Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:58, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. I wonder whether some suitable topologies could be worked out at a basic level with a 3d printer. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man’s technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
Has anyone tried producing this geometry via shattering of ultracold lattice material, ie immersing nickel in LNO and then confining the bulk while delivering an anvil blow? Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:58 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man's technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.commailto:hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.commailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.commailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
If you have ever looked at a DVD or blue ray disk after it has been recorded, you will notice that it reflects the light in rainbow colors. The small pits produced by the recording laser burner in the aluminum substrate beneath the .1 mm protective polycarbonate surface. Using this simple and inexpensive technology, I wonder is nano-engineering and nano-photonics may be made available to the poor man. Our computers can be programed to write data sequences to files burned onto a CD or blue ray disk as required for the sizes of the nano-structures we are interested in producing. We may then have the ability to build quantity cracks consistently every time. These cracks could be modified for experiments by simply by reconfiguring the data file that has generated them. Whereas DVD uses a 650-nanometer red laser to read information from a disc, the Blu-ray Disc format uses a shorter-wavelength, 405-nanometer blue laser. With Blu-ray, data is packed more tightly: The pinpoint focusing precision of Blu-ray's shorter-wavelength beam and the special lens allow data to be recorded into pits and marks that are less than half the size of those on DVD (a 0.32-micron track pitch, defined as the gap between tracks, for Blu-ray versus 0.74 microns for DVD). Another area of efficiency for Blu-ray lies in the short length of the data marks written to disc: about 111 nanometers on Blu-ray, and about 267 nanometers on DVD. Nickel or palladium may be sputtered on polished aluminum or with glass as a more robust substrate to replace the polycarbonate. The laser may produce micro-particles using the pits as a negative form with consistent characteristics when the glass is sputtered by our homemade magnetron. Cheers: Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man’s technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
Dr. Storms, would you be able to identify the difference between a NAE sample and a failing sample? If so, you could ask researchers to send you samples of both failures and successes and maybe you can find the signature that leads to replication at will. That would make you the most valuable LENR human on the planet, heh heh... ;-) Kevin O On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed
[Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
Hello group, Defkalion GT chief technical officer John Hadjichristos occasionally writes comments and answers questions on Peter Gluck's blog EGO OUT [1]. I think this one posted today might be worth of some attention: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2013/02/strategic-principles-of-lenr-and-their.html?showComment=1361136108932#c5631682400193533930 This paragraph in particular: [...] We have allocated already funds for common RD and theoretical interpretation to specific distinguished members or teams of the existing LENR research community, providing them full access to our experimental data and resources. Hopefully the expected results of such focusing to objectives activities will start showing up in papers within 2013. Even though experimental data and resources is most probably under various NDAs, I wonder if those selected members and teams from the existing LENR research community are are among known posters from Vortex or CMNS (a private mailing list to which I have no access) and if their involvement with DGT (that is, their exact names) is under NDAs as well. Some disclosure here would boost DGT's public image a bit. Cheers, S.A. [1] http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
I agree, no theory will cause a Western government to provide funds for LENR research for the reasons John states in the article. However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding. In other words, the CONSEQUENCE of the theory is what is important. The problem we all face is that the critical issue is not being identified. Absence of a useful theory by itself is not the problem. The problem is that we can not agree on what is important or how to solve the basic problem. The basic problem is the impossibility to cause the effect at will by anyone who tries. Yes, individuals have had success, including myself. This success is short lived and rarely replicated by another person. We had hoped this problem would be solved by Celani. His wire, if it were active, could be supplied to anyone who wanted to explore the effect. At this time, the wire does not appear to produce the claimed power. Why is this the case? A theory would answer this question. Without an answer, no one would want to risk money chasing a ghost. No, I'm not part of the effort described by John. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, Defkalion GT chief technical officer John Hadjichristos occasionally writes comments and answers questions on Peter Gluck's blog EGO OUT [1]. I think this one posted today might be worth of some attention: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2013/02/strategic-principles-of-lenr-and-their.html?showComment=1361136108932#c5631682400193533930 This paragraph in particular: [...] We have allocated already funds for common RD and theoretical interpretation to specific distinguished members or teams of the existing LENR research community, providing them full access to our experimental data and resources. Hopefully the expected results of such focusing to objectives activities will start showing up in papers within 2013. Even though experimental data and resources is most probably under various NDAs, I wonder if those selected members and teams from the existing LENR research community are are among known posters from Vortex or CMNS (a private mailing list to which I have no access) and if their involvement with DGT (that is, their exact names) is under NDAs as well. Some disclosure here would boost DGT's public image a bit. Cheers, S.A. [1] http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
*The problem is that we can not agree on what is important or how to solve the basic problem. The basic problem is the impossibility to cause the effect at will by anyone who tries. Yes, individuals have had success, including myself. This success is short lived and rarely replicated by another person. We had hoped this problem would be solved by Celani. His wire, if it were active, could be supplied to anyone who wanted to explore the effect. At this time, the wire does not appear to produce the claimed power. Why is this the case? A theory would answer this question. Without an answer, no one would want to risk money chasing a ghost*. The variability of results could be a consequence of the inexact nature of the manufacturing process. This process is inherently random. Better results may be produced if the techniques of quantum dot production where applied to the production of nano-arrays inspired by the various theories that are circulating. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dot#Production On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: I agree, no theory will cause a Western government to provide funds for LENR research for the reasons John states in the article. However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding. In other words, the CONSEQUENCE of the theory is what is important. The problem we all face is that the critical issue is not being identified. Absence of a useful theory by itself is not the problem. The problem is that we can not agree on what is important or how to solve the basic problem. The basic problem is the impossibility to cause the effect at will by anyone who tries. Yes, individuals have had success, including myself. This success is short lived and rarely replicated by another person. We had hoped this problem would be solved by Celani. His wire, if it were active, could be supplied to anyone who wanted to explore the effect. At this time, the wire does not appear to produce the claimed power. Why is this the case? A theory would answer this question. Without an answer, no one would want to risk money chasing a ghost. No, I'm not part of the effort described by John. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, Defkalion GT chief technical officer John Hadjichristos occasionally writes comments and answers questions on Peter Gluck's blog EGO OUT [1]. I think this one posted today might be worth of some attention: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.**com/2013/02/strategic-** principles-of-lenr-and-their.**html?showComment=**1361136108932#** c5631682400193533930http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2013/02/strategic-principles-of-lenr-and-their.html?showComment=1361136108932#c5631682400193533930 This paragraph in particular: [...] We have allocated already funds for common RD and theoretical interpretation to specific distinguished members or teams of the existing LENR research community, providing them full access to our experimental data and resources. Hopefully the expected results of such focusing to objectives activities will start showing up in papers within 2013. Even though experimental data and resources is most probably under various NDAs, I wonder if those selected members and teams from the existing LENR research community are are among known posters from Vortex or CMNS (a private mailing list to which I have no access) and if their involvement with DGT (that is, their exact names) is under NDAs as well. Some disclosure here would boost DGT's public image a bit. Cheers, S.A. [1] http://egooutpeters.blogspot.**com/http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
