Re: tcpwindowsize

2000-10-17 Thread Gyula Bereczky
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Pieter Groen wrote: Some of my clients get this message: 16.10.2000 16:30:21 TcpOpen(): Warning. The TCP window size defined to ADSM is not supported by your system. It will be to set default size - 131070 What does it mean and what can I do

FW: Do you want to receive my Out-Of-Office Autoreply?

2000-10-17 Thread Warren, Matthew James
Hello *sm'ers I'm not moaning, but someone sent this to a different listserv I read, and I think its a good idea -Original Message- Sent: 17 October 2000 07:26:AM Subject: Do you want to receive my Out-Of-Office Autoreply? No! Of course you don't. And I don't want yours either.

DDS3 read DDS2 tape?

2000-10-17 Thread Orin Rehorst
Dumb question, I know, but I must ask. A DDS2 tape cannot be read by a DDS3 tape unit, correct? Thanks, Orin Rehorst

AW: DDS3 read DDS2 tape?

2000-10-17 Thread Timo Kilchenmann
Wrong. It can! Eurodis Schweiz AG Data Division Timo Kilchenmann Systems Engineer --- Timo Kilchenmann E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eurodis Schweiz AG Phone +41 1 843 34 91 (direct) Bahnstrasse 58/60or +41 1 843 32 32 CH-8105

Re: tcpwindowsize

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
Some of my clients get this message: 16.10.2000 16:30:21 TcpOpen(): Warning. The TCP window size defined to ADSM is not supported by your system. It will be to set default size - 131070 What does it mean and what can I do about it? Changing the value of TCPWINDOWSIZE in DSM.SYS has

Is DRM provided on the TSM 4.1 CD ?

2000-10-17 Thread Holk, R v
Hi, I wonder if the drm product is still on the TSM cd , and if it still can be enabled thru a license, which was the case with adsm. The tivoli web-site give me the impression that DRM is now a seperate product. We are planning for an upgrade of our adsm 3.1.2 to tsm 4.1 on which we use DRM ,

Re: Is DRM provided on the TSM 4.1 CD ?

2000-10-17 Thread Remeta, Mark
Hi Ron, yes DRM is on the 4.1 CD and it is enabled by a license. I just upgraded from 3.1.2.40 to 4.1.1.0 so I know... Mark -Original Message- From: Holk, R v [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is DRM provided on the TSM

Re: AW: DDS3 read DDS2 tape?

2000-10-17 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
what is the difference between DDS3 and DDS2 tapes? i know one is capacity .. what else ? "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 10/17/2000 07:38:17 AM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400 cc: Subject: AW:

Re: Adsm scheduler on cluster node backing up cluster drives after reboot

2000-10-17 Thread Bill Smoldt
Well, to correct it, you might start the scheduler for each node as a cluster service that never fails over to the other node. That way, the service won't start up until that cluster node is up and it will only see the drives that you have assigned to the node. Bill SmoldtSSSI Storage

Volinformation Restore

2000-10-17 Thread Robert Ouzen
Dear Users I need just to restore the volinfornation of a volume on a client Novell. My question is if I run: restore servername\servervolume: -subdir=yes -vol -replace=yes -q I will restore just the volinformation I don't need the data . T.I.A Robert

Re: 3.7 TO 4.1 UPGRADE

2000-10-17 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
I am going through same process , best way is to intsall TSm on testing machine , other than working one . Install tsm 3.7 , and then restore databse of 3.7 , after that Intsall 4.1 .if your library have sufficient drives define some of them to new system and you are ready to go.. test time

Re: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
I'm resending this in the hopes someone has a quick answer If I backup all the files on a client, and then later decide to implement an exclude.dir, what happens to the files that were previously backed up? Do they get purged or do they stay forever pinned in ADSM? Bob - Doing an

3.1.2.40 to 4.1.1.0 - was RE: Is DRM provided on the TSM 4.1 CD ?

2000-10-17 Thread Talafous, John G.
Remeta, Mark wrote: I just upgraded from 3.1.2.40 to 4.1.1.0 so I know... I have an OS390 running ADSM 3.1.2.40. I have the 4.1.0.0 tape for installation and am getting ready to go. It sounds like I first want to see about getting whatever is necessary to move to 4.1.1.0 instead of 4.1.0.0.

Re: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Serge Gaudet/EIG
The files previously backed-up stay pinned in *SM. "Forever" is a long time though. How long they are maintained in *SM will depend on the effective policy(ies) for each files (ie. review your versions data exists, versions data deleted, and retain extra versions parameters). Up to two backup

Re: 3.1.2.40 to 4.1.1.0 - was RE: Is DRM provided on the TSM 4.1 CD ?

2000-10-17 Thread Remeta, Mark
You will need to install 4.1.0.0 first to get the license files. Then you can do the upgrade to 4.1.1.0. My server is running NT so I can't help you there. My database is 10GB and around 80% utilized. I don't think it took very long to do the upgrade... I didn't time it and I don't remember

Re: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Serge Gaudet/EIG
Richard, Thanks for the clarification. (This has been a detail slightly obscure in my mind, and always just worked-around it) While on the subject then: Does the scheduler on the client need to be restarted each time the include/exclude list is modified? That's another item not

AW: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Klatt, Michael
Hi, and the inactive ones will be handeled by the verexists, verdeleted, retextra and retonly parameters, correct? regards michael -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2000 15:56 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re:

Steven Abrey/CUA/AU is out of the Office

2000-10-17 Thread Steven Abrey
I will be out of the office starting 10/17/2000 and will not return until 11/13/2000. I will respond to your message when I return. Please forward any problems to Ben Bos on #441

Re: AW: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
and the inactive ones will be handeled by the verexists, verdeleted, retextra and retonly parameters, correct? Michael - Sure; standard, usual policies pertain. Richard

Re: exclude.dir question

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
While on the subject then: Does the scheduler on the client need to be restarted each time the include/exclude list is modified? That's another item not documented (or very well hidden if it is documented). It has been my experience that it does. Can you confirm this? Serge - Good

Re: AW: DDS3 read DDS2 tape?

2000-10-17 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
Speed! -- Joshua S. Bassi IBM Certified - AIX Support, HACMP, Enterprise Disk(Shark) Tape Solutions Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shekhar Dhotre Sent: Tuesday, October 17,

MKSYSB's and Backupsets

2000-10-17 Thread Sean McNamara
Hello All, Scenario: - Do a MKSYSB to a flat file - Backup the image using TSM - Create a backupset of that image to tape or a CD - Use the image to recover a server. Would this image be bootable?? What are the possible problems or limitations

Re: MKSYSB's and Backupsets

2000-10-17 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
instead connect cd writer , and take mksysb on cd ... simple "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 10/17/2000 12:17:33 PM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400 cc: Subject: MKSYSB's and Backupsets Hello All,

Re: MKSYSB's and Backupsets

2000-10-17 Thread Tom Melton
If I am not mistaken, when a MKSYSB is done to disk, that image is NOT bootable, as it is not a tape device. For our SP system, we do the MKSYSB to disk, backup with ADSM, and use PSSP to reinstall the MKSYSB image in case of emergency. Tom Melton Emory University Emory HealthCare [EMAIL

Re: MKSYSB's and Backupsets

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
If I am not mistaken, when a MKSYSB is done to disk, that image is NOT bootable, as it is not a tape device. For our SP system, we do the MKSYSB to disk, backup with ADSM, and use PSSP to reinstall the MKSYSB image in case of emergency. For the CD case, there is the 'mkcd' command instead, new

RMAN and Resetlogs

2000-10-17 Thread Thiha Than
hi, Try the following. That's a suggestion from Oracle. You can perform join on RC_BACKUP_PIECE and RC_DATABASE_INCARNATION to get backup pieces for all incarnation. Likewise, for archivelogs of all incarnations use RC_ARCHIVED_LOG. regards, Thiha Hello everybody, I'm saving an

Re: FW: Do you want to receive my Out-Of-Office Autoreply?

2000-10-17 Thread Edward(Ed) J. Finnell, III
Also virus implications of Reply to: Send innocuous message to a LIST out-of-office replies to sender. Sender is a hacker and replies with a virus. Auto-reply opens it since it doesn't go thru and LIST filtering andjackpot..."in like Flynn". Edward(Ed) J. Finnell, III Enterprise Systems/Proj.

Re: Platforms for TSM

2000-10-17 Thread Joe Faracchio
All the points made so far are good ones. Well almost all. On the one hand you say you're a solaris shop. Then I would think it easy to run there to begin with and see how it goes. You can always 'recycle' the SUn box and switch to AIX/RS6K. On the other hand there's been a few times where

Re: adsm gui interface for unix servers

2000-10-17 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
For client invoke dsm , for server open netscape on AIX ... Shekhar "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 10/17/2000 02:15:36 PM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400 cc: Subject: adsm gui interface for

Re: Errors in the dmserror.log

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
...but with my exclude statement it should not be looking for these files Bruce - Your excludes list may need further adjustment... You have "Exclude C:\WINNT\Profiles\*", which is saying to exclude all basic-name files in the Profiles directory, but the files being processed are actually like

sun solaris and adsm

2000-10-17 Thread Selva, Perpetua
What is the latest version out there for the clients? Please let me know.. Thanks Perpetua Selva ARBC Dominion Securities Inc. Technical Analyst Global Markets Tel: (416-842-4528) Fax:(416-842-4335)

Web client access problems after 3.7.3 SM upgrade

2000-10-17 Thread Ken Sedlacek
Last night we upgraded ADSM 3.1.2.40 to TSM 3.7.3 without much difficulty. I am having problems with the IE5.0 web client access though. When trying to access the TSM server via IE5, I get an error message on the Java console saying: "Server parameter is missing. Please Set serverhladdress and

Problem mounting tape r/o on 3590 drive

2000-10-17 Thread Peter Hadikin
Hello, Recently we migrated to a mixed 3490/3590 tape environment. ADSM (V3.1.2.50) is running on VM/ESA V2 R3.0 SL9806. The problem is that when ADSM asks for a tape to be mounted r/o, the robotic unit mounts it r/w and ADSM rejects the tape since it is not r/o. Any idea why this is

No Subject

2000-10-17 Thread Dean Winger
"SIGNOFF ADSM-L"

Re: Web client access problems after 3.7.3 SM upgrade

2000-10-17 Thread Christine Wickham
Are you trying to use (what used to be called) Enterprise Administration Features. Any way, from the 3.1 admin guide documentation (which is where we still are): -Set SERVERHladdress--high_level_address- high_level_address Specifies the high-level address of the target

Re: Web client access problems after 3.7.3 SM upgrade

2000-10-17 Thread Mark A. Adams
RTFM Syntax -Set SERVERLladdress--tcp_port--- Parameters tcp_port (Required) Specifies the low level address of the server. Generally, this address is identical to the TCPPORT option in the server option file of the server. Examples Task Set the low level address

label libv causing aix errors and failing....

2000-10-17 Thread Tim Williams
FYI- Add another apar to the 'credit' listargh... Sum: TSM server on aix. TSM server level v3 r7 level 3.8 3494 with 12 3590 drives (which are in use most of the time). * Scenaio: needed to label libv with search=yes and volr=xx,yy and overwrite=yes during tape drive activity...

Re: Novell / Groupwise -todate restores

2000-10-17 Thread Ted Byrne
Larry, You may want to take some additional steps to reign in the volume usage by the Groupwise nodes. Because the transient files are all uniquely named (at least as far as we could tell), they are retained according to the RETONLY parameter of the MC that they are bound to. And since they