Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-05 Thread Steve Jones
powercode does this swimmingly, notification, portal monitoring, customers can set emails up to track usage, even free periods. content monitoring is the customers responsibility, that could be an add on service thats handed at the CPE router for a monthly fee On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM,

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-05 Thread Mark - Myakka Technologies
Title: Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing Cameron, +1 I think everyone should allow a customer to track usage regardless of UBB.  Our system uses PPPoE with radius accounting dumped in to a SQL database.  Usage is updated every 5 minutes or so.  Our web page shows current month and two previous

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-05 Thread Cameron Crum
The key to UBB is notification. Are you notifying them at certain thresholds? If not then you will be supporting it forever. Does you portal show past and current usage? Can customers choose their notification thresholds? Even better would be breaking down the traffic by web/video/gaming/email

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-05 Thread Dave
Lewis,  Yea, I know especially the issue with support on the platform now but I am talking to a 3rd party support element that is eager to help us with it. We are using freeside for this project. I mainly want to hit the high tier power users with a package for overage and slow down. This

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Steve Jones
this is similar to what we do as well, only the top tier actually has UBB. lets the customers who care granularly define their monthly cost, and those who just want consumption, costs be damned, do as they please. We have an unlisted tier we put heavy users on who are generating high bills, gives

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Mark - Myakka Technologies
Title: Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing Dave, As many of you know, we were a big fan of usage based billing on our wireless system.  We even implemented on our fiber side for the last 5 years.  It is a lot of work and does not scale well as you grow.  We found ourselves spending 2-3 full days

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Steve Jones
n Facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cal-Ore/205066716227707> > > __ > > *Cal-Ore* | *Real. Local. Trusted. Professional.* > > > > *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Wednesday, April

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Charles Boening
205066716227707> __ Cal-Ore | Real. Local. Trusted. Professional. From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 11:55 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing WellI pity you on your billing platform but I understand it.

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Lewis Bergman
WellI pity you on your billing platform but I understand it. I would look into using RADIUS. At least when I was doing it, it was well supported. I can't imagine Cambium would remove the functionality when it already worked. You have to make a number of entries into the config to allow the

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Dave
Hmm, ok..  We are moving everything towards radius soon anyways for a complete zero touch setup down to techs using tablets for final signature and payment on site.  I did not think of radius pulling that data but absolutely. We still use freeside for our billing CRM. Thanks Dave On

Re: [AFMUG] usage based billing

2018-04-04 Thread Lewis Bergman
Well, Are you taking about what to use for billing? There are a few that require edge boxes to monitor traffic. You could use RADIUS. We used to use that. Takes a bit to get it correct but MT supports sending periodic updates with byte counters to track usage. Your billing platform would have to