Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet5-HP

2009-07-21 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
We are doing close to 70meg TCP with MTs.  All depends on the links..

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Robert West wrote:
 Has anyone got their hands on the 1 watt Bullet5-HP yet?  Is it all hype?
 I'm  tempted to buy a couple at 89 bucks per, that is if anyone had some in
 stock.  I have 2 backhauls to install in the next couple of weeks and
 normally go with a Mikrotik board with a XR5 card.  If the specs are right,
 I could possibly do it at half the cost.  Any thoughts???

  

  

  

  

  

 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
 Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:55 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 802.11 CPE's

  

 also...

 Butche Evans
 CTI
 Streakwave

 Brian

 Josh Luthman wrote: 

 IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER:
  
 Roc Noc
 Quicklink Wireless
 Pasadena Networks
 WISP Router
 Titan Wireless
 TenX Networks
  
 Done business with them all and I am happy.
  
 On 7/20/09, Mike  mailto:m...@aweiowa.com m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
   

 Looking for a good MT vendor.  The fellow I've been trying to work
 with has gone AWOL.  I need to get a link going for a community
 project pretty quickly.
  
 Regards,
  
 Mike
  
  
  
  
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
 

  
   


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Candidate Replies Requested

2009-07-13 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
First, I would like to thank everyone for the support they have shown me 
as well as the great relationships I have made as a board and committee 
member with WISPA.  I am sure I can continue to serve the WISP community 
with WISPA, and I do look forward to doing so!   There are some 
questions that were posted to the candidates, and with the election 
looming, I wanted to make sure I addressed those!

Since some of you do not know me, I wished to give you some background. 

*/Dennis Burgess Bio/*

Dennis Burgess has been in the service provider business since 1992 when 
he started his first BBS.  This system grew to one of the larger BBS 
systems in the St. Louis area.  After testing out of several classes in 
college he graduated from Vatterott Technical College in 1997, 5 months 
early.  He obtained a Associates in Computer Electronics and another in 
Networking Technologies from Vatterott. Mr. Burgess was hired before 
graduation by a local IT Consulting company.  During the next few years 
Dennis worked for large construction firms, law offices, and other 
manufacturing businesses in and around Missouri and Illinois under 
several Consulting firms.  Typically he worked as a Network 
Administrator, Network Engineer and/or Project Engineer.  Typical 
projects were rolling out large shared server systems, clustered mail 
and terminal servers, as well a complete network router/engineering 
support for many clients.Dennis also worked for a group of 
Harley-Davidson Dealerships that had very minimal networking between 
their locations to a full business-grade network including centralized 
management, support services and programmers on-staff as the Director of 
Information Technologies.Mr. Burgess then started his own Wireless 
ISP service in the Festus and Hillsboro, MO area, that serviced the 
under serviced areas with high-speed internet access.  This Wireless ISP 
was sold and later merged with other businesses.  While running his 
WISP, Dennis also created a new company, Link Technologies, Inc. 

Link Technologies, Inc serves hundreds of Wireless and Non-Wireless 
Internet Service Providers around the USA, Canada, South America, 
Austria la, Europe and even Africa.  Link Technologies, Inc is a full 
service Mikrotik and routing support company that focuses on Mikrotik 
RouterOS as well as any other internet routing systems that their 
customers have a need for.  LTI also has deployed and worked with 
companies  such as CenturyTel, The US Navy, The Department of Homeland 
Security, and other large Internet providers around the USA.  Most of 
the work focuses on network design, network engineering, project 
management, network deployment and RF Engineering.  These include RF 
Path Analysis, Site Surveys and major network build-outs.

*What do you see as the top 3 priority items that need to be addressed 
by WISPA?

*
First and foremost, we need to ensure a high quality organization.  To 
do this, we will need a dedicated person to the WISPA organization 
handing calls, ,managing memberships, as well as actively recruiting new 
members!  This is the future of WISPA, as it has been with many other 
organizations!  This will give WISPA the direction that it needs to go 
into the future by better maintaining WISPAs relationship with its most 
important asset, its members! 

Increasing membership is another goal!  To hire dedicated personnel, 
move froward with FCC and other hot topics that WISPs need to have a 
hand in costs! Raising dues could be used to create more income, 
however, being able to represent the majority of WISPs in the US would 
be a much better goal.  Not only would we have increased revenue from 
increased membership, but also the increased membership would be a 
significant resource for both existing and future members as well.  It 
would be nice to be able to say that WISPA represents 90+% of the known 
WISPS in the USA! 

Increasing that membership is good, but what will get those members to 
join!  Value!  We already have a very low cost of joining, however, that 
alone is not enough.  We need to have resources!  These resources are 
part of what the WISPA.ORG website as well as the new WIKI site is all 
about.  Members will have access to more resources in the future  and by 
us developing those resources, we will ensure that new members get the 
value they need out of WISPA to join! 

*What the the greatest hurdles faced by the WISPA industry in the short 
term?  In the long Term?

*Growing pains!  The next board will place many new seeds with the way 
WISPA operates.   WISPA operates as a completely volunteer organization 
right now, and in the future it will be able to better attend to its 
members by having the dedicated staff that the organization needs.  This 
growth shows the change from a cowboy attitude to a more professional 
organization with dedicated staff and member resources.

*There has been a great deal of debate about the dues structure -- what 
do you 

[WISPA] On-line Chat

2009-07-13 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Just wished to tell everyone that I will be on-line for the next hour or 
two, maybe more in the WISPA chat page.Anyone wish to join me?  
http://www.wispa.org/wispa-chat/ 

I also would like to make sure I tell everyone that I will be on-line as 
well tomorrow around 9:30 AM CST as well if their are any questions that 
pertains to the upcoming elections! 
-- 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Routerboard 333 vs 433

2009-07-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Also note that 333s are going by the wayside too.  The 400 series is 
really the main workhorse right now. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Kevin Neal wrote:
 http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008pps.pdf

 Well, pps wise, it looks like the 433 is around 80kpps and the 433 ah
 is around 140kpps.  Best performance pps that the 333 can do is
 80kpps.

 -Kevin


 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Josh
 Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
   
 Kevin's link
 http://www.routerboard.com/pdf/tests_jan_2008mbps.pdf

 says the 333 dominates over the 532 (per MikroTik's testing)

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:

 
  Thanks for all the comments...

 I have RB 112,133,230,333,411,433,532 in service.

 I've lost two 532's to on board power supply failure, one 532 to a direct
 lighting strike.

 I've lost one 112 to Ethernet port failure, and a 133 to unknown causes

 My 333's, 411's and 433's have been flawless.

 I'm mainly looking for pps differences between the 333 and 433.


  Josh Luthman wrote:

 Well the boot times of the 532 are superior to any other routerboard I've
 used.  Don't know how that reflects on it's performance in PPS as it could
 simply be a faster storage device.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Kevin Neal ke...@safelink.net 
 ke...@safelink.net wrote:



  We have the 333 deployed in a bunch of situations, they work pretty
 well for us, but, for the price go for the 433.  532's were ok,
 they're old style now and don't have the near the performance of the
 3xx or 4xx boards.


 -Kevin



 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Scott Reedscottr...@onlyinternet.net 
 scottr...@onlyinternet.net
 wrote:


  No hard data, but I have replaced 532 and 532A with 333 and seen better
 link performance.  I have replaced 333 with 433 and seen no real
 difference.  Replacing 333 with 433AH probably does, but I really don't
 have any evidence.

 Blair Davis wrote:


  anybody got any real world experience of the performance difference
 between the RB 333 vs the RB 433?

 The 333 has a 333MHz PowerPC and the 433 has a Atheros AR7130
 300MHz...But which is faster in the real world?

 How about the RB 532A with the MIPS 32 4kc at 266MHz?

 Hard to compare different CPU's by clock speed.

 Blair


 






  
 


  WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

  
 


  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.8/2224 - Release Date:


  07/08/09 05:53:00


   --
 Scott Reed
 Sr. Systems Engineer
 GAB Midwest
 1-800-363-1544 x4000
 Cell: 260-273-7239






  
 


  WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/


 


  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 

Re: [WISPA] OT: Cordless VOIP Phone

2009-07-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Drop in a ATA and plug it into a cheap cordless phone :) 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Gino Villarini wrote:
 Got a Customer that needs a Cordless VOIP phone for itd retail stores,
 any recommendations? DECT 6 
  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 g...@aeronetpr.com 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP

2009-07-02 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Ahh, are you distributing connected routes?  If not, then until 
something connects, won't do anything :)

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Scott Reed wrote:
 Nothing associated on the Virtual. 
 The propagation was back out via the wire interface.
 I would not think it should matter if anything is connected.  The 
 interface is active, it has an address.  That address range should be 
 propagated by OSPF.  I will be at the site tomorrow.  I will connect to 
 the VirtualAP and see if that matters.


 Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
   
 Is something connected to the VAP?  Why would it send if its on the 
 physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap.

 * ---
 Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 WISPA Vendor Member*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
 http://www.linktechs.net/
 */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

 The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
 Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
 for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
 it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
 review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
 action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than 
 the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
 received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
 from any computer.

  



 Scott Reed wrote:
   
 
 Yep, that is what I said in the original post.
 Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation.
 Put it on the physical and it propagates.  So the question is, why does 
 the route not propagate from the VirtualAP?  And is that corrected in v3.x?
 I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. 
 I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what 
 happens.

 Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
   
 
   
 A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something 
 else, it will have to have an IP to communicate!

 * ---
 Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 WISPA Vendor Member*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
 http://www.linktechs.net/
 */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

 The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
 Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 
 only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
 it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
 Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
 any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 
 than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
 received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
 from any computer.

  



 Scott Reed wrote:
   
 
   
 
 I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49.  I have not found 
 a way to get it to forward the route.  As soon as I put the address on 
 the physical interface, the route propagates.  Any one know if this can 
 be made to work?

 If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work?

   
 
   
 
   
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http

Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP

2009-07-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something 
else, it will have to have an IP to communicate!

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Scott Reed wrote:
 I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49.  I have not found 
 a way to get it to forward the route.  As soon as I put the address on 
 the physical interface, the route propagates.  Any one know if this can 
 be made to work?

 If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work?

   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP

2009-07-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Is something connected to the VAP?  Why would it send if its on the 
physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap.

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Scott Reed wrote:
 Yep, that is what I said in the original post.
 Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation.
 Put it on the physical and it propagates.  So the question is, why does 
 the route not propagate from the VirtualAP?  And is that corrected in v3.x?
 I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. 
 I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what 
 happens.

 Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
   
 A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something 
 else, it will have to have an IP to communicate!

 * ---
 Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 WISPA Vendor Member*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
 http://www.linktechs.net/
 */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

 The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
 Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
 for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
 it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
 review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
 action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than 
 the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
 received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
 from any computer.

  



 Scott Reed wrote:
   
 
 I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49.  I have not found 
 a way to get it to forward the route.  As soon as I put the address on 
 the physical interface, the route propagates.  Any one know if this can 
 be made to work?

 If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work?

   
 
   
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 
 05:53:00

   
 

   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] dual ethernte port router

2009-06-26 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Nope, can do dynamic in 4 :) 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Josh Luthman wrote:
 Like 2?  RBs comes with 3 or 4.  The 450 includes the license you need
 for STATIC routing.  Dynamic routing needs 4 I believe.

 On 6/26/09, Alan Long alan.l...@aerowire.net wrote:
   
 So what level license will I need just to do routing?

 
 Aerowire
 Alan Long
 Director of Network Operations
 alan.l...@aerowire.net
 687 North Dean Road
 Auburn, AL 36830
 tel: 3342759998
 mobile: 336092
 

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:57 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] dual ethernte port router

 I've been putting in the 9 port (yeah I know it's more than you want but
 that gives you more power and memory) MT units.  They are AMAZING.  So
 far.

 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Alan Long alan.l...@aerowire.net
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:59 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] dual ethernte port router


 
 Anyone have a suggestion for a dual ethernet port router, that can handle
 30-50mb/s of traffic. I do not need it to do nat or anything like that,
 just
 need it to route..I have looked at a cisco 2811..but know there are other
 options..Thanks for any help.







 http://www.aerowire.net







 Alan Long
 Director of Network Operations

 Aerowire


   
 http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=687+North+Dean+Roadcsz=Aubu
 
 rn%2C+AL+36830country=us 687 North Dean Road
 Auburn, AL 36830


 mailto:alan.l...@aerowire.net alan.l...@aerowire.net


 tel:
 mobile:



   
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=3342759998E
 
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 3342759998


   
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=336092E
 
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 336092







   
 https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=30065206883src=client_sig_212_1_card_joini
 
 nvite=1=en Always have my latest info

 http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig=en Want a
 signature like this?




   
 
 


 

   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.92/2202 - Release Date: 06/25/09
 17:58:00



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall

2009-06-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Agreed.  MT is a high quality product, and looks nice in a rack.
 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Josh Luthman wrote:
 Typically if you're protecting it versus someone who knows what they're
 doing it's the software that's open (pop/imap/smtp/web/etc) that becomes the
 vulnerability, not the network.

 If it were me, I would use MikroTik.  If there is a break I can troubleshoot
 it 100x faster and easier with MT then anything else.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Patrick D.. Nix, Jr 
 pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:

   
 Yes, I use mikrotik for end user protection and routing but I'm not sure
 that will fit the bill here.  I think I may need more of a corporate
 type solution.  I've used Watchguard and cisco products in the past but
 I thought maybe I could save some $$ and go with a linux homebrew

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:44 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall

 Maybe you could provide more detail as to your application.

 In most situations I agree with Gino, MikroTik.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
 wrote:

 
 Mikrotik


 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
   
 On
 
 Behalf Of Patrick D.. Nix, Jr
 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:30 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall

 Any suggestions on a good linux firewall distro.  I'm looking at
   
 either
 
 implementing this or going with an older Cisco PIX 525.  Which would
   
 be
 
 the best way to go?  Something with a nice GUI would be good



 Thanks




   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Mesh Network

2009-06-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Can do everything on this, but the cost.  Looks like around $515 in 
single unit pricing.  Shoot me a call if you have questions.

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Jerry Richardson wrote:
 I believe there is still a market for municipal public wifi. I am 
 finding the barrier is the cost of the radios at $1k ea minimum for a 
 true mesh type dual radio system. Anything lower is cost is not true 
 Mesh. Yes, I could put something together using pieces and parts 
 however that's a support nightmare waiting to happen.
  
 If you could have a Mesh Radio designed the way you want, what would 
 it look like?
  
 My wish would look something like this:
 - Dual radio
 - Client access on 802.11b/g (optional 4.9 model for Public Safety)
 - Mesh on 802.11a (open-mesh?) with DFS on 5.2/5.4
 - Automatic scan for best channel
 - Multi-SSID (up to 16 SSID/VLAN sets)
 - BW allocation per SSID
 - QoS per VLAN
 - Encryption
 - Client Isolation
 - SNMP v1, v2
 - Ping watchdog
 - Push/Pull config
 - NAT/DHCP to clients (running as router)
 - 10/100 Ethernet
 - Outdoor, ready to hang (not a roll-your-own)
 - Browser Configurable
 - POE
 - Tech support from a manufacturer (not third party 
 support/forums/mail lists)
 - FCC certified as a system
 - Cost 350.00
  
 Let me know what you would like to see as I am working with a 
 manufacturer to develop this or something very close to it.
  
  
 airCloud Communications
 /Broadband for Business/
 /Public and Private WiFi/
 // 
 Jerry Richardson
 VP Operations
 925-260-4119
 _
  
 *ConsuWISP*
 /RF Topographical Coverage Maps/
 /Network Optimization and Planning/
 /Network Design and Troubleshooting/
 /Installer and Technician Training/
 // 
 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jerry-richardson/6/372/354
  
 P Please consider the environment before printing this email
  



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mesh Network

2009-06-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
What I quoted :)

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/*

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Charles Wyble wrote:
 Jerry Richardson wrote:
   
 I believe there is still a market for municipal public wifi. I am
 finding the barrier is the cost of the radios at $1k ea minimum for a
 true mesh type dual radio system. Anything lower is cost is not true
 Mesh. Yes, I could put something together using pieces and parts however
 that's a support nightmare waiting to happen.
  
 If you could have a Mesh Radio designed the way you want, what would it
 look like?
  
 My wish would look something like this:
 - Dual radio
 - Client access on 802.11b/g (optional 4.9 model for Public Safety)
 - Mesh on 802.11a (open-mesh?) with DFS on 5.2/5.4
 

 Yep. For me it would be 802.11n for backbone/mesh and client access on 
 802.11b/g

   
 - Automatic scan for best channel
 - Multi-SSID (up to 16 SSID/VLAN sets)
 - BW allocation per SSID
 - QoS per VLAN
 - Encryption
 - Client Isolation
 - SNMP v1, v2
 

 DD-WRT or OpenWRT can give you this.

   
 - Ping watchdog
 

 Not sure what this is? A script that runs on the router and reboots if 
 it can't ping?

   
 - Push/Pull config
 

 The PTP guys did something for this with openwrt 
 http://www.stephouse.net/files/openwrtprovisioner/openwrtprovisioner.v0.1.tgz 



   
 - NAT/DHCP to clients (running as router)
 - 10/100 Ethernet
 - Outdoor, ready to hang (not a roll-your-own)
 - Browser Configurable
 - POE
 - Tech support from a manufacturer (not third party support/forums/mail
 lists)
 


 So it would seem UBNT gear with an OpenWRT load would do most of what 
 you want?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Indoor fdx link antennas

2009-06-10 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
We have some dual-pol integrated units. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Acutally the Dual Pol brand is Poynting, and back enclosure is included.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: lakel...@gbcx.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 11:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Indoor fdx link antennas


   
 You won't find dual pol smaller than 2'

 If you do I would like to see it

 -B-
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

 -Original Message-
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com

 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:42:21
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Indoor fdx link antennas


 I would like to use MikroTik to create a fdx link that's going across a
 stadium (that's a bit more then 100 yards).  I'm thinking about looking 
 for
 some small dual pol antennas best case or the ARC ones worst case (as
 they're monstrous).

 I'll probably end up using the Compex wlm54ag at 5ghz cards and a 433ah.

 There will be voice and video traffic across this link, which is why I'd
 prefer to do fdx.

 Can anyone suggest a better alternative?  Anyone know of some good 
 antennas
 for this?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Indoor fdx link antennas

2009-06-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Yep..

Dual r52N cards in a Dual-Pol Arc Enclosure.  We can build, test and 
even put a base configuration on it for you if you wish.  Just plug them 
in and aim them at each other :) 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Josh Luthman wrote:
 I would like to use MikroTik to create a fdx link that's going across a
 stadium (that's a bit more then 100 yards).  I'm thinking about looking for
 some small dual pol antennas best case or the ARC ones worst case (as
 they're monstrous).

 I'll probably end up using the Compex wlm54ag at 5ghz cards and a 433ah.

 There will be voice and video traffic across this link, which is why I'd
 prefer to do fdx.

 Can anyone suggest a better alternative?  Anyone know of some good antennas
 for this?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
 improbable, must be the truth.
 --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How many switches can do RSTP?

2009-01-23 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Routed is the way to go. Think of this, the internet is routed, why 
should you not be..

I support hundreds of networks running RouterOS most with dynamic 
routing, with very little issues. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
 just coming back to the original topic:

 is everybody using routed backbone or somebody is playing with the
 switched/mpls thing? :)

 Thank you
   
 Dear All

 I am wondering how many switches can be put together in a bridged
 environment (via radio-bridges) with the Rapid STP. Just curious because
 I did not find anywhere the maximum number and wondering if the backbone
 collapse after 10 or 100 or 1000 switches.
 Also wondering what do you advice, I know that not all the switches are
 the same... (thinking about HP for this application)

 Thank you in advance.


 


   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

2009-01-19 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
You can use Radius and MAC authencation to deliver up and down bw at the 
AP/CPE ...  Need to have a MT client though.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



David E. Smith wrote:
 A lot of the more expensive radios out there let you do bandwidth 
 throttling by device - instead of throttling by IP address, or device 
 MAC (because you could have several MACs behind one radio), you simply 
 say this radio gets X down/Y up and you're done.

 Is there a simple way to do this with Mikrotik RouterOS? I know you can 
 shape by IP address, and I suppose I could get fancy with packet marks 
 or something, but I'm trying to keep the configuration as simple as 
 possible. (If it's something that also can be set via RADIUS, that'd be 
 even better, as I hope someday to be able to automate more things like 
 this.)

 David Smith
 MVN.net


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

2009-01-19 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
With MT clients, yes this is possible.  If you have a simple subnet you 
can do PCQ as well in in your queues if you wish too. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Cameron Kilton wrote:
 Is there a way to limit the bandwidth by the user registration table. 

 Example: All users in registration table get x download and x upload
 unless other changed manually.

 Is this possible? I've been wanting something like this as well. 

 -Cameron

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:35 PM
 To: dmburg...@linktechs.net; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

 Or radius and a pppoe client.

 On 1/19/09, Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net
 wrote:
   
 You can use Radius and MAC authencation to deliver up and down bw at
 
 the
   
 AP/CPE ...  Need to have a MT client though.

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 David E. Smith wrote:
 
 A lot of the more expensive radios out there let you do bandwidth
 throttling by device - instead of throttling by IP address, or device
 MAC (because you could have several MACs behind one radio), you
   
 simply
   
 say this radio gets X down/Y up and you're done.

 Is there a simple way to do this with Mikrotik RouterOS? I know you
   
 can
   
 shape by IP address, and I suppose I could get fancy with packet
   
 marks
   
 or something, but I'm trying to keep the configuration as simple as
 possible. (If it's something that also can be set via RADIUS, that'd
   
 be
   
 even better, as I hope someday to be able to automate more things
   
 like
   
 this.)

 David Smith
 MVN.net



   
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   

 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

2009-01-19 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
then down yes, up no.  The Nanos, you can use pCQ to do a default rate 
limit.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Cameron Kilton wrote:
 We are using MT AP's with Nanostation SU.

 -Cam

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Gerard Dupont III
 Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:52 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

 If you are using Mikrotik for both AP's and CPE's, you can use the 
 Default AP/Client Tx Rate settings under the wireless tab on your 
 wireless interface properties.

 If you're not using Mikrotik clients it will only be able to control the

 AP Tx(client download) speeds.

 If you add the customers to the access list you can override these 
 default settings.

 -Gerard

 Cameron Kilton wrote:
   
 Is there a way to limit the bandwidth by the user registration table. 

 Example: All users in registration table get x download and x upload
 unless other changed manually.

 Is this possible? I've been wanting something like this as well. 

 -Cameron

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 
 On
   
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:35 PM
 To: dmburg...@linktechs.net; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?

 Or radius and a pppoe client.

 On 1/19/09, Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net
 wrote:
 
 You can use Radius and MAC authencation to deliver up and down bw at
   
 the
 
 AP/CPE ...  Need to have a MT client though.

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 David E. Smith wrote:
   
 A lot of the more expensive radios out there let you do bandwidth
 throttling by device - instead of throttling by IP address, or
 
 device
   
 MAC (because you could have several MACs behind one radio), you
 
 simply
 
 say this radio gets X down/Y up and you're done.

 Is there a simple way to do this with Mikrotik RouterOS? I know you
 
 can
 
 shape by IP address, and I suppose I could get fancy with packet
 
 marks
 
 or something, but I'm trying to keep the configuration as simple as
 possible. (If it's something that also can be set via RADIUS, that'd
 
 be
 
 even better, as I hope someday to be able to automate more things
 
 like
 
 this.)

 David Smith
 MVN.net



 
 
   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
   
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
   
 
   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
   
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today

Re: [WISPA] Imail Server Upgrade Trouble

2009-01-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Speaking of mail servers, anyone have any luck getting imap push 
technology to work?

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA.ORG Vender Member*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
 There is a tool in the imail folder I be damned if I recall the name of it 
 but it is to convert from old mailbox format to new format. It might do the 
 trick. Unfortunately I'm driving so can check for you. I found out about it 
 when I converted from Imail to SmarterMail. Which btw might be a product you 
 might want to check out. To purchase it is almost cheaper then your yearly 
 Imail maintenance agreement plus much better feature and have a webmail 
 system that allow users to control to some degree their own spam settings and 
 have good enterprise capabilities including blackberry calendar and contacts 
 sync and easy shared contacts and calendar. Imail webmail does NOT handle 
 mailboxes with some special characters that you might have created through 
 imap. When you log in it just sits there until it finally times out. We been 
 plagued by this for a long time and they never fixed it. 
 Also SmarterMail comes at no additional charge with good/better spam 
 filtering and virus screening and you can use a Linux box with spamassassin 
 to assist with spam filtering. 

 If you can not find the tool then check on smartermail how to  convert from 
 Imail to SmarterMail it's in the instructions. 

 /Eje
 --Original Message--
 From: John Scrivner
 Sender: 
 To: WISPA General List
 ReplyTo: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Imail Server Upgrade Trouble
 Sent: Jan 18, 2009 11:52

 We upgraded our Imail server this morning from version 8.15 to the latest
 release of Imail version 10. In the process our web interface has decided to
 ignore our mailboxes. If anyone out there has some experience with
 troubleshooting mailbox rebuilding issues in Imail then please call me at
 618-237-2387 as soon as you read this. Your help is appreciated.
 Thank you,
 John Scrivner


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Filtering SMTP

2009-01-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
If you wish all of your mail to come from that.

We typically just restrict outbound SMTP to either pop/imap first, or an 
open list.

But of course, they need to have their own IP to not poison yours.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA.ORG Vender Member*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Gino Villarini wrote:
 ok, We use a Barracuda in Outbound mode as an SMTP server, 
  
 would it be logical to NAT all our internal traffic with destination 25
 to the Barracuda?
  
 Would this break any Business Customer with static ips and valid smtp
 servers?
  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 g...@aeronetpr.com 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ligowave 3.65 Experience?

2009-01-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
We have done some MT 3.75 links :)   Sorry no ligowave.

Simply put its better than 5 gig if there is lots of interference, but 
no better than 2.4 when it comes to LoS.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
WISPA.ORG Vender Member*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Gino Villarini wrote:
 Anyone has deployed this units?
  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 g...@aeronetpr.com 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 1and1.com

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
I don't outsource this, but I do host it on the Virtual servers we 
sell.  The key is we can log into the server and do whatever, including 
getting messages like this etc.  e-mail is cheap, its simple to support 
and just runs for the most part.  Its that stupid hardware problem that 
kills ya! 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mike Hammett wrote:
 That would most likely only retrieve items in the Inbox.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Jay Clark li...@s135365950.onlinehome.us
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:38 AM
 To: dmburg...@linktechs.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 1and1.com

   
 Is it possible to log into the same account using POP settings and
 retrieve the mail that way?
 Jay

 On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote:

 
 I have a number of customers that switched from them because of this
 reason.  Just no one there.

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
   
 Anyone have a good contact at 1and1.com of someone who can actually
 help
 me.

 I moved 125 very important messages in my imap account from one
 folder
 to another and their mail server ate them.  They tell me they can't
 help
 because I use thunderbird.there has to be a backup to that
 imap
 account somewhere.  I just need to get a hold of someone who will
 help me.

 Thanks,
 Brian


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
second this!!   :)  So far seeing good results as well with the new R5Hs 
and N-Stream too ;) 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Blair Davis wrote:
 A pair of Mikrotiks, radio cards and all, under $1K and you should be 
 able to do 20Mbit.

 Pat O'Connor wrote:
 Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA

 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge.  Old Proxim 
 gear, 2 x T1.  I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they 
 are using.  I need to keep it under $5K if possible.

 Link distance: 8.3 miles

 Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Like I said, if you just need data, then MT can't be beat on this.  lets 
see, 30-40 meg throughput in most cases, if he gets good signals, super 
low latency, usually 1-2ms if that, warrantied product, and FCC 
certification ;)

Heck, just the boxes with POEs, ethernet surge and new 6gig Coax 
Arresters would be under  $650 including both sides! 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



3-dB Networks wrote:
 Well I have always been really happy with the Motorola PtP series radios
 (maybe a PtP 300 for this link).

 It all depends on what you need... T-1 transport, how much data throughput,
 channel size, latency, noise immunity, warranties, fcc compliance, etc.

 That part number is for a single pol dish though... so to use a PtP 300 you
 would want to swap out the feedhorn for the dual pol feedhorn...

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 http://www.3dbnetworks.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Pat O'Connor
 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:40 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations



 Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA

 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge.  Old Proxim 
 gear, 2 x T1.  I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they 
 are using.  I need to keep it under $5K if possible.

 Link distance: 8.3 miles

 Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Yes you have to have a good processor, it does compression.  I also 
believe it does MPPP as well, and larger frame sizes as well to get 
higher speeds.  Hence, processor usage is key.

MT is a router, why bridge! :)  never really needed to do WDS with 
N-stream etc.  Its also a polling system and you can disable CSMA as well.


--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Yes, Nstreme can add significant speed, depending on the situation, It 
 should be noted that...

 1. Nstreme performs slower if the Radios do not have fast enough processors. 
 For example, we found the old RB532s 233Mhz, NOT fast enough proc.
 2. Nstreme works great (fast) on the newer faster boards, such as 433AH and 
 600Series.
 3. Nstreme is not compatible to be used for all configurations. I forget the 
 exact details, but when we were trying to use WDS and VLANs, to immulate a 
 transparent bridge (VLAN switch) in a PTMP design (to connect a group of 4 
 tenant buildings, 1 acting as AP, and 3 acting as Stations), Nstreme had to 
 be disabled, for it to work. That was pre-2.29 version. I do not know, how 
 it is now with  v3.x
 4. Nstreme2 is its way to use two channels togeather. Which works optimal 
 provided have adequate channel seperation ( 80mhz). Its good alternative to 
 do it in multi-band, when a single 40mhz wide channel is not available.
 5. It requires access to both sides of the link to configure for NStreme.

 But I bet Dennis, would have all the answers of how to optimize usage of 
 Nstreme.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations


   
 Like I said, if you just need data, then MT can't be beat on this.  lets
 see, 30-40 meg throughput in most cases, if he gets good signals, super
 low latency, usually 1-2ms if that, warrantied product, and FCC
 certification ;)

 Heck, just the boxes with POEs, ethernet surge and new 6gig Coax
 Arresters would be under  $650 including both sides!

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 3-dB Networks wrote:
 
 Well I have always been really happy with the Motorola PtP series radios
 (maybe a PtP 300 for this link).

 It all depends on what you need... T-1 transport, how much data 
 throughput,
 channel size, latency, noise immunity, warranties, fcc compliance, etc.

 That part number is for a single pol dish though... so to use a PtP 300 
 you
 would want to swap out the feedhorn for the dual pol feedhorn...

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks
 http://www.3dbnetworks.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Pat O'Connor
 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:40 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations



 Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA

 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge.  Old Proxim
 gear, 2 x T1.  I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they
 are using.  I need to keep it under $5K if possible.

 Link distance: 8.3 miles

 Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
With that inside like that, you can get reflections etc.  It does the 
compression and M3P I'm sure as well.  It should not incraase the 
latency that much and should not fluctuate like that normally.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



David E. Smith wrote:
 Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote:
   
 Yes you have to have a good processor, it does compression.  I also 
 believe it does MPPP as well, and larger frame sizes as well to get 
 higher speeds.  Hence, processor usage is key.
 

 When I was testing this - pretty informally, two radios set on the floor 
 of the office about a hundred feet apart - the speeds weren't that much 
 higher, and the latency was all weird. The RF link was pretty good (I 
 think there was 40-some-odd points of SNR), and when I used them in 
 regular AP/bridge mode, or basic WDS, I actually got better performance 
 than when I enabled polling and Nstreme and all the other Mikrotik 
 proprietary magic checkboxes.

 The throughput was pretty comparable, but when the link was even lightly 
 loaded, pings went bananas. Instead of being consistent, some would be 
 3ms, some would be 100ms. I figured that was because my little ping 
 packets were being bundled up with other packets, then transmitted when 
 it was most efficient for the radio, as opposed to being sent on-demand.

 First, is that pretty close to accurate? Second, in the real world, when 
 you're trying to do something like VOIP or gaming that's sensitive to 
 latency, how noticeable is it?

 David Smith
 MVN.net


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

2009-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
yep, anything more than -40 is BAD.  better tests are around -55 or so..

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Jack Unger wrote:
 David,

 Just for info here but it's possible that your signals were so loud 
 that the receivers were being overloaded. That drives them bananas...

 jack


 David E. Smith wrote:
 Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote:
   
 Yes you have to have a good processor, it does compression.  I also 
 believe it does MPPP as well, and larger frame sizes as well to get 
 higher speeds.  Hence, processor usage is key.
 

 When I was testing this - pretty informally, two radios set on the floor 
 of the office about a hundred feet apart - the speeds weren't that much 
 higher, and the latency was all weird. The RF link was pretty good (I 
 think there was 40-some-odd points of SNR), and when I used them in 
 regular AP/bridge mode, or basic WDS, I actually got better performance 
 than when I enabled polling and Nstreme and all the other Mikrotik 
 proprietary magic checkboxes.

 The throughput was pretty comparable, but when the link was even lightly 
 loaded, pings went bananas. Instead of being consistent, some would be 
 3ms, some would be 100ms. I figured that was because my little ping 
 packets were being bundled up with other packets, then transmitted when 
 it was most efficient for the radio, as opposed to being sent on-demand.

 First, is that pretty close to accurate? Second, in the real world, when 
 you're trying to do something like VOIP or gaming that's sensitive to 
 latency, how noticeable is it?

 David Smith
 MVN.net


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



   

 -- 
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
 Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
 WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
 For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
 FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
 Phone 818-227-4220  Email jun...@ask-wi.com


   
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FM radio station site strangeness

2009-01-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
We had a site with a 1000 watt AM Hotstick about 100 feet from another 
tower.  We ran the cable (non-shielded outdoor rated) and crimped the 
end at the top of the tower.  The installer all of a sudden, felt a 
burning sensation on his thumb with that wonderful smell of burning 
skin.  Guess what, he was holding the end of the cat5, not plugged into 
anything, just ran up the tower!  Sure enough, nice little burn marks 
right where the copper pins on the cat5 was! 

Put in a few ferrite beads, never looked back.  fun stuff to say the 
least.  ON a side note, we are at 400 foot on a 1400 foot FM tower 
transmitting at 100,000 watts at the top.  We ran Power up, but have a 
440 foot non-poe cat5 down, and don't have any issues! lol

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Hi All,

 I think we finally have this all figured out.  Now I just have to figure out 
 how to fix it.

 We've been up there for over 6 years now.  It's certainly been a problematic 
 site though.  Constant channel changes (we have 3 competitors a mile away 
 and pick up hundreds of ap's from in town) are the norm.

 This fall (a month or two ago) one of the tenants left the building.  This 
 cleared out most of the hardware that was in there.  A little bit before 
 that I replaced an Inscape Data and a smartBridges combo with a single MT 
 access point, using one of the cables that had been working for one of the 
 other two.

 About a week ago things started to really act up.  Multiple devices were 
 having trouble.  I was able to catch it in the act finally.  This time the 
 problem wasn't a wireless issue, the devices were constantly disconnecting 
 and reconnecting at the switch level.

 I pulled the Cisco switch out and dropped in a Netgear unit.  That didn't 
 fix it.  Next I put in a Digital Loggers rack mount reboot device.  That 
 wouldn't connect right either.

 I finally had to pull all of the hardware off of the shelf and set most of 
 it on the floor (or just let it hang there) to get it working at all well. 
 Still not perfect but better.

 I had by now hiked up there through sometimes knee deep snow 3 or 4 times. 
 Next I took a motorbike with studded snow tires up and got permission to 
 turn down the power to the radio station.  That didn't fix the problem 
 either.

 Next I borrowed a snowmobile and hauled some help and my spectrum analyzer 
 up.  I was unable to see any signals that didn't belong.

 Next day, another hike up the hill.

 OK, maybe a cat 5 cable went bad and I'm getting backfeed through the 
 switch.  DC current or something.  So I started testing the cables that run 
 to the most problematic units.  Well now, look at that.  Bad cable.  In fact 
 there are three of them.  Hmmm, kinda strange though.  All three have the 
 exact same fault!  Oh well, better change them out anyway.  I ran three new 
 cable runs and just for kicks I tested one of them.  What the heck?  The 
 new cable has the EXACT same fault as the old one!  Even though it didn't 
 follow the exact same path as the old cables.

 Man, this is sure looking like a problem caused by the radio station.  I was 
 using indoor cat5 and didn't run lightning protection or ground anything. 
 Yeah I know, but remember that this has been there for a very long time like 
 this.  And as a guy with an electrical background I know that there are 
 actually two ways to deal with stray electrical.  Grounding is one. 
 Insulating is another  Anyway, I know it wasn't built to specs.

 I added some grounding and that didn't help at all.

 Yesterday I finally had one of the local wireless companies (Day Wireless) 
 that mainly does VHF radios, backhaul etc.  They also checked things with 
 the spectrum analyzer but couldn't find anything amiss.  I was able to 
 duplicate the wiring fault for them (with my Ideal tester).  But suddenly 
 everything cleared right up!  Stuff was looking good, no cable fault etc. 
 Pings were looking good, devices were finally negotiating the connections 
 right etc.

 I called the radio station to ask if I could try turning the power down 
 again to see if we see any change on the spectrum analyzer.  They said they 
 thought that I'd already done that because the showed the power was way 
 down.  Turns out someone in the building had bumped a breaker and shut down 
 part of the transmitter!  Well, we got all of that figured out and guess 
 what.  All of the problems came right back!  I then turned the power back 
 down and they cleared up.

 Tip for you guys, dropping an 18,000 watt system down by even 60% of it's 
 normal output isn't always 

Re: [WISPA] Tower accident

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Not to say thats not right.  The whole point of the Darwin awards was 
that the people who died have died in the most stupidest way, that they 
did the entire human population a favor by eliminating themselves from 
the gene pool.  There is a movie even on it.Like the guy who 
strapped a Jato Rocket to his Chevy, the guy who was so cheap, he got 
his hand stuck in the soda machine and while trying to free it, it feel 
over on him.  ETC.  Its on netflix instant streaming. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



George Rogato wrote:
 Very sad indeed.
 I don't think they should be giving awards away for incidents when 
 people die at work. Even if the person made a mistake like that.
 It was not funny to me at all.

 But some have a weird sense of humor.
 Me, I see no humor in a death or falling off a tower


 Blair Davis wrote:
   
 Tower accident...

 http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2008-20.html


 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Postage

2009-01-05 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Something else you can do is use a printing co.  There should be one 
local to you.  They should be able to print, stuff and qualify for 
bulk rates.

Something else we did, we had 220 people in my subdivision, it was 92 
bucks for postage, plus envelopes, plus printing, plus paper etc.  
(non-profit subdivision here).  We had a printer sent out cards with 
the yearly dues on them, for less than 15 cents a piece including 
printing, postage and cards! 


--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Travis Johnson wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm curious what everyone else is using for sending USPS letters and 
 packages? We've had a nice postage machine (seals, stamps, etc.) that 
 does our envelopes each month (about 1,500 per month). However, I'm 
 getting tired of these companies (Neopost) charging $200 for a software 
 update because the post office changes their pricing.

 What is anyone else doing? We send about 1,500 envelopes on the 20th of 
 each month, and then only a couple a day the other days.

 thanks,

 Travis
 Microserv


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ptmp gear

2009-01-03 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
just 2.4 on the crossroads.  They have 5.8 gig systems that are 
certified.  Just not 5.2/5.4 as of yet.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Dimitrios Sidiropoulos wrote:
 Josh,

   
 Are there FCC certificed cards to run at 5.2/5.4 with MT?
 

   
 Dennis - I already beat you to the punch.  Don't steal my glory :)

 The crossroads is FCC certified.
   

 Is there a 5.2/5.4 crossroads ?

 I am only aware of the 2.4 one !

 Thank you
 Dimitri

   
 On 12/31/08, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
   
 Are there FCC certificed cards to run at 5.2/5.4 with MT?




 __
 Jerry Richardson
 airCloud Communications

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 
 On
   
 Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
 Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:39 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] ptmp gear

 Mikrotik! :)

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board
 Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc --
 Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Alan Long wrote:
 
 I am looking for a ptmp(ap/cpe) solution, 5.2/5.4/5.8 ghz, need to be
   
 able
 
 to support about 25 feeds into several ap's. Need it to be cheap, but
 work..Will have complete los and the longest link will be .25 miles.
   
 Trying
 
 to link 25 buildings in a multi housing setup. Thanks for any help.







  http://www.aerowire.net







 Alan Long
 Director of Network Operations

 Aerowire


   
 http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=687+North+Dean+Roadcsz=
 Aubu
 
 rn%2C+AL+36830country=us 687 North Dean Road
 Auburn, AL 36830


  mailto:alan.l...@aerowire.net alan.l...@aerowire.net


 tel:
 mobile:



   
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=33427599
 98E
 
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 3342759998


   
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=3360
 92E
 
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 336092







   
 https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=30065206883src=client_sig_212_1_card_jo
 ini
 
 nvite=1=en Always have my latest info

  http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig=en
   
 Want a
 
 signature like this?






   
 
 


   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 --
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer




   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless

Re: [WISPA] ptmp gear

2009-01-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Might be simpler to say, a Routerboard 411, with an integrated radio 
card that does 2.4 only.  Fully FCC certified. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



John Scrivner wrote:
 What is the crossroads radio platform? I have never heard of it. Any link
 to information about it is appreciated.
 Thank you,
 John Scrivner


 On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

   
 Dennis - I already beat you to the punch.  Don't steal my glory :)

 The crossroads is FCC certified.

 On 12/31/08, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 
 Are there FCC certificed cards to run at 5.2/5.4 with MT?




 __
 Jerry Richardson
 airCloud Communications

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
 Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:39 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] ptmp gear

 Mikrotik! :)

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board
 Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc --
 Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Alan Long wrote:
   
 I am looking for a ptmp(ap/cpe) solution, 5.2/5.4/5.8 ghz, need to be
 
 able
   
 to support about 25 feeds into several ap's. Need it to be cheap, but
 work..Will have complete los and the longest link will be .25 miles.
 
 Trying
   
 to link 25 buildings in a multi housing setup. Thanks for any help.







  http://www.aerowire.net







 Alan Long
 Director of Network Operations

 Aerowire


 
 http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=687+North+Dean+Roadcsz=
 Aubu
   
 rn%2C+AL+36830country=us 687 North Dean Road
 Auburn, AL 36830


  mailto:alan.l...@aerowire.net alan.l...@aerowire.net


 tel:
 mobile:



 
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=33427599
 98E
   
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 3342759998


 
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=3360
 92E
   
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 336092







 
 https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=30065206883src=client_sig_212_1_card_jo
 ini
   
 nvite=1=en Always have my latest info

  http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig=en
 
 Want a
   
 signature like this?






 
 
   


 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 --
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http

Re: [WISPA] ptmp gear

2008-12-31 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Mikrotik! :) 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Alan Long wrote:
 I am looking for a ptmp(ap/cpe) solution, 5.2/5.4/5.8 ghz, need to be able
 to support about 25 feeds into several ap's. Need it to be cheap, but
 work..Will have complete los and the longest link will be .25 miles. Trying
 to link 25 buildings in a multi housing setup. Thanks for any help.

  





  http://www.aerowire.net 

  

  



 Alan Long
 Director of Network Operations 

 Aerowire
  
 http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=687+North+Dean+Roadcsz=Aubu
 rn%2C+AL+36830country=us 687 North Dean Road
 Auburn, AL 36830 


  mailto:alan.l...@aerowire.net alan.l...@aerowire.net 


 tel: 
 mobile: 

  
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=3342759998E
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 3342759998
  
 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=336092E
 mail=along5...@yahoo.com 336092 

  



  
 https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=30065206883src=client_sig_212_1_card_joini
 nvite=1=en Always have my latest info

  http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig=en Want a
 signature like this?

  


   
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] cisco switch help

2008-12-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Did you setup the port you are on, to the right VLAN, or configure your 
NIC on your laptop for that VLAN? 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Hi All,

 I need some help getting an ip address onto a Catalyst 2950 switch.  I have 
 the ip assigned to a vlan port but can't get to it via my laptop

 Give me a call at 509.982.2181 or shoot me a number that I can call please.

 Thanks,
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] cisco switch help

2008-12-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
No biggy.  Shoot us a call anytime!

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Thanks Dennis!  You are my hero!
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 8:43 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] cisco switch help


   
 Did you setup the port you are on, to the right VLAN, or configure your
 NIC on your laptop for that VLAN?

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 
 Hi All,

 I need some help getting an ip address onto a Catalyst 2950 switch.  I 
 have
 the ip assigned to a vlan port but can't get to it via my laptop

 Give me a call at 509.982.2181 or shoot me a number that I can call 
 please.

 Thanks,
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] What happened to my RooTenna?

2008-12-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
looks like it fell off! 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Sure the venue hasn't changed to a RC Airplane race track :-)  Looks like it 
 got hit by a minature 747. :-)

 Only answer I could fathom is Vandalism.  Most likely, the first outage may 
 not have occurred at the time of first dmaage. Very possible, it was a night 
 vandal, and it just took a while for the wind to finish the job, to the 
 exposed radio.

 Alternatively, a low flying Crow having a head on colission. Any feathers at 
 the seen, as evidence :-)

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 3:50 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] What happened to my RooTenna?


   
 http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=56132l=8ad46id=517748044

 I'll post a couple more pictures once I get them from the customer, but I 
 went over to look at their CPE today because their service was down.  It 
 looks like someone ran it over with a Mack truck, only it is on a roof of 
 a large building (used to be indoor RC race track).  How the heck could 
 this have happened?


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG.
 Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1867 - Release Date: 
 12/28/2008 2:23 PM


 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] What happened to my RooTenna?

2008-12-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
too bad its not grounding the unit. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mac Dearman wrote:
 Mike,


Looks like that thing gave birth to an alien!! - hehehe (been watching
 SciFi)

 Where do you get those little plastic standoffs that hold your MB off the
 aluminum backing plate? That looks nice!

 Later,
 Mac




   
 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 2:50 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] What happened to my RooTenna?

 http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=56132l=8ad46id=517748044

 I'll post a couple more pictures once I get them from the customer, but
 I went over to look at their CPE today because their service was down.
 It looks like someone ran it over with a Mack truck, only it is on a
 roof of a large building (used to be indoor RC race track).  How the
 heck could this have happened?


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1868 - Release Date:
 12/29/2008 10:48 AM
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] This thing still working?

2008-12-28 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net

-- 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo Disconnects was: tranzeo's web site?

2008-12-26 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Might be a difference of reading the RFCs.  I.e. the RFCs are not clear 
enough as two people may be able to form their own interpretation too.  

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Tom DeReggi wrote:
 I'm not sure that it was confirmed a Tranzeo issue.
 Tranzeo was however very helpful to define the cause.
 And Mikrotik did fix the problem.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 11:29 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Tranzeo Disconnects was: tranzeo's web site?


   
 Mikrotik sent out a very public announcement that they had fully 
 researched
 the issues with Tranzeo client radios staying connected to Mikrotik APs. 
 As
 a courtesy to their customers who use Tranzeo clients Mikrotik wrote a 
 code
 modification into their AP code which could be used to enable more 
 reliable
 connections with Trnazeo radios. Mikrotik stated that the trouble was that
 Tranzeo radios were not following the RFCs. Tranzeo would apparently not
 address the issue. The fact that Mikrotik did create a solution to an
 apparent Tranzeo problem should not lead anyone to assume that this was a
 Mikrotik problem at all. I never saw any piblic response from Tranzeo
 relating to this issue.
 Scriv


 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

 
 Thanks for clarifying that.  I have read time and time again the devices
 would reboot (power cycle, not just reassociate!)

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
   
 wrote:
 
 But they didn't reboot.  It was simply a disconnect reconnect.

 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] tranzeo's web site?


 
 Tranzeo followed the RFC by rebooting with whatever frame it was 
 sent,
 as I recall.

 On 12/24/08, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 o...@odessaoffice.com
 wrote:
   
 As it was explained to me, the problem was the exact opposite of 
 what
 you've
 stated.  Tranzeo did something that's NON standards based and MT
 
 finally
   
 created a work around.

 Who knows...
 Marlon
 (509) 982-2181
 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
 42846865 (icq)WISP Operator 
 since
 1999!
 o...@odessaoffice.com
 www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
 www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



 - Original Message -
 From: John Valenti vale...@lir.msu.edu
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:20 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] tranzeo's web site?


 
 Marlon,

 I thought the Tranzeo/MT problem was a Mikrotik issue, fixed by 
 their
 update.  (Tranzeo did a work-around, but it wasn't their bug)   Or 
 is
 there some other problem?

 Oh, www.tranzeo.com is working for me, now.

 And Merry Christmas to you, too!


 On Dec 21, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:

   
 Glad it's not just me!  grin

 Nothing particular right now.  I was just checking for any new
 versions.

 Well, I guess I would sure like a fix for the Tranzeo/MT problem.
 Not the
 MT patch, but a proper fix from Tranzeo.

 And for Christmas I want a firmware for the Tranzeo AP's that
 doesn't lock
 up!

 Merry Christmas all!
 marlon
 


   
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   


 
 
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Potential Dr.'s office asking about our network and HIPAA?

2008-12-23 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Create a tunnel back to your NOC.  done! 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



John McDowell wrote:
 We are routed, but from any computer on the network, we can go to any IP on
 the network. So its like our broadcast is routed, but we're still bridged?

 Anyhow, I have a potential Dr.'s office that is asking about the security of
 his information across our network until it leaves the NOC. How do you guys
 do network security? Vlans? PPPoE?  What can we do to ensure that we can
 comply with HIPAA standards for potential clients like this?

 Thanks in advance.

   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] wholesale bandwidth

2008-12-17 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I.e. you want bandwidth out of st. louis? 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mark McElvy wrote:
 I am looking for wholesale bandwidth providers to either St Louis or
 Rolla Missouri.

  

 Mark



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] processor and computers, what's good these days? was -- Re: Article

2008-12-08 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I built some machines, AMD 5000+ Black Editions, 4 gig RAM, Vista, 500 
gig SATAs, DVD drives, nice cases, HD 3500 512meg PCI-E Video Carts and 
DUAL DVI 22inch LCDs.  So far, I don't wait for them!  Was inexpensive 
for the box too.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Got it.  So what are the medium to good ones to watch for?

 I used to really like AMD but I'm hearing that they suck.  At least that's 
 what one thought over on the isp-ceo list.

 We used to tell people to get Gateway systems.  Then we went Micron, then 
 Micro Flex, now Dell.  Once in a while I'd build one for myself, but who 
 wants to deal with warranty work when PC's aren't your core business?

 Service is usually the main thing that I look at when suggesting a PC to 
 someone.  *I* don't want to be the one that has to help them with all of the 
 questions that come up.

 What are you guys suggesting and using these days?

 thanks,
 marlon

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 10:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article


   
 Different architectures, multiple processor cores per processor.  One
 processor of today can literally do the work of 4 as they have 4 little
 processors inside one physical processor.

 Kind of like how channel size isn't a very good measurement of how much 
 data
 you can push through it.  There are many other factors at play.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-12-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Is there a central resource for this type of information?

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mike Hammett wrote:
 Comcast, Global Crossing, Level(3), Electric Lightwave, and 360 Networks 
 have POPs in your town.

 I might look more later, but I figure that's a good place to start.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 10:10 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

   
 I'm having a heck of a time finding providers in my area (Eugene, OR) from
 which I can backhaul to my network.  Anyone know of a good site or have
 contacts for people who could quote in my area?  We're looking for 30-40
 megs at this point, but if we COULD get these 100meg ports at a reasonable
 rate, we'd go for it.

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message - 
 From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information


 
 There deals clear down to $7/meg.
 Ask vendors for a 2 year contract, GigE 100 Mbps burstable.

 - Original Message - 
 From: John Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 10:07 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information


   
 http://www.nefiber.com/

 Recently, I learned that American Fiber Systems has InterCity Fiber
 Ring that connects Las Vegas, Reno/Carson City, Boise and Salt Lake on
 a fully redundant OC-192 capacity backbone.
 They aren't cheap on the low end at $2000/month for 5 meg burstable to
 10, but I image the price per meg drops quickly as the bandwidth goes
 
 up.
 
 These guys do fiber in California

 http://www.fiberinternetcenter.com/

 They do 5 meg burstable to 10 at $1595-1995 but they told me they can 
 do
 100 meg for about $7000 per month.

 John

 Mike Hammett wrote:
 
 Right.  I'm amazed at how many ISPs out there don't know who these
 providers
 are, or the carriers outside of the RBOCs, or what connectivity
 possibilities are in their areas.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Jason Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:15 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information


   
 Right, it is not. It is a embedded content provider for web sites.

 J Hodge
 630.445.3779


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 On
 
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 11:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

 I'm not saying it's not possible, but I doubt that there is much much
 BitTorrent traffic coming from Limelight.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Jason Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 11:41 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information


 
 Sounds like bit torrent. What ports is the traffic on?

 J Hodge
 630.445.3779

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 On
 
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 11:43 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

 Hi,

 So I grabbed all of Limelight Networks' IP blocks and created a 
 queue
 on
 my MT core router. I am currently seeing about 8-9Mbps upload with
   
 only
 
 a 500kbps download. Any idea why I would be seeing so much upload
 traffic (coming from 10-15 different customers)?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Mike Hammett wrote:

   
 208.111.168.6


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com




 From: Travis Johnson
 Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:40 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information


 Do you happen to have the IP blocks it was coming from?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Mike Hammett wrote:
 Since no one answered, I got NetFlix myself and added 

Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-11-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Yes. I am up to 25 gig this month.  Course me and my wife have been 
watching older TV shows over the weekend.  ;) 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Travis Johnson wrote:
 You have hit the problem directly on the head. You think a simple 
 Canopy AP is going to solve the problem? Let's say you are allocating 
 10Mbps downlink on this AP... that would mean 5 customers per AP (@ 
 2Mbps each). Nobody in this market can survive on those ratios.

 This service needs capped and people that want it can pay for video 
 streaming which is $100/month extra... that would be my vote.

 Travis
 Microserv

 Drew Lentz wrote:
 In areas like yours, though, some would argue that is the perfect place for
 some type of licensed LTE/WiMAX type of service. Even with a Canopy type
 service it would beat down the doors of the telco offering only 3Mbps of
 service. As more and more devices have bandwidth requirements, the service
 providers will fall into line, I believe.

 Everyone has always pushed for more bandwidth, but it as always come from
 the customers as opposed to the devices. It seems like now, the device
 requirements will leave the customer with no choice and force them into a
 decision of higher consumption.

 As far as furthering the digital divide, I don't think it will hurt it all
 that bad. On the contrary what would be nice to see is the communications
 mediums becoming less expensive because of the amount of services required.
 Just like the price of bandwidth has changed over the years, I think it will
 continue to drop. I would love to see some research data on the cost per MB
 over the last 10 years and see what the trend is like.

 That combined with less expensive and functional equipment (UBNT's Bullet,
 the introduction of Mikrotik years ago, for examples) gives operators the
 ability to put more bandwidth than before in users hands at a fraction of
 the cost. 

 I think more than anything it will come down to a backhaul battle. Fiber to
 the node, fiber to the AP, high capacity microwave links (Bridgewave,
 Dragonwave, Ceragon, etc) These are all going to be critically important to
 aggregate and transport these huge amounts of data.

   


 On 11/24/08 1:06 AM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 It will further the digital divide. Rural remote locations will be again 
 left
 in the boon docks. Where I live, 3 meg DSL is the fastest available 
 connection
 at $75/mth. Cheapest T1 here is over $600/mth, and fiber? forget it, can't 
 get
 it unless you want to build about 4 towers just to backhaul, or pay 
 $1200/mth
 for each cell tower to put them on.

 Why should the small ISP's foot the bill for Netflix and these companies 
 that
 are making million's of dollars more than we are?

 Scottie

 -- Original Message --
 From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:41:41 -0600

 
 I'm all for open systems. Limiting the amount of bandwidth at any level is,
 to me, a terrible thing to do. I understand that it doesn't necessarily fit
 the model as it applies to today's business for many ISPs, but, maybe its
 time to change the model.

 This is where the separation of providers starts to take shape. The 
 networks
 that can handle these loads and supply the end-user are going to win the
 customers. I honestly think the demand of large scale bandwidth is going to
 be fed to the end-user by the consumer electronics market. Look at CES last
 year. Look how many devices demand connectivity at certain levels. If your
 current service provider can't get you what you need, there will always be
 someone else who can.

 There is some great info here from a recent conference:
 http://www4.gsb.columbia.edu/citi/events/summit2008

 Take a look at the slides. I like the reference to the slide where it 
 breaks
 down how much bandwidth utilization there is expected to be per household:
 35+ Mbps (and those are numbers from 2006!)
 4 VoIP lines @ 100Kbps
 2 SDTVs @ 2Mbps
 2 HDTVs @ 9 Mbps
 1 Gaming device @ 1Mbps
 1 High Spedd Internet @ 10Mbps

 Scary how quickly it adds up :)

 My favorite quote:
 ³By the year 2010 bandwidth for 20 homes will generate more traffic than
 entire Internet in 1995²

 -d


 On 11/24/08 12:24 AM, Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:

 
 It will be interesting to see how this plays out... the amount of
 bandwidth required to sustain this type of service is not cost
 effective. My upstream costs alone are over $50/Mbps. So if someone
 wants to run a 

Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-11-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
It is important to understand the business impact on this.  If you can 
deliver these speeds, this also could be a method to enable upgrades 
of your service.  I.e. Customer calls in and says their netflix video is 
bad, if they do not have at least 2-3 meg , and you offer that speed, 
upgrade them!   I know WISPs on 2.4 delivering 3 meg to customers (some 
not all).  Course they don't get far on each AP. lol

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Josh Luthman wrote:
 Couple of things to mention here...

 I believe (not certain!) that Netflix will do lower quality streams based on
 your downstream connection.  How low it will go I can't say.

 If a customer wants something they have to pay for it.  The majority of
 customers go with the smallest package (something like 256k to 2meg
 depending on the area) which probably won't work with Netflix well.  They'll
 be forced to upgrade and pay more to the ISP, or stop the Netflix service
 (which is free for the first month).

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 Yes. I am up to 25 gig this month.  Course me and my wife have been
 watching older TV shows over the weekend.  ;)

 --
 * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
 *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/

 */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
 http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



 Travis Johnson wrote:
 
 You have hit the problem directly on the head. You think a simple
 Canopy AP is going to solve the problem? Let's say you are allocating
 10Mbps downlink on this AP... that would mean 5 customers per AP (@
 2Mbps each). Nobody in this market can survive on those ratios.

 This service needs capped and people that want it can pay for video
 streaming which is $100/month extra... that would be my vote.

 Travis
 Microserv

 Drew Lentz wrote:
   
 In areas like yours, though, some would argue that is the perfect place
 
 for
 
 some type of licensed LTE/WiMAX type of service. Even with a Canopy type
 service it would beat down the doors of the telco offering only 3Mbps of
 service. As more and more devices have bandwidth requirements, the
 
 service
 
 providers will fall into line, I believe.

 Everyone has always pushed for more bandwidth, but it as always come
 
 from
 
 the customers as opposed to the devices. It seems like now, the device
 requirements will leave the customer with no choice and force them into
 
 a
 
 decision of higher consumption.

 As far as furthering the digital divide, I don't think it will hurt it
 
 all
 
 that bad. On the contrary what would be nice to see is the
 
 communications
 
 mediums becoming less expensive because of the amount of services
 
 required.
 
 Just like the price of bandwidth has changed over the years, I think it
 
 will
 
 continue to drop. I would love to see some research data on the cost per
 
 MB
 
 over the last 10 years and see what the trend is like.

 That combined with less expensive and functional equipment (UBNT's
 
 Bullet,
 
 the introduction of Mikrotik years ago, for examples) gives operators
 
 the
 
 ability to put more bandwidth than before in users hands at a fraction
 
 of
 
 the cost.

 I think more than anything it will come down to a backhaul battle. Fiber
 
 to
 
 the node, fiber to the AP, high capacity microwave links (Bridgewave,
 Dragonwave, Ceragon, etc) These are all going to be critically important
 
 to
 
 aggregate and transport these huge amounts of data.




 On 11/24/08 1:06 AM, Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 It will further the digital divide. Rural remote locations will be
   
 again left
 
 in the boon docks. Where I live, 3 meg DSL is the fastest available
   
 connection
 
 at $75/mth. Cheapest T1 here is over $600/mth, and fiber? forget it,
   
 can't get
 
 it unless you want to build about 4 towers just to backhaul, or pay
   
 $1200/mth
 
 for each cell tower to put them on.

 Why should the small ISP's foot the bill

Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-11-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Simple as this...

Even if you can supply this bandwidth..

1.  Avg Customer usage goes up.
2.  Over subscription rate goes down.
3.  Network costs go up to meet increased demand
4.  Per Sub costs go up due to the higher usage
5.  Profit per sub goes down.

Increase back-end costs but no increase in profit = Bankrupt Company

Or you can..

1.  Avg Customer Usage goes up
2.  Network costs go up
3.  Avg cost per sub goes up
4.  Pass cost onto customer

Regardless, its business 101.  If your costs put you into a position 
that your existing pricing don't make enough money, you have to, reduce 
costs, or increase income.  The idea is how to do this without loosing 
customers (some you will anyways).  But as Sam said, loose the high end 
customers that use your network and keep on trucking.  Comcast I think 
did this a while back, dumping around 2000 subscribers, due to their 
usage!   Why do you think also sat connections have that FAP, cause they 
can't just upgrade their backhauls etc  Its a major expense.

One argument that I have had people tell me, is that the ISP should know 
this is coming and should have planned for it.  Cost of doing business.  
I don't think that is true, a small increase in usage yes, but we are 
talking tripling otherwise low usage connections, if not more. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Sam Tetherow wrote:
 Of course they want unlimited.  I want unlimited as well.  But the issue 
 we are going to have to deal with is, is everyone going to be willing to 
 pay for unlimited such that those who are on the top end of the usage 
 spectrum aren't eating our profit?

 How much unused bandwidth do you have on your current network 
 connection(s)?  If one third of your existing customers increased their 
 monthly bandwidth by 80GB (1.5mbit)  during peak hours (6pm to 10pm) 
 would your existing infrastructure be able to handle the increased load 
 or would you have to build out more infrastructure.  Would your monthly 
 upstream cost increase and if so by how much?  Do you think you would 
 lose customers if you had to up their rates regardless of their usage 
 (so that everyone can have their unlimited plan) or do you think it 
 would be less disruptive upping the rates on the power users only?

 I'm opting for upping the rates on the power users, it will have one of 
 two effects, either I will collect more from those who use more or I 
 will lose a customer that is costing me more than I am collecting from 
 them.  Obviously keeping the customer is the desired outcome, but I not 
 willing to pay for him on a monthly basis.

 On a related note how many people have upped their rates and if so how 
 have you faired against competition?

 Sam Tetherow
 Sandhills Wireless

 Travis Johnson wrote:
   
 Hi,

 My telephone service is unlimited (home landline with Qwest) and could 
 be unlimited cell phone with ATT or Sprint. My water is unlimited.

 People want unlimited service so they don't have to guess what their 
 bill is going to be. Even my electricity and gas bills can be setup as 
 level-pay so they are the same each month. The general public does 
 NOT want to guess how much their internet bill is going to be... 
 especially when they can get Dish or Direct TV for unlimited for 
 $29.95 and up.

 Travis
 Microserv

 Sam Tetherow wrote:
 
 The average person watches 4 hours of TV per day.   If we are streaming 
 at 1.5mbit which is somewhere between SDTV and HDTV it is 660MB/hr.  
 This works out to 79.2GB/month per person.  On average I would be that 
 there are at least 2 separate TV views per household (kids vs parents 
 for example).  This would get us to 158.4GB/mn leaving less than 100GB 
 for all other traffic.

 If we run the same for HD which is roughly 2.5mbit or 1.125GB/hr we get 
 135GB/mn per person for HDTV. 

 While 250GB is more than enough by current usage standards if all 
 viewing moves to IP it is not going to take long 250GB to be a pretty 
 tight fit for total monthly bandwidth.

 I pay by the gallon for water, by the kw/hr for electricity, and capped 
 with overage on cell service. 

 Sam Tetherow
 Sandhills Wireless


 Travis Johnson wrote:
   
   
 Honestly, I don't ever see the model changing to metered billing. 
 Telephone service isn't that way. Water service (in my area at least) 
 isn't that way. And yes, some have started, but with 250GB monthly 
 caps, it's not really even a cap.

 Travis
 Microserv

 Sam Tetherow wrote:
 
 
 I couldn't imagine how the logistics of this would work.  What makes 
 sense is if your customer uses more bandwidth, then they 

Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-11-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
The local Gas Co here has budget billing  The bill changes ever 4 
months.  During the winter its low, and the summer its way high, why.  
Winter we use it to heat with, normally I would have 300-400 bills, for 
a few months, but the summer we only use it for cooking, so it would be 
30-40 bucks!  with that I pay around 80-90 bucks a month normally.  I 
guarantee I am paying for ALL of the gas used!  Just spreading it out 
over a number of months.I'm sure though, some months I am ahead, I 
have credit for unused gas, and some months I owe for.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Matt wrote:
 My telephone service is unlimited (home landline with Qwest) and could be
 unlimited cell phone with ATT or Sprint. My water is unlimited.
 

 There is almost always 'fine print' in these unlimited plans.
 Unlimited long distance is almost always not completely unlimited.

   
 People want unlimited service so they don't have to guess what their bill
 is going to be. Even my electricity and gas bills can be setup as
 level-pay so they are the same each month. The general public does NOT
 

 Level pay is not unlimited.  No where close.

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information

2008-11-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Yep. And I would agree there.  I also think, WISPs, and even cable cos 
have the issue that the technology will limit their ability to take this 
increase rapidly.  

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Drew Lentz wrote:
 This is the statement that got me:
   
 One argument that I have had people tell me, is that the ISP should know
 this is coming and should have planned for it.
 

 Whether it is through watching the amount of bandwidth used over periods of
 time as a trend or doing market research to find out what is coming down the
 line in technology, this statement holds pretty strong. Best practices tell
 you to build your network for your needs tomorrow, not for today, not for
 yesterday.






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] manufacturing CPE for customers

2008-11-12 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
By the time you are done, with antenna and such, it usually is not under 
50 bucks.  Not to mention the quality of the product.  Thats always 
something to look at.  We have uninstalled other types of radios, and 
replaced them with MT CPEs just cause they work! 

It costs more to go back and have the customer mad cause of a radio 
issue... . 


--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Andy Loukes wrote:
 I have seen most of the easily 'googleable' solutions and most of them
 are = $100. We are looking for something very low end and simple for 
 $50. I have had a suggestion that Senao has something in this ballpark.

 BTW apologies for the slightly incoherent email before. I was
 interrupted whilst writing it and didn't re-read...

 Thanks for the replies,

 Andy

   
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 On
   
 Behalf Of Charles Wyble
 Sent: 11 November 2008 18:09
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] manufacturing CPE for customers

 Andy,

 Have you seen www.routerboard.com ? They have some decent CPE for less
 then 100.00.


 Andy Loukes wrote:
 
 Hi

 iam looking some one to help me getting smalled board with low cost
 CPE for indoor use with the support of OpenWRT

 one lan + one wan + 1 ap

 contact me offline with specs and price

 Ram




 
 -
   
 --
 
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 -
   
 --
 
 -

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 

   
 -
   
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 -
   
 ---
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   


 
 ---
   
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 ---
   
 -

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I do prefer the 433AHs, however if you are only putting a single radio 
card on it, then the 411A vs 433 is wash.  Same processor, same RAM as 
the 433.  If you are not doing much with it, it should work fine.  Going 
to multiple radios per board, 433AH, is the way to go though. 


--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Josh Luthman wrote:
 When I read However, pings from the client to my office will drop for an
 intermittent time period several times an hour. I believe he was referring
 from the CPE radio to his office PC/core.

 RB411 is meant for a CPE device.  RB433 is meant for an AP.

 If your customers are happy and paying their bill the RB411 is an excellent
 choice.  Personally I put the RB433AH on the tower regardless of expansion
 is expected or not.  The cost of replacing the router in the middle of
 deployment is way more then the price difference between the RB433 and
 RB433AH (AH simply means bigger cpu/more memory).

 You did avoid the 1xx and 5xx series and used the 4xx - that was a wise
 choice!

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 What is the client radio? What does the networking look like. My first
 guess would be a crappy customer side router which is either having
 issues with an ARP table or connection table filling up.

 Sam Tetherow
 Sandhills Wireless

 Steve Barnes wrote:
 
 I have a odd issue(as always).

 First of all I have a 180 sector with a RB411 XR2 3.15 OS 44 Clients.
 Can that board handle that load running B everyone at 2MB?  All CPE's
 are Tranzeo TR19

 Next I have 3 clients off of that sector with the same issue.  Pings
 from my office to the CPE NEVER drop.  However, pings from the client to
 my office will drop for an intermittent time period several times an
 hour.  I have visited 2 of the clients. With my laptop connected to the
 POE, when everything is working I can winbox into the tower to watch
 what happens,  with a ping running from my laptop to my office.  As soon
 as the pings stop I start looking at the tower, the Winbox never loses
 connection.  But I can't ping the web, I can't browse the web and
 tracert stop between the CPE and the tower.  But I am still connected
 and have full access to the Tower with winbox.  Pings from the tower to
 the CPE never fail or change time nor do pings from my office.  When the
 client first complained I had them setup a VNC connection to take
 control of their PC assuming they were clueless.  With VNC from my
 office I started a ping on their PC and watched it start failing, I
 NEVER LOST CONNECTION WITH VNC. I could stop and start a ping do a
 tracert and to make sure I even rebooted the pc.  So TCP level still
 works.  Have replaced radios POE's, and some cables at one but since I
 now have 3 doing it I am pretty sure it's the AP.

 HELP

 Steve Barnes
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
 (765)584-2288




   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] How NOT to take down your new used tower!

2008-11-04 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
looked like fun! :)

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Blair Davis wrote:
 idiots

 Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Yikes

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiivRoXLkSMfeature=related

 Gotta be a better way to do this.
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] MikroTik simple queues

2008-11-03 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Change the burst time to 60s/60s and you will be CLOSE to 30 second 
burst.   

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Josh Luthman wrote:
 Here is what I believe you want.  It will let the customer use 3M but if for
 30 seconds the customer exceeds 512kb/s they're capped at 1536kb/s.

 /queue simple
 add burst-limit=300/300 burst-threshold=512000/512000 burst-time=\
 30s/30s comment= direction=both disabled=no dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 \
 interface=all limit-at=0/0 max-limit=1536000/1536000
 name=blair4noobcstmr \
 parent=none priority=8 queue=default-small/default-small \
 target-addresses=172.16.0.101/32 total-queue=default-small

 Fish sounds good for dinner.  Thanks for the tip.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
 --- Henry Spencer


 On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
  Ok.  I can live with a 1Mb/s limit with a short burst to 3Mb/s

 But how?

 I've managed to make simple queues do bandwidth limiting.  But making the
 bursting work seems to be a different kettle of fish

 Josh Luthman wrote:

 You can easily do that minus the very last part about the last 30s
 usage in simple queues.



 On 10/31/08, Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Anyone out here know about MikroTik Simple Queues?

 I'm trying to get something like this...

 user with 1Mb/s limit can burst to 3Mb/s for 30sec but only if his average
 use in the previous 30sec is below 512Kb/s

 I've tried several things, but I am just not getting it to work.

 The objective is to speed web surfing and email while preventing long
 running downloads/uploads from plugging up the network for others.

 Anyone done this?








 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New form of RSTP?

2008-10-31 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
There is RSTP in current revisions of MT.   Is there a reason its not a 
routed backbone though?  Failover etc works so much better. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



John Scrivner wrote:
 I am starting to think I am going crazy. Actually I have suspected this for
 a long time now.  grin
 I was sure I saw a recent announcement here from Mikrotik that they have
 developed a new proprietary form of RSTP (reliable spanning tree protocol)
 type of layer 2 fail over support and now I cannot find this when I search
 for it. If anyone else saw this announcement can you please reply with a
 link to the story about this? I am building a backhaul ring in my network
 and want layer 2 failover for this backhaul ring. I am considering using
 Mikrotik. If anyone has similar experience with actual RSTP switching
 failover in the field and want to share your thoughts on implementation,
 issues and/or other similar options I would welcome your thoughts.
 Thank you,
 John Scrivner


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Equip Leasing

2008-10-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Please do not Advertise on the list!  This is not permitted.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



3-dB Networks wrote:
 Yes...

 Everyone check out our website article here.
 http://www.3dbnetworks.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=126

 It describes in detail the various funding options out there and why you
 should choose each option.  It was written by Todd Bergstrom, the former CEO
 of Mesa Networks and the CEO of 3-dB Networks.

 If you go here
 http://www.3dbnetworks.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=128

 We have a link and some information about the company we used for our
 financing when we were Mesa, Landmark Financial.  They are a great company
 to work with, and truly understand the WISP industry.

 If you need some Motorola gear for that financing, we may be able to work
 out a special deal for you...

 Daniel White
 3-dB Networks

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:07 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Equip Leasing

 Does anyone have a good relationship with a reputable equipment  
 leasing firm? If so, who are you using?

 Thanks
 Chris Cooper
   



 
 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue Oct 10th, 2008

2008-10-22 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Just a FYI, I got this from Mikrotik..   I wanted to make sure I sent it 
out to everyone..


The tranzeo timestamp issues comes from tranzeo implementing a timestamp 
check that is not included in the 802.11 standard for ap to client 
communications.

The timestamp check is included in the standard for the adhoc (IBSS) 
wireless mode (which is not commonly used and Mikrotik does not support) 
-- and there is are reasons that it is included in adhoc mode and not in 
ap to client mode.

The standard requires clients to accept the beacon timestamp 
unconditionally in ap to client mode.  Tranzeo has added a specific 
check because they said they thought it is logical that the check be 
applied to ap to client mode.  Good standards implementations do not add 
things to a standard.  These standards are made by IEEE committees of 
engineers that are very specific on what they include and don't 
include.  If a company wants to change a standard, then they need to 
join the committee and, through peer review, get a new standard approved.

We have made a work-around for their violation of the standard.  But 
rather than somebody saying thank you, the old saying of 'no good deed 
goes unpunished' is proven again.  We make many work-arounds for 
incorrect standards implementations and extension by companies such as 
Microsoft, Realtek, and now Tranzeo.  We do that to help our customers, 
but in reality, the vendors that do not follow the standards should fix 
the problem.

In summary, it is very unfair that we are blamed for problems made by 
another company that does not implement the standard correctly.  Many 
people in this business don't do it just for money, but because they 
like making things (be it WISP or equipment for WISP).  Rants without 
basis kind of put a wet blanket on the whole party.

For those that would like to research this, here a clear reference from 
the 802.11 standard that is pertinent:

 From 802.11-2007, 11.1.1.1 TSF for infrastructure networks:
... A receiving STA shall always accept the timing information in Beacon
frames sent from the AP servicing its BSS. If a STAâEUR^(TM)s TSF timer 
is different
from the timestamp in the received Beacon frame, the receiving STA shall 
set
its local TSF timer to the received timestamp value.

Tranzeo decided to assume that receiving a beacon with timestamp less 
than in previous beacon indicates that the AP has restarted (the 
standard has another method to handle restarted ap units).  This check 
is not in the standard and this a tranzeo addition to the standard that 
has cause the disconnect problem that Ryan has suffered from.

Regards,

Mikrotik

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



D. Ryan Spott wrote:
 Oh don't think I have not tried to shame them into this MULTIPLE times... :)

 Damian! Get on it!

 ryan

 -Original Message-
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:43 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue 
 Oct 10th, 2008

 Now if they would just drop a mere $1000 to join WISPA as a Vendor
 Member they would earn mine. I use their products every day. I have
 asked them to join, face to face, at shows as recently as the last
 WiMax World a month ago. Tranzeo benefits regularly from WISPA but as
 yet seems reluctant to support our industry efforts.
 Scriv


 On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 I read every word. Tranzeo has earned my respect.

 Kurt Fankhauser
 WAVELINC
 P.O. Box 126
 Bucyrus, OH 44820
 419-562-6405
 www.wavelinc.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of D. Ryan Spott
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:04 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List; Mikrotik discussions; Mikrotik
 Users Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue
 Oct 10th, 2008

 Ladies and Gentlemen,

 (Please pardon my extensive use of () and  in this here email, I am
 not so good with the typin' stuff!

 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 A few weeks ago (years in some cases, hi Travis!) there was discovered a
 random disconnect issue between Tranzeo CPE and Mtik APs.

 First it was prism vs atheos (no, that was not it)
 Then it was tranzeo CPE are terrible. Yadda Yadda (no that is not it
 either as even MTIK CPE were seing this, although not as often)
 Then it was you must have some power issue with the boards browning out
 on the routeros board you are using (nope, not that either)
 Someone even threw in Pluto is mad that it is not a planet any more.
 (Pluto is now considered the largest member of a 

Re: [WISPA] NOC

2008-10-22 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I like the lonely plants scattered about. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
 Looks like Tim Hogard's basement to me.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:00 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] NOC


   
 Here's a NOC...

 http://www.telstra.com.au/abouttelstra/images/media/photos/73764g2_hires.jpg


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RouterOS version 3.15 released!

2008-10-16 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Believe it is..   But its not just for Tranzeo though.. 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Steve Barnes wrote:
 Anyone know if this is the Tranzeo fix for MT.  It does not state that
 in the Change log but fixes timing issues and some connection issues.

 Steve Barnes
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue...

2008-10-02 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I strongly urge everyone to send me off-list at [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
any suppouts videos, screen shots of this issue.  I have an open case 
with MT.  If you send it over, I will continue to gather information 
etc, and continue to work with MT on this issue.

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Travis Johnson wrote:
 This is NOT just a MT/Tranzeo issue. If you search the forums, people 
 were talking about this issue over 6 months ago with various clients. 
 We are running 100% MT (AP and clients) and we see the issue across 
 ALL of our AP's.

 Travis
 Microserv

 D. Ryan Spott wrote:
 Steve and Eje,

 There is a bit of a forum thread here describing the issue:

 http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=24971

 Tranzeo and Mtik are working on it.


 On Oct 2, 2008, at 5:19 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:

   
 So let me get this right. If you have Tranzeo CPE's you only use  
 StarOS.
 MT does not work.  Does Mikrotik even acknowledge that this is a issue
 and do they have plans to fix it.

 Part of the issue is I could not make Cisco VPN's work with StarOS  
 V3 AP
 and a Tranzeo CPE.  Had to change to a StarOS CPE.  Now I changed to  
 the
 MT AP and the StarOS CPE didn't work right. So I changed the CPE  
 back to
 a Tranzeo, VPN's work great now but the Tower reboots.  ARG!

 Steve Barnes
 Executive Manager
 PCS-WIN
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
 (765)584-2288

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:50 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue...

 I do wish the Tranzeos had a ping watchdog feature...
 - Original Message -
 From: Eje Gustafsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue...


 
 Odd behavior. This must be a mismatch in the protocol between the
   
 Tranzeo
 
 units and MikroTik. We have tested many different units (E-zy.net,
 Senao/Engenius, MikroTik, Ubiquiti as well Teletronics) and never  
 seen
   
 this
 behavior you describe. However I do recall way back someone had very
 strange
 behaviors going on between Tranzeo units and his MikroTik AP. He had
   
 some
 
 Senao CB3 units and some Smartbridges that he swapped some of the
   
 Tranzeo
 
 units with and the problems with those clients went away.
 Not sure what the Tranzeo units are or are not doing when
   
 communicating
 
 with
 the MikroTik AP thought this been long since fixed but if it was the
 problem
 seems to once again surfaced.

 / Eje

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 On
 
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:20 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: Scott Reed; Blake King; Rick Harnish
 Subject: [WISPA] Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue...

 I am wondering about a resolution on this. I had a failing StarOS
   
 Board
 
 so I switched out to a Mikotik RB411 v3.10.  Now all 45 of my clients
 (all are Tranzeo) reset every few minutes. Normally 5min.

 I have also noticed that at times the signal Strength on my clients  
 go
 super high like a client at -68 will be at -98.  However, if I ping
   
 that
 
 client they drop back to the -68. As soon as you stop the Ping the
 signal strength on the AP goes back to -99.  If I reboot the Radio it
 sets everyone back to Really good signal strength for a while then it
 starts to climb.  I had no one over -80 on the star board.  I just  
 had
 12 clients the MT said was at -112 to -116.  Ping them and during the
 ping they are back to -68.

 Help.  I will be a guinea pig if someone wants to look at my tower
   
 from
 
 MT.  it can't get much Worse.

 Steve Barnes
 Executive Manager
 PCS-WIN
 RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
 (765)584-2288



   
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

   
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] Gotta love lighting....

2008-06-29 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Mark,

We are NOT far at all, in House Springs, just south of St. Louis.  Rolla 
is just about 1 1/2 hours from us!

Give Jim a call on his cell at 314-565-6863.  We are a MT distributor 
and can get you whatever you need! 

--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/

*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training 
http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp/*



Mark McElvy wrote:
 I have lost three towers in the last two days. I got one back this
 morning and may be able to get a second up this afternoon if it will
 quit raining. The third tower I need some equipment for. I am in central
 Missouri, near Rolla, and need RB532 or equivalent, an XR2, and a
 Tranzeo TR5a-24.  If anyone can help that is close by, 4to 5 hr drive,
 please call. 

  

 Mark McElvy
 AccuBak Data Systems, Inc.
 573.247.9980 - Mobile
  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tiger Direct is Breaking the Law

2008-06-02 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
it is'ent like its hard to find other companies selling this.  Amazon is 
selling it too, as well as compusa. .. The issue is that its not over 
powering the band?  Assuming its a 500mw amp thats basically 27 db, so 
if they have a 7 dbi omni on it, thats 34 dbi, under the limit

The only issue is that more of these devices we have out there, the less 
OUR stuff works. 

Travis, 1 watt amps are not illegal, its just illegal to use with an 
antenna more than 6db.  p2mp only of course.

But same difference, it should not be able to be used as it generates 
more interference and causes other issues, and yes, its not start to use 
etc.  But I don't think there is anything the FCC could do.  Other than 
its not a FCC Certified device...

--
Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc
http://www.linktechs.net
314-735-0270


John Scrivner wrote:
 There is no way this is close to legal:

 Tiger Direct Wi-Fi Booster
 Amphttp://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3522757CatId=374gclid=CLCogIud1pMCFRQXsgodo2xwjg

 Does the FCC have a place where we can report this crap? This is flagrant
 abuse of the band and will lead to less usability of 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for our
 purposes if we do not stand up and stop this type of behavior from vendors
 who sell crap.
 Scriv


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tiger Direct is Breaking the Law

2008-06-02 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
I agree, just saying that there is more than one vendor selling crap.  I 
don't think there is much we can do about it.  Just have to know its out 
there! 
--
Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc
http://www.linktechs.net
314-735-0270


Blair Davis wrote:
 Let's not start the Certified 'Antenna Systems' thing again.

 Please!

 Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote:
   
 it is'ent like its hard to find other companies selling this.  Amazon is 
 selling it too, as well as compusa. .. The issue is that its not over 
 powering the band?  Assuming its a 500mw amp thats basically 27 db, so 
 if they have a 7 dbi omni on it, thats 34 dbi, under the limit

 The only issue is that more of these devices we have out there, the less 
 OUR stuff works. 

 Travis, 1 watt amps are not illegal, its just illegal to use with an 
 antenna more than 6db.  p2mp only of course.

 But same difference, it should not be able to be used as it generates 
 more interference and causes other issues, and yes, its not start to use 
 etc.  But I don't think there is anything the FCC could do.  Other than 
 its not a FCC Certified device...

 --
 Dennis Burgess
 Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 Link Technologies, Inc
 http://www.linktechs.net
 314-735-0270


 John Scrivner wrote:
   
 
 There is no way this is close to legal:

 Tiger Direct Wi-Fi Booster
 Amphttp://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3522757CatId=374gclid=CLCogIud1pMCFRQXsgodo2xwjg

 Does the FCC have a place where we can report this crap? This is flagrant
 abuse of the band and will lead to less usability of 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for our
 purposes if we do not stand up and stop this type of behavior from vendors
 who sell crap.
 Scriv


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
 
   
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] traffic reporting

2008-05-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Trends IWSS Does this, full reporting, plus gives you anti-virus and 
Anti-SPAM protection.. 

YOu an load that up on a server, or purchase their hardware box.
--
Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
Link Technologies, Inc
http://www.linktechs.net


Travis Johnson wrote:
 Hi,

 I posted this message a few months ago, and never found anything that 
 was what I needed, so I'm posting again. :)

 I have several school districts looking for a way to monitor their 
 internet traffic. They want to see where each IP address is going, etc. 
 They do NOT need filtering or any bandwidth management or anything like 
 that... just a reporting system. It can't be a proxy system or anything 
 that will require them to change all the client settings.

 I would prefer some type of a linux solution that I could put on a box 
 with two ethernet ports and just run as transparent bridging.

 Any suggestions?

 thanks,

 Travis
 Microserv


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Internet Outage / South Park episode

2008-04-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net
Southpark Crude!!!  NEVER!!  ahahahhaa..

Mark Nash wrote:
 I watch South Park religiously...

 That said...if you watch the full episode...

 fair warning...part of this episode is extremely crude

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message - 
 From: John Valenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:14 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Internet Outage / South Park episode


   
 One of the Chicago Tribune bloggers discusses an outage at his house
 in this posting:
 http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/eric2_0/2008/04/real-life-
 imita.html

 He includes a clip from South Park that I gather is recent (we're an
 OTA family, so I'm several seasons behind).

 I think many on this list will appreciate it; and help understand the
 value of our work.   :-)



 --
 
 --
   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 
 --
   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

-- 
--
Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
Link Technologies, Inc
http://www.linktechs.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Future

2008-04-23 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
And what do you use to control that bandwidth? 

Chuck McCown wrote:
 We sell 10.2 Mbps burst service.  And most of them actually get that speed.
 If they start streaming or downloading a large file, we throttle them down. 
 Most are at 768.
 When the stream or download stops, they go back to wide open throttle. 
 Customers love it.

 - Original Message - 
 From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:41 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


   
 Chuck,

 What speeds do you sell to your end customers at 128:1 oversub?

 (I am assuming that you never really go this high!) :)

 ryan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:33 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 That is pretty much what we do on Motorola Canopy.
 20 MHz channels.
 128:1 (or less) over subscription
 10 Mbps
 First AP and BH would be in the $5K range
 Second AP would be in the $2K range.  (depending on antennas etc).

 We are waiting to see what the OFDM product will do.  Smaller channels.
 More speed.
 (more money too).

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


 
 Anyone doing a 20 MHz channel?

 Would that be enough capacity to allow for typical oversubscription on 
 say
   
 a
 10 meg client?

 What does it cost to get the first AP up ($5k, $15k, $50k)?

 What does it cost to get additional APs up ($2k, $10k, $30k)?


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


   
 Chuck,

 Airspan / Aperto are both shipping 5x Ghz wimax products.

 Throughput is about 26mb peak for the Airspan product on 10mhz
 channels, and 22mb on the Aperto product in 7mhz channels. Also, there
 are ways to get around the exclusion zones, if you find out who the
 licenseholders are.



 -

 Jeff

 On Apr 21, 2008, at 1:20 PM, CHUCK PROFITO wrote:

 
 Patrick,
 Excellent point on channel sizes!
 So if WiMAX is released in unlicensed frequencies of 900, 2.4? ,
 5.X, 3.6
 (we are in a big exclusion zone.)
 I imagine if you deployed in 2.4 it would smoke the home routers.
 Would our capacity double for the same channel sizes?
 Would it use the same channel sizes?
 Would it help with range and capacity?
 Will WiMax help tree penetration? Can Physics be bent?
 In legacy deployments, would or could it improve our back hauls?


 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of CHUCK PROFITO
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:01 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 Patrick,
 If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
 what are the real numbers on the fixed, for say:
 2 miles los?
 2 miles wooded?
 5 m los?
 5 m nlos?
 10 m los?
 10 m nlos
 ??
 Is this a fair question?

 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:14 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The press has been wrong most of time, causing companies like ours
 great
 headaches. The stupid 70 miles 30 mbps was the most absurd bit of
 hyperbole that the press picked up and repeated endlessly.
 Meanwhile, Mo
 Shakouri (the Marketing VP of the WiMAX Forum and an Alvarion exec)
 was
 trying to dispel that at every turn (I sat in on many of his public
 sessions). Others of us also were trying to correct the
 expectations. I
 did it in numerous analyst and press interviews.

 WiMAX is also doing well overseas, especially in Asia. WiMAX's
 greatest
 near term challenge in the U.S. is Sprint.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:57 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMax as hyped by the press is dead.  No?

 - Original Message -
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


   
 I agree with the vast majority of what Chuck says here and only
 partially disagree even on the WiMAX part (though I disagree strongly
 
 on
   
 the WiMAX is dead part -- we have sold over $100M to date of it).

 The main takeaway with Chuck's post is that WISPs will have strong
 opportunities for a 

[WISPA] Interesting FCC Testimony

2008-04-23 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
http://lessig.org/blog/2008/04/testifying_fcc_stanford.html

Interesting presentation.  On Net Neutrality. 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] RB532 replacement...

2008-04-13 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Nope, if your vendors have them, thats all they are getting. 

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant / Trainer
www.linktechs.net
WISP/ISP Support Solutions
Home of the PoweRouter 732! 



Blair Davis wrote:
 I was told that while the 532 was EOL, the 532A would remain available 
 for a while yet...

 Mark McElvy wrote:
   
 Since RB532s are no longer available, what is everyone using to replace
 them? It would be nice not to have to replace the box again (using the
 7x6x2's from wisp-router) and I am not quite ready to run v3 on my
 network. Any suggestions?

  

 Mark McElvy



  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] RB532 replacement...

2008-04-13 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Good idea!   :) 

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant / Trainer
www.linktechs.net
WISP/ISP Support Solutions
Home of the PoweRouter 732! 



Blair Davis wrote:
 2 reasons

 I've made it a point to make all my tower equipment use the same power 
 to eliminate the need to keep different spares on hand.  At one time I 
 had lots of different types of power supplies for different things. 

 And it is much harder to kill equipment by accident if they all use 
 the same power.

 one last thing...  I've never had problems with voltage drop on a 48V 
 system... no matter if the cable run is 50ft or 300ft.  I remember 
 having to pick the power supply vs the cable length before.  This, to 
 me, is a step backwards.

 I no longer replace just the board.  I have a standard build of board, 
 enclosure,static protection and so on...  we just undo the u-bolts, 
 disconnect the LMR and ethernet and swap.  We never open the 
 weatherproof enclosure in the air any more.

  
 Travis Johnson wrote:
 You have to replace the board (which means a tower visit) so why not 
 just replace the PoE at the same time?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Blair Davis wrote:
 My problems with the replacements is the power supply.

 I use only 48V POE for my towers... and most of the new gear is not 48V.

 So now I'm looking for small 48V to 24V DC-DC converters...



 Dennis Burgess - Link Techs wrote:
 3x is what is out.  The 133 and 133c's are EOL, as are the 532s, 150s 
 and for most part the entire 100 series boards.  Figure you will have to 
 start using 400s, 300, and 600s.

 We do have new cases, nice hinged enclousers and build to spec our 
 routerboard series. These will fit the 333's without issues.  We are 
 just getting ready to put up a dual-pol n-stream link with 600s, think 2 
 foot on one side and 3 foot dish on the other.   

 I'm sure we will post the information on our MT list...

 Scott Reed wrote:
   
 I understand you don't want v3, but I have been moving to RB333s with 
 3.x and have had no issues at all.  They boot faster and support more 
 radios.  RB600 uses same mounting holes and daughter cards.  I have one 
 600 ready to install, but have none in production, yet.
 I put up a POP with 3 333s on 3RC9 and they are still running on RC12.  
 I should get them up to 3.6 or 3.7, but that takes time.  I have a 330 
 running 3.3 that is doing great as well.  I have everything from a RB230 
 running 2.8.x to 532s running all sorts of 2.9 along with the 330s.
 At this point I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and start 
 moving to 3.x and the newer cards.

 Mark McElvy wrote:
   
 
 Since RB532s are no longer available, what is everyone using to replace
 them? It would be nice not to have to replace the box again (using the
 7x6x2's from wisp-router) and I am not quite ready to run v3 on my
 network. Any suggestions?

  

 Mark McElvy



  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 
   
   
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: 

Re: [WISPA] RB532 replacement...

2008-04-13 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
This is a major issue and all you can do is plan for it.  The stepdown 
from 48 to 24 or 18 is much less of a worry vs AC/DC - DC/AC 
conversion.  The loss should be minimal, and transformers like this, 
should not fail often.  They are simple devices and are relitivly cheap 
and replaceable. 

I do understand, how easy it would be to use all 48 volt.  We even had a 
number of requests for -48v Power Supplies in our PoweRouters.  12 volt 
is easy, the -48 it s a bit harder.  Lots of telco rooms etc use these.

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant / Trainer
www.linktechs.net
WISP/ISP Support Solutions
Home of the PoweRouter 732! 



Travis Johnson wrote:
 Well, it seems a step backward to install a 24v to 48v converter and 
 thus add another point of failure, instead of just replacing the PoE.

 All of the new boards only support up to 28V, so unless you are going 
 to continue to find old boards on the used market, at some point you 
 will have to switch to 24V.

 Travis
 Microserv

 Blair Davis wrote:
 2 reasons

 I've made it a point to make all my tower equipment use the same 
 power to eliminate the need to keep different spares on hand.  At one 
 time I had lots of different types of power supplies for different 
 things. 

 And it is much harder to kill equipment by accident if they all use 
 the same power.

 one last thing...  I've never had problems with voltage drop on a 48V 
 system... no matter if the cable run is 50ft or 300ft.  I remember 
 having to pick the power supply vs the cable length before.  This, to 
 me, is a step backwards.

 I no longer replace just the board.  I have a standard build of 
 board, enclosure,static protection and so on...  we just undo the 
 u-bolts, disconnect the LMR and ethernet and swap.  We never open the 
 weatherproof enclosure in the air any more.

  
 Travis Johnson wrote:
 You have to replace the board (which means a tower visit) so why not 
 just replace the PoE at the same time?

 Travis
 Microserv

 Blair Davis wrote:
 My problems with the replacements is the power supply.

 I use only 48V POE for my towers... and most of the new gear is not 
 48V.

 So now I'm looking for small 48V to 24V DC-DC converters...



 Dennis Burgess - Link Techs wrote:
 3x is what is out.  The 133 and 133c's are EOL, as are the 532s, 150s 
 and for most part the entire 100 series boards.  Figure you will have to 
 start using 400s, 300, and 600s.

 We do have new cases, nice hinged enclousers and build to spec our 
 routerboard series. These will fit the 333's without issues.  We are 
 just getting ready to put up a dual-pol n-stream link with 600s, think 2 
 foot on one side and 3 foot dish on the other.   

 I'm sure we will post the information on our MT list...

 Scott Reed wrote:
   
 I understand you don't want v3, but I have been moving to RB333s with 
 3.x and have had no issues at all.  They boot faster and support more 
 radios.  RB600 uses same mounting holes and daughter cards.  I have one 
 600 ready to install, but have none in production, yet.
 I put up a POP with 3 333s on 3RC9 and they are still running on RC12.  
 I should get them up to 3.6 or 3.7, but that takes time.  I have a 330 
 running 3.3 that is doing great as well.  I have everything from a RB230 
 running 2.8.x to 532s running all sorts of 2.9 along with the 330s.
 At this point I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and start 
 moving to 3.x and the newer cards.

 Mark McElvy wrote:
   
 
 Since RB532s are no longer available, what is everyone using to replace
 them? It would be nice not to have to replace the box again (using the
 7x6x2's from wisp-router) and I am not quite ready to run v3 on my
 network. Any suggestions?

  

 Mark McElvy



  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 
   
   
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   

 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] uptime

2008-04-12 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I have a number of hotspot Mikrotiks up 200+ days.. I have seen some 
over 400 days too, usually we reboot them just to update software 
though. lol


Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant / Trainer
www.linktechs.net
WISP/ISP Support Solutions
Home of the PoweRouter 732! 



Eric Rogers wrote:
 Not nearly as impressive, but this is on a tower...

 Motorola Backhaul:
 Uptime   1y, 98d, 10:54:41



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] uptime

 Hi,

 I just had to get into a Cisco 3512XL switch that we have installed in a

 commercial office building. While there, I happened to notice:

 Taylors uptime is 4 years, 13 weeks, 2 days, 2 hours, 36 minutes

 That's pretty amazing considering it's only on a BackUPS 350 (about 20 
 minutes of battery) and moves about 30Mbps daily. :)

 Any other uptime stats?

 Travis
 Microserv


 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Intel-based 4-port Fast Ethernet Card - StarOS

2008-03-17 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
MT does BGP and Bandwitdh shaping. Much simpler to use compaired to 
star, at least you get a graphic interface.N-Stream does the same thing.

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
www.linktechs.net



George Rogato wrote:
 Ok
 What about Butch?
 Butch can maybe better define the difference between MT and Star as a 
 router considering Star V3 which has been out for a while now. I see 
 Butch on the Star forums, so I'm assuming he knows both quite well.

 Star does BGP and bandwidth shaping, it's done bandwidth shaping for as 
 long as I can remember, and I started using it before it was known as 
 star-os.

 It also does duplex, not sure if it's true duplex, but stars duplex uses 
 two radios, one to send and one to receive. Not sure how much of a 
 difference it is between n stream.






 David E. Smith wrote:
   
 Not to be antagonistic, but rather to be better educated, let me ask you
 this.
 What does MT do that Star doesn't do in the routing arena?
   
 In terms of just routing and basic firewalling, the two are fairly
 comparable. I'm putting more and more Mikrotik RouterOS in my network
 because of all the nifty extra stuff it does better than StarOS (or that
 StarOS doesn't do, period). Keep in mind my shopping list is based mainly
 upon StarOS 2.x.

 * Nstreme Dual, a proprietary extension that would be great for busy
 backhauls (you put in two radio cards and have a full-duplex link, one
 dedicated to transmit and one to receive at each side of the link) I've
 never actually used this but it sure sounds nifty...
 * the ability to act as both a client and a server for pretty much every
 type of VPN out there (StarOS can do some of this, but it's limited by
 comparison)
 * BGP (this existed in StarOS 2.x, but was taken out of early 3.x
 releases, I heard StarOS might be getting it back someday) and MPLS
 * ridiculously extensive traffic shaping/queuing capability
 * pretty GUI (this could be a plus or a minus, actually, as the SSH
 interface to RouterOS is pretty blah while StarOS' console is quite nice)

 Ultimately, though, I'd say this sort of thing is about 95% personal
 preference. For many basic jobs, both of 'em will work just fine; might as
 well get the one with which you're more familiar.

 David Smith
 MVN.net




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Intel-based 4-port Fast Ethernet Card - StarOS

2008-03-17 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Well,

I am no Butch, but I do have a number of customers using BGP on GigE 
Connections.   I would say that in v2.12 - 2.29 ya, there were some bgp 
bugs and plus the implementation was not 100% ..  Most of v3 has been 
built from the ground up.  WebProxy for instance is awesome in v3. I 
do not know if it is different.

I know it will take to Zebra, Qugga and Cisco.   Also IPv6 Support for 
BGP is in there.

Also don't forget about Multicast and MPLS is also Available now.

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
www.linktechs.net



Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Butch,

 I agree the MT graphical interface for configuring BGP, OSPF, and 
 stuff, is pretty nice.

 Can you tell us more about MT's BGP. Is it Quagga, GateD, or their Own?

 There had been reports that in the past, BGP was buggy on MT, but NOT 
 buggy anymore with more recent V3 code.
 I was just wondering because I was wondering about compatibilty with 
 other third party BGP implementations used by upstreams using 
 different platforms.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - From: Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:01 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Intel-based 4-port Fast Ethernet Card - StarOS


 MT does BGP and Bandwitdh shaping. Much simpler to use compaired to
 star, at least you get a graphic interface.N-Stream does the same 
 thing.

 Dennis Burgess
 Mikrotik Certified Consultant
 www.linktechs.net



 George Rogato wrote:
 Ok
 What about Butch?
 Butch can maybe better define the difference between MT and Star as a
 router considering Star V3 which has been out for a while now. I see
 Butch on the Star forums, so I'm assuming he knows both quite well.

 Star does BGP and bandwidth shaping, it's done bandwidth shaping for as
 long as I can remember, and I started using it before it was known as
 star-os.

 It also does duplex, not sure if it's true duplex, but stars duplex 
 uses
 two radios, one to send and one to receive. Not sure how much of a
 difference it is between n stream.






 David E. Smith wrote:

 Not to be antagonistic, but rather to be better educated, let me 
 ask you
 this.
 What does MT do that Star doesn't do in the routing arena?

 In terms of just routing and basic firewalling, the two are fairly
 comparable. I'm putting more and more Mikrotik RouterOS in my network
 because of all the nifty extra stuff it does better than StarOS (or 
 that
 StarOS doesn't do, period). Keep in mind my shopping list is based 
 mainly
 upon StarOS 2.x.

 * Nstreme Dual, a proprietary extension that would be great for busy
 backhauls (you put in two radio cards and have a full-duplex link, one
 dedicated to transmit and one to receive at each side of the link) 
 I've
 never actually used this but it sure sounds nifty...
 * the ability to act as both a client and a server for pretty much 
 every
 type of VPN out there (StarOS can do some of this, but it's limited by
 comparison)
 * BGP (this existed in StarOS 2.x, but was taken out of early 3.x
 releases, I heard StarOS might be getting it back someday) and MPLS
 * ridiculously extensive traffic shaping/queuing capability
 * pretty GUI (this could be a plus or a minus, actually, as the SSH
 interface to RouterOS is pretty blah while StarOS' console is quite 
 nice)

 Ultimately, though, I'd say this sort of thing is about 95% personal
 preference. For many basic jobs, both of 'em will work just fine; 
 might as
 well get the one with which you're more familiar.

 David Smith
 MVN.net




 
  

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
  

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
  

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG.
 Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1332 - Release Date: 
 3/17/2008 10:48 AM

Re: [WISPA] RB333 enclosures

2008-03-08 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
You can also contact Jim Patient at Jeffco SOHO, at 314-565-6863  He 
has some great boxes.

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
www.linktechs.net



Jenco Wireless wrote:
 Hi Mac.  If the RB-333 is about the same size as the RB-600, I use the 14 x
 12.  It's a little tight - I vent them myself so I can change the
 orientation - the RB would probably fit better the way they have them vented
 though.

 http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/nema_enclosures.php

 -- Brad H
 (Jenco Wireless, LLC)


 On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 Can anyone tell me what they are using for an outdoor enclosure for the
 RB333? I just got my first order in and to my great dismay I found out
 that
 the PacWireless enclosures do not have sufficient room to place these in.


 Anyone have a nice solution to share??


 Thanks,
 Mac




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Small generators - cheap or inexpensive?

2008-02-18 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
The LP or Natural Gas is the way to go.  Normally, 100 lbs tanks are simple
and cheap, here around 60 bucks delivered.  It will run a generate for a
good number of hours.  A customer put in a 15k auto gen found it on e-bay
delivered for 2500 bucks!  Ran his NOC twice for 5-6 days each.  Has a 250
tank though for his home heat and range, but other than that, they came out,
hooked up and filled it without him getting out in the cold.  Ran like a
champ.  Keep in mind for this kind of money, it should have the auto start
and transfer switch, also, something to look for in a larger unit is a auto
test.  This unit once a week starts and runs for 5 min.

 

Something you can do with the Nat gas route, is if you have it near your
tower, just get them to hook you up.  Then, no gas to worry about, let'er
run!

 

Dennis Burgess

Link Technologies, Inc.

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 7:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Small generators - cheap or inexpensive?

 

We had a similar experience.  We ran our site for 5 months on a combination
of batteries and generators.  I second the Honda EU and/or Yamaha.  They are
inverter based and do make a better sine wave, or cleaner power.

 

I also noticed we could run our site 8 hrs on a tank of 2.5 gallons on the
Honda 2000 EU, or we could run 8 hrs on a 5 gallon tank with a 5000 watt
larger generator.

 

You definately get what you pay for!!!   Get at least one Honda 2k (or
Yamaha) and then buy a couple backups of the cheap $150-200 generators.
Maintain all of them and you should do ok.

 

Thanks,

 

Eric Rogers

Precision Data Solutions, LLC

(317) 831-3000 x200

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tim Kerns
Sent: Mon 2/18/2008 6:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Small generators - cheap or inexpensive?

John,
We had to run for over a month on generator at the end of last year. (long
story but the place where we contract for one of our towers defaulted on
their loan and the bank took over it took over a month and a break in to
get the power restored).

My point was we used one of the 1000 watt generators from harbor freight,
the one with the Subaru engine. We ran this round the clock, the tank on
them will run about 5-6 hours depending on load. We took a 5 gallon can,
made a spout and connected this to the engine input, bypassing the tank.
This gave us plenty of run time, but still needed to refill daily. The first
generator lasted about 2 weeks before it was stolen (remember the break-in
above), we replaced with the same model and ran it for another 2 weeks.

I was really surprised at it's ability to last that long and expected it to
die after a few days. We found it did use oil and the automatic low oil
sensor did shut us down once. After that we added oil every 2-3 days.


- Original Message -
From: John Valenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 2:40 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Small generators - cheap or inexpensive?


I was looking around for a method to keep at least my backbone
 running during an extended power outage. (we have had ice storms take
 out power for 4 - 7 days).

 It seemed like the small generators might be a solution, the Honda/
 etc name brand ones seem to be ~$600 for 1000 watts. And I found a
 company that sells Yamaha 1000W generators converted to dual fuel (NG
 or propane) for about $1000.  They also sell a 2400 watt generator
 that is triple fuel, gas/NG/propane that is tempting, even at $1600.

 But then I ran across some imported 2 stroke, 1000 watt generators.
 Harbor Freight has them in their catalog for about $150. I found a
 similar one in a local store that is on sale for $99.  The box says
 it will run for 8 hours on tank of gas (at half load, 1.25 gallons).

 These imported ones just seem like they are too cheap.  And I'm not
 too fond of 2 stokes. That Yamaha dealer warns that the cheap
 generators are only designed to last 150 hours - but maybe 150 hours
 for $100 isn't too bad a deal.

 Just wondering if anyone has thoughts or experiences on this issue.
 thanks





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
We did a 18 mile shot, dual n-stream with pre-release v3 dual pol antennas,
and got 35meg with -70 or so.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both
sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get
real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and maybe
if I hold one hand in the air, twist my lips standing on one leg. 

 I mean real world - whatcha getting?? Whatcha see and is it a bench test or
are you in the real WISP world? :)


Mac







 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:51 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
 
 50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode...
 
 Dennis M. Burgess
 Mikrotik Certified Consultant
 Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
 --WISP/Network Support Services--
 +1 314-686-1302
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
 
 Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well.
 
 
 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 1:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
 
 
 I think it's alot easier to deal with Mikrotik as a router  wireless
 AP,
  due to the interface and ease of configuration.  IP addresses, IP
 routes,
  bridging, DHCP, DHCP relay...many many things are very easy to
 configure
  in
  the Mikrotik interface.
 
  That said...the hardware, and the Atheros wireless driver in
 StarOS... I'm
  blown away.  Massive throughput  seriously low latency.  We've
 configured
 
  a
  pair of WAR4-METROs in a PtP link with a SuperAG (40MHz) channel that
 has
  been pulling 70megs aggregate.  There was a comment about how
 expensive
  the
  boards are... I don't think they're expensive at all.
 
  Mark Nash
  UnwiredWest
  78 Centennial Loop
  Suite E
  Eugene, OR 97401
  541-998-
  541-998-5599 fax
  http://www.unwiredwest.com
  - Original Message -
  From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
 
 
 I won't hold you to it mac.
  As long as your running the latest V3 Star-os on all the radios
 involved
  bridging works perfectly.
  I have a mostly all routed network, but I do have a 4 bridged PtP
 shots
  that work just fine. They are the first hops out of my noc to my
  network, Downtime hasn't happened. Nothing has not worked and no
 flakey
  weird issues have cropped up. On PtMP, I have no idea because it's
  routed.
 
  Best price I can find is a star-os or now called Lucaya, wp188
 533MHz 4
  port router that lonnie sells bundled with 4 23db cards in a
  weatherproof enclosure with power supply and poe. The price on that
  board if you pull out the cost of the cards etc is about 120-130.00.
  He's always running YSYL deals that is extra cheap.
 
  And it's 100% FCC certified.
 
  I haven't used MT, so I can't compare the two. I can only tell you
 what
  we have.
 
  George
 
 
  Mac Dearman wrote:
Don't hold me to this, but I have been told from a very super
  reliable
  huge StarOS user that StarOS does not bridge well at all. If you
 are
  counting on bridging from your client/cpe to the AP -- - - StarOS
 is not
  an
  option.
 
  Mac
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Travis Johnson
  Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
  Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
 
  Hi,
 
  Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE
 solution
  to StarOS?
 
  Here is a quick list I have come up with. I would love to have
 everyone
  add their thoughts...
 
  Mikrotik features:
  graphical user interface (Winbox)
  more features (Torch, etc)
  more hardware choices (RB532, RB411, RB600, etc.)
  Nstreme protocol
  very reliable
 
  StarOS features:
  FCC certified CPE
  lower price
  'Sync' feature (reconfigure all CPE from the AP side with a single
  change, such as frequency)
  OLSR feature
  VoIP priority with minimal config
  200 CPE per wireless card (capable)
 
  Travis
  Microserv
 
 
  --
 -
  -
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  --
 -
  -
 
  WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] pppoe server, Redback capability of other solutions?

2008-02-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
We have tested 2600 PPPoE sessions with a PoweRouter 732.  This with ONE
core on only..  Plus, it includes 7 GigE interfaces.  Rackmount etc..

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] pppoe server, Redback capability of other solutions?

All

I'm in the process of moving over to another upstream provider.  I'm
working with them closely to get service to my county PUD system that
uses pppoe tunnels for virtually  all end user connections.   ( I know
that I can get a vlan, but the cost is prohibitive at the moment)

So, I'm their first beta tester in my area and they have this used
Redback router.  First there were problems that were to be solved with
a firmware upgrade, now they have a hardware failure without a spare.
 I'm not familiar with this router at all, but discussed it with their
sysadmin.

Apparently the need is for something that can handle 2000 sessions and
has full 100Mbps NICs and can support that speed. I'm not a pppoe
expert, but would a decent PC, with 4/8GB of RAM and mikrotik SW
installed handle something like this???  Butch?  or other MT experts?
 Or is this requirement way out of the MT league?

For my own reasons, I want to get them going, promptly!  Any
suggestions are greatly appreciated!!

Marshall
Rabbit Meadows Technology




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] pppoe server, Redback capability of other solutions?

2008-02-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
This is an area that MT has shown considerable interest in as well as have
several GOOD hardware products out there.  The 1000 is going to be a
contender.  Not as expandable, but with the price vs performance,  don't
think you can go wrong.  A non MT based product is the PoweRouter 732.
There are treads on MTs forums that list 2600 PPPoE sessions with one of the
processor cores on, moving 30 meg of traffic with power to spare.   

Plus both of these are industrial platforms designed to compete with Cisco.
The 732 has a MTBF of 100,000+ hours.  And I bet the 1000 is about the same.
There are hundreds of WISPs across the world that run MT as their cores
right now.  I think in the next year or two there will be some serious
contenders with MT based systems that will rival many well established
companies, yes like Cisco, and get a decent market share.  

The way I see it, the 732, can replace a 20k Cisco for 7% of the price.  But
as you said, lets not get started on a yours is better than mine war.  Not
the point of the conversation.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clint Ricker
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] pppoe server, Redback capability of other solutions?

I admit that I'm biased against Mikrotik.  It's good for what it is,
but it's value is primarily in its price / flexibility.  It's not
exactly...telco/carrier grade, or however you want to put it.  It's
fine as edge gear, but, not what I'd put in a core role like this.

Perhaps in terms of getting it up and running, you may be quicker with
something that you know and have a good feel for--ie intel hardware
running Mikrotik.  However, in terms of reliability, uptime, and
scalability, (and I'd assume configuration options) Redback is the way
to go.  If you want something that is a little more flexible, go Cisco
(but, you'd pay more for comparable performance).  Price wise,
Redback's are very attractive and very easy to get spare equipment
for.

Plus, you get _good_ hardware.  Not throw CPU cycles at it and keep
some extra boxes in the closet for when it chokes good; I mean swap
out failed power supplies / Ethernet cards / CPUs without any
downtime sort of good.  Using PCs / Mikrotik is good when   you can't
get your hands on good gear at a reasonable cost.  That's not the case
in this situation...

-Clint Ricker
Kentnis Technologies

ps...Please don't turn this into a flame war :).  I realize people
here love Mikrotik, and it has its purposes.  However, in terms of
field tested performance and reliability for PPPoE, Mikrotik is a PC
based platform that has relatively few PPPoE deployments running under
relatively light loads whereas Redback had a really large install base
for high volume PPPoE termination and generally proved itself to be a
very solid and scalable platform.


On Feb 7, 2008 8:40 PM, Eric Muehleisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Redback is untouchable in terms of PPPoE aggregation. Cisco is really
 the only other Router out there that is of Redback's caliber. We
 currently terminate close to 15,000 subscribers using a Redback SE 400.
 Attached is our current CPU usage.



 -Eric


 rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
  All
 
  I'm in the process of moving over to another upstream provider.  I'm
  working with them closely to get service to my county PUD system that
  uses pppoe tunnels for virtually  all end user connections.   ( I know
  that I can get a vlan, but the cost is prohibitive at the moment)
 
  So, I'm their first beta tester in my area and they have this used
  Redback router.  First there were problems that were to be solved with
  a firmware upgrade, now they have a hardware failure without a spare.
   I'm not familiar with this router at all, but discussed it with their
  sysadmin.
 
  Apparently the need is for something that can handle 2000 sessions and
  has full 100Mbps NICs and can support that speed. I'm not a pppoe
  expert, but would a decent PC, with 4/8GB of RAM and mikrotik SW
  installed handle something like this???  Butch?  or other MT experts?
   Or is this requirement way out of the MT league?
 
  For my own reasons, I want to get them going, promptly!  Any
  suggestions are greatly appreciated!!
 
  Marshall
  Rabbit Meadows Technology
 
 
 


  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 


 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

Re: [WISPA] Temporary Telescoping Mast

2008-02-01 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
We started to do this.  Ended up stopping as everyone wanted to be that 30
foot higher, but when you built a 60 foot attached tower or 100 foot guyed,
it got expensive and then they did'ent want it. 

Better purchase, bucket truck.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Valenti
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 12:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Temporary Telescoping Mast

I just picked myself up off the floor ... pricing came back on the  
HurryUp mast:  $1750 list.  (this is from one of the Michigan dealers)
It looks very nice, but that seems excessive.

I looked at these last year, anyone see problems with this:
http://www.tmastco.com/TelepolePage.htm

Pricing is shown on the webpage (I always like that), about $115.

I would just be trying to hold a Lucaya M1208 at the top. They seem  
to imply you can add 10' via another pole, for a total height of 38'.



On January 31, at 11:09 PM January 31, Mike Hammett wrote:

 I certainly have access to those, but I was looking get a 50 foot  
 mast and
 was hoping there was a good solution for at least 30'.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Test, Ignore

2008-01-09 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I was just setting up some mailing lists of my own!  lol.  I'm sure all 
will go well!

Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
www.linktechs.net



David E. Smith wrote:
 I'm in the middle of moving the WISPA mailing lists to a new (and bigger!) 
 server, and want to be sure I haven't broken anything too horribly. Pay no 
 attention to the man behind the curtain, et cetera.

 David Smith
 MVN.net



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I have known several people to use these and some have seen bandwidth 
savings.  MS updates is one of them.  Something to note, is that as 
George says, it can go both ways.  The key is to find out where people 
are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that. 


George Rogato wrote:

There is possibly additional costs involved.

Not sure if Marlon is paying by the bit or dedicated or 95%, but 
Akamai also uses your bandwidth to reach other customers close to you 
from the servers they place on your network.


I think if someone was colocated in Seattle, they could maybe just 
peer with them. One way to avoid some bandwidth costs.


Anthony Lemons wrote:
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost 
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just 
install it. More info can be found on their site:  
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html


Anthony

At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the 
cost for this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 
broadband subs, using two different networks.  I'm not sure of the 
cost benefit these days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates 
on PC's and servers during the same times (during school breaks) 
and the Akamai servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers 
get GREAT speeds doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, 
looking for opinions.


Thanks

George





 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Rackmount Mikrotik

2007-10-03 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Thanks for the vote there..   I do have Enterprise-Grade 1U RackMount
Mikoritks.  www.mikrotikrouter.com

Dennis


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:53 AM
To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rackmount Mikrotik

Contact Dennis Burgess.  I know he has a high end MT box.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Don Annas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Rackmount Mikrotik


 Has anyone found a good solid state rack-mount system for running 
 Mikrotik?
 In several areas, we are bottlenecked by the 532 boards and was looking 
 for
 something that would actually handle 100MB of throughput as well as a good
 amount of queues and VLANs.  Any pointers in the right direction are
 appreciated.  Thanks.





 ___
 Don Annas
 Triad Telecom, Inc.
 336.510.3800 x111
 336.510.3801 FAX
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HYPERLINK http://www.TriadTelecom.comwww.TriadTelecom.com
 HYPERLINK

https://msm.triadtelecom.com/NDDChat/Default.asp?url=http://www.triadteleco
 m.com/ndd/dannasCLICK to chat with me now!
 ___

 triadtel-login




 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.39/1045 - Release Date: 
 10/2/2007
 6:43 PM



 --
 This message was scanned and is believed to be clean.












 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at 
 ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Wimax World , anyone going?

2007-09-24 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Yep. I will be there


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 1:45 PM
To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax World , anyone going?

Im going to Chicago next week for Wimax World, anyone else going?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/