http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 13:19 ---
A linux-2.6.24-rc5 is patches and currently compiles.
Was it the right choice ? or should I go back to rc4 ?
any instructions ?, esp. to configure the kernel by deselecting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #63 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 14:53 ---
this is after a make install (maybe I disabeld to much, but the box is
running as usual):
sh /opt/prog/kernel/linux-2.6.24-rc5/arch/x86/boot/install.sh 2.6.24-rc5
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #64 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 17:42 ---
Yannick, yeah, it seems somehow wodim uses too short timeout value. Dunno why
it works in 2.6.23 tho. Ronald, full blanking takes a lot of time. Yours
seems fine now. I'll
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #65 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 18:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13987)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13987action=view)
bug9346-dbg2.patch
Please apply this patch on top of -rc5 and see whether
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #67 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:10 ---
okay, a new kernel, patched on a clean rc5 with your last patch.
now I get by blanking/writing no logs, but this lines:
wodim: Operation not permitted. Warning: Cannot raise
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #68 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:44 ---
You can ignore the RLIMIT warning. It will go away if you run it as root but
you won't really need it. And, yes, yours works fine with or without the
timeout fix patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #69 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 23:27 ---
Good to know. Thanks ! and Happy hacking (as a developer I currently can't
recall his name (Canada, French, WLAN ? ...) used to greet/end in his mails)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 00:28 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
How long does full erase take? I'm
thinking the problem is caused by k3b not setting enough timeout. The blank
is
non-data command and there
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 05:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=13944)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13944action=view)
bug9346-blank-tout-debug.patch
Can you please apply the attached patch to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 10:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=13945)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13945action=view)
kernel.log.gz bug9346-dbg2.patch + bug9346-blank-tout-debug.patch
yep :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 18:40 ---
(In reply to comment #54)
1. How long does full blanking take on working setup? You were using the the
same program and driver, right?
kind of weird : it last 45 mn (auto
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 19:33 ---
I wonder what makes timeouts differ between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rcX but dbg2
seems to fix all the ATAPI PIO data transfer issues. I'll look into it.
Ronald, the command is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 02:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=13920)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13920action=view)
bug9346-dbg1.patch
That ping was for me, I think. I still can't tell why
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 03:58 ---
here it is, after applying the patch (with some rejects)
and compiling the kernel
k3b start fast but during erase error:
System
---
K3b Version: 1.0.3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 07:24 ---
Hmmm... The patch is supposed to apply cleanly on -rc4. Maybe I screwed up
somewhere. Nope, it applies fine here. Anyways, the last patch was basically
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 08:30 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
Hmmm... The patch is supposed to apply cleanly on -rc4. Maybe I screwed up
somewhere. Nope, it applies fine here. Anyways, the last patch was
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 08:36 ---
Please post the log and repeat the test with bug9346-dbg.patch. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 08:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=13923)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13923action=view)
bug9346-dbg1.patch kernel.log.gz
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 09:06 ---
too fast ;-) ,unfortunately i have bad news
full erase bug
see the new kernel.log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 09:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13925)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13925action=view)
fast erase + burn + full erase
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13925|fast erase + burn + full|kernel.log.gz fast erase +
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 09:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=13924)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13924action=view)
bug9346-dbg2.patch
Also, does this patch work on top of clean 2.6.24-rc4?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 10:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=13926)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13926action=view)
kernel.log.gz bug9346-dbg2.patch
rc4 with bug9346-dbg2.patch :
burn ok,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 13:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=13929)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13929action=view)
kernel.log.gz bug9346-dbg.patch
with this one
burn fail
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13925|kernel.log.gz fast erase + |kernel.log.gz bug9346-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 22:20 ---
Okay, so, to recap.
Everything except for full erase works fine with improve-ATAPI-data-xfer branch
(or dbg1) and dbg2. On dbg1, burn fails. Right?
I think now I know
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 22:34 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
Okay, so, to recap.
Everything except for full erase works fine with improve-ATAPI-data-xfer
branch
(or dbg1) and dbg2. On dbg1, burn fails.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 22:56 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
(In reply to comment #45)
Okay, so, to recap.
Everything except for full erase works fine with improve-ATAPI-data-xfer
branch
(or dbg1)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 23:30 ---
i tried the full erase on 2.6.22-14-generic (it's ubuntu gutsy kernel)
and uses libata and ata_piix
i know not good but have to go to work soon.
It works, if you want i'll test
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-09 23:46 ---
Yannick, thanks a lot for all the testing. How long does full erase take? I'm
thinking the problem is caused by k3b not setting enough timeout. The blank is
non-data command
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-07 17:24 ---
Ping?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-07 18:53 ---
here am i ;-)
In Britanny, France, we say :
No News, Good News !
But unfortunately this isn't the case:
Syslog with latest git pull (rc4*) unpatched at k3b start:
Dec 8
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-03 11:38 ---
last git pull unpatched :
Dec 3 20:30:08 localhost kernel: ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr
0x0 action 0x2 frozen
Dec 3 20:30:08 localhost kernel: ata5.00: cmd
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-03 20:42 ---
Strange, it applies fine on today's git #master.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/os/linux-2.6 git-cat-file commit HEAD
tree 78e6687f31a1ee2d61f879d8aa335361e3f8b66c
parent
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-03 22:02 ---
ok clean tree + atapi-pio-debug.patch
k3b launch syslog:
Dec 4 06:54:22 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ATAPI_XFER: nbytes=96 requested=26
transferred=26 curbytes=26 no_more_sg=0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13805|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-30 09:09 ---
hum
on top of linus master git branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/kernel/linux$ patch -p1 ../atapi-pio-debug.patch
patching file drivers/ata/libata-core.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 07:02 ---
Hmmm... weird. I can't reproduce your problem here. Can you hook your dvd
driver to SATA controller w/ SFF interface - for example, ata_piix or sata_sil?
I wanna see how the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 13:31 ---
Hello TJ,
Just to state the obvious.
There are two of us with this problem, and what is common in both
situations is we have the exact same DVD burner with exactly the same
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 15:59 ---
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too and I wanna find out how the device behaves.
AHCI interface implements PIO HSM in hardware and I can't tell much about
what's going on. SFF
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 19:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13805)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13805action=view)
atapi-pio-debug.patch
Here you go.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 18:42 ---
Yannick, please post the result of lspci -nn and kernel boot log. I'll post
a patch soon.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 19:35 ---
Ah.. okay, the device is PATA. You can leave SATA part in ahci mode then. It
doesn't matter. I thought the drive was connected to SATA port for some reason
- ah okay someone
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 19:14 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Created an attachment (id=13805)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13805action=view) [details]
atapi-pio-debug.patch
Here you go.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 18:27 ---
ah ok, i can disable ahci in bios and i did
$ lsmod | grep ata_piix
ata_piix 14468 6
Now ready to test your patch
(even if the problem is specific to the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-29 19:08 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Yannick, please post the result of lspci -nn and kernel boot log. I'll post
a patch soon.
here it is :
~$ lspci -nn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 00:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13775)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13775action=view)
atapi-drain.patch
Does this fix the problem?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 04:32 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created an attachment (id=13775)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13775action=view) [details]
atapi-drain.patch
Does this fix the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 06:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=13779)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13779action=view)
improve-eh-reporting.patch
Ah.. okay, so that wasn't enough. Can you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 07:23 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Created an attachment (id=13779)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13779action=view) [details]
improve-eh-reporting.patch
Ah..
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 17:18 ---
Thanks, can you please give a shot at the following git tree? If you can't, I
can provide a tarball. Just lemme know.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 17:18 ---
Eh... bugzilla broke the line improve-ATAPI-data-transfer part is the branch.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 18:00 ---
Hello TJ,
Exactly how do I checkout the source ?
I can get the main one with
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git
But when I do
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 18:38 ---
Hmmm... it should have brought it. You can fetch and checkout the branch by...
$ git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 21:24 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Hmmm... it should have brought it. You can fetch and checkout the branch
by...
$ git fetch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-22 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I tried passing acpi=off in grub, it didn't make a difference. Interrupts also
looked to be the same.
I mistakenly said I could access the drive at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-19 23:14 ---
The ACPI interrupt routing on this board is simple.
in IOAPIC mode, all the wires are hard-coded.
So if we're getting the wrong IRQ for the device, then
it means we'd have to be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 12:11 ---
Note that I've got several other reports for different controllers variously
reporting no IDE IRQ being delivered or no IDE IRQ being available, all
starting with 2.6.24-rc (and
67 matches
Mail list logo
