[vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2004-12-08 Thread Agustín Ciciliani
Hi,

First of all I apologise for posting a question that has been already 
discussed, but I
can't find any clues there to solve the problem.
As I could see it is a permissions issue...???
http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19534.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19681.html

I've installed simscan following step by step the README in
http://www.inter7.com/simscan/README

Everything looks to be alright, but when anybody tries to send an e-mail to my 
box it
anwers:
451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0). As an example:

mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
test
.
451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


If I erase the ,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan in my tcp.smtp everything 
works fine
(just to discard a qmail problem).

I'll appreciate any comment. Thanks in advance. Sincerely,

Agustín



Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-08 Thread Justin Heesemann
On Friday 03 December 2004 20:42, Oden Eriksson wrote:

 Thanks Jeremy, but smtp auth isn't the answer I was looking for. I
 know mr. sam and some other profilic people in this sphere thinks
 pop-before-smtp is dead, is silly and obsolete, but I can say it
 isn't.

just add a bogus account to vpopmail ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
works fine and shouldn't get you that much spam),  add it as a kmail 
pop3 account and switch on interval checking. or you could use the 
filter messages if they are greater than 1 bytes option in kmail for 
a pop3 account.

Or you could use the Precommand functionality of kmail and use 
something like fetchmail -c -s as you precommand line for your smtp 
transport.

 The question still, is how to make this work, not to make me start
 using smtp auth.

 If was really smart I would stop using an utterly dead (not developed
 since 1998), and unsupported software like qmail is and use _any_ of
 the others that is still alive, supported, developed and in much
 wider use.


Don't throw stones, when you're sitting in a glashouse. (German 
proverb) That's what smart people try to remember. :)

-- 
Mit internetten Grüßen / Best Regards
---
Justin Heesemannionium Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.ionium.org


Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2004-12-08 Thread Kareem Mahgoub
Hi there,
According to the author ( I have read somewhere), that this error due to
unexpected exit code of Spamassassin which is not understood by simscan.
I am not sure though.
If you were able to find a solution please tell me about it.
Best Regards,
Kareem Mahgoub
- Original Message - 
From: Agustn Ciciliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


 Hi,

 First of all I apologise for posting a question that has been already
discussed, but I
 can't find any clues there to solve the problem.
 As I could see it is a permissions issue...???
 http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19534.html
 http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19681.html

 I've installed simscan following step by step the README in
 http://www.inter7.com/simscan/README

 Everything looks to be alright, but when anybody tries to send an e-mail
to my box it
 anwers:
 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0). As an example:

 mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 250 ok
 rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 250 ok
 data
 354 go ahead
 test
 .
 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


 If I erase the ,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan in my tcp.smtp
everything works fine
 (just to discard a qmail problem).

 I'll appreciate any comment. Thanks in advance. Sincerely,

 Agustn





Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2004-12-08 Thread Agust?n Ciciliani
Dear Kareem,

Thanks for your answer!

I think it isn't the spamassassin because I've tried simscan without it (as it 
recommends
in http://qmailwiki.inter7.com/index.php?title=Simscan/Guide for the first try) 
but I got
the same error...

If I find the solution, I'll gladly tell you about it...

Agust?n


- Original Message - 
From: Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


 Hi there,
 According to the author ( I have read somewhere), that this error due to
 unexpected exit code of Spamassassin which is not understood by simscan.
 I am not sure though.
 If you were able to find a solution please tell me about it.
 Best Regards,
 Kareem Mahgoub
 - Original Message - 
 From: Agustn Ciciliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:21 PM
 Subject: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


  Hi,
 
  First of all I apologise for posting a question that has been already
 discussed, but I
  can't find any clues there to solve the problem.
  As I could see it is a permissions issue...???
  http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19534.html
  http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/msg19681.html
 
  I've installed simscan following step by step the README in
  http://www.inter7.com/simscan/README
 
  Everything looks to be alright, but when anybody tries to send an e-mail
 to my box it
  anwers:
  451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0). As an example:
 
  mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  250 ok
  rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  250 ok
  data
  354 go ahead
  test
  .
  451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)
 
 
  If I erase the ,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan in my tcp.smtp
 everything works fine
  (just to discard a qmail problem).
 
