On 5/7/08, Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Story: I recently attended an SGI Buddhist meeting with a friend who was a
member there. After listening to their discussions, I asked if there was
anyone there (from ~30 people) who had ever found themselves in a position of
having to
Matt,
On 5/6/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have played tournament chess. However, when faced with a REALLY
GREAT
chess player (e.g. national champion), as I have had the pleasure of
on a
couple of occasions, they at first
Kaj,
On 5/6/08, Kaj Sotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly a rational AGI may find it useful to appear irrational, but
that doesn't change the conclusion that it'll want to think rationally
at the bottom, does it?
The concept of rationality contains a large social component. For example,
On 5/7/08, Kaj Sotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly a rational AGI may find it useful to appear irrational, but
that doesn't change the conclusion that it'll want to think rationally
at the bottom, does it?
Oh - and see also http://www.saunalahti.fi/~tspro1/reasons.html ,
especially
This might be of interest.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=911
The ability to discover patterns, especially from partial information,
would seem to be a central concern of AGI.
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Steve Richfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/6/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As your example illustrates, a higher intelligence will appear to be
irrational, but you cannot conclude from this that irrationality
implies intelligence.
Neither
Is there any standard (even informal) way of representing NL sentences in logic?
Especially complex sentences like John eat spaghetti with a fork or
The dog that chased the cat jumped over the fence. etc.
I have my own way of translating those sentences, but having a
standard would be much
--- YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any standard (even informal) way of representing NL sentences
in logic?
No. But it hasn't stopped people from trying.
The meaning of sentences and even paragraphs depends on context that is
not captured in logic. Consider the
Bob Mottram wrote:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=911
The ability to discover patterns, especially from partial information,
would seem to be a central concern of AGI.
-
That was interesting. I may (actually) read the paper Hierarchical structure
and the prediction of
I believe that logic could work with general AI if it
was partially bounded and related to other partially bounded logical
models. That is, logical systems can be used to examine theoretical
(or theory-like relational) models of the IO data environment. However, the
possibility of creating a
Steve Richfield wrote:
...
have played tournament chess. However, when faced with a REALLY GREAT
chess player (e.g. national champion), as I have had the pleasure of
on a couple of occasions, they at first appear to play as novices,
making unusual and apparently stupid moves that I can't
On 5/7/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. But it hasn't stopped people from trying.
The meaning of sentences and even paragraphs depends on context that is
not captured in logic. Consider the following examples, where a different
word is emphasized in each case:
- I didn't
On 5/7/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my knowledge there is a standard style but there is of course no standard
ontology. Roughly the standard style is First Order Predicate Calculus
(FOPC) and within the linguistics community this is called logical form. For
reference see
YKY,
The Rus form is also a popular logical form, have you heard of it?
I think it is complete in the sense that all English (or NL) sentences
can be represented in it, but the drawback is that it's somewhat
indirect.
I have not heard about Rus form. Could you provide a link or reference?
On 5/7/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not heard about Rus form. Could you provide a link or reference?
This is one of the papers:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/22812/http:zSzzSzwww.seas.smu.eduzSz~vasilezSzictai2001.pdf/rus01high.pdf
you can find some examples
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
YKY : Logic can deal with almost everything, depending on how much effort
you put in it =)
LES sanglots longs. des violons. de l'automne.
Blessent mon cour d'une langueur monotone.
You don't just read those words, (and most words), you hear them. How's
logic going to hear them?
YOY YKY?
You
Ah mon dieu - c'est Blessent mon COEUR..
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
On 5/7/08, Stefan Pernar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What follows are wild speculations and grand pie-in-the-sky plans without
substance with a letter to investors attached. Oh, come on!
Um, people, is this list really the place for fielding personal insults?
For what it's worth, my two cents:
I happened to catch a program on National Geographic Channel today entitled
Accidental Genius. It was quite interesting from an AGI standpoint.
One of the researchers profiled has invented a device that, by sending
electromagnetic pulses through a person's skull to the appropriate spot in
the
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
