Re: [videoblogging] Re: Underwater
Fantastic video love the Fresh Prince ram track!! Taylor Barcroft Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia On Aug 21, 2005, at 8:58 PM, Eric Rice wrote: One of my co-hosts went to Cancun with his Canon SD500 in an underwater enclosure. http://www.blogscene.com/josh/archives/2005/06/overdue_video_f.html Eric Rice http://www.ericrice.com http://www.audioblog.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Rocketboom on CBS news
http://dvblog.org/rocketboom-on-cbs-news doron SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rocketboom on CBS news
Hi Doron, Please describe links that you send to the list. Without a description, everyone has to click the link to figure out what it is. ** This link goes to a QuickTime video of the CBS report. ** I've already seen it. On Aug 22, 2005, at 7:56 AM, doron wrote: http://dvblog.org/rocketboom-on-cbs-news doron --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Weagel and Bluestein on Content
Wow. Did all three. Hey, Quirk - where you been, dude? Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - community http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . - Original Message - From: Adam Quirk To: Videobloggers Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 3:20 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Weagel and Bluestein on Content http://insanefilms.com/?p=95 Watch and listen and learn. Or scream with terror. -- _ Quirk _ Bullemhead.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rocketboom on CBS news
Great Job! Check out my article with embedded video at FutureMedia. I have links to the websites of all the parties involved including Les Moonves, the chair of CBS who, it turns out, is in the Wikipedia. Links to Andrew, Amanda, and Zadi Diaz’s as well as the CBS page for Jim Axelrod. 11 links in my story including the Ambrosia Software site of the software used to make the quicktime version. I learned from Chuck Olsen how to make the QT movie (I have the same software Snapz Pro X 2.0.2, he used) and then made another one myself with better audio and a CBS News cover frame. Thanks Chuck. You all are free to use it instead if you like it better. Because of the links, re-recording and editing that CBS piece in Final Cut Pro 4.5 and the embedded video, it took me all weekend to get that one small post done. Does anyone know how to keep the vertical correct when you take a piece through FCP? Chuck and I both lost about 20 vertical pixels in the process. Note the black bars above and below the video in the normal 240 high frame. The original Snapz Pro X recording does not have those bars. The video is slightly squished vertically. I would love to know the work around to get rid of this. Anyone? Taylor Barcroft Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia On Aug 22, 2005, at 4:56 AM, doron wrote: http://dvblog.org/rocketboom-on-cbs-news doron Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- font face=arial size=-1a href=http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hadg3fk/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124723822/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/*http://www.thebeehive.org Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy/a./font ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Sony HD Camera, Under $2000
Cool! Thanks, Kunga. I'll definitely look into this more after I get off work! And thanks for the HD/HDV correction (I wasn't clear on the difference, but you inspired me to Google it). Looking forward to seeing your HDV-sourced examples, -David From: Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Sony HD Camera, Under $2000 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:37:15 -0700 Yes that is correct David with XLR connectors etc. The advantage over the original is size and weight about HALF the first model. Much better for undercover and field work. Still real HDV. BYW just a note - these cameras are not HD cameras. They are HDV cameras. They shoot NATIVE 1920 x 1080i HDV and when you dumb that footage down to our internet level it is going to look FANTASTIC! I have access to the original model as soon as he stops working with it and will be posting examples of HDV sourced video soon. If you subscribe to MacTV on iTunes he already posted an HDV shoot of the Apple Intel Mac announcement in HDV and it looks FANTASTIC!! Go look. It's up there for the taking. I would always ask the Chuckmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] at http://Supervideo.com where to buy my cameras for the lowest price. He makes it his business to know. And he has arrangements with reputable dealers to give his followers the lowest price. He is a global authority on all things DV and now HDV. I recommend everyone bookmark his site for the latest info on what's next and new from Japan. Taylor Barcroft Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Get to see new Mefeedia features before anyone else
Sign up as a usability tester and get to see new Mefeedia features before anyone else. I'll show you new stuff and ask you what you think. It's weird, but most people find this to be a lot of fun. (And no commitment.) Details here: http://mefeedia.com/usability/ Check it. Peter YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] vlognoscenti
Hey, I think I just made this word up. And if you are on this list, you are one. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: vlognoscenti
ugggh, what does it mean? would it be something like vlognorati? both vlognoscenti and vlognorati are really bad words IMHO :-) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I think I just made this word up. And if you are on this list, you are one. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry)
Is there a definitive characteristic that is exclusive to all blogs? I'm not sure. As an information architect obsessed with categorization, I have to chime in :) There is no definitive characteristic that is exclusive to all blogs. It is a category with fuzzy boundaries, as we say. Many categories have fuzzy boundaries. Take mother. How can we classify something as a mother? Is there a list of defining characteristics? Not really. Given birth? Not really, how about a person whose child was adopted. Yet we still call her a mother. Taking care of a child? Not really, how about someone who gave birth but doesn't take care of the child. And so on. Yet, we all know when someone is a mother and when they're not. It just doesn't work by using in/out criteria. The discussion of trying to define blogging in terms of a list of checkboxes we can check of to determine this is fruitless. Cheers, Peter YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [videoblogging] new video blog software : Patchouli
Nice work. The graphics are pretty funky on the http://www.sys-org.net site. Looks like good work and in the works since 2003! steven :: stevenR2.com From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of bertrand Sent: 22 August 2005 17:34 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] new video blog software : Patchouli Hello, I'm pleased to join the videoblogging list ! I've released Patchouli, a video blog software. You can check out more information here : http://www.mixnbrew.com/patchouli or watch the vlogs I'm making with : http://www.sys-org.net ( a video sketch book of a dance collective I'm involved with) http://mjukma.free.fr ( video samples of my Video-Jockey work) Cheers, Bertrand SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] broadcast machine
I just went public with my new broadcast machine site: http://www.worleyworks.com/bm/ Next, to integrate the broadcast machine rss feed into my front page...maybe. http://www.worleyworks.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry)
petertheman wrote: Many categories have fuzzy boundaries. Take "mother". How can we classify something as a mother? Is there a list of defining characteristics? Not really. Given birth? Not really, how about a person whose child was adopted. Yet we still call her a mother. Taking care of a child? Not really, how about someone who gave birth but doesn't take care of the child. And so on. Yet, we all know when someone is a mother and when they're not. It just doesn't work by using in/out criteria. Peter is exactly right. Like almost all natural language words, "blog" it is defined heuristically, not synthetically. (And that's indicated by the semantic drift the term has enjoyed since 1997.) There is no clearcut blogness test, but there is a list of blog characteristics, and blogness is proportional to the number of them exhibited. RSS feeds and trackbacks are certainly on that list. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] broadcast machine
That page looks really nice. Why does 'related web page' go to the same page for all your videos? Did you enter that URL for each video? Do you know how to have a Feedburner RSS feed instead of the Broadcast Machine RSS feed? Thanks, --Steve On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, tuplez2 wrote: I just went public with my new broadcast machine site: http://www.worleyworks.com/bm/ Next, to integrate the broadcast machine rss feed into my front page...maybe. http://www.worleyworks.com -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [videoblogging] Re: Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry)
Many categories have fuzzy boundaries. Take mother. How can we classify something as a mother? Actually, a mother seems to me to be a female that has given birth and/or has taken legal guardianship of a child. Of course there are breakdowns to this as well: birth mother, adoptive mother, etc. But certainly not all women are mothers. However, if I am reading your post correctly it seems to me you may have blurred the line betweenn a definition and word usage, e.g. The Mother Of All Wars is not literally a mother -- same with a woman who cares for someone or something like it were her child. A mothering relationship doesn't seem to necessarily make a woman a mother. If we are to agree that the definition of blog is nebulous at best, just like the definition of art. Then that, to me, means two things: 1) we will never be able to define what a vlog is, and 2) just as art is a subjective term, it is perfectly legitimate for someone to interpret blog as just another word for website (which, again, I don't necessarily agree with). -David From: petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:12:57 - Is there a definitive characteristic that is exclusive to all blogs? I'm not sure. As an information architect obsessed with categorization, I have to chime in :) There is no definitive characteristic that is exclusive to all blogs. It is a category with fuzzy boundaries, as we say. Many categories have fuzzy boundaries. Take mother. How can we classify something as a mother? Is there a list of defining characteristics? Not really. Given birth? Not really, how about a person whose child was adopted. Yet we still call her a mother. Taking care of a child? Not really, how about someone who gave birth but doesn't take care of the child. And so on. Yet, we all know when someone is a mother and when they're not. It just doesn't work by using in/out criteria. The discussion of trying to define blogging in terms of a list of checkboxes we can check of to determine this is fruitless. Cheers, Peter YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Mustek DV3000 opinions? Other inexpensive hybrids to consider?
Does anyone have any opinions on the Mustek DV3000? Or similar video camera under US$150 ? I'm thinking of using it for taking video mounted on a bicycle as well as handing it out to family members to take video and upload to vlog for a family-only videoblog. Things I like? AA Batteries, reportedly long battery life (6+ hours), records to SD card, video direct out. Requirements: video around 320x240 pixel size, 15-30 fps, raw format viewable on Pocket PC and desktop Windows PC, SD card a plus/Compact Flash okay, standard tripod mount, USB Mass Storage Device a plus. Review from Nov 2003: http://www.dansdata.com/dv3000.htm SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Archos
Just wondering if anyone has one of these? I saw one today and thought it would be perfect for watching videoblogs. http://www.archos.com/home.html -Chris -- http://www.chrisdanielvideos.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Underwater
I tried going to http://www.mortaine.com, which says it's "obsolete." I'd love to check out your aquarium scenes, so it would be very nice for those of us who are new, and don't automatically know the URL of every poster here, to get a URL when you mention a film on your vlog. Thanks! Bev http://funnytheworld.comhttp://funnytheblog.blogspot.com/ - Original Message - From: Stephanie Bryant To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:20 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Underwater My vlog entry from last Thursday or Friday has scenes from theaquarium, which while not strictly underwater are scenes of underwateractivity.My vlog entry on reincarnation has stills from my SCUBA checkout dive.When I'm underwater, I tend not to bring a camera. Too busy looking atstuff to film it.--StephanieOn 8/21/05, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wondering if there are any Vlogs with underwater video out there? Yahoo! Groups Links -- Stephanie Bryant[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.mortaine.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] OT: Taxonomy (was:Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry))
David Yirchott wrote: Peter is exactly right. Like almost all natural language words, "blog" it is defined heuristically, not synthetically. (And that's indicated by the semantic drift the term has enjoyed since 1997.) Hmmm I am not sure that I'd agree that "blog" is defined heuristically -- and if that were so, perhaps now it does mean all websites. Though, perhaps you could be more clear in what you mean (I think either you have the wrong word or I have the wrong definition). To me heuristically is like trial and error; solving a problem through discovery. Your search for clarity is exactly the issue here. I can empathize with the desire, but natural language will simply not permit it. As far as semantic drift is concerned, couldn't it have drifted enough to mean all websites? No. It simply hasn't and I daresay it never will. However it's quite possible that, increasingly, most new websites heretofore will be blogs. And how are we to chart the drift if no initial definition exists to serve as a starting point? I gave you the initial definition and a canonical prototype: Robot Wisdom. And no current one is available either. Perhaps I am wrong, but I am under the impression the definitions I've seen recently are up-to-date. There is no clearcut blogness test, but there is a list of blog characteristics, and blogness is proportional to the number of them exhibited. RSS feeds and trackbacks are certainly on that list. Yes, so is text, but again, just because a website has RSS and trackbacks and text doesn't make it a blog, does it? And if it is missing RSS and trackbacks, does that mean it cannot a blog? You've ignored what's been said here. "Blog" and "Mother" are sets of stereotypical characteristics. Is item X a blog or a mother? The answer is provided by the heuristic of checking off how many of those defining characteristics are exhibited by X. The result of these processes are a blogness score and a motherness score. Here you give several (or all) of the defining characteristics of motherness: Actually, a mother seems to me to be a female that has given birth and/or has taken legal guardianship of a child. Of course there are breakdowns to this as well: birth mother, adoptive mother, etc. But certainly not all women are mothers. However, if I am reading your post correctly it seems to me you may have blurred the line betweenn a definition and word usage, e.g. The Mother Of All Wars is not literally a mother -- same with a woman who cares for someone or something like it were her child. A mothering relationship doesn't seem to necessarily make a woman a mother. If we are to agree that the definition of blog is nebulous at best, just like the definition of art. Then that, to me, means two things: 1) we will never be able to define what a vlog is, and 2) just as art is a subjective term, it is perfectly legitimate for someone to interpret "blog" as just another word for website (which, again, I don't necessarily agree with). The term "art" is notoriously nebulous as its definition has been under concentrated attack by wave after wave of philosophers, critics, and "artists". Most words have not had to endure such brutal levels of definitional abuse. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] node 101 + flash conference
