Re: constructing page multiple times per request
I did, I dont see anything specific about this java.lang.RuntimeException: test at com.myapp.Page1.initialize(Page1.java:80) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:48) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:42) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:174) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:66) at org.apache.wicket.DefaultMapperContext.newPageInstance(DefaultMapperContext.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.resolvePageInstance(PageProvider.java:278) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.getPageInstance(PageProvider.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.PageRenderer.getPage(PageRenderer.java:78) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.renderPage(WebPageRenderer.java:94) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.respond(WebPageRenderer.java:244) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.RenderPageRequestHandler.respond(RenderPageRequestHandler.java:165) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:830) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.execute(RequestHandlerStack.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.execute(RequestCycle.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:281) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:188) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:245) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1307) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:453) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1072) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:382) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1006) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:365) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:485) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:926) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:988) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:635) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:235) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AsyncHttpConnection.handle(AsyncHttpConnection.java:82) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.handle(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:628) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint$1.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:52) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:608) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) and it is always 3 times ;/ pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 09:19, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Just put a breakpoint in your constructor and see what are the stacktraces. On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:27 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I try to understand why wicket (in 6th version) is constructing my page always 3 times per every request. it is page constructor is called 3 times always I navigate to page. I configured it as getResourceSettings().setFileCleaner(null); getPageSettings().setVersionPagesByDefault(false); getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy
Re: constructing page multiple times per request
I have something like this in logs, I will try remove it pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 20:12, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.comwrote: Wasn't there some problem with empty images (img src= ) and IE reloading the page? At least I remember some old threads on this topic. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: I did, I dont see anything specific about this java.lang.RuntimeException: test at com.myapp.Page1.initialize(Page1.java:80) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:48) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:42) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:174) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:66) at org.apache.wicket.DefaultMapperContext.newPageInstance(DefaultMapperContext.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.resolvePageInstance(PageProvider.java:278) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.getPageInstance(PageProvider.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.PageRenderer.getPage(PageRenderer.java:78) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.renderPage(WebPageRenderer.java:94) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.respond(WebPageRenderer.java:244) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.RenderPageRequestHandler.respond(RenderPageRequestHandler.java:165) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:830) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.execute(RequestHandlerStack.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.execute(RequestCycle.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:281) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:188) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:245) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1307) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:453) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1072) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:382) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1006) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:365) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:485) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:926) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:988) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:635) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:235) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AsyncHttpConnection.handle(AsyncHttpConnection.java:82) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.handle(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:628) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint$1.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:52) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:608) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722
Re: constructing page multiple times per request
yep that was it, why this happens? thanks ernesto, it is not only on IE ;] firefox also pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 20:36, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: I have something like this in logs, I will try remove it pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 20:12, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.comwrote: Wasn't there some problem with empty images (img src= ) and IE reloading the page? At least I remember some old threads on this topic. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: I did, I dont see anything specific about this java.lang.RuntimeException: test at com.myapp.Page1.initialize(Page1.java:80) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:48) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:42) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:174) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:66) at org.apache.wicket.DefaultMapperContext.newPageInstance(DefaultMapperContext.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.resolvePageInstance(PageProvider.java:278) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.getPageInstance(PageProvider.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.PageRenderer.getPage(PageRenderer.java:78) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.renderPage(WebPageRenderer.java:94) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.respond(WebPageRenderer.java:244) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.RenderPageRequestHandler.respond(RenderPageRequestHandler.java:165) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:830) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.execute(RequestHandlerStack.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.execute(RequestCycle.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:281) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:188) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:245) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1307) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:453) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1072) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:382) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1006) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:365) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:485) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:926) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(AbstractHttpConnection.java:988) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:635) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:235) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AsyncHttpConnection.handle(AsyncHttpConnection.java:82) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.handle(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:628) at org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint$1.run
Re: constructing page multiple times per request
ok, thanks anyway, indeed it was killing me for some time now ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 21:13, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:42 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: yep that was it, why this happens? To be honest I do not know the exact reason... I guess a second request is launched to retrieve missing empty image... Just googled for it and found this. http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2009/11/30/empty-image-src-can-destroy-your-site/ thanks ernesto, it is not only on IE ;] firefox also pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 20:36, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: I have something like this in logs, I will try remove it pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 January 2013 20:12, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Wasn't there some problem with empty images (img src= ) and IE reloading the page? At least I remember some old threads on this topic. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: I did, I dont see anything specific about this java.lang.RuntimeException: test at com.myapp.Page1.initialize(Page1.java:80) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:48) at com.myapp.Page1.init(Page1.java:42) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:174) at org.apache.wicket.session.DefaultPageFactory.newPage(DefaultPageFactory.java:66) at org.apache.wicket.DefaultMapperContext.newPageInstance(DefaultMapperContext.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.resolvePageInstance(PageProvider.java:278) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.PageProvider.getPageInstance(PageProvider.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.PageRenderer.getPage(PageRenderer.java:78) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.renderPage(WebPageRenderer.java:94) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.render.WebPageRenderer.respond(WebPageRenderer.java:244) at org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.RenderPageRequestHandler.respond(RenderPageRequestHandler.java:165) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:830) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.execute(RequestHandlerStack.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.execute(RequestCycle.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:210) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:281) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:188) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:245) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1307) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:453) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1072) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:382) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1006) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
huh, then something is wrong with my environment, im running it with jetty invoking simple mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
anyway there is nothing wrong to my code, in your opnion? I just have bad feeling about passing model from one page to another in constructor. on the other hand model are serialised into session so maybe it is a better idea to pass them around rather than object they are wrapping pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 18:13, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: huh, then something is wrong with my environment, im running it with jetty invoking simple mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
but why?? test it with mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 20:47, Thomas Götz t...@decoded.de wrote: I tested your quickstart from within the IDE by running Start.java. Models are meant to be passed around, so there's nothing wrong with it in general. And it's always (at least in 95% of cases I'd dare to say) preferable to passing Objects (beans). -Tom On 22.05.2012 at 18:55 kamiseq wrote: anyway there is nothing wrong to my code, in your opnion? I just have bad feeling about passing model from one page to another in constructor. on the other hand model are serialised into session so maybe it is a better idea to pass them around rather than object they are wrapping pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 18:13, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: huh, then something is wrong with my environment, im running it with jetty invoking simple mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
i checked it on other machine, and is working, I ve cleaned m2 repository and now it is working as well :/ I dont know what happened but it is weird that it showed on two separate application thanks for help, actually it is great it was only may problem ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 22:52, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: but why?? test it with mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 20:47, Thomas Götz t...@decoded.de wrote: I tested your quickstart from within the IDE by running Start.java. Models are meant to be passed around, so there's nothing wrong with it in general. And it's always (at least in 95% of cases I'd dare to say) preferable to passing Objects (beans). -Tom On 22.05.2012 at 18:55 kamiseq wrote: anyway there is nothing wrong to my code, in your opnion? I just have bad feeling about passing model from one page to another in constructor. on the other hand model are serialised into session so maybe it is a better idea to pass them around rather than object they are wrapping pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 22 May 2012 18:13, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: huh, then something is wrong with my environment, im running it with jetty invoking simple mvn clean install jetty:run pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
hej,
I have a strange error.
I have stateless page (A) with form on it. form contains email input.
inside form's onSelect handler I create page (B) and pass email to its
constructor.
Application nextPage = new
Application(getModelObject().getEmail());// form model object
setResponsePage(nextPage);
page B is also mounted so someone can access page by passing email as parameter.
super(parameters);
StringValue email = parameters.get(email);
if (email.isEmpty())
throw new RuntimeException(ups no email);
page B displays users data if available.
page B creates LoadableDetachableModel and uses email as id, I also
pass Injected service object by giuce to the model
page B has link to go to page C
add(new LinkVoid(accept)
{
@Override
public void onClick() {
SignIn signInPage = new SignIn(model); // model is created on
the begging of the constructor
setResponsePage(signInPage);
}
});
pages B and C are state-full.
now when I go from page A and pass page B object and then call the
link which creates page C object then I get page expired message.
BUT if I go directly to page B using mounted url and then I click on
link I am redirected to page C without a problem.
maybe I miss something obvious here but I cannot explain it why this
is happening.
there is no errors in log from wicket, the SignIn (C) page is created
as expected.
thanks for any hint.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
yes,
can I send it directly to you in case userlist rejects attachment?
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 21 May 2012 10:01, Thomas Götz t...@decoded.de wrote:
Could you provide a quickstart that demonstrates this behavior?
-Tom
On 21.05.2012 at 09:56 kamiseq wrote:
hej,
I have a strange error.
I have stateless page (A) with form on it. form contains email input.
inside form's onSelect handler I create page (B) and pass email to its
constructor.
Application nextPage = new
Application(getModelObject().getEmail());// form model object
setResponsePage(nextPage);
page B is also mounted so someone can access page by passing email as
parameter.
super(parameters);
StringValue email = parameters.get(email);
if (email.isEmpty())
throw new RuntimeException(ups no email);
page B displays users data if available.
page B creates LoadableDetachableModel and uses email as id, I also
pass Injected service object by giuce to the model
page B has link to go to page C
add(new LinkVoid(accept)
{
@Override
public void onClick() {
SignIn signInPage = new SignIn(model); // model is created on
the begging of the constructor
setResponsePage(signInPage);
}
});
pages B and C are state-full.
now when I go from page A and pass page B object and then call the
link which creates page C object then I get page expired message.
BUT if I go directly to page B using mounted url and then I click on
link I am redirected to page C without a problem.
maybe I miss something obvious here but I cannot explain it why this
is happening.
there is no errors in log from wicket, the SignIn (C) page is created
as expected.
thanks for any hint.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 setting response page with page object and session expired error
ok, yep right, give me some time so I try to recreate it from scratch pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 May 2012 16:48, Thomas Götz t...@decoded.de wrote: Either this or upload it somewhere and post the link here. -Tom On 21.05.2012 at 16:25 kamiseq wrote: yes, can I send it directly to you in case userlist rejects attachment? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 resources
thanks, it works.
ok so if jQuery is added always as wicket depends on it now, so what
is JQueryPluginResourceReference for??? I saw it in
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples-6.0.x/resourceaggregation/
and javadoc says it is Base class for JavaScript resources that are
JQuery plugins but in example HomePage.js is not a jQ plugin. more,
it will work if I reference js file using
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forUrl(scripts/Forms.js)); (as
you showed me) or using JS reference to get file from java package.
im just little confused
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 19 May 2012 13:42, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
hej,
I tried to look for this and I ve found some old topics but they were
related to older version of wicket than 6.
I m looking for 2 things
1] I would like to get validator message with all parameters. for
example lets take required message I can get it like this: new
StringResourceModel(Required, this, null).getString() but it will
return Field '${label}' is required. or its translated equivalent.
how can I set label parameter with actual value. maybe
StringRecourceModel is not the best choice. I tried to look how
validators do that but I think it is to much trouble.
public class Foo implements Serializable {String label;public String
getLabel() {return anyname;} }
new StringResourceModel(key,JsPage.this, new Model(new Foo())).toString()
or you can useinterpolator like mapvariableinterpolator
MapString,Stringmap=new HashMapString, String();
map.put(label,anyname);
MapVariableInterpolator.interpolate( getString(key), map);
I need this error message before form performs any validation so I can
reuse it in javascript validation. in other words if form component
has validator I would like to get its message and add it to my custom
js validation function.
2] I know that I should keep all my css and js next to java classes
and let wicket handle, and this work - I have no problem with it. but
sometimes it is more convenient to put those scripts inside webapp
directory. and again I ve found some article about it but I dont want
to use wro4j. what is the easiest way to reference any JS script from
webapp/scripts/ in wicket 6?? I started playing with requireJs.js and
it looks for scripts inside scripts directory
i started with code like this
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(new
JQueryPluginResourceReference(Application.class, Forms.js))); but of
course it is not working.
resourcereference is not required to access resources in webcontext
response.render(JavaScriptContentHeaderItem.forUrl(Forms.js));
maybe Im too tired or something but all I can find uses resources
inside java packages.
thanks for any hints
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
thank you,
regards,
Vineet Semwal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 resources
ok but when you use JQueryPluginResourceReference how then access
scripts form webapp directory, I tried something like
JQueryPluginResourceReference(null, scripts/Form) and
JQueryPluginResourceReference(myPageRef, scripts/Form) but no luck,
maybe I just overlooked something
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 19 May 2012 23:44, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
afaik wicket ajax depends on jquery and not whole wicket so jquery is
not always imported in your page automatically,it's imported
automatically when you your page has some wicket ajax functionality so
imo if your js file is using jquery then you should use
JQueryPluginResourceReference to import your js file
,JQueryPluginResourceReference will also add jquery on its own .
basically this approach prevents version conflicts .
btw HomePage.js is using jquery ..
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:23 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, it works.
ok so if jQuery is added always as wicket depends on it now, so what
is JQueryPluginResourceReference for??? I saw it in
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples-6.0.x/resourceaggregation/
and javadoc says it is Base class for JavaScript resources that are
JQuery plugins but in example HomePage.js is not a jQ plugin. more,
it will work if I reference js file using
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forUrl(scripts/Forms.js)); (as
you showed me) or using JS reference to get file from java package.
im just little confused
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 19 May 2012 13:42, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
hej,
I tried to look for this and I ve found some old topics but they were
related to older version of wicket than 6.
I m looking for 2 things
1] I would like to get validator message with all parameters. for
example lets take required message I can get it like this: new
StringResourceModel(Required, this, null).getString() but it will
return Field '${label}' is required. or its translated equivalent.
how can I set label parameter with actual value. maybe
StringRecourceModel is not the best choice. I tried to look how
validators do that but I think it is to much trouble.
public class Foo implements Serializable {String label;public String
getLabel() {return anyname;} }
new StringResourceModel(key,JsPage.this, new Model(new Foo())).toString()
or you can useinterpolator like mapvariableinterpolator
MapString,Stringmap=new HashMapString, String();
map.put(label,anyname);
MapVariableInterpolator.interpolate( getString(key), map);
I need this error message before form performs any validation so I can
reuse it in javascript validation. in other words if form component
has validator I would like to get its message and add it to my custom
js validation function.
2] I know that I should keep all my css and js next to java classes
and let wicket handle, and this work - I have no problem with it. but
sometimes it is more convenient to put those scripts inside webapp
directory. and again I ve found some article about it but I dont want
to use wro4j. what is the easiest way to reference any JS script from
webapp/scripts/ in wicket 6?? I started playing with requireJs.js and
it looks for scripts inside scripts directory
i started with code like this
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(new
JQueryPluginResourceReference(Application.class, Forms.js))); but of
course it is not working.
resourcereference is not required to access resources in webcontext
response.render(JavaScriptContentHeaderItem.forUrl(Forms.js));
maybe Im too tired or something but all I can find uses resources
inside java packages.
thanks for any hints
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
thank you,
regards,
Vineet Semwal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
thank you,
regards,
Vineet Semwal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
Re: wicket 6 resources
hym, I thought it is more flexible, anyway I can always add jquery manually. and yes good point that I need make sure that im using same version of jQ as wicket. thanks for explanation pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 resources
yep, I think I ve even seen a way to change jQ file somewhere in application settings. it was described somewhere in migration to 6.0 page again thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 20 May 2012 07:27, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote: you are welcome ..,to use same version of jquery in your case do response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(Application.get().getJavaScriptLibrarySettings().getJQueryReference())) On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:46 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hym, I thought it is more flexible, anyway I can always add jquery manually. and yes good point that I need make sure that im using same version of jQ as wicket. thanks for explanation pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- thank you, regards, Vineet Semwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 6 resources
hej,
I tried to look for this and I ve found some old topics but they were
related to older version of wicket than 6.
I m looking for 2 things
1] I would like to get validator message with all parameters. for
example lets take required message I can get it like this: new
StringResourceModel(Required, this, null).getString() but it will
return Field '${label}' is required. or its translated equivalent.
how can I set label parameter with actual value. maybe
StringRecourceModel is not the best choice. I tried to look how
validators do that but I think it is to much trouble.
I need this error message before form performs any validation so I can
reuse it in javascript validation. in other words if form component
has validator I would like to get its message and add it to my custom
js validation function.
2] I know that I should keep all my css and js next to java classes
and let wicket handle, and this work - I have no problem with it. but
sometimes it is more convenient to put those scripts inside webapp
directory. and again I ve found some article about it but I dont want
to use wro4j. what is the easiest way to reference any JS script from
webapp/scripts/ in wicket 6?? I started playing with requireJs.js and
it looks for scripts inside scripts directory
i started with code like this
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(new
JQueryPluginResourceReference(Application.class, Forms.js))); but of
course it is not working.
maybe Im too tired or something but all I can find uses resources
inside java packages.
thanks for any hints
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: VTD XML for wicket
too bad pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 17 May 2012 11:12, Kees van Dieren i...@squins.com wrote: Its licenced GPL so wicket cannot depend on it. Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Kees van Dieren Squins | IT, Honestly Oranjestraat 23 2983 HL Ridderkerk The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0)180 415559 Mobile: +31 (0)6 30413841 www.squins.com http://twitter.com/keesvandieren Chamber of commerce Rotterdam: 24435130 Boeken voor school en werk bestel je op studieboekencenter.nl 2012/5/17 kamiseq kami...@gmail.com anyway VDT-XML outperforms any existing SAXlike or DOM technologies. I just want to let you know. take care pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 17 May 2012 07:08, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: xml is parsed only the first time a page/panel is accessed. broken down into a collection of chunks optimized for wicket's consumption. and cached. -igor On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hej, have you ever consider using http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/ as xml parsing library?? I ve already successfully used this in quite big project and for sure it is worth checking as I suspect wicket spends some time parsing html on each request, right? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: VTD XML for wicket
anyway VDT-XML outperforms any existing SAXlike or DOM technologies. I just want to let you know. take care pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 17 May 2012 07:08, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: xml is parsed only the first time a page/panel is accessed. broken down into a collection of chunks optimized for wicket's consumption. and cached. -igor On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hej, have you ever consider using http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/ as xml parsing library?? I ve already successfully used this in quite big project and for sure it is worth checking as I suspect wicket spends some time parsing html on each request, right? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 global services
ok, thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 15 May 2012 08:43, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, See http://wicketinaction.com/2011/07/wicket-1-5-mounting-resources Instead of serving images you can serve whatever you need. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:19 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hej, I have few questions about how to do few things in wicket, right now I m focusing on 6th version. I would like to create global service that returns for example JSON or html. and given I have stateless page with components that supports AJAX I would like to point my JS components to this global service. I think it best to accomplish this with mounting 1) mount resource and then use getRequestCycle().urlFor(resourceReference, parameters); 2) if I have to return html maybe it is better to mount page I ve also found somewhere that I could implement custom renderers that could render simple html or jason or whatever text I need, but I cannot find anything about right now. what about adding custom RequestCycleListener, or something like that? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 dynamic form parts generated in JS
ok, great. this is what I thought so I dont want to reinvent things again, many thanks for quick replay pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 6 using external session
the other technology is WebObjects and it uses its own server, I have no idea if it can be easily ported to servlet container, anyway right now it is not using one (as far I can tell). Wicket stores only the last used page instance in the http session. One instance! And only if the page is stateful. With a custom IPageStore impl you can make this even 0, but then each Ajax request will load the page from the disk. maybe it is possible to make a hybrid implementation to store model data in shared session and everything else locally because only wicket will use it. where should I start digging. IPageStore is one anything else? what about rendering strategies - is this something I should worry about? thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Aggregating JavaScript
I was thinking about creating custom behaviour that will connect to other behaviour and render all scripts needed at the bottom of the page (If this is possible), I understand that headerContributior is not good choice as it will render scripts in head section and we want them at the bottom pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 27 April 2012 09:46, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I think there are two options: 1) use a IMarkupFilter that will extract the scripts from the markup and transform them to header contributions via ComponentTag#addBehavior() 2) wicket:head has a non-documented attribute called wicket:scope that may help here. I haven't used it (otherwise I'd document it) and I'm not quite sure whether it will do the job On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Ashoka Upadhya aupad...@art.com wrote: I would like to aggregate all javascript and move to the bottom of the page. I looked into the resource aggregation example and also filtering header response. If I understand correctly header response filter methods are called only when the scripts are added explicitly through IHeaderResponse methods (renderJavaSCriptReference ..etc) ** ** In our case, scripts are added in the markup (these markups are defined in the CMS). Is there a way to collect all scripts from the markup and also added through IHeaderResponse? ** ** Regards, Ashoka Upadhya Principal Software Engineer Art.com Phone: (510) 879-4858 Fax: (510) 588-3930 [image: art.com, inc] ** ** [image: art.com] http://www.art.com/ [image: allposters.com] http://www.allposters.com/ [image: artist] http://www.artistrising.com/ If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy the original e-mail and its attachments without reading or saving them. This e-mail and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential or privileged information that is prohibited from disclosure under confidentiality agreement or applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any of the information contained in or attached to this e-mail is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you. -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
wicket 6 global services
hej, I have few questions about how to do few things in wicket, right now I m focusing on 6th version. I would like to create global service that returns for example JSON or html. and given I have stateless page with components that supports AJAX I would like to point my JS components to this global service. I think it best to accomplish this with mounting 1) mount resource and then use getRequestCycle().urlFor(resourceReference, parameters); 2) if I have to return html maybe it is better to mount page I ve also found somewhere that I could implement custom renderers that could render simple html or jason or whatever text I need, but I cannot find anything about right now. what about adding custom RequestCycleListener, or something like that? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 6 dynamic form parts generated in JS
hej, I would like to dynamically add same part to form, let say I have a form that has a section with 3 inputs : start, end and name. those section can occur many times depending on model. this is very easy when depending on server logic and making full page refresh every time users add section via link. I would like to add such section from javascript, without server interaction. the problem I see is that I need to generate names of inputs in section witch will contain the right index so wicket knows where to put data, right? example form ol li wicket:id=each.section div wicket:id=form.part/div /li /ol /form I created custom FormComponentPanel and overridden convertInput. and added ListView to create list with panels. when I looked on generated html, names of input where something like : name=each.section:1:form.part:start, so I guess I could generate something like that in JS but I wonder if this will not break wicket logic. more even I hack those names creating elements in JS list will not be synchronised with model on server and they will be removed when user refreshes the page I think the best way to do it is to make a round trip to server with ajax and replace form content every time user clicks a button. what do you think? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 6 using external session
hej, I need to handle 2 frameworks in the same time (one with legacy application and wicket application that will handle pieces of old functionality and new features - at least for some time until everything is rewritten to wicket app) - maybe Im wrong here but this means I need to share session between those to frameworks. has anyone done something like that. I thinking of using some key-value database that scales well or some centralised custom rest service. any thoughts on implementation provided that wicket stores a lot in session, what about rendering to buffer and so on. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: rough estimate of when wicket 1.6 will be released?
by 1.6 you mean 6, right? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: Securing Resource in Web Context
can't you put your resources to DB ?? then you will have quick access and it will be secure? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: JavaFX2 and Wicket
those are totally two different technologies. wicekt can generate you html and you can embed flash or javafx applet there. I doubt there is any integration between wicket and flash or java fx. look at javafx tutorial first (they create html file there) and then learn how you can create such page in wicket pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: call a javascript
check wicket.ajax and its method getAjax or something like that. if you use AjaxEventBehavior then the ajax callback (which uses that js getAjax method) is already coded for you. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: Tighter Wicket-Spring integration
also you need to consider that wicket components will be accessed from different threads pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Stateless and Ajax
I dont know if the conversation you pointed to can explain anything for this question;] I can only guess that if you make ajax call and you already have page created then it is faster, from what I know solution like jolira creates new page and whole component tree over and over again on each ajax call. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Stateless and Ajax
;] hurray pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: handling request to component - the wicket way
ok, thanks I ll look at it during weekend pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Problems with requests to MountPath and optional parameters
maybe try date as milseconds (as long)? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: handling request to component - the wicket way
1.5.4 why? if you have any resources I ve overlooked it d be great if you can share them:] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: guestbook application with database update
it really doesnt matter where you get your data - from ArrayList or db - wrap code to access db into some function that return List and use LoadableDetachableModel as sven advised pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket appl architecture
well but then you need to rewrite some logic you already have in wicket's components, right? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
redirecting, cookies, render mode and testing
hej,
maybe Im still confusing basics concepts but this is quite new stuff.
recently I had few problems with redirecting after setting cookies (my
application was setup to use render-to-buffer default strategy).
simple setResponsePage is not good enough as cookies are lost then I
was advised to use ReplaceHandlerException and rewrite response
actions (like setting cookies) from response to original response.
private void rewriteResponseActions()
{
final RequestCycle cycle = RequestCycle.get();
Response response = cycle.getResponse();
Response originalResponse = cycle.getOriginalResponse();
//it only makes sense for IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse
//in tests originalResponse is same as response
if (originalResponse != response response instanceof
IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse)
{
IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse bufferingWebResponse =
(IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse) response;
bufferingWebResponse.writeMetaData((WebResponse) originalResponse);
}
}
this works fine, redirect is not scheduled and is immediately performed.
there is one but however!
setting my application to use one-pass-render strategy breaks url
rendering. the app is redirected correctly but url is as it was before
redirecting.
I was investigating that and it seems it is because in
WebPageRenderer#respond(RequestCycle requestCycle) currentUrl (the one
from before redirection) is used instead of targetUrl (the one where
we want redirect to)
if (isOnePassRender() isAjax == false getRedirectPolicy() !=
RedirectPolicy.ALWAYS_REDIRECT)
then
BufferedWebResponse response = renderPage(currentUrl, requestCycle);
// but new requestHandler (the one from replace handler exception) is
used
now probably I should pass ALWAYS_REDIRECT instead of AUTO_REDIRECT to
just created ReplaceHandlerException and it would fix all my problems
but I didnt.
I decided that I will go back to setResponsePage and reuse
rewiriteResponseActions just before redirection. And it all works fine
(yeah I really dont need immediate redirection), cookies are
persisted. So why this is not part of default behaviour?
the other thing is that wicket tester uses totally different logic and
it always passes my redirect tests no matter which redirection method
I choose (setResponsePage or throw ReplaceHandlerException) as
cycle.getResponse() and cycle.getOriginalResponse() returns the same
object and cookies are already there.
If this is WAD then OK but maybe it could be described better somewhere.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
this should go to separate conversation I created stateless (no stateful components) page if user is authorized i put his id to session so I can load it on each page creation (since it is stateless and not versioned it will be created on each request) pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 9 January 2012 12:39, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: The stateless/stateful issue, on the surface at least, seems to be trivially easy because it's so black and white. Obviously in an ideal world most pages should be made stateless but in all but trivial sites this is near impossible. I'd like to suggest there is a fair amount of 'gray' - that things aren't so 'black and white' in the real world. For example - the content on most of the pages on our sites are essentially stateless - showing product details or FAQ pages or About Us pages until you realize that *every* web app that has authentication (which one doesn't these days?) shows the currently logged on user's username in an 'account details' component in the top/right of each page with an option to change profile settings and log out etc,. This has become much more than just a convention - it's virtually a defacto standard. Once we add that very common account details component to the top of each page the pages essentially become stateful so essentially a site with predominantly stateless pages now has to be stateful. The main issue that I am trying to avoid by removing page versions is SEO confusion whereby each time a search engine looks at a URL it sees a different page version parameter in the URL. It's a similar problem to the famous jsessionid parameter issue. Given that search engines never authenticate it prompts the question: is it possible for a given page to have multiple personalities? i.e. stateless if no authentication has taken place and stateful if authentication has taken place. User's don't really care if there is an extra page version parameter in the URL and this can be of great assistance in making the back button function correctly - especially if their interactions have changed content on the various pages (eg. showing contents of their shopping cart - hmmm, that's a problem - probably always want to show the 'current' shopping cart contents no matter how much they have gone 'back' otherwise things could get quite confusing) Search engines, on the other hand, don't really want to see the extra page version parameter. Setting up pages to have dual personalities would be a most excellent solution methinks. Is this possible/easy/a good idea in Wicket? Is it something that is such a common requirement that it could be added to the Wicket framework as a built in feature and save hours of work for both experienced and newbie Wicketeers? If it were a switchable option built into the framework wicket would only need to query the AuthenticatedWebSession.isSignedIn() to determine if each page should be stateless or stateful. Or perhaps an IAuthenticator interface needs to be supplied to allow it to work for developers who implement their own authenticated session object. Just thinking aloud ... again ;) Regards, Chrisco -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 8:37 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: Not sure if I have an answer to your question but recently I asked how to turn off page versioning and was told to do: getRequestCycleSettings(). setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.RenderStrategy.ONE_PASS_RENDER); Actually this just turns off the redirecting. The pages are still versioned. So would getPageSettings().setVersionPagesByDefault(false); have been a better/safer option for turning off page versioning? Yes. I tried setVesionPagesByDefault(false) on its own but the version parameters still appeared in the URL in the browser address bar. Should we use both of the above to make page versioning disappear so as to make Wicket 1.5 behave just like version 1.5? Make your page stateless to not have page ids in the URL (and the page wont be saved in the page stores too). Otherwise you'll need special version of org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.MountedMapper#mapHandler that doesn't org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.AbstractComponentMapper#encodePageComponen tInfo for IPageRequestHandler. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
any ideas about #base_domain=mydomain.com problem ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
ok I found the reason oAuth provider adds this #base_domain to callback url. I just dont understand why it stayed after redirection. the other issue (that after redirect urls looks like callback) is that I use ReplaceHandlerException and I rewrite data from original response to preserve cookies. so I will look at this pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
ok currently im using 1.5.3 i ll check with snapshot pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
