Load up dsmc with the right .opt file
then enter
q ses - will be prompted for username and password
q tsa - this will prompt you for a Netware username and passward
q tsa nds - this again prompts for the NW username and pw
Once you've entered those it should pickup ok.
..Rikk
You made what I made in the same case :
Try move data
Then update vol to readonly and audit vol. It never ask me the tape and I
had the same message as you.
Regards,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ripke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Boireau,
AIX 4.3.3.0, TSM 4.2.3.2. Since we'r running this level, server crashes
at least once every day.
Activity log is clueless, dsmserv.err log gives:
01/15/2003 02:14:49 ANRD Same condition variable destruct more than once;
thread 138 (tid 0).
01/15/2003 02:14:49 ANR7838S
Doing an archive operation for the same file on two different systems
results in different amount of data getting transferred.
I am clueless about the cause of this. Can someone explain this?
Environment:
TSM Server Version 3.7.04 on AIX 4.3.3
TSM Client Version 3.1.07 on HP-UX 10.20 A
Many
Jeff,
I think you probably can do this; at worst you may have to do the
upgrade db at 5.1.5.0 - I think that's the new base at version 5.
Another thing to remember is that the server will need re-licensing
at V5. It also uses a different connectivity for the tape drives
- at 4.2.1.9 you use
Hi all TSMers
I need some dummies guide kind of pointers here. I have downloaded a copy
of the performance tuning guide for TSM server 4.2 and it has lots of great
info.
But where do I start? Here is my basic situation.
TSM Server 4.2.2.12 running on an Sun E250 1GB memory, 400Mhz, Solaris 2.7
Thank you for your reply.
Unfortuenately this method doesn't work in our case.
Only the specific connection will be disconnected by idle 1H
even we ping every 5 mins from server to storageagent.
Had a similar problem and one solution would be to write a script on
your TSM Server that pings the
My recovery log is filling up at a rapid rate. I am running TSM at 4.1.3
on the mainframe. It is 4.6 GB and my DB is 48 GB with 46 GB in use. I am
not running expiration of the inventory yet due to a previous deletion of a
nodes data, could that be the cause? I noticed that the log is reaching
Hi Brian,
couple of things to check.
Is your TDP fo Domino using correct notes.ini file? I already had problem
with this. On Domino server there was couple of copies of notes.ini file in
various
directiries and despite the fact I had in domdsm.cfg set the correct one,
TDP was using another copy
no when you do not expiration you db grows but the log may grow with un-backed
up
databasr. try to backup your database more frequently or increase your db. or
you may change your
log type.
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
Hi Joni,
I have been there. I am on the Mainframe also. The DB backup
trigger does work. I started to do an incremental DB backup just before
the backup would start in the evening. It helped me out a lot. The version
you are on 4.1.x has the log limit of 5GB. Version 4.2 and above
David,
Upgrading from 4.2.1.9 to 4.2.3.0 there should be no need to
issue the upgrade db command.
If you were upgrading from ADSM 3.X or TSM 3.7 to TSM 4.2.X.
During the upgrade the database should be automatically
upgraded but sometimes this does not happen. When you start the
TSM server you'll
Kunio Miyazawa wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
Unfortuenately this method doesn't work in our case.
Only the specific connection will be disconnected by idle 1H
even we ping every 5 mins from server to storageagent.
That's because an ICMP packet isn't the same connection as your TCP data.
We aren't using SSA, but it's similar - it's Shark. I had planned to
completely import all the vgs from the S7A.
Sorry I didn't mention that.
Ramnarayan, Sean
A [EDS] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SARamnarayan@CAL
I'm running Windows XP with Winzip 8.1 and have zipped files and directories
with and without archive flag set.
After uncompressing the archive flag was *always* set.
So it seems that in my environment Networker would correctly backup unzipped
directories and files.
What environment (Windows NT,
I was running TSM 4.2.1.9 on OS390/2.10 and upgraded yesterday to TSM
4.2.3.0 and now I am receiving the following error messages:
ANRD SMNODE(2008): ThreadId942 Duplicate object encountered during
import or rename.
Anyone else have this same problem and what did you do to correct?
Good morning,
We are currently backing up our NT Lotus Domino environment using TDP and
our e-mail group wants to rename some of the Domino servers. So here are my
questions, can I simply rename the node as defined to TSM and if yes how
does TDP handle the transactional logs for Domino? The way
Hi David!
Looks like APAR IC29251 which is fixed in 4.2.3.2. You can however ignore
this message, according to the APAR text it is not an error.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: David Browne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
As embarassed as I am to admit thisI must confess that collation turned out NOT to
be the problem (with all my scratch tapes disappearing) afterall. Instead, it would
appear that I inadvertantly (or carelessly - whichever you prefer) deactiveated my
'Delete Volhist Admin Schedule' back in
If you rename the node in TSM this will simply force a new full backup to
which subsequent transaction log archives will be associated with. The
transaction logs from the old backups remain until the databases to which
they are associated expire. You need to run regular INACTIVATELOGS
commands
Since Upgrade from 5.1.5.4 to 5.1.5.7 for Windows2000 Client
I can see sesssion at the tsm server in idle state. I believe they survive
the scheduler start and query for next task.
Does anyone has the same experience with the new fixlevel?
Our Server is 4.2.3.0 on MVS 2.10 / 64 Bit mode
Stefan
Yes. I have seen it tooargh
So far, I have just cancelled the session at the server level, and it will
go away until the next time the service is cycled..
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
I've seen it too but don't think it's a problem. The session eventually
times out...
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with W2k Client 5.1.5.7
Since Upgrade from 5.1.5.4
That may be, but it is still new to this client version and should not
occur.
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with W2k Client 5.1.5.7
I've seen it too but don't
Hello TSMers.
After a breakdown of the accessor in our 3494 I had to put it in manual
mode while the CE was working on it. After the CE had done his job, I
put the 3494 back into Auto mode. But my TSM server couldn't mount any
of the volumes which I had touched in manual mode. All the volumes was
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 20:17, Jacque Mergens wrote:
I am attempting to perform two different backup schedules on the same client.
The reason for this is that I need to run a lengthy preschedulecmd prior to
backing up a single directory but don't want this to hold up the backup of
all of the
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 09:59, Hokanson, Mark wrote:
Currently:(TSM Server v4.2.1.9, TSM Client v4.2.1.25, TSM Storage Agent
v4.2.1.9 )
What is the recommendation if you don't want to upgrade yet to v5.1.x?
Might want to rethink that decision not to upgrade to 5.1.x. Version
4.2.x of TSM goes
Did you allow the library to inventory? Your library may have been set to not do an
inventory audit after the doors are closed, which means any volumes you touched, would
be in
unknown locations.
bob
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:37:59PM +0100, Emil S. Hansen wrote:
Hello TSMers.
After a
...But my TSM server couldn't mount any of the volumes which I
had touched in manual mode. ...
Using volumes in Manual Mode affects their status:
The 3494 redbook (SG24-4632) says that when volumes are used in
Manual Mode, their LMDB indicator is set to Manual Mode, as used
to direct error
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 13:31, Rajesh Oak wrote:
You have to close Outlook to backup the pst file. Outlook puts an
exclusive lock on the pst when it is open and therefore cannot be
backed up. I have the same problem.
Solution to this problem.
If you need your personal folder to be backed up,
Might want to rethink that decision not to upgrade to 5.1.x.
Version 4.2.x of TSM goes out of support in mid-April.
Hopefully that gives them enough time to get a worthwhile version of 5.1.x
out. So far we don't have one.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:
Brian,
If you are renaming the TSM NODENAME and the Domino server name,
all of your old backups (database and log files) will remain
on the TSM server... untouched.
Are you planning to rename the filespaces too?
TDP for Domino filespaces have the Domino Server in the name,
and so, if you do not
Hi, TSMers,
How to make System Disaster Recovery backup tapes using tape library,
and differentiate them with data backup tapes to admin easily?
Thanks for any information.
Tao Jiang
Coban Research Technologies
www.cobantech.com
713-271-7888 ext. 207
HI, folks...
I have the following problem:
when I try to restore a database (DOMINO) in a AIX, I receive this error message:
01/15/03 13:43:20 ANS0101E NLInit: Unable to open message repository
'dsmclientV3.cat'.
How can I resolve this problem ???
thanks,
Jorge Martins
Service IT
Thanks Del. I was aware of the file space rename and I did consider leaving
the old name there for 45 days (don't ask), but as you said we will be
testing this before we apply the procedure to any production server. I was
just looking for a head start.
Thanks again for the information.
-
Hi TSMers
I am looking at what to do in the next year or so when our tape library
becomes full. Baring in mind that we don't do much in the way of restores
(most backups are for DR), is it feasible to remove tapes from the library
and just keep them on site in case they are requested for a
I am looking at what to do in the next year or so when our tape library
becomes full. ...
Assuming that you don't have room for another frame, your management
could consider upgrading to higher-density drives and effectively
increase the capacity of your library. Too costly? They need to
Hi...
I discovered the problem about that, but I have another problemin TDP for
Domino, too.
when I try to restore a database with this command:
domdsmc restore mail05/pr015557.nsf
/configfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin/data02.cfg /pick=showall /activate=no
/pit=09/01/2003
that becomes a real nightmare fast !
I've had to do that in the past and I can say that it really REALLY isn't
what you want to do !
How big is your library ? I'd look into adding a storage expansion frame.
OR look into drive upgrades from B's to E's... that alone doubles your
capacity, then if
Hi Minns,
We are currently doing that. Taking tapes out of the library and leave them
onsite for restore purposes but it's a pain to place the tape back into the
library to perform the restore. The data may reside on multiple tapes.
Are you running reclaimation on your onsite tapes? If you are,
I would so strongly recommend that you do not remove onsite storage
volumes from you library if you can help it at all. Yes it will work,
but when you need to do restores, or reclaimation management becomes a
full time job. When we out grew our system I had a similar situation, I
ended up having
Shouldn't your date be 01/09/2003 ?
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Martins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unable to restore in TDP for Domino.
Hi...
I discovered the problem about that, but I have another
Jorge,
Try this WITHOUT the /PIT option to see if you
see all of your backups for that database.
(The parsing of the date on the /PIT option
maybe be causing problems.)
You could also try with DATEFORMAT 1 to see if it helps.
If you still do not see them, try using
a wildcard (*) and specify
The web client requres PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE, so it always uses
GENERATE, regardless of what is in your options file. (On Windows, the
scheduler service works the same way.)
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
We will be looking into this. I will provide an update when more
information is available.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
Glad you found it!
However, regarding the collocation=no issue on copypools
Having done TSM DR recoveries at an offsite location a few times, let me
share my experiences. When I started with TSM I had one copypool with
colloc=no. We then did our first DR recovery test where my goal was to
Since then I've been
able to put an SQL query together to get that info but it takes quite
a
while to execute.
Can you share that code with us?
David
We are currently using TSM version 5.1.5.2 to backup our N-class servers
running HP-UX 11.00. In order to test restores, we are attempting to
restore backups to a virtual node and have found that we are unable to
restore the entire directory structure. For
example, on the system being backed up,
Hello Farren.
As others have said, and I cannot agree more, yes you can do this but it
gets ugly.real quick!
Tape reclamation is the area which I find suffers the most, particularly
for copypool reclamation. How much depends greatly on your mgmtclass
parms for version limits, expiration,
Sure, probably on your new server those don't exist as filesystems
Only filesystems may be used in domains so the source server is treating
them as filesystems.
the filesystem is part of a key internally in tsm...
on your ~test~ box you probably only have /var as the filesystem...
use something
For those running 5.1.6.0 and are having the core dump problems I just heard
that the release 5.1.6.1 is being pushed back to 2/14. I also heard support
recommended pulling 5.1.6.0 off the ftp site due to these core dumps.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:
Allen makes a critical implied statement of YOU MUST TEST YOUR RECOVERY PLAN
!
If not and you have to use it and it doesn't go smooth...
Personally, I classify myself as probably being at the lowest place on the
earth... and even if something were to initially miss me, it would
My customer here encountered that. The only time we have seen it core
dump was when an admin went in through the web browser, drilled down to
nodes and clicked on a specific node.
Again, IBM/Tivoli aren't following the strictest QA methodology in
verifying stability of this product.
--
Joshua
Hello David. I use this script to get a list of tapes. It is not perfect
because it gets tapes with inactive files as well as active files but it is
fairly quick. Usually under 5 minutes or so which is not too bad considering
how much data it has to wade through!
Usage: RUN BRSLIST SERVERNAME
4.2.3.0 is not good enough. You need to go to 4.2.3.2.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Charakondala, Chandrasekhar R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Any side
ive been going round and round with tsm support on this issue... we have an
AIX 4.3.3 client that has been upgraded several times all the way to 5.1.5
client version without success backing up to an AIX 4.3.3 tsm 4.2.2 server
over a 10/100 ethernet network (100 Full Duplex, no autonegotiate.)
Why isn't 4.2.3.0 not good enough? Let me know as we just upgraded to 4.2.3.0 on both
the AIX TSM Servers and NT TSM servers.
Rajesh Oak
--
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:57:40
Seay, Paul wrote:
4.2.3.0 is not good enough. You need to go to 4.2.3.2.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon
I had this problem on a new implementation. Is your tcpserveraddress coded with the
dns name or the ip adress? We chenged it to the ip adress and the problems went away.
There was probably an error somewhere in the vlans but I'm not an ip guru...
Guillaume Gilbert
CGI Canada
Conko, Steven
Has anyone out there had any kind of FTP/TSM speed problems and what have
they done to fix them. We seem to be getting 1-2 GB an hour speed on 100
MB Ethernet cards, even with RESOURCEUTILIZATION 5. The server is an AIX
SP-node at 5.1.0.5, and the Linux86 clients are from 4.2.0 to 5.1.5.0.
Seems
tcp server address is set to IP, as well as client address. severname is
using the dns short name.
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Réf. : tcp layer problem
I had this problem
Hi, we have same thing here, seems bound to scheduler sessions,
regards
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
Information Technology
Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800
Hi, I fully agree. Specially after the experience of restoring one single
destroyed tape in primary pool that implied mounting 85 copy tapes!!
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
Yikes! Okay, point(s) taken...Copypool set back to collate @ node level!
Thanks again;
Theresa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/15/03 02:18PM
Hi, I fully agree. Specially after the experience of restoring one single
destroyed tape in primary pool that implied mounting 85 copy tapes!!
It depends on the size of your library too. We don't Collocate and we had a
Disaster Recovery test and it was successful. We had time on our hand too with the 36
hours time limits
David C. Pearson
IS Production Support Analyst
System Network Service
Snohomish County PUD # 1
...
ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure.
appears almost constantly during backups. ...
I should think you would have TCP error indications aplenty in the TSM error log
on the AIX which should give some indication of the nature of the problem.
I would start by running
I have not seen that one. We went from 4.2.2.12 to v4.2.3 last week.
The only thing we are having a problem with are backupsets are taking
extremely long. But this was an issue before going to v4.2.3. Support
said the problem was with 'orphaned' system objects, and v4.2.3 would
correct the
APAR IC35417 has been opened for this problem.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The
We have had several customers report this issue. Please check the level of
the bos.net.tcp.client for you AIX server. If the reported level for this
component is at 5.1.0.37, call the support center and apply the fix for
APAR IY36925. I have included the problem description for this APAR below:
You have to be at 4.2.3.2 and there is a special patch you may have to put
on if cleanup backupgroups fails at the 4.2.3.2 level. Has a cleanup
backupgroups been run?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Michael Moore [mailto:[EMAIL
HI,
Has anyone that uses the ABC client for OpenVMS upgraded to the brand new version of
3.1.0.5? We would like to use the feature that allows the logs to be sent over to the
TSM server - but would like to make sure it is stable.
Thanks,
%%
Jane Bamberger
IS Department
Just tried formatting a new storage pool volume on the above system. First
time since upgrading to 5.1.5.x.
Seeing lots of errors: LVDD LVM_IO_FAIL is the message.
Nothing in ERRPT but these errors. Nothing to point to a specific hardware
failure. Physically checked the drives (SSA) and can see
Hi Jane,
We are running ABC 3.1.0.6 for our OpenVMS clients (2 of them). We have
not used the log feature to my knowledge but as far as normal backup and
restore processing is concerned we have had not stability issues with this
client.
Sorry I can't provide you with any more information than
we're running AIX 4.3.3 server and clients. server is TSM V4.2.2, clients
are generally 4.2 as well.
what should we have our tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsize set to? i know the
suggested size is 64 and 32 respectively, but the book mentions increasing
them if the resources are available. i have
Or, dump the ATL, go manual drives, and take management along on the test -
to be your Picker Arm. They'll pay for what you need really fast!
Another option to collocation of your offsite pool (you can send a tape
offsite each day with 1 file on it if you're not careful) is to use
multiple
Can you do the following and re-post with what you have set for the following?
smitty devices - SSA disks - SSA Logical Disks - Change/Show
Characteristics of an SSA Logical Disk - select hdiskxx (where xx is the
hdisk where you are defining the volume)
Look at the following fields:
1.
Just because a user has a .pst on his computer, and Outlook open, it
doesn't mean the file is open. You can have multiple .pst files on the
PC, and not have Outlook open them. Also, if there is more than one
Outlook mail profile on the client and they both have .pst files, then
one of the .pst
Hi all,
I noted these messages in activity log yesterday, they occured during tape
audit process:
15-01-2003 22:44:59 ANRD bfaggrut.c(521): SrvId 0, superBfId
0.47004734
contains too many sub-bitfiles.
15-01-2003 22:44:59 ANRD bfrtrv.c(1299): Error 87
I had a core dump yesterday on a 5.1.6.0 TSM server (AIX).
After reading this letter I tried to click on a node from the web browser,
and the server produced a core dump
for the first try. The query node from the command line client works ok.
Imre Csatlos
-Original Message-
From: Joshua
78 matches
Mail list logo
