Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/22/06, Angela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 3/22/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't
  even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how
  long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?)

 This isn't currently with the Board, so I'm assuming the chapters
 committee, along with legal support, are looking at them. What I'd
 expect to happen is for them to present a report and recommendation to
 the Foundation Board who would then simply vote whether or not to
 approve the chapter.

Okay, thanks for this update!
Regards
Michael
 Angela.

 --
 Angela Beesley
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Ilario Valdelli
The distance isn't a problem.

In the past I was anywhere in Europe in any time for my job (Aachen,
Bruxelles, Madrid, etc.), to go from Lugano to Zürich is like to go
shopping at closest favourite supermarket ;)

But it's logical that if this favourite supermarket is closer than
another I'd like it.

Ilario

 
 Um, yes, Ilario will have to cross this bloody alps anyway, whether
 we'll go to Berne or Luzern... But I don't care about where to go
 myself, from ZH you're quite fast everywhere.
  Cheers,
 
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Patrick Kenel

You're right. In such a small country like Switzerland it shouldn't be problematic to gather people from every corner in any place for a meeting. It would be a serious problem in Germany, Italy or France for example. So I would say,Zurich is definitely central enough for everybody.
Patrick




From:"Ilario Valdelli" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:Mailing list for Wikimedia Swizerland wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.orgTo:"Mailing list for Wikimedia Swizerland" wikimediach-l@wikipedia.orgSubject:Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?Date:Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:54:13 +0100The distance isn't a problem.In the past I was anywhere in Europe in any time for my job (Aachen,Bruxelles, Madrid, etc.), to go from Lugano to Zürich is like to goshopping at closest favourite supermarket ;)But it's logical that if this favourite supermarket is closer thananother I'd like it.IlarioUm, yes, Ilario will have to cross this bloody alps anyway, 
whether  we'll go to Berne or Luzern... But I don't care about where to go  myself, from ZH you're quite fast everywhere.   Cheers,  ___Wikimediach-l mailing listWikimediach-l@Wikipedia.orghttp://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l

___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Manuel Schneider [Everything Open]
Patrick,

could you please, please deactivate that bloody HTML format in your mails?
All mailinglists would be very glad.

Thank you,


Manuel

-- 
-
All-Things-Open Projektgruppe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCM d-- s:- a? C++$ UL P+ L+++$ E- W+++$ N+ o-- K- w--$ O+ M+ V
PS+ PE- Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R UF !tv b+ DI D+ G+ e h r y++ 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


[Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Patrick Kenel
Hi all!

I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought aboutto procede to the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation somewhen in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of March, it seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a meeting in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November.The foundation assembly would (hopefully) alsobea welcome opportunity to meet people who couldn'tattend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, Thierry Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate onthisML(Voyager, Ilja, Javier).

Greets,Patrick

___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Ilario Valdelli
Hi Patrick,
if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
and someone can have an answer to his own questions.

Best Regards

Ilario

On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all!

 I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought about to procede to
 the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're
 establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia
 Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation somewhen
 in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of March, it
 seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a meeting
 in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November. The
 foundation assembly would (hopefully) also be a welcome opportunity to meet
 people who couldn't attend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, Thierry
 Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate on this ML
 (Voyager, Ilja, Javier).

 Greets, Patrick
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't
even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how
long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?) and before the
bylaws are approved, we can forget about making a founding assembly. I
mean, we can certainly say, that we make the assembly at April XY but
if the bylaws are not ready yet then, we can again postpone
everything...
(BTW: I would certainly be glad with Zurich...)
Regards
Michael

On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all!

 I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought about to procede to
 the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're
 establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia
 Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation somewhen
 in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of March, it
 seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a meeting
 in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November. The
 foundation assembly would (hopefully) also be a welcome opportunity to meet
 people who couldn't attend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, Thierry
 Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate on this ML
 (Voyager, Ilja, Javier).

 Greets, Patrick
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l





--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Patrick,
 if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
 organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
 and someone can have an answer to his own questions.

I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
that afterwards a foundation protocol is signed by president + one
board member (usually secretary/aktuar). So it won't work to do this
virtually on IRC.
But if you meant to do the date-and-lieu-fixing on IRC we could
certainly do this, however I think, some people here might be not so
experienced with IRC:
 Best Regards

Regards
Michael
 Ilario

 On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all!
 
  I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought about to procede to
  the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're
  establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia
  Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation somewhen
  in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of March, it
  seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a meeting
  in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November. The
  foundation assembly would (hopefully) also be a welcome opportunity to meet
  people who couldn't attend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, Thierry
  Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate on this ML
  (Voyager, Ilja, Javier).
 
  Greets, Patrick
  ___
  Wikimediach-l mailing list
  Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
  http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
 
 
 
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Frederic Schutz
Michael Bimmler wrote:

 I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
 founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
 can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
 Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
 that afterwards a foundation protocol is signed by president + one
 board member (usually secretary/aktuar).

No, AFAIK. There are very few conditions imposed on associations; most 
of the conditions are imposed by the bylaws (with a set of defaults if 
needed). The only condition that would be slightly related is that the 
bylaws must be on paper, which does not mean anything for the actual 
meeting. But in any case, not having a physical meeting for the founding 
assembly would not be a good idea (to say the least).

As for the place -- as much as I had no preference for the postal 
address, here I would strongly push for a central location, e.g. Bern.

Frédéric

___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Ilario Valdelli
The second reply :)

I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we
had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this
through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like
developers (for board's meeting I know that the physical presence is a
must).

Best Regards

Ilario

On 3/21/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Patrick,
  if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
  organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
  and someone can have an answer to his own questions.
 
 I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
 founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
 can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
 Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
 that afterwards a foundation protocol is signed by president + one
 board member (usually secretary/aktuar). So it won't work to do this
 virtually on IRC.
 But if you meant to do the date-and-lieu-fixing on IRC we could
 certainly do this, however I think, some people here might be not so
 experienced with IRC:
  Best Regards
 
 Regards
 Michael
  Ilario
 
  On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi all!
  
   I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought about to procede to
   the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're
   establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia
   Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation somewhen
   in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of March, 
   it
   seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a meeting
   in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November. The
   foundation assembly would (hopefully) also be a welcome opportunity to 
   meet
   people who couldn't attend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, 
   Thierry
   Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate on this ML
   (Voyager, Ilja, Javier).
  
   Greets, Patrick
   ___
   Wikimediach-l mailing list
   Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
   http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
  
  
  
  ___
  Wikimediach-l mailing list
  Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
  http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
 


 --
 Regards
 Michael Bimmler
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l

___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Michael Bimmler wrote:

  I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
  founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
  can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
  Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
  that afterwards a foundation protocol is signed by president + one
  board member (usually secretary/aktuar).

 No, AFAIK. There are very few conditions imposed on associations; most
 of the conditions are imposed by the bylaws (with a set of defaults if
 needed). The only condition that would be slightly related is that the
 bylaws must be on paper, which does not mean anything for the actual
 meeting. But in any case, not having a physical meeting for the founding
 assembly would not be a good idea (to say the least).

I have googled a bit and found the following sources (not legal
sources, but at least...) however they are all in german:
http://vereinsfuehrung.fvrz.ch/de/3/Gruend_1161.asp
http://www.bl.ch/docs/jpd/handreg/infos/vereine/gruendung_weg.htm
http://www.swissbudo-portal.ch/wDeutsch/recht/vereinsrecht/vereinsgruendung.shtml

The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the
second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating,
... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to
be signed by the protocollist.

 As for the place -- as much as I had no preference for the postal
 address, here I would strongly push for a central location, e.g. Bern.

Well, I'm okay with that as well. Just ad central: Wouldn't Lucerne
be more central? (AFAIK nobody on this list lives in one of these two
cities, so question is how to organise it...)
 Frédéric

MIchael
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The second reply :)

Ah, I see.
 I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we
 had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this
 through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like
 developers (for board's meeting I know that the physical presence is a
 must).

Hm, I don't think, that for BOARD meetings, physical presence is
necessary (afaik WMF board and WmDE Board both have IRC meetings and
physical meetings are quite extraordinary), but I think that it is
necessary for FOUNDING ASSEMBLY, see other post
 Best Regards

Regards
Michael
 Ilario

 On 3/21/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi Patrick,
   if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
   organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
   and someone can have an answer to his own questions.
  
  I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
  founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
  can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
  Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
  that afterwards a foundation protocol is signed by president + one
  board member (usually secretary/aktuar). So it won't work to do this
  virtually on IRC.
  But if you meant to do the date-and-lieu-fixing on IRC we could
  certainly do this, however I think, some people here might be not so
  experienced with IRC:
   Best Regards
  
  Regards
  Michael
   Ilario
  
   On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Hi all!
   
I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought about to procede 
to
the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're
establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the 
Wikipedia
Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation 
somewhen
in February or March. Now that we're already in the second half of 
March, it
seems still unclear when this is going to happen. I would favour a 
meeting
in Zurich where we already spent a calm Sunday afternoon in November. 
The
foundation assembly would (hopefully) also be a welcome opportunity to 
meet
people who couldn't attend last time (Ilario, Gatto Nero, Frédéric, 
Thierry
Pool, Christian Seidl, Irmgard etc.) or who didn't participate on this 
ML
(Voyager, Ilja, Javier).
   
Greets, Patrick
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
   
   
   
   ___
   Wikimediach-l mailing list
   Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
   http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
  
 
 
  --
  Regards
  Michael Bimmler
  ___
  Wikimediach-l mailing list
  Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
  http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
 
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Frederic Schutz
Michael Bimmler wrote:

 The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the
 second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating,
 ... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to
 be signed by the protocollist.

Fair enough; even if the physical meeting is not prescribed by the 
law, I doubt that many people would have used this option anyway.

As for the place -- as much as I had no preference for the postal
address, here I would strongly push for a central location, e.g. Bern.

 
 Well, I'm okay with that as well. Just ad central: Wouldn't Lucerne
 be more central? (AFAIK nobody on this list lives in one of these two
 cities, so question is how to organise it...)

Geographically, probably (if I remember well, the exact center of 
Switzerland is somewhere in Nidwald :-), but I was reasonning in terms 
of train connections: there are direct trains to Bern from most big 
cities, definitively not to Luzern (those bloody Alps...)

Cheers,

Frédéric
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Michael Bimmler wrote:

  The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the
  second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating,
  ... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to
  be signed by the protocollist.

 Fair enough; even if the physical meeting is not prescribed by the
 law, I doubt that many people would have used this option anyway.

 As for the place -- as much as I had no preference for the postal
 address, here I would strongly push for a central location, e.g. Bern.
 
 
  Well, I'm okay with that as well. Just ad central: Wouldn't Lucerne
  be more central? (AFAIK nobody on this list lives in one of these two
  cities, so question is how to organise it...)

 Geographically, probably (if I remember well, the exact center of
 Switzerland is somewhere in Nidwald :-), but I was reasonning in terms
 of train connections: there are direct trains to Bern from most big
 cities, definitively not to Luzern (those bloody Alps...)

Um, yes, Ilario will have to cross this bloody alps anyway, whether
we'll go to Berne or Luzern... But I don't care about where to go
myself, from ZH you're quite fast everywhere.
 Cheers,

Michael
 Frédéric
 ___
 Wikimediach-l mailing list
 Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
 http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l



--
Regards
Michael Bimmler
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l


Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Angela
On 3/22/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't
 even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how
 long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?)

This isn't currently with the Board, so I'm assuming the chapters
committee, along with legal support, are looking at them. What I'd
expect to happen is for them to present a report and recommendation to
the Foundation Board who would then simply vote whether or not to
approve the chapter.

Angela.

--
Angela Beesley
___
Wikimediach-l mailing list
Wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l