Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

Directory container storage pool ? is there any drawback to use such options? we have enough bandwidth 25G to support NFS mount points and its dedicated for backup servers. Regards Sarav -- Thanks & Regards, Saravanan Mobile:

Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

I agree, while we've done backups and restores of client data over NFS, I would be very leery of using it as a backend for storage pool data. I suspect you'll run into a conflict between what is safe (i.e. caching policy for dirty buffers) and what will perform well. Using something like NFS v4.1

AW: [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

st 2022 15:59 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool Hello, Please remove me from this list. Thank you! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Saravanan Palanisamy Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 9:49 AM

Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of > > Saravanan Palanisamy > > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 09:45 AM > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container > > storage pool > > > > Did any

Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

o: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container > storage pool > > Did anyone try using NFS file system as Directory container storage pool ? > > is there any drawback to use such options? > > we have enough bandwidth 25G to supp

Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

l Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of > Saravanan Palanisamy > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 09:45 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container > storage pool > > Did anyone try using NFS file sy

Re: NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

:00 to 15:30 Eastern   IBM -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Saravanan Palanisamy Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 09:45 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool Did anyone try using NFS file

NFS Storage used as directory container storage pool

Did anyone try using NFS file system as Directory container storage pool ? is there any drawback to use such options? we have enough bandwidth 25G to support NFS mount points and its dedicated for backup servers. Regards Sarav -- Thanks & Regards, Saravanan Mobile: +65-8228 4384

Re: Next Storage Pool of Container Storage Pool

.300 and tiered data. -- Michael Prix On 1/15/21 9:55 AM, Jansen, Jonas wrote: Hello all, we recently setup some container storage pools and used the ability to define a tape pool as a next storage pool (I think this is new in 8.1.10). As expected this, pool is used in case of an overflow. Has anyb

Next Storage Pool of Container Storage Pool

Hello all, we recently setup some container storage pools and used the ability to define a tape pool as a next storage pool (I think this is new in 8.1.10). As expected this, pool is used in case of an overflow. Has anybody some experiences in bringing back those data, "swapped" int

Re: Moving data in cloud storage pool

ckups here and let the old backups age out. Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/06/2020 07:14:03 AM: > From: "Jansen, Jonas" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 04/06/2020 07:22 AM > Subject: [EXTER

Re: Moving data in cloud storage pool

vider to another, via Spectrum Protect server operations (so the DB can reflect the changes), however it's not applicable at the moment. The workaround will be setting up a new storage pool on the system, then tier the data from the old pool to the new one. This way you can bypass the limitation and mi

Moving data in cloud storage pool

Hi, I have to move data from a bucket in a cloud container storage pool that unfortunately was created with the wrong owner. I understand that I can't change the owner of the bucket directly (on the S3 level), neither can I copy the data to a new bucket in S3 and change the bucket name

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

gt; -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Stefan Folkerts > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 2:10 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client > backing up aga

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan Folkerts Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 2:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool I understand, I didn't

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool Hi Arnaud, did you run tsm server instrumentation. It could help to identify where the issue is. We have tsm server that is connected

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 7:43 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client > backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool > > That's no fun, maybe we can help! > What storage are you using f

disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

** > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Stefan Folkerts > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 7:43 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subjec

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

Folkerts Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 7:43 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool That's no fun, maybe we can help! What storage are you using for your active log

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

M > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client > backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool > > Hi, > > With the directory containerpool you cannot, for as far as I know, disable > an attempt to ded

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

Subject: Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool Hi, With the directory containerpool you cannot, for as far as I know, disable an attempt to deduplicate the data and if the data is able to

Re: disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

t, so that its > data will not be compressed or deduplicated ? > > From my understanding, setting up "compression no" in the client option > file will be of no use, as the server will still be compressing the data at > storage pool level. > Likewise, setting up "de

disabling compression and/or deduplication for a client backing up against deduped/compressed directory-based storage pool

will not be compressed or deduplicated ? >From my understanding, setting up "compression no" in the client option file >will be of no use, as the server will still be compressing the data at storage >pool level. Likewise, setting up "deduplication no" in the client option file will r

Re: Has any one seen this: client restore mounting copy storage pool tape volumes?

Thanks, Marc! Need to improve my tech note search terms… Robert Talda EZ-Backup Systems Engineer Cornell University +1 607-255-8280 r...@cornell.edu > On Nov 16, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Marc Lanteigne wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > Yes this can happen. It's explained

Re: Has any one seen this: client restore mounting copy storage pool tape volumes?

mounting copy storage pool tape volumes? Folks: TSM Server 7.1.7.200 running on Linux x86_64 (Red Hat 6.8) TSM client 7.1.6.0 running on what appears to be Red Hat 5.7 (kernel 2.6.18-300.el5) Local system admin is performing a BMR on a system that has been backing for years to the same TSM

Has any one seen this: client restore mounting copy storage pool tape volumes?

being pulled down. What is puzzling me is that the session associated with the restore just mounted a volume from our copy storage pool: tsm: ADSM7>select * from sessions where session_id=179758 SESSION_ID: 179758 START_TIME: 2017-11-16 11:00:50.00 COMMMETHOD: Tcp

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

> >> > >> -- > >> Sasa Drnjevic > >> www.srce.unizg.hr > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 18.7.2017. 14:48, Zoltan Forray wrote: > >>> TSM Linux server 7.1.6.3. Client is Linux 7.1.6.4. > >>> >

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

gt; Mobile +39 342 847 2983 > www.linkedin.com/in/giacomotesta > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 18:08 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

4. >>> >>> This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" when it >>> isn't true. >>> >>> ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node >> VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU >>> (Linux x86-64) - no spac

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

the second time I have had this "failure" when it >>> isn't true. >>> >>> ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node >> VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU >>> (Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACKUPPOOL and all >>> successor pool

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

www.linkedin.com/in/giacomotesta -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 18:08 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

4. > > > > This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" when it > > isn't true. > > > > ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node > VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU > > (Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACK

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

; when it > > isn't true. > > > > ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node > VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU > > (Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACKUPPOOL and all > > successor pools. > > > > But it isn't true. The BACKUPPOOL p

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:40 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but there > is plenty of space > > Yep - 100+ scratch tapes in both tape libraries. As I mentioned, there is > no s

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Node has mount points? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

tch/empty)? > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:24 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but there >

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Do you have lib volumes available (scratch/empty)? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:24 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

the backup is attempting to store > exceeds the amount of available storage space in the pool? > > Recall that before sending the data the backup validates with the server > that there is sufficient space to store the data. If I recall correctly > that number is before compression. >

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

: dinsdag 18 juli 2017 14:49 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of > space > > TSM Linux server 7.1.6.3. Client is Linux 7.1.6.4. > > This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" when it >

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

tch mounts. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: dinsdag 18 juli 2017 14:49 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: No space available in storage po

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

that number is before compression. Also noted this in your storage pool details below? Pct Logical: 99.9 -Rick Adamson -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 9:13 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Long shot...Maybe this could help: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21684682 ... This problem is seen for an almost full (sequential) storage pool as well as for a pool that has enough space available. If the storage pool gets full while a backup/archive operation is running

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

wrote: > Hi, > You can get this error if the storage pool gets full during backup (no > scratch tapes, mount points). > If this pool is full before backup starts - it will go to the next storage > pool. > Mark this pool as readonly and start backup. it will switch to the tape >

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

I should have mentioned that no, I do not set file size limits: 9:12:03 AM PROCESSOR : q stg backuppool f=d Storage Pool Name: BACKUPPOOL Storage Pool Type: Primary Device Class Name: DISK Storage Type

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

Hi, You can get this error if the storage pool gets full during backup (no scratch tapes, mount points). If this pool is full before backup starts - it will go to the next storage pool. Mark this pool as readonly and start backup. it will switch to the tape (next storage pool). Efim > 18 и

Re: No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

"failure" when it > isn't true. > > ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU > (Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACKUPPOOL and all > successor pools. > > But it isn't true. The BACKUPPOOL pool is only 92% used (of

No space available in storage pool failure but there is plenty of space

TSM Linux server 7.1.6.3. Client is Linux 7.1.6.4. This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" when it isn't true. ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU (Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACKUPPOOL and all

Re: Protect Storage Pool and Replicate Node Process Issuance

45 mig stg vvpool lo=0 50 del volhist type=all todate=-30 We still use virtual volumes for the DBB even though you can make a good argument that the DBB is less important in a fully synchronized container storage pool environment and can be put on a local file

Protect Storage Pool and Replicate Node Process Issuance

rning when the majority of our backups are done, allow that to complete, then later in the day run a "replicate node" command. This seems like it should work to me, and I started by creating scripts to run the protect storage pool and been running the replicate node command for a few da

Database impact of storage pool convertion

Hi list, Impact on the database size and activty is less when using directory container storage pools (NextGen) compared to using deduplication enabled file storage pools (Legacy). My question is about database size (and activity) during and after the converrstion from deduplication enabled

Re: more than one vtl per storage pool

ain limits are imposed. > > > 1. Limit of 150 TB per library. > This is possibly the largest limit. > > > If by chance, a library needs to grow beyond the 150 TB limit, we could > just stand up another library. However, can a storage pool span multiple > libraries? > > I don't think so, but wanted to ask. >

Re: more than one vtl per storage pool

azon s3 storage. > > Using their storage gateway and vtl interface certain limits are imposed. > > > 1. Limit of 150 TB per library. > This is possibly the largest limit. > > > If by chance, a library needs to grow beyond the 150 TB limit, we could just > st

more than one vtl per storage pool

. Limit of 150 TB per library. This is possibly the largest limit. If by chance, a library needs to grow beyond the 150 TB limit, we could just stand up another library. However, can a storage pool span multiple libraries? I don't think so, but wanted to ask.

Question about Define a directory-container storage pool in V7.1.3

Hello to all I wonder if in the new feature on V7.1.3.100 call “Define a directory-container storage pool” , improving dedup inbound. Did I need the same process as in previous version. In previous version for running a deduplication from the client side need to registering or updating

Re: Re: moving to new copy storage pool

Updated the device class to refer to the second library? The pools would remain associated with the device class, the (new|moved) drives would be defined to the new library, and the tapes would be checked out of the old library and checked into the new one (with the device class change in

moving to new copy storage pool

We are upgrading our server from v5.5.4 to 6.2.5. At the same time, we are changing platforms to redhat on x86 from suse under vm. I have tested the upgrade process, and it seems to work well. In the current 5.5 server, the primary tape pool uses the same devclass as the offsite copy pool. I

Re: moving to new copy storage pool

Op 22 jan. 2014, om 17:52 heeft Lee, Gary g...@bsu.edu het volgende geschreven: We are upgrading our server from v5.5.4 to 6.2.5. At the same time, we are changing platforms to redhat on x86 from suse under vm. vm (mainframe) or vmware? And if VMWare, is tape (physical or virtual)

Re: moving to new copy storage pool

] moving to new copy storage pool We are upgrading our server from v5.5.4 to 6.2.5. At the same time, we are changing platforms to redhat on x86 from suse under vm. I have tested the upgrade process, and it seems to work well. In the current 5.5 server, the primary tape pool uses the same

Re: moving to new copy storage pool

] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] moving to new copy storage pool We are upgrading our server from v5.5.4 to 6.2.5. At the same time, we are changing platforms to redhat on x86 from suse under vm. I have tested the upgrade process

Re: Re: moving to new copy storage pool

On 01/22/2014 05:36 PM, Remco Post wrote: indeed, the trick is to change the primary pool, new device class, new pool etc. The copy pool can remain unchanged. Now, you do make me doubt about what we did 10 years ago when we got our second library. We moved tapes, I'm sure of that. Updated the

Re: Move data to another storage pool

: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:26 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data to another storage pool Does Q CONTENT show filenames for you? Mine shows nothing. -Original Message- From

Re: Move data to another storage pool

I am having a similar problem. Is this a deduplicated storage pool? In my case I'm suspecting that has something to do with it. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tristan Kelkermans Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 12:19 PM

Re: Move data to another storage pool

in it.. Tristan 2013/10/10 Prather, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com I am having a similar problem. Is this a deduplicated storage pool? In my case I'm suspecting that has something to do with it. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tristan

Re: Move data to another storage pool

to another storage pool Hi, Absolutely both are storage pools with dedup enabled. Maybe it has to do with tails of big files written in these volumes as Grigori said but i'm not sure about it. Query content doesn't show any files in those volumes but when you do an audit volume it finds more than one

Re: Move data to another storage pool

I can't offer many details on this, because the mists of time have descended, but I had an issue similar to this when I was moving all data off a file-based, deduplicated pool to a VTL-based pool. After all the data had apparently been moved to the VTL there were still volumes left with

Re: Move data to another storage pool

: 2013-10-10 10:46 Subject: Re: Move data to another storage pool Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Hi, Absolutely both are storage pools with dedup enabled. Maybe it has to do with tails of big files written in these volumes as Grigori said but i'm not sure about

Re: Move data to another storage pool

+Manager/page/Home ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2013-10-10 10:45:42: From: Tristan Kelkermans tkelkerm...@atoosys.com To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 2013-10-10 10:46 Subject: Re: Move data to another storage pool Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu

Re: Move data to another storage pool

/ Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Tristan Kelkermans tkelkerm...@atoosys.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 10 Octobre 2013 22:18:48 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data to another storage pool Yes, nothing in the actlog and the move data completes with Success

Re: Move data to another storage pool

Does Q CONTENT show filenames for you? Mine shows nothing. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann Simon Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data to another storage pool

Move data to another storage pool

Hello all, I'm moving content from one storage pool to another one using command move data *volume_name *stg=*other_stg* * * Unfortunately, some volumes stay in 'Filling' status whereas the move data process completed successfully. When I try to move data from this volume again, nothing changes

Re: Move data to another storage pool

Tristen, Why not just configure the original storage pool to use the new storage pool as it's next storage pool, then migrate the data rather than performing a move data on all the volumes? For example: 1.Create the new storage pool 2. configure your backup copy groups the original stg pool

Re: Move data to another storage pool

the original storage pool to use the new storage pool as it's next storage pool, then migrate the data rather than performing a move data on all the volumes? For example: 1.Create the new storage pool 2. configure your backup copy groups the original stg pool to use the new stg pool. 2

Re: Move data to another storage pool

use the same Storage Pool Data Format. Confirm that the volumes being moved do not have any read/write errors, and that there aren't any I/O errors on the device during the move. Make sure that the new storage pool has sufficient space to accommodate the move. When executing the move data

Re: Move data to another storage pool

-Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tristan Kelkermans Sent: 09 10 2013 7:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Move data to another storage pool Hello all, I'm moving content from one storage pool to another one using command

suggestions on setting up a Dell MD3260 as primary storage pool

We are changing our backup system and plan on using a Dell MD3260 as a primary disk storage device. It will house all backups from the local site as well as replicated data from the remote site. It will function as a primary stgpool only. The tape library that is also attached will eventually

Re: suggestions on setting up a Dell MD3260 as primary storage pool

] suggestions on setting up a Dell MD3260 as primary storage pool We are changing our backup system and plan on using a Dell MD3260 as a primary disk storage device. It will house all backups from the local site as well as replicated data from the remote site. It will function as a primary stgpool

Sequential disk storage pool performance

We have two TSM 6.2.2.0 TSM servers in different locations running under zSeries Linux. Both use sequential disk storage pools on IBM XIV disk to store the primary copies of backup files. The databases and recovery logs are also on XIV disk. We are still in the process of migrating workload to

SV: Stopping NDMP backup storage pool

Platform for CPU2TSM: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Grant Street [mailto:gra...@al.com.au] Skickat: den 12 juni 2012 03:25 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Stopping NDMP backup storage pool we have a NDMP backup storage pool running

Stopping NDMP backup storage pool

we have a NDMP backup storage pool running and it is Waiting for mount of scratch volume (345071 seconds). We have some tapes that are in the library but the checkin process is waiting even though I used checkl=barcode. How do I get it to die/recover? This is the library controller instance

Re: reclaim of file storage pool

Does TSM v6.3 reclaim .bfs files that have been dedupped? When we try we get the error Tim has described below. On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:17:31 -0600 Andrew Carlson naclos...@gmail.com wrote: The first thing I would check, is that you have full volumes that are 10% full (90% reclaimable),

reclaim of file storage pool

TSM 6.3 Our first drop stgpool uses devclass of disk, our next stgpool coded is on disk with a devclass of file, so the data is stored as .bfs files and their file sizes are 2048mb. This stgpool DEVT_PRIM is defined with dedup=yes. Over time the pct utilization of these bfs files drops as

Re: reclaim of file storage pool

The first thing I would check, is that you have full volumes that are 10% full (90% reclaimable), which is what the 90 in your command specifies. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 14:30, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote: TSM 6.3 Our first drop stgpool uses devclass of disk, our next stgpool coded is

Re: reclaim of file storage pool

-L] reclaim of file storage pool The first thing I would check, is that you have full volumes that are 10% full (90% reclaimable), which is what the 90 in your command specifies. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 14:30, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote: TSM 6.3 Our first drop stgpool uses devclass

Antwort: [ADSM-L] replicate with file storage pool

, Alex Von:Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Datum: 03.02.2012 15:38 Betreff:[ADSM-L] replicate with file storage pool Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU We are testing 6.3 replication, the file disk pools devclass has maxcapacity

replicate with file storage pool

We are testing 6.3 replication, the file disk pools devclass has maxcapacity of 20GB and maxscr=50 The first replicate created 10 .bfs files all, all less then 6% used and all filling/rw The second created 26 additional .bfs files all, all less then 6% used except for 1 at 22% and all

Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Good morning. I was hoping someone can help me with the following:- TSM Server version 6.1.4.1 Host AIX, version 5.3 TL12 Clients back their data up initially to my EXODISKPOOL, this is then migrated to my primary storage pool EXOSATAPOOL. When this migration is happening I am seeing messages

Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

,current figure!) empty volumes assigned to the storage pool? This has only recently started happening - before it would only create scratch volumes when it had run out of Empty volumes. ... Snip of q vol stgpool=exosatapool and grep'd for Empty /sata_vol_71/sata5058.d- EXOSATAPOOL SATACLASS

Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

December 2011 11:20 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes Steve, does this command also list your empty volumes: q v stg=exosatapool stat=emp acc=reado,unav -- jim.o...@yale.edu On 12/22/2011 4:23 AM, Copper, Steve wrote: ... My

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Return code 11. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of James R Owen Sent: 22 December 2011 11:20 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes Steve, does this command also list your

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Of Lloyd Dieter Sent: 22 December 2011 14:59 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes Check and see what MAXSCRATCH is set to on xosatapool. If you predefined the volumes, it should probably be 0. Also, I've seen it do this if you

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Does anyone know how to take this select command which produces only one month of data and allow it to go back say 1 year if possible. I have tried to figure it out but nothing works select date(start_time) as Start Date,time(start_time) as Start Time,date(end_time) as End Date,time(end_time)

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes Does anyone know how to take this select command which produces only one month of data and allow it to go back say 1 year if possible. I have tried to figure it out but nothing works select date(start_time) as Start Date,time

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Perfect Thank you -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 11:10 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes

@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lepre, James Sent: Thursday, 22 December, 2011 16:59 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [adsm] Re: Storage pool using scratch volumes instead of empty volumes Does anyone know how to take this select command which produces only one month of data and allow it to go back

Thoughts on changing an offsite storage pool

We are finally able to move into electronic vaulting. I will now have another 3494 to put into our offsite location. My problem is how to get the current offsite data into the new library most expediciously. If I understand correctly, a device class is associated with a particular library;

Re: Thoughts on changing an offsite storage pool

@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject [ADSM-L] Thoughts on changing an offsite storage pool We are finally able to move into electronic vaulting. I will now have another 3494 to put into our offsite location. My problem is how to get the current offsite data into the new library most expediciously

Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

G0.30.390 70 TS1130 BACKUPPOOL DISK 6,369 G 100.0 33.990 70 TS1130 Why would a disk storage pool be 100% Utilized and only 34% migratable when I don't have Caching turned on? Zoltan Forray TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached I think I know the answer to this question but figured it would be a good question to ask, This morning I was getting reports that backups were failing due to backups not being able to get space in the disk stgpool

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: Why would a disk storage pool be 100% Utilized and only 34% migratable when I don't have Caching turned on? A considerable factor is that Pct Migr represents committed data. Richard Sims

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

PM Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi Zoltan, Is it possible you had a very large (or several) backup running using the remaining 66% (over 4 tb) of your backup pool ? Current backups

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >