Maybe I am a bot. Beep.
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T251f13454e6192d4-M6d9db2f4c62c4fd55464177f
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
Usually, the acid test for this crow's nest of conjecture is a good whack in
the head. If it shouts "Ow!!!", it must surely exist. The end.
See why I suspect you of being a bot?
From: immortal.discover...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, 09 November 2019 22:04
To: AGI
There will often be loss in perceptual lossless for some humans. Some humans
see in the dark and some have hypersensitize hearing so the perceptual lossless
will be perceptual lossy to them. But it depends, do they want perceptual
lossless with unperceptual lossy or perceptual lossy with unperce
Poor analogy.
Suppose you receive a requirement from a customer, for a "lossy compressor,"
and you design them a compressor that delivers lossless results for some data
sets. No one will mind. You have met the requirement.
Suppose you receive a requirement from a customer, for a "lossless compr
Good one. It's all in my head and it's only me. Best way to cover up what I
said isn't it. That it's just me thinking it all. But I can think using what I
learnt. And what I learnt is what I see. It is that everything is matter and so
am I. I see my desktop right now, and part of my body, it's a
What? You finally figured out "I think, therefore I am," sort of? It's about
time.
I'm perfectly happy to consider myself to be a ghost, or observer, or whatever
you want to call it. I can't objectively measure/detect/verify the existence of
*any other* consciousness. I agree with Matt that fa
*I have something shocking to tell yous*. Strap your seat belt in. If the whole
universe is just a bunch of particles and everything is a machine made of
machines and nothing is alive or conscious and can all be moved, metaled,
squished, or rotated (as we do to hamburgers when they enter our mou
Again skipping the requirements straight to design. Exactly what problem
are you trying to solve?
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019, 10:07 AM Mike Archbold wrote:
> The abstract is a bit deflating. Why not take out "hobby"? If you're
> this serious I wouldn't call it a hobby maybe just say "early
> stage
On Thursday, November 07, 2019, at 1:30 PM, WriterOfMinds wrote:
>> Re: John Rose: "It might be effectively lossless it’s not guaranteed to be
>> lossy."
> True. But I think the usual procedure is that unless the algorithm guarantees
> losslessness, you treat the compressed output as lossy. Loss
Perhaps we need definitions of stupidity. With all artificial intelligence
there is artificial stupidity? Take the diff and correlate to bliss
(ignorance). Blue pill me baby. Consumes less watts. More efficient? But
survival is negentropy. So knowledge is potential energy. Causal entropic force?
On Thursday, November 07, 2019, at 11:34 PM, immortal.discoveries wrote:
> "consciousness" isn't a real thing and can't be tested in a lab...
hm... I don't know. It's kind of like doing generalized principle component
analysis on white noise. Something has to do it. Something has to do the
c
The abstract is a bit deflating. Why not take out "hobby"? If you're
this serious I wouldn't call it a hobby maybe just say "early
stages... embryonic... first milestone" etc. Mike A
On 11/9/19, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to submit the draft
> http://staryn
That worm coming out of the cricket was cringeworthy. Cymothoa exigua is
another.
It’s not the worm’s fault though it’s just living it’s joyful and pleasureful
life to the fullest. And the cricket is being open and submissive.
I think there are nonphysical parasites that effect human beings...
> Philosophy is arguing about the meanings of words.
For me, the great lesson of philosophy is that any
language that is general enough to express all the
ideas we need to express is able to express questions
that do not have answers. For example, "Is there a god?"
This may be related to the fact
On 2019-11-08 15:58:PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
You can choose to model I/O peripherals as either part of the agent or
part of the environment. Likewise for an input delay line. In one case
it lowers intelligence and in the other case it doesn't.
Thinking about it in computer science terms blurs t
On 2019-11-08 17:53:PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> we can approximate reward as dollars per hour over a set of
> real environments of practical value. In that case, it does
> matter how well you can see, hear, walk, and lift heavy objects.
> Whether you think that's fair or not, it matters for AGI too
On 2019-11-08 20:34:PM, rounce...@hotmail.com wrote:
The thing about the adversary controlling the environment around the
agent, his brain is working with the same physics as your feet
hitting the floor, but its not simulatable in a physics system,
because its not mechanical to start with, bu
Hello all,
I would like to submit the draft
http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/refpersys-design.pdf to arxiv.
Basile Starynkevitch requests your endorsement to submit an article to
the cs.AI section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not)
like to endorse this person, please visit th
I use rational in the sense of being reasonable. To me, the phrase: "It stands
to reason." = "It seems rational."
The difference between my version of 'rational' and your version seems rather
odd to me too. Being rational is not being sentient. An animal- when acting
outside the scope of its in
19 matches
Mail list logo
