Yann,
Create a child DNS domain for the site containing DCb, and establish DCb as the
authoritative server for that domain. If you have resources in Sitea you'll
then need to ensure there is a forwarder set up for resolution, etc. Remember
that separate DNS domains can exist within the one
Molkentin, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Yann,
Create a child DNS domain for the site containing DCb, and
establish DCb as the authoritative server for that domain. If you have
resources in Sitea you'll then need to ensure there is a forwarder set
Steve,
A little of column A and a little of column B.
DFSR is what you'd use if you were running R2. DFS is standard to
Win2K3, and uses FRS to do the replication (if used). Don't be afraid -
it's easier than FRS alone... although, I can tell you that you'd be
1000% better off replicating using
] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:56 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
James,
This may sound harsh, but it could be. Humour us all and try
deleting the
root and rebuilding it and let us know...
themolk
James,
Any specific event log entries around then?
Do you have a big forest? How recently was the root setup (i.e. had it
had time to replicate this information everywhere)?
I'm interested by the phrase look correct - what do you mean?
Just so I have it right in my head - you are trying to
correct I mean that DA/EA have full rights on the
DFS attributes
in the domain.
You are correct, R1 and existing DFS root.
Thanks for the reply,
-James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10
] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
James,
I may not be able to help, but I hope at least I don't confuse things.
Does your DA/EA account have both share and NTFS permissions
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
James,
I may not be able to help, but I hope at least I don't confuse things.
Does your DA/EA
Architecture and Engineering
The Kroger Co.
Office: (859) 363-2346
Cell:(859) 653-8644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
) 653-8644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
James,
Where is the link located that you
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:54 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
James...
and one more thing - it might have something to do
Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS Access Denied Error
So let me get this straight...
You have a root with folders like this:
RootFolder
--Folder1
--Folder2
You've published the RootFolder
and Engineering
The Kroger Co.
Office: (859) 363-2346
Cell:(859) 653-8644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Molkentin, Steve
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:22 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DFS
] On Behalf Of Molkentin,
Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:35 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DFS-R Issue - 2nd try
Steve,
I'll weigh in - I'm no DFSR legend, but I like to think I am learning
more about it every day, and things like this only help me
Todd,
It really comes down to what you want to achieve with your Domain-based
DFS root and standalone DFS root. Now that I've stated the obvious -
organising your data in a logical fashion can have far reaching
implications (good and bad) for your staff, but I'm all for making it
easier for them
Steve,
I'll weigh in - I'm no DFSR legend, but I like to think I am learning
more about it every day, and things like this only help me learn more...
You say you have no replication of your DFS topology, except for one
folder - what is the replication topology (you know, full mesh, etc)?
What
Dear whoever you are,
It's going to depend on the size and scope of your domain - how many
DC's, how often replication is set to occur, link speed, etc, etc.
What you say sounds plausible, but what of these other environmental
factors?
themolk.
I find not using mine gives me almost unlimited hours use.
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jackson Shaw
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2006 1:57 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
I'll see that and raise you...
The company I work for makes door furniture, padlocks, etc.
We have a competitor in the retail market that has been buying our stock
from our customers to gain shelf space in their stores. Now, while we
still get the sale, and the stock does initially go on the
Neil, All,
It doesn't benefit us, that's for sure! ;)
Daylight saving is great, it's just that we here in Queensland aren't
allowed to have it yet (that makes it hard dealing with the other east
coast states, let me tell you, and turns a 2 hour difference between us
and NZ into 3 hours,
Absolutely - somebody send me to Floreda (Oh Homer, you so crazy...)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent: Friday, 20 October 2006 8:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: TechED
Ravi,
Was it ever working? What version of ActiveSync are you using, and what
of the devices (what OS)?
The reason I ask is that we have an issue with ActiveSync v4.2 and Trend
OfficeScan where they DO NOT play together with Windows Mobile 5.0
devices. No fix from Trend until later next year!!!
Steve,
Happy to pick up the hijack...
Bad news - upgrading to R2 introduces DFSR and the "new"
DFS as a whole new ball game. Old and existing DFS/FRS roots will continue as
they are. If you wish them to use the new system, the old one should be deleted
and created using the new DFS
Additionally.. there are many catches with DFS when you
start replicating files (if you were intending to). As a (R1 speak) root link,
it is pretty simple, however you have to ensure you have your NTFS and share
permissions set correctly before you create the DFS root and additional links or
Simple - give the user their old computer back. ;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Thursday, 22 June 2006 3:40 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Drive Map Issue
If worked
Neil,
That's a great idea - the same one we use here.
Instead then of the 'SOE' thought that is usual, we call it our 'SAL' -
standard application load. The machine is built as an OS, patches and
SP's (out of the box), and WSUS looks after all that after the fact, our
SAL is (in our case) GPO
, view it with no issues on the root target server.
If I try to
view it on one of the 'receiving' DFS targets, it comes up OK.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Molkentin,
Steve
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:30 PM
To: ActiveDir
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Molkentin,
Steve
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:35 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FRS/DFS woes
Russ,
Possibly - what are the permissions of the 3 folders you are trying
Russ,
Possibly - what are the permissions of the 3 folders you are trying to
replicate around? Are they identical? Check the share permissions as
well as the folder permissions. Can each machine resolve the FQDN of
each of the other two machines from it? I'm making the assumption that
all 3
What a shame, Tony... his posts were so insightful...
;)
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
MurraySent: Wednesday, 14 June 2006 7:02 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] UserName
All,
This may seem pretty straight forward, but I haven't been able to track
down any definitive info anywhere, not even from Microsoft.
We are looking at connecting a number of businesses within our region
(Asia Pacific) to the same domain. No stress there - most of the DC's
(where they exist)
Title: Virtual DCs
Ada,
I am intrigued as to why "management" are directing you to
do this. What benefits do they percieve? Do they understand the nature of the
2K3 directory and the load 7,000 users puts on it?
This is not a criticism - just a curious thinking out loud
moment...
Never miss a chance, do you Susan? ;)
For those interested, I am in China at the moment, doing a meet and
greet/reccy on our sister companies there and preparing for connecting
them to our regional domain - then our region will be migrated to the
corporate global domain as a part of the
Jerry,
I think without the trusts and using ADMT, you are going to be pushing
it up a hill as far as the easy portion of this goes. Good luck and
let us know what you end up doing...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neil asked...
I'm looking to implement one or more lag sites, with
staggered replication schedules. (i.e. NYC lag replicates
tues and thurs, 2-4 am; LON lag replicates mon, wed and fri 2-4 am).
We're concerned that admins can still force replication
outside of these hours using
sarcasm
_SO) glad I know this... It means that I can sleep tonight now...
/sarcasm
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 9:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
Copy that on SMS2003 - we rolled it out last year and it spanks all over
v2.0
Also agreed that it is only as good as the effort you put in, and that
said we put in a bit and were able to remotely manage/report on all our
clients at the drop of a hat (once the client was rolled out, which in
Diane,
ALWAYS double down. ;)
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers,
DianeSent: Thursday, 30 March 2006 6:23 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quiet? DEC?
Related?
Maybe we should ask a question on
Interesting... an employee of Texas Christian University
giving gambling advice...
Next you'll be offering advice on (ahem) "adult"
situations...
;)
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas,
BryanSent: Thursday, 30 March 2006 6:41 AMTo:
"Required" is such a strong and inflammatory word... so is
"monitor" (if you talk to the right people)...
We use Trend here, however, I've always loved (previous
jobs) WebMarshal/MailMarshal from NetIQ.
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I always find locking the server in a box with the network
cable pulled out makes it most secure (as long as I don't lose my
keys)...
;)
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
EdwinSent: Sunday, 5 March 2006 1:17 PMTo:
As a wise man continues to say...
"There are seldom good technological solutions to
behavioural problems"
;) Enjoy...
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
AbagnaleSent: Saturday, 4 February 2006 8:28 AMTo:
I too am a fan of local profile, but I do not think that
directly addresses Frank's issues...
A couple of jobs ago at a school we used roaming profiles
exclusively - made sense in our scenario. There was still at least 3-4 staff on
a bad day that needed their profile reconfig-ed (all
Title: distributing large service pack files
Mark,
WSUS (and SMS for that matter) uses the "Background
Intelligent Transfer Service" (that's what it's called) to do just this on large
files, in that it is smart enough to recognise downtime on your network to send
files, and manages the
Just to clarify though, if you connect to the console using
RDP, it locks out the user at the other end, so they can't do anything or even
watch... you can then disconnect, but it leaves the machine
locked.
Just to add to the mix...
We use RDP for our servers and DameWare for our clients
Susan, that's definitely a mental image to have to shake... ;)
Steve - I may be off track here, but I thought that when WSUS installed
something, it meant that you COULDN'T open things... It may download in
the background while people are using the machine, but not install until
agreed time
So, this year, due to normal adjustments in keeping our calendar in
sync with the moon (and no doubt the sun too), 2005 will exist for an
extra second this year.
See: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8476418/
The clocks will read 11:59:60 before ticking over to 12:00:00
So... How will that affect us? If
Susan, you may be the annoying SBSer around here - your comments are
often the clear reminder of the limitations of some of our customers,
and the things we can and need to do to make their IT world exist...
Using SBS or not.
While there are a lot of best practice benfits and processes, how many
Harald,
Am I reading this right, that you changed the MAC addresses on both
NIC's (swapped 'em) or just changed the TCP/IP settings?
Also to clarify, the server is resolving the internal IP via DNS
correctly, and you can access the box via the internet on the external
IP... But internally you
] Server Disappeared
Molkentin, Steve burped the following on 24/11/2005 1:00 PM:
Harald,
Am I reading this right, that you changed the MAC addresses on both
NIC's (swapped 'em) or just changed the TCP/IP settings?
Yes, I switched the cables to the NICs, and then reversed the
TCP
Ask the manager if he'd like to turn his pc into a DC, complete with the
limitations therein, and see if he likes it! ;)
The view is always better from the cheaper seats...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Susan Bradley,
Michael,
I was about to offer the same solution as James - it has
worked for us!
themolk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair,
JamesSent: Friday, 18 November 2005 12:48 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Internet
Don't the Department of Defence recommend that a bullet through the hard
drive is the only way to ensure the data cannot be compromised after the
fact (or was that the FBI)?
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Crowley
Rick added, to Ed:
Who ARE you, anyway?
See, this thread has just got REAL interesting...
[takes out chips and coke, settles back into recliner chair to take in
the show that may begin]
Personalising posts makes technical lists just that more enjoyable.
themolk.
-Original
Gee Tom - I am not sure you can add enough zero's to the
end of the number you create...
Try thinking of a number, halve it (opportunity), multiply
it by 3.2 (business), subtract the number you fist thought of (size) and then
add 20% (location).
Any help?
themolk. ;)
From: [EMAIL
55 matches
Mail list logo
