Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.traversing/trunk/ zcml now only depends on zope.component meta, not zope.app.component

2009-04-29 Thread Christian Theune
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:59 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:01:36AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
  On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 01:37 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
   Incidentally, I've a long-standing wish to be able to register browser
   views in ZCML using the adapter directive.
   
   class MyFineView(BrowserPage):
   adapts(IMyContentObject, IBrowserRequest)
   
   template = ViewPageTemplateFile('my_fine_view.pt')
   
   def __call__(self):
   # update form or whatever
   return self.template()
   
   adapter name=my_fine_view.html factory=.mod.MyFineView /
   
   Maybe something to look for in Zope 4?
  
  How about recording this wish on launchpad?
 
 Sure, go ahead and do it!

Did I miss this thing belonging to April Fool's?

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK

2009-04-29 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Apr 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 20:51:05 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011579.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 20:53:07 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011580.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 20:55:07 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011581.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 20:57:08 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011582.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 20:59:14 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011583.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 21:01:15 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011584.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 21:03:16 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011585.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 28 21:05:16 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011586.html

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: set __parent__ and __name__ in Zope 2.12 OFS

2009-04-29 Thread Chris Withers
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 Chris Withers wrote:
 I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to 
 see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.
 
 Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
 based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.

My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it 
egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.

I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it 
is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something 
which has no defined end point.

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: set __parent__ and __name__ in Zope 2.12 OFS

2009-04-29 Thread Andreas Jung
On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
 Hanno Schlichting wrote:
   
 Chris Withers wrote:
 
 I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to 
 see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.
   
 Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
 based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.
 
 My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it 
 egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.

 I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
 There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it 
 is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something 
 which has no defined end point.
I strongly object  inflationary  Zope 2 releases.

Andreas

begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd.  Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: set __parent__ and __name__ in Zope 2.12 OFS

2009-04-29 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:09, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
 On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
 Hanno Schlichting wrote:

 Chris Withers wrote:

 I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to
 see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.

 Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
 based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.

 My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it
 egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.

 I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
 There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it
 is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something
 which has no defined end point.
 I strongly object  inflationary  Zope 2 releases.

Well, this isn't inflationary, is it? 2.12 is eggified. That deserves
a new version number.
If we then after that start changing how acquisition work, that also
needs a new version number.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: set __parent__ and __name__ in Zope 2.12 OFS

2009-04-29 Thread Andreas Jung
On 29.04.2009 16:51 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:09, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
   
 On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
 
 Hanno Schlichting wrote:

   
 Chris Withers wrote:

 
 I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to
 see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.

   
 Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
 based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.

 
 My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it
 egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.

 I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
 There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it
 is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something
 which has no defined end point.
   
 I strongly object  inflationary  Zope 2 releases.
 
 Well, this isn't inflationary, is it? 2.12 is eggified. That deserves
 a new version number.
 If we then after that start changing how acquisition work, that also
 needs a new version number.
   
We would have to maintain four different major release of Zope:
2.10, 2.11, 2.12 and 2.13. Support for 2.10 can't be dropped
since it is the requirement for Plone 3.X. A new major Zope 2.13 can be
addressed
when there are enough valuable features and changes that satisfy a new
release.

Andreas

-- 
ZOPYX Ltd.  Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK

E-Publishing, Python, Zope  Plone development, Consulting


begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd.  Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )