Re: [Vo]:How to make money with cold fusion
On 2019-07-02 02:28, Jed Rothwell wrote: So, how do you make this money? Not by trying to sell energy! That is a highly regulated industry. It is a difficult and complex business. Mine cryptocurrency.. if someone can figure out how to generate electricity, mining machines can consume as much of it as can be produced.. not $1000/mo but $millions per month, actually the only limit would be obtaining enough mining hardware. If you generate electricity in-house and burn it on crypto, you're also avoiding paying any VAT on the electricity, which might be beneficial.. Rob
Re: [Vo]:Low cost minimal Rossi-effect experiment
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 07:54:01 +1000, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 8 Jun 2014 08:09:35 -0700: Hi, [snip] This hydrogen enrichment can be accomplished with a membrane which is more porous to hydrogen than to oxygen. Many tightly woven fabrics like Gore-Tex are in this category. The idea is to split the HHO into two stream, one H-rich and the other O-rich. The H-rich steam will be ported into one end of the CC and the O-rich stream can come in from a hole drilled in the side of the CC. This separation via two steams provides a supply of hot H2 to react before it is converted to steam, but in the end, it still retains all the heat of the HHO plus the added heat of Ni-H. It is a bastardized approach but it can work. There is an even simpler method. Just use ordinary DC electrolysis, where the oxygen and hydrogen are evolved at different electrodes, resulting in a complete separation from the start. A gallium aluminium reaction might also be a good way to go; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JasZ8V6LpbQ the oxygen ends up bound to the aluminium so I think you should end up with fairly pure hydrogen gas.. I've seen other videos that used this (gallium) paste; http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/cool-laboratory-Coollaboratory-Liquid-Pro-Liquid-Metal-Thermal-Paste-/351004610402?_trksid=p2054897.l4275 just put a few drops on a strip of aluminium from an old can.. should also work for producing deuterium gas using heavy water. Rob
Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:02:33 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: I will grant that in some cases, experts are blinded by their own professional knowledge and by the bias of the field as a whole. That is why many physicists do not believe in cold fusion. But the key That's pretty much exactly the problem with climatologists- they only believe in global warming (sorry climate change) because that's what they do.. as you say the field as a whole is biased. IMO you don't need to know anything about climate science to understand global warming - it's all about politics and banking (imagine a global economy underpinned by financial products where the only underlaying deliverable is itself an intangible book keeping entry). The powers that be have decided that co2 trading is the way forward and are determined to ram it down everyone's throats. It doesn't matter if it's a pack of lies or not, they're already too invested in the idea to do anything else at this point. Rob
Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:36:50 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: IMO you dont need to know anything about climate science to understand global warming - its all about politics and banking (imagine a global economy underpinned by financial products where the only underlaying deliverable . . . Frankly, thats silly. That reminds me of assertions that oil companies are suppressing cold fusion. Or the counter-assertions by opponents that cold fusion researchers are only in it for the grant money. Believe me, there is no grant money in cold fusion! But there is for doing climate science.. maybe they're not getting rich off it, but it's better than doing cold fusion anyway ;) I know enough climatologists to know they are not living high on the hog. They do not rake in the dollars. They work long hours on tedious, demanding, boring science. I don't doubt that.. the climatologists themselves aren't going to benefit much either way (although I'm sure many of them make a modest livings out of it - and that's not nothing these days). They're merely needed to produce those tedious reports.. they just need to keep churning out talking points to keep the issue alive. The profits and power will be made by the international carbon financiers. Anticipation of these profits is what drives the global warming agenda, the climate science just a necessary part of the set. Life is not a conspiracy or a potboiler made-for-TV movie. No, it's even stranger. Rob
Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:43:59 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: Robert McKay wrote: I dont doubt that.. the climatologists themselves arent going to benefit much either way (although Im sure many of them make a modest livings out of it - and thats not nothing these days). Theyre merely needed to produce those tedious reports.. they just need to keep churning out talking points to keep the issue alive. Look, that is ridiculous. People do not act that way! A person does not spend 5 or 10 years slaving away to get a PhD without being in love with the subject. You dont do that just to get some meaningless, dead-end job churning out fake data for corporations for 60 hours a week. I'm not saying they don't believe in what they're doing.. there must be lots of legitimate data showing climate change.. the climate does change after all. The point I was making that is that the climate science is simply irrelevant to understanding global warming / the climate change issue which is better understood as a political and financial phenomenon. I'm already regreting entering the discussion.. so I'll drop it, it doesn't seem like we'll be reaching any kind of concensus. :) Rob