ok so bind on session does the trick. now I looked at setAttribute method and I dont understand why the flow is altered when session is temporary. unfortunately I still get this #base_domain=mydoamin. so 1.5-SNAPSHOT behaves like 1.5.3 now I looked closely to url after last redirect to homepage (using ONE_PASS_RENDER strategy) and it is exactly the same as oauth callback plus this #base_domain=mydomain.com parameter :/ when I use default RenderStrategy.REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER then I just get #base_domain=mydomain parameter any ideas? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
hej I have weird problem with session that I cannot explain and that I don't fully understand. I started with default application settings and stateful web page. and the flow is that I 1. request homepage 2. put data to session 3. redirect to authorize with oauth provider (facebook, gmail, etc) which in turn redirects back to my page 4. get data saved before in session 5. redirect to homepage then I made page stateless and it works perfectly fine until I set getPageSettings().setVersionPagesByDefault(false); (I dont need back button functionality) then session was not created even though I put there something (well it is not quite right session is created but not persisted between requests - just after I put to session I can get the data from session, but on next request to wicket data is gone). can you explain why is that? one more thing after last redirect (step 5) wicket added ?#base_domain=mydomain.com to url. when I set getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.RenderStrategy.ONE_PASS_RENDER); url is as oauth callback (from step 3) and I would expect it to be clean homepage url (ex mydomain.com/) for both render strategies thanks for help pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unit testing cookies after redirect
hej, SO it seems that errors I got was because of my bad testing. I created simple test in new project and it now works. the only problem is that 1. wicket tester process request twice after startPage - the first time the page is rendered and cookies are saved into AddCookieAction. then request is processed second time and this time all actions are invoked and cookie is finally added to second response. Is this because wicket is always redirecting browser with render request?? 2. after request is fully processed the original request and response are saved as lastRequest and lastResonse (llok at recordRequestResponse in WicketBaseTester). cookies are in tester.getLastResponse().getCookies() 3. the thing which is not intuitive is the fact that after one request is fully processed the new request (and response) is created but cookies from last response are not rewritten to it. cookies will be added when new request will be processed by tester on next startPage. I think that's it, hope I got this right this time ;] and it may help someone pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
;] hehe yep this is a little misunderstatement ;] from that point this is ok.
well as vineet said it is small gain but it will be less confusing for
coders. (we are just discussing, right?? no hard feelings ;])
what about locator issue I pointed out??
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 28 November 2011 12:47, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
martin,
i actually know what you are referring to user code and library code :)
i am not saying dont do that cast,just saying it can be hidden from a
wicket user,
wicket user will just override the new method which will have
formcomponent generic type,the getconverter(*) method will call the
new method ,do casting etc. like it was discussed in that thread..
but yeah the gain is not worth the pain ..
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
:-)
We have different understanding of what is user code ...
I mean that you do that once in the component (e.g. DateTextField) and
then you can do:
Date asDate = dateField.getConverter(Date.class).convertToObject(...,
locale)
Calendar asCalendar =
dateField.getConverter(Calendar.class).convertToObject(..., locale)
Integer sinceEpoch =
dateField.getConverter(Integer.class).convertToObject(..., locale)
...
So, you do the cast in the library code (it doesn't matter that the
component is yours. in this case you have your own library) and from
there on all clients of this component don't need to cast.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:05 AM, vineet semwal
vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
public final C IConverterC getConverter(ClassC clazz)
{
if (Date.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz))
{
return (IConverterC)converter; // cast
}
else
{
return super.getConverter(clazz);
}
}
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Vineet,
Can you paste an example that needs casting in the users' code ?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:20 AM, vineet semwal
vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
you are right cast is only done once but it is done by *wicket users*
when they override the method,
it can be avoided by introducing the new method like it is discussed
in the that thread but the gain is
minimal..
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:11 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
dont get me wrong, technically it is OK, it is just the logic is
unclear and code redundant.
In my opinion frameworks are build to simplify work, that's why I said
it should ring bells - this goes in wrong direction.
I think this response
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-properly-override-getConverter-on-FormComponent-subclasses-tp3744435p3744867.html
explains that the cast is done once, in the library code, and then all
users' code gain from that. No casts in the users' code
I perfectly understand that Component has no idea of type declared on
descendant but for me it simply doesnt matter. Component should knew
itself that it has converter and if there is none it should ask
application for any. now this two step process is implemented in one
method.
Component.java has no converter. Its #getConverter() just delegates to
the ConverterLocator
Any component may have its own converter, but since Component class
has no generic type and IConverter class has such we experience
troubles when we want to mix the generic type of for example
FormComponentT with IConverterT because FormComponent's T is
declared at type level, and IConverter's T at method level
(Component.getConverter()), and as a result Java says that these T's
are not the same type.
I just dont understand why getting converter is so strict right now,
thats all
Try to improve it. Play with the source and if you have success come
back with your solution.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 27 November 2011 15:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
well yeah this is exactly the same except for locator.
code like this
public final C IConverterC getConverter(ClassC clazz)
{
if (Date.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz))
{
return (IConverterC)converter;
}
else
{
return super.getConverter(clazz);
}
}
should always ring bells that something is wrong.
Care to explain what exactly is wrong ?
anyway I think that type checking should be done while registering
the
converter and not while getting it.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Re: How to test just a panel using apache wicket?
well im talking about 1.5.3, and it is not like you startPanel and it works, as it will try to call constructor with one parameter of the string type. If your panel has constructor with more than only id then you cant simply use it. so i guess this was a case where ITesterPanelSource was useful but now it is deprecated. And the javadoc says that startComponent should be used instead but this is not the same functionality and it is quite confusing to me. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: How to test just a panel using apache wicket?
ok I think I was blind yesterday ;] and I need to admit that javadoc is correct and says exactly the same thing (to use startComponentInPage(C component) thanks ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
hi all,
In 1.5 getConverter has new signature using generics : public C
IConverterC getConverter(ClassC type)
and this is nice when you have global converter registered in
application but in 1.4 it was handy to return different converter in
specific component by overriding its getConverter(type).
now it is also possible but it requires casting from C type to target
type of the component and then back to C. for me this is a bit
inconsistent as component always knows which type it using.
maybe there should be additional method that can be overridden and it
will return converter of type declared on component, what do you
think??
public abstract class LinkL
{
public Link(String id, IModelL model)
{
super(id, model);
}
@Override
public IConverterL getConverter()
{
return new MyCustomConverterThatIsUsingTypeL;
}
}
and another things is how ConverterLocator sets converters.
it is possible to register converter that doesnt match key type
ConverterLocator locator = (ConverterLocator) super.newConverterLocator();
locator.set(MyType.class, new IConverterString()
{
@Override
public String convertToObject(String value, Locale locale)
{
return null;
}
@Override
public String convertToString(String value, Locale locale)
{
return null;
}
});
where set should be declared as public final C IConverterC
set(final ClassC c, final IConverterC converter).
how you deal with this things? maybe there is a better way
thanks
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
something like that, my google didnt show any result for getConverter 1.5 ;] I will read that, thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
well yeah this is exactly the same except for locator.
code like this
public final C IConverterC getConverter(ClassC clazz)
{
if (Date.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz))
{
return (IConverterC)converter;
}
else
{
return super.getConverter(clazz);
}
}
should always ring bells that something is wrong.
anyway I think that type checking should be done while registering the
converter and not while getting it.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
dont get me wrong, technically it is OK, it is just the logic is
unclear and code redundant.
In my opinion frameworks are build to simplify work, that's why I said
it should ring bells - this goes in wrong direction.
I perfectly understand that Component has no idea of type declared on
descendant but for me it simply doesnt matter. Component should knew
itself that it has converter and if there is none it should ask
application for any. now this two step process is implemented in one
method.
I just dont understand why getting converter is so strict right now, thats all
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 27 November 2011 15:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
well yeah this is exactly the same except for locator.
code like this
public final C IConverterC getConverter(ClassC clazz)
{
if (Date.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz))
{
return (IConverterC)converter;
}
else
{
return super.getConverter(clazz);
}
}
should always ring bells that something is wrong.
Care to explain what exactly is wrong ?
anyway I think that type checking should be done while registering the
converter and not while getting it.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5
fair enough ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to test just a panel using apache wicket?
for me this does not works either in 1.5.3 as inner test page has no markup pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: How to test just a panel using apache wicket?
the javadoc of ITesterPanelSource says Depreced since no longer needed in 1.5.3 can you give examples? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException from onClick
ok thanks for quick replay, I think there should be more info in javadoc about the intension fo the exception and continueToOriginalDestination method pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 November 2011 03:40, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.cawrote: Hi, If you need a reference to the referrer, you could simply store the current page's PageReference which is available with getPage().getPageReference(). Then use setResponsePage(SignInPage.**class) to go to the login page. PageReference is a serializable id that can later be used in your login form submit method with setResponsePage(pageRef.** getPage()); There is no need for using the exception mechanism for this. Storing in the session means that multiple tabs won't work. You might want to send the pageRef directly as a parameter to the SignInPage constructor instead, but it will make your page stateful. Bertrand On 20/11/2011 5:59 PM, kamiseq wrote: hej, I'm just looking form clarification on RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception and continueToOriginalDestination(**). On every page I have a log-in link, and after log in I should be redirected back to the original destination. I use oauth api that requires that I redirect user to external url and then user will be redirected back to my service. In handler for onClick i have new RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception(MainPage.class); throw new RedirectToUrlException(url); intercept page does not matter as I do not throw the exception I just save InterceptData in session so next time I call continueToOriginalDestination(**) this data will be used. the only problem is that while saving (from RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception.InterceptData) Request request = RequestCycle.get().getRequest(**); data.originalUrl = request.getOriginalUrl(); originalUrl point to onClick callback and then app loops. I could of course save page instance and then redirect to it, but this is reinventing the mechanism that wicket already provides, isn't it? I know that RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception is used with accessing protected resources with IUnauthorizedComponentInstanti**ationListener and then url always points to page and not to handler. thanks for any comment on that pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unit testing cookies after redirect
ok I ll do it this week thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 21 November 2011 09:52, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I have also noticed that once but didn't have time to investigate it further and later I forgot about it ... Can you create a simple quickstart and attach it to Jira. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:41 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hej, well I tried to follow the cookies in wicket tester. starting from the beginning I have page A that while constructing adds new cookie to response and throws (as Martin advised) ReplaceHandlerException pointing to page B. everything goes well and cookies are carried inside original response until BaseWicketTester.processRequest(forcedRequest, forcedRequestHandler, redirect) - setupNextRequestCycle() were new request and new response is created and my cookies info is gone :/ I guess that cookies from last response should be rewritten to new request, right?? I a bit confused how this works here, I have problems with cooking when Im testing it inside jetty so maybe this is something on my side only :/ any ideas? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 9 November 2011 15:01, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: so if this is the last line in my code those two approaches are pretty the same pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unit testing continueToOriginalDestination
it sounds like a plan ;] I thought it will be something in wicket tester, thanks for a hint anyway ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: unit testing continueToOriginalDestination
again sounds like a plan ;] ok, I will try to do that at the end of the week pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ 2011/11/21 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com We can build it in...open a jira and attach a patch :) -igor On Nov 21, 2011 10:51 AM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: it sounds like a plan ;] I thought it will be something in wicket tester, thanks for a hint anyway ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
unit testing continueToOriginalDestination
hej, Im a bit stuck, I tried to search something but all resources points to older version and it seems that in 1.5 a lot ve changed. I have a page that does its work and then continueToOriginalDestination or it this returns false do some more stuff. unit testing the case when it returns false was easy ;] but now I try to figure out how to test that my code calls continueToOriginalDestination and tries to redirect. I tried this http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg09904.html but this was for wicket 1.3 pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: unit testing cookies after redirect
hej, well I tried to follow the cookies in wicket tester. starting from the beginning I have page A that while constructing adds new cookie to response and throws (as Martin advised) ReplaceHandlerException pointing to page B. everything goes well and cookies are carried inside original response until BaseWicketTester.processRequest(forcedRequest, forcedRequestHandler, redirect) - setupNextRequestCycle() were new request and new response is created and my cookies info is gone :/ I guess that cookies from last response should be rewritten to new request, right?? I a bit confused how this works here, I have problems with cooking when Im testing it inside jetty so maybe this is something on my side only :/ any ideas? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 9 November 2011 15:01, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: so if this is the last line in my code those two approaches are pretty the same pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException from onClick
hej, I'm just looking form clarification on RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException and continueToOriginalDestination(). On every page I have a log-in link, and after log in I should be redirected back to the original destination. I use oauth api that requires that I redirect user to external url and then user will be redirected back to my service. In handler for onClick i have new RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(MainPage.class); throw new RedirectToUrlException(url); intercept page does not matter as I do not throw the exception I just save InterceptData in session so next time I call continueToOriginalDestination() this data will be used. the only problem is that while saving (from RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException.InterceptData) Request request = RequestCycle.get().getRequest(); data.originalUrl = request.getOriginalUrl(); originalUrl point to onClick callback and then app loops. I could of course save page instance and then redirect to it, but this is reinventing the mechanism that wicket already provides, isn't it? I know that RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException is used with accessing protected resources with IUnauthorizedComponentInstantiationListener and then url always points to page and not to handler. thanks for any comment on that pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: wicket 1.5.3 problems with cookies
hej, so I tired CookieUtils and still cookies are not persisted. I ve checked it both on GAE and jetty I can try setup fresh wicket and check it there but it just strange pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
well, I have nothing against writing my own SQL with spring;] but it is true that before I read wicket in action I was like a child in fog :/ after JSP I started palying with tapestry and tapestry has a bit better introduction pages. it is not that there is not enough information around but wicket lacks free introduction that shows the wicket way (but maybe I could not find it). looking at wicket stuff is hard at the beginning. I tried vaadin and tapestry and I still find wicket as very nice framework anyway I would never ever go back to JSP ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ On 18 November 2011 10:35, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: Breaks POJOS: A real POJO does not need to implement an interface or extend a class. A object oriented framework is a foundation on which you extend your application. Back in the C++ world there was MFC, OWL, .Net, etc., In the Java world there was AWT and then Swing etc.,. All event driven, object oriented component based frameworks. All were pretty easy to build desktop applications in. Most of an application's UI elements extended from core classes in the framework. That's just how you use OO frameworks. If you want to write UI elements that do not extend or implement classes of interfaces of a 'framework' then you're not really using any framework and reinventing the wheel. Bad Defaults: Most pages are stateless. Every page in our app is stateful. We show the username of the current user at the top of the page after logging on and we also have a panel on the right that shows alerts specific to the current user. Sure the main content of each page is not delivered differently per user but many of the auxiliary components are. Causes a redeploy whenever you add anything: Maybe Java developers are used to this, but in any other web development environment I do not need to redeploy after adding a text box to the page. We use a component resolver. That can make it possible for the HTML markup to drive the component hierarchy without explicitly adding components in Java code each time you want to add a new component. Stateful Component based framework are a terrible idea: Even at the theoretical level this is a bad idea. It is a leaky abstraction over a simple request/response cycle. My examples of desktop app frameworks above were all event driven, object oriented, component based frameworks. This model evolved to be *universal* in the desktop world for a good reason - it's a damn fine architecture IMHO and obviously in the opinion of the rest of the world of desktop application developers. Einstein said, Make something as simple as possible but not too simple. Request/response is just too simple to be useful for anyone who has come through from the desktop application world and 'gets' event driven, object oriented component based architectures. When I moved from desktop to web development I went CGI, servlets, JSPs, Struts, Echo and now Wicket. Until I started using Echo Wicket my web app days were never as fun or 'clean' as ye olde desktop app days. For me Wicket is the ONLY web UI framework that gives me the same kind of development productivity and clean, reusable application source code that I enjoyed in the desktop app development world. It made something simple and made it overly complicated. This remind me of Hibernate and ORMS. Yeah, ok, if you're not using an ORM in your apps by now and still spending your days writing SQL glue code then we need to have a talk ;) Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.5.3 problems with cookies
hi martin, so yes previously I had a problem with unit tests when I was setting cookie and redirecting with throw new RestartResponseException(new MyOtherPage()); then you advised to used NonResettingRestartException but this for some reason (I had no time yet to investigate) is breaking unittest so now I am using setResponsePage(pageClass); now I try to test it live with jetty and gae and for both servers it is failing. (to redirect I use setResponsePage) pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 1.5.3 problems with cookies
hej,
it seems that wicket is not storing cookies :/.
im adding TEST cookie with
final Cookie cookie = new Cookie(name, value);
cookie.setMaxAge(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
((WebResponse)getResponse()).addCookie(cookie);
and reading it on different page
final ListCookie cookies = ((WebRequest) getRequest()).getCookies();
Cookie result = null;
for (Cookie cookie : cookies)
{
final String name = cookie.getName();
log.fine(checking cookie name=+ name);
if (name.equals(cookieName))
result = cookie;
}
return result;
but only
checking cookie name=JSESSIONID is logged
this is very odd :/ any ideas?
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
Re: unit testing cookies after redirect
so if this is the last line in my code those two approaches are pretty the same pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: unit testing cookies after redirect
ok, thanks for that. I have one small question that is bugging me for a while. What would be the difference between throwing exception or setResponsePage(pageClass);?? I ve found somewhere that I should always throw RestartException, but I see setResponsePage so many times that Im confused. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
unit testing cookies after redirect
hej,
I ve found this
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wickettester-cookies-and-redirects-in-Wicket-1-4-15-td3250792.html
but im developing on 1.5.2 and ticket is closed. I believe it is the same case.
this is description:
I have a page ValidationPage that accepts request, checks parameters
and sets cookie on response object
((WebResponse)getRequestCycle().getResponse()).addCookie(new
Cookie(mycookie, VAL));
then on certain condition I want to redirect to original destination
or to some set page
if (!continueToOriginalDestination())
{
log.warning(redirect failed redirecting to original destination);
throw new RestartResponseException(new MyOtherPage());
}
so in test
tester.startPage(ValidationPage.class, pageParameters);
tester.assertRenderedPage(MyOtherPage.class);
final Cookie[] cookies = tester.getRequest().getCookies();
assertNotNull(cookies); - fail
and I get null, I tried Reponse object but no luck. I thought cookies
should be resend in next request back to server right?
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: request parameters
I understand you mean something like this
final StringValue val1 = parameters.get(val1);
final Service service = ServiceFactory.getClient(val1);
final IRequestParameters requestParameters =
getRequest().getQueryParameters();
final SetString parameterNames = requestParameters.getParameterNames();
MapString, String params = new HashMapString,
String(parameterNames.size());
for (String name : parameterNames)
{
final StringValue val = requestParameters.getParameterValue(name);
params.put(name, val.toString());
}
service.handle(params);
giving it a second thought I could use
final ListPageParameters.NamedPair named = parameters.getAllNamed();
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
request parameters
hej,
I need to obtain request parameters as Map like I would if I had
access to HttpServletRequest but with PageParameters I can't find a
way to do it
I have mounted page with pattern : /mypage/${param1}/${param2}
so every time I get request to myapp.com/mypage/val1/val2?key=val I
would like to get map of these parameters and pass it to service that
do not know anything about Page or PageParameters, on the other hand
page don know which parameter service is interested in.
how I can solve this problem?
thanks
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: request parameters
well this is not fixed.
the url will alwyas begin with
*
myapp.com/mypage/val1/val2*
but it may also contain additional keys like
*myapp.com/mypage/val1/val2?key=val* or
*myapp.com/mypage/val1/val2?otherkey=valkeykey=val* etc
inside my page im only interested in val1, val2 and depend on those values
I will choose service impl where I want pass all key-val pairs from request.
val1/val2 parameters are not a problem I can easily get them from
PageParameters using get(String) the trouble I have is that PageParameter
object is not built under original request's Map.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
On 31 October 2011 23:54, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
under what key should ${param1}/${param2} be stored?
-igor
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:30 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote:
hej,
I need to obtain request parameters as Map like I would if I had
access to HttpServletRequest but with PageParameters I can't find a
way to do it
I have mounted page with pattern : /mypage/${param1}/${param2}
so every time I get request to myapp.com/mypage/val1/val2?key=val I
would like to get map of these parameters and pass it to service that
do not know anything about Page or PageParameters, on the other hand
page don know which parameter service is interested in.
how I can solve this problem?
thanks
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
oauth client with wicket
hej, Im trying to add simple user authorisation to my app with oauth. in order to authenticate and authorize a user I need to redirect that user to oauth service, the redirect url contains parameter with callback url to my app (oauth controller will send response via HTTP 302 - I am not sure if this has any impact, probably I need to read more about it). form callback url I can obtain user specific code and then send another request to receive access_token to authorize all my operation. (I havent tested it yet so this all theory) I ve already created a filter to handle callback and do all I need, then I am sending redirect to wicket app once Im done. but I think I could create a Page and use it's getPageRelativePath() as a callback url (something like http://url_to_wicket_app/callbackHandlerPage) and handle response there. What do you think? I ll be inside wicket so any exception will be handled by wicket and proper error page will be displayed. another problem is that I need to support more then one aouth service (like facebook, twitter, etc) so I thought I could add a token value to callback url (something like http://url_to_wicket_app/callbackHandlerPage/twitter) and then strip this token and put it to parameter map. Is there a way to filter a request before it hits target page using wicket configuration or should I use custom filter defined in web.xml? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: form component that is rendered as select or read-only input
why not call this code in onBeforeRender?? as I read Component code
onConfigure is called once per request and so is onBeforeRender and javadoc
states that
NOTE: Component hierarchy should not be modified inside this method
(onConfigure), instead it should be done in {@link #onBeforeRender()}
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
form component that is rendered as select or read-only input
hej, Im creating a component that is a panel - part of a form. I pass a LoadableDetachableModel to it with a list of items. when list size is greater then 1 I display a select html component to render all choices. but when list contains only one item I would like to show read only input because at this time user will not be able to choose another item anyway. but when I close a page with form and update list (ie item was added so there is more than one or items was removed so there is only one item) and reopen the page with the form again I will see form with wrong component (right?) as whole page was saved and panel with form components will not be created again (right?). how can I design this panel so it is more dynamic? should I use repeaters? or something like that? thanks for any help pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: form component that is rendered as select or read-only input
hym ;] thanks;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
how to setup guice in unit test
hej, I ve found something something like this http://blog.yanivkessler.com/2010/06/writing-unit-tests-for-guicey-wicket.htmlbut I think there should be some easier way to setup guice DI. I tried to use AtUnit but it doesnt work with webpages( I get *org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no application attached to current thread main *or object are not simply injected) can you explain how to configure it?* * pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: how to setup guice in unit test
ok, then I think I just took the wrong turn ;] I dont know why they bother themselves with custom testRunner pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
widgets support
hi, I need to create simple service that returns html content and then talks to my client with json. I would like to integrate this with other services/daos/etc I have injected to my pages. this 'widget' will not be a part of a page from the beginning but should be a part of application. some script on the page will call the service and it should respond with json so client could render itself or with html to speed up that initialization. what do you think, where should I start looking. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: Basic TextField question
why cannot you change value in model and detach it? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: guice injection on WebApplication init
hi, I have one small question : how to write tests if I configured Application with GuiceWebApplicationFactory? I ve found AtUnit project but this depends on basic configuration inside application class. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: guice injection on WebApplication init
ok GuiceWebApplicationFactory works like a charm. but now I consider moving this init db code to custom guice module so I can easily swap configuration and have WebApplication class clean;] again thanks for replay pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: guice injection on WebApplication init
heh ok I tired to be too smart ;] anyway thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
guice injection on WebApplication init
hi, my wicket application uses guice to inject services and dao-s. it works fine but recently I started to use in-memory db. so I need somehow initialize(create tables, insert some sample data) my db after getComponentInjector() and before getHomePage(). of course I could (out of guice configuration) create new DataSource and run code in WebApplication.init() method but this seems to me as big hack. can somebody help me with that. thanks pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: guice injection on WebApplication init
thanks for a quick replay Ill try this tomorrow :] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: FormComponent convertInput for children FormComponets
maybe you need to set type for each control, I had similar issue. look at the wicket code where the value is set. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
wicket tags
hi, this is more about how you guys working with wicket rather then a bug or something. and as Im relativelly new to wicket maybe you can help me out. I created panels that can be extended ie. wicket:panel headermy header/header form wicket:child/wicket:child input type=text / /form /wicket:panel usually I style the component in offline mode (without running the server) so I need to add some additional markup to mock it, plus I set wicket to strip wicket tags and override onComponentTag to set name of the tag (let say section) so it look like. section class=custom-component-class wicket:panel!-- this will go away -- headermy header/header form wicket:child/wicket:child input type=text / /form /wicket:panel /section so now the problem is that 1. I cannot use css selector like section.custom-component-class header or I need to comment the wicket:panel tag on time I style component 2. wicket:child is not recognized as valid html tag so I cannot add style to it ie. display:none 3. surrounding wicket:child element with some html tag makes no sens why wicket tags couldnt be attributes so any valid html could have attribute like wicket:behavior=panel or type=child or something like that I know that this is not a big issue. probably designer should create html + css styles first and then developer turn it into the working code but with time things like that are annoying, so how do you work with such problems? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: wicket tags
I know I can work around this, it is just I see it as a place to improve framework. I want to use immediate-child selectors because I see benefits from this whatever that is I know that in runtime those tags goes away but while working with raw html files (let say graphic designer takes them and fixes some bugs with styling/rendering) he needs to think about wicket as well. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
yep I did it like that and it works
public class Editor extends FormComponentPanelListString {
private ListViewString item;
/**
* If you dont have ArrayList you can always copy your collection to new
ArrayList.
*
* @param id of the control
* @param accounts a list of all accounts assigned to the peron.
*/
public Editor(String id, IModel items) {
super(id, items);
buildComponents();
}
private void buildComponents()
{
setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(false);
add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, editor-panel));
final ListString items = getModelObject();
item = new ListViewString(item, items){
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItemString listItem)
{
String number = listItem.getModelObject();
listItem.add(new NumberInput(number, number));
listItem.add(new RemoveButton(remove, number, items));
}
};
item.setReuseItems(true);
Link addButton = new Link(add){
@Override
public void onClick() {
items.add();
item.detach();
}
};
add(addButton);
add(item);
}
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
tag.setName(section);
super.onComponentTag(tag);
}
@Override
protected void convertInput()
{
setConvertedInput(saveConvertedData());
}
private ListString saveConvertedData()
{
final ListString items = new ArrayListString();
item.visitChildren(NumberInput.class, new
Component.IVisitorNumberInput(){
@Override
public Object component(NumberInput component) {
String number = component.getConvertedInput();
items.add(number);
return Component.IVisitor.CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
}
});
return items;
}
}
thanks for help
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
Re: formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
heh i thought I was smart :] as each component in FormComponentPanel is converted and validated so it would be easy to intercept value set on components model and add it to List (which is model of whole FCPanel) because Im not really converting components value to something bigger. the only problem is getting value for each component as interface is only getObject and setObject so there is no information model could decide which value goes to which component ;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
hej, on the second thought I can implement (in this simple case) a model backuped by List or Set and then let Form (or FormComponentPanel) to process all fields. pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
formComponentPanel with content generated by RepeatingView
hi,
Im trying to implement a simple form component that accepts List of Strings
*public class AccountsPanel extends FormComponentPanelListString
{
****public AccountsPanel(String id, ArrayListString accounts) {
******super(id, new Model(accounts));
buildComponents();
}
}
*and I am using RepeatingView to create as many TextField as many Strings
are in the List, and this is fine but how then convert each edited value of
the TextField back to List of Strings???
using convertInput would be a good choice I guess but I have no idea how to
iterate over panel's components and read value
*
@Override
protected void convertInput()
{
ListString accounts = getModelObject();*
*setConvertedInput(accounts);
}*
or maybe this is happening automagically :D
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
Re: dynamic child in container
hi again, so I really dont understand how to set hings up but I tried this yesterday around midnight :] so please forgive me ... let me explain again I have simple webpage *DashboardPage* (1) body a wicket:id=editwicket:message key=/w:m/a /body then I created a panel with a form *UserFormPanel*(2) body wicket:panel div class=popup form wicket:id=userData input .. / input type=submit / /form a wicket:id=cancelgo back/a /div /wicket:panel /body in *DashboardPage* I created AjaxLink for *edit* and tried to add * UserFormPanel* to requestTarget when link is clicked, but in turn wicket refused that saying the component has no outputMarkupID set to true (but it doesnt tell on which component I should set that property). the other thing is that I need to assign some wicket:id to *UserFormPanel*created in link callback. but this id does not correspond to any id in markup so I get (think I get:) an exception. how to set components right? I really cannot find anything on the web about this! is this so rare situation in wicket world??? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
dynamic child in container
hi, I ve googled a bit but all I ve found are links about panels. my problem is that I would like to create components (with corresponding html markup) and then add those components dynamically on request to target container, where child component could be other container that might be dynamically modified. what I read about panels is that you need always mark a placeholder for a child component so there is no way to add more or less child when my logic decides to do so. is this possible in wicket? could someone point me to some materials about it? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: dynamic child in container
thanks, so I understand that it is only possible with AJAX calls. could I make a link callback that will add random number of components on each request? there will be no wicket:id for dynamic child and I could generate as many components as I want, right? I will try this anyway;] pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
Re: wicket via websocket
thanks, I run into the first page but I was curious if I can do this depending only on wicket. but I will give it a try again pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __
