Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
With many positive responses in the mailing list on adoption call and the comments from BT-SIG on this draft, The draft-gomez-6lo-blemish is now a WG document! Carles, please submit the document as WG -00 document after the IETF. Cheers, -6lo-chairs From: samita Chakrabarti [mailto:samitac.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 10:48 AM To: 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org> Subject: Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with 'Yes/No' and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
Hi, I support the adoption of this document. Thanks, Ines. > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti < > samitac.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello All: > > > > We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were > interests in the WG to work on this draft. > > The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG > has been consulted. > > > > We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ > > > > > > Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’ and a short > note. > > > > The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. > > > > Thanks, > > Gabriel & Samita > > 6lo-chairs > > > ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
I support adoption of this document. From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yong-Geun Hong Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:22 PM To: samita Chakrabarti Cc: lo <6lo@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello All.. I support the adoption of this document. We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer technologies but it is more better to explore network topology. In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology. I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use cases. Best regards. YongGeun. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti mailto:samitac.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’ and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
Hi all, I did not recognize blemesh for what it is. This document is interesting because BT in general has a large industrial support. It is very important that this document is written in collaboration with the BT sig. Learning that this is indeed the case, I support the adoption of this document fully. Peter Yong-Geun Hong schreef op 2016-10-06 04:21: Hello All.. I support the adoption of this document. We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer technologies but it is more better to explore network topology. In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology. I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use cases. Best regards. YongGeun. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti wrote: Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ [1] Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’ and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo [2] Links: -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ [2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
Hello All.. I support the adoption of this document. We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer technologies but it is more better to explore network topology. In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology. I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use cases. Best regards. YongGeun. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti wrote: > > > Hello All: > > > > We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were > interests in the WG to work on this draft. > > The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG > has been consulted. > > > > We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ > > > > > > Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’ and a short > note. > > > > The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. > > > > Thanks, > > Gabriel & Samita > > 6lo-chairs > > ___ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > > ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
Hi Pascal, Once we adopt the document and discuss changes in the document by WG, the relevant contributions should be added as a natural process. If you have any particular ideas or anyone you think would be relevant to comment on, please let us know. I am not clear on "many areas" you referred below. Did you mean that the draft should collect input from detnet WG or any other group? Ultimately, we would like BT vendors to adopt the IETF protocol and for that it'd be wise to work closely with BTSIG as you would agree. Thanks, -Samita From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [mailto:pthub...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:09 AM To: samita Chakrabarti ; 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello Samita: This is a good start and the similar effort at detnet is a success. But it will take multiple (many) contributors from many areas to make it real good. Do we have them? Cheers, Pascal From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of samita Chakrabarti Sent: mercredi 21 septembre 2016 19:48 To: 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org <mailto:6lo@ietf.org> > Subject: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with 'Yes/No' and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
Hello Samita: This is a good start and the similar effort at detnet is a success. But it will take multiple (many) contributors from many areas to make it real good. Do we have them? Cheers, Pascal From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of samita Chakrabarti Sent: mercredi 21 septembre 2016 19:48 To: 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org> Subject: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh Hello All: We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were interests in the WG to work on this draft. The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG has been consulted. We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with 'Yes/No' and a short note. The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016. Thanks, Gabriel & Samita 6lo-chairs ___ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
