a lake.
>> .433 psi per foot.
>>
>> From: Jaime Solorza
>> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:10 PM
>> To: Animal Farm
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
>>
>> You could use a stilling well with ultrasonic, or a submersible pressure,
>> yo
mug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Sent: 2/17/2018 3:34:26 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
Still well helps keep it more confined and precise... except in storm
well where turbulence wreaks havoc on it. Shake rattle and roll...
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 17, 2018 1:22 PM, <c
e used submersible pressure on municipal water tank telemetry many
> times.
> I guess it would work equally well in a lake.
> .433 psi per foot.
>
> From: Jaime Solorza
> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:10 PM
> To: Animal Farm
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitorin
I have a pressure sensor coming.
will try connecting it to a sitemonitor..
Roland
> I have used submersible pressure on municipal water tank telemetry many times.I guess it would work equally well in a lake..433 psi per foot.From: Jaime SolorzaSent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:10 PMTo:
...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark feet and inches on a pier and point a camera at it. :)
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
> Sent: 2/17/2018 3:34:26 PM
> Subj
Mark feet and inches on a pier and point a camera at it. :)
-- Original Message --
From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 2/17/2018 3:34:26 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
Still well helps k
s.
> I guess it would work equally well in a lake.
> .433 psi per foot.
>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:10 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
>
> You could use a stilling well with ultrasonic, or
I have used submersible pressure on municipal water tank telemetry many times.
I guess it would work equally well in a lake.
.433 psi per foot.
From: Jaime Solorza
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:10 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
You could use
You could use a stilling well with ultrasonic, or a submersible pressure,
you could do a capacitance probe
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 17, 2018 9:12 AM, "Mitch Koep" wrote:
> I saw a system that used the same system for Water tower level measuring
>
> Installed a screened culvert
I saw a system that used the same system for Water tower level measuring
Installed a screened culvert vertical, about two feet off the bottom to
stop
wave action and device float inside the culvert and a PLC controller
with a radio link
It seemed to work very well
You might want to check
To: afmug
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
I was hoping I could just put a syncpipe in a bag & use the gps for
elevation.
might not last very long or be very accurate.
Roland
Hmmm. Many of those monitoring stations have a culvert installed
vertically
to stop wave action.
Not
vert. I have used
ultrasonic sensors to measure water levels in a water tank before.
-Original Message-
From: Roland Houin
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 2:51 PM
To: afmug
Subject: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
I have a customer needing to monitor lake levels
need accurate method (gps ho
Look into the cambiumnetworks LongReach product for the communication piece.
On 02/16/2018 03:51 PM, Roland Houin wrote:
I have a customer needing to monitor lake levels
need accurate method (gps hopefully) to measure level above msl.
Anybody have any suggestions?
Roland Houin
Fourway.Net
: Friday, February 16, 2018 2:51 PM
To: afmug
Subject: [AFMUG] Lake level monitoring
I have a customer needing to monitor lake levels
need accurate method (gps hopefully) to measure level above msl.
Anybody have any suggestions?
Roland Houin
Fourway.Net
I have a customer needing to monitor lake levels
need accurate method (gps hopefully) to measure level above msl.
Anybody have any suggestions?
Roland Houin
Fourway.Net
15 matches
Mail list logo