[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Scrap zpkg for Zope2 releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
I've now done the same work on a branch for that tree:
[/home/tseaver/projects/Zope-CVS/tseaver-retire_zpkg-2.10]
$ head .svn/entries
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
wc-entries
xmlns=svn:
entry
committed-rev=68857
name=
committed-date=2006-06-26T21:16:14.182239Z
url=svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg-2.10
last-author=tseaver
kind=dir
Btw, I found 'svn info' the other day. Before that I was looking at
.svn/entries, too.
Note that here I used the contents of 'zope.app' as installed by the
2.10b1 tarball, which has at least one of the packages in it ('wfmc')
which Philipp said should be excluded for 2.9.
AFAIK, both of these branches are ready for merging to their respective
branches (and to the trunk, for the 2.10 version).
Comments?
Looks good. Let's merge :)
I'm working on the merge right now, and having some problems:
$ export ZSVN=svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main
$ svn co $ZSVN/Zope/branches/2.9 Zope-2_9-branch
...
$ cd Zope-2_9-branch
$ svn merge -r 68803:HEAD $ZSVN/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg .
Dreleases/Zope2/DEPENDENCIES.cfg
Dreleases/Zope2/test.py
Dreleases/Zope2/PUBLICATION.cfg
Dreleases/Zope2/PACKAGE.cfg
Dreleases/Zope2/zopetest
Dreleases/Zope2/SETUP.cfg
Dreleases/Zope2
Dreleases/Zope2.map
Dreleases/Zope2.cfg
Dreleases
Performing status on external item at 'buildsupport/zpkgsetup'
Skipped 'buildsupport'
Uconfigure
Udoc/CHANGES.txt
U lib/python/Zope2
Ulib/python/Products/Transience/Transience.py
Ulib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ProgressHandler.py
Ulib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
Ulib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/DateIndex/DateIndex.py
Ulib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/TextIndex/TextIndex.py
Ulib/python/App/RefreshFuncs.py
Ulib/python/App/ProductContext.py
Ulib/python/OFS/Cache.py
Ulib/python/OFS/ObjectManager.py
Ulib/python/tempstorage/TemporaryStorage.py
Ulib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
svn: URL
'svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg/lib/python/zope/app'
doesn't match existing URL
'svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.1/src/zope/app' in
'lib/python/zope/app'
I may have to munge 'zope/app' manually and check it in to get the merge
done. Anybody have another suggestion?
Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEq9gh+gerLs4ltQ4RAlEKAJ49BdccSaBRoPtcbHlDGc+gLol2GwCdF6Eu
IT+gW5v9CNOrLPiNa9fWjxg=
=C6CD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
--On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? I am pretty sure that the complete Zope core is still full of those optimizations. -aj pgpnm0umtEDo2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
On 5 Jul 2006, at 19:05, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? I am pretty sure that the complete Zope core is still full of those optimizations. Does that mean you're for or against it? Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6472 Blamelist: andreasjung,efge BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
--On 5. Juli 2006 19:11:16 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5 Jul 2006, at 19:05, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? I am pretty sure that the complete Zope core is still full of those optimizations. Does that mean you're for or against it? For (of course) :-) -aj pgpQrpt9LJe13.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
Florent Guillaume wrote: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? I find these things rather confusing when looking at zope core code, and always wondered why they were there. In what sense are they optimisations? Tim ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Random SESSION variables disappearing
Tina Matter wrote at 2006-7-5 08:45 -0700: I noticed that someone else encountered this same problem back in February. However, the only response that person received was that this is not possible. Anyway, I am running into the same problem, where random session variables are disappearing. The session is still there because my error log indicates that the SESSION id and token are still set. However, many, and sometimes all of my other session variables disappear at random causing an error when trying to reference any of the objects. These are top level session variables? I.e. something you defined with SESSION.set(myvar, some_value)? And not variables inside some_value? One can easily believe that all variables disappear. That happens for example when the session times out. But it is very difficult to believe that individual session variables should disappear as all of them are treated in the same way: all or none should disappear... We might have an invalidation bug (although it is unlikely, as it should hit all storages and not only sessions) which might cause some connections to see an older state. In this case, the variable you loose should be your newest variables. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:21:29PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: | Does that mean you're for or against it? | | | For (of course) :-) It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most of the time faster than local lookups in recent versions of python. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
--On 5. Juli 2006 16:45:21 -0300 Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:21:29PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: | Does that mean you're for or against it? | | | For (of course) :-) It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most of the time faster than local lookups in recent versions of python. I am *for* removing them. These culprits must go. -aj pgpeyj44eLSBa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 16:45 -0300:
...
It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most
of the time faster than local lookups in recent versions of python.
That would extremely surprise me:
While global lookup was significantly optimized,
it is still an lookup with a string as argument.
For local lookup on the other hand, the compiler has
turned the name into an index and at runtime, an
indexed access it made. That is still faster.
An a simple test shows that I am right:
i = 1
def f1(): # using global i directly
... x=0
... for k in xrange(100): x += i
...
def f2(): # using global i via local _i
... x=0; _i=i
... for k in xrange(100): x += _i
...
from timeit import Timer
t=Timer('__main__.f1()', 'import __main__')
t.timeit()
33.647971153259277
t=Timer('__main__.f2()', 'import __main__')
t.timeit()
28.818410873413086
I have seen timings which might be misinterpreted in the way
you described above:
def f(..., opt1=glob1):
...
can be slower than directly using glob1.
The reason in this case is that handling optional arguments
costs something which might eat the savings due to local access.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
--
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2006-7-5 18:56 +0200: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? Why do you think they were stupid? They do save time -- although it probably does not dominate the total time. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:29:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | That would extremely surprise me: | | While global lookup was significantly optimized, | it is still an lookup with a string as argument. | | For local lookup on the other hand, the compiler has | turned the name into an index and at runtime, an | indexed access it made. That is still faster. Hum. Hum. Wonder where my brain is. I wish I could find the email with the benchmarks to make me look less silly. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
...and then I find it. Phew :) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925 -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Scrap zpkg for Zope2 releases
Tres Seaver wrote: svn: URL 'svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg/lib/python/zope/app' doesn't match existing URL 'svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.1/src/zope/app' in 'lib/python/zope/app' I may have to munge 'zope/app' manually and check it in to get the merge done. Anybody have another suggestion? When replacing a subversioned directory with an external, you first need to remove the directory and commit it. Then, in a next revision, you add the external. Philipp ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 18:06 -0300: ...and then I find it. Phew :) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925 But you see that this post does not compare local versus global access but cell reference in enclosing (!) scope versus global access. As my example proves, local access (i.e. cell reference in local scope) *IS* faster than global access. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6480 Blamelist: efge,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6482 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Serious security problem with Zope 2
We have recently discovered that there are (still) very serious security problems with the integration of reStructured Text (docutils) into Zope 2. We have prepared a hot fix for this problem: http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/Hotfix-20060705/ See: http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/Hotfix-20060705/ README.txt for installation instructions. It is important to install this hotfix as soon as possible. This fix will disable the reStructuredText 'raw' directive. Much thanks goes to Tres Seaver for analyzing the problem and developing the hotfix! Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] local namespace optimizations?
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:30:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 18:06 -0300: | ...and then I find it. Phew :) | | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925 | | But you see that this post does not compare local versus global | access but cell reference in enclosing (!) scope versus global access. | | As my example proves, local access (i.e. cell reference in local scope) | *IS* faster than global access. Yup Yup. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: local namespace optimizations?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote at 2006-7-5 18:56 +0200: Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid: _getattr = getattr _none = None marker = _marker local namespace optimizations that are found in unrestrictedTraverse? Why do you think they were stupid? I call them stupid because they are micro-optimizations that are drowned in the rest of the traversal code and make things harder to read. _none vs None are exactly the same speed in my tests. _marker vs a global have a 0.05 microsecond difference on my machine _getattr vs getattr too. And if we localize those, why not localize aq_base as well, and guarded_getattr and securityManager.validate and nsParse and namespaceLookup... At least the current unrestrictedTraverse() code has grown sufficiently complex that it should be rebenched and re-optimize if needed, but it's already complex enough to not keep cruft in it if it's not justified. Florent They do save time -- although it probably does not dominate the total time. -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Scrap zpkg for Zope2 releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: svn: URL 'svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg/lib/python/zope/app' doesn't match existing URL 'svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.1/src/zope/app' in 'lib/python/zope/app' I may have to munge 'zope/app' manually and check it in to get the merge done. Anybody have another suggestion? When replacing a subversioned directory with an external, you first need to remove the directory and commit it. Then, in a next revision, you add the external. I'm actually going the other direction, but I think I still need two transactions (first remove the external, then create and add tne directory) Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErHJv+gerLs4ltQ4RAq24AKC1aNL4mSW7UO71KnwXgT8U/ZYtbACeLUGz 4cMFJMBosBpvuiuB9qFhwZ8= =3uV7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6486 Blamelist: efge,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6488 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6490 Blamelist: efge,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6491 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Scrap zpkg for Zope2 releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: svn: URL 'svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tseaver-retire_zpkg/lib/python/zope/app' doesn't match existing URL 'svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/tags/Zope-3.2.1/src/zope/app' in 'lib/python/zope/app' I may have to munge 'zope/app' manually and check it in to get the merge done. Anybody have another suggestion? When replacing a subversioned directory with an external, you first need to remove the directory and commit it. Then, in a next revision, you add the external. I'm actually going the other direction, but I think I still need two transactions (first remove the external, then create and add tne directory) OK, I have merged the 'tseaver-retire_zpkg_branch' to the 2.9 branch, and the 'tseaver-zpkg_retire-2.10' branch to the 2.10 branch and the trunk. Because of the surgery involved in switching 'lib/python/zope/app' from an svn:external to a real directlry, your existing sandboxen may neeed some help in completing an 'svn up' (try removing the app directory, if it barfs there). Note that I did *not* repair the test failure which showed up on the 2.10 branch / trunk while I was in the middle of the merge -- it looks as though it might be related to the traversal changes Florent made today, and the failure is the same on the 2.10 branch / trunk *without* the merge as *with* it. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFErI5h+gerLs4ltQ4RAiMeAJwMcaKkQRt7/V4kf2aoKL6wBjrTpgCYgVHd fzEB9F5epsoQ83iUE/PR3w== =UfN3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6490 Blamelist: efge,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6492 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6492 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
