Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> ===
> > 3467, called by ais523, 07 Nov 2016
> >
> > 天火狐 is a player.
>
> Judge's Evidence:
>
> Message sent to PF by
I figured it was fair game given that you had been posting recently, and I
wanted to test out the system. It works indeed.
天火狐
On 21 April 2017 at 23:04, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
Here is a proposed word list:
* Antegrian
* Borduria
* Catharsis
* Deteriorate
* Exemplify
* Fastidious
* Garner
* Heron
* Incorrigible
* Jambalaya
天火狐
On 16 August 2017 at 20:00, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Josh T <draconic
I like coming up with interesting wordlists. They're fun to compile and
evidently the result is reasonably well-received, although I think o is the
only person whose been on the receiving end of my lists.
天火狐
On 14 July 2017 at 00:58, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2017, at
I kind of prefer
fact x = foldl (*) 1 [1..x]
myself.
天火狐
On 16 July 2017 at 11:16, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> fun fact: i'm dumb
>>
>
> fun fact 0 = 1 | fact n = n * fact (n - 1)
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
While I haven't been paying attention to your scams of late due to real
life drama and bad timing (family issues; I'm flying to go be with them for
a month starting Thursday), I feel that your welcome with such tactics has
worn thin.
天火狐
On 10 July 2017 at 12:17, Cuddle Beam
I mean if I can buy the entire estate of Antegria for 50 cents, I think 10
cents a month is a lot.
天火狐
On 17 July 2017 at 22:50, Quazie wrote:
> If this CFJ is true then all officers work for a very low rate of ~10
> cents a month - which to me is bonkers.
>
> On Mon,
I'd be willing
> to mail out...
>
>
> -grok
>
> On Jul 17, 2017 9:55 PM, "Owen Jacobson" <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
> Indeed. What’s the price of bread?
>
> -o
>
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:54 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
Well. I suppose a nickel's worth of Shiny rounds to zero at that exchange
rate.
天火狐
On 18 July 2017 at 06:15, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Bam. Paid.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> (I don't think I should reveal any more, given that there's quite a bit of
> private data here,
CoE: Bayushi is a player (e owns Shinies)
天火狐
On 23 July 2017 at 16:10, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Accepted.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Nic Evans
I'm on vacation and only have mobile internet at the moment so I can't
check, but does the rule specify that the trust tokens needed to win are to
be issued by other players explicitly or that players can issue trust
tokens and one needs such tokens from multiple players? In the event of the
I'd just like to mention I haven't actually succeeded in making a
non-registration action in Japanese, and I think all my attempts at voting
in such were thrown out, which I believe is the correct way to interpret
the rules. (While there are technical and cryptographic differences, using
another
CFJ]
天火狐
On Jul 20, 2017 16:43, "grok (caleb vines)" <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm on vacation and only have mobile internet at the moment so I can't
> > check, but
Re: Japanese pledge: Given that I don't recall having made a pledge in
Japanese, I haven't the foggiest what it might refer to.
Re: Japanese Organization: Yeah, no, that's what I expected of it. I have a
long philosophical experiment, I swear.
天火狐
On 20 July 2017 at 23:58, Owen Jacobson
The only thing I have to remark about this is the self-demonstrating
statement: "šumma našpartam rāqtam ašpur, mimma epēšū?"
天火狐
On 28 June 2017 at 02:54, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 22:05 +0100, V.J Rada wrote:
> > I CFJ on the statement
> > "The
The set of languages which I speak fluently is smaller than what people
might expect, but I am willing to curl up with a grammar book of many
languages to dabble, of which I have done so with many.
天火狐
On 29 June 2017 at 10:31, V.J Rada wrote:
> I am purely English speaking
I'm going to be honest, I am pretty surprised that you all let me get away
with most of what I've done in Japanese.
天火狐
On 29 June 2017 at 12:07, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > I register.
> >
> > H.
I do apologize that it has come to this. For what it's worth, I sympathize
with your point of view and I do think that your CFJ was brilliant, even if
I didn't exactly have time to submit a gratuitous argument to support you.
天火狐
(Apparently, that Japanese character guy)
On 29 June 2017 at
@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the interest of watching everyone figure out what is going on, I
> acknowledge all of those concerns, and pledge to answer questions published
> in a-b b
While I am not a programmer that has needed to deal with
internationalization, it is to my understanding from friends in the field
that most implementations get it wrong, and thus how any one program
renders it should not be taken as evidence one way or another. For example,
I don't know for
I just wanted to mention that I have an alternate stamp proposal which I
haven't quite had the time to flesh out, but it should be reasonably easy
to change to if I write things carefully.
天火狐
On 30 June 2017 at 09:45, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com>
> And finally, I learned about the difference between traditional
(tategaki)
and modern (yokogaki) ordering in Japanese today! I'd always wondered
why
I was confused about that (looking at Japanese text from different
sources)
but never got around to looking it up. So thanks for
That's pretty good, actually. It's transliterated Neo-Akkadian for "If I
were to send meaningless messages, would it do anything?"
I have an interpretation of the rules. Instead of debating about it, I
think it is much more interesting to do things that test it and see what
Agora decides. I feel
I'd like to point out that the charter of 蘭亭社 was updated last month, which
includes additional definitions.
天火狐
On 27 June 2017 at 17:48, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I knew CFJ 3492 was a slippery
I would like to point out that I am not an office (in the recent events
section of the report).
天火狐
On 25 April 2017 at 23:05, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Secretary's Weekly Report
>
> Date of this report: Sun, 23 Apr 2017
> Date of last report: Sun, 29 Jan 2017
>
>
> Recent
I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification on the
issue.
天火狐
On 27 April 2017 at 00:27, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I CFJ, barring 天火狐, on the statement
>
> 蘭亭社's highest allowable budget for a single player is 50.
>
> I present no arguments,
The issue here as I see it is predicate level: there is a stage-level
interpretation and an individual-level interpretation. The individual-level
interpretation is that the adjective applies to the modified noun
intrinsically, that is, "the responsible people" at the individual-level
refers to
I barred you: I’m actually
> trying to figure out how Agora as a whole interprets the 蘭亭社 charter.
> Having you step in and answer directly somewhat defeats the purpose.
>
> -o
>
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This sounds
Can I come up with a wordlist to card you for tardiness?
天火狐
On 16 August 2017 at 19:48, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> For each of the following, I point the finger at myself:
>
> * Failing to publish the Secretary’s monthly report for August 2017 in a
> timely fashion.
> * Failing
Random question: Is there a way to formalize the fact that I do not want my
name (as opposed to y nickname) to be an acceptable way to refer to me?
天火狐
n't think there exists any formal way.
>
> I pledge to not refer to 天火狐 as Josh or Josh T.
>
>
> On 05/15/17 00:54, Josh T wrote:
> > Random question: Is there a way to formalize the fact that I do not
> > want my name (as opposed to y nickname) to be an acceptable way to
> > refer to me?
> >
> > 天火狐
>
>
>
Are we opening the mathematical can of worms here on Agora? Oh dear.
天火狐
On 19 June 2017 at 20:48, CuddleBeam wrote:
> Hr
>
> I pay Agora i (imaginary unit) shinies.
>
You know what, I can kind of see the argument for imaginary numbers being
reasonable. Quazie's remarks about personal balances being broken is still
a concern, and if it does actually go through it could be a little
inconvenient.
天火狐
On 19 June 2017 at 21:25, V.J Rada wrote:
I think I'm OK with supporting that interpretation.
天火狐
On 20 June 2017 at 16:09, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that saying "the unit of Balance
> > values is shiny" is suffi
On one hand, I'm kind of glad I don't have to try and explain what an
"algebraic integer" is to everyone since we can use the common-sense
ordinary-language definition of "integer" to mean "rational integer"; on
the other hand, I'm not convinced that saying "the unit of Balance values
is shiny" is
Here's a picture from my client for reference:
https://goo.gl/k21bMf
天火狐
On 22 May 2017 at 15:41, CuddleBeam wrote:
> I think that's a very good idea!
>
> When I read this on the archives or attempt to see the message in my gmail
> interface I see boxes instead of
That's right. Specifically, this is an agency that allows people to refer
to it by another name consequence-free.
天火狐
On 22 May 2017 at 15:39, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So this is an agency that allows you to refer to this agency?
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017
this year)
天火狐
On 23 May 2017 at 17:18, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note: Thanks for helping me test my script for unicode compliance -
> delighted that no changes were necessary to handle your unicode.
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM Josh T <draconicdark
The following information is for the future thesis writer about translation
and history of language on Agora:
反対 is both the verb "to oppose" or "to object" and a noun which can mean
"against" or "objection". On a Japanese ballot paper, the conventional
choices are 賛成 ("support") and 反対
> At the beginning of the game of Bing Bong each player SHALL pay the
organization 1 Shiny.
I object to being obliged to pay the organization 1 Shiny even if I do not
wish to partake in Bing Bong.
天火狐
On 24 May 2017 at 15:08, Quazie wrote:
> Proto Organization: 'Bing
of the budget system) than force all
Organizations to have a Shiny balance.
天火狐
On 24 May 2017 at 15:31, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:30 Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > At the beginning of the game of B
a better Good to not codify a potential
fallacy and have a clear opinion piece on the subject of ambiguity.
天火狐
On 26 May 2017 at 15:25, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> I think the judge's "additional argument" is actually all that's needed to
> find the CFJ
On my mail client, it's in reply to my motion to reconsider CFJ 3498
("Every statement is ambiguous") with two support.
天火狐
On 26 May 2017 at 15:45, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> What is this email in reference to?
>
> Publius
ribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On May 26, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On my mail client, it's in reply to my motion to reconsider CFJ 3498
> ("Every statement is ambiguous") with two support.
I also don't think the Principle of Explosion applies because DISMISS is an
option.
天火狐
On 26 May 2017 at 22:32, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> More like guidelines, and generally newer overrides older.
>
> On May 26, 2017 9:30 PM, "CuddleBeam" wrote:
>
If the incumbent thinks that someone else is better suited for the job, I
think they have the experience to make that decision.
天火狐
On 27 May 2017 at 21:43, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:13 PM Ørjan Johansen
To be fair, I think that having an important philosophical argument and
background on these recent issues is important, although I haven't
personally had the chance to read and go over them with a fine comb because
of real life, much less come up with a worthy response. However, with the
responses
Maybe also have something like "If a player X owns three grudges and for
each of those grudges the targets thereof also owns a grudge against the
player X, the {keeper of grudges} may place player X on Anger Management",
which would be a state that punishes a player a little.
Oh yeah, Grudges
> Question: should implications/citations be included in the case logs?
I think it would be a good idea to facilitate looking for things quickly.
天火狐
On 25 May 2017 at 05:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> [Comments on the below sections welcome. If this is liked, I invite
Bleach is good as a whitening and cleaning agent .
On a slightly more serious note, whitespace characters encompass quite the
number of characters aside from space, tab, and "enter" (which is a line
feed and/or a carriage return), including characters like "non-breaking
space", "ideographic
Nobody seems to mind when CFJ 3478 was presented with "I present no
arguments, largely out of spite" ;P.
I pledge to not object to nichdel should they wish to assign themselves the
below-quoted CFJs:
* "Agora need not be played in English."
* "Agora can be played in any language."
On 19 May 2017
> Unclear
Several dictionaries give a definition of this word to mean "ambiguous" or
"not easily understood", the latter of which is similar to "depends on
information which is unnecessarily difficult to determine", so I will
address those.
> Depends on information which is unreasonably difficult
I submit the following gratuitous argument:
* Rule 2461 "Death and Birth of Organizations" states that "When an
organization is created this way, its Charter is set to the value that e
specified, and the Budget switch for that player and Organization is set to
the Income Floor."
* Rule 2459
> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing
> document),
and existing solely because its backing document defines its existence.
So no organization can define and issue assets, for example?
> If an asset's backing document restricts its ownership to a class of
> A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for any
other person.
I think this should be changed to "A player CANNOT make any pledge that
would create new obligations for any other person or office, without the
other party's explicit consent."
天火狐
On 22 May 2017 at
Regardless if the Pink Slip is valid, I get the feeling that a Red Card of
some sort ought to be coming forthwith given the level of ire incited, but
my gauge on that front may be inaccurate. Personally, I think Gaelan should
not be trusted with the office of Rulekeepor, and should be removed from
I am willing to support reconsidering this CFJ on behalf of G. if there is
interest among the players for reconsideration.
天火狐
On 28 May 2017 at 21:18, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I'm just catching up to this CFJ now, and I have to say I'd consider
> this an example of
@Aris: Thank you for putting into words what I had been thinking while
reading over those of CuddleBeam's messages.
天火狐
On 28 May 2017 at 21:51, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 6:39 PM, CuddleBeam
> wrote:
> >
I would like to unofficially request that the proposal pool not be drained
until people get paid so that people can afford to pay the fees.
天火狐
On 28 May 2017 at 20:11, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> The following is a draft report. Note that it's not quite the same
I really shouldn't be making Agora actions at 5AM before going to bed when
I can't English anyways. I tend to forget basic things.
天火狐
On 2 June 2017 at 13:48, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > I retract any
> The previous provisions of this paragraph do not apply to an asset if the
organization is required to provided that asset in order to continue
existing.
I think there is a grammar mistake somewhere in that sentence, and if it
exists it should be fixed.
Aside from that, it looks OK.
天火狐
On
I understand that this isn't an actual report, but in the event are going
to think it is, my balance should be 15 Shinies after updating the values
with respect to my CoE in the prior report.
天火狐
On 15 June 2017 at 10:49, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Secretary's Weekly Report
>
Oh how nice of yourself. I was going to issue you a card for not responding
to my CoE [1] in a timely manner with the following apology list:
pagoda
palsy
parsimony
petrichor
petunia
picaresque
pigeon
piquant
praxsis
primeval
[1]
I vote as follows:
> 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6
AGAINST. I have expressed several concerns about this and Organizations
which have not been addressed to my satisfaction.
> 7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial UpdatesQuazie 6
I endorse ais529
I just wanted to mention that I approve of what you did with the apology
words. I hope you enjoyed writing them as much as I enjoyed coming up with
the word list.
天火狐
On 16 June 2017 at 02:37, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> SCENE: Outside a pagoda. An old man, shaken with palsy and
> I don’t think I can do anything about this, formally, since you’re still
not a player, but if you insist I can put together a theory under which
this should be carded.
CFJ 1709 states that non-players are still bound to contracts if they are
party to it, with the implication that non-players
I don't see how something like the following in the appropriate forum
wouldn't successfully give a card, assuming that it was issued in the right
time frame: "I issue Donald Trump a Green Card for breaking his pledge to
direct his secretary of the treasury to label China a currency manipulator."
> Which rule is authorizing the issuance of a card?
Rule 2450, where it says that breaking a pledge is a cardable offense.
I suppose "publicly-made" might be construed to mean "in a public forum",
which would prevent Donald Trump from getting a card. I can see the
argument as for why G. can't be
I am kind of legitimately curious how roujo's vote of "I submit a vote for
whoever 天火狐's vote currently counts for" in the election of ADoP has a
different vote result with 天火狐.
天火狐
On 9 June 2017 at 13:56, Quazie wrote:
> I resolve the Agoran Decisions of electing ADoP
@Gaelan: I have expressed a desire to not be referred to by my real name.
While there is nothing in the rules that prevents you from doing so, I
shall glare at you menacingly for ignore my wishes.
I have gotten the mailing list to accept 天火狐 as my name as of this message,
and if everything goes
nsive? (Eg. A player's first organization costs 5 Shinies, 2nd
organization costs 10, 3rd 20, etc.)
天火狐
On 24 May 2017 at 16:26, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/24/17 15:24, Nic Evans wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/24/17 15:03, Josh T wrote:
>
> > [...] to so
value as well.
天火狐
On 24 May 2017 at 15:51, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On a more serious note, the proposal says that the organization needs to
&
I support academic themeing as I think it would be an interesting change of
pace. Bonus fact: 蘭亭社 makes reference to a famous literati gathering which
had influenced Eastern art for centuries.
天火狐
On 25 May 2017 at 16:00, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
If this is the case, I have no problem supporting such a proposal.
天火狐
On 30 May 2017 at 14:26, Quazie wrote:
> So grok left, and that's a bummer, but it's especially a bummer for me,
> the Superintendent - I think his agency still exists... there's nothing in
> the rule
Sorry for not specifying in the text itself, but this is relevant to
gameplay because Gaelan (who, I believe is assigned this CFJ, numbered
3498, by ais523 [1]) is trying to question the validity of my amendment to
the charter of 蘭亭社 with "Translation between any two languages is
inherently
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > I do apologize if the formatting is wonky, there are some teething
> issues at present
> > and I hope to get it resolved by next week.
>
> Format looked perfect to me! (or if not "perfect", very readable). +1
> like overall.
>
>
>
The Japanese term for a (western) serf is *noudo*, literally meaning farm
servant. If you want something from the historical Japanese caste system,
since they took after Confucian ideas, peasant was was actually the highest
commoner class (above craftsmen and merchants); the outcasts of the
l.com> wrote:
> That's a conditional, which is totally different. G's here talking
> about an instant runoff ballot of
> 1. Jeff
> 2. PRESENT
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It sounds like having endorse or
It sounds like having endorse or PRESENT as the tail of a list of votes is
acceptable. This allows things like "I endorse A, unless eir vote indicates
preference for B, in which case my vote is PRESENT."
天火狐
On 14 September 2017 at 19:09, VJ Rada wrote:
> My current policy
We could use the Unicode collation algorithm, I guess. Your point is noted
however.
天火狐
On 14 September 2017 at 23:46, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe that
I believe that the term "alphabetical order" can be used to mean
"lexicographical order", of which increasing unicode codepoint values is a
naturalistic choice.
天火狐
On 14 September 2017 at 20:19, grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
> For reference: if you resolve that vote as
Here's two more:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-May/034600.html
(the one quoted directly in the link, and the one quoted by that message)
天火狐
On 14 September 2017 at 22:14, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM,
That sounds like fairly reasonable statistics. If someone writes out some
specific scenarios I suppose I'll take a look and do some number-crunching
when I am slightly less busy.
天火狐
On 23 September 2017 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It sounds like the kind of
and spits out "I Object." It's pretty much as clear a translation as you
> can get
> if you're going to allow that sort of thing at all.
>
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > I can't quite explain it. Could you be so kind as to enlighten me as to
> the meaning of thos
I have an idea for making goods which is bouncing around in my mind, but I
haven't the time to sit down and write it out. It'd also be my first
proposal, so I'm a bit apprehensive at throwing it out into the wild
without double-checking some basic things first.
天火狐
On 23 September 2017 at 19:01,
e:
>
>
> Thanks! If you were picking one, which would you pick? (And what's the
> singular
> version of that, does it match "is a Samurai" as both singular and plural)
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > The Japanese term for a (western) serf is *noudo*, li
I think that is a wise plan. I feel like I didn't do very much aside from
watch for the first six months I was playing (my organization
notwithstanding).
天火狐
On 22 September 2017 at 13:25, ATMunn . wrote:
> Thanks for the welcome package, whether it actually worked or
Oh dear, I guess I should prepare for this.
天火狐
On 15 October 2017 at 16:22, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I designate 天火狐 to be next week's Silly Person.
>
>
>
Alas, wordplay in Japanese does not
invoke quite the same type of afterthought.
天火狐
On 16 October 2017 at 12:30, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > About Silly proposals I am vexed:Of the rule's intention I am
About Silly proposals I am vexed:
Of the rule's intention I am perplexed;
Ought the proposal's mood be most merry,
Or it's meaning and tone be contrary?
天火狐
Oh well, I had fun writing my blurb. It was kind of hard to not use common
words like "the" or "of".
天火狐
On 9 September 2017 at 03:20, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 12:02 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> >
> > As Surveyor, it is my pleasure to
us Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I issue a Yellow Card to the Superintendent due to eir tardiness in
> publishing the September Monthly Agency
I actually messed up in one place: "certain" begins with an s sound so
shouldn't have been included. I'm glad you enjoyed it regardless though.
天火狐
On 9 September 2017 at 11:48, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 9, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Josh T <draco
Aw, I won't be able to keep / recreate 蘭亭社 under the new proposal. I'll
have to rethink how to test the things that should go with it should this
pass.
I would like to propose adding making CFJs as protected. I think the reason
thereof should be evident if one were party to a theoretical contract
I kind of like this idea, and goodness knows that I am perfectly willing to
deal with long-term mechanics and planning. *looks at 蘭亭社*
天火狐
On 5 September 2017 at 10:11, Nic Evans wrote:
> Right now, under my reading, Monsters don't do anything when created? In
> my
I support this movement.
天火狐
On 7 September 2017 at 11:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > It doesn't take 30 days due to a bug.
> [...]
> > I'd think about doing so as a protest; the difficulty towards casual
> > player economic
I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if
deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I
intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for articles if
they wish to submit them and I choose to include them.
Please find a
ts
> contradict that and if they don’t they will in the future.
> > >
> > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sep 10, 2017, at 8:13 PM, VJ Rada &
Yeah, that's the one. CB: you get yourself a freebie since someone else dug
it up for you.
天火狐
On 10 September 2017 at 20:12, VJ Rada wrote:
> I cause 天火狐 using eir latest agency which I believe is 狐票店 but I make
> no promises, to vote in the ADoP and PM elections in this
wrote:
>> > Thanks! I was remembering that you'd given a favored transliteration
>> back
>> > then, but couldn't find it.
>> >
>> > I think I'll add this as gratuitous arguments to that case log, so I'll
>> > know where to find it :).
>> >
>> >
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo