Re: Wicket on GAE
Josh, I asked a very similar question a few weeks ago and I've got almost no replays and no pointers to a real applications using both. Regards, Ernesto 1-http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/production-quality-wicket-applications-running-on-GAE-td2289729.html On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anyone running a significantly large application on GAE? I would like to know if a database driven wicket application is working on GAE and how much resources it consumes. I need this information to decide on whether GAE is a deployment option, or i need a servlet hosting service. Regards. Josh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Hiding parts of the path
Hi list, i want to services the same app using different (but structural identical) databases. say: http://foo.org/site/alpha http://foo.org/site/beta http://foo.org/site/ceti ... I have managed to get JPA working with an routing datasource, to switch the database depending on the url path. Now i need to tell Wicket that it should basically ignore those extra alpha, beta,.. path component when looking up the request target and add it back when generating urls. So, for Wicket, an incoming URL of http://foo.org/site/alpha/page1 should be treated as http://foo.org/site/site1. Of course, generated URL should include the extra information... My first idea was to overwrite the WicketFilter.getRelativePath() and remove the extra path component. This did not work. Any other idea? Would an UrlCodingStrategy help? thanks in advance Bert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: announcing Granite - a Wicket-Scala-DB4O web application stack
You could abstract the datastore in the stack using JDO/DataNucleus. It supports DB40. In fact as it also supports RDBMS you could easily create a datastore agnostic Wicket/Scala stack - that would be most awesome! Just as a side note: there is/was an mini example with warp persist which can handle db4o+neodatis (and with some minor work also hibernate): http://karussell.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/crud-with-wicket-guice-db4o-neodatis/ Regards, Peter. -- http://jetwick.com twitter search prototype - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Hiding parts of the path
you can try writing your own webrequestcodingstrategy, but be careful not to break relative urls. -igor On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, i want to services the same app using different (but structural identical) databases. say: http://foo.org/site/alpha http://foo.org/site/beta http://foo.org/site/ceti ... I have managed to get JPA working with an routing datasource, to switch the database depending on the url path. Now i need to tell Wicket that it should basically ignore those extra alpha, beta,.. path component when looking up the request target and add it back when generating urls. So, for Wicket, an incoming URL of http://foo.org/site/alpha/page1 should be treated as http://foo.org/site/site1. Of course, generated URL should include the extra information... My first idea was to overwrite the WicketFilter.getRelativePath() and remove the extra path component. This did not work. Any other idea? Would an UrlCodingStrategy help? thanks in advance Bert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Too frequent page creation in portlet environment
We are running Glassfish 3.0.1 + Liferay 5.2.3 and have some portlets using Wicket 1.4.9 (in deployment mode). These work fine on the platform when running on our local Windows developer PCs, but when deployed onto a Solaris server running the same software, forms stop working. Debugging indicates that the Pages' constructors are called more times than expected, i.e. submitting a portlet's form creates a new page (instead of using the instance created for the first rendering and which ought to be in the Session), once for the action phase (with the form data present) and then once for the render phase (where of course the parameters have gone). Debug output indicates that it does not create new Sessions, so the SessionStore seems OK. Is there some configuration that can differ between the two environments that can cause Wicket to behave differently? Can it be PageStore issues? Med vennlig hilsen TOR IVER WILHELMSEN Senior systemutvikler Arrive AS T (+47) 48 16 06 18 E-post: toriv...@arrive.no http://www.arrive.no http://servicedesk.arrive.no
using IOC in panels?
Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
onload
Hi,
Newbee question: I need to add the onload attribute to the body tag (I
can't use other methods to accomplish the same thing...)
My html:
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:wicket=http://org.apache.wicket.sourceforge.net/;
wicket:head
...
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
body wicket:id=bodyElement
...
/body
/wicket:extend
/html
Java:
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
�...@override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
�...@override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(onload, onload(););
}
});
Result html:
html
head
...
/head
body
body onload=onload();
...
I now have two body start tags.
The code below results in a runtime exception stating that bodyElement
was not declared..
body wicket:id=bodyElement
wicket:extend
...
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
I have also tried adding:
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(onload();), this));
But nothing gets added to the body tag.
Can someone direct me in the right direction?
Wicket version: 1.4.1
JDK: IBM JDK 5.0.10
Regards,
Jess
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Removing jsessionid from URl
is it because a user disables cookies in the browser? On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.nowrote: I have been tryin to figure out what to do to remove jsessionid from the URL The web container will add that to the first response URL when a session is created in case cookies are not supported. What is corny is that this is not further maintained (in a non-cookie situation) without the developer explicitly calling ServletResponse.encodeURL() for all URLs - the container should maintain the responsibility for you. - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Aladejebi Ayodeji A., DabarObjects Solutions Phone: +234 9 875 1763 Mobile: +234 803 589 1780 Email: d...@dabarobjects.com Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Re: FeedbackPanel does not clean up after displaying error messages using Ajax
Don't worry, we've all had those head -- palm moments :) PEBKAC. :) Maybe a FindBugs plugin that checks that overridden methods always have a non-empty implementation? Even the Eclipse built-in test for empty blocks would help in some cases (except it allows a comment to satisfy the condition). - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Saving a component in session
Hello, I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's children disappear. I do the save like this: session.bind(); session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component); Regards, Alexandru
onload
Hi,
Newbee question: I need to add the onload attribute to the body tag (I
can't use other methods to accomplish the same thing...)
My html:
html
wicket:head
...
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
body wicket:id=bodyElement
...
/body
/wicket:extend
/html
Java:
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
�...@override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
�...@override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(onload, onload(););
}
});
Result html:
html
head
...
/head
body
body onload=onload();
...
I now have two body start tags.
The code below results in a runtime exception stating that bodyElement
was not declared..
body wicket:id=bodyElement
wicket:extend
...
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
I have also tried adding:
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(onload();), this));
But nothing gets added to the body tag.
Can someone direct me in the right direction?
Wicket version: 1.4.1
JDK: IBM JDK 5.0.10
Regards,
Jess
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Nino, Can you just @SpringBean or @Inject? Don't know if this is the pretties way as this might be a matter of personal taste;-) Enresto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:14 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
SV: Removing jsessionid from URl
is it because a user disables cookies in the browser? Yes, in that case the rewritten URLs are needed to maintain session state. - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 1.5 migration guide lacking mount information
Hi Seems the way you mount pages has been change, the migration guide (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-WicketIOCchanges) does not mention this. Also the default way that 1.4 mapped pages was as a querystringurlcodingstrategy AFAIK, this has changed to indexed aswell.. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.5 migration guide lacking mount information
seem the wicket examples also are incomplete here as they uses deprecated calls: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/niceurl/NiceUrlApplication.java Igor and Martin seems to be working on a new example: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/requestmapper But what would the correct 1.5 way to mount a bookmarkablepage with a querystringurlcodingstrategy? 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi Seems the way you mount pages has been change, the migration guide (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-WicketIOCchanges) does not mention this. Also the default way that 1.4 mapped pages was as a querystringurlcodingstrategy AFAIK, this has changed to indexed aswell.. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: onload
Why do you have two components on bodyElement ?
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Ole Hansen ssej1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Newbee question: I need to add the onload attribute to the body tag (I
can't use other methods to accomplish the same thing...)
My html:
html
wicket:head
...
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
body wicket:id=bodyElement
...
/body
/wicket:extend
/html
Java:
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
@Override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(onload, onload(););
}
});
Result html:
html
head
...
/head
body
body onload=onload();
...
I now have two body start tags.
The code below results in a runtime exception stating that bodyElement
was not declared..
body wicket:id=bodyElement
wicket:extend
...
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
I have also tried adding:
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(onload();),
this));
But nothing gets added to the body tag.
Can someone direct me in the right direction?
Wicket version: 1.4.1
JDK: IBM JDK 5.0.10
Regards,
Jess
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members. Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes. P.S. The API above is for 1.5. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
but how should panel then be managed.. Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right? Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel? 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members. Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes. P.S. The API above is for 1.5. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that: you just use new as always. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: but how should panel then be managed.. Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right? Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel? 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members. Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes. P.S. The API above is for 1.5. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to be replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job easier. The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change visibility modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by implementing an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So my AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request arrives. I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the session on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I fetch the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the Label and TextField) are gone. Any ideas will be much appreciated. Thanks, Alexandru On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote: Hello, I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's children disappear. I do the save like this: session.bind(); session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component); Regards, Alexandru
Re: wicket 1.5 migration guide lacking mount information
Hi Nino, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: seem the wicket examples also are incomplete here as they uses deprecated calls: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/niceurl/NiceUrlApplication.java Currently the examples use the deprecated #mount() method which delegates to the new one: org.apache.wicket.Application.getRootRequestMapperAsCompound().add(new MountedMapper(path, MyPage.class)); Soon we will introduce something like mountPage(path, MyPage.class) which will do the same as above but with less typing. The same for mountResource(path, ResourceReference) (this will use ResourceMapper). getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() will stay there for the other less used mappers and your custom mappers. Igor and Martin seems to be working on a new example: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/requestmapper But what would the correct 1.5 way to mount a bookmarkablepage with a querystringurlcodingstrategy? use MountedMapper. It is smart mapper - works with both indexed and named parameters. To read them: pageParameters.get(name) or .get(0) - indexed. 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi Seems the way you mount pages has been change, the migration guide ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-WicketIOCchanges ) does not mention this. IOC changes are not related to page mapping ;-) Also the default way that 1.4 mapped pages was as a querystringurlcodingstrategy AFAIK, this has changed to indexed aswell.. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the instantiation listener to do its work On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that: you just use new as always. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: but how should panel then be managed.. Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right? Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel? 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members. Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes. P.S. The API above is for 1.5. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
ahh cool :) And thanks.. I know im spamming alot currently.. 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the instantiation listener to do its work On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that: you just use new as always. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: but how should panel then be managed.. Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right? Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel? 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members. Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes. P.S. The API above is for 1.5. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC. ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: I need to be able to inject a service into my panel.. Should I then just use: org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object). or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object) inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle? 2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: What is your need exactly? ** Martin 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need a sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way to do it? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.5 migration guide lacking mount information
Hehe, wrong link to the documentation.. But I actually do not get named parameters(it's just null) when using MountedMapper.. 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Hi Nino, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: seem the wicket examples also are incomplete here as they uses deprecated calls: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/niceurl/NiceUrlApplication.java Currently the examples use the deprecated #mount() method which delegates to the new one: org.apache.wicket.Application.getRootRequestMapperAsCompound().add(new MountedMapper(path, MyPage.class)); Soon we will introduce something like mountPage(path, MyPage.class) which will do the same as above but with less typing. The same for mountResource(path, ResourceReference) (this will use ResourceMapper). getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() will stay there for the other less used mappers and your custom mappers. Igor and Martin seems to be working on a new example: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/requestmapper But what would the correct 1.5 way to mount a bookmarkablepage with a querystringurlcodingstrategy? use MountedMapper. It is smart mapper - works with both indexed and named parameters. To read them: pageParameters.get(name) or .get(0) - indexed. 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi Seems the way you mount pages has been change, the migration guide ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-WicketIOCchanges ) does not mention this. IOC changes are not related to page mapping ;-) Also the default way that 1.4 mapped pages was as a querystringurlcodingstrategy AFAIK, this has changed to indexed aswell.. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.5 migration guide lacking mount information
See MountedMapperTest On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hehe, wrong link to the documentation.. But I actually do not get named parameters(it's just null) when using MountedMapper.. 2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Hi Nino, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: seem the wicket examples also are incomplete here as they uses deprecated calls: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/niceurl/NiceUrlApplication.java Currently the examples use the deprecated #mount() method which delegates to the new one: org.apache.wicket.Application.getRootRequestMapperAsCompound().add(new MountedMapper(path, MyPage.class)); Soon we will introduce something like mountPage(path, MyPage.class) which will do the same as above but with less typing. The same for mountResource(path, ResourceReference) (this will use ResourceMapper). getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() will stay there for the other less used mappers and your custom mappers. Igor and Martin seems to be working on a new example: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/requestmapper But what would the correct 1.5 way to mount a bookmarkablepage with a querystringurlcodingstrategy? use MountedMapper. It is smart mapper - works with both indexed and named parameters. To read them: pageParameters.get(name) or .get(0) - indexed. 2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com: Hi Seems the way you mount pages has been change, the migration guide ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-WicketIOCchanges ) does not mention this. IOC changes are not related to page mapping ;-) Also the default way that 1.4 mapped pages was as a querystringurlcodingstrategy AFAIK, this has changed to indexed aswell.. regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
*the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: onload
Hi,
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Why do you have two components on bodyElement ?
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
Yes it is redundant, but dosent seem to make a difference weather it
is there or not.
Thanks,
Jess
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Ole Hansen ssej1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Newbee question: I need to add the onload attribute to the body tag (I
can't use other methods to accomplish the same thing...)
My html:
html
wicket:head
...
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
body wicket:id=bodyElement
...
/body
/wicket:extend
/html
Java:
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
�...@override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
�...@override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(onload, onload(););
}
});
Result html:
html
head
...
/head
body
body onload=onload();
...
I now have two body start tags.
The code below results in a runtime exception stating that bodyElement
was not declared..
body wicket:id=bodyElement
wicket:extend
...
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
I have also tried adding:
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(onload();),
this));
But nothing gets added to the body tag.
Can someone direct me in the right direction?
Wicket version: 1.4.1
JDK: IBM JDK 5.0.10
Regards,
Jess
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Shall I create an RFE? Or this something that does not make much sense?
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable
?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
You don't need to have Wicket instantiate anything for you. The
listener knows when you instantiate any component (Component's
constructor does the magic). Just use @SpringBean in your panel and
it will work.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall I create an RFE? Or this something that does not make much sense?
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I
need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
I'd be curious to hear for what other classes you have in mind. You'll
always need to call the instantiation listener at some point to invoke the
injector.
So simply implementing IInstantiable will not be enough to have injection
magically work.
I think the reason it's currently implemented the way it is, is that all
components have a Component base class which can abstract behavior like
this.
In case you want dependency injection anywhere, you should take a look at
something like Salve (http://code.google.com/p/salve/)
Sebastian
- Original Message -
From: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: using IOC in panels?
Shall I create an RFE? Or this something that does not make much sense?
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I
need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest
way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: using IOC in panels?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ? How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component constructor does the notification. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
James,
I think know how it works: I was just wondering if it can be extended
for other types of objects and how useful it could be.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
You don't need to have Wicket instantiate anything for you. The
listener knows when you instantiate any component (Component's
constructor does the magic). Just use @SpringBean in your panel and
it will work.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall I create an RFE? Or this something that does not make much sense?
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I
need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest
way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this); As component does. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ? How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component constructor does the notification. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this); As component does. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ? How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component constructor does the notification. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
what about custom IModel impls ? it will work automatically for all IModel impls provided by Wicket, but will not work for custom ones. And then the users will start creating tickets ... On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this); As component does. Ernesto On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing IInstantiable ? How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component constructor does the notification. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Some Models maybe? Right now I have a few of them where I have
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
But maybe you are right and this out of Wicket's scope.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl wrote:
I'd be curious to hear for what other classes you have in mind. You'll
always need to call the instantiation listener at some point to invoke the
injector.
So simply implementing IInstantiable will not be enough to have injection
magically work.
I think the reason it's currently implemented the way it is, is that all
components have a Component base class which can abstract behavior like
this.
In case you want dependency injection anywhere, you should take a look at
something like Salve (http://code.google.com/p/salve/)
Sebastian
- Original Message - From: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: using IOC in panels?
Shall I create an RFE? Or this something that does not make much sense?
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah that would be handy.
2010/9/23 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Yes, I see:
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
Would it make sense (for 1.5) to have:
-an interface IInstantiable
-modify
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(IInstantiable component);
}
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Panel's constructor calls super() and Component's ctor asks the
instantiation listener to do its work
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a component instantiation listener that takes care of that:
you just use new as always.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
but how should panel then be managed..
Because if I create the panel myself in the page it won't work right?
Can I ask wicket to instansiate my panel?
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Panel is a Component, so you can use @Inject on the Panel members.
Use Injector.get().inject(target) only in non Component classes.
P.S. The API above is for 1.5.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
You must weigh benefits and cons about whereto manage your IOC.
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
I need to be able to inject a service into my panel..
Should I then just use:
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object).
or are there are prettier way? I feel that calling
org.apache.wicket.injection.Injector.get().inject(Object object)
inside my panels sort of violates the IOC principle?
2010/9/23 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
What is your need exactly?
**
Martin
2010/9/23 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Hi
what should I do if I want to use IOC in my panels? In short I
need
a
sort of a provider injected into a panel, what's the prettiest
way
to
do it?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: dynamic template page
Thanks a lot! IMarkupResourceStreamProvider does the trick:) - www.hermanhorsten.be -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/dynamic-template-page-tp2550354p2551774.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
*the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
Guys, I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for your time ! Mihai On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote: Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to be replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job easier. The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change visibility modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by implementing an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So my AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request arrives. I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the session on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I fetch the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the Label and TextField) are gone. Any ideas will be much appreciated. Thanks, Alexandru On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote: Hello, I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's children disappear. I do the save like this: session.bind(); session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component); Regards, Alexandru
Re: using IOC in panels?
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Listeners could be used for other things: not only injecting
dependencies. The interface would mark classes that could be
instantiated by wicket listeners. But yes you are probably right and
it would be overkilling...
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Again, how would merely putting a marker interface on some random
class allow Wicket to be notified about when it is instantiated? Now,
if you bring AspectJ into the mix, you might have something. Or, as
someone else already suggested, use Salve.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Listeners could be used for other things: not only injecting
dependencies. The interface would mark classes that could be
instantiated by wicket listeners. But yes you are probably right and
it would be overkilling...
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
Doing
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
as component does?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Again, how would merely putting a marker interface on some random
class allow Wicket to be notified about when it is instantiated? Now,
if you bring AspectJ into the mix, you might have something. Or, as
someone else already suggested, use Salve.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Listeners could be used for other things: not only injecting
dependencies. The interface would mark classes that could be
instantiated by wicket listeners. But yes you are probably right and
it would be overkilling...
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: using IOC in panels?
I meant automatically. Why introduce an interface if you're going to
just do this anyway?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Doing
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
as component does?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Again, how would merely putting a marker interface on some random
class allow Wicket to be notified about when it is instantiated? Now,
if you bring AspectJ into the mix, you might have something. Or, as
someone else already suggested, use Salve.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Listeners could be used for other things: not only injecting
dependencies. The interface would mark classes that could be
instantiated by wicket listeners. But yes you are probably right and
it would be overkilling...
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method is
called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class
call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
I'm not sure why the children disappear but it looks odd to me to save
component in the session in first place.
why not:
if (request.getParameter(editMode)) { label = new AjaxEditableLabel(id,
model);} else {label = new Label(id, model);}
parent.addOrReplace(label);
?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mihai Postelnicu
mposteln...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Guys,
I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator
with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your time !
Mihai
On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need
to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for
translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to be
replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job
easier.
The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the
AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change visibility
modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by implementing
an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So my
AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request arrives.
I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the session
on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I fetch
the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the
Label and TextField) are gone.
Any ideas will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's
children disappear.
I do the save like this:
session.bind();
session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component);
Regards,
Alexandru
Re: using IOC in panels?
Good point.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant automatically. Why introduce an interface if you're going to
just do this anyway?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Doing
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
as component does?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Again, how would merely putting a marker interface on some random
class allow Wicket to be notified about when it is instantiated? Now,
if you bring AspectJ into the mix, you might have something. Or, as
someone else already suggested, use Salve.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Listeners could be used for other things: not only injecting
dependencies. The interface would mark classes that could be
instantiated by wicket listeners. But yes you are probably right and
it would be overkilling...
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant the Instantiatable interface you mentioned. I would assume
that it would be a marker interface that would indicate to Wicket that
you want it injected. This already happens with @SpringBean without
the need for an interface. If the injector sees a @SpringBean field,
it injects it. For other classes (like models and the like), if you
have a superclass that injects in its constructor, you're covered.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
The interface IComponentInstantiationListener is tied to component:
public interface IComponentInstantiationListener
{
/**
* Called for every component that is instantiated. This method
is called
* strongduring/strong construction, so do not depend on the
construction being completed
* yet. The id is guaranteed to be set before this call.
*
* @param component
* the component that is being instantiated.
*/
void onInstantiation(Component component);
}
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
So, why would you need an interface, then? Just do this.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you could have your hierarchy of classes and on your base class
call
getApplication().notifyComponentInstantiationListeners(this);
As component does.
Ernesto
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:11 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
So that other classes could use the same trick by implementing
IInstantiable ?
How, exactly, is Wicket going to know when they're instantiated? The
only way the component instantiation stuff works is that the Component
constructor does the notification.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
Hello,
This aproach didn't work for me. I tried first only adding an
AjaxEditableLabel in my ComponentResolver, but once I clicked the label
(in order to change into an edit box) wicket complained that it couldn't
find the AjaxEditableLabel component in the Page. So that's how I ended
up overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget in order to resolve the
AjaxEditableLabel. I couldn't return a new instance of it (because
adding it to the page at this point seems difficult) so I thought to use
the session.
Our intended translation tag looks like this: wicket:translation
key=home:nameField[Here the default value for
it]/wicket:translation. We need something like this because we are
porting an existing webapp to Wicket that has a similar mechanism now.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 02:07 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I'm not sure why the children disappear but it looks odd to me to save
component in the session in first place.
why not:
if (request.getParameter(editMode)) { label = new AjaxEditableLabel(id,
model);} else {label = new Label(id, model);}
parent.addOrReplace(label);
?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mihai Postelnicu
mposteln...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Guys,
I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator
with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your time !
Mihai
On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need
to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for
translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to be
replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job
easier.
The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the
AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change visibility
modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by implementing
an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So my
AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request arrives.
I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the session
on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I fetch
the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the
Label and TextField) are gone.
Any ideas will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's
children disappear.
I do the save like this:
session.bind();
session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component);
Regards,
Alexandru
Re: onload
Hi,
2010/9/23 Ole Hansen ssej1...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Why do you have two components on bodyElement ?
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
Yes it is redundant, but dosent seem to make a difference weather it
is there or not.
No need to look further into this. I messed up.
Thanks,
Jess
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Ole Hansen ssej1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Newbee question: I need to add the onload attribute to the body tag (I
can't use other methods to accomplish the same thing...)
My html:
html
wicket:head
...
/wicket:head
wicket:extend
body wicket:id=bodyElement
...
/body
/wicket:extend
/html
Java:
WebMarkupContainer body = new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bodyElement) {
�...@override
public boolean isTransparentResolver() {
return true;
}
�...@override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put(onload, onload(););
}
});
Result html:
html
head
...
/head
body
body onload=onload();
...
I now have two body start tags.
The code below results in a runtime exception stating that bodyElement
was not declared..
body wicket:id=bodyElement
wicket:extend
...
/wicket:extend
/body
/html
I have also tried adding:
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(onload();),
this));
But nothing gets added to the body tag.
Can someone direct me in the right direction?
Wicket version: 1.4.1
JDK: IBM JDK 5.0.10
Regards,
Jess
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
The Long, Long Dependency Trail
Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. --- Test set: net.neocortext.web.TestHomePage --- Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.225 sec FAILURE! testRenderMyPage(net.neocortext.web.TestHomePage) Time elapsed: 0.182 sec ERROR! java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/hibernate/annotations/common/reflection/MetadataProvider at net.databinder.hib.DataApplication.buildHibernateSessionFactory(DataApplication.java:88) at net.databinder.hib.DataApplication.dataInit(DataApplication.java:56) at net.databinder.DataApplicationBase.internalInit(DataApplicationBase.java:54) at net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication.internalInit(AuthDataApplication.java:74) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.init(WicketFilter.java:721) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.MockWebApplication.init(MockWebApplication.java:168) at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.BaseWicketTester.init(BaseWicketTester.java:218) at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.init(WicketTester.java:331) at org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.init(WicketTester.java:314) at net.neocortext.web.TestHomePage.setUp(TestHomePage.java:19) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:128) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:230) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:225) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute(JUnitTestSet.java:213) at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140) at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127) at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.hibernate.annotations.common.reflection.MetadataProvider at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at
Re: Saving a component in session
I guess you are aware of wicket:message key=.. ?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alexandru Artimon
aarti...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
This aproach didn't work for me. I tried first only adding an
AjaxEditableLabel in my ComponentResolver, but once I clicked the label (in
order to change into an edit box) wicket complained that it couldn't find
the AjaxEditableLabel component in the Page. So that's how I ended up
overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget in order to resolve the
AjaxEditableLabel. I couldn't return a new instance of it (because adding it
to the page at this point seems difficult) so I thought to use the session.
Our intended translation tag looks like this: wicket:translation
key=home:nameField[Here the default value for it]/wicket:translation.
We need something like this because we are porting an existing webapp to
Wicket that has a similar mechanism now.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 02:07 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I'm not sure why the children disappear but it looks odd to me to save
component in the session in first place.
why not:
if (request.getParameter(editMode)) { label = new AjaxEditableLabel(id,
model);} else {label = new Label(id, model);}
parent.addOrReplace(label);
?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mihai Postelnicu
mposteln...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Guys,
I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator
with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your time !
Mihai
On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need
to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for
translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to
be
replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job
easier.
The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the
AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change
visibility
modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by
implementing
an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So
my
AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request
arrives.
I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the
session
on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I
fetch
the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the
Label and TextField) are gone.
Any ideas will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's
children disappear.
I do the save like this:
session.bind();
session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component);
Regards,
Alexandru
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
I suggest you use hibernate 3.5+. it seems more organized adding hibernate-core , hibernate-annotations adds all the neccessary hibernate dependencies. I normally use hibernate JPA entity manager and all i add is one dependency for hibernate-entitymanager. Regards. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ichiro Furusato ichiro.furus...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
I've implemented a CheckGroupColumn which is supposed to easily extend
the DataTable with multi-row actions.
But when i add it to my DataTable i get the following exception:
---
WicketMessage: Component label must be applied to a tag of type
'input', not 'span wicket:id=label' (line 0, column 0)
[markup =
jar:file:/D:/work/base/LIB_POOL/wicket/wicket-extensions-1.4.9.jar!/org/apache/wicket/extensions/markup/html/repeater/data/table/HeadersToolbar.html
wicket:panel
tr class=headers
span wicket:id=headers
th wicket:id=headerspan
wicket:id=label[header-label]/span/th
/span
/tr
/wicket:panel, index = 6, current = 'span wicket:id=label' (line
21, column 27)]
---
I do understand whats wrong here, but i have no clue how to work a
round that problem. Any ideas?
Heres the CheckGroupColumn.java:
public class CheckGroupColumnT extends AbstractColumnT {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private CheckGroupT checkGroup;
public CheckGroupColumn(CheckGroupT checkGroup) {
super(new ModelString());
this.checkGroup = checkGroup;
}
@Override
public Component getHeader(String componentId) {
return new CheckGroupSelector(componentId, checkGroup);
}
@Override
public void populateItem(ItemICellPopulatorT cellItem, String
componentId, IModelT rowModel) {
cellItem.add(new CheckT(componentId, rowModel, checkGroup));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
More recent versions of hibernate are available in the JBoss maven repo (which I do not see in your pom.xml): repository idjboss/id urlhttps://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/url /repository Sebastian - Original Message - From: Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:44 PM Subject: Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail I suggest you use hibernate 3.5+. it seems more organized adding hibernate-core , hibernate-annotations adds all the neccessary hibernate dependencies. I normally use hibernate JPA entity manager and all i add is one dependency for hibernate-entitymanager. Regards. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ichiro Furusato ichiro.furus...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
I would not add those external repositories to your own pom, but rely on a repository manager instead to retrieve the dependencies. See: * artifactory * nexus * archiva Martijn On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl wrote: More recent versions of hibernate are available in the JBoss maven repo (which I do not see in your pom.xml): repository idjboss/id urlhttps://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/url /repository Sebastian - Original Message - From: Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:44 PM Subject: Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail I suggest you use hibernate 3.5+. it seems more organized adding hibernate-core , hibernate-annotations adds all the neccessary hibernate dependencies. I normally use hibernate JPA entity manager and all i add is one dependency for hibernate-entitymanager. Regards. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ichiro Furusato ichiro.furus...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
(Sorry for the topic hijacking Ichiro ...) Interesting tip, thanks! I've only been using maven for a year now, mainly by using m2eclipse to prevent library jars ending up in my source repository. Sebastian - Original Message - From: Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:49 PM Subject: Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail I would not add those external repositories to your own pom, but rely on a repository manager instead to retrieve the dependencies. See: * artifactory * nexus * archiva Martijn On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl wrote: More recent versions of hibernate are available in the JBoss maven repo (which I do not see in your pom.xml): repository idjboss/id urlhttps://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/url /repository Sebastian - Original Message - From: Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:44 PM Subject: Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail I suggest you use hibernate 3.5+. it seems more organized adding hibernate-core , hibernate-annotations adds all the neccessary hibernate dependencies. I normally use hibernate JPA entity manager and all i add is one dependency for hibernate-entitymanager. Regards. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ichiro Furusato ichiro.furus...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
Yeah it's not what we need, that's why we are implementing some other.
And also wicket:message doesn't have the ability to work in an
editor-mode.
