Re: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-09 Thread J.T.
Which brings me to a question regarding edits. Now this may not be familiar to those not intimated with edit culture, but there is/was a kind of code among the edit heads that: eww you got intimated with edit culture? gross man! 2] dope tracks that have a spoiler section or are hard to mix (so

RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-09 Thread Hardie, Nick
i think i mean angel in my pocket...what's the one that has that sick kinda sinister italo-y lead near the beginning, before breaking into discocheeze? i'm away from home. sounds about right

Re: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-09 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: J.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] it depends on how much you chop it! and soup-up the beats? sometimes even if its not as good as the original, it's kinda nice just having a different arrangement, or some thumpier beats...even tho in the

RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-09 Thread Stoddard, Kamal
. Kamal K. Stoddard Turner Broadcasting Systems -Original Message- From: J.T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:34 AM To: Stoddard, Kamal; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP) Which

Re: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-08 Thread David Easy
From: Stoddard, Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you all feel most of the edits out now are done from a need or intention to make them groove into the cosmos or just to have done it? The latter! £ $$$ With a few exceptions of course.

Re: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-08 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: Stoddard, Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nowadays it seems people don't think as much about whether a track needs an edit (or what kind of editing) as much as they think about how many people will buy the edit (theo excluded...but

RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-08 Thread Stoddard, Kamal
Yeah dawg the edit of dazz on the mike clark gets me (and everyone else in earshot) every time. That 12 is a perfect example of editing to fit the need. And in my book if you add anything (organs) that weren't in the original, it's not an edit. Krivit used to do good ones, but I think it's the

RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-08 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: Stoddard, Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yeah dawg the edit of dazz on the mike clark gets me (and everyone else in earshot) every time. That 12 is a perfect example of editing to fit the need. yeah ive been bringing it out again the

RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP)

2005-06-08 Thread Stoddard, Kamal
K. Stoddard Turner Broadcasting Systems -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:29 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP) -- Original Message