On 5 July 2012 05:19, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ: omd initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message.
Arguments: If this is judged TRUE, I will deregister.
You hippies with your non-Mac computers.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:48 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 5 July 2012 05:19, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ: omd initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message.
Arguments: If this is judged
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 09:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Did I *really* just come back from a weekend AFK and find out
that no-one wished Agora a happy 19th?
For shame.
Happy belated birthday, Agora.
At least this has given me an idea for some gameplay.
I feel that the reason for Agora's
ais523 wrote:
H. CotC Murphy, there's a feature that I'd find useful in your CotC
database that doesn't currently seem to be there: to show the most
recent 300 cases or so (regardless of other factors), without having to
load the entire list. I often don't particularly want to see the entire
Machiavelli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:
Honk.
I yell CREAMPUFF.
I've forgotten; what title does CREAMPUFF correspond to?
It's a meme left over from a B Nomic discussion, along the lines of
The clause in question
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 07:47 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
H. CotC Murphy, there's a feature that I'd find useful in your CotC
database that doesn't currently seem to be there: to show the most
recent 300 cases or so (regardless of other factors), without having to
load the
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 07:47 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
H. CotC Murphy, there's a feature that I'd find useful in your CotC
database that doesn't currently seem to be there: to show the most
recent 300 cases or so (regardless of other
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, ais523 wrote:
I had more fun
back in the era of Infinitely Accumulable Currency, and we haven't tried
anything even remotely similar since
Yes, let's do it again!
Yet, I acknowledge the intrinsic unfairness to
new players that such a system can bring (it never stopped
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:59 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
[When the rule was changed from being written in negatives to being
written in positives, the change in part (d) seems not to have taken De
Morgan's Law into account.]
Actually, it's not a typo. Part (d) was changed
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:00 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:59 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
[When the rule was changed from being written in negatives to being
written in positives, the change in part (d) seems not to have taken De
Morgan's Law
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Indeed; as it was, all the accused needed to be able to do was present
an argument that what they were doing was legal, and (d) would
exonerate them by virtue of them having an argument.
I don't think that was a bad
11 matches
Mail list logo