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 03:34 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I guess you are aware ofwicket:message key=.. ?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alexandru Artimon
aarti...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
This aproach didn't work for me. I tried first only adding an
AjaxEditableLabel in my ComponentResolver, but once I clicked the label (in
order to change into an edit box) wicket complained that it couldn't find
the AjaxEditableLabel component in the Page. So that's how I ended up
overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget in order to resolve the
AjaxEditableLabel. I couldn't return a new instance of it (because adding it
to the page at this point seems difficult) so I thought to use the session.
Our intended translation tag looks like this:wicket:translation
key=home:nameField[Here the default value for it]/wicket:translation.
We need something like this because we are porting an existing webapp to
Wicket that has a similar mechanism now.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 02:07 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I'm not sure why the children disappear but it looks odd to me to save
component in the session in first place.
why not:
if (request.getParameter(editMode)) { label = new AjaxEditableLabel(id,
model);} else {label = new Label(id, model);}
parent.addOrReplace(label);
?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mihai Postelnicu
mposteln...@dgfoundation.org wrote:
Guys,
I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator
with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your time !
Mihai
On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need
to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for
translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to
be
replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job
easier.
The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the
AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change
visibility
modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by
implementing
an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So
my
AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request
arrives.
I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the
session
on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I
fetch
the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the
Label and TextField) are gone.
Any ideas will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's
children disappear.
I do the save like this:
session.bind();
session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component);
Regards,
Alexandru
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
On 09/23/10 14:28, Ichiro Furusato wrote:
Hello,
I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were
moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and
Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I
seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and
manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so,
well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again.
This will probably only apply to smaller projects, but I'd like to offer
my experience as an example. I recently made a Wicket app with JPA,
Hibernate, and Jetty not using any dependency manager at all. I
downloaded the Jars from each project's website, put them into lib/, and
made a very small Ant build.xml containing
path id=compile.classpath
pathelement path=${build.home}/
fileset dir=./lib
include name=*.jar/
/fileset
pathelement path=${classpath}/
/path
It worked without problems. Sometimes simple is better. Of course, if
you need a ton of other libraries, it may get too complicated.
-- Thomas
--
---
Thomas Kapplerthomas.kapp...@isb-sib.ch
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Tel: +41 22 379 51 89
CMU, rue Michel Servet 1
1211 Geneve 4
Switzerland http://www.uniprot.org
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: noob question
sonoerin humblecelt at yahoo.com writes: customerA.domain.com customerB.domain.com So I am not sure if its best to just have multiple deployments each with their own Wicket Application/homepage or if there is a way to bundle them all into a single app that handles each request/response based upon url (for example). Hi sonoerin! It all depends on how your websites should interact with each other. If they are completely independent you should keep a wicket Application/homepage for each website. On the other hand if you websites should interact with each others, a common wicket Application could be a better choice. So if your websites should exchange some kind of session data (ex: user credentials) you should consider to bundle them into a single application and map each website on a different URL. However I don't know if Wicket let you map an application on different URL, maybe you should work on web server configuration. Bye! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
If you want to stick with Ant, try Ivy instead of Maven. It can read Maven pom files, and has a decent eclipse plug-in. On Sep 23, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Ichiro Furusato wrote: . I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
In short, i want to add a CheckGroupSelector instead of a Label. So i guess i need a way to replace the markup of HeaderToolbar, without rewriting the whole thing. Suggestions? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
Yes, you'll need to provide your own markup.
MyToolbar extends HeaderToolbar {
// override the constroctor only
}
then provide MyToolbar.html which is modified version of HeaderToolbar.html
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Benedikt Schlegel
codecab.dri...@googlemail.com wrote:
In short, i want to add a CheckGroupSelector instead of a Label.
So i guess i need a way to replace the markup of HeaderToolbar,
without rewriting the whole thing.
Suggestions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
Well... most of the logic is in the constructor. So i have to copy the
whole code from there and just make some little tweaks.
Kinda ugly but now i realized that theres no other way. What a pity!
Thanks anyway.
2010/9/23 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org:
Yes, you'll need to provide your own markup.
MyToolbar extends HeaderToolbar {
// override the constroctor only
}
then provide MyToolbar.html which is modified version of HeaderToolbar.html
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Benedikt Schlegel
codecab.dri...@googlemail.com wrote:
In short, i want to add a CheckGroupSelector instead of a Label.
So i guess i need a way to replace the markup of HeaderToolbar,
without rewriting the whole thing.
Suggestions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
instead of adding the checkbox directly wrap it in a panel. -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Benedikt Schlegel codecab.dri...@googlemail.com wrote: In short, i want to add a CheckGroupSelector instead of a Label. So i guess i need a way to replace the markup of HeaderToolbar, without rewriting the whole thing. Suggestions? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: HeadersToolbar incompatible to other components than Label?
Works fine. Thanks a lot! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
Does anybody have a suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Shelli
-Original Message-
From: Shelli Orton
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:54 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
Hi,
I am trying to use a CheckGroup to manage which columns are used in a
datatable. I've set up my columns as per the code below. The
getColumnCheckBoxes method creates the check boxes that will be part of
the group. The getDefaultColumns defines which columns should be
checked by default. The default columns are being set, but the boxes
are not being displayed as checked when the page is first loaded.
However, the correct columns are being displayed in the datatable, so
they are being set behind the scenes.
How do I get them to display as checked on page load?
Thanks in advance!
Shelli
CODE:
public class HomePage extends WebPage
{
StringResourceModel columnA = new StringResourceModel(columnA,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnB = new StringResourceModel(columnB,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnC = new StringResourceModel(columnC,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnD = new StringResourceModel(columnD,
this,
null);
ArrayListSelectOption columnCheckBoxes = null;
CheckGroupSelectOption columnCheckGroup = new
CheckGroupSelectOption(columnCheckGroup,
new ArrayListSelectOption());
@SuppressWarnings(rawtypes)
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
/**
* Constructor that is invoked when page is invoked without a
session.
*
* @param parameters Page parameters
*/
@SuppressWarnings(rawtypes)
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
@SuppressWarnings(serial)
Form queryForm = new Form(queryForm)
{
@Override
protected void onSubmit()
{
// do stuff
}
};
add(queryForm);
// Create column selection boxes
columnCheckGroup.add(new
CheckGroupSelector(columnCheckGroupSelector));
@SuppressWarnings({ unchecked, serial })
ListView checkBoxes = new ListView(columnCheckGroup,
getColumnCheckBoxes())
{
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Check(columnCheckbox, item.getModel()));
item.add(new Label(displayValue,
new PropertyModel(item.getModel(),
displayValue)));
}
};
if (columnCheckGroup.getModelObject().isEmpty())
{
columnCheckGroup.setModelObject(this.getDefaultColumns());
}
columnCheckGroup.add(checkBoxes);
queryForm.add(columnCheckGroup);
// more init stuff...
}
public ArrayListSelectOption getColumnCheckBoxes()
{
if (columnCheckBoxes == null)
{
columnCheckBoxes = new ArrayListSelectOption();
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnC,
this.columnC.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnD,
this.columnD.getObject()));
}
return columnCheckBoxes;
}
/*
By default, columns A and B are selected
*/
private ArrayListSelectOption getDefaultColumns()
{
ArrayListSelectOption defaultColumns = new
ArrayListSelectOption();
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
return defaultColumns;
}
class SelectOption implements Serializable
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private String propertyValue;
private String displayValue;
/**
* Utility class for storing property and display values for
option
* widgets (e.g. drop down lists, check boxes).
*/
public SelectOption(String propertyValue, String displayValue)
{
this.propertyValue = propertyValue;
this.displayValue = displayValue;
}
// getters/setters
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
if I where you i'd go use one of the legup archetypes or wicket stuff iolite (although a bit outdated) and build on those, they provide the boilder plate so you dont have to write it. Use a artifact manager like nexus or artifactory.. As for the rest of it, I wrote an article here : http://ninomartinez.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/building-software-cheat-sheet/ 2010/9/23 Ichiro Furusato ichiro.furus...@gmail.com: Hello, I've been working with Wicket for about a week now and things were moving along all cruisy until I started adding Hibernate and Databinder dependencies into my POM. Then all hell broke loose and I seem to now find myself in the NoClassDefFoundError, then find and manually install jar cycle. I mean, things with Wicket were just so, well, SENSIBLE, and now I'm back in nightmare-programming-land again. In looking at some of the examples on the Web that combine Wicket and Hibernate, they don't seem to be needing anywhere near the number of dependencies I am now adding. I'm guessing I must be doing something wrong, as I'm still pretty new to Maven, being a longstanding Ant person. That I've had to manually install a whole bunch (6) of jars seems a clue. Part of this may be due to the folks who wrote Databinder using git rather than a maven repository (why oh why?!). My application extends net.databinder.auth.hib.AuthDataApplication so that it can be an authenticating database application. I've attached both the latest stack trace and my pom.xml file in hopes that some kind soul can tell me where I've gone terribly wrong. Perhaps I'm almost at the end of the dependency tunnel but I'm not yet seeing any light yet. I'm guessing this is probably a blaringly obvious problem, or maybe not a problem at all and I'm almost there. Thanks very much, Ichiro PS. BTW, I'm really enjoying Wicket so far; I haven't had this much fun programming since HyperCard. I hope it's not significantly more complicated a year or two from now than it is now. If the developer team can keep to that ethos of simplicity Wicket will only gain in popularity. Avoid the bloat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
im going to guess something is wrong with your model. hard to tell
without a quickstart.
-igor
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Shelli Orton shelli.or...@sjrb.ca wrote:
Does anybody have a suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Shelli
-Original Message-
From: Shelli Orton
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:54 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
Hi,
I am trying to use a CheckGroup to manage which columns are used in a
datatable. I've set up my columns as per the code below. The
getColumnCheckBoxes method creates the check boxes that will be part of
the group. The getDefaultColumns defines which columns should be
checked by default. The default columns are being set, but the boxes
are not being displayed as checked when the page is first loaded.
However, the correct columns are being displayed in the datatable, so
they are being set behind the scenes.
How do I get them to display as checked on page load?
Thanks in advance!
Shelli
CODE:
public class HomePage extends WebPage
{
StringResourceModel columnA = new StringResourceModel(columnA,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnB = new StringResourceModel(columnB,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnC = new StringResourceModel(columnC,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnD = new StringResourceModel(columnD,
this,
null);
ArrayListSelectOption columnCheckBoxes = null;
CheckGroupSelectOption columnCheckGroup = new
CheckGroupSelectOption(columnCheckGroup,
new ArrayListSelectOption());
�...@suppresswarnings(rawtypes)
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
/**
* Constructor that is invoked when page is invoked without a
session.
*
* @param parameters Page parameters
*/
�...@suppresswarnings(rawtypes)
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
�...@suppresswarnings(serial)
Form queryForm = new Form(queryForm)
{
�...@override
protected void onSubmit()
{
// do stuff
}
};
add(queryForm);
// Create column selection boxes
columnCheckGroup.add(new
CheckGroupSelector(columnCheckGroupSelector));
�...@suppresswarnings({ unchecked, serial })
ListView checkBoxes = new ListView(columnCheckGroup,
getColumnCheckBoxes())
{
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Check(columnCheckbox, item.getModel()));
item.add(new Label(displayValue,
new PropertyModel(item.getModel(),
displayValue)));
}
};
if (columnCheckGroup.getModelObject().isEmpty())
{
columnCheckGroup.setModelObject(this.getDefaultColumns());
}
columnCheckGroup.add(checkBoxes);
queryForm.add(columnCheckGroup);
// more init stuff...
}
public ArrayListSelectOption getColumnCheckBoxes()
{
if (columnCheckBoxes == null)
{
columnCheckBoxes = new ArrayListSelectOption();
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnC,
this.columnC.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnD,
this.columnD.getObject()));
}
return columnCheckBoxes;
}
/*
By default, columns A and B are selected
*/
private ArrayListSelectOption getDefaultColumns()
{
ArrayListSelectOption defaultColumns = new
ArrayListSelectOption();
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
return defaultColumns;
}
class SelectOption implements Serializable
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private String propertyValue;
private String displayValue;
/**
* Utility class for storing property and display values for
option
* widgets (e.g. drop down lists, check boxes).
*/
public SelectOption(String propertyValue, String displayValue)
{
this.propertyValue = propertyValue;
this.displayValue = displayValue;
}
// getters/setters
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
RE: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
What do you mean by quickstart?
Shelli
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:57 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
im going to guess something is wrong with your model. hard to tell
without a quickstart.
-igor
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Shelli Orton shelli.or...@sjrb.ca wrote:
Does anybody have a suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Shelli
-Original Message-
From: Shelli Orton
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:54 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
Hi,
I am trying to use a CheckGroup to manage which columns are used in a
datatable. I've set up my columns as per the code below. The
getColumnCheckBoxes method creates the check boxes that will be part of
the group. The getDefaultColumns defines which columns should be
checked by default. The default columns are being set, but the boxes
are not being displayed as checked when the page is first loaded.
However, the correct columns are being displayed in the datatable, so
they are being set behind the scenes.
How do I get them to display as checked on page load?
Thanks in advance!
Shelli
CODE:
public class HomePage extends WebPage
{
StringResourceModel columnA = new StringResourceModel(columnA,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnB = new StringResourceModel(columnB,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnC = new StringResourceModel(columnC,
this,
null);
StringResourceModel columnD = new StringResourceModel(columnD,
this,
null);
ArrayListSelectOption columnCheckBoxes = null;
CheckGroupSelectOption columnCheckGroup = new
CheckGroupSelectOption(columnCheckGroup,
new ArrayListSelectOption());
�...@suppresswarnings(rawtypes)
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
/**
* Constructor that is invoked when page is invoked without a
session.
*
* @param parameters Page parameters
*/
�...@suppresswarnings(rawtypes)
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
�...@suppresswarnings(serial)
Form queryForm = new Form(queryForm)
{
�...@override
protected void onSubmit()
{
// do stuff
}
};
add(queryForm);
// Create column selection boxes
columnCheckGroup.add(new
CheckGroupSelector(columnCheckGroupSelector));
�...@suppresswarnings({ unchecked, serial })
ListView checkBoxes = new ListView(columnCheckGroup,
getColumnCheckBoxes())
{
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Check(columnCheckbox, item.getModel()));
item.add(new Label(displayValue,
new PropertyModel(item.getModel(),
displayValue)));
}
};
if (columnCheckGroup.getModelObject().isEmpty())
{
columnCheckGroup.setModelObject(this.getDefaultColumns());
}
columnCheckGroup.add(checkBoxes);
queryForm.add(columnCheckGroup);
// more init stuff...
}
public ArrayListSelectOption getColumnCheckBoxes()
{
if (columnCheckBoxes == null)
{
columnCheckBoxes = new ArrayListSelectOption();
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnC,
this.columnC.getObject()));
columnCheckBoxes.add(new SelectOption(columnD,
this.columnD.getObject()));
}
return columnCheckBoxes;
}
/*
By default, columns A and B are selected
*/
private ArrayListSelectOption getDefaultColumns()
{
ArrayListSelectOption defaultColumns = new
ArrayListSelectOption();
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnA,
this.columnA.getObject()));
defaultColumns.add(new SelectOption(columnB,
this.columnB.getObject()));
return defaultColumns;
}
class SelectOption implements Serializable
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private String propertyValue;
private String displayValue;
/**
* Utility class for storing property and display values for
option
* widgets (e.g. drop down lists, check boxes).
*/
public SelectOption(String propertyValue, String displayValue)
{
this.propertyValue = propertyValue;
this.displayValue = displayValue;
}
// getters/setters
}
}
-
Re: StackOverFlowError
Hey guys, We overwrote IObjectStreamFactory with a copy that has more logging and we found the object that is causing the problems in our production logs. Now we need to recreate it in a more controlled environment. How could we force serialization of this object in a dev environmental? D/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Petersson andr...@petersson.atwrote: i had a very similar problem occuring in production when where was a cluster failover. i could never reproduce it. did something strange happen to you like, the filesystem was partially wiped during writing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StackOverFlowError
in dev serialization should happen just like in production. -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: Hey guys, We overwrote IObjectStreamFactory with a copy that has more logging and we found the object that is causing the problems in our production logs. Now we need to recreate it in a more controlled environment. How could we force serialization of this object in a dev environmental? D/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Petersson andr...@petersson.atwrote: i had a very similar problem occuring in production when where was a cluster failover. i could never reproduce it. did something strange happen to you like, the filesystem was partially wiped during writing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup
See http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html Use this to create a small application that exhibits the bug. Regards, Erik. Op 23-09-10 19:26, Shelli Orton schreef: What do you mean by quickstart? Shelli -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:57 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Setting Checked Boxes in CheckGroup im going to guess something is wrong with your model. hard to tell without a quickstart. -igor -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StackOverFlowError
When exactly does a page get serialized/serialized? On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: in dev serialization should happen just like in production. -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: Hey guys, We overwrote IObjectStreamFactory with a copy that has more logging and we found the object that is causing the problems in our production logs. Now we need to recreate it in a more controlled environment. How could we force serialization of this object in a dev environmental? D/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Petersson andr...@petersson.at wrote: i had a very similar problem occuring in production when where was a cluster failover. i could never reproduce it. did something strange happen to you like, the filesystem was partially wiped during writing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Job opportunity in Tahiti
Our team is developing a new application using the following technologies : -Wicket -Hibernate -Portlet -Liferay So we are looking for a Java developer for 6 month. The project starts in October. You must at least be skilled in Java and Wicket. We will teach you the other technologies if needed. Our company has been using Java for 6 years and Wicket for 3 years now. As we are located in Tahiti, French Polynesia, you have to be fluent in French and allowed to work here (French or European citizen). Feel free to have a look at our web site : http://www.piti.pf www.piti.pf . Please, don't hesitate to PM me if you are interested. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Job-opportunity-in-Tahiti-tp2552526p2552526.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StackOverFlowError
at the end of request -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: When exactly does a page get serialized/serialized? On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: in dev serialization should happen just like in production. -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: Hey guys, We overwrote IObjectStreamFactory with a copy that has more logging and we found the object that is causing the problems in our production logs. Now we need to recreate it in a more controlled environment. How could we force serialization of this object in a dev environmental? D/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Petersson andr...@petersson.at wrote: i had a very similar problem occuring in production when where was a cluster failover. i could never reproduce it. did something strange happen to you like, the filesystem was partially wiped during writing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Saving a component in session
You really don't want to save a component in a session. A component has its own lifecycle, tied to pagerequests, and its own scope tied to its parent components and the page it is part of. From what I understand of your story, what you should do is write your own component that wraps a Label or an AjaxEditLabel depending on some condition/mode. This is very easy to make with wicket. On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:24 +0300, Mihai Postelnicu mposteln...@dgfoundation.org wrote: Guys, I work on the same project as below (integrating an interface translator with Wicket) and we are a bit stuck. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for your time ! Mihai On 09/23/2010 12:29 PM, Alexandru Artimon wrote: Forgot to mention that the component is an AjaxEditableLabel and I need to save it to session because I'm creating a custom wicket tag for translation purposes. When in translator mode I want all the labels to be replaced by AjaxEditableLabel's so that the translator can do his job easier. The problem I have is that when I click on the label of the AjaxEditableLabel, it produces an ajax request in order to change visibility modes and show the edit box. I did my custom tag replacing by implementing an IComponentResolver, which (from what I figured) happens on render. So my AjaxEditableLabel component isn't in the page when the Ajax request arrives. I planned to solve this by fetching the missing component from the session on my own, by overwriting resolveListenerInterfaceTarget. Now when I fetch the original AjaxEditableLabel from the session, all it's children (the Label and TextField) are gone. Any ideas will be much appreciated. Thanks, Alexandru On 09/23/2010 11:57 AM, Alexandru Artimon wrote: Hello, I have a problem when saving a component to the session, all it's children disappear. I do the save like this: session.bind(); session.setMetaData(MY_KEY, component); Regards, Alexandru - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StackOverFlowError
Hello, Pages are serialized at the end of the request cycle (this includes at the end of ajax requests) Look at AbstractPageStore.serializePage(...) Specificically the call to Objects.objectToByteArray(page.getPageMapEntry()) which turns the page into a bytearray. http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.wicket/wicket/1.4.10/org/apache/wicket/protocol/http/pagestore/AbstractPageStore.java#AbstractPageStore.serializePage%28org.apache.wicket.Page%29 Regards, Mike When exactly does a page get serialized/serialized? On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Igor Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: in dev serialization should happen just like in production. -igor On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: Hey guys, We overwrote IObjectStreamFactory with a copy that has more logging and we found the object that is causing the problems in our production logs. Now we need to recreate it in a more controlled environment. How could we force serialization of this object in a dev environmental? D/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Peterssonandr...@petersson.at wrote: i had a very similar problem occuring in production when where was a cluster failover. i could never reproduce it. did something strange happen to you like, the filesystem was partially wiped during writing? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Removing jsessionid from URl
Hi, check this http://markmail.org/thread/u42f6idu2hsdulom 2010/9/22 Ayodeji Aladejebi aladej...@gmail.com Hi, I have been tryin to figure out what to do to remove jsessionid from the URL I have mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/home, AppHomePage.class)); All my links are BookmarkablePageLinks. am using wicket 1.4.8 on Apache Tomcat/6.0.29 -- S pozdravem Vojtěch Krása
Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?
Take a look at http://www.richardnichols.net/2010/03/apache-wicket-force-page-reload-to-fix-ajax-back/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Ryan Crumley crum...@gmail.com wrote: All, I ran into strange behavior involving wicket ajax updates + chrome + back button. I am pretty sure the issue is not caused by wicket but I am hoping the problem might sound familiar to someone and they can point me in the right direction. The scenario goes like this: - An ajax request is made that updates the DOM. - The user navigates to another page by clicking on a link. - The user uses the browser back button to go back to the original page. After clicking back Google Chrome shows the page as it was originally rendered (before the DOM update). All other browsers show the page as it was when the user left the page (with the DOM update). Besides the possibility of showing stale data the other problem is that the page state has been altered by the ajax request and links that were originally rendered may no longer be valid. I found a few links where people are having similar issues: http://www.maintaino.com/nuts-and-bolts/2010/04/08/teaching-chrome-not-to-cache-your-rails-pages/ Possibly related to using jQuery and/or window.onUnload() and bfcache: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/158319/cross-browser-onload-event-and-the-back-button https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Using_Firefox_1.5_caching In addition to using Wicket 1.4.12 I am also using jQuery 1.4.2 and google analytics on these pages. I don't think any unload handlers have been added however my only check was looking at all the attributes on the window object via the inspector. Has anyone else seen similar behavior? Even better, anyone else have a solution? You may be seeing errors like this one in your logs: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component wid1:wid2:1:wid3 not found on page com.foo.xxx Thanks! Ryan -- Richard Nichols http://www.richardnichols.net/ :: http://onmydoorstep.com.au/
Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = proble m?
Doesn't it make more sense to override WebPage's setHeaders(WebResponse) method? You get the response as a param instead of pulling it from the request cycle and the method name is just right. _ From: Richard Nichols [mailto:r...@visural.com] To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:47:24 -0400 Subject: Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem? Take a look at http://www.richardnichols.net/2010/03/apache-wicket-force-page-reload-to-fix-ajax-back/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Ryan Crumley crum...@gmail.com wrote: All, I ran into strange behavior involving wicket ajax updates + chrome + back button. I am pretty sure the issue is not caused by wicket but I am hoping the problem might sound familiar to someone and they can point me in the right direction. The scenario goes like this: - An ajax request is made that updates the DOM. - The user navigates to another page by clicking on a link. - The user uses the browser back button to go back to the original page. After clicking back Google Chrome shows the page as it was originally rendered (before the DOM update). All other browsers show the page as it was when the user left the page (with the DOM update). Besides the possibility of showing stale data the other problem is that the page state has been altered by the ajax request and links that were originally rendered may no longer be valid. I found a few links where people are having similar issues: http://www.maintaino.com/nuts-and-bolts/2010/04/08/teaching-chrome-not-to-cache-your-rails-pages/ Possibly related to using jQuery and/or window.onUnload() and bfcache: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/158319/cross-browser-onload-event-and-the-back-button https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Using_Firefox_1.5_caching In addition to using Wicket 1.4.12 I am also using jQuery 1.4.2 and google analytics on these pages. I don't think any unload handlers have been added however my only check was looking at all the attributes on the window object via the inspector. Has anyone else seen similar behavior? Even better, anyone else have a solution? You may be seeing errors like this one in your logs: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component wid1:wid2:1:wid3 not found on page com.foo.xxx Thanks! Ryan -- Richard Nichols http://www.richardnichols.net/ :: http://onmydoorstep.com.au/
Re: The Long, Long Dependency Trail
Thanks very much all for your helpful replies. I'll try to answer all at once: Josh, I'm using Hibernate 3.5.6-Final. I'm going to clean out my .m2 repository of the Hibernate stuff, then try Bas' suggestion and see if it works without me having to manually install the jars to my local repository as I've done. Martijn, that sounds like a good suggestion in a sense, but I'm honestly trying to keep things as simple as possible (for future maintainability given I might not be the one working on this project next year), so hopefully I'll be able to get a pom.xml file together that does everything necessary without needing any local manager. But that's a good idea for my own stuff (i.e., at home) so I might give that a try. Thanks. Sebastian, just yesterday I tried letting Eclipse manage my dependencies using Maven (since this project uses Maven) and it seems sensible enough, just a different process and place to look to manage my external libraries. Thomas, prior to this project I used Ant exclusively, so that kind of thing is certainly the way to go, and it scales fine to lots of jars. You can get pretty tricky with Ant, and it's great for managing the jar/war metadata, signing jars, etc., lots of things I don't know how to do in Maven (assuming they call can be done -- this remains to be seen). Don, I've been tempted to looking into Ivy for a long time, and if it weren't for the fact that the Wicket project seems pretty Maven-centric (even acknowledging that they state that Maven is not strictly required), I'd probaby go back to Ant and use Ivy for my dependencies. I still may in the end. As I mentioned above, there's things I know how to do in Ant that I may want to accomplish without having to learn how in Maven. I still think Ant is pretty amazing really. With Ivy it might be a complete solution for me (I'm not one to use new software just because it's a popular fad, unless it's actually an improvement over what I'm already doing). Finally, thanks Nino, it turns out that I actually did use an archetype to generate the beginnings of this project, which is certainly one thing in Maven I do like. Postscript: I added the maven repository as suggested by Bas, backed all the Databinder stuff back to 1.3.0 so that I didn't need the SNAPSHOTs (and thereby fixed a bug due to a class that is no longer used), and stopped trying to use AuthDataApplication as my base class (using just DataApplication) since I'm using wicket-auth-roles and already had my own role-based auth classes in place. So now it works and has Hibernate and Databinder in the app. Next step: start building the database classes. Thanks all, this was very helpful. Ichiro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Making a DecoratedButton; Need to pre-fix/post-fix div tag around the button component
Hi Guys, I am trying to make a reusable DecoratedButton component (extension of wicket Button), which would draw itself with appropriate icon, color, and other styles, based on the provided ButtonType, an enum e.g. 'Save', 'Edit', 'Delete', 'Search', 'Cancel' etc... I am trying to find solution to; how to encapsulate the html (associated with the button) in the form of wicket component to get the desired look feel. The html that represents the button is as below: div class=buttons button type=submit ./resources/Save.png Save /button /div The html-button as you see above is encapsulated in a 'div' tag. The Button component (DecoratedButton) I am making, I want the user to use the html button tag to attach the component to (instead of using div which is the container tag in my implementation), as that is only intuitive, when using a Button component. Ok, so here is my question, how can i prefix/post-fix div tag or any other tag, around the html button tag to which the new DecoratedButton component will be attached to. I did think about the option of renaming the 'button' tag to 'div' using setName in OnComponentTag() method, and than appending/injecting the remaining html within it (e.g. the Button itself). But than what if the user has any other behaviors/style/attributes attached to the button component, how would gather all those attributes from it to the new button tag html i inject with the div..? It doesn't seem like the right way to go ? Any ideas/thoughts ? Thanks in advance, Farhan. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Making-a-DecoratedButton-Need-to-pre-fix-post-fix-div-tag-around-the-button-component-tp2552950p2552950.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: announcing Granite - a Wicket-Scala-DB4O web application stack
Looks great, thanks for the link. +1 on CouchDB, et al vs only DB4o, Wicket+Scala+Couch is a really nice stack Thanks On 9/21/10 11:42 PM, Thomas Kappler wrote: On 09/22/10 03:41, Sam Stainsby wrote: Today we officially announced our project to provide a Wicket-DB4O-Scala web application stack: http://sustainablesoftware.com.au/blog/?p=77 I’m pleased to announce a new web application framework, called Granite, and an associated set of reusable libraries, called Uniscala. Please note that this is a work in progress: we are not announcing a release yet, or even a beta. A number people have started asking about the project, and so I felt it would be helpful to let the wider world know what is going on. Granite is a lightweight framework for the rapid development of web applications. It is based on the very cool and richly featured Apache Wicket web framework. Granite uses an embedded object database that avoids the need for SQL or Object-Relational Mappers (ORMs), and, in the Wicket tradition, is proud of, if not smug about, its distinct lack of external XML configuration files. Hey, I find that quite exciting. Now that you've done the hard work of fitting a non-relational store into a Wicket-based framework, do you think it would be hard to substitute other data stores such as Redis, CouchDB, BDB for DB4O? -- Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
