Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release
Ryan Sonnek wrote: Hey wicket users, Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested! Where could we get sources/javadocs? Does some sort of demo exist? -- Andrew Klochkov - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] HTML ids in 2.0-SNAPHOT are being generated even when hardcoded
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet. We use it also. im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can paint yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses a hardcoded id, and later the user of that component uses it twice in a page, or puts it into a repeater you will have duplicate ids in html which is not legal, and whats worse is it will break ajax/js/css but it will be very hard to track down. Most of the time you are in full control of the markup id. In my experience it is in a rare occaission that you have to worry about reuse. Repeaters, listview are tricky, and for those I typically let Wicket generate the markup id using setOutputMarkupId. So -1 for not honoring existing markup ids. Martijn On 12/11/06, Caleb Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT for a while now and I noticed a behavior recently that is new. If I have an HTML id defined in my markup: wicket:panel div id=labels wicket:id=labels/div /wicket:panel When the panel is rendered the HTML id attribute is replaced with something that is generated by Wicket like labels40. I looked through the svn changelog for MarkupContainer and noticed that the getMarkupId() method has been changed, and the javadoc for that method that said: If the id attribute is present in the markup attributes of this component it will be used, otherwise the page-relative path of this component will be used. has been deleted... Should I be able to hard code HTML ids in the future or was that feature removed? I used hard coded HTML ids in my Page markup files I sometimes use HTML ids to reference elements from CSS and javascript and I had to use a class instead because of these generated Ids. -- Caleb Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Select All CheckBox in ListView
How do I add / use Javascript to enable a check box to select / deselect the checkboxes (as shown in attached image) beneath it within ListView? Thanks http://www.nabble.com/file/4551/checkboxes.JPG -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Select-All%22-CheckBox-in-ListView-tf2806596.html#a7830450 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Download file/ trying to use webresource using wicket 1.2 plain
Hi I've trying to use the this example:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html#BestPracticesandGotchas-Startingdownloadafterformsubmission%2528Wicket1.2%2529
WebResource export = new WebResource() {
@Override
public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
CharSequence discounts = DataBase.getInstance()
.exportDiscounts();
return new StringResourceStream(discounts, text/plain);
}
@Override
protected void setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(discounts.csv);
}
};
export.setCacheable(false);
new ResourceLink(this, exportLink, export);
My implementation (I am using wicket 1.2):
String path =
req.getSession(false).getServletContext()
.getRealPath(/report);
path+=\\+uiResult.getUrlWord().replaceAll(report/,);
final File myFile = new File(path);
WebResource export = new
WebResource() {
public IResourceStream
getResourceStream() {
return new
FileResourceStream(myFile);
}
protected void
setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(uiResult.getUrlWord().replaceAll(report/,));
}
};
export.setCacheable(false);
form.add( new
ResourceLink(word, export));
This does nothing but a page reload.
Does it only work with wicket 1.2.3, what should I do then? Use the wicket 1.1
example or ?
Regards Nino
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Associating one java file with 2 different markups
I see two options for you either use models to employ your different rules or build two entirely different components. I would go for using models since it's good practice... Somewhere I have a component that's basicly the palette component with an dropdown(either ajax based or standard postback), this component needs to call different methods depending where I use it. So I looked towards reflection package and this is probally what you are interested in. I use reflection to setup a method which I give to my component. I use models which I use for parameters on that method code snip: Heres a Snip where I use it: http://pastebin.ca/276505 Regards Nino -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11. december 2006 23:31 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Wicket-user] Associating one java file with 2 different markups Hello all, I have an issue where on the same page I have to use the same component. My application is datadriven, and those components need to have different names and different business rules that are loaded on the runtime per component. At the end of the day I want to have different htmls to be attached to be associated to the same java component. How do I do it. THank you Gennadiy - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Error in Wicket Form Ajax in IE