  I'll appreciate any comment. Thanks in advance. Sincerely,
 
  Agustn
 
 






Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2004-12-08 Thread Alastair Battrick
Agust?n Ciciliani wrote:
I think it isn't the spamassassin because I've tried simscan without it (as it 
recommends
in http://qmailwiki.inter7.com/index.php?title=Simscan/Guide for the first try) 
but I got
the same error...
Agustn
Did you try using SIMSCAN_DEBUG=2 ?
Make your SMTPd startup file to be something like this:
---
#!/bin/sh
SIMSCAN_DEBUG=2
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG
QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export QMAILQUEUE
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 20971520 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l $LOCAL -x 
/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp 
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/tru
e 21
---

Then restart qmail-smtpd and look in the qmail-smtpd log, or maybe the 
maillog, one or the other
--
Cheers
Alastair Battrick
www.battrick.org


[vchkpw] vchkpw fails and then succeeds!

2004-12-08 Thread Pedro Pais
When a user tries to authenticate itself, the first time vchkpw fails with:

Dec  6 21:50:08 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: password fail

but then it succeeds immediatly after:

Dec  6 21:50:13 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success

This is very annoying, besides the fact that this only happens with
Thunderbird, with other e-mail clients they give an error message and
the connection is terminated. Is there any way to solve this thing?

Oh.. and the greatest of all is that this only happens while
authenticating for smtp relay, POP3 and IMAP work out perfectly.

-- 
Pedro Pais
Skype name: pedro.pais
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Firefox! 
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesamp;id=3759amp;t=1


Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2004-12-08 Thread Agust?n Ciciliani
Dear Alastair,

Thank you very much for your help!

I tried SIMSCAN_DEBUG=2 in my qmail init script and the logs said the lines I'm 
sending
below.
When I installed simscan I used --disable-ripmime because clamav can scan mail 
messages,
but It seems that I must install ripmime anyway???
I'll test simscan with ripmime and after that I'll post another message telling 
how
everything goes.

Best regards,

Agust?n

Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.00 simscan: pelookup: called with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088906 simscan: pelookup: domain is
maderonet.net.ar
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088919 simscan: cdb looking up 
maderonet.net.ar
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088931 simscan: pelookup: local part is 
agustin
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088944 simscan: cdb looking up
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088957 simscan: pelookup: called with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088969 simscan: pelookup: domain is
maderonet.net.ar
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088982 simscan: cdb looking up 
maderonet.net.ar
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.088994 simscan: pelookup: local part is 
agustin
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.089007 simscan: cdb looking up
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.089676 simscan: ripmime error
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.089699 simscan: exit error code: 71
Dec  8 13:08:14 maria qmail: 1102522094.089838 1036  451 mail server 
temporarily rejected
message (#4.3.0)?



- Original Message - 
From: Alastair Battrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] 451 mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)


 Agust?n Ciciliani wrote:
  I think it isn't the spamassassin because I've tried simscan without it (as 
  it
recommends
  in http://qmailwiki.inter7.com/index.php?title=Simscan/Guide for the first 
  try) but I
got
  the same error...

 Agustn

 Did you try using SIMSCAN_DEBUG=2 ?

 Make your SMTPd startup file to be something like this:
 ---
 #!/bin/sh

 SIMSCAN_DEBUG=2
 export SIMSCAN_DEBUG

 QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 export QMAILQUEUE

 QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
 NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
 MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
 LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`

 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 20971520 \
  /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l $LOCAL -x
 /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \
  -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp
 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/tru
 e 21
 ---

 Then restart qmail-smtpd and look in the qmail-smtpd log, or maybe the
 maillog, one or the other
 -- 
 Cheers
 Alastair Battrick
 www.battrick.org





Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw fails and then succeeds!

2004-12-08 Thread Tom Collins
On Dec 8, 2004, at 8:04 AM, Pedro Pais wrote:
When a user tries to authenticate itself, the first time vchkpw fails 
with:

Dec  6 21:50:08 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: password fail
but then it succeeds immediatly after:
Dec  6 21:50:13 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success
This is very annoying, besides the fact that this only happens with
Thunderbird, with other e-mail clients they give an error message and
the connection is terminated. Is there any way to solve this thing?
It looks like the client is trying CRAM-MD5, failing, and then using 
PLAIN authentication.

You probably have an older patch, or a version problem between the 
smtp-auth patch and vpopmail.  The older patch sent the information in 
the incorrect order, and vpopmail was written to accept it in that 
order.  We fixed vpopmail for the 5.4.0 release, but it required 
updating to the correct SMTP AUTH patch.

If you're using vpopmail 5.4.0 and later, make sure you're using an 
up-to-date patch that passes the MD5 challenge and response in the 
correct order.  The patch in vpopmail's contrib directory works 
properly.

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/


Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-08 Thread X-Istence
On Dec 7, 2004, at 12:43 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
fredag 03 december 2004 21.27 skrev Tom Collins:
Is it possible to configure kmail to not keep a persistent IMAP
connection?  Can you add a bogus POP account to kmail so it's popping
into the server every 15 minutes?
It's not persistent. As a work around I guess I could pop it now and 
then to
still be a relay client.

Maybe it's just kmail that sucks and I'm barking at the wrong tree. No 
one
here uses this combo?

--
Regards // Oden Eriksson

Well, most people that are using Kmail plus courier use SMTP auth.
X-Istence


Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-08 Thread Mikael Fridh
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Friday 03 December 2004 18.10 Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
 

On Friday 03 December 2004 09:39 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
   

On Friday 03 December 2004 05:05 am, Oden Eriksson wrote:
 

In order to successfully send mail after the
--enable-relay-clear-minutes period has expired I have to restart
kmail. This is annoying and has been the case for a very long time now.
Now I'm sick of it and need a resolution. So please advise what to do.
   

Use smtp auth.  This is not a problem with kmail, courier-imap, or
roaming users.
 

oh and to add.
even if you do restart kmail, that doesn't necessarily mean it restarts the
kio_slave for your imap connection, therefore you may have to log
completely out :)  Simple fix: use smtp auth.
-Jeremy
   

Thanks Jeremy, but smtp auth isn't the answer I was looking for. I know mr. 
sam and some other profilic people in this sphere thinks pop-before-smtp is 
dead, is silly and obsolete, but I can say it isn't.

The question still, is how to make this work, not to make me start using smtp 
auth.

 

Of course pop-before-smtp is silly. Not supporting smtp auth is at the 
same time very silly.
What if all you want to do is send mail, without popping or imapping?

If was really smart I would stop using an utterly dead (not developed since 
1998), and unsupported software like qmail is and use _any_ of the others 
that is still alive, supported, developed and in much wider use.
 

I'm sorry you're not really smart. All I can tell you is I love qmail!
If qmail is utterly dead I'm a necrophiliac.
Yours truly,
Mikael


Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw fails and then succeeds!

2004-12-08 Thread Pedro Pais
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:39:35 -0800, Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Dec 8, 2004, at 8:04 AM, Pedro Pais wrote:
 
 
  When a user tries to authenticate itself, the first time vchkpw fails
  with:
 
  Dec  6 21:50:08 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: password fail
 
  but then it succeeds immediatly after:
 
  Dec  6 21:50:13 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success
 
  This is very annoying, besides the fact that this only happens with
  Thunderbird, with other e-mail clients they give an error message and
  the connection is terminated. Is there any way to solve this thing?
 
 It looks like the client is trying CRAM-MD5, failing, and then using
 PLAIN authentication.
 
 You probably have an older patch, or a version problem between the
 smtp-auth patch and vpopmail.  The older patch sent the information in
 the incorrect order, and vpopmail was written to accept it in that
 order.  We fixed vpopmail for the 5.4.0 release, but it required
 updating to the correct SMTP AUTH patch.
 
 If you're using vpopmail 5.4.0 and later, make sure you're using an
 up-to-date patch that passes the MD5 challenge and response in the
 correct order.  The patch in vpopmail's contrib directory works
 properly.
 
 --
 Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
 Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/
 
 
Thanks a lot for your tips, but it still doesn't work. :( I'm using
gentoo, that already has qmail way patches. I tried to compile it with
the patch in the contrib dir, and it worked out. But the result is
just the same.
But I guess you're totally right. I've tried more extensively and with
Outlook Express it doesn't give any error (I suppose OE doesn't use
CRAM-MD5).
I'm using vpopmail 5.4.6, and qmail is already patched with smtp auth,
but still nothing. Any thing else you can remember?

-- 
Pedro Pais
Skype name: pedro.pais
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Firefox! 
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesamp;id=3759amp;t=1


[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 released again - 2.0.8a

2004-12-08 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)



A damned typing error in chkuser.c gives compile error when #define
CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE is defined.
You may download 2.0.8a, or change, in chkuser.c, this line:

if (strùcasecmp(starting_string, ALWAYS) == 0) {
to

if (strcasecmp(starting_string, ALWAYS) == 0) {
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Tonino

chkuser 2.0.8 has been released,
and is available at

www.interazioni.it/opensource.
As usual, this version has been tested and is now working on my
production systems since some weeks.
This version, basically: 

freeze
all important changes in 2.0.7 (closing DB connections among all) 
is
more RFC compliant (NULL SENDER is now ALWAYS accepted, and all FORMAT
and MX checking defines are OFF by default) 
cleans
some small bugs. 
It has been released as complete release package, and as
update of previous installed versions (from 2.0.5 to
2.0.7).
Additional note:
I put on the site a small script displaying chkuser activity.
On one of my systems, I defined acceptance limits for existing (limit is
50) and wrong (limit is 5) users.
On that system, I'm facing each day several attacks, and these acceptance
limits help me rejecting them.
They are also suggesting me to implement additional features for
rejecting those IP.
Any comment on this topic is welcomed. 

qstat -yesterday 
CHKUSER entries 10135 
CHKUSER accepted null senders 365 
CHKUSER rejected senders 268 
CHKUSER accepted senders 3615 
CHKUSER rejected rcpts 966 
CHKUSER accepted rcpts 3809 
CHKUSER rejected relaying 88 
CHKUSER accepted relaying 42 
CHKUSER mbx overquota 0 
CHKUSER max rcpt intrusion triggers 0 
CHKUSER max wrong rcpt intrusion triggers 62 
CHKUSER rejected intrusions 920 
Please note I may answer any question until friday, then I'll be
again available at the end of the month.
Tonino




[vchkpw] vpopmail = 5.4.8 solaris install problem

2004-12-08 Thread Jeremy Kister
I have identified an installation problem in the latest releases of vpopmail
on Solaris 2.7

the install program used by the Makefile does not support installing
multiple files in one run, and it does not error when told to install
multiple files -- it simply installs the first in the list, and exits.

this yields 'make install' not copying config.h, vauth.h, nor vlimits.h to
~vpopmail/include/

needless to say, this makes things _very_ confusing, when vuserinfo works,
but when programs like qmailadmin dont work (because they are using include
files from an older vpopmail series that were not overwritten)


the following patch fixes the problem (use patch -d vpopmail-5.4.8 
vpopmail-5.4.8-kisterfix):

--- Makefile.am.orig 2004-12-09 00:29:58.222616000 -0500
+++ Makefile.am   2004-12-09 00:31:00.863282000 -0500
@@ -151,9 +151,9 @@
   $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 \
 config.h $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/vpopmail_config.h

-  $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 \
-vpopmail.h config.h vauth.h vlimits.h \
-$(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/
+  for include in vpopmail.h config.h vauth.h vlimits.h ; do \
+ $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 $$include $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/
; \
+  done

   $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/doc/man_html
   $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/doc/doc_html
--- Makefile.in.orig 2004-12-09 00:30:02.552653000 -0500
+++ Makefile.in   2004-12-09 00:30:30.282952000 -0500
@@ -829,9 +829,9 @@
   $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 \
 config.h $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/vpopmail_config.h

-  $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 \
-vpopmail.h config.h vauth.h vlimits.h \
-$(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/
+  for include in vpopmail.h config.h vauth.h vlimits.h ; do \
+ $(INSTALL) -o root -m 0444 $$include $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/include/
; \
+  done

   $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/doc/man_html
   $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/doc/doc_html


--

Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net/