Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

nktechs.net > > Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Monday, January 15, 2018 2:

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

half Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 2:01 PM To: af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput It looks like Mikrotik supports several different types of bonding, some of which appear to support asymmetrical li

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

rages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Monday, January 15, 2018 2:01 PM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> >

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 2:01 PM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput It looks like Mikrotik supports several different types of bonding, some of which appear to support asym

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

It looks like Mikrotik supports several different types of bonding, some of which appear to support asymmetrical links. I just started looking into this stuff myself, so I really don't know what I'm talking about... I'm currently just using OSPF to load balance a couple of links, and I'm trying to

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

so what options do I have here/ we are currently bench testing lacp in HP switches to get moving, but need a longer term better solution On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > im not being argumentative btw, im outside my scope, just showing my data >

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

im not being argumentative btw, im outside my scope, just showing my data sources. I honestly dont know what to do here. If a contractor here wants to offer some services, i have that budget as well. Im not certain our usual contractor will give me what i need... and butch doesnt answer my

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=110400 If Im reading the mikrotik guy (MRZ) response correctly. mikrotik will balance a single stream across multiple ports I put my comprehension at a 10% reliability, so On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Josh Baird wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

You will have the same limitation using LACP. > On Jan 12, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > that will limit single stream to single port speed, will it not? So I would > end up saturating one link while not using the other if a single stream were > to get

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

that will limit single stream to single port speed, will it not? So I would end up saturating one link while not using the other if a single stream were to get heavy? On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Don't try to do it at L2. Build it as

Re: [AFMUG] LACP or what for non symetric throughput

Don't try to do it at L2. Build it as router-to-router OSPF+BGP adjacency across the two separate Integra links. Build it as two OSPF /30 links and use OSPF cost to adjust traffic accordingly. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > So we will be