Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
Thank so much to all people that respond my question. I think i´ll be use a custom rbl zone first, and then another implementation. Sorry about speeling and regards, Fernando Milovich - Original Message - From: "John Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch
On 2006-04-03, at 1442, John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-03, at 0727, Rick Widmer wrote: In the patch, how do you separate password and real_name in add_user? I know the help doesn't mention it, but I think it requires a real name value to put into GECOS. It is at least an option. good point. i totally missed that, and i even changed one of the _TOKENS strings to be called GECOS_TOKENS after seeing that it was only used the one time. now we see why it's better to have several eyes looking at the code. this is going to be another problem. since a password may contain spaces, and a gecos may also contain spaces, there is no reliable way to write such a parser unless there is a specific delimiter between them... and since a password, by definition, can contain any printable character (ASCII 0x21 - 0x7E) the delimiter cannot be one of these. my honest answer is this: README.vpopmaild doesn't talk about there being a gecos field, neither does the vpopmaild wiki entry. in this one case, because the documentation doesn't mention it and because it causes a problem, i would say to pull the gecos functionality out of the add_user command, and add a "gecos" verb to "mod_user" (which needs one anyway.) there will be a newer patch on my web site this evening (i would do it now but i need to run some errands first.) actually, README.vpopmaild DID have a mention of "long_name", i had just never noticed it. the updated version of README.vpopmail on my web site now does not have this, and there is also a "vpopmail-5.4.15-cslogin.2.patch" where the add_user code no longer looks for a gecos name. when it calls adduser() to create the mailbox, it passes the mailbox name as the gecos name, so the new mailbox will have the same name as the mailbox itself. -- | John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | -- | Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX | | pretty than it is to make Windows secure. | -- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [vchkpw] How to Unsubscribe
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 10:15, sanskar sony wrote: > Would anyone please let me know , How to unsubscribe from this group? we've already told you. If you still can't figure out out, view the source of this message, and look for the "List-Unsubscribe" header. -Jeremy > > Either i want everything or nothing. I assume now, that this is your signature. You really should make that more clear, as right now it is not clear. Notice how my signature is separated from my message body with a '--'. If your MUA won't automatically put this in for you, a simple 'hack' would be to simply add the '--' to the top line of your signature. -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. And the lord said unto John; Come forth and receive eternal life. John came fifth and won a toaster. pgpohyg5A23Bc.pgp Description: PGP signature
[vchkpw] How to Unsubscribe
Would anyone please let me know , How to unsubscribe from this group?Either i want everything or nothing. Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
On 2006-04-05, at 0002, Fernando Milovich wrote: I mean bypass RBL is the client is authenticated. But it seems to be no possibly. This problem is because our customers use ISP connections like ADSL and Dial Up and these connections are blocked by CBL at spamhaus.org I think i´ll have to change the RBL checker. set up a second SMTP service for your users. it should not use port 25, it should not accept mail at all unless the client has sent a successful AUTH command, and it should not accept an AUTH command unless the connection is encrypted (via SSL or TLS.) depending on the qmail patches you are using, the second and third conditions may not be possible for you- but the first condition, running an SMTP service on some other port, anybody can do. usually the biggest mental hurdle is realizing that it is possible to run multiple SMTP services on the same machine. just take the "run" script from your existing service and copy it to a new service directory... change the port number from 25 (or "smtp", if that's how it's listed in your file) to 587, and fire it up. or run it on port 465, substitute sslserver for tcpserver, make a key pair, and you're up and running with an SSL-secured SMTP server. http://qmail.jms1.net/smtp-service.shtml is a web page i wrote which explains how to set up SMTP services. it's slanted towards people who use my combined patch file (which you may want to take a look at- lots of tasty goodies in there) but the basic idea is the same for any qmail system- you can have as many SMTP services as you need, as long as each one has its own IP/PORT combination. it may contain some helpful information, and it certainly explains things in more detail than this message. enjoy. -- | John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | -- | Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX | | pretty than it is to make Windows secure. | -- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
On Monday 03 April 2006 07:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, there is any rule to put in ~vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp for one user has > been authenticated not be IP checked on rblsmtpd ? I think that can be > possible using environment variables, may not. > > Something like this: > > 111.111.111.111:allow,RBLSMTPD="" if you are authenticating with pop-before-smtp, this should be a fairly trivial change to the vpopmail code. Look for the string 'RELAYCLIENT' in the vpopmail source and slap in RBLSMTPD="" into there. If you're using smtp auth only, you really can't do what you are asking, other than recoding qmail-smtpd to integrate rblsmtpd support as well as smtp auth *shrugs* -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. And the lord said unto John; Come forth and receive eternal life. John came fifth and won a toaster. pgpgaomySlwun.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
Use a scoring based RBL check. rblsmtpd denies all connections existing in RBLs You could modify it to do a scoring algorithm if you wanted, finding only the popular entries. SpamAssassin (with simscan) will do what you want, adding a score based on the credibility and error rates of each RBL. So something in one RBL will have a higher Spam score (and combined with other features may throw it over the edge), but something in three RBLs will be enough to reject the message.You could of course just find RBLs that don't block your customers or have good removal rules.-M Fernando Milovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I mean bypass RBL is the client is authenticated. But it seems to be no possibly.This problem is because our customers use ISP connections like ADSL and Dial Up and these connections are blocked by CBL at spamhaus.orgI think i´ll have to change the RBL checker.Thanks so much.- Original Message - From: "John Simpson" To: Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:18 PMSubject: Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw
