Re: [AFMUG] Looking for waveguide parts

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
You need a circular waveguide to N connector transition (assuming you want to feed with coax). The waveguide need to taper to the bottom of the horn. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:54 PM To: af@afmug.com ; memb...@wispa.org Subject: [AFMUG]

[AFMUG] surplus NB5-22's

2018-04-24 Thread Peter Kranz
I have tons of world NB5-22's left over from an old project (150+), is anyone on here still deploying these and want them? Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com

Re: [AFMUG] Looking for waveguide parts

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
If you can't find them let me know. I can make them. Not saying in which century I will get around to it... -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 2:47 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for waveguide parts Looks like we'll be able to

Re: [AFMUG] Looking for waveguide parts

2018-04-24 Thread George Skorup
Looks like we'll be able to get a pair of original Western Electric's. They're WR-159 flanges, so we'll either need a 159 to 137 transition, or 159 and 137 to type N adapters and coax in between. I'd prefer to find some transitions and avoid the coax. On 4/24/2018 3:18 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Adam Moffett
We're digressing quite a bit here, but at the end of the day the government skims money from one part of the economy and injects it into another part of the economy and colloquially we call that a "Tax". Let politicians spin it however they want. Calling it "Mandatory Contribution" is just

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
That is a ref to Mixed Use Private Lines there is no ref to "internet" FWIW, Transport has been subject to USF & Communication Taxes So if one is purchasing Transport + DIA separately, then yes they can be subject to paying USF Recovery Fees. and Yes, if you are selling Transport to a

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread Jaime Solorza
I just video last week..how much are they? Jaime Solorza On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 11:45 AM Joshua Heide wrote: > Wanted to see if anyone had any experience using these alignment tools? If > so would you recommend this product over others brands out there? besides > the

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Not sure where you are getting that from Words are important, because they mean something. USF is defined as a 'Mandatory Contribution' (obligation on Telco/Carriers/ISP's) to the USAC Fund, mandated/ managed by the FCC. It is not defined as a TAX.

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
I am sorry, I am not being sarcastic, nor discussing semantics, however the devil is in the details. for a proper answer to your question, the identification of who and what is important. >>> The FCC has defined all internet traffic as interstate and a source of USF >>> contributions. When

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Don't get me started on USF.. Chuck will take offense :) I agree colloguially it is a 'Tax'... however if you were speaking from a legal perspective, it is not (Why ? it is against Federal & State law for any entity other then a Gov entity to Collect tax, you and I can be their agents to

[AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread Joshua Heide
Wanted to see if anyone had any experience using these alignment tools? If so would you recommend this product over others brands out there? besides the buying new directly from the manufacturer is there another good place to buy one or find a used one? Thanks for the help! Josh

[AFMUG] Looking for waveguide parts

2018-04-24 Thread George Skorup
Anybody got or can get their hands on some 6GHz combiners? Looking to do a dual-pol ~20 mile path with existing KS15676 horns at both ends. Looks like one side is completely stripped and the other side is still set up for 4GHz.

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
>>>My current issue is, we own transport, we buy big DIA. >>>We also transport to others and we give them access to/sell DIA. Your own transport for internal use.. would not be subject to USFC selling DIA (regardless of how you transport it) would not be subject to USFC (we are assuming that

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
$15K One of my sons worked on doing something similar all last summer. He ran out of time before we finished it. We got down to about 1 degree azimuth accuracy. Maybe we will finish it someday. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 11:50 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread Joshua Heide
for one its $10k On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > I just video last week..how much are they? > > Jaime Solorza > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 11:45 AM Joshua Heide > wrote: > >> Wanted to see if anyone had any experience

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread Jaime Solorza
Yikes Jaime Solorza On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 11:52 AM Joshua Heide wrote: > for one its $10k > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Jaime Solorza > wrote: > >> I just video last week..how much are they? >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Tue, Apr

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Adam Moffett
>>> The FCC has defined all internet traffic as interstate and a source of USF contributions. When did that happen ? do you have an ref. please ? http://www.commlawgroup.com/news/1172-fcc-clarifies-usf-classification-revenue-mixed-use-private-lines Something changed about a year ago. I

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
Interstate jurisdiction has been applied to the internet from the earliest days. What is changing is contributions to the USF. “Contributions”, like for those contributing more than $25 they will give you a CD collection of the best of ABBA... Could be a “love offering” like show some love

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
My current issue is, we own transport, we buy big DIA. We also transport to others and we give them access to/sell DIA. They sell ISP service to end users. We need to keep ourselves square with USAC, so we either have to “charge” the commercial customer (elect to recover) USF or they have to

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
Not huge if you consider most of the main lobes are that wide or wider, so just as long as you can get it close enough to tweak with signal levels, that is all you need. If you are thinking of a set it and forget it, a tenth of a degree would be needed for that. Depending on frequency and

[AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

2018-04-24 Thread Sterling Jacobson
So now I'm digging to this more to make sure I'm on the right track. ALL broadband/internet ISP providers are now classified Telecommunications providers and must file FCC 499a or 499q and pay USF if not de-minimus? Is this where we all stand now?

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

2018-04-24 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Just 477 The reclassification didn’t change the USF status of information services, and by the same token it’s repeal didn’t change it’s status. USF is based on voice service and some interstate data circuits. Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 > On

Re: [AFMUG] SunSight MW15

2018-04-24 Thread Josh Reynolds
Get it down to 5mil accuracy and then we are talking! :) 1deg is huge! On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:53 PM wrote: > $15K > > One of my sons worked on doing something similar all last summer. He ran > out of time before we finished it. We got down to about 1 degree azimuth >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

2018-04-24 Thread Sterling Jacobson
Then why is my upstream provider charging me USF fee on my broadband only connection? From: Af On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing Just 477 The reclassification didn’t change the

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

2018-04-24 Thread Sterling Jacobson
Ok, sorry, so I've been extremely busy this year and missed the fact that the FCC once again re-classified us in January 2018 as a Service Provider instead of a Telecommunications Provider. Therefor exempting us from filing 499A/Q and having to pay into the FUSF fund if we are only providing

[AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
Point to point Ethernet over fiber should not have to be charged for USF. But if you receive DIA/backbone over it it then qualifies? But if you charge your customers for USF then the DIA circuit should not be charged. Do I have this correct?

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
No ! Before we discuss this... You need to specify what perspective you are asking the question from ? Are you the Buyer ? or are you the Seller ? Are you Contributing to USF Fund directly to the FCC or are you a deminius entity ? No One is allowed under the Law to "Charge" USF. Only

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread chuck
Not going to discuss semantics here Faisal. Just mechanics. Someone pays. Somebody files 499s. Someone is on record with USAC. The FCC has defined all internet traffic as interstate and a source of USF contributions. It was not always like this. If you file a 499 worksheet with USAC or

Re: [AFMUG] USF

2018-04-24 Thread Bill Prince
That is rich. So a telecom is not allowed to charge for USF, but they can charge a USF recovery fee. I fail to see the difference here. Sort of like Apple's "Overseas profits" of ~~ $225 billion. It was not actually "overseas", it was actually held here in the USA, but was merely labeled