DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BUS: Informal Reportor Report (per contract)

> On Nov 20, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Josh T wrote: > > I collect a reward of 5 Shinies for the quoted report, and if I > successfully had collected said reward, pay VJ Rada 5 Shinies as per > contract. Unfortunately, you did not, and therefore did not. My apologies for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

Ya I was just going to give myself a win and put Smash Mouth All Star in the ruleset for a while for that exact reason: an absurd dictatorship would be disastrous at this point. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Rewards

> On Nov 19, 2017, at 11:40 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On the off chance that this works, I claim a 5 shiny reward from Agora > for my Promotor report. Close! But Agora had four shinies, not five. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > >>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > >> to > >>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. > >> which is

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

>AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. >to > 6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. >which is obvious nonsense. DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again. Alright show's over boys

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJs 3599-3601 assigned to o

On Nov 19, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> AP-CFJ: "If a proposal specifies an amendment to a rule consisting of >> multiple parts, one of which is a title change, then the entire amendment >> fails." > > This is CFJ 3599. > > >> Shiny-CFJ: "If a proposal

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (Unofficial) FLR COE

I missed it :( On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 21:07 Madeline wrote: > I said this ages ago and no one believed me! > > > On 2017-11-21 12:33, VJ Rada wrote: > > "Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0) > > Referee Accountability > > History: > > Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ"

DIS: Re: BUS: (Unofficial) FLR COE

I said this ages ago and no one believed me! On 2017-11-21 12:33, VJ Rada wrote: "Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0) Referee Accountability History: Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" (天火狐), Nov 06, 2017" Obviously, it was not enacted by that proposal. The actual rule "Poetry Duel

DIS: Re: BUS: (Unofficial) FLR COE

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 20:33 VJ Rada wrote: > "Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0) > Referee Accountability > History: > Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" (天火狐), Nov 06, > 2017" > > Obviously, it was not enacted by that proposal. The actual rule > "Poetry Duel

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

You shouldn't feel ashamed, it's just the rules. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:07 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Nope! The fine has to be levied. E can pay the money if e wants to pay > it, but that doesn't satisfy any obligation. There's only an > obligation to pay if the fine is levied.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

Nope! The fine has to be levied. E can pay the money if e wants to pay it, but that doesn't satisfy any obligation. There's only an obligation to pay if the fine is levied. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > If you want to pay it, you

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

If you want to pay it, you certainly can. V.J., you would mark it as paid then, right? -Aris On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM ATMunn wrote: > Huh. I somewhat feel like maybe players just missed it, but I guess I > shouldn't complain about not having to pay a fine. I

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

Huh. I somewhat feel like maybe players just missed it, but I guess I shouldn't complain about not having to pay a fine. I just don't like seeing it there in the Referee's report... On 11/20/2017 8:01 PM, VJ Rada wrote: Yes, the fines are forever unpaid. If Agora doesn't want you to pay the

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

Yes, the fines are forever unpaid. If Agora doesn't want you to pay the fine, you won't pay it. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:54 AM, ATMunn wrote: > (I forgot to mention that only one player supported the intent, me) > > > On 11/20/2017 7:53 PM, ATMunn wrote: >> >> 2

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

(I forgot to mention that only one player supported the intent, me) On 11/20/2017 7:53 PM, ATMunn wrote: 2 things: first of all, in my next ADoP report, should I just note this as one report or a report and a revision? Also, 14 days have passed since your intent to levy fines on me and

DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

2 things: first of all, in my next ADoP report, should I just note this as one report or a report and a revision? Also, 14 days have passed since your intent to levy fines on me and Alexis. Here's the problem: Rule 2506 states that "When a Blue Card is issued, as a penalty, within the next 7

DIS: Re: BUS: Herald election

Really nice to finally put back a requirement to track theses! (even if it's just a SHOULD) It's nobody's job now, a long time ago it used to be the Rulekeepor funnily enough: > The Rulekeepor shall retain a copy of each Thesis approved by > its Thesis Committee. On Mon, 20 Nov

DIS: Re: BUS: Green Card to 天火狐

darnit, I was just about to point my finger at em. :P On 11/20/2017 7:13 PM, VJ Rada wrote: I issue 天火狐 a Green Card by Summary Judgement for not publishing a Reportor report last week. This would be a green card anyway, but note the mitigating circumstance: I agreed to write eir reports.

Re: DIS: Become Herald!

I was honestly pretty tempted to, but about to become Clork and that seems hectic enough :P On 2017-11-21 03:10, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: Office Holder Since Last Election

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report: 2017-11-20 (now with event logs!)

I contracted to do it (or not to do it, but to informally do it and have Fire-Fox publish it). On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:50 AM, ATMunn wrote: > How is it your fault? > > > On 11/20/2017 3:08 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> Reportor 天火狐 8 Days

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report: 2017-11-20 (now with event logs!)

How is it your fault? On 11/20/2017 3:08 PM, VJ Rada wrote: Reportor 天火狐 8 Days 2017-11-19 ​Oh god this is my fault isn't it. Oh dear.​ On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:39 AM, ATMunn wrote: You may notice that this week's ADoP report

Re: DIS: Become Herald!

I concur. It is easy to track and you get to dive into history. On 11/20/2017 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: >> Office Holder Since Last Election >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Herald election

I made great use of my campaign proposal. IDK what all these other scrubs are doing haha. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > You can see how it

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report: 2017-11-20 (now with event logs!)

>Reportor 天火狐 8 Days 2017-11-19 ​Oh god this is my fault isn't it. Oh dear.​ On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:39 AM, ATMunn wrote: > You may notice that this week's ADoP report looks a bit different! > > This is because I've done a little

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Herald election

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of > > economic policy: "if elected, I'll double the supply of land/halve > > the cost of pending proposals" or whatever (though if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Herald election

On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of > economic policy: "if elected, I'll double the supply of land/halve > the cost of pending proposals" or whatever (though if most of the > campaign proposals are like that,

DIS: Re: BUS: Herald election

Also, what is the point of campaign proposals? (Except for proposing overpowered powers for yourself and ensuring nobody else gets them) Seems like tying a proposal coming into force to your being elected will lower the chances of either happening; players who like one, but not the other are IMO

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Become Herald!

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > By announcement I make all players candidates. (this fails and does nothing)

Re: DIS: Become Herald!

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: > > Office Holder Since Last Election > > > - >

DIS: Become Herald!

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: > Office Holder Since Last Election > - > Herald VACANT 2017-11-17[4] Ongoing >

Re: DIS: PAoaM v3: Not rushed this time and also better in general

On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Reuben Staley > wrote: > > 1. every player with an amount of papers less than 2 an amount of > > papers so that eir paper balance is equal to 2. > > > > [ This makes it so that

Re: DIS: PAoaM v3: Not rushed this time and also better in general

On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > My main motivation - we've literally spent the last few months on shiny > > bugs, ironed many out, and I'm just paranoid about going through such > > a thing again. It's

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report: 2017-11-20 (now with event logs!)

I think that's what I had it at before, but a few people said they preferred this way. I'm not sure what the majority of people actually want. :P On 11/20/2017 9:44 AM, Madeline wrote: This looks pretty cool :D I think I prefer the consolidation number as a "diversity" percentage, but that's

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report: 2017-11-20 (now with event logs!)

This looks pretty cool :D I think I prefer the consolidation number as a "diversity" percentage, but that's just a minor quibble. On 2017-11-21 01:39, ATMunn wrote: You may notice that this week's ADoP report looks a bit different! This is because I've done a little bit of reformatting, and