http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/38dvh9/my_experience_with_observium_management/
Looks like Adam Armstrong after burning his bridges with all the WISPS went on
another irc rage. He ticked off another person not more than a month later.
He posted his chat logs to /r/networking in
And yet there seems to be some enjoying watching it and keeping it alive.
On Jun 4, 2015 7:29 PM, Steve li...@wavedirect.org wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/38dvh9/my_experience_with_observium_management/
Looks like Adam Armstrong after burning his bridges with all the
I like the guy. He doesnt stroke anybodys cock on stuff, If its not going
to happen, he says so, leaving zero chance that there is any
miscommunication of his intention.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Lewis Bergman lewis.berg...@gmail.com
wrote:
And yet there seems to be some enjoying
Hey folks. Looking at some 3.65/5GHz panels from IT Elite, the
SEC3.65XP/5D -- xpol 3.65, and standard dual-pol 5GHz.
Does anyone have any experience with this particular model?
Any feedback would be appreciated...
cheers,
Vlad
Because uric acid neutralizes the pathogens.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/4/2015 4:00 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
But it appears urinal cakes are also made from paradichlorobenzene,
why do they not require a warning? Because they are in little cages?
Absolutely not.
I want it to be effective when I choose to use it...
Uh... I mean, no, never, that's horrible.
- Original Message -
From: Lewis Bergman
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problems with Ants in Radios
I poison my
we got flagged on an insurance audit for not having msds. We didnt know we
had chemicals. The auditor didnt knw what chemicals we had, just that we
needed the msds sheets
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
Because uric acid neutralizes the pathogens.
bp
It's probably just 100meg. We got sent a bunch of these from Streakwave on
accident once.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Does this mean it's a GIGEAPC-HV or one of the 100 meg cards?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
444 is 100mbps only and it's compatible with canopy FSK/450 APs and epmp
On Thursday, June 4, 2015, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Does this mean it's a GIGEAPC-HV or one of the 100 meg cards?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
I did not know mothballs were poisonous. I guess grandma shouldn’t have let us
play with them in her closet.
What about urinal cakes, should I tell the employees to stop eating those?
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problems
But it appears urinal cakes are also made from paradichlorobenzene, why do they
not require a warning? Because they are in little cages?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urinal_deodorizer_block
From: Daniel White
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 5:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
Does this mean it's a GIGEAPC-HV or one of the 100 meg cards?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
I’d be worried about OSHA and having MSDS sheets on file.
Mothballs could be the same situation.
Poison in any form seems like an unnecessary risk to your employees and company.
Daniel White
(303) 746-3590
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent:
What if you put a warning label on a tupperware box with mothballs? Are
you in the clear?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel White afmu...@gmail.com wrote:
I’d be worried about OSHA and having
I poison my employees on a regular basis. Doesn't everyone? It build their
tolerance.
On Jun 4, 2015 4:10 PM, Daniel White afmu...@gmail.com wrote:
I’d be worried about OSHA and having MSDS sheets on file.
Mothballs could be the same situation.
Poison in any form seems like an
Awesome thanks Sean.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote:
444 is 100mbps only and it's compatible with canopy FSK/450 APs and epmp
On Thursday, June 4, 2015, Josh
Everything 2.4 ePMP and/or ITelite seems to very meh. The enclosures
aren't bad but I'm getting better signal penetration with 5.1 than 2.4 on
ITelite antennas.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:35 PM,
I've been ordering the GIGE ones but I'm not sure if they're labeled as
such. Does anyone have a picture they can confirm works with gig?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Josh Baird
By no means am I an OSHA or MSDS expert. More or less just pointing out
something that could be a concern.
OSHA only applies to the workplace though… so just keep your mothballs at home
:-D
Daniel White
(303) 746-3590
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
The PTP450 is just an SM. Does it even support powering the UGPS? I
don't know, I don't have any PTP450s.
On 6/4/2015 10:55 AM, Matt wrote:
Right now for PTP450 we are using parasitic syncpipe. Creates more
connections to fail though. I would really like just the RJ11 plug
from syncpipe to
Anyfing u wnnt
On Jun 4, 2015 3:39 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:Given Steves reputation, Im not sure what were talking about re: $46 for 20 holes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
I've never seen a J-mount that I would trust to hold an AF24... does anyone
make a tall 2 J-mount?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
The biggest one is the DS-3000. But holding an AirFiber24, I doubt it
unless you have lots of reinforcement and you use
Yep me too, I have a few poignant questions.
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
If you discover you are Jesus, I want to schedule a performance
review.
*From:* That One Guy /sarcasm
Hahahahahahaha
On Jun 4, 2015 5:00 AM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Running into a strange problem with LinkPlanner. I have a couple of
exisitng 5GHz links I'm looking at replacing with a licensed solution -
one of which is about 27 miles.
According to LinkPlanner
+1
I use stuff like that around the house..
On 06/04/2015 11:59 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
granular poison
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies
m...@mailmt.com mailto:m...@mailmt.com wrote:
Ryan,
I've
PTP450 only supports timing via the timing port. What we've done with
them is a dedicated SyncPipe Parasitic.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/4/2015 11:37 AM, George Skorup wrote:
The PTP450 is just an SM. Does it even support powering the UGPS? I
don't know, I don't have any PTP450s.
On
Any experiences using the new IT Elite cPAT24019dual 19 dBi panel with ePMP?
Thanks - Chris
That is the beauty of the West.
Actually in many cases 11GHz outperforms 6GHz out here. Rain fade is low, so
multipath fading is the bigger concern.
Once you hit Central USA (say East of the Rockies) rain fade increases to the
point that is no longer true most of the time.
I apologize for the third email, I am still figuring out posting on the
Animal Farm list! We are having problems with ants taking up a nest inside
of our radios, has anyone come across a good solution of sealing the
antennas up to keep them out? I attached a picture to this message since it
was
Right now for PTP450 we are using parasitic syncpipe. Creates more
connections to fail though. I would really like just the RJ11 plug
from syncpipe to radio. Maybe he could even down size the pipe
itself.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM, George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
I asked Forrest
We are having problems with ants taking up a nest inside of our radios, has
anyone come across a good solution of sealing the antennas up to keep them
out? I attached a picture to this message since it was not coming up
correctly embedded in the email. I know that we can get some ant spray to
If you discover you are Jesus, I want to schedule a performance review.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:07 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
Ive been growing my hair to find out if Im jesus or not. If it turns
Just an idea. We are using about 3 of these a week and expect to increase that
to about 5 shortly.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 9:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
In
You can always ask yourself “What would that One Guy Steve do?”
Maybe get a WWTOGSD bumper sticker or tshirt.
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:12 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
If you discover you are Jesus, I want to
The only part that they could really bother is the copper port. Put some
dielectric grease in there maybe?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Ryan bearma...@fourway.net wrote:
I apologize for the
Thanks for all of the suggestions, I am going to look them all over and start
trying them this week! Ants are definitely our biggest problem due to mounting
antennas on poles in trees.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 12:29 PM
are you getting the connectorized performance gains within fcc eirp? Ive
come to find a good majority of field test results are invalid solely
because the tests are not performed legally
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:
On the SM side, we did not try
Ive been growing my hair to find out if Im jesus or not. If it turns out I
am, I will put that on my list after getting a robe and sandals
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
In theory I can, but just have to strengthen my faith about 5% more
*From:*
Ryan,
I've heard a mothball would work. The well guys do taht around here
to keep them out of the well controllers. We are going to start
trying in with our outdoor fiber units. Not sure if it will
interact with the plastic.
--
Best regards,
Mark
Dielectric grease works, I was going to recommend Vasoline on the entrance,
around the inside and on the cable right where it enters.
We've got Argentine ants here. We have to go as far as putting automotive
grease on electrical lines coming in, lines run to lamp posts, network cable,
coax,
We are having problems with ants taking up a nest inside of our radios, has
anyone come across a good solution of sealing the antennas up to keep them
out? This is what we are dealing with:
Ryan
Fourway.net
I wonder if we can move the Rockies...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Daniel White afmu...@gmail.com wrote:
That is the beauty of the West.
Actually in many cases 11GHz outperforms 6GHz out
Not loading for me
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Ryan bearma...@fourway.net wrote:
We are having problems with ants taking up a nest inside of our radios,
has anyone come across a good solution
Got it.
Disabled Airsync.
- Original Message -
From: Glen Waldrop
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:56 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 Ti problem
I'm working with another WISP that is having an issue with a Rocket M5 Ti XW
hardware.
We've got Nanobridge
In theory I can, but just have to strengthen my faith about 5% more
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
I wonder if we can move the Rockies...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
I want that shirt!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
You can always ask yourself “What would that One Guy Steve do?”
Maybe get a WWTOGSD bumper sticker or
put mastic around the cable entry, will be pita to change radios, but youll
be changing radios less often
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
The only part that they could really bother is the copper port. Put some
dielectric grease in there maybe?
granular poison
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies m...@mailmt.com
wrote:
Ryan,
I've heard a mothball would work. The well guys do taht around here
to keep them out of the well controllers. We are going to
Actually, spray on belt dressing would probably do the trick and take less time
than grease. Assemble the unit, spray the entrance with belt dressing. It will
stay there for a long time, stay sticky and the ants generally will avoid it.
- Original Message -
From: Glen Waldrop
I'm working with another WISP that is having an issue with a Rocket M5 Ti XW
hardware.
We've got Nanobridge M5 for all other shots. We're getting 60-70Mbps through
each link. The Ti on tower 3 gets 60Mbps+, the Ti on tower 4 gets average of
12Mbps throughput. -54 signal, -104 noise, 270-300
Thats what I thought. We currently have outdoor grade Shireen STP-CAT5e to all APs.Looks like for this project, moving the 2/4s below the top, adding the surge arrestors at the top, and adding the aerial will help until we budget for a complete ( or 1 x 1) swap of cabling and ground straps for
On the SM side, we did not try connectorized 3.65 450 SMs.
In our past experience with 320s, the SMCs used with a KP Performance 3.65
feedhorn reflector got less results at times for NLOS shots then a standard SM.
It was explained to me that is because it’s not a “need more power, burn
In the interest of science, be interesting if you could include the number of
beers you have had prior to each email each day. I hypothesize that your
vocabulary and alcohol consumption have a certain correlation. Just a simple
number at the beginning or end. 7, 9, 18...
The high numbered
The drill doctor has a masonry bit mode. Although, I don't think they
need a super-sharp edge to work. It's like they mainly just beat there
way through the material.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/4/2015 5:01 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Rotary hammer bits have carbide tips and should do a lot
29 miles and 4 footers? Sweet!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote:
We have a 29 mile shot using 11ghz and 4 foot dishes. It's currently a
dragonwave but we are
Once upon a time, I was in a vo-tec program for tool and die makers that was a
feeder school for Boeing. One of our first subjects to study were twist
drills. There are multiple faces on a twist drill as relief areas called the
rake. Moreover the angle of the point varies with the material.
We have a 29 mile shot using 11ghz and 4 foot dishes. It's currently a
dragonwave but we are switching to SAF integra 2+0 gigabit link this
summer. Path calcs show four 9's+ uptime. We are in NW CO.
2 cents
On Thursday, June 4, 2015, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Paul,
Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side of
the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP. However, at the
SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS test using a connectorized radio with a higher
gain antenna. We’ve seen some initial NLOS tests where
The biggest one is the DS-3000. But holding an AirFiber24, I doubt it unless
you have lots of reinforcement and you use some kind of anchor glue at the
base. We use them with PowerBeam-400s but unless 4-5 bolts anchor really well,
we add at least 1 of the braces.
Rory
-Original
I avoid the list after drinking, that used to result in offlist spankings.
The tapered bits i should have clarified were the ones for a regular drill,
i hate that the one ring always dulls out. I was just professing my love
for the rotary hammer. I get to use mine in the basement this weekend to
Under the old rules - if I understand right, we'll eventually have to
register existing stuff with an SAS, but nothing has really changed for
now. You can keep operating under the old rules until some time in 2020.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:
OK, but
This particular site is solar and that's why I needed to power it with DC
using the GIGE-POE-APC
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015, Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.net wrote:
We start using the netonix miniswitches. We power them with the mimosa
brick and power mimosa/epmp/mikrotik with the switch.
OK, but under what rule set, for how long before you have to comply with the
new rules coming out?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:51 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
You can still add new 3.65 AP
I have slightly over 60TB of RAID5 storage on NAS’s at home that are replicated
to cloud storage offsite ;)
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 10:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18 USB drives on 1 computer
There's a
I know, but the UGPS is powered from the timing port from a 450 AP. Or
you can run it on its own dedicated power supply. What I don't know is
if the current SM hardware's timing port supports UGPS powering. I'm
remembering no for some reason, which is yet another reason why we said
screw the
Sorry, I've never used a UGPS, so I am not familiar with the details.
You should be able to find out by just plugging a UGPS into a vanilla
SM. I don't seem to recall any power supplied to the timing port?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/4/2015 11:59 AM, George Skorup wrote:
I know, but
I know, but the UGPS is powered from the timing port from a 450 AP. Or you
can run it on its own dedicated power supply. What I don't know is if the
current SM hardware's timing port supports UGPS powering. I'm remembering no
for some reason, which is yet another reason why we said screw the
Yep, there is. At least on the 450 hardware.
On 6/4/2015 2:11 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I don't seem to recall any power supplied to the timing port?
UGPS is around ~~ $235. Much more expensive than a SyncPipe. Is it
possible to run a SyncInjector from a UGPS? If you could, then you could
consolidate GPS timing into one unit. Right now we're using separate
SyncPipes for PTP450 and PMP450 that are on SyncInjectors (when colocated).
bp
So I have learned
;-)
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/4/2015 12:27 PM, George Skorup wrote:
Yep, there is. At least on the 450 hardware.
On 6/4/2015 2:11 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I don't seem to recall any power supplied to the timing port?
OK, I guess if it has UGPS power control in the GUI, then it works. Cool.
On 6/4/2015 2:21 PM, Matt wrote:
PTP230's and PTP450's both support UGPS, its right in config to enable
or disable it.
We had the exact same results. Bare SM worked better than reflector
through trees. And it actually worked pretty good, got about 24x7Mbps
linktests. That was until the trees started blowing in the wind,
linktests were all over the place. Then it got worse, the trees got wet
and the test SMs we
Should have specified: Superior Essex BBDGe with the copper clad steel
armor. That spec sheet includes unarmored cables also. You can get
similar products from Mohawk and Belden.
I've also never done it that way. For a lot of reasons I like rigid
metallic conduit up the tower. You can't
It'll be nice when everyone has SFPs...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015
You wouldn't use the ground kit with a foil shield. You'd get an
outside plant cable with armor on it.
Example: https://objects.eanixter.com/PD327279.PDF
On 6/4/2015 12:31 AM, Edward Brooks wrote:
How does it go on without nicking that thin foil? Is there a tool for
the Cat5? I looked at the
Rotary hammer bits have carbide tips and should do a lot more than 20 holes. I
don’t resharpen them but it should be possible.
The downside is they are really poor at going through wood or any material
other than masonry, you need to switch to a regular bit for that.
Even in a hammer drill,
Given Steve's reputation, I'm not sure what we're talking about re: $46 for 20
holes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
+1000 on everything in your second paragraph.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:30 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Static Nearby Lightning Issues
Should have specified: Superior Essex BBDGe with the copper clad steel armor.
That spec sheet includes unarmored cables
Where is the best place to get tall J-Mounts that can hold an AirFiber 24 or a
full height sector? I don't need them in quantity, just a few for now. I got
some 25 ones from Streakwave, but they are too short for a full height sector
and I don't know how much I trust them to hold an AirFiber
Doesn't the 820 bond channels and such? I guess two 80s for that kind of
throughput?
27 miles is going to be 6 footers in 6 GHz. You need a certain threshold
of uptime for licenses.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 4, 2015
What antenna are you using in your testing of the 450 vs. 320 NLOS? I’m just
curious because this is an interesting report, as we have a network of around
2,500 320 customers, and we are in the same position of looking for that next
great thing.
Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell
You can specify channel size and 1+0, 2+0 etc in the link description.
Also LinkPlanner lists the minimum uptime threshold and if you fail to
meet it the link becomes red.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 6/4/2015 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Doesn't the 820 bond
Hey guys,
Running into a strange problem with LinkPlanner. I have a couple of
exisitng 5GHz links I'm looking at replacing with a licensed solution -
one of which is about 27 miles.
According to LinkPlanner this shot should be no problem (granted not
with more than 3 9s of uptime, which is
I would guess that SAF's calculations are based on Vigants-Barnett and your
LinkPlanner results used ITU-R. You can toggle LinkPlanner to Vigants-Barnett
in the Project Properties window.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory McCann
Sent: Thursday,
An assertion made on the forum by somebody from Cambium was that the 450
in 3.65ghz wouldn't hit as many of the hard to reach places as the 320
did, but that you would end up with higher throughput on the ones that
did work.
On 6/4/2015 9:10 AM, Ben Royer wrote:
What antenna are you using
Rory,
Sometimes our engineers in Latvia are not the best at communicating
expectations. Of course with no fade, our equipment, just like any other
manufacturers, will deliver max capacity. The question is one of availability.
We don't engineer three 9's links unless specifically told to, and
Right but you also need to specific capacity, which is a common error I see in
LinkPlanner files sent to me.
I suspect we are not comparing 1024QAM modulation to 1024QAM modulation.
Josh is also right. 6GHz and 11GHz have uptime requirements that have to be
met along with utilization
Ben,
The testing was based on using the standard Cambium antenna, respectively, for
both platforms.
Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ben Royer
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
What antenna are you
Were you using a reflector on the 450SM?
On 6/4/2015 9:30 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
Ben,
The testing was based on using the standard Cambium antenna,
respectively, for both platforms.
Paul
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ben Royer
*Sent:* Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:11
With or without…. Made like difference. Sometimes the reflector made no
different and on occasion made it worse depending on the densities of the trees.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:36 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
I want to clarify… ALL of my statements regarding the 450 or discussion of the
320 in these scenarios is for challenging NLOS environments. For those using
3.65 simply because it is a cleaner spectrum, the 450 is a clear winner.
Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul
91 matches
Mail list logo