Sean Hederman wrote:
Shouldn't you be using VARIANT_BOOL instead of bool if interfacing with COM?
Maybe - not sure about the rules here. (Any clarifications most welcome.)
But even if so: I can mark those bool values with
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType::U1)], and the COM wrapper will *still*
overwrite
Friends...
I need a small suggestion from U...
We r developing a product in C# and we want to provide MLS support for that... If
anybody experianced in this type of multi languages support, will U pls suggest me the
best way to do...?? How will U display the data in runtime, and where to
Hi list,
Could any body refer me any online resource from where I can learn how to
write Windows scheduler in C#?
Thanks in advance
Shishir Kumar Mishra
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested
The client calls are made from a ThreadPool thread (initiated by
QueueUserWorkItem).
Just to be clear - are you saying that a thread which initiates BeginSend
successfully (i.e. no exceptions and CompletedSynchronously == false) must
not terminate until the EndSend is received? Surely the EndSend
Hi Salai,
You might want to have a look at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcon/html/
vboriinternationalization.asp
When you are using vs.studio it should be fairly easy,
to globalization/localization in your app.
HTH
// Ryan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Nope, my mistake. Didn't read your email with enough care. VARIANT_BOOL is for COM
servers, not .NET servers. If you're writing a managed server though, surely bool
should be replaced with System::Boolean? I haven't worked much with MC++, and don't
know what the mappings (if any) are between
Correct.
.NET utilizes the I/O completion port asynchronous socket model
(WSASend/WSARecv) and therefore has the same restrictions as unmanaged code
using that model. One of those restrictions is that the thread initiating
the socket operation cannot terminate before it is completed or the asynch
That's not our situation, but it's news to me so I'd like to clarify: If
we create a thread which calls BeginSend sucessfully
(CompletedSynchronously == false) then terminates, then EndSend will
complete indicating a cancellation. I've used completion port before (in
my C++ and Win32 days) and I
I am having a problem getting SQL Server and .NET to agree on the sort order
for some data.
My sort column in SQL Server is character data ([varchar] (255) COLLATE
SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS). As I understand this, the data sorts in
dictionary order. Thus, a value of F-SA sorts between FR and
I am having a problem getting SQL Server and .NET to agree on
the sort order for some data.
My sort column in SQL Server is character data ([varchar]
(255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS). As I understand
this, the data sorts in dictionary order. Thus, a value of
F-SA sorts
I think this is a bug in the framework - I vaguely recall we ran into
this a while ago
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Claus Brod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 5:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Marshaling bool return values from managed to
Ok, let's go.
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Stonecash
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 14:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and SQL Server
I am having
Shishir,
Can you be more specific as to what you mean by Windows scheduler? Do
you mean the functionality of the Windows threads scheduler?
Srihari
Shishir Kumar Mishra wrote:
Hi list,
Could any body refer me any online resource from where I can learn how to
write Windows scheduler in C#?
Thanks
I would say he means the windows scheduler. This is apart of the
operating system, you know.
http://www.iopus.com/guides/winscheduler.htm for a beginner intro into
this part of Windows XP.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
My apologies to you Thomas. it has been a long weekend and I could have
been more complete in the question. I am sorting the data (ORDER BY) in
SQL, but .NET does not see the data coming in from the stream as ordered.
It is mostly sorted but there are some items out of order. I decided to
Oh, ok, sure; I am familiar with the task scheduler. I work in Windows
cluster job scheduling area; so I got confused there for a bit :)
Thomas Tomiczek wrote:
I would say he means the windows scheduler. This is apart of the
operating system, you know.
http://www.iopus.com/guides/winscheduler.htm
It's a puzzle to me what sort of mental state would trigger anyone being
so arrogant (and insulting) just because someone else has a bit of a
misconception about how things work and is therefore asking for help.
I can think of a few terms I usually associate with folks having such an
attitude,
And in return I will refrain from telling you loudly what I think of
people making posts such as yours.
Very nicely, clemens. One of the most arrogant posts I read in the last
weeks here.
I was not insulting at all. All I did point oout is that someone had not
done his homework (but came to an
Now, this is a totally different topic, obviously.
Ok, so you basically found out that that there are issues with the sort
order. This is actually a problem I stubmeld into some time ago - the
SQL sort orders are not per definition correct when you compare them
to the .net locales. I think this
Thank you for brilliantly supporting my point.
-cv
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Tomiczek
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order
Actually if a table has a clustered index then the data is physically stored in
ascending or descending order of that clustered index in tha data pages. For example
the following table is ordered by ID as the primary clustered index of InventoryState.
CREATE TABLE [InventoryState] (
Here is a Windows Scheduler wrapper class in VB .NET. I am sure you can
convert it.
http://www.mvps.org/emorcillo/dotnet/shell/index.shtml
-Original Message-
From: Srihari Angaluri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Baudouin, Andrew
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
SQL Server
Right, he only
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
SQL Server
So what?
The
See, it does not say Lead developer Or something. So I assume you are
simply not responsible for handling personell. Which makes it clear
why you would not revmove someone without appropriate knoelsedsge from a
position he holds but lacks the knowledge to fullfill.
If I were in charge of
myDataReader = myCommand.ExecuteReader()
Dim myLastName As String =
Dim myCurrentName As String =
While myDataReader.Read
myCurrentName = myDataReader.GetString(0).Trim
myCompare = String.Compare(myLastName,
While I do agree that it is time to move on with this thread (or kill it entirely), I
must say that it is unfortunate that this conversation has taken a turn wherein
respondents feel it necessary to begin bashing another's country of origin. That is
quite childish.
The professional quality of
Okay - enough enough! Everyone just let it go. Even Jon is ignoring it and
just trying to learn what he can (umm about SQL, not about our friendly
little community)
julie
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
myDataReader = myCommand.ExecuteReader()
Dim myLastName As String =
Dim myCurrentName As String =
While myDataReader.Read
myCurrentName = myDataReader.GetString(0).Trim
myCompare =
I'd like to add that of all the people participating in this thread, a very low number
actually tried to answer the question(s). (2 or 3 to my knowledge)
You all may get offended when someone is less 'diplimatically correct' with saying
things, fact is that taking time to answer off-topic
Mr. Bouma,
You are completely correct. As I am one of the ones who replied, not to the question
at hand, but to the tone of an answer, I would like to offer my apologies to the
ENTIRE group. In the future, I will limit my posts to questions, and (if I get a whole
lot smarter) answers.
Again,
I will second that. Frans well done, brilliantly said.
Even though I didn't answer to either threads, on/off topic!
Regards,
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Snyder, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 July 2004 17:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort
From: Frans Bouma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and SQL Server
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:44 +0200
myDataReader =
OK guys, thanks for bringing this under control a bit.
And there was me saying a couple of days ago that we stopped moderating this
list because we didn't feel it was necessary.
This is the first time AFAIK that this list has descended into a flame war
and I hope it will be the last. If that
I would really like to see a test app posted that reproduces this behavior. My best
guess is that the problem is due to lack of synchronization somewhere.
J. Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I'm surprised that the framework code doesn't
allocate a large block of (possibly unmanaged) memory to
We are using .NET Enterprise Architect 2003 with a Targetschema of IE5.
When the resulting pages are viewed with the latest version of Mozilla,
the appearance of the screens of Datalists are different than they are
with IE.
In IE, we see the use of the width attribute of the td tag accurrately
36 matches
Mail list logo