[Vo]:Detecting a transmutation - bismuth - polonium
Hi Vortex, I was wondering what might be the best way to try transmuting bismuth into radioactive polonium. I was thinking something along the lines of taking some bismuth powder, loading it with pressurised deuterium or hydrogen gas that had been sparked with a spark plug for a while.. any chance that some of it might turn into polonium? Maybe mix some carbon dust in there too in case that helps. Basically my thinking is that while calorimetry is tricky when dealing with low amounts of excess heat, it might be much easier to measure the presence of even tiny amounts of radioactivity. What do you think? Cheers, Rob
Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy making waves
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:05:48 -0500, James Bowery wrote: So what do you guys think? Why has Brillouin such difficulties to collect 6 million? Maybe the vortex-crowd should put their money where their mouth is, and invest. (suppressing my Homerian laughter.) As long as LENR can't be patented there is no way for it to be really profitable. Three weeks after someone comes out with a working device the e-cat will be out of the bag and you'll have dealextreme.com selling disposable LENR devices for $10.00 inc delivery. While I'm sure a few million could be recouped by 'first mover' advantage, it's never going to provide the kind of killer profits that some might imagine. Great for humanity, but bad for business. Rob
Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan drops his support of Rossi
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:10:20 -0500, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: See: http://energycatalyzer3.com/news/rossi-loses-major-supporter-lets-reporter-into-his-home For some time now it would appear that Sterling has been showing more support of DGT's efforts as compared to Rossi's. Apparently, Sterling is miffed over the allegations that Rossi sez his eCats aren't nuclear devices. ...that and the fact that the location of the hinted-at Florida factory is an apartment address. Trying to put the best face forward the above article points out that: It should also be noted that by using a home office Rossi can write off part of his home in his taxes in the US. So it makes pretty good business sense. Shoot! I sure wish I cold work from home. My wife sure does. Rossi watching can be fun. You never know what's going to happen next. It doesn't make any sense to switch to supporting DGT. The company was formed as part of the Rossi venture. Either they're both scams, or neither are. Rob
Re: [Vo]:NanoSpire Inc.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: NanoSpire, Inc. Successfully Harnesses Cavitation Zero Point Energy to Produce Dramatic Levels of Fusion Transmutation In Water press release: http://www.1888pressrelease.com/nanospire-inc-successfully-harnesses-cavitation-zero-point-pr-372884.html company website: http://www.nanospireinc.com/ From the link; The radiation emitted by the reactor left nuclear tracks, burned the hole pattern of the core into the clear PVC core enclosure, activated high neutron absorption cross-section 39Cl (56 minute half-life) in the chlorine of the PVC core enclosure and transmuted the water in the reactor into nearly all the other elements. The experiment also accidentally resulted in acute radiation sickness beginning the day after the August 25, 2009 experiments for both investigators Mark LeClair and Sergio Lebid and lasted for more than a year. At least that's a good sign that it works, maybe ;) Rob
[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Information regarding Leonardo Corporation’s Commercial License Policy
2012/2/16 Andre Blum andre_vor...@blums.nl: Nowhere does Rossi say the invoice is fabricated. He just says it is 'unvalid', which apart from not entirely correct or usual English, is a bit vague, and maybe intentionally so. (he might be conveniently hiding behind his language barrier, here, knowing he gives the impression that it is fabricated, but keeping options open in case more evidence pops up). My feeling is that the invoice is real. The rest of the message very much acknowledges that he has indeed been selling commercial licenses bound to territories, so I wouldn't know why the Byron New Energy Charity Trust couldn't be one of them. [ Nor do I understand exactly why that would incriminate Rossi much ] Agreed. See this paragraph of Rossi's post; After the interested persons sign the agreement, we send an invoice, and the agreement is deemed valid only after the payment of the license fee is done within the term agreed. If the payment is not done, the agreement expires and that invoice for which the payment has not been made is compensated in the accounting by a credit memo. So basically he seems to be saying that invoice is 'unvalid' because Byron never paid him. Rob
Re: [Vo]:Prediction on Antarctica's buried Lake
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Have you see The Stuff? Did you mean The Thing ? Rob
Re: [Vo]:Rossi lies again to cover his data fraud
Do you think others have not thought of this before? The RFG could not have imparted a power anywhere close to 10Kw. And if the SBB was supplying DC current at all, that power would still have been registered on the AC supply line. 10Kw of power is not something you can hide easily. What if the AC wall socket itself were rigged to supply the DC with a slight AC ripple? Rob
Re: [Vo]:LENR G Silver Currency
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: LENR just made petroleum obsolete. Then, currencies will be Nickel-based? Or what? bitcoin :) It makes sense actually since bitcoin relies on wasting lots of now unlimited energy. Rob
