Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Gnangarra
Since was in WA would have been nice to wait until someone here had
commented before making contact

I have already emailed Len Collard, they were trying to organise a date to
talk 2/3 weeks ago

Believe WMF Philippe is also involved because of the negative use of WP
name in the press release and the use of WP name to gain $600,000 worth of
funding

Gideon




On 8 March 2014 08:42, Kerry Raymond kerry.raym...@gmail.com wrote:

   When in doubt, ask. Emailing Leonard Collard now ... watch this space ...



 Kerry




  --

 *From:* wikimediaau-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
 wikimediaau-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *
 cro0...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, 8 March 2014 10:32 AM
 *To:* Wikimedia Australia Chapter
 *Cc:* Wikimedia Australia Chapter
 *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia



 Nope I haven't heard anything as of yet - there would be something on Metaif 
 a new Wikipedia was created though.

 Steve Zhang

 Sent from my iPad


 On 8 Mar 2014, at 11:19 am, Charles Gregory wikimediaau.li...@chuq.net
 wrote:


 http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/201402116439/arts-and-culture/new-media-throw-lifeline-ancient-language



 Has anyone seen this?  Does it refer to a new website or a language
 version of Wikipedia?  (Wikipedia doesn't appear to be mentioned in the
 article but I found it from this tweet -
 https://twitter.com/IndigenousTweet/status/433230348801961985 )



 Regards,



 Charles





  ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




-- 
GN.
Vice President Wikimedia Australia
WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Charles Gregory
Hi Janet,

One thing that most of us (who are generally only English speakers) don't
take into account is that a lot of the rules that we have on Wikipedia
are actually English Wikipedia rules.  Verifiability, notability, etc
guidelines are pretty broad, but some language Wikipedias may choose to
have different standards.  It's all decided by the community for that
particular language.

Regards,

Charles



On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Janet Reid lucych...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 8 March 2014 21:54, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:

 For what it's worth, this is something I thought about a lot during my
 time involved with WMAU.

 I don't think an Indigenous language Wikipedia is going to be viable in
 the short term.


 It would be nice for there to be a way to recognise Aboriginal
 perspectives.
 Citing is likely to be a challenge.

 Once I showed some community women in Maree the page for Maree
 It said her language was extinct. She said it was not.
 I posted to the talk page that local people did still speak the language.
 But the source was a living person whereas the extinction was citing a
 published book.

 Is there a different kind of wiki project which could accommodate that
 kind of perspective/source.
 Is it possible to make articles which are relevant in their relevant
 languages?
 Not make a full wikipedia but capture descriptions of communities and
 places in the relevant language?

 just a thought

 j

 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Andrew Owens
Also I think something that, given the structure of their society and
culture, they should be driving rather than us. I'd be open to helping
Aboriginal groups who approached us for technical or other assistance. But
we must always remember it's their culture and we're outsiders. At this
stage I think it's best to leave it to the contact Gnangarra had with them
and see where that goes.

kindest regards
Andrew


On 8 March 2014 19:24, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:

 For what it's worth, this is something I thought about a lot during my
 time involved with WMAU.

 I don't think an Indigenous language Wikipedia is going to be viable in
 the short term.  Collard cites Maori and Welsh as examples of situations
 where a language has been successfully revived, and both languages have
 reasonably active Wikipediae.  But both, even during their darkest days,
 had tens of thousands of fluent speakers keeping things alive.  Noongar,
 according to the press release, has less than 300.  There are simply not
 the numbers of fluent speakers available to form a cohesive and active
 Wikipedia community for the sustained period of time that would be needed
 to produce something useful.

 Not that I don't think producing an encyclopaedia in the Noongar language
 is anything but a laudable and worthy idea, but I don't think that the
 Wikipedia model is one that is likely to bear fruit in this particular
 circumstance.  On a more practical note, to create a new language edition
 of Wikipedia there are quite a few hoops to jump through, including the
 requirement to build a test edition on the Incubator with a viable
 community, which is quite a high hurdle to jump over.

 Cheers,
 Craig

 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 11:19:50 +1100
 From: Charles Gregory wikimediaau.li...@chuq.net
 To: Wikimedia Australia Chapter wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia
 Message-ID:
 CADBtOrnpR3u1U92Sa46Kp-=
 jr8bwsjdkxodjtok4mw4zudv...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1



 http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/201402116439/arts-and-culture/new-media-throw-lifeline-ancient-language

 Has anyone seen this?  Does it refer to a new website or a language
 version
 of Wikipedia?  (Wikipedia doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article
 but
 I found it from this tweet -
 https://twitter.com/IndigenousTweet/status/433230348801961985 )

 Regards,

 Charles
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/attachments/20140308/9647bbd8/attachment-0001.html
 



 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Craig Franklin
Absolutely.  I've always been firm on this point that a bunch of
non-Indigenous people blundering into the area, even if they have the
absolute best and purest of intentions, will almost certainly end up doing
more harm than good.  Leonard Collard, the Professor who is driving this,
is actually an elder of the Noongar people, so he's a lot better qualified
to determine what's culturally appropriate than we are.

Cheers,
Craig


On 8 March 2014 22:40, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:

 Also I think something that, given the structure of their society and
 culture, they should be driving rather than us. I'd be open to helping
 Aboriginal groups who approached us for technical or other assistance. But
 we must always remember it's their culture and we're outsiders. At this
 stage I think it's best to leave it to the contact Gnangarra had with them
 and see where that goes.

 kindest regards
 Andrew


 On 8 March 2014 19:24, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:

 For what it's worth, this is something I thought about a lot during my
 time involved with WMAU.

 I don't think an Indigenous language Wikipedia is going to be viable in
 the short term.  Collard cites Maori and Welsh as examples of situations
 where a language has been successfully revived, and both languages have
 reasonably active Wikipediae.  But both, even during their darkest days,
 had tens of thousands of fluent speakers keeping things alive.  Noongar,
 according to the press release, has less than 300.  There are simply not
 the numbers of fluent speakers available to form a cohesive and active
 Wikipedia community for the sustained period of time that would be needed
 to produce something useful.

 Not that I don't think producing an encyclopaedia in the Noongar language
 is anything but a laudable and worthy idea, but I don't think that the
 Wikipedia model is one that is likely to bear fruit in this particular
 circumstance.  On a more practical note, to create a new language edition
 of Wikipedia there are quite a few hoops to jump through, including the
 requirement to build a test edition on the Incubator with a viable
 community, which is quite a high hurdle to jump over.

 Cheers,
 Craig

 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 11:19:50 +1100
 From: Charles Gregory wikimediaau.li...@chuq.net
 To: Wikimedia Australia Chapter wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia
 Message-ID:
 CADBtOrnpR3u1U92Sa46Kp-=
 jr8bwsjdkxodjtok4mw4zudv...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1



 http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/201402116439/arts-and-culture/new-media-throw-lifeline-ancient-language

 Has anyone seen this?  Does it refer to a new website or a language
 version
 of Wikipedia?  (Wikipedia doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article
 but
 I found it from this tweet -
 https://twitter.com/IndigenousTweet/status/433230348801961985 )

 Regards,

 Charles
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/attachments/20140308/9647bbd8/attachment-0001.html
 



 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l



___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Craig Franklin
Oh, and on the other topic you raise, you're thinking of Oral citations.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research%3aOral_Citations

Unfortunately, it didn't end happily on English Wikipedia as it was just
too much of a cultural leap for everyone to make, which is why you don't
see them anymore.

Cheers,
Craig


On 8 March 2014 22:40, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:

 Also I think something that, given the structure of their society and
 culture, they should be driving rather than us. I'd be open to helping
 Aboriginal groups who approached us for technical or other assistance. But
 we must always remember it's their culture and we're outsiders. At this
 stage I think it's best to leave it to the contact Gnangarra had with them
 and see where that goes.

 kindest regards
 Andrew


___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Gnangarra
Oral histories are better being recorded, stored separately and then used
for citation of quotes rather than pure reference sources, I think creating
a Wikitionary Noongar language would be a better fit with en articles
covering noongar stories and inclusion of Noongar stories, names etc in
already existing articles


On 8 March 2014 20:47, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:

 Oh, and on the other topic you raise, you're thinking of Oral citations.

 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research%3aOral_Citations

 Unfortunately, it didn't end happily on English Wikipedia as it was just
 too much of a cultural leap for everyone to make, which is why you don't
 see them anymore.

 Cheers,
 Craig


 On 8 March 2014 22:40, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:

 Also I think something that, given the structure of their society and
 culture, they should be driving rather than us. I'd be open to helping
 Aboriginal groups who approached us for technical or other assistance. But
 we must always remember it's their culture and we're outsiders. At this
 stage I think it's best to leave it to the contact Gnangarra had with them
 and see where that goes.

 kindest regards
 Andrew


 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




-- 
GN.
Vice President Wikimedia Australia
WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Bruce White
Hey all

Just as an observation regarding the possibilities and potential for an 
Aboriginal Australian peoples kind project (see below):

1.   the native title determination processes generate a lot of detailed 
research around the manner and extend to which original Aboriginal 'societies' 
continue and persist into the present ,, often involving research and expert 
opinion by some very prominent anthropologists, historians, and linguists

2.  the native title determination processes are progressively generating 
detailed research, and for every successful determination, that are semi pubic 
claimant statements (giving local Aboriginal expert opinion), plus reports that 
are filed in Court to support claims, and are semi-public/ not priveledged  ,,

..  being information that the Aboriginal corporations whom the courts decide 
should hold particular native title generally hold, and can use as they see fit

3.  would be interesting project/exercise to write to all the existing 
Aboriginal corporations holding native title (called registered prescribed 
bodies corporate), details of which are publicly available on the Office of the 
Registrar of Indigenous Corporations (ORIC) website   ..  inviting them to have 
Wikipedia articles ,, where the Federal Court has publicly detemined  they are 
Aboriginal societies/ peoples  (native title determinations are available on 
the Austlii website) ,, being articles for which we would like them to make 
witness statements and reports available

Could be an interesting project, not only putting an Aboriginal perspective and 
record of research into Wikipedia/ the world ,,  but also progressively 
displaying formal Federal Court determinations of the continuing existence of 
Aboriginal socieities in Australia ,, being contemporary Aboriginal peoples of 
Australia??

Currently very busy actually working on one of the native title claims in the 
North-East Queensland area .. but would be interested in assisting an exercise 
of this kind in couple of months time ,,  should it be thought generally 
viable, agreeable etc

Just some thoughts and observations ,, likely to reinvigorate my own editorial 
contributions to Wikipedia where haven't added anything for quite some time now

Bruce  [username: bruceanthro]



On Sat, 8/3/14, Janet Reid lucych...@gmail.com wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia
 To: cfrank...@halonetwork.net, Wikimedia Australia Chapter 
wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Received: Saturday, 8 March, 2014, 10:52 PM
 
 On 8 March 2014 21:54, Craig
 Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net
 wrote:
 
 For what it's worth, this is something I
 thought about a lot during my time involved with WMAU.
 
 I don't think an Indigenous language
 Wikipedia is going to be viable in the short term.
  
 It would be nice for there to be a way to
 recognise Aboriginal perspectives.
 Citing is likely to be a challenge.
 
 Once I showed some community women in Maree the
 page for MareeIt said her language was extinct.
 She said it was not.
 I posted to the talk page that local people did still speak
 the language.But
 the source was a living person whereas the extinction was
 citing a published book.
 
 Is there a
 different kind of wiki project which could accommodate that
 kind of perspective/source.Is it possible to make
 articles which are relevant in their relevant
 languages?
 Not make a full wikipedia but capture descriptions of
 communities and places in the relevant language?
 just a thought
 j
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
 

___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Creation of Noongar (Aboriginal) Wikipedia

2014-03-08 Thread Pru Mitchell
Interesting that the question about whether oral history was a valid source 
came up at yesterday`s Paralympics workshop in Melbourne (great day by the way 
for anyone who can get to today`s session).

If someone publishes an oral history do they usually verify facts before 
publishing? We thought not.
Cheers, Pru
Pru Mitchell
pru.mitch...@gmail.com


 On 8 Mar 2014, at 11:37 pm, Andrew Owens orderinchao...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 that's a very valid point. I heard something a while ago about an initiative 
 between India and South Africa supported by WMF which was collecting oral 
 information from elders in those places in such a way that it could be used 
 as a verifiable source on Wikipedia on topics not readily covered by regular 
 secondary sources.
 
 kindest regards
 Andrew
 
 
 On 8 March 2014 19:52, Janet Reid lucych...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 8 March 2014 21:54, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
 For what it's worth, this is something I thought about a lot during my time 
 involved with WMAU.
 
 I don't think an Indigenous language Wikipedia is going to be viable in the 
 short term.  
 
 It would be nice for there to be a way to recognise Aboriginal perspectives.
 Citing is likely to be a challenge.
 
 Once I showed some community women in Maree the page for Maree
 It said her language was extinct. She said it was not.
 I posted to the talk page that local people did still speak the language.
 But the source was a living person whereas the extinction was citing a 
 published book.
 
 Is there a different kind of wiki project which could accommodate that kind 
 of perspective/source.
 Is it possible to make articles which are relevant in their relevant 
 languages?
 Not make a full wikipedia but capture descriptions of communities and places 
 in the relevant language?
 
 just a thought
 
 j
 
 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
 
 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l