Actually, we have a Node101 wiki already set up. I just copied what Markus started and moved it to: http://node101.org/community/index.php/Envisioning_Node_101 Thanks!!! Verdi On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:31 PM, Markus Sandy wrote: mariah katharine wrote: theres gonna be another flash conference tomorrow (check the wiki for details), so lets make this topic #1. lets find out whos got the hook-up, whos got the resources start putting our heads together now. everybody get off your ass join in! theres no reason we cant make this happen. great idea Mariah! I've set up a wiki page for this topic which all can add to: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Node_101 The next conference is at 5pm PDT/8pm EDT (tuesday) or 12 midnight GMT (wednesday) a little over 28 hours from now conference room link (you can check audio and video settings anytime before conference): http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/index.php?pwd=52d914-1459 wiki: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogger_Videoconferences Markus -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ SIG=12hdodrjm/M=362329.6886308.7839368.1510227/D=groups/ S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124746287/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/ *http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992 Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! /a./font ~- Yahoo! Groups Links YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Underwater
your vlog is great! link to it! trust me, you don't want to work with anyone who objected to it how many days are in that book anyway? http://mortaine.blogspot.com markus Stephanie Bryant wrote: That would be cause my .sig file doesn't have my vlog on it, mainly because I am trying to start a business and am in the uncomfortable position of not being sure whether or not explicitly linking to my videoblog is going to help or hurt me in that. I can go either way on it, to be honest, and have had to explicitly mention my vlog in relation to seeking contracts that have to do with blogging and videoblogging. -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Underwater
I can vlog in the shower without needing a Glad-lock; my shower setup makes it pretty easy to keep a camera dry. But then there'd be all the nekkidness. --Stephanie On 8/22/05, kinganti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: who has the balls to put their camera in a GLAD-Lock (blue and yellow make green) zip lock baggie. now vlogging in the shower is at your fingertips! -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mortaine.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] SocialSWF: New Service at OPEN4ALL.INFO
swf.open4all.info Clips from movie sections at del.icio.us are ranked according to number of blog posts with direct links to them (checked via Technorati). The number of occurrences for each clip at del.icio.us and the number of linking blog posts at Technorati are then taken as the input to produce a popularity rank for each clip. After probabilistic analysis - consisting of a test to confirm that sample distribution is consistent with exponential distribution - top 80% of most popular clips are selected. Selected clips are then downloaded and transcoded on the fly to Flash (SWF) format. MPlayer and FFmpeg are used to test, download and convert clips from any format to Flash SWF. The list and clips repository refresh twice per day ... YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Underwater
365. In other countries, it's sold as a calendar/diary. I'm hoping they send me a free copy for 2006. Then I can put a disclaimer on my site. :D --Stephanie On 8/22/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how many days are in that book anyway?-- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.mortaine.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Archos
I have the AV420, which does a smashing good job capturing video into the AVI format. I used this to capture some Current.TV (link: http://blog.ericrice.com/blog/_archives/ 2005/8/5/407.html ) I've yet to watch video on it, since I think it is VERY strict in what file formats/codecs are used. I had difficulty in the past, so perhaps I should try again. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wondering if anyone has one of these? I saw one today and thought it would be perfect for watching videoblogs. http://www.archos.com/home.html -Chris -- http://www.chrisdanielvideos.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Mustek DV3000 opinions? Other inexpensive hybrids to consider?
I don't have experience using that mp4 camera but I would suggest that you check out CNET Review site. They list similar cameras by price and include unbiased opinions from product owners. Besides I would suggest that you check cameras from DXG, Audiovox, and Aiptek. There might be forum also out there on the web. Google mp4 cmaera forum. JV --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ecomputerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have any opinions on the Mustek DV3000? Or similar video camera under US$150 ? I'm thinking of using it for taking video mounted on a bicycle as well as handing it out to family members to take video and upload to vlog for a family-only videoblog. Things I like? AA Batteries, reportedly long battery life (6+ hours), records to SD card, video direct out. Requirements: video around 320x240 pixel size, 15-30 fps, raw format viewable on Pocket PC and desktop Windows PC, SD card a plus/Compact Flash okay, standard tripod mount, USB Mass Storage Device a plus. Review from Nov 2003: http://www.dansdata.com/dv3000.htm SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] SocialSWF: New Service at OPEN4ALL.INFO
Neat. How come all the conversion to Flash? Just to standardize the format? Would this be considered pirating the video clips? On Aug 22, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Drazen Pantic wrote: swf.open4all.info Clips from movie sections at del.icio.us are ranked according to number of blog posts with direct links to them (checked via Technorati). The number of occurrences for each clip at del.icio.us and the number of linking blog posts at Technorati are then taken as the input to produce a popularity rank for each clip. After probabilistic analysis - consisting of a test to confirm that sample distribution is consistent with exponential distribution - top 80% of most popular clips are selected. Selected clips are then downloaded and transcoded on the fly to Flash (SWF) format. MPlayer and FFmpeg are used to test, download and convert clips from any format to Flash SWF. The list and clips repository refresh twice per day ... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ SIG=12h9jd46k/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/ S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124750339/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/ *http://www.thebeehive.org Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy/a./font ~- Yahoo! Groups Links YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [videoblogging] OT: Taxonomy (was:Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry))
Hmmm I am not sure that I'd agree that blog is defined heuristically -- and if that were so, perhaps now it does mean all websites. Though, perhaps you could be more clear in what you mean (I think either you have the wrong word or I have the wrong definition). To me heuristically is like trial and error; solving a problem through discovery. Your search for clarity is exactly the issue here. I can empathize with the desire, but natural language will simply not permit it. Charles, if you don't know, just say you don't know. ;) Seriously, while the psycholinguistic autopsy is interesting, I think we've gone a bit off track. I think the initial idea is just that there is no agreed upon definition of what a blog is -- and insofar as I can tell, we agree on that. However, I think you believe that to be the case due to a failure of natural language (isn't the vast majority -- virtually all save for base words such as ma [which many suggest is the sound an infant mimicking suckling makes] and onomatopoeia -- of language unnatural?) whereas I question whether there are any defining characteristics. I do find it interesting that at the same time you claim there can not be a definition, you are adamant that it has to have RSS and trackbacks. As far as semantic drift is concerned, couldn't it have drifted enough to mean all websites? No. It simply hasn't and I daresay it never will. However it's quite possible that, increasingly, most new websites heretofore will be blogs. I am curious how you know that semantic drift simply has not rendered blog as another word for website. And what seperates the new websites that are blogs from those that are not? Are you suggesting that *any* new website with periodic posts and an RSS feed *is* a blog? And how are we to chart the drift if no initial definition exists to serve as a starting point? I gave you the initial definition and a canonical prototype: Robot Wisdom. The initial definition you gave me was: The term used to mean, very specifically, a periodic list of interesting links found on the web. The prototypical example remains Robot Wisdom. These days it is synonymous with the common features shared between several widely-used applications: periodic posts, rss, trackback pings. A list of intersting links found on the web sounds sort of like the Google example. The rest of it seems to indicate that a blog is not synonymous with a website that has periodic posts but no RSS. That will confuse many people who consider themselves legitimate bloggers, I think. If you respond to this post, I'd love to see your answers to: 1) Can a website with periodic personal posts, but no RSS or trackbacks be a blog? 2) What if it has periodic posts and RSS, but no trackbacks? 3) What if it is a television station website with periodically posted news stories and an RSS feed? 4) How often is periodic? If someone fails to update their blog in two weeks, does it stop being a blog? Wikipedia's entry for blog seems to claim RSS and trackbacks aren't necessary, for what it is worth. Also, it seems strange to me that something that cannot be described has technical requirements like RSS and trackbacks: content cannot be pinned down, look cannot be pinned down, ownership requirements cannot be pinned down, but it must have trackbacks? And no current one is available either. Perhaps I am wrong, but I am under the impression the definitions I've seen recently are up-to-date. There is no clearcut blogness test, but there is a list of blog characteristics, and blogness is proportional to the number of them exhibited. RSS feeds and trackbacks are certainly on that list. If there is a useful list of blog characteristics, shouldn't that equal a clearcut blogness test? Anyway, the true problem is that none of the items on the list you've given is 1) required for a blog or 2) exclusive to a blog. Are all current blogs without RSS not full blogs? I have a new blog. That's not a blog! It's only a 75% blog! What would the other 25% be considered? What if a site scored 50%? At what level does one have a legitimate blog? Yes, so is text, but again, just because a website has RSS and trackbacks and text doesn't make it a blog, does it? And if it is missing RSS and trackbacks, does that mean it cannot a blog? You've ignored what's been said here. Blog and Mother are sets of stereotypical characteristics. Is item X a blog or a mother? The answer is provided by the heuristic of checking off how many of those defining characteristics are exhibited by X. The result of these processes are a blogness score and a motherness score. Sure, the list checking is perception. But I've not heard anything that would disqualify a site as a blog. No RSS? No trackbacks? I think many people would disagree with that. I've only heard three things that would qualify it as a blog: periodic posts, RSS, and trackbacks. Those are increasingly common
Re: [videoblogging] OT: Taxonomy (was:Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry))
David Yirchott wrote: If there is a useful list of blog characteristics, shouldn't that equal a clearcut blogness test? Can such a list be "clearcut" when items can have some of the qualities and not all of them? Anyway, the true problem is that none of the items on the list you've given is 1) required for a blog or 2) exclusive to a blog. That's how it is with most definitions as well. Do you think "blog" is more ill-defined than "mother"? Are all current blogs without RSS not full blogs? I'm still waiting to hear of these "many" blogs that aren't running RSS + trackbacks. What is their number compared to those that do? Remember, these words are description of reality, not axiomatic constructs. If the vast majority of websites called "blogs" start using a background color of #d5691a, that will become one of the defining characteristics of blogs. "I have a new blog." "That's not a blog! It's only a 75% blog!" What would the other 25% be considered? What if a site scored 50%? At what level does one have a legitimate blog? At precisely the dividing line between Industrial and Techno, or when a painting is considered Cubist, or a puppy becomes a dog. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] node 101 + flash conference
hey thanks for the shout out mariah! i wont be able to attend the vid conference tomorrow due to prior videoblogging engagements (i kid you not) but i just wanted to say that what we want Node101 to be is like the new (and way better) public access. giving people access and knowledge about how to create and view media. we believe that teaching and spreading this medium is the best way to get the most diverse creators and conversations going. as a collective of 4 (jay, josh, verdi and i) we've taught at a total of 20 institutions and conferences not to mention at dozens of folks homes/jobs on an indivdual basis this is an organization ment to empower people. and include people. the reason we called it node101 was so we could have several nodes throughout the world who are teaching and spreading the info. our dream is to teach individuals, and importantly, teach teachers who will go back and teach more people. just a background. yes we need resources, space, equipment and money for people's time. thanks for starting the conversation mariah and markus -ryanne On 8/22/05, mariah katharine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey kids, in case you missed it, markus has posted a video today detailing some of the needs goals of the node 101 project. this is muy importante, so stop what youre doing go watch it right now! http://apperceive.blogs.com/apperceive/2005/08/node_101_needs.html they need everything from cameras computers to desk chairs, not to mention a space some rent money... and theres blatently enough talent, skill, experience and connections within this group to get this project off the ground. theres gonna be another flash conference tomorrow (check the wiki for details), so lets make this topic #1. lets find out whos got the hook-up, whos got the resources start putting our heads together now. everybody get off your ass join in! theres no reason we cant make this happen. Yahoo! Groups Links -- ~Ryanne Hodson~ Start a Free Videoblog...Right Now freevlog.org -- -transcending traditional media- http://ryanedit.blogspot.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] NYT article On $$$ for Bloggers Who Take Ads
I got this article link via Media Bistro: NICHE FILMS APPEAL WITH ADS ON NICHE BLOGS (NYT) Film companies are taking out ads on smaller sites and blogs, hoping to generate interest among niche audiences for films like The Constant Gardener and The Aristocrats. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/22/technology/22blog.html It seems to be an open article - no password required but I don't know how long that will last. Here is an interesting extract: Seth Godin, an author and speaker on marketing, said that Focus was clearly ahead of the curve in seeking an audience based on online behavior. Mr. Godin cited a report from comScore Media Metrix, saying that blog readers visit almost twice as many Web pages as the average Internet user. We know that people visiting a blog are more likely to take action he said, to click on a link or buy online. In particular, the ads for The Constant Gardener seem to seek out people who distrust multinational corporations. The banner contains the taglines The corruption is contagious and The conspiracy is global, and links to the film's Web site, where snippets of dialogue about payoffs, cover-ups, unmarked graves can be heard in the trailer. I know we have various feelings about this - I got a couple of waves of quezy just reading the about paragraph. Not because of the money but of taking a (well founded) distrust and spinning it into a movie ticket sale. But read the article first before you hurl invectives in either direction. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Intro
Hi, I actually introduced myself a whle back and have been lurking since. I just posted a video that is an intro and some thoughts on vblogging. I am nursing student just getting started in vblogging. I do a ton of vblog viewing but am trying to do more contributing going forward. It's kind of rough but I am still learning. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Intro part 2
OOps - regarding my previous post. It would probably help to give a URL: nurse2be.blogspot.com. Sorry! SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Intro
Actually stopped by your vlog not too long ago via vlogmap. Welcome out of the lurk-closet. Seeing more of what nursing school is all about would be great. My mom tells horror stories from the 50's. Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - community http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . - Original Message - From: monika_lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:21 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Intro Hi, I actually introduced myself a whle back and have been lurking since. I just posted a video that is an intro and some thoughts on vblogging. I am nursing student just getting started in vblogging. I do a ton of vblog viewing but am trying to do more contributing going forward. It's kind of rough but I am still learning. Yahoo! Groups Links YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Intro
Welcome aboard! My mother was a nurse also. It's a great profession. cheers. jad www.dummycast.com www.madpod.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually stopped by your vlog not too long ago via vlogmap. Welcome out of the lurk-closet. Seeing more of what nursing school is all about would be great. My mom tells horror stories from the 50's. Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - community http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . - Original Message - From: monika_lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:21 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Intro Hi, I actually introduced myself a whle back and have been lurking since. I just posted a video that is an intro and some thoughts on vblogging. I am nursing student just getting started in vblogging. I do a ton of vblog viewing but am trying to do more contributing going forward. It's kind of rough but I am still learning. Yahoo! Groups Links YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry)
Jen Simmons wrote: Now all you have to do is define what a blog is. Some would argue it is just another name for website. -David I wouldn't be one of those people. I started building websites in 1998. I started building blogs in 2002. There's a big difference between the way a static html-based site works and blogging technology (using some sort of third party software that creates pages for you and automatically archives, moving older content off the home page without being asked.) I started a weblog in 1997, before the term 'blog' even existed. Actually, I don't even thing the word 'weblog' was really used then either. Many of the early weblogs were static html, but they were updated often (sometimes every single day!) and eventually 'permalinks' were considered *very* important for weblogs, so you could actually link to a single post, instead of just a page, and the concept of a 'front page of many posts with permalinks' was how it worked. While many weblogs were static html, plenty of us used tools to generate the html and then automatically upload it to the web. To me, the revolutionary thing about the invention of the blog is in the ease of the technology -- making it so very much easier to keep a site always changing, always current -- especially for those of us who've always built sites as a one-person team (not a huge site with a staff / with programmers there to write custom backend aps) Of course it's always been technologically possible to update a website often using static html, but the human-power-reality of the amount of time it took to constantly post new pages by hand meant it didn't happen nearly as much as I wanted. I would have never dreamed seven years ago of updating as often as I do now, or of running as many sites as I do now, or of those sites being as large and as complicated as they are now. In the past, I was always stuck being the only person who had the tech-know-how to make any changes. Now I can build a blog into my client's page, teach them the interface, and let them be responsible for all the news and announcements -- leave me out of it! The funny thing is, I think it was actually easier/quicker to update my weblog in 1997. I just ran a menu command in Frontier, typed in some text, and ran another menu command. Of course I had to be sitting at my own desktop computer, there were no comments, trackbacks, pings, clean urls, useful metadata, etc, etc, etc... Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] OT: Taxonomy (was:Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry))
Charles HOPE wrote: David Yirchott wrote: Are all current blogs without RSS not full blogs? I'm still waiting to hear of these many blogs that aren't running RSS + trackbacks. What is their number compared to those that do? Remember, these words are description of reality, not axiomatic constructs. If the vast majority of websites called blogs start using a background color of #d5691a, that will become one of the defining characteristics of blogs. Even if a vast majority of sites start using a background color of #d5691a I'd never know it, because I read their RSS/Atom feeds in an application that does not apply such styles. ;) Also, I typically turn off trackbacks due to trackback spam, so I guess my 'website' is only '83% blog' Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] OT: Taxonomy (was:Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog entry))
Charles, I was rather hoping you'd respond to: If you respond to this post, I'd love to see your answers to: 1) Can a website with periodic personal posts, but no RSS or trackbacks be a blog? 2) What if it has periodic posts and RSS, but no trackbacks? 3) What if it is a television station website with periodically posted news stories and an RSS feed? 4) How often is periodic? If someone fails to update their blog in two weeks, does it stop being a blog? David Yirchott wrote: If there is a useful list of blog characteristics, shouldn't that equal a clearcut blogness test? Can such a list be clearcut when items can have some of the qualities and not all of them? If you have a list of characteristics, shouldn't you end up with a clearcut answer? If you cannot, then I would suggest that the list isn't good enough. Or there is no differentiation to be found. Anyway, the true problem is that none of the items on the list you've given is 1) required for a blog or 2) exclusive to a blog. That's how it is with most definitions as well. Do you think blog is more ill-defined than mother? I disagree that most definitions fail in the same way. Also, I think we can both agree that blog is not as defined as mother. Things required for mother: female. Things exclusive to mother: has given birth; has taken legal guardianship of a child. Are all current blogs without RSS not full blogs? I'm still waiting to hear of these many blogs that aren't running RSS + trackbacks. What is their number compared to those that do? Remember, these words are description of reality, not axiomatic constructs. If the vast majority of websites called blogs start using a background color of #d5691a, that will become one of the defining characteristics of blogs. This isn't about majority. This is about definition. The exception disproves the rule. If any blogs do not have RSS, then blog by definition cannot require RSS. It is like saying that the Toyota Camry is the most prevalent car, therefore a car by definition is required to be a Toyota Camry. I have a new blog. That's not a blog! It's only a 75% blog! What would the other 25% be considered? What if a site scored 50%? At what level does one have a legitimate blog? At precisely the dividing line between Industrial and Techno, or when a painting is considered Cubist, or a puppy becomes a dog. Ah, at a virtually indefinable moment it becomes a virtually indefinable entity called a blog. I see. So, to recap: Blog cannot be defined Blogs have characteristics Those characteristics are not neither unique to blogs nor possessed by all blogs There is a checklist by which to check if a site is a blog There are -- as far as I can tell -- three criteria on that list upon which to judge blogness At an immeasurable point a site may slip below or achieve blogness Which, I suppose, sort of puts us back to the beginning. So, blog is either indefinable because it is: 1) Infinite and awesome and our tiny human brains and our petty language cannot begin to describe it. Like God, some might say. 2) Non-existent. Like God, some might say. So therefore, either way blog=God. Perhaps we should end this here and go worship our possibly non-existent master. :) -David YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: broadcast machine
Steve, All of those videos are related to that one website, so I just kept entering the same address. I think this is really so that when you view them via DTV you can click back, as there won't be much else to reference where they came from than the metatag. I'm sure you could point feedburner to broadcast machine's page, but I haven't tried, and have your choice of rss feeds. -Greg --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That page looks really nice. Why does 'related web page' go to the same page for all your videos? Did you enter that URL for each video? Do you know how to have a Feedburner RSS feed instead of the Broadcast Machine RSS feed? Thanks, --Steve On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, tuplez2 wrote: I just went public with my new broadcast machine site: http://www.worleyworks.com/bm/ Next, to integrate the broadcast machine rss feed into my front page...maybe. http://www.worleyworks.com -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [videoblogging] dot tv
As a General rule, .com is the best. No question. It is the default and much more memorable. That's not to say people aren't successful with .org .net .info etcetera. You just have to be prepared that most people you tell your URI to are likely going to visit the .com first. Between a .org.uk or .tv, as a lazy American I'd prefer the .tv as I would be more likely to remember it. And I wouldn't worry too much about the whole TV thing, afterall it doesn't really stand for television it stands for Tuvalo. Anyway, the association with television may help people remember it. -David From: Starfire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] dot tv Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:11:56 -0500 I'm considering a new domain for myself for my Vlogging ventures. The only suffixes available for the name I want are .org.uk or .tv. I kinda like the sound of .tv but vlogging is not TV. I suppose I could keep brainstorming names and find a .com out there that I like but I really wanna use a certain domain name. And with everybody getting content through a feed now days how important is a name? Is dot com the best? Thoughts, ideas? thanks. Starfire** SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] mel clint show
I created a video from vloggercue footage, where you might learn some stuff about Clint and Melanie Sharp that you may not have known before. http://www.richardshow.com/2005/08/vloggercue-3-mel-and-clint-showwatch.html ... Richard -- - Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] apple store presentations
Question: those of you doing videoblogging presentations at your local Apple stores... are you doing them on a regular basis...or just a one-off? Jay -- Adventures in Videoblogging URL: http://www.momentshowing.net http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] dot tv
hi Starfire, I personally favor .tv as far as vlogging goes. the odds of getting a shorter, more memorable domain are higher with .tv. the downside is that .tv domains are much more expensive compared to .com, .net, etc. I use GoDaddy, they are the cheapest at $34.95/year for a .tv domain. cheers, - Jared -- Adventures in biking: http://www.spokes.tv/ Adventures in life: http://jklett.blip.tv/ On Aug 22, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Starfire wrote: I'm considering a new domain for myself for my Vlogging ventures. The only suffixes available for the name I want are .org.uk or .tv. I kinda like the sound of .tv but vlogging is not TV. I suppose I could keep brainstorming names and find a .com out there that I like but I really wanna use a certain domain name. And with everybody getting content through a feed now days how important is a name? Is dot com the best? Thoughts, ideas? thanks. Starfire** SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
Is there an option in final cut pro that allows you to match the timeline presets with the codec of the videos you want to edit? Or do you just have to do it manually in order to not have to render? I have a Sony dsc-t7 digital camera that also shoots video and I'd like to edit the videos in fcp. The problem is that fcp tells me I need to render the clips even though I've matched the codec/video and timeline settings as closely as possible... Any ideas why this is happening? Maybe this feature exists and I just dont know about it. Figuring this out would help this long time lurker / irregular poster! -- Duncan RawlinsonBlog:http://thelastminute.typepad.comFeed:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheLastMinute YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] mel clint show
that is just too much fun! comedy, suspense - it had everything Richard wrote: I created a video from vloggercue footage, where you might learn some stuff about Clint and Melanie Sharp that you may not have known before. http://www.richardshow.com/2005/08/vloggercue-3-mel-and-clint-showwatch.html ... Richard -- - Richard http://www.richardshow.com Yahoo! Groups Links . -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
What are the specs on your machine? Have you tired converting the files using MPEG Streamclip to DV or another format...then import to FCP... I think, however might be wrong...aiff sound files work best in FCP and as for video, FCP can tackle (almost) any format... nm www.bicycle-sidewalk.com --- Duncan Rawlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an option in final cut pro that allows you to match the timeline presets with the codec of the videos you want to edit? Or do you just have to do it manually in order to not have to render? I have a Sony dsc-t7 digital camera that also shoots video and I'd like to edit the videos in fcp. The problem is that fcp tells me I need to render the clips even though I've matched the codec/video and timeline settings as closely as possible... Any ideas why this is happening? Maybe this feature exists and I just dont know about it. Figuring this out would help this long time lurker / irregular poster! -- Duncan Rawlinson Blog: http://thelastminute.typepad.com Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheLastMinute SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Weagel and Bluestein on Content
http://insanefilms.com/?p=95 Watch and listen and learn. Or scream with terror. thats the longest videolbog ive ever seen. must have been an hour. thank god for the archive. check out Richard Bluestein's reporting from Crawford TX. now we're talking content. http://yeastradio.com/?p=376 jay -- Adventures in Videoblogging URL: http://www.momentshowing.net http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
matching your codec and timeline as close as possible doesnt cut it in FCP it has to be exact, down to the aspect ratio and fps for your timeline to not have to render. there is no way to automate this that i know of i always have to match it manually and rarely (happened once) have i been able to make a good enough match to not have to render the whole thing before exporting. verdi has developed a droplet for your desktop from compressor to convert to full dv to import into FCP full dv is FCPs native format which it responds to the best verdi... take it from here. -ryanne On 8/22/05, Duncan Rawlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an option in final cut pro that allows you to match the timeline presets with the codec of the videos you want to edit? Or do you just have to do it manually in order to not have to render? I have a Sony dsc-t7 digital camera that also shoots video and I'd like to edit the videos in fcp. The problem is that fcp tells me I need to render the clips even though I've matched the codec/video and timeline settings as closely as possible... Any ideas why this is happening? Maybe this feature exists and I just dont know about it. Figuring this out would help this long time lurker / irregular poster! -- Duncan Rawlinson Blog: http://thelastminute.typepad.com Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheLastMinute YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Ryanne Hodson~ Start a Free Videoblog...Right Now freevlog.org -- -transcending traditional media- http://ryanedit.blogspot.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Mustek DV3000 opinions? Other inexpensive hybrids to consider?
The best deal on DXG is at TigerDirect http://tinyurl.com/au6ws Great site for price comparison and reviews http://reviews.cnet.com/?legacy=cnet Link to DXG DXG 202V http://reviews.cnet.com/DXG_202V/4505-6494_7-30842194.html I'm curious to know how the audio is for voice recordings for podcast production.(indoors and outdoor use) Is the video compressed or uncompress avi? Do use have test clips to what one would be getting? JV --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is my neck of the woods - I have a $80 DXG Model 202V Digital Video Camera. This is an early .avi version but it has been working great for me. It is a still camera, voice recorder and .avi camcorder that runs on AA's and SD card. I use rechargeable batteries and get decent life from them. I do understand and accept the limitations of these type of camera/camcorders. They may say the fps is 15-30 fps but mine is actually about 9 or 10 fps. Sometimes it cuts out after 1:30 of non-use. And if you have big fingers/hands it might be a bother. Mines has a touchpad on/off switch that announces when I turn it on. Hard to get candids. My DXG is made of sturdy stuff, I've been banging it around my bag it is still going after three months. http://www.dxgtech.com/ They do have new mp4 cameras http://www.dxgtech.co m/product_jpg/DVC406.jpg For indoor use? Fuggetabout. These babies need plenty of light. You are not going to be happy unless you are going for the look of little or no light. And forget about zoom. The macro mode works really well but there is no zoom other than your feet. Before I bought this camera I checked at http://www.epinions.com and was not happy with some of the reviews for Aiptek and Mustek. They go flaky soon after purchase. I also checked Amazon http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 1GT30Q/qid=1124753910/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-4460 400-9673518?v=glances=photon=507846 for other feelings about Aiptek http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 0T8BB6/qid=1124753910/sr=8-10/ref=pd_bbs_10/104-44 60400-9673518?v=glances=photon=507846 for a sample of Mustek reviews. Know what you are willing to trade off but go for it Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
Will that droplet work with 4.5's Compressor in Tiger 10.4.2? My Compressor appears to be broken at this system level on a d2.5 G5. Verdi please provide system specifications and FCP version number? Taylor Barcroft FutureMedia Video Journalist Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia On Aug 22, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Duncan Rawlinson wrote: I thought I could go the lazy route and not have to convert the files before editing... This droplet sounds promising... SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: apple store presentations
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: those of you doing videoblogging presentations at your local Apple stores... are you doing them on a regular basis...or just a one-off? We've only had one Seattle event and they expressed interest in hosting another event in September. Bre managed it and is currently touring the UK, but I'll be sure to hit him up when he returns. Rumor has it that Schlomo is working on an Apple event in Portland on September 9th. I plan to attend this and all other Seattle vloggers have been encouraged to go as well. -Matt -- http://www.leanbackvids.com/videoblog/ http://www.vlogmap.org/blog/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
Ok, here's the deal. You can set up a sequence preset that matches your source video so that you can edit without rendering. That sequence preset can be saved and even set as default if you want so that every time you make a new sequence it's this custom thing you set up. There are a couple of problems. As Ryanne mentioned, it has to be exact - fps, codec, codec quality, pixel aspect ratio, etc etc. or you'll have to render. Another problem that we've seen, at least with mpeg4 video, is crazy and annoying playback problems, ie video won't update but sound plays, random green blocks, and more. It seems to just be a display problem but it makes editing a pain in the ass. As far as I know, making a sequence preset works in all versions of FCP as long as it supports the codec you're working with. So the Compressor droplet: If you open up Compressor (I've tested this on version 1 2) and click the presets button you can create a QuickTime preset that matches the default DV sequence preset in FCP. Once you've created that, there is a button to click that will turn it into a droplet (a mini application) that you can save wherever you'd like. Then you can take your non-DV clips and just drop a whole bunch of them on the droplet and it will launch the Batch Monitor and transcode everything to DV. Then you can import those files and edit in FCP without rendering. When you start with small mpeg 4 clips, convert to DV, edit, recompress to mpeg4 again (at a decent bit rate - 700kbits/sec +) you will notice very little difference from the original clips. So here are the settings: Encoder Tab: File Format: QuickTime Movie Video Settings: Compression Type: DV/DVCPRO - NTSC Frame Rate: 29.97 Key Frames: All Compressor Quality: Medium Scan Mode: Interlaced Aspect Ratio: 4:3 Data Rate: Automatic Sound Settings: Format: Linear PCM Channels: Stereo (L R) Rate 48.000 kHz Sample Rate Converter Settings: Quality: Normal Linear PCM Settings: Sample Size: 16 bits Streaming: None Geometry Tab: Frame Size: 720 X 480 Pixel Aspect: NTSC CCIR 601/DV Constrain to display aspect: None That's all there is to it! :) Of course this will be in the book with lots of pretty screen shots. BTW, I've tested this with system 10.3, QT 6, FCP 4 4.5, Compressor 1 System 10.4, QT 7, FCP 4.5, Compressor 1 System 10.4, QT 7, FCP 5, Compressor 2 -- Verdi http://michaelverdi.com http://freevlog.org http://graymattergravy.com On Aug 22, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Kunga wrote: Will that droplet work with 4.5's Compressor in Tiger 10.4.2? My Compressor appears to be broken at this system level on a d2.5 G5. Verdi please provide system specifications and FCP version number? Taylor Barcroft FutureMedia Video Journalist Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia On Aug 22, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Duncan Rawlinson wrote: I thought I could go the lazy route and not have to convert the files before editing... This droplet sounds promising... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ SIG=12hm8361l/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/ S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124776617/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/ *http://www.thebeehive.org Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy/a./font ~- Yahoo! Groups Links SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [videoblogging] dot tv
I was in the same position last week. I just went for .TV. I kinda like the sound of it anyway - a differentiator from the usual .com Id just make sure the name you use as part of the domain is quite easy to remember (so they dont have to remember it is some weird name AND .TV). steven :: Release 2.0 :: http://stevenR2.com From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Starfire Sent: 23 August 2005 01:12 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] dot tv I'm considering a new domain for myself for my Vlogging ventures. The only suffixes available for the name I want are .org.uk or .tv. I kinda like the sound of .tv but vlogging is not TV. I suppose I could keep brainstorming names and find a .com out there that I like but I really wanna use a certain domain name. And with everybody getting content through a feed now days how important is a name? Is dot com the best? Thoughts, ideas? thanks. Starfire** YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] FLV RSS feeds available
This will probably be of interest to anyone who makes aggregator software, but since our recent launch of all the video transcoders, I thought I'd throw out there that I can create an infinite number of RSS feeds with FLVs as the enclosures, converted from any video on the web. Let me know if you need me to generate any for testing and whatnot. Also, if you have access to an RSS-reading mobile phone that supports FLV, let me know, and I'll make some lightweight FLV feeds (to conserve your minutes ;-) Best, Eric Rice http://www.ericrice.com Silicon Valley: +1 408-612-3427 London: +44 (0)20 7078 7282 SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Your oldest vlog entry
I starting posting videos on my blog in 2001, mostly live clips of my friends' bands. In January 2002 I started a video blog at http://swordfight.org/video . The first post featured audio from famous UFO expert Stanton T. Friedman, as well as a special guest appearance by our old friend, mister plastic bag tossed around by the wind. http://swordfight.org/downloads/avbleed.mov Philip Clark http://swordfight.org Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:19:14 -0700 From: Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your oldest vlog entry I just found my first video-on-a-blog entry, from March 25, 2002, one week after I got my first blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/mortaine/2900.html Wasn't, like, RSS+enclosures back then, but still. Video. Blog. Whee. What's yours? --Stephanie -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mortaine.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] fcp timeline settings
Wow! Micahel thanks for the detailed response! This is so kickass! I'll go ahead and try this. We're all lucky to have people out there like Michael who can tell us whats what. Whats the name of the book? Was it discussed on the list already? On 8/22/05, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, here's the deal.You can set up a sequence preset that matchesyour source video so that you can edit without rendering.Thatsequence preset can be saved and even set as default if you want sothat every time you make a new sequence it's this custom thing you set up.There are a couple of problems.As Ryanne mentioned, it hasto be exact - fps, codec, codec quality, pixel aspect ratio, etc etc.or you'll have to render.Another problem that we've seen, at least with mpeg4 video, is crazy and annoying playback problems, ie videowon't update but sound plays, random green blocks, and more.Itseems to just be a display problem but it makes editing a pain in theass.As far as I know, making a sequence preset works in all versions of FCP as long as it supports the codec you're working with.So the Compressor droplet:If you open up Compressor (I've tested this on version 1 2) andclick the presets button you can create a QuickTime preset that matches the default DV sequence preset in FCP.Once you've createdthat, there is a button to click that will turn it into adroplet (a mini application) that you can save wherever you'dlike.Then you can take your non-DV clips and just drop a whole bunch of them on the droplet and it will launch the Batch Monitor andtranscode everything to DV.Then you can import those files and editin FCP without rendering.When you start with small mpeg 4 clips,convert to DV, edit, recompress to mpeg4 again (at a decent bit rate - 700kbits/sec +) you will notice very little difference from theoriginal clips.So here are the settings:Encoder Tab:File Format: QuickTime MovieVideo Settings:Compression Type: DV/DVCPRO - NTSC Frame Rate: 29.97Key Frames: AllCompressor Quality: MediumScan Mode: InterlacedAspect Ratio: 4:3Data Rate: AutomaticSound Settings:Format: Linear PCMChannels: Stereo (L R)Rate 48.000 kHzSample Rate Converter Settings: Quality: NormalLinear PCM Settings: Sample Size: 16 bitsStreaming: NoneGeometry Tab:Frame Size: 720 X 480Pixel Aspect: NTSC CCIR 601/DVConstrain to display aspect: None That's all there is to it! :)Of course this will be in the bookwith lots of pretty screen shots.BTW, I've tested this with system 10.3, QT 6, FCP 4 4.5, Compressor 1System 10.4, QT 7, FCP 4.5 , Compressor 1System 10.4, QT 7, FCP 5, Compressor 2--Verdihttp://michaelverdi.comhttp://freevlog.org http://graymattergravy.comOn Aug 22, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Kunga wrote: Will that droplet work with 4.5's Compressor in Tiger 10.4.2? My Compressor appears to be broken at this system level on a d2.5 G5. Verdi please provide system specifications and FCP version number? Taylor Barcroft FutureMedia Video Journalist Now listed in the iTunes Podcast Directory. FutureMedia, or future, media, parties, taylor, barcroft ... barcroft (gizmo) http://gizmoproject.com kungax (Skype) http://skype.com kungag5 (iChat-AIM) http://www.aim.com http://FutureMedia.org http://videopodcaster.blogspot.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia On Aug 22, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Duncan Rawlinson wrote: I thought I could go the lazy route and not have to convert the files before editing... This droplet sounds promising... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ SIG=12hm8361l/M= 362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/ S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124776617/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/ *http://www.thebeehive.org Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy/a./font ~- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hse5ka7/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124778537/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/*http://www.thebeehive.org"> http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hse5ka7/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124778537/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/*http://www.thebeehive.orgGet Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life -brought to you by One Economy/a./font~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Duncan RawlinsonBlog:http://thelastminute.typepad.comFeed:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheLastMinute YAHOO! GROUPS
