From: Loritsch, Berin C. [mailto:berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:15 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts I've got the part that injects a Spring WebApplicationContext into the WicketTester already (Source attached). I should be using the application class, if I'm not then something has changed unbeknownst to me. Is there any place it would swap out what I told it to use for what it decided on its own to use? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:05 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts i see you are using MockWebApplication in your tests. this application does not install the SpringComponentInjector and so @SpringBean has no effect. you should either give wickettester an instance of your actual application class, or create a mock one that installs springcomponentinjector. -igor On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: application.xml I initially had a setup that worked with both a Web context and a JUnit context. The problem was the amount of hand coding and adjusting of the Spring context the approach needed. I finally got the Spring's transaction interceptor working with the auto-wiring (the key is using an interface). So now my problem is that while I've saved myself the headache of making changes to a bunch of files every time I add a new service, my unit tests are now failing. I've traced the failure to a specific class that is decorated with the InjectorHolder--although I believe that is merely because it is the first component that does any Hibernate requests. I'll include the stacktrace at the bottom of the message. I had to remove the line that specified that sessions would be thread bound in Hibernate to take advantage of the Spring managed transactions, and adding that configuration item back in makes no difference for the tests. I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple, but all my Googling is turning up dead ends. Any help out there? org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = content]] at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContain er .java:1739) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854
RE: Wicket + Spring + Hibernate - Wicket-In-Action
I'm not sure the purpose of the interceptor, but until you have a need to extend and use it, you can use the org.hibernate.EmptyInterceptor class instead of creating your own. I have had no problems with using that class. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Schneller [mailto:jeffrey.schnel...@envisa.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 12:38 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Wicket + Spring + Hibernate - Wicket-In-Action At the link[1] it describes how to configure wicket to use Spring and Hibernate. In the applicationContext.xml file there is reference to a n interceptor bean. What is this interceptor bean? What is the definition of this bean? Everything else seems to make sense. Also how would one move the configuration of the jdbc connection to code? It is desirable to db connection information reside at the server level so when deploying code from dev to stage to production, you do not need change or replace a file. The configuration is at the server level [in the server context] and it is pulled from there. Thanks. [1] http://wicketinaction.com/2009/06/wicketspringhibernate-configuration/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts
application.xml I initially had a setup that worked with both a Web context and a JUnit context. The problem was the amount of hand coding and adjusting of the Spring context the approach needed. I finally got the Spring's transaction interceptor working with the auto-wiring (the key is using an interface). So now my problem is that while I've saved myself the headache of making changes to a bunch of files every time I add a new service, my unit tests are now failing. I've traced the failure to a specific class that is decorated with the InjectorHolder--although I believe that is merely because it is the first component that does any Hibernate requests. I'll include the stacktrace at the bottom of the message. I had to remove the line that specified that sessions would be thread bound in Hibernate to take advantage of the Spring managed transactions, and adding that configuration item back in makes no difference for the tests. I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple, but all my Googling is turning up dead ends. Any help out there? org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = content]] at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer .java:1739) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer .java:1727) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onBeforeRender(Page.java:1501) at com.gdais.incidents.view.SiteTemplate.onBeforeRender(SiteTemplate.java:3 3) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2223) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2260) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:893) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget .respond(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(Abstract RequestCycleProcessor.java:105) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java :1258) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:594) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(M ockWebApplication.java:478) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(M ockWebApplication.java:390) at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.startPage(BaseWicketTeste r.java:301) at com.gdais.incidents.view.TestTriagePanel.assertTriageNotAvailableFor(Tes tTriagePanel.java:33) at com.gdais.incidents.view.TestTriagePanel.testTriagePanelNotForAdministra tor(TestTriagePanel.java:27) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav a:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor Impl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:230) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:225) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(JUn it3TestReference.java:130) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.ja va:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTe stRunner.java:460) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTe stRunner.java:673) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRun ner.java:386) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRu nner.java:196) Caused by: org.hibernate.HibernateException: No Hibernate Session bound to thread, and configuration does not allow creation of non-transactional one here at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SpringSessionContext.currentSession(S
RE: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts
I've got the part that injects a Spring WebApplicationContext into the WicketTester already (Source attached). I should be using the application class, if I'm not then something has changed unbeknownst to me. Is there any place it would swap out what I told it to use for what it decided on its own to use? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:05 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts i see you are using MockWebApplication in your tests. this application does not install the SpringComponentInjector and so @SpringBean has no effect. you should either give wickettester an instance of your actual application class, or create a mock one that installs springcomponentinjector. -igor On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: application.xml I initially had a setup that worked with both a Web context and a JUnit context. The problem was the amount of hand coding and adjusting of the Spring context the approach needed. I finally got the Spring's transaction interceptor working with the auto-wiring (the key is using an interface). So now my problem is that while I've saved myself the headache of making changes to a bunch of files every time I add a new service, my unit tests are now failing. I've traced the failure to a specific class that is decorated with the InjectorHolder--although I believe that is merely because it is the first component that does any Hibernate requests. I'll include the stacktrace at the bottom of the message. I had to remove the line that specified that sessions would be thread bound in Hibernate to take advantage of the Spring managed transactions, and adding that configuration item back in makes no difference for the tests. I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple, but all my Googling is turning up dead ends. Any help out there? org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = content]] at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer .java:1739) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContainer .java:1727) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onBeforeRender(Page.java:1501) at com.gdais.incidents.view.SiteTemplate.onBeforeRender(SiteTemplate.java:3 3) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2223) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2260) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:893) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget .respond(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(Abstract RequestCycleProcessor.java:105) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java :1258) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:594) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(M ockWebApplication.java:478) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.processRequestCycle(M ockWebApplication.java:390) at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.startPage(BaseWicketTeste r.java:301) at com.gdais.incidents.view.TestTriagePanel.assertTriageNotAvailableFor(Tes tTriagePanel.java:33) at com.gdais.incidents.view.TestTriagePanel.testTriagePanelNotForAdministra tor(TestTriagePanel.java:27) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav a:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor Impl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120
RE: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts
Hmm, OK attachments are stripped here. Having gone back up through the stack trace, WicketTester extends BaseWicketTester which then extends MockWebApplication. Essentially MockWebApplication has the base implementations for setting up the WebRequestCycle. The @SpringBean is having an effect, because my exception is a HibernateException and not a NullPointerException. I think it has something to do with how the tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager=txManager / interacts with the WicketTester that is unclear to me. The thing that has changed is that while I had that declaration, I introduced using the @Transactional attributes on some of my Hibernate objects. Spring is giving me a proxied class that is supposed to take care of the hibernate sessions and transactions for me. It's having a hard time in the JUnit environment. I'm using the following TransactionManager: bean id=txManager class=org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager property name=sessionFactory ref=sessionFactory / /bean -Original Message- From: Loritsch, Berin C. [mailto:berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:15 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts I've got the part that injects a Spring WebApplicationContext into the WicketTester already (Source attached). I should be using the application class, if I'm not then something has changed unbeknownst to me. Is there any place it would swap out what I told it to use for what it decided on its own to use? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:05 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Spring/Wicket/Hibernate testing driving me banana nuts i see you are using MockWebApplication in your tests. this application does not install the SpringComponentInjector and so @SpringBean has no effect. you should either give wickettester an instance of your actual application class, or create a mock one that installs springcomponentinjector. -igor On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: application.xml I initially had a setup that worked with both a Web context and a JUnit context. The problem was the amount of hand coding and adjusting of the Spring context the approach needed. I finally got the Spring's transaction interceptor working with the auto-wiring (the key is using an interface). So now my problem is that while I've saved myself the headache of making changes to a bunch of files every time I add a new service, my unit tests are now failing. I've traced the failure to a specific class that is decorated with the InjectorHolder--although I believe that is merely because it is the first component that does any Hibernate requests. I'll include the stacktrace at the bottom of the message. I had to remove the line that specified that sessions would be thread bound in Hibernate to take advantage of the Spring managed transactions, and adding that configuration item back in makes no difference for the tests. I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple, but all my Googling is turning up dead ends. Any help out there? org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Error attaching this container for rendering: [MarkupContainer [Component id = content]] at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContain er .java:1739) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onBeforeRenderChildren(MarkupContain er .java:1727) at org.apache.wicket.Component.onBeforeRender(Component.java:3854) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onBeforeRender(Page.java:1501) at com.gdais.incidents.view.SiteTemplate.onBeforeRender(SiteTemplate.java :3 3) at org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender(Component.java:1061) at org.apache.wicket.Component.beforeRender(Component.java:1095) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2223) at org.apache.wicket.Component.prepareForRender(Component.java:2260) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:893) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarg et .respond(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:262) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(Abstra ct RequestCycleProcessor.java:105) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.ja va :1258) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428
Wicket Spring API docs?
Where can I find the wicket-spring module API docs? It's not clear to me from the website.
RE: Wicket Spring API docs?
I did, but that doesn't help me with knowing what classes are available. For example, I had issues with using the WicketTester to test my Wicket/Spring based app. I finally was able to create my own SpringWicketTester class that would load up the SpringWebApplicationContext that is needed for my app to run. However, I had no way of telling if that was duplicate work. If anyone is interested, I can donate the SpringWicketTester class. It should belong to the wicket-spring subproject. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:16 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket Spring API docs? dont you use attach sources in your IDE? -igor On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: Where can I find the wicket-spring module API docs? It's not clear to me from the website. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Wicket Spring API docs?
I hate to be a smart-butt, but if I'm not familiar with how things are named yet search is not very helpful. Javadocs have their place, and are most useful when you are familiarizing yourself with an unfamiliar API. I've now run the mvn target to get the javadocs, which is helpful. Is there any interest in the SpringWicketTester class I put together? I'm sure there is more than one person who has hit this problem, and all the online instructions I've found are for Wicket 1.3 or 1.2. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:42 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket Spring API docs? your IDE is much better at browsing and searching for classes then a javadoc online :) -igor On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: I did, but that doesn't help me with knowing what classes are available. For example, I had issues with using the WicketTester to test my Wicket/Spring based app. I finally was able to create my own SpringWicketTester class that would load up the SpringWebApplicationContext that is needed for my app to run. However, I had no way of telling if that was duplicate work. If anyone is interested, I can donate the SpringWicketTester class. It should belong to the wicket-spring subproject. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:16 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket Spring API docs? dont you use attach sources in your IDE? -igor On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd-ais.com wrote: Where can I find the wicket-spring module API docs? It's not clear to me from the website. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Wicket Spring API docs?
It's fairly small. I can include it in an email. If I throw it on the wiki where would be the best place? -Original Message- From: Pierre Goupil [mailto:goupilpie...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:02 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket Spring API docs? Hello, I'd be glad to see it. Is there any place where it would fit? Maybe on the Wicket wiki? Regards, Pierre
SpringWicketTester code (tested with Wicket 1.4 and spring-wicket)
import javax.servlet.ServletContext;
import org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockServletContext;
import org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication;
import org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester;
import org.springframework.web.context.WebApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.web.context.support.XmlWebApplicationContext;
/**
* Spring enabled WicketTester allows a user to test applications that
have
* been wired using the SpringComponentInjector. This subclass of the
* WicketTester sets up the spring web context, which is normally set up
by
* the org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener class.
*/
public class SpringWicketTester extends WicketTester {
/**
* The Spring web application context
*/
private XmlWebApplicationContext spring;
/**
* Instantiate the WicketTester with your application and a set
of URLs
* to find the Spring XML configuration files. Ex:
*
* pre
* new SpringWicketTester(new MyApp(),
classpath:application.xml,
*
classpath:application-test.xml);
* /pre
*
* @param app Your Wicket web application
* @param springConfigURLs The set of URLs for the
configuration files.
*/
public SpringWicketTester(WebApplication app, String...
springConfigURLs) {
this(app, null, springConfigURLs);
}
/**
* Instantiate the WicketTester with your application and a set
of URLs
* to find the Spring XML configuration files. Ex:
*
* pre
* new SpringWicketTester(new MyApp(), myapp,
*
classpath:application.xml,
*
classpath:application-test.xml);
* /pre
*
* @param app Your Wicket web application
* @param context The base url for the application
* @param springConfigURLs The set of URLs for the
configuration files.
*/
public SpringWicketTester(WebApplication app, String context,
String... springConfigURLs) {
super(app, context);
reconfigure(springConfigURLs);
}
/**
* Reconfigure the tester with new spring configuration files.
This method
* also calls the Spring coderefresh/code method to force
the files to
* load.
*
* @param springConfigURLs The set of URLs for the
configuration files.
*/
public void reconfigure(String... springConfigURLs) {
getSpringContext().setConfigLocations(springConfigURLs);
getSpringContext().refresh();
}
/**
* Create the new ServletContext that will be used with this
test session.
* This method configures the spring web context to be included
in your
* Servlet context. It's the magic that makes everything happy.
*
* @param path the root context path for URLs
*
* @return a configured ServletContext
*/
@Override
public ServletContext newServletContext(final String path) {
ServletContext context = new
MockServletContext(getApplication(), path);
getSpringContext().setServletContext(context);
context.setAttribute(WebApplicationContext.ROOT_WEB_APPLICATION_CONTEXT_
ATTRIBUTE, spring);
return context;
}
/**
* Lazy loader for the creating the SpringContext. Required to
work around
* the initialization in the constructor.
*
* @return the single web application context for this tester
*/
private XmlWebApplicationContext getSpringContext() {
if(null == spring) {
spring = new XmlWebApplicationContext();
}
return spring;
}
}