I have this set of markups in a form with a AjaxSubmitButton. During submit, I am supposed to send a feedback saved message to the feedback panel and also update a Table that summarizes the form data posted. In Firefox, feedback panel and Summary markups were successfully updated via Ajax but IE fails. This is the general markup: tr td/td td span wicket:id=feedback/span /td /tr tr td/td td wicket:id=summaryDetails table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th td width=72% bgcolor=#99CC00 span wicket:id=salutationList/spannbsp;span wicket:id=firstNameField/spannbsp;span wicket:id=middleNameField/spannbsp;span wicket:id=surnameField/span /td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowDate of Birth /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=dobFieldnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowState of Origin /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=originListnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowNationality/th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=nationalityListnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowMarital Status /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=maritalListnbsp;/td /tr /table /td /tr Ajax Debug in FireFox Success: INFO: INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on /nlx/home?wicket:interface=:1:bioDataForm:formTable:bioDataFormSet:saveData:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom= 0.5243824397159562 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)... INFO: Received ajax response (1795 characters) INFO: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails ![CDATA[td id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails style=display:block; table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th td width=72% bgcolor=#99CC00 spanMr./span span/span span/span span/span /td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowDate of Birth /th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowState of Origin /th td bgcolor=#99CC00FCT/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowNationality/th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowMarital Status /th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr /table /td]]/componentcomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_feedback ![CDATA[span id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_feedback bgcolor=#99CC00 ul li class=feedbackPanelINFO span class=feedbackPanelINFOUpdated Information Summary/span /li /ul /span]]/component/ajax-response INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps... INFO: Response processed successfully. INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)... However, Ajax Debug in IE6: INFO: INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on /nlx/home?wicket:interface=:1:bioDataForm:formTable:bioDataFormSet:saveData:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom= 0.579954127866638 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)... INFO: Received ajax response (1799 characters) INFO: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails ![CDATA[td id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails style=display:block; table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th td width=72% bgcolor=#99CC00 spanMr./span span/span span/span span/span /td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowDate of Birth /th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr tr
Re: [Wicket-user] Error in Wicket Form Ajax in IE
It is a known bug under IE, table elements can not be replace with OuterHtml which is used is wicketAjax implementation. This bug has been fixed : see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-143 -- Vincent Demay http://www.demay-fr.net/blog/en Ayodeji Aladejebi wrote: I have this set of markups in a form with a AjaxSubmitButton. During submit, I am supposed to send a feedback saved message to the feedback panel and also update a Table that summarizes the form data posted. In Firefox, feedback panel and Summary markups were successfully updated via Ajax but IE fails. This is the general markup: tr td/td td span wicket:id=feedback/span /td /tr tr td/td td wicket:id=summaryDetails table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th td width=72% bgcolor=#99CC00 span wicket:id=salutationList/spannbsp;span wicket:id=firstNameField/spannbsp;span wicket:id=middleNameField/spannbsp;span wicket:id=surnameField/span /td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowDate of Birth /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=dobFieldnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowState of Origin /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=originListnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowNationality/th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=nationalityListnbsp;/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowMarital Status /th td bgcolor=#99CC00 wicket:id=maritalListnbsp;/td /tr /table /td /tr Ajax Debug in FireFox Success: INFO: INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on /nlx/home?wicket:interface=:1:bioDataForm:formTable:bioDataFormSet:saveData:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom=0.5243824397159562 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)... INFO: Received ajax response (1795 characters) INFO: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails ![CDATA[td id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails style=display:block; table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th td width=72% bgcolor=#99CC00 spanMr./span span/span span/span span/span /td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowDate of Birth /th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowState of Origin /th td bgcolor=#99CC00FCT/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowNationality/th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr tr th bgcolor=#66 scope=rowMarital Status /th td bgcolor=#99CC00/td /tr /table /td]]/componentcomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_feedback ![CDATA[span id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_feedback bgcolor=#99CC00 ul li class=feedbackPanelINFO span class=feedbackPanelINFOUpdated Information Summary/span /li /ul /span]]/component/ajax-response INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps... INFO: Response processed successfully. INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)... However, Ajax Debug in IE6: INFO: INFO: Initiating Ajax POST request on /nlx/home?wicket:interface=:1:bioDataForm:formTable:bioDataFormSet:saveData:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListenerwicket:behaviorId=0wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=truerandom= 0.579954127866638 INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)... INFO: Received ajax response (1799 characters) INFO: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails ![CDATA[td id=bioDataForm_formTable_bioDataFormSet_summaryDetails style=display:block; table width=100% border=0 tr th width=28% bgcolor=#66 scope=rowFull Name /th
[Wicket-user] AjaxUpdates stops in Safari
Folks, I'm back in da house after too long time away from Wicket and started to work on a little webapp again. Have migrated to 2.0 since I like the frontier. All is well except that I have an AjaxSelfUpdating page that only updates once when using Safari (latest). All works well in Firefox though. The same problem as written about in this thread: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax- request-'hangs'-on-Safari-(Wicket-2.0)-t2243119.html - I believed that was fixed already. I'm using a 2.0-SNAPSHOT build by me yesterday. BTW, is there a 2.0- SNAPSHOT repo out there any longer? You can see the simple app running here, at least today: http:// 80.217.109.242:8080/irrigator/ Comments? Per Ejeklint: Consultant at Heimore Group AB, Kungsg. 33 11th floor, SE-111 56 Stockholm, Sweden Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mobile +4670-5090052 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxUpdates stops in Safari
Forgot to add that the code is avaliable here: http://code.google.com/p/irrigator/source Per Ejeklint wrote: Folks, I'm back in da house after too long time away from Wicket and started to work on a little webapp again. Have migrated to 2.0 since I like the frontier. All is well except that I have an AjaxSelfUpdating page that only updates once when using Safari (latest). All works well in Firefox though. The same problem as written about in this thread: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax- request-'hangs'-on-Safari-(Wicket-2.0)-t2243119.html - I believed that was fixed already. I'm using a 2.0-SNAPSHOT build by me yesterday. BTW, is there a 2.0- SNAPSHOT repo out there any longer? You can see the simple app running here, at least today: http:// 80.217.109.242:8080/irrigator/ Comments? Per Ejeklint: Consultant at Heimore Group AB, Kungsg. 33 11th floor, SE-111 56 Stockholm, Sweden Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mobile +4670-5090052 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxUpdates-stops-in-Safari-tf2807423.html#a7833494 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Download file/ trying to use webresource using wicket1.2 plain
Would some one care to comment this?
Regards Nino
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nino Wael
Sent: 12. december 2006 11:55
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Download file/ trying to use webresource using wicket1.2
plain
Hi I've trying to use the this example:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html#BestPracticesandGotchas-Startingdownloadafterformsubmission%2528Wicket1.2%2529
WebResource export = new WebResource() {
@Override
public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
CharSequence discounts = DataBase.getInstance()
.exportDiscounts();
return new StringResourceStream(discounts, text/plain);
}
@Override
protected void setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(discounts.csv);
}
};
export.setCacheable(false);
new ResourceLink(this, exportLink, export);
My implementation (I am using wicket 1.2):
String path =
req.getSession(false).getServletContext()
.getRealPath(/report);
path+=\\+uiResult.getUrlWord().replaceAll(report/,);
final File myFile = new File(path);
WebResource export = new
WebResource() {
public IResourceStream
getResourceStream() {
return new
FileResourceStream(myFile);
}
protected void
setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(uiResult.getUrlWord().replaceAll(report/,));
}
};
export.setCacheable(false);
form.add( new
ResourceLink(word, export));
This does nothing but a page reload.
Does it only work with wicket 1.2.3, what should I do then? Use the wicket 1.1
example or ?
Regards Nino
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] IntelliJ IDEA Wicket Plugin
I haven't seen the plugin in wicket-stuff yet. Have I missed it? On 12/10/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anders, Ok. So lets say that I'll transfer the code to the wicket-stuff project. How shall we/I do it and what subdir should be used? I was also thinking of a separate mailing list for the plugin developers/users and maybe a page dedicated to some intro on how to get started etc. On the other hand I just looked at the mailing activity on wicket-stuff-developers and it seems sparse. I would say create a svn directory in trunk, with the name of your plugin, or something unoriginal as 'wicket-idea-plugin'. Naming is up to you! But still I am wondering as the wicket-stuff - up till now that is - only has subprojects that extend the core wicket functionality. Also demo projects, such as wicket-flickr, wicket-phonebook. And a CMS is being developed there as well. We don't have a particular vision with respect to Wicket Stuff, as long as it is Wicket related. But offcourse that can be changed. But right now - as the front page on wicket-stuff.sf.net says - it additional components to the core components. That was until you came along :-) My sourceforge user is btw: ahnielsen You're added. Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Select All CheckBox in ListView
Found the answer in examples, http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/compref?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.compref.CheckGroupPage but the page is wrongly titled as wicket.markup.html.form.ListChoice. TH Lim wrote: How do I add / use Javascript to enable a check box to select / deselect the checkboxes (as shown in attached image) beneath it within ListView? Thanks http://www.nabble.com/file/4551/checkboxes.JPG -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Select-All%22-CheckBox-in-ListView-tf2806596.html#a7834633 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element
Invoking the Link#setEnabled( false ) on a input type=button / element will not disable the component. The onclick handler will not be invoked (disabled) but it does not apper as a disabled component. Instead invoking Button#setEnabled( false ) will render the button disabled. I think it would be simpler if it will be rendered disabled in both cases. Won't be? - Paolo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release
The source is available in the wicket-stuff subversion repository ( http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-scriptaculous/). I'll be posting examples on my blog (http://jroller.com/page/wireframe) and I'll be updating the wicket-stuff examples in subversion as well ( http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-scriptaculous-examples/ ). On 12/12/06, Andrew Klochkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Sonnek wrote: Hey wicket users, Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested! Where could we get sources/javadocs? Does some sort of demo exist? -- Andrew Klochkov - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element
Well, a Link can be attached to any HTML element so I think it can not know (in general) how to render the element disabled. A Button component can only be attached to an html button; for an html button it is known what to do. One could argue that the Link component can see what type of element it is attached to and do something appropriate. But that would blow up the implementation of Link which is probably not a good thing. Regards, Erik. Paolo Di Tommaso schreef: Invoking the Link#setEnabled( false ) on a input type=button / element will not disable the component. The onclick handler will not be invoked (disabled) but it does not apper as a disabled component. Instead invoking Button#setEnabled( false ) will render the button disabled. I think it would be simpler if it will be rendered disabled in both cases. Won't be? - Paolo -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Download file/ trying to use webresource using wicket 1.2 plain
what is the generated url? if you set a breakpoint in getResourceStream() is
it hit?
-igor
On 12/12/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I've trying to use the this example:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html#BestPracticesandGotchas-Startingdownloadafterformsubmission%2528Wicket1.2%2529
WebResource export = new WebResource() {
@Override
public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
CharSequence discounts = DataBase.getInstance()
.exportDiscounts();
return new StringResourceStream(discounts, text/plain);
}
@Override
protected void setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(discounts.csv);
}
};
export.setCacheable(false);
new ResourceLink(this, exportLink, export);
My implementation (I am using wicket 1.2):
String path = req.getSession
(false).getServletContext()
.getRealPath(/report);
path+=\\+uiResult.getUrlWord().replaceAll(report/,);
final File myFile = new
File(path);
WebResource export = new
WebResource() {
public IResourceStream
getResourceStream() {
return new
FileResourceStream(myFile);
}
protected void
setHeaders(WebResponse response) {
super.setHeaders
(response);
response.setAttachmentHeader(uiResult.getUrlWord
().replaceAll(report/,));
}
};
export.setCacheable
(false);
form.add( new
ResourceLink(word, export));
This does nothing but a page reload.
Does it only work with wicket 1.2.3, what should I do then? Use the wicket
1.1 example or ?
Regards Nino
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. Eelco Hillenius wrote: snipped I also like to state that even though we obviously think Wicket is a better alternative (and for my own taste so are GWT and Echo) to Tapestry, we don't hate Tapestry and go out harassing it's community where we can, but on the contrary usually praise it as one of the better web dev frameworks for Java. Eelco On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket: Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket! To read more see http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407 On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how bad that feels. On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it. However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see exactly who has a disturbing trend of starting a flame war. I didn't find anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type howard thinks they are :-). Iman On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a refactor of Wicket. https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be funny. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
The comments on that blog by HLS are outrageous, really. Like we stated a thousand times before, we don't have anything against Tapestry, and in fact regard it as one of the better alternatives. We can't and we won't police 'our users'. It could be any random joker putting that comment there (I can assure you it wasn't one of the comitters), and honestly, if HLS had less of an ego and a little bit thicker skin, he could have just make a joke out of it or delete the comment instead of accusing the whole Wicket community of being rowdy. Furthermore, I'm just not interested in 'managing' a project in that way. I'm glad Wicket is still about a bunch of coders trying to create a good, useable framework. Let's just keep it that way. Eelco On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
The Wicket developers have no control over what their users may or may not do. HLS is simply hypersensitive and could use some maturity, rabid Wicket users aside. On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. Eelco Hillenius wrote: snipped I also like to state that even though we obviously think Wicket is a better alternative (and for my own taste so are GWT and Echo) to Tapestry, we don't hate Tapestry and go out harassing it's community where we can, but on the contrary usually praise it as one of the better web dev frameworks for Java. Eelco On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket: Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket! To read more see http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407 On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how bad that feels. On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it. However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see exactly who has a disturbing trend of starting a flame war. I didn't find anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type howard thinks they are :-). Iman On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a refactor of Wicket. https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be funny. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
how do you know it wasnt one of tapestry's users posting that? its a conspiracy!!! -igor On 12/12/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Wicket developers have no control over what their users may or may not do. HLS is simply hypersensitive and could use some maturity, rabid Wicket users aside. On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. Eelco Hillenius wrote: snipped I also like to state that even though we obviously think Wicket is a better alternative (and for my own taste so are GWT and Echo) to Tapestry, we don't hate Tapestry and go out harassing it's community where we can, but on the contrary usually praise it as one of the better web dev frameworks for Java. Eelco On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket: Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket! To read more see http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407 On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how bad that feels. On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it. However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see exactly who has a disturbing trend of starting a flame war. I didn't find anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type howard thinks they are :-). Iman On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a refactor of Wicket. https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be funny. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
I think it may be quite the opposite. Those who cry the loudest and are quickest to get rowdy are usually ones who have the most to be defensive about. Perhaps it is partially some in the wicket area that could use some boost of maturity? After all, if wicket was the greatest thing in the world why would people need to defend it so vehemently? It would just be. I have no further comments on this as I think I've made my points known. Eelco Hillenius wrote: The comments on that blog by HLS are outrageous, really. Like we stated a thousand times before, we don't have anything against Tapestry, and in fact regard it as one of the better alternatives. We can't and we won't police 'our users'. It could be any random joker putting that comment there (I can assure you it wasn't one of the comitters), and honestly, if HLS had less of an ego and a little bit thicker skin, he could have just make a joke out of it or delete the comment instead of accusing the whole Wicket community of being rowdy. Furthermore, I'm just not interested in 'managing' a project in that way. I'm glad Wicket is still about a bunch of coders trying to create a good, useable framework. Let's just keep it that way. Eelco On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/funny--OT%7D-tf2793504.html#a7839024 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
After all, if wicket was the greatest thing in the world why would people need to defend it so vehemently? It would just be. Haha, right. I'm sure you're just making a joke here. What particular remarks do you have in mind when you say 'defend it so vehemently'? And how is your remark - you being a core developer of Tapestry - not inflammatory? Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
It's a little of both. Howard is a tad over-sensitive and he tends to make subtle yet derogatory digs at Wicket's expense. I don't really understand this as he has nothing to be defensive about with Tapestry. It's a good project and it's just getting better. The same can be said of Wicket. Unfortunately, there's no question that there are more than a few overzealous Wicket users; however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on the Wicket community itself. On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it may be quite the opposite. Those who cry the loudest and are quickest to get rowdy are usually ones who have the most to be defensive about. Perhaps it is partially some in the wicket area that could use some boost of maturity? After all, if wicket was the greatest thing in the world why would people need to defend it so vehemently? It would just be. I have no further comments on this as I think I've made my points known. Eelco Hillenius wrote: The comments on that blog by HLS are outrageous, really. Like we stated a thousand times before, we don't have anything against Tapestry, and in fact regard it as one of the better alternatives. We can't and we won't police 'our users'. It could be any random joker putting that comment there (I can assure you it wasn't one of the comitters), and honestly, if HLS had less of an ego and a little bit thicker skin, he could have just make a joke out of it or delete the comment instead of accusing the whole Wicket community of being rowdy. Furthermore, I'm just not interested in 'managing' a project in that way. I'm glad Wicket is still about a bunch of coders trying to create a good, useable framework. Let's just keep it that way. Eelco On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally like to have stick in peoples minds. There's just a sort of moral code to follow here is all. Esp. for a project in apache incubation. More people are watching you than you might think. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/funny--OT%7D-tf2793504.html#a7839024 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] 商业合作！
尊敬的客户： 您好！ 因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司的委托：将每个月票据向外提供代 开 ;我司以互惠互益解贵公司业务运作`补帐`作帐的燃眉之急;代开如下 票据服务:★普通商品/运输/广告/建筑安装/海关增值缴款书/服务业等 各种发票可以向外提供；并可上网查询或税务验证后款的方式与贵司 合作! 商琪! 手 机： 13510773029 联系人： 李 小 姐 E-mail： [EMAIL PROTECTED] 深 圳 市 俊 城 贸 易 有 限 公 司 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on the Wicket community itself. Maybe i can build a page in the core of wicket that will come up everytime, no matter what the request is, if wicket detects that the developer of the app was a rude tapestry basher. johan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
Perhaps you misread. I suggested that it ISN'T Wicket dev team's responsibility Or were you just being funny? On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on the Wicket community itself. Maybe i can build a page in the core of wicket that will come up everytime, no matter what the request is, if wicket detects that the developer of the app was a rude tapestry basher. johan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
Johan is our nbr one joker! :) Eelco On 12/12/06, Matt Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps you misread. I suggested that it ISN'T Wicket dev team's responsibility Or were you just being funny? On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on the Wicket community itself. Maybe i can build a page in the core of wicket that will come up everytime, no matter what the request is, if wicket detects that the developer of the app was a rude tapestry basher. johan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
Eelco
On 12/12/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
So far the liveliest thread I've seen on this mailing list, especially when combined with the comments at https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I've been laughing my head off since yesterday each time I read a new post from here and the blog site of Howard. It's rather unfortunate some somewhere have made this stricken their nerves too deep and hence have gotten too emotional :-). I hope in the future such a thing pops up again. Because then I could take a break from my caffeine consumption, detach myself from the glue that binds me to coding and just sit back and throw big, big laughs. All work and no laughs makes Jack a dull boy. No more war. Viva Wicket, Viva Tapestry! Francis On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Johan is our nbr one joker! :) Eelco On 12/12/06, Matt Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps you misread. I suggested that it ISN'T Wicket dev team's responsibility Or were you just being funny? On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on the Wicket community itself. Maybe i can build a page in the core of wicket that will come up everytime, no matter what the request is, if wicket detects that the developer of the app was a rude tapestry basher. johan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
On 12/12/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the liveliest thread I've seen on this mailing list, especially when combined with the comments at https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I've been laughing my head off since yesterday each time I read a new post from here and the blog site of Howard. It's rather unfortunate some somewhere have made this stricken their nerves too deep and hence have gotten too emotional :-). I hope in the future such a thing pops up again. Because then I could take a break from my caffeine consumption, detach myself from the glue that binds me to coding and just sit back and throw big, big laughs. All work and no laughs makes Jack a dull boy. No more war. Viva Wicket, Viva Tapestry! Now we have proof you caused this on purpose! I just found out that you have more mails archived on your name to the Tapestry lists then to the Wicket lists, so you are a Tapestry dude looking for trouble at the usually nice-and-peaceful Wicket lists. /me kicks Francis' tit ;0 Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}
No, I'm sorry you're wrong. I didn't cause it. With regards to my archives on Tapestry, right, I've used Tapestry in the past. And I know that holds also for many other Wicket users. In other words, I'm a Tapestry defector :-). I've used Wicket for a medium sized site about a year ago. It was a successful project and I'm going to use it for an upcoming project. So don't kick my tit- In fact, I wish I had one:-). Francis On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/12/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the liveliest thread I've seen on this mailing list, especially when combined with the comments at https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024 I've been laughing my head off since yesterday each time I read a new post from here and the blog site of Howard. It's rather unfortunate some somewhere have made this stricken their nerves too deep and hence have gotten too emotional :-). I hope in the future such a thing pops up again. Because then I could take a break from my caffeine consumption, detach myself from the glue that binds me to coding and just sit back and throw big, big laughs. All work and no laughs makes Jack a dull boy. No more war. Viva Wicket, Viva Tapestry! Now we have proof you caused this on purpose! I just found out that you have more mails archived on your name to the Tapestry lists then to the Wicket lists, so you are a Tapestry dude looking for trouble at the usually nice-and-peaceful Wicket lists. /me kicks Francis' tit ;0 Eelco - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
ahh the always nice isAssignableFrom..
How many times i had to think what was it again.. how does it work..
Why is that!
johan
On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
Eelco
On 12/12/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite
one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-161
Thanks,
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
Eelco
On 12/12/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
Hey, you saved my life Jan !
I always thought it was my problem wicket throwing exception's there. Now I
see it's Johan ! :-)
On 12/13/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Bug in SimpleConverterAdapter?
In defense of Johan, it was probably me that made the mistake :) Sorry
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, you saved my life Jan !
I always thought it was my problem wicket throwing exception's there. Now I
see it's Johan ! :-)
On 12/13/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null
(!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom( value.getClass(
...
}
Where I can fill bug report?
Jan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